首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Neuro-Oncology最新文献

英文 中文
A case series and review of stereotactic body radiation therapy for contiguous multilevel spine metastases. 连续多水平脊柱转移瘤立体定向体放射治疗的病例系列和回顾。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04863-4
S Adida, S Taori, S Bhatia, M R Kann, S A Burton, J C Flickinger, A C Olson, R K Sefcik, Pascal O Zinn, Peter C Gerszten

Purpose: A majority of published series report on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for 1-2 contiguous vertebral levels due to concerns regarding setup accuracy and radiation toxicity. This study evaluates patients with metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous levels treated with SBRT and augments its findings with a review of other studies investigating multilevel spine SBRT.

Methods: Analysis of a prospectively collected database of 49 patients with 55 metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous vertebral levels treated with SBRT at a single institution (2002-2023) was performed. Outcomes identified included local failure (LF), pain response, overall survival, and toxicity. The median single-fraction prescription dose was 15 Gy (range: 8-18); multifractionated treatment utilized prescription doses of 18-30 Gy in 2-5 fractions.

Results: Median follow-up was 7 months (range: 1-103). The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year cumulative incidence rates of LF were 7%, 11%, and 11%, respectively. No prognostic factors were associated with LF. Pain was reported to improve or remain stable for 49 lesions (89%). Ten adverse radiation events (18%) were identified; pain flare (5%), dermatitis (4%), and vertebral compression fracture (VCF, 9%). The 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year cumulative incidence rates of VCF were 4%, 7%, and 7%, respectively. No instances of esophageal toxicity or myelopathy were observed.

Conclusions: This study of multilevel SBRT is one of the largest to investigate outcomes in this challenging clinical scenario. Spine SBRT confers low rates of LF and toxicity for patients with multilevel disease, which was previously considered a relative contraindication. Spine SBRT may be considered in this patient population instead of low-dose palliative RT.

目的:由于对设置准确性和辐射毒性的担忧,大多数已发表的系列研究报告都是针对1-2个连续椎体水平的立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)。本研究评估了接受SBRT治疗的椎体转移≥3个连续水平的患者,并对其他研究多水平脊柱SBRT的结果进行了回顾:方法:对前瞻性收集的数据库进行分析,该数据库包含在一家机构接受SBRT治疗的49例55个连续椎体水平≥3个的转移瘤患者(2002-2023年)。确定的结果包括局部失败(LF)、疼痛反应、总生存率和毒性。单次分次处方剂量的中位数为15 Gy(范围:8-18);多分次治疗的处方剂量为18-30 Gy,分2-5次进行:中位随访时间为 7 个月(范围:1-103)。6个月、1年和2年的LF累积发病率分别为7%、11%和11%。没有预后因素与 LF 相关。据报告,49 例病变(89%)的疼痛有所改善或保持稳定。共发现 10 例放射不良事件(18%):疼痛复发(5%)、皮炎(4%)和椎体压缩性骨折(VCF,9%)。椎体压缩性骨折的 3 个月、6 个月和 1 年累计发生率分别为 4%、7% 和 7%。未观察到食管毒性或脊髓病变:这项关于多水平 SBRT 的研究是在这种具有挑战性的临床情况下进行的规模最大的成果研究之一。脊柱SBRT为多层次疾病患者带来了低LF率和低毒性,而多层次疾病以前被认为是相对禁忌症。脊柱SBRT可替代低剂量姑息性RT用于此类患者。
{"title":"A case series and review of stereotactic body radiation therapy for contiguous multilevel spine metastases.","authors":"S Adida, S Taori, S Bhatia, M R Kann, S A Burton, J C Flickinger, A C Olson, R K Sefcik, Pascal O Zinn, Peter C Gerszten","doi":"10.1007/s11060-024-04863-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04863-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A majority of published series report on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for 1-2 contiguous vertebral levels due to concerns regarding setup accuracy and radiation toxicity. This study evaluates patients with metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous levels treated with SBRT and augments its findings with a review of other studies investigating multilevel spine SBRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of a prospectively collected database of 49 patients with 55 metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous vertebral levels treated with SBRT at a single institution (2002-2023) was performed. Outcomes identified included local failure (LF), pain response, overall survival, and toxicity. The median single-fraction prescription dose was 15 Gy (range: 8-18); multifractionated treatment utilized prescription doses of 18-30 Gy in 2-5 fractions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up was 7 months (range: 1-103). The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year cumulative incidence rates of LF were 7%, 11%, and 11%, respectively. No prognostic factors were associated with LF. Pain was reported to improve or remain stable for 49 lesions (89%). Ten adverse radiation events (18%) were identified; pain flare (5%), dermatitis (4%), and vertebral compression fracture (VCF, 9%). The 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year cumulative incidence rates of VCF were 4%, 7%, and 7%, respectively. No instances of esophageal toxicity or myelopathy were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study of multilevel SBRT is one of the largest to investigate outcomes in this challenging clinical scenario. Spine SBRT confers low rates of LF and toxicity for patients with multilevel disease, which was previously considered a relative contraindication. Spine SBRT may be considered in this patient population instead of low-dose palliative RT.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on overall survival in spinal low-grade gliomas: a propensity score-matched analysis. 辅助放疗对脊柱低级别胶质瘤患者总生存期的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04880-3
Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Sruthi Ranganathan, Harry Hoang, Abdul Karim Ghaith, Mohamad Bydon, Adrian Elmi-Terander

Introduction: Spinal low-grade gliomas (sLGGs) are a group of tumors that arise from glial cells in the spinal cord. Current evidence supporting the use of adjuvant radiotherapy for the management of sLGG is lacking. We hence aimed to compare overall survival rates in patients receiving surgery alone with those receiving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy.

Methods: The NCDB, a large, nationwide, US-based cancer registry was used. Relevant cases were identified using the following ICD-O-3 histological codes: 9382, 9384, 9400, 9410, 9411, 9420, 9421, 9424, 9425, and 9450, along with the ICD-O-3 topographical codes for spinal meninges (C70.1) and spinal cord (C72.0), excluding spinal ependymomas. Overall survival was the primary outcome. Propensity score matching 1:1 was used to balance the cohorts prior to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Results: A total of 552 patients were included in the study, with 440 in the surgery alone group and 156 in the surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy group. Patients in the surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy group were significantly older (median age 40.0 vs. 24.0 years, p < 0.001), and exhibited higher proportions of WHO grade 2 tumors (p < 0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was more frequently administered in the surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy group (23% vs. 7%, p < 0.001). Overall, adjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with improved survival, with a significantly higher mortality in the radiotherapy group before propensity score matching (p < 0.0001). After matching, the difference in overall survival was no longer significant (p = 0.11).

Conclusion: This study found no significant overall survival benefit associated with the use of adjuvant radiotherapy for spinal low-grade gliomas (sLGG). Although patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy initially demonstrated higher mortality rates, this difference was largely due to confounding factors such as more advanced disease in this group.

简介:脊髓低级别胶质瘤(sLGGs脊髓低级别胶质瘤(sinal low-grade gliomas,sLGGs)是一类由脊髓胶质细胞产生的肿瘤。目前尚缺乏证据支持使用辅助放疗来治疗脊髓低级别胶质瘤。因此,我们旨在比较单纯接受手术治疗的患者与接受手术加辅助放疗的患者的总生存率:方法:我们使用了美国全国范围内的大型癌症登记系统 NCDB。相关病例通过以下ICD-O-3组织学代码确定:9382、9384、9400、9410、9411、9420、9421、9424、9425和9450,以及脊髓脑膜(C70.1)和脊髓(C72.0)的ICD-O-3地形代码,不包括脊髓外胚瘤。总生存期是主要结果。在进行 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析之前,采用倾向评分匹配 1:1 来平衡组群:研究共纳入了552名患者,其中单纯手术组440人,手术加辅助放疗组156人。手术与辅助放疗组患者的年龄明显偏大(中位年龄为 40.0 岁对 24.0 岁,P 结论:该研究发现,手术与辅助放疗对患者的总生存期没有明显的益处:本研究发现,脊柱低级别胶质瘤(sLGG)患者接受辅助放疗并不能明显提高总生存率。虽然最初接受辅助放疗的患者死亡率较高,但这种差异主要是由于该组患者的疾病更晚期等混杂因素造成的。
{"title":"The impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on overall survival in spinal low-grade gliomas: a propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Sruthi Ranganathan, Harry Hoang, Abdul Karim Ghaith, Mohamad Bydon, Adrian Elmi-Terander","doi":"10.1007/s11060-024-04880-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04880-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spinal low-grade gliomas (sLGGs) are a group of tumors that arise from glial cells in the spinal cord. Current evidence supporting the use of adjuvant radiotherapy for the management of sLGG is lacking. We hence aimed to compare overall survival rates in patients receiving surgery alone with those receiving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The NCDB, a large, nationwide, US-based cancer registry was used. Relevant cases were identified using the following ICD-O-3 histological codes: 9382, 9384, 9400, 9410, 9411, 9420, 9421, 9424, 9425, and 9450, along with the ICD-O-3 topographical codes for spinal meninges (C70.1) and spinal cord (C72.0), excluding spinal ependymomas. Overall survival was the primary outcome. Propensity score matching 1:1 was used to balance the cohorts prior to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 552 patients were included in the study, with 440 in the surgery alone group and 156 in the surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy group. Patients in the surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy group were significantly older (median age 40.0 vs. 24.0 years, p < 0.001), and exhibited higher proportions of WHO grade 2 tumors (p < 0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was more frequently administered in the surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy group (23% vs. 7%, p < 0.001). Overall, adjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with improved survival, with a significantly higher mortality in the radiotherapy group before propensity score matching (p < 0.0001). After matching, the difference in overall survival was no longer significant (p = 0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found no significant overall survival benefit associated with the use of adjuvant radiotherapy for spinal low-grade gliomas (sLGG). Although patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy initially demonstrated higher mortality rates, this difference was largely due to confounding factors such as more advanced disease in this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Magnetic resonance imaging techniques for monitoring glioma response to chemoradiotherapy. 用于监测胶质瘤对化放疗反应的磁共振成像技术。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04856-3
Liam S P Lawrence, Pejman J Maralani, Sunit Das, Arjun Sahgal, Greg J Stanisz, Angus Z Lau

Purpose: Treatment response assessment for gliomas currently uses changes in tumour size as measured with T1- and T2-weighted MRI. However, changes in tumour size may occur many weeks after therapy completion and are confounded by radiation treatment effects. Advanced MRI techniques sensitive to tumour physiology may provide complementary information to evaluate tumour response at early timepoints during therapy. The objective of this review is to provide a summary of the history and current knowledge regarding advanced MRI techniques for early treatment response evaluation in glioma.

Methods: The literature survey included perfusion MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging, quantitative magnetization transfer imaging, and chemical exchange transfer MRI. Select articles spanning the history of each technique as applied to treatment response evaluation in glioma were chosen. This report is a narrative review, not formally systematic.

Results: Chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging potentially offers the earliest method to detect tumour response due to changes in metabolism. Diffusion-weighted imaging is sensitive to changes in tumour cellularity later during radiotherapy and is prognostic for progression-free and overall survival. Substantial evidence suggests that perfusion MRI can differentiate between tumour recurrence and treatment effect, but consensus regarding acquisition, processing, and interpretation is still lacking. Magnetization transfer imaging shows promise for detecting subtle white matter damage which could indicate tumour invasion, but more research in this area is needed.

Conclusion: Advanced MRI techniques show potential for early treatment response assessment, but each technique alone lacks specificity. Multiparametric imaging may be necessary to aid biological interpretation and enable treatment guidance.

