Journal of Neuro-Oncology最新文献

Purpose: Postoperative bowel and bladder dysfunction (BBD) poses a significant risk following surgery of the sacral spinal segments and sacral nerve roots, particularly in neuro-oncology cases. The need for more reliable neuromonitoring techniques to enhance the safety of spine surgery is evident.

Methods: We conducted a case series comprising 60 procedures involving 56 patients, spanning from September 2022 to January 2024. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of sacral reflexes (bulbocavernosus and external urethral sphincter reflexes) and compared them with transcranial motor evoked potentials (TCMEP) incorporating anal sphincter (AS) and external urethral sphincter (EUS) recordings, as well as spontaneous electromyography (s-EMG) with AS and EUS recordings.

Results: Sacral reflexes demonstrated a specificity of 100% in predicting postoperative BBD, with a sensitivity of 73.33%. While sensitivity slightly decreased to 64.71% at the 1-month follow-up, it remained consistently high overall. TCMEP with AS/EUS recordings did not identify any instances of postoperative BBD, whereas s-EMG with AS/EUS recordings showed a sensitivity of 14.29% and a specificity of 97.14%.

Conclusion: Sacral reflex monitoring emerges as a robust adjunct to routine neuromonitoring, offering surgeons valuable predictive insights to potentially mitigate the occurrence of postoperative BBD.

Purpose: To report the outcomes of a large series of intracranial meningiomas (IMs) submitted to proton therapy (PT) with curative intent.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis on all consecutive IM patients treated between 2014 and 2021. The median PT prescription dose was 55.8 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and 66 GyRBE for benign/radiologically diagnosed and atypical/anaplastic IMs, respectively. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), overall survival (OS), and radionecrosis-free survival (RNFS) were evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable analysis was performed to identify potential prognostic factors for clinical outcomes. Toxicity was reported according to the latest Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

Results: Overall, 167 patients were included. With a median follow-up of 41 months (range, 6-99), twelve patients (7%) developed tumor local recurrence after a median time of 39 months. The 5-year LRFS was 88% for the entire cohort, with a significant difference between benign/radiologically diagnosed and atypical/anaplastic IMs (98% vs. 47%, p < 0.001); this significant difference was maintained also for the 5-year OS and the 5-year DRFS rates. Patients aged ≤ 56 years reported significantly better outcomes, whereas lower prescription doses and skull base location were associated with better RNFS rates. Two patients experienced G3 acute toxicities (1.2%), and three patients G3 late toxicities (1.8%). There were no G4-G5 adverse events.

Conclusion: PT proved to be effective with an acceptable toxicity profile. To the best of our knowledge this is one of the largest series including IM patients submitted to PT.

Purpose: Targeted treatment options for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases (BMs) may be combined with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to optimize survival. We assessed patient outcomes after SRS for NSCLC BMs, identifying survival trajectories associated with targetable mutations.

Methods: In this retrospective time-dependent analysis, we analyzed median overall survival of patients who received ≥ 1 SRS courses for BM from NSCLC from 2001 to 2021. We compared survival of patients with and without targetable mutations based on clinical variables and treatment.

Results: Among the 213 patients included, 87 (40.8%) had targetable mutations-primarily EGFR (22.5%)-and 126 (59.2%) did not. Patients with targetable mutations were more often female (63.2%, p <.001) and nonsmokers (58.6%, p <.001); had higher initial lung-molGPA (2.0 vs. 1.5, p <.001) and lower cumulative tumor volume (3.7 vs. 10.6 cm³, p <.001); and received more concurrent (55.2% vs. 36.5%, p =.007) and total (median 3 vs. 2, p <.001) systemic therapies. These patients had lower mortality rates (74.7% vs. 91.3%, p <.001) and risk (HR 0.298 [95%CI 0.190-0.469], p <.001) and longer median overall survival (20.2 vs. 7.4 months, p <.001), including survival ≥ 3 years (p =.001). Survival was best predicted by SRS with tumor resection in patients with non-targetable mutations (HR 0.491 [95%CI 0.318-757], p =.001) and by systemic therapy with SRS for those with targetable mutations (HR 0.124 [95%CI 0.013-1.153], p =.067).

Conclusion: The presence of targetable mutations enhances survival in patients receiving SRS for NSCLC BM, particularly when used with systemic therapies. Survival for patients without targetable mutations was longest with SRS and surgical resection. These results inform best practices for managing patients with NSCLC BM based on driver mutation status.

