Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology最新文献

Background: There is a paucity of data comparing conduction system pacing (CSP) to biventricular pacing (BiVP) in patients with heart failure (HF) with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Objective: Compare the clinical outcomes of patients with mid-range LVEF undergoing CSP versus BiVP.

Methods: Patients with mid-range LVEF (> 35 to 50%) undergoing CSP or BiVP were retrospectively identified. Lead performance, LVEF, HF hospitalization, and clinical composite outcome including upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy and mortality were compared.

Results: A total of 36 patients (20 BiVP, 16 CSP--14 His bundle pacing, 4 left bundle branch area pacing) were analyzed. The mean age was 73 ± 15, 44% were female, and the mean LVEF was 42 ± 5%. Procedural and fluoroscopy time was comparable between the two groups. QRS duration was significantly shorter for the CSP group compared to the BiVP group (P < 0.001). During a mean follow-up of 47 ± 36 months, no significant differences were found in thresholds or need for generator change due to early battery depletion. LVEF improved in both groups (41.5 ± 4.5% to 53.9 ± 10.9% BiVP, P < 0.001; 41.6 ± 5.3% to 52.5 ± 8.3% CSP, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in HF hospitalizations (P = 0.71) or clinical composite outcomes (P = 0.07).

Conclusion: Among patients with HF with moderately reduced ejection fraction, CSP appears associated with similar improvements in LVEF and had similar clinical outcomes as BiVP in mid-term follow-up.

Background: The prognostic value of (non)-invasive programmed ventricular stimulation (NIPS) to predict recurrences of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is under discussion. Optimal endpoints of VT ablation are not well defined, and optimal timepoint of NIPS is unknown. The goal of this study was to evaluate the ability of programmed ventricular stimulation at the end of the VT ablation procedure (PVS) and NIPS after VT ablation to identify patients at high risk for VT recurrence.

Methods: Between January 2016 and February 2022, consecutive patients with VT and structural heart disease undergoing first VT ablation and consecutive NIPS were included. In total, 138 patients were included. All patients underwent NIPS through their implanted ICDs after a median of 3 (1-5) days after ablation (at least 2 drive cycle lengths (500 and 400 ms) and up to four right ventricular extrastimuli until refractoriness). Clinical VT was defined by comparison with 12-lead electrocardiograms and stored ICD electrograms from spontaneous VT episodes. Patients were followed for a median of 37 (13-61) months.

Results: Of the 138 patients, 104 were non-inducible (75%), 27 were inducible for non-clinical VTs (20%), and 7 for clinical VT (5%). In 107 patients (78%), concordant results of PVS and NIPS were observed. After 37 ± 20 months, the recurrence rate for any ventricular arrhythmia was 40% (normal NIPS 29% vs. inducible VT during NIPS 66%; log-rank p = 0.001) and for clinical VT was 3% (normal NIPS 1% vs. inducible VT during NIPS 9%; log-rank p = 0.045). Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of NIPS were higher compared to PVS (PPV: 65% vs. 46% and NPV: 68% vs. 61%). NIPS revealed the highest NPV among patients with ICM and LVEF > 35%. Patients with inducible VT during NIPS had the highest VT recurrences and overall mortality. Patients with both negative PVS and NIPS had the lowest any VT recurrence rates with 32%. Early re-ablation of patients with recurrent VTs during index hospitalization was feasible but did not reveal better long-term VT-free survival.

Conclusions: In patients after VT ablation and structural heart disease, NIPS is superior to post-ablation PVS to stratify the risk of VT recurrences. The PPV and NPV of NIPS at day 3 were superior compared to PVS at the end of the procedure to predict recurrent VT, especially in patients with ICM.

Background: We sought to evaluate the anatomic and functional lesion development over time at different atrial sites immediately following delivery of pulsed field ablation (PFA).

Methods: Using a porcine model, PFA ablations were performed in the superior vena cava (SVC), right atrial lateral wall (RA), left atrial appendage (LAA), and right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) using four different PFA profiles. Mapping was done sequentially in 5-20-min increments up to 280-min post lesion delivery for low voltage area (LVA) assessment and conduction velocity. Lesion characteristics were noted with voltage mapping immediately post ablation and at the serial time points.

Results: In 9 animals, 33 sites were ablated. None of the four different profiles across all sites showed any statistical difference on acute lesion formation or persistence. Higher tissue contact was observed in the SVC and RSPV and lower tissue contact was observed in the LAA and RA locations. Higher contact areas were noted to have higher density electroanatomic low voltage area (LVA) (12/14 vs 5/18, p = 0.01) and larger lesions on gross pathology (2 /14 vs 6/16, p = 0.01) compared to lower contact areas. Lesion regression occurred in 16/33 sites. Sustained lesions were significantly more prevalent in higher versus lower contact sites (65% vs 38%, p = 0.037).

Conclusion: The development of significant and durable lesions for PFA in a porcine model appears to be dependent on tissue proximity and contact.

Background: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a feasible and effective physiological pacing technique. The QRS morphology of left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) is similar to that of LBBP. The ventricular activation pattern of LBBP is well-known, whereas the pattern of LVSP still needs further investigation. The present study aimed to determine ventricular activation pattern difference between LVSP and LBBP in a canine model.

Method: All six canines underwent successful LBBP and LVSP through trans-ventricular septum using intracardiac echocardiography and intracardiac electrogram. Their hearts were isolated and stained with Lugol's iodine to determine the position of the pacing lead. The activation sequences of the left ventricular myocardium and His-Purkinje system were recorded by placing multiple electrode catheters.

Results: First, the left His-Purkinje system in LVSP was activated simultaneously from apical and basal regions to the left ventricular middle septal region, whereas the left ventricular septal myocardium was activated from the apical to basal region. The left His-Purkinje system activation in LBBP occurred in the direction of the apex from the pacing lead, but the left ventricular septal myocardium was activated in the apical to basal direction. Furthermore, the left intraventricular electrical synchrony was similar between LVSP and LBBP as determined by mapping the left ventricular septal to free wall activation time (46.7 ± 1.8 ms vs. 45.0 ± 1.4 ms, p = 0.11).

Conclusion: The ventricular activation sequence of LVSP was similar to LBBP. LVSP can capture LBB due to the wide distribution of LBB. These findings suggest a rationale for clinical application of LVSP.

Background and aims: Catheter ablation is superior to pharmacological therapy in controlling atrial fibrillation (AF). There are few data on the long-term outcome of AF ablation in octogenarian patients. This analysis aims to evaluate the outcome of AF ablation in octogenarians vs. younger patients.

Methods: In this retrospective study in 13 centres in the UK, France, and Switzerland, the long-term outcomes of 473 consecutive octogenarian patients undergoing ablation for AF were compared to 473 matched younger controls (median age 81.3 [80.0, 83.0] vs. 64.4 [56.5, 70.7] years, 54.3% vs. 35.1% females; p-value for both < 0.001). The primary endpoint was the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia after a blanking period of 90 days within 365 days of follow-up.

Results: Acute ablation success as defined as isolation of all pulmonary veins was achieved in 97% of octogenarians. Octogenarians experienced more procedural complications (11.4% vs 7.0%, p = 0.018). The median follow-up time was 281 [106, 365] days vs. 354 [220, 365] days for octogenarians vs. non-octogenarians (p < 0.001). Among octogenarians, 27.7% (131 patients) experienced a recurrence of atrial arrhythmia, in contrast to 23.5% (111 patients) in the younger group (odds ratio 1.49; 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.92; p = 0.002). In a multivariable regression model including gender, previous AF ablation, vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, CHA2DS2-VASc score, left atrial dilatation, and indwelling cardiac implantable electronic device, age above 80 remained an independent predictor of recurrence of arrhythmia.

Conclusion: Ablation for AF is effective in octogenarians, but is associated with slightly higher procedural complication rate and recurrence of atrial arrhythmia than in younger patients.

Background: The long-term success rate of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is suboptimal due to the presence of non-pulmonary vein (PV) foci that can trigger atrial fibrillation (AF) in up to 11%. Among non-PV triggers, the superior vena cava (SVC) is a major site of origin of ectopic beats initiating AF.

Objective: To compare data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing PVI + empiric SVC isolation (SVCI) versus PVI alone in terms of AF recurrence, procedure-related complications, and fluoroscopic and procedural times.

Methods: A search of online scientific libraries (from inception to April 1, 2024) was performed. Four RCTs were considered eligible for the meta-analysis totaling 600 patients of whom 287 receiving PVI + SVCI and 313 receiving PVI alone.

Results: In the overall population, SVCI + PVI was associated with a non-significant reduction of AF recurrence at follow-up (0.66 [0.43;1.00], p = 0.05, I² 0%). In patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF), a significant reduction of AF recurrence was related to SVCI + PVI (11.7%) as compared to PVI alone (19.9%) (0.54 [0.32;0.92], p = 0.02, I² 0%). No statistical differences were found among the groups in terms of fluoroscopic (3.31 [- 0.8;7.41], p = 0.11, I² = 91%), procedural times (5.69 [- 9.78;21.16], p = 0.47, I² = 81%), and complications (1.06 [0.33;3.44], p = 0.92, I² = 0%).

Conclusion: The addition of SVCI to PVI in patients in PAF is associated with a significant lower rate of AF recurrence at follow-up, without increasing complication rates and procedural and fluoroscopy times.