目的:胶质瘤的治疗反应评估目前使用 T1 和 T2 加权磁共振成像测量肿瘤大小的变化。然而,肿瘤大小的变化可能发生在治疗结束后数周,而且会受到放射治疗效果的影响。对肿瘤生理学敏感的先进磁共振成像技术可提供补充信息,以评估治疗期间早期时间点的肿瘤反应。本综述旨在总结先进磁共振成像技术用于胶质瘤早期治疗反应评估的历史和现有知识:文献调查包括灌注磁共振成像、弥散加权成像、定量磁化转移成像和化学交换转移磁共振成像。选取的文章跨越了每种技术应用于胶质瘤治疗反应评估的历史。本报告为叙述性综述,并非正式的系统性综述:结果:化学交换饱和转移成像可能是最早检测新陈代谢变化引起的肿瘤反应的方法。弥散加权成像对放疗后期肿瘤细胞的变化很敏感,并可预测无进展生存期和总生存期。大量证据表明,灌注 MRI 可以区分肿瘤复发和治疗效果,但在获取、处理和解释方面仍缺乏共识。磁化转移成像有望检测到可能预示肿瘤侵犯的细微白质损伤,但这一领域还需要更多的研究:结论:先进的磁共振成像技术显示出早期治疗反应评估的潜力,但每种技术本身都缺乏特异性。多参数成像可能是辅助生物学解释和指导治疗所必需的。
{"title":"Magnetic resonance imaging techniques for monitoring glioma response to chemoradiotherapy.","authors":"Liam S P Lawrence, Pejman J Maralani, Sunit Das, Arjun Sahgal, Greg J Stanisz, Angus Z Lau","doi":"10.1007/s11060-024-04856-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04856-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Treatment response assessment for gliomas currently uses changes in tumour size as measured with T<sub>1</sub>- and T<sub>2</sub>-weighted MRI. However, changes in tumour size may occur many weeks after therapy completion and are confounded by radiation treatment effects. Advanced MRI techniques sensitive to tumour physiology may provide complementary information to evaluate tumour response at early timepoints during therapy. The objective of this review is to provide a summary of the history and current knowledge regarding advanced MRI techniques for early treatment response evaluation in glioma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature survey included perfusion MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging, quantitative magnetization transfer imaging, and chemical exchange transfer MRI. Select articles spanning the history of each technique as applied to treatment response evaluation in glioma were chosen. This report is a narrative review, not formally systematic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging potentially offers the earliest method to detect tumour response due to changes in metabolism. Diffusion-weighted imaging is sensitive to changes in tumour cellularity later during radiotherapy and is prognostic for progression-free and overall survival. Substantial evidence suggests that perfusion MRI can differentiate between tumour recurrence and treatment effect, but consensus regarding acquisition, processing, and interpretation is still lacking. Magnetization transfer imaging shows promise for detecting subtle white matter damage which could indicate tumour invasion, but more research in this area is needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced MRI techniques show potential for early treatment response assessment, but each technique alone lacks specificity. Multiparametric imaging may be necessary to aid biological interpretation and enable treatment guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epidemiology of glioblastoma in Pakistan: a secondary analysis of the Pakistan Brain Tumor Epidemiology Study (PBTES). 巴基斯坦胶质母细胞瘤的流行病学:巴基斯坦脑肿瘤流行病学研究(PBTES)的二次分析。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04872-3
Hammad Atif Irshad, Syed Balaj Ali Rizvi, Mohammad Hamza Bajwa, Muhammad Usman Khalid, Mashal Murad Shah, Syed Ather Enam

Purpose: The incidence and outcomes of glioblastoma (GBM) patients in Pakistan remain unassessed owing to a lack of cancer registries and the absence of population-based studies. For any specific population-based oncological intervention, epidemiology must be studied. Therefore, this study aims to examine the epidemiological characteristics of glioblastoma patients in Pakistan, as part of a secondary analysis of a nationwide epidemiological study.

Methods: Data comprising of sociodemographic, tumor and treatment characteristics of 2750 patients from the Pakistan Brain Tumor Epidemiology Study were extracted and analyzed for cases between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019. Chi-square tests identified outcome and treatment differences. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.