Purpose: Maximal-safe resection has been shown to improve overall survival in elderly patients with glioblastoma in observational studies, however, the only clinical trial comparing resection versus biopsy in elderly patients with surgically-accessible glioblastoma showed no improvements in overall survival. A meta-analysis is needed to assess whether surgical resection of glioblastoma in older patients improves surgical outcomes when compared to biopsy alone.

Methods: A search was conducted until October 9th, 2023, to identify published studies reporting the clinical outcomes of glioblastoma patients > 65 years undergoing resection or biopsy (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE). Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and complications. We analyzed mean difference (MD) and hazard ratio (HR) for survival outcomes. Postoperative complications were analyzed as a dichotomic categorical variable with risk ratio (RR).

Results: From 784 articles, 20 cohort studies and 1 randomized controlled trial met our inclusion criteria, considering 20,523 patients for analysis. Patients undergoing surgical resection had an overall survival MD of 6.13 months (CI 95%=2.43-9.82, p = < 0.001) with a HR of 0.43 (95% CI = 0.35-0.52, p = < 0.00001). The progression-free survival MD was 2.34 months (95%CI = 0.79-3.89, p = 0.003) with a 0.50 h favoring resection (95%CI = 0.37-0.68, p = < 0.00001). The complication RR was higher in the resection group favoring biopsy (1.49, 95%CI = 1.06-2.10).

Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests that upfront resection is associated with improved overall survival and progression-free survival in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma over biopsy. However, postoperative complications are more common with resection. Future clinical trials are essential to provide more robust evaluation in this challenging patient population.

Background: Intra-axial brain tumors persist as significant clinical challenges. Aggressive surgical resection carries risk of morbidity, and the blood-brain barrier (BBB) prevents optimal pharmacological interventions. There is a clear clinical demand for innovative and less invasive therapeutic strategies for patients, especially those that can augment established treatment protocols. Focused ultrasound (FUS) has emerged as a promising approach to manage brain tumors. Sonodynamic therapy (SDT), a subset of FUS, utilizes sonosensitizers activated by ultrasound waves to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) and induce tumor cell death.

Objective: This review explores the historical evolution and rationale behind SDT, focusing on its mechanisms of action and potential applications in brain tumor management.

Method: A systematic review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Results: Preclinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of various sonosensitizers, including 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), fluorescein, porphyrin derivatives, and nanoparticles, in conjunction with FUS for targeted tumor therapy and BBB disruption. Clinical trials have shown promising results in terms of safety and efficacy, although further research is needed to fully understand the potential adverse effects and optimize treatment protocols. Challenges such as skull thickness affecting FUS penetration, and the kinetics of BBB opening require careful consideration for the successful implementation of SDT in clinical practice. Future directions include comparative studies of different sonosensitizers, optimization of FUS parameters, and exploration of SDT's immunomodulatory effects.

Conclusion: SDT represents a promising frontier in the treatment of aggressive brain tumors, offering hope for improved patient outcomes.

Background: Interferon stimulated exonuclease gene 20 (ISG20) has been reported to be correlated with macrophage infiltration in glioblastoma (GBM) in previous bioinformatics-based studies. This study explores the exact effect of ISG20 on macrophage polarization in GBM.

Methods: ISG20 expression in GBM tissues and cells was determined by RT-qPCR and/or immunohistochemistry. GBM cells were co-cultured with M0 macrophages (PMA-stimulated THP-1 cells) in vitro, followed by flow cytometry and ELISA to analyze the M2 polarization of macrophages. Fluorescence-contained GBM cells were intracranially injected into nude mice along with M0 macrophages to generate orthotopic xenograft tumor models. Upstream regulator of ISG20 was predicted using bioinformatics. Loss- or gain-of-function assays of Fos like 2 (FOSL2) and ISG20 were performed in GBM cells. DNA methylation level of FOSL2 was analyzed by bisulfite sequencing analysis.

Results: ISG20 was found highly expressed in GBM tissues and cells. ISG20 silencing in GBM cells decreased CD206 and CD163 levels in the co-cultured macrophages and reduced secretion of IL-10 and TGF-β. It also enhanced survival of nude mice bearing xenograft tumors, blocked tumor growth, and suppressed M2 polarization of macrophages in vivo. FOSL2, highly expressed in GBM, bound to the ISG20 promoter to activate its transcription. FOSL2 silencing similarly blocked M2 polarization of macrophages, which was negated by ISG20 overexpression. The high FOSL2 expression in GBM was attributed to DNA hypomethylