Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology最新文献

Background: A novel irrigated radiofrequency balloon (RFB) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) integrated into a 3D mapping platform was recently launched.

Methods: Patients undergoing a first atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation at two German high-volume EP centers were included into the prospective AURORA registry. All patients underwent clinical follow-up (FU) at 90, 180, and 360 days following ablation including 48-h Holter ECGs.

Results: A total of 99 patients were enrolled (43/99 (43.4%) women, median age 67 years (interquartile range [IQR] 59-74), 43/99 (43.4%) persistent AF (Pers-AF), median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 60% (IQR 62-55)). Eighty-eight patients completed the follow-up. Acute PVI was achieved in 383/383 (100%) PV. Single-shot PVI was achieved in 211/383 (55.1%) PVs. Primary adverse events occurred in 3% of patients (1 postprocedural pharyngeal bleeding, 1 myocardial infarction, 1 non-cardiovascular death); no pericardial effusion, stroke, or phrenic nerve paralysis was observed. Median ablation and procedure times were 23 (IQR 18-32) and 67 (IQR 57-85) min, respectively. Median dose area product was 761 (IQR 509-1534) mGycm². AF-free survival after a median FU of 361 (IQR 261-375) days was 78.4% for paroxysmal AF (PAF) and 75.4% for Pers-AF (p value = 0.828). Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia at the 90-day visit was the only independent predictor for AF recurrence at 1 year upon multiple regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.198; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.036-10.32, p value = 0.0433).

Conclusion: RFB-based PVI is acutely successful, appears safe, and has comparable rhythm outcomes to other single-shot AF ablation tools. A recurrence of AF at 90 days predicts later AF recurrence.

Background: Data about necessity of performing transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) prior to every catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the safety of an individualized risk-based approach to TOE with respect to thromboembolic cerebrovascular events (CVE) in patients undergoing CA for AF or left atrial tachycardia (AT).

Methods: We performed a retrospective clinical study based on our institutional registry database. Patients undergoing CA for AF or left-sided AT following initial AF ablation at two participating centers were enrolled. Prior to the procedure, patients were scheduled for TOE only if they had a history of thromboembolic stroke, left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus, or inappropriate anticoagulation regimen in the previous 3 to 4 weeks. The incidence of periprocedural cerebrovascular thromboembolic events was assessed.

Results: We analyzed 1155 patients (median age 70 years, 54.8% male, 48.1% had persistent AF/AT). In 261 patients, a TOE was performed; in 2 patients (0.7%), an LAA thrombus was detected, which led to cancellation of the catheter ablation; in 894 patients, the TOE was omitted. Of the 1153 (0.35%) patients who underwent ablation, 4 (0.35%) experienced a CVE (one TIA and three strokes). The rate of CVE in our study does not exceed that reported in most multicenter trials. The low event rates limited statistical analysis of possible risk factors for CVE. In all 4 patients with CVE, post-CVE imaging showed the absence of LAA thrombus.

Conclusions: An individualized selective approach to TOE before catheter ablation of AF or left AT showed a very low risk of overt intraprocedural thromboembolic events for the population in our study. A further randomized controlled study is needed to determine whether TOE prior to catheter ablation without ICE could be omitted in patients with uninterrupted OAC without previous thromboembolic events or a history of left atrial thrombus.

Background and aims: Wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) can protect patients from sudden cardiac death due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias and serve as a bridge to decision of definite defibrillator implantation. The aim of this analysis from an international, multicenter WCD registry was to identify predictors of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in this population.

Methods: One thousand six hundred seventy-five patients with WCD were included in a multicenter registry from 9 European centers, with a median follow-up of 440 days (IQR 120-893). The primary study end point was the occurrence of sustained VT/VF.

Results: Sustained VT was detected by WCD in 5.4% and VF in 0.9% of all patients. Of the 30.3% of patients receiving ICD implantation during follow-up, sustained VT was recorded in 9.3% and VF in 2.6%. Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (HR 0.5, p < 0.001), and medication with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (HR 0.7, p = 0.027) and aldosterone antagonists (HR 0.7, p = 0.005) were associated with a significantly lower risk of VT/VF.

Conclusions: Patients who received WCD due to a transient increased risk of sudden cardiac death have a comparatively lower risk of VT/VF in the presence of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Of note, optimal medical treatment for heart failure not only results in an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction but also in a reduction in the risk for VT/VF.

Background: Atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) with permanent pacing is an effective treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) prevents cardiac dyssynchrony associated with right ventricular pacing and could prevent worsening of heart failure (HF).

Methods: In this retrospective monocentric study, all patients who received AVNA procedure with LBBAP were consecutively included. AVNA procedure data, electrical and echocardiographic parameters at 6 months, and clinical outcomes at 1 year were studied and compared to a matched cohort of patients who received AVNA procedure with conventional pacing between 2010 and 2023.

Results: Seventy-five AVNA procedures associated with LBBAP were studied. AVNA in this context was feasible, with a success rate of 98.7% at first ablation, and safe without any complications. There was no threshold rise at follow-up. At 1 year, 6 (8%) patients were hospitalized for HF and 2 (2.7%) were deceased. Patients had a significant improvement in NYHA class and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (P ≤ 0.0001). When compared to a matched cohort of patients with AVNA and conventional pacing, AVNA data and pacing complications rates were similar. Patients with LBBAP had a better improvement of LVEF (+5.27 ± 9.62% vs. -0.48 ± 14%, P = 0.01), and a lower 1-year rate of composite outcome of hospitalization for HF or death (HR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.16-0.95, P = 0.037), significant on survival analysis (log-rank P-value = 0.03).

Conclusion: AVNA with LBBAP in patients with symptomatic AF is feasible, safe, and efficient. Hospitalization for HF or death rate was significantly lower and LVEF improvement was greater.

Background: There is a lack of data on the impact of sex on the outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. We aimed to analyze the association of sex with outcomes of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure.

Methods: The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was analyzed from 2016 to 2019 to identify patients ≥ 18 years old with heart failure (HF) undergoing AF ablation. The outcomes of interest included peri-procedural complications, in-hospital mortality, resource utilization, and unplanned 1-year readmissions. The final cohort was divided into patients with HFrEF and HFpEF and outcomes were compared between males and females in both cohorts.

Results: A total of 23,277 patients with HF underwent AF ablation between 2016 and 2019, of which 14,480 had HFrEF and 8,797 had HFpEF. Among patients with HFrEF, 61.6% were males and 38.4% were females whereas, among patients with HFpEF, 35.4% were males and 64.6% were females. On a multivariable-adjusted analysis, in patients with HFrEF, there was no difference in the odds of in-hospital mortality, peri-procedural complications, or 1-year HF-related/AF-related/all-cause readmissions between males and females. In patients with HFpEF, females had a higher risk 1-year HF-related readmissions (adjusted hazards ratio: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.13-1.87; p = 0.01), without any difference in the 1-year AF-related/all-cause readmissions, in-hospital mortality, or peri-procedural complications.

Conclusion: Our results show that females with HFrEF undergoing AF ablation have similar outcomes whereas females with HFpEF have higher 1-year HF readmissions with no difference in the other outcomes, compared to males.

Background: Catheter ablation has become a widely accepted treatment for atrial fibrillation, but early recurrences remain a challenge, often attributed to inflammatory responses triggered during the procedure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of colchicine in preventing short-term AF recurrence post-ablation.

Method: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing use of colchicine and placebo in patients after AF ablation. Outcomes included AF recurrence, GI side effects, and hospitalization. R program (version 4.3.2) was used for statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed with I² statistics.

Results: Five studies, including 1592 patients, were analyzed. Pooled results revealed no statistically significant decrease in AF recurrence (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.48-1.12; p = 0.153) and pericarditis rates (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.26-1.72; p = 0.403) with colchicine use. No significant difference in hospitalization rates was observed between colchicine and placebo groups (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.63-1.59; p = 0.996). In addition, gastrointestinal side effects were notably higher in the colchicine group (OR 4.84; 95% CI 2.58-9.05; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Prophylactic use of colchicine after atrial ablation was not associated with a reduction in AF recurrence and pericarditis rates. In addition, there was no difference in the rate of all-cause hospitalization between the groups, and colchicine use was associated with gastrointestinal adverse events.

Background: While studies comparing the effectiveness of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine are prevalent in other nations, using remifentanil alone is uncommon in Malaysia. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of sedation with remifentanil or dexmedetomidine infusion in monitored anesthesia care for electrophysiology procedures.

Methods: This study is a single-center, single-blinded, prospective randomized clinical study. One hundred twenty patients were randomized into two groups (remifentanil vs dexmedetomidine). Demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes, including level of sedation, vital signs, and patient satisfaction were monitored and recorded.

Results: Group R showed a higher mean observer's assessment of alertness/sedation score (3.9 ± 0.7 vs 3.6 ± 0.8; p = 0.008), mean arterial pressure (92.0 ± 12.0 vs 83.0 ± 13.0 mmHg; p < 0.001), heart rate (82.0 ± 20.0 vs 73.0 ± 18.0 beats/min; p = 0.006), systolic blood pressure (139.0 ± 16.0 vs 123.0 ± 17.0 mmHg; p < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (75.0 ± 13.0 vs 69.0 ± 14.0 mmHg; p = 0.009) than Group D. Oxygen saturation (99.0 ± 1.0%; p = 0.220) and respiration rate (16.0 ± 3.0 breaths/min; p = 0.361) for both groups were the same. Adverse events, including hypotension, bradycardia, and respiratory depression were observed in both groups. Both groups gave positive responses ranging from fair to good for patient satisfaction.

Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is a better choice of anesthesia as it was associated with a higher level of sedation, more stable hemodynamics, lower incidence of adverse events, and better patient satisfaction.