首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management最新文献

英文 中文
Assessing the impact of big data analytics capability on radical innovation: is business intelligence always a path? 评估大数据分析能力对激进创新的影响:商业智能总是一条路吗?
IF 7.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI: 10.1108/jmtm-12-2023-0532
Weiwei Wu, Yang Gao, Yexin Liu

Purpose

This study examines the mediating roles of the three dimensions of business intelligence (sensing capability, transforming capability and driving capability) in the relationship between the three dimensions of big data analytics capability (big data analytics management, technology and talent capabilities), and radical innovation among Chinese manufacturing enterprises.

Design/methodology/approach

A theoretical framework was developed using the resource-based view. The hypothesis was tested using empirical survey data from 326 Chinese manufacturing enterprises.

Findings

Empirical results show that, in the Chinese manufacturing context, business intelligence sensing capability, business intelligence transforming capability and business intelligence driving capability positively mediate the impact of big data analytics capability on radical innovation.

Practical implications

The results offer managerial guidance for leaders to properly use big data analytics capability, business intelligence and radical innovation as well as offering theoretical insight for future research in the manufacturing industry’s radical innovation.

Originality/value

This is among the first studies to examine three dimensions of big data analytics capability on the manufacturing industry’s radical innovation by considering the mediating role of three dimensions of business intelligence.

目的 本研究探讨了商业智能的三个维度(感知能力、转化能力和驱动能力)在大数据分析能力的三个维度(大数据分析管理能力、技术能力和人才能力)与中国制造企业激进创新之间关系中的中介作用。结果实证结果表明,在中国制造业背景下,商业智能感知能力、商业智能转化能力和商业智能驱动能力对大数据分析能力对激进式创新的影响具有正向中介作用。研究结果为领导者正确使用大数据分析能力、商业智能和激进创新提供了管理指导,也为制造业激进创新的未来研究提供了理论启示。
{"title":"Assessing the impact of big data analytics capability on radical innovation: is business intelligence always a path?","authors":"Weiwei Wu, Yang Gao, Yexin Liu","doi":"10.1108/jmtm-12-2023-0532","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-12-2023-0532","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>This study examines the mediating roles of the three dimensions of business intelligence (sensing capability, transforming capability and driving capability) in the relationship between the three dimensions of big data analytics capability (big data analytics management, technology and talent capabilities), and radical innovation among Chinese manufacturing enterprises.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>A theoretical framework was developed using the resource-based view. The hypothesis was tested using empirical survey data from 326 Chinese manufacturing enterprises.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>Empirical results show that, in the Chinese manufacturing context, business intelligence sensing capability, business intelligence transforming capability and business intelligence driving capability positively mediate the impact of big data analytics capability on radical innovation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Practical implications</h3>\u0000<p>The results offer managerial guidance for leaders to properly use big data analytics capability, business intelligence and radical innovation as well as offering theoretical insight for future research in the manufacturing industry’s radical innovation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>This is among the first studies to examine three dimensions of big data analytics capability on the manufacturing industry’s radical innovation by considering the mediating role of three dimensions of business intelligence.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":16301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140615586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating the impact of smart manufacturing and interconnected emerging technologies in building smarter supply chains 研究智能制造和互联新兴技术对打造更智能供应链的影响
IF 7.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI: 10.1108/jmtm-11-2023-0498
Prajakta Chandrakant Kandarkar, V. Ravi

Purpose

Industry 4.0 has put forward a smart perspective on managing supply chain networks and their operations. The current manufacturing system is primarily data-driven. Industries are deploying new emerging technologies in their operations to build a competitive edge in the business environment; however, the true potential of smart manufacturing has not yet been fully unveiled. This research aims to extensively analyse emerging technologies and their interconnection with smart manufacturing in developing smarter supply chains.

Design/methodology/approach

This research endeavours to establish a conceptual framework for a smart supply chain. A real case study on a smart factory is conducted to demonstrate the validity of this framework for building smarter supply chains. A comparative analysis is carried out between conventional and smart supply chains to ascertain the advantages of smart supply chains. In addition, a thorough investigation of the several factors needed to transition from smart to smarter supply chains is undertaken.

Findings

The integration of smart technology exemplifies the ability to improve the efficiency of supply chain operations. Research findings indicate that transitioning to a smart factory radically enhances productivity, quality assurance, data privacy and labour efficiency. The outcomes of this research will help academic and industrial sectors critically comprehend technological breakthroughs and their applications in smart supply chains.

Originality/value

This study highlights the implications of incorporating smart technologies into supply chain operations, specifically in smart purchasing, smart factory operations, smart warehousing and smart customer performance. A paradigm transition from conventional, smart to smarter supply chains offers a comprehensive perspective on the evolving dynamics in automation, optimisation and manufacturing technology domains, ultimately leading to the emergence of Industry 5.0.