Results: A total of 260 GBM cases were analyzed, with a mean diagnosis age of 45 years. Males accounted for 68.8%. Most patients were from a middle- (39.6%) or lower-income (42.7%) socioeconomic background and received care from a public institution (63.8%). GBM tumors were mainly located in the frontal lobe with similar proportions of right and left laterality. A median distance of 119 km was traveled for oncological care, and the mean time to surgery from the initial radiological diagnosis was 72 days. Gross total resection was achieved in 47.3% of first surgeries, with 23 reoperations for recurrence. At the end of the study period, 33% of the GBM cohort was recorded as alive with 47% being lost to follow-up.

Conclusion: Our analysis is the first population-based analysis of GBM in Pakistan. This epidemiologic study can serve as a basis for future research in etiology, treatment, and outcomes for glioblastoma in the Pakistani population.

目的:由于缺乏癌症登记和基于人群的研究,巴基斯坦胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者的发病率和治疗效果仍未得到评估。对于任何特定人群的肿瘤干预,都必须对流行病学进行研究。因此,本研究旨在研究巴基斯坦胶质母细胞瘤患者的流行病学特征,作为全国流行病学研究二次分析的一部分:从巴基斯坦脑肿瘤流行病学研究中提取了2750名患者的社会人口学、肿瘤和治疗特征数据,并对2019年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间的病例进行了分析。通过卡方检验确定了结果和治疗差异。数据分析使用 SPSS 26 版本进行:共分析了260例GBM病例,平均诊断年龄为45岁。男性占 68.8%。大多数患者来自中等(39.6%)或低收入(42.7%)社会经济背景,并在公立机构接受治疗(63.8%)。GBM肿瘤主要位于额叶,左右侧的比例相似。接受肿瘤治疗的中位距离为119公里,从最初的放射诊断到手术的平均时间为72天。47.3%的首次手术实现了全切除,23例因复发再次手术。在研究结束时,33%的GBM患者存活,47%的患者失去随访:我们的分析是巴基斯坦首次基于人群的 GBM 分析。这项流行病学研究可作为今后研究巴基斯坦人群胶质母细胞瘤病因学、治疗和预后的基础。
{"title":"Epidemiology of glioblastoma in Pakistan: a secondary analysis of the Pakistan Brain Tumor Epidemiology Study (PBTES).","authors":"Hammad Atif Irshad, Syed Balaj Ali Rizvi, Mohammad Hamza Bajwa, Muhammad Usman Khalid, Mashal Murad Shah, Syed Ather Enam","doi":"10.1007/s11060-024-04872-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04872-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The incidence and outcomes of glioblastoma (GBM) patients in Pakistan remain unassessed owing to a lack of cancer registries and the absence of population-based studies. For any specific population-based oncological intervention, epidemiology must be studied. Therefore, this study aims to examine the epidemiological characteristics of glioblastoma patients in Pakistan, as part of a secondary analysis of a nationwide epidemiological study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data comprising of sociodemographic, tumor and treatment characteristics of 2750 patients from the Pakistan Brain Tumor Epidemiology Study were extracted and analyzed for cases between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019. Chi-square tests identified outcome and treatment differences. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 260 GBM cases were analyzed, with a mean diagnosis age of 45 years. Males accounted for 68.8%. Most patients were from a middle- (39.6%) or lower-income (42.7%) socioeconomic background and received care from a public institution (63.8%). GBM tumors were mainly located in the frontal lobe with similar proportions of right and left laterality. A median distance of 119 km was traveled for oncological care, and the mean time to surgery from the initial radiological diagnosis was 72 days. Gross total resection was achieved in 47.3% of first surgeries, with 23 reoperations for recurrence. At the end of the study period, 33% of the GBM cohort was recorded as alive with 47% being lost to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis is the first population-based analysis of GBM in Pakistan. This epidemiologic study can serve as a basis for future research in etiology, treatment, and outcomes for glioblastoma in the Pakistani population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1