目的工业 4.0 提出了管理供应链网络及其运营的智能视角。当前的制造系统主要由数据驱动。各行各业都在其运营中部署新兴技术,以建立在商业环境中的竞争优势;然而,智能制造的真正潜力尚未完全显现。本研究旨在广泛分析新兴技术及其与智能制造的相互联系,以开发更智能的供应链。对一家智能工厂进行了实际案例研究,以证明该框架在构建智能供应链方面的有效性。对传统供应链和智能供应链进行比较分析,以确定智能供应链的优势。此外,还对从智能供应链过渡到更智能供应链所需的若干因素进行了深入调查。研究结果表明,向智能工厂过渡可从根本上提高生产率、质量保证、数据隐私和劳动效率。本研究的成果将有助于学术界和工业部门批判性地理解技术突破及其在智能供应链中的应用。原创性/价值本研究强调了将智能技术融入供应链运营的意义,特别是在智能采购、智能工厂运营、智能仓储和智能客户绩效方面。从传统供应链、智能供应链到更智能供应链的范式转变,为自动化、优化和制造技术领域不断发展的动态提供了一个全面的视角,最终导致工业 5.0 的出现。
{"title":"Investigating the impact of smart manufacturing and interconnected emerging technologies in building smarter supply chains","authors":"Prajakta Chandrakant Kandarkar, V. Ravi","doi":"10.1108/jmtm-11-2023-0498","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-11-2023-0498","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>Industry 4.0 has put forward a smart perspective on managing supply chain networks and their operations. The current manufacturing system is primarily data-driven. Industries are deploying new emerging technologies in their operations to build a competitive edge in the business environment; however, the true potential of smart manufacturing has not yet been fully unveiled. This research aims to extensively analyse emerging technologies and their interconnection with smart manufacturing in developing smarter supply chains.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>This research endeavours to establish a conceptual framework for a smart supply chain. A real case study on a smart factory is conducted to demonstrate the validity of this framework for building smarter supply chains. A comparative analysis is carried out between conventional and smart supply chains to ascertain the advantages of smart supply chains. In addition, a thorough investigation of the several factors needed to transition from smart to smarter supply chains is undertaken.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>The integration of smart technology exemplifies the ability to improve the efficiency of supply chain operations. Research findings indicate that transitioning to a smart factory radically enhances productivity, quality assurance, data privacy and labour efficiency. The outcomes of this research will help academic and industrial sectors critically comprehend technological breakthroughs and their applications in smart supply chains.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>This study highlights the implications of incorporating smart technologies into supply chain operations, specifically in smart purchasing, smart factory operations, smart warehousing and smart customer performance. A paradigm transition from conventional, smart to smarter supply chains offers a comprehensive perspective on the evolving dynamics in automation, optimisation and manufacturing technology domains, ultimately leading to the emergence of Industry 5.0.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":16301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140615590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating a manufacturing ecosystem in transition toward electric vehicles – a business model perspective 调查向电动汽车转型的制造生态系统--商业模式视角
IF 7.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI: 10.1108/jmtm-07-2023-0279
Michael Rachinger, Julian M. Müller

Purpose

Business Model Innovation is increasingly created by an ecosystem of related companies. This paper aims to investigate the transition of a manufacturing ecosystem toward electric vehicles from a business model perspective.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors investigate an automotive manufacturing ecosystem that is in transition toward electric and electrified vehicles, conducting semi-structured interviews with 46 informants from 27 ecosystem members.

Findings

The results reveal that the actions of several ecosystem members are driven by regulations relating to emissions. Novel requirements regarding components and complementary offers necessitate the entry of actors from other industries and the formation of new ecosystem members. While the newly emerged ecosystem has roots in an established ecosystem, it relies on new value offers. Further, the findings highlight the importance of ecosystem governance, while the necessary degree of change in the members' business models depends on their roles and positions in the ecosystem. Therefore, upstream suppliers of components must perform business model adaptation, whereas downstream providers must perform more complex business model innovation.

Originality/value

The paper is among the first to investigate an entire manufacturing ecosystem and analyze its transition toward electric vehicles and the implications for business model innovation.

目的 商业模式创新越来越多地由相关公司的生态系统创造。本文旨在从商业模式的角度研究一个制造生态系统向电动汽车的转型。作者调查了一个正在向电动汽车和电气化汽车转型的汽车制造生态系统,对来自 27 个生态系统成员的 46 名信息提供者进行了半结构化访谈。对零部件和互补产品的新要求促使其他行业的参与者加入,并形成了新的生态系统成员。虽然新出现的生态系统植根于已有的生态系统,但它依赖于新的价值提供。此外,研究结果还强调了生态系统治理的重要性,而成员业务模式的必要改变程度取决于其在生态系统中的角色和地位。因此,上游零部件供应商必须进行商业模式调整,而下游供应商则必须进行更复杂的商业模式创新。
{"title":"Investigating a manufacturing ecosystem in transition toward electric vehicles – a business model perspective","authors":"Michael Rachinger, Julian M. Müller","doi":"10.1108/jmtm-07-2023-0279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-07-2023-0279","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>Business Model Innovation is increasingly created by an ecosystem of related companies. This paper aims to investigate the transition of a manufacturing ecosystem toward electric vehicles from a business model perspective.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>The authors investigate an automotive manufacturing ecosystem that is in transition toward electric and electrified vehicles, conducting semi-structured interviews with 46 informants from 27 ecosystem members.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>The results reveal that the actions of several ecosystem members are driven by regulations relating to emissions. Novel requirements regarding components and complementary offers necessitate the entry of actors from other industries and the formation of new ecosystem members. While the newly emerged ecosystem has roots in an established ecosystem, it relies on new value offers. Further, the findings highlight the importance of ecosystem governance, while the necessary degree of change in the members' business models depends on their roles and positions in the ecosystem. Therefore, upstream suppliers of components must perform business model adaptation, whereas downstream providers must perform more complex business model innovation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>The paper is among the first to investigate an entire manufacturing ecosystem and analyze its transition toward electric vehicles and the implications for business model innovation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":16301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140580432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Technological capability and firm performance: a literature review with meta-analysis of studies into manufacturing firms 技术能力与企业绩效:对制造业企业研究的文献综述与元分析
IF 7.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI: 10.1108/jmtm-02-2022-0089
Mônica Fitz-Oliveira, Jorge Tello-Gamarra

Purpose

Different studies have been conducted on the relationship between technological capability and firm performance. These studies obtain different values for the relationship, known as heterogeneous results. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationship between technological capability and firm performance and its statistical between-study heterogeneity.

Design/methodology/approach

In order to analyze all the results from this relationship that were found in the literature, we adopted the literature review with a meta-analytic method. We consulted the Scopus and Web of Science databases, which returned, after the application of inclusion criteria, 23 primary studies with data from 5,882 manufacturing firms.

Findings

We observed that technological capability and performance are positively related; however, the results regarding this relationship are heterogeneous. We discovered four possible sources of statistical between-study heterogeneity: (i) the statistical between-study heterogeneity of the variables to measure technological capability and performance; (ii) orientation of the thematic approach – some illustrate the relationship between technological capability and performance using mathematical and theoretical models, while others examine the relationship between technological capability and performance and propose implications pertaining to that relationship; (iii) the source of data for primary studies and (iv) the context in which this relationship is observed.

Research limitations/implications

It is necessary to standardize a set of variables through which technological capability and performance are evaluated so that results and implications can be usefully compared between countries and industrial sectors.

Originality/value

The contribution to knowledge is identifying the statistical between-study heterogeneity on the relationship between technological capabilities and firm performance, as well as its potential sources.

目的对技术能力与公司业绩之间的关系进行了不同的研究。这些研究得出了不同的关系值,即所谓的异质性结果。本文旨在分析技术能力与企业绩效之间的关系及其研究间的统计异质性。设计/方法/途径为了分析文献中关于这一关系的所有结果,我们采用了文献综述与元分析方法。我们查阅了 Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库,在应用纳入标准后,共检索到 23 项主要研究,数据来自 5882 家制造企业。我们发现了研究间统计异质性的四个可能来源:(i) 衡量技术能力和绩效的变量在研究间的统计异质性;(ii) 主题方法的取向--有些研究利用数学和理论模型说明了技术能力和绩效之间的关系,而另一些研究则考察了技术能力和绩效之间的关系,并提出了与这种关系相关的启示;(iii) 原始研究的数据来源;(iv) 观察这种关系的背景。研究局限性/意义有必要对评估技术能力和绩效的一系列变量进行标准化,以便在不同国家和工业部门之间对结果和影响进行有益的比较。
{"title":"Technological capability and firm performance: a literature review with meta-analysis of studies into manufacturing firms","authors":"Mônica Fitz-Oliveira, Jorge Tello-Gamarra","doi":"10.1108/jmtm-02-2022-0089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-02-2022-0089","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>Different studies have been conducted on the relationship between technological capability and firm performance. These studies obtain different values for the relationship, known as heterogeneous results. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationship between technological capability and firm performance and its statistical between-study heterogeneity.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>In order to analyze all the results from this relationship that were found in the literature, we adopted the literature review with a meta-analytic method. We consulted the Scopus and Web of Science databases, which returned, after the application of inclusion criteria, 23 primary studies with data from 5,882 manufacturing firms.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>We observed that technological capability and performance are positively related; however, the results regarding this relationship are heterogeneous. We discovered four possible sources of statistical between-study heterogeneity: (i) the statistical between-study heterogeneity of the variables to measure technological capability and performance; (ii) orientation of the thematic approach – some illustrate the relationship between technological capability and performance using mathematical and theoretical models, while others examine the relationship between technological capability and performance and propose implications pertaining to that relationship; (iii) the source of data for primary studies and (iv) the context in which this relationship is observed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\u0000<p>It is necessary to standardize a set of variables through which technological capability and performance are evaluated so that results and implications can be usefully compared between countries and industrial sectors.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>The contribution to knowledge is identifying the statistical between-study heterogeneity on the relationship between technological capabilities and firm performance, as well as its potential sources.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":16301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140580320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The contradictory effect of lean and industry 4.0 synergy on firm performance: a meta-analysis 精益与工业 4.0 协同作用对企业绩效的矛盾影响:一项元分析
IF 7.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI: 10.1108/jmtm-10-2023-0447
Diego Biondo, Dalton Alexandre Kai, Edson Pinheiro de Lima, Guilherme Brittes Benitez

Purpose

While previous operations management literature acknowledges the positive influence of Lean and Industry (I4.0) on performance, recent studies examining the synergy between these two factors have produced inconsistent and contradictory results. Therefore, this study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the effect of Lean and I4.0 synergy on firm performance.

Design/methodology/approach

This study utilised a meta-analysis approach, examining 23 empirical studies exploring multiple effects of the Lean and I4.0 synergy on firm performance. Multiple subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the contradictory outcomes and identify in what conditions such synergy may achieve performance.

Findings

The results affirm the prevailing positivist perspective among most scholars regarding the positive influence of the Lean and I4.0 synergy on firm performance. However, the overall effect size derived from the studies indicates a weak relationship, suggesting that this synergy alone is not the sole determinant factor of firm performance. In addition, the subgroup analyses reveal the presence of contingent conditions that may affect the performance outcomes when integrating Lean and I4.0, as most effects exhibit a weak relationship.

Originality/value

This study represents the first meta-analysis investigating the relationship between the Lean and I4.0 synergy on firm performance. By shedding light on the contradictory effects often depicted in the operations management literature, this study provides a critical reflection for researchers who tend to adopt an overly optimistic view of such synergy.

目的虽然以往的运营管理文献承认精益和工业(I4.0)对绩效的积极影响,但最近对这两个因素之间协同作用的研究却产生了不一致和相互矛盾的结果。因此,本研究旨在全面了解精益与工业 4.0 协同作用对企业绩效的影响。本研究采用了元分析方法,考察了 23 项实证研究,探讨了精益与工业 4.0 协同作用对企业绩效的多重影响。研究结果肯定了大多数学者关于精益和 I4.0 协同作用对企业绩效的积极影响的普遍实证主义观点。然而,从研究得出的总体效应大小来看,两者之间的关系并不紧密,这表明这种协同作用本身并不是企业绩效的唯一决定因素。此外,分组分析表明,在整合精益和 I4.0 时,存在可能影响绩效结果的偶然条件,因为大多数效应都表现出微弱的关系。通过揭示运营管理文献中经常描述的矛盾效应,本研究为那些倾向于对这种协同作用采取过于乐观观点的研究人员提供了批判性的反思。
{"title":"The contradictory effect of lean and industry 4.0 synergy on firm performance: a meta-analysis","authors":"Diego Biondo, Dalton Alexandre Kai, Edson Pinheiro de Lima, Guilherme Brittes Benitez","doi":"10.1108/jmtm-10-2023-0447","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-10-2023-0447","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>While previous operations management literature acknowledges the positive influence of Lean and Industry (I4.0) on performance, recent studies examining the synergy between these two factors have produced inconsistent and contradictory results. Therefore, this study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the effect of Lean and I4.0 synergy on firm performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>This study utilised a meta-analysis approach, examining 23 empirical studies exploring multiple effects of the Lean and I4.0 synergy on firm performance. Multiple subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the contradictory outcomes and identify in what conditions such synergy may achieve performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>The results affirm the prevailing positivist perspective among most scholars regarding the positive influence of the Lean and I4.0 synergy on firm performance. However, the overall effect size derived from the studies indicates a weak relationship, suggesting that this synergy alone is not the sole determinant factor of firm performance. In addition, the subgroup analyses reveal the presence of contingent conditions that may affect the performance outcomes when integrating Lean and I4.0, as most effects exhibit a weak relationship.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>This study represents the first meta-analysis investigating the relationship between the Lean and I4.0 synergy on firm performance. By shedding light on the contradictory effects often depicted in the operations management literature, this study provides a critical reflection for researchers who tend to adopt an overly optimistic view of such synergy.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":16301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140580325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An implementation model for socio-technical digital tools 社会技术数字工具的实施模式
IF 7.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI: 10.1108/jmtm-06-2023-0230
Bassel Kassem, Matteo Rossini, Stefano Frecassetti, Federica Costa, Alberto Portioli Staudacher

Purpose

While Digitalisation is gaining momentum among practitioners and the scientific world, there is still a struggle to embark on the digitalisation journey successfully. The struggles are more significant for SMEs compared to large companies. Such transformation could face internal resistance, which evokes the need to put it into a socio-technical perspective such as lean. This paper investigates how SMEs could implement digital tools and technologies in their operations.

Design/methodology/approach

We relied on a multiple case study design in three SME manufacturing companies in Italy. Based on the experience of those companies, the struggles in the implementation and the lessons learned, we formulate an implementation model of digital tools driven by lean thinking.

Findings

Companies tend to implement first digital tools that help with real-time data collection and stress that introducing digital tools becomes challenging without reducing waste in production. The model stresses top management commitment, middle-line involvement and operator training to resist change. All these factors coincide with socio-technical lean bundles developed by seminal works. In addition, the study highlights that financial incentives are not necessarily the common barrier to digital tools implementation in SMEs but rather the cultural aspect.

Originality/value

Our paper enriches the extant body of knowledge by deriving knowledge around digitalisation implementation through lessons learned and corrective actions. It allows managers to benchmark and compare the current state of the implementation process with that of other companies and the one proposed to make corrective actions when necessary.

目的虽然数字化在从业人员和科学界的发展势头日益强劲,但要成功踏上数字化征程仍有许多困难。与大公司相比,中小企业面临的困难更大。这种转型可能面临内部阻力,因此需要从精益等社会技术的角度来看待这一问题。本文探讨了中小企业如何在其运营中实施数字化工具和技术。根据这些公司的经验、在实施过程中遇到的困难和吸取的教训,我们制定了一个以精益思维为驱动的数字化工具实施模型。研究结果公司倾向于首先实施有助于实时数据收集的数字化工具,并强调在不减少生产浪费的情况下引入数字化工具具有挑战性。该模式强调高层管理承诺、中层参与和操作员培训,以抵制变革。所有这些因素都与开创性著作中提出的社会技术精益捆绑要素不谋而合。此外,该研究还强调,经济激励并不一定是中小企业实施数字化工具的共同障碍,而是文化方面的障碍。 原创性/价值我们的论文通过吸取经验教训和纠正措施,围绕数字化的实施总结出相关知识,从而丰富了现有的知识体系。它使管理者能够将当前的实施过程与其他公司的实施过程进行基准比较,并在必要时采取纠正措施。
{"title":"An implementation model for socio-technical digital tools","authors":"Bassel Kassem, Matteo Rossini, Stefano Frecassetti, Federica Costa, Alberto Portioli Staudacher","doi":"10.1108/jmtm-06-2023-0230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-06-2023-0230","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>While Digitalisation is gaining momentum among practitioners and the scientific world, there is still a struggle to embark on the digitalisation journey successfully. The struggles are more significant for SMEs compared to large companies. Such transformation could face internal resistance, which evokes the need to put it into a socio-technical perspective such as lean. This paper investigates how SMEs could implement digital tools and technologies in their operations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>We relied on a multiple case study design in three SME manufacturing companies in Italy. Based on the experience of those companies, the struggles in the implementation and the lessons learned, we formulate an implementation model of digital tools driven by lean thinking.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>Companies tend to implement first digital tools that help with real-time data collection and stress that introducing digital tools becomes challenging without reducing waste in production. The model stresses top management commitment, middle-line involvement and operator training to resist change. All these factors coincide with socio-technical lean bundles developed by seminal works. In addition, the study highlights that financial incentives are not necessarily the common barrier to digital tools implementation in SMEs but rather the cultural aspect.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>Our paper enriches the extant body of knowledge by deriving knowledge around digitalisation implementation through lessons learned and corrective actions. It allows managers to benchmark and compare the current state of the implementation process with that of other companies and the one proposed to make corrective actions when necessary.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":16301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140580530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fourth industrial (r)evolution? Investigating the use of technology bundles and performance implications 第四次工业(再)进化?调查技术捆绑的使用和对绩效的影响
IF 7.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI: 10.1108/jmtm-07-2023-0299
Krisztina Demeter, Levente Szász, Béla-Gergely Rácz, Lehel-Zoltán Györfy

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate how different manufacturing technologies are bundled together and how these bundles influence operations performance and, indirectly, business performance. With the emergence of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies, manufacturing companies can use a wide variety of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMT) to build an efficient and effective production system. Nevertheless, the literature offers little guidance on how these technologies, including novel I4.0 technologies, should be combined in practice and how these combinations might have a different impact on performance.

Design/methodology/approach

Using a survey study of 165 manufacturing plants from 11 different countries, we use factor analysis to empirically derive three distinct manufacturing technology bundles and structural equation modeling to quantify their relationship with operations and business performance.

Findings

Our findings support an evolutionary rather than a revolutionary perspective. I4.0 technologies build on traditional manufacturing technologies and do not constitute a separate direction that would point towards a fundamental digital transformation of companies within our sample. Performance effects are rather weak: out of the three technology bundles identified, only “automation and robotization” have a positive influence on cost efficiency, while “base technologies” and “data-enabled technologies” do not offer a competitive advantage, neither in terms of cost nor in terms of differentiation. Furthermore, while the business performance impact is positive, it is quite weak, suggesting that financial returns on technology investments might require longer time periods.

Originality/value

Relying on a complementarity approach, our research offers a novel perspective on technology implementation in the I4.0 era by investigating novel and traditional manufacturing technologies together.

本文旨在研究如何将不同的制造技术捆绑在一起,以及这些捆绑技术如何影响运营绩效并间接影响企业绩效。随着工业 4.0(I4.0)技术的出现,制造企业可以利用各种先进制造技术(AMT)来构建高效的生产系统。然而,对于这些技术(包括新型 I4.0 技术)在实践中应如何组合,以及这些组合如何对绩效产生不同的影响,文献几乎没有提供指导。设计/方法/途径我们对 11 个不同国家的 165 家制造工厂进行了调查研究,利用因子分析和结构方程模型对它们与运营和业务绩效之间的关系进行了量化。I4.0 技术建立在传统制造技术的基础上,并不构成一个独立的方向,无法从根本上实现样本公司的数字化转型。绩效效应相当微弱:在确定的三种技术组合中,只有 "自动化和机器人化 "对成本效率产生了积极影响,而 "基础技术 "和 "数据化技术 "无论在成本方面还是在差异化方面都没有提供竞争优势。此外,虽然对业务绩效的影响是积极的,但这种影响相当微弱,这表明技术投资的财务回报可能需要更长的时间周期。
{"title":"Fourth industrial (r)evolution? Investigating the use of technology bundles and performance implications","authors":"Krisztina Demeter, Levente Szász, Béla-Gergely Rácz, Lehel-Zoltán Györfy","doi":"10.1108/jmtm-07-2023-0299","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-07-2023-0299","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>The purpose of this paper is to investigate how different manufacturing technologies are bundled together and how these bundles influence operations performance and, indirectly, business performance. With the emergence of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies, manufacturing companies can use a wide variety of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMT) to build an efficient and effective production system. Nevertheless, the literature offers little guidance on how these technologies, including novel I4.0 technologies, should be combined in practice and how these combinations might have a different impact on performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>Using a survey study of 165 manufacturing plants from 11 different countries, we use factor analysis to empirically derive three distinct manufacturing technology bundles and structural equation modeling to quantify their relationship with operations and business performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>Our findings support an evolutionary rather than a revolutionary perspective. I4.0 technologies build on traditional manufacturing technologies and do not constitute a separate direction that would point towards a fundamental digital transformation of companies within our sample. Performance effects are rather weak: out of the three technology bundles identified, only “automation and robotization” have a positive influence on cost efficiency, while “base technologies” and “data-enabled technologies” do not offer a competitive advantage, neither in terms of cost nor in terms of differentiation. Furthermore, while the business performance impact is positive, it is quite weak, suggesting that financial returns on technology investments might require longer time periods.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>Relying on a complementarity approach, our research offers a novel perspective on technology implementation in the I4.0 era by investigating novel and traditional manufacturing technologies together.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":16301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management","volume":"221 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140629064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An activity theory analysis of digital innovation orchestration in Industry 4.0 对工业 4.0 数字创新协调的活动理论分析
IF 7.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI: 10.1108/jmtm-09-2023-0419
Carlos Alberto Carbajal Piña, Nuran Acur, Dilek Cetindamar

Purpose

This paper explores the orchestration of digital innovation in Industry 4.0 organisations.

Design/methodology/approach

The study applies the activity theory to explorative multiple case studies. Observations of innovation activities in five business cases take place at two large international organisations.

Findings

The results underline five logics of action that drive digital innovation: (1) digital transformation, (2) technology translation, (3) catalyst agents, (4) digital thread and (5) empowerment. Further, the case study organisations highlight the importance of developing a sustainable culture capable of continuously adopting new technologies, processes and infrastructure that will allow the management of digital innovations.

Originality/value

The study empirically shows the motivations and challenges in orchestrating digital innovation in Industry 4.0 organisations.

本文探讨了工业 4.0 组织中数字创新的协调问题。研究将活动理论应用于探索性多案例研究。研究结果研究结果强调了推动数字化创新的五种行动逻辑:(1)数字化转型;(2)技术转化;(3)催化剂;(4)数字化线程;(5)授权。此外,案例研究组织强调了发展可持续文化的重要性,这种文化能够不断采用新技术、新流程和新基础设施,从而实现数字化创新管理。
{"title":"An activity theory analysis of digital innovation orchestration in Industry 4.0","authors":"Carlos Alberto Carbajal Piña, Nuran Acur, Dilek Cetindamar","doi":"10.1108/jmtm-09-2023-0419","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-09-2023-0419","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>This paper explores the orchestration of digital innovation in Industry 4.0 organisations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>The study applies the activity theory to explorative multiple case studies. Observations of innovation activities in five business cases take place at two large international organisations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>The results underline five logics of action that drive digital innovation: (1) digital transformation, (2) technology translation, (3) catalyst agents, (4) digital thread and (5) empowerment. Further, the case study organisations highlight the importance of developing a sustainable culture capable of continuously adopting new technologies, processes and infrastructure that will allow the management of digital innovations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>The study empirically shows the motivations and challenges in orchestrating digital innovation in Industry 4.0 organisations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":16301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140580529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating the impact of smart manufacturing on firms' operational and financial performance 调查智能制造对企业运营和财务业绩的影响
IF 7.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI: 10.1108/jmtm-05-2023-0190
Francesco Arcidiacono, Florian Schupp

Purpose

Smart manufacturing (SM) lies at the core of Industry 4.0. Uniform adoption of SM across business partners is crucial to exploit its value creation potential. However, firms' willingness to invest in SM is limited by insufficient or inconclusive evidence on its performance-related benefits. To close this gap, this paper develops and tests a model linking SM adoption to firms' financial performance. Improvements along the four dimensions of operational performance (i.e. cost quality, delivery and flexibility) mediate this relation.

Design/methodology/approach

This study follows an empirical research approach. In particular, survey data from 234 automotive component suppliers are analyzed via covariance-based structural equation modeling to explore the link between SM adoption and operational performance. Survey data are then matched with secondary data from balance sheets of 81 firms to investigate the impact of SM on financial performance via partial least square structural equation modeling.

Findings

Findings highlight that adoption of SM results in improvements in cost, quality, delivery performance, thus suggesting that SM is a mean to overcome performance trade-offs. Improvements in operational performance enabled by SM do not give rise to superior financial performance, thus implying that SM might support firms in maintaining the competitive position in the market, but could be insufficient to generate higher margin.

Originality/value

Results have implications for SM research and for manufacturing executives engaged in the adoption of SM, as they provide a detailed analysis of the impact of SM on operational performance and clarify the effect that SM adoption has on financial performance.

目的智能制造(SM)是工业 4.0 的核心。各业务合作伙伴统一采用智能制造技术对于挖掘其创造价值的潜力至关重要。然而,由于没有充分或确凿的证据表明智能制造能带来与绩效相关的益处,企业投资智能制造的意愿受到了限制。为了弥补这一不足,本文建立并测试了一个将企业采用 SM 与企业财务绩效挂钩的模型。运营绩效的四个维度(即成本、质量、交付和灵活性)的改善是这一关系的中介。特别是,通过基于协方差的结构方程模型分析了来自 234 家汽车零部件供应商的调查数据,以探讨 SM 应用与运营绩效之间的联系。然后将调查数据与 81 家公司资产负债表中的二手数据进行匹配,通过偏最小二乘法结构方程模型研究 SM 对财务绩效的影响。研究结果研究结果表明,采用 SM 可以改善成本、质量和交付绩效,从而表明 SM 是克服绩效权衡的一种手段。原创性/价值研究结果对 SM 研究和参与采用 SM 的制造业高管具有重要意义,因为它们详细分析了 SM 对运营绩效的影响,并阐明了采用 SM 对财务绩效的影响。
{"title":"Investigating the impact of smart manufacturing on firms' operational and financial performance","authors":"Francesco Arcidiacono, Florian Schupp","doi":"10.1108/jmtm-05-2023-0190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-05-2023-0190","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>Smart manufacturing (SM) lies at the core of Industry 4.0. Uniform adoption of SM across business partners is crucial to exploit its value creation potential. However, firms' willingness to invest in SM is limited by insufficient or inconclusive evidence on its performance-related benefits. To close this gap, this paper develops and tests a model linking SM adoption to firms' financial performance. Improvements along the four dimensions of operational performance (i.e. cost quality, delivery and flexibility) mediate this relation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>This study follows an empirical research approach. In particular, survey data from 234 automotive component suppliers are analyzed via covariance-based structural equation modeling to explore the link between SM adoption and operational performance. Survey data are then matched with secondary data from balance sheets of 81 firms to investigate the impact of SM on financial performance via partial least square structural equation modeling.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>Findings highlight that adoption of SM results in improvements in cost, quality, delivery performance, thus suggesting that SM is a mean to overcome performance trade-offs. Improvements in operational performance enabled by SM do not give rise to superior financial performance, thus implying that SM might support firms in maintaining the competitive position in the market, but could be insufficient to generate higher margin.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>Results have implications for SM research and for manufacturing executives engaged in the adoption of SM, as they provide a detailed analysis of the impact of SM on operational performance and clarify the effect that SM adoption has on financial performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":16301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140580324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Food supply chain resilience in major disruptions 食品供应链在重大干扰中的复原力
IF 7.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.1108/jmtm-02-2022-0081
Pauline Anne Found, Dnyaneshwar Mogale, Ziran Xu, Jianhao Yang

Purpose

Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19) is a global pandemic that emerged at the end of 2019 and caused disruptions in global supply chains, particularly in the food supply chains that exposed the vulnerability of today’s food supply chain in a major disruption which provided a unique research opportunity. This review explores the current research direction for food supply chain resilience and identifies gaps for future research in preparing for future major global pandemics.

Design/methodology/approach

This article presents a review of food supply chain resilience followed a systematic literature review of the business and management-based studies related to the food supply chain in Covid-19 published between December 2019 and December 2021 to identify the immediate issues and responses that need to be addressed in the event of future disruptions in food supply chains due to new global health threats.

Findings

The study revealed the need for more literature on food supply chain resilience, particularly resilience to a major global pandemic. The study also uncovered the sequence of events in a major pandemic and identified some strategies for building resilience to potential future risks of such an event.

Research limitations/implications

The limitations of this study are apparent. Firstly, the selection of databases is not comprehensive. Due to time limitations, authoritative publishers such as Springer, Emerald, Wiley and Taylor & Francis were not selected. Secondly, a single author completed the literature quality testing and text analysis, possibly reducing the credibility of the results due to subjective bias. Thirdly, the selected literature are the studies published during the immediate event of Covid-19, and before January 2022, other research studies may have been completed but were still in the state of auditing at this time.

Originality/value

This paper is the first study that provides a detailed classification of the immediate challenges to the food supply chain faced in both upstream and downstream nodes during a major global disruption. For researchers, this clearly shows the immediate difficulties faced at each node of the food supply chain, which provides research topics for future studies.

目的科罗娜病毒病(Covid-19)是 2019 年底出现的一种全球性大流行病,它对全球供应链,特别是食品供应链造成了破坏,暴露了当今食品供应链在重大破坏中的脆弱性,这提供了一个难得的研究机会。本综述探讨了当前食品供应链抗灾能力的研究方向,并指出了在为未来全球大流行病做准备方面未来研究的差距。设计/方法/途径本文对食品供应链的复原力进行了综述,随后对 2019 年 12 月至 2021 年 12 月期间发表的与科威德-19 食品供应链相关的基于商业和管理的研究进行了系统的文献综述,以确定未来因新的全球健康威胁而导致食品供应链中断时需要解决的直接问题和应对措施。研究还揭示了大流行病的事件顺序,并确定了一些应对此类事件未来潜在风险的复原力建设策略。首先,数据库的选择并不全面。由于时间有限,没有选择 Springer、Emerald、Wiley 和 Taylor & Francis 等权威出版商。其次,只有一位作者完成了文献质量检测和文本分析,可能会因主观偏见而降低结果的可信度。第三,所选文献是在科威德-19 事件刚发生时和 2022 年 1 月之前发表的研究,其他研究可能已经完成,但此时仍处于审核状态。原创性/价值本文是第一份对全球重大混乱事件中食品供应链上下游节点所面临的直接挑战进行详细分类的研究。对于研究人员来说,这清楚地表明了食品供应链各节点所面临的直接困难,为今后的研究提供了研究课题。
{"title":"Food supply chain resilience in major disruptions","authors":"Pauline Anne Found, Dnyaneshwar Mogale, Ziran Xu, Jianhao Yang","doi":"10.1108/jmtm-02-2022-0081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-02-2022-0081","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19) is a global pandemic that emerged at the end of 2019 and caused disruptions in global supply chains, particularly in the food supply chains that exposed the vulnerability of today’s food supply chain in a major disruption which provided a unique research opportunity. This review explores the current research direction for food supply chain resilience and identifies gaps for future research in preparing for future major global pandemics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>This article presents a review of food supply chain resilience followed a systematic literature review of the business and management-based studies related to the food supply chain in Covid-19 published between December 2019 and December 2021 to identify the immediate issues and responses that need to be addressed in the event of future disruptions in food supply chains due to new global health threats.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>The study revealed the need for more literature on food supply chain resilience, particularly resilience to a major global pandemic. The study also uncovered the sequence of events in a major pandemic and identified some strategies for building resilience to potential future risks of such an event.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\u0000<p>The limitations of this study are apparent. Firstly, the selection of databases is not comprehensive. Due to time limitations, authoritative publishers such as Springer, Emerald, Wiley and Taylor &amp; Francis were not selected. Secondly, a single author completed the literature quality testing and text analysis, possibly reducing the credibility of the results due to subjective bias. Thirdly, the selected literature are the studies published during the immediate event of Covid-19, and before January 2022, other research studies may have been completed but were still in the state of auditing at this time.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>This paper is the first study that provides a detailed classification of the immediate challenges to the food supply chain faced in both upstream and downstream nodes during a major global disruption. For researchers, this clearly shows the immediate difficulties faced at each node of the food supply chain, which provides research topics for future studies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":16301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140315328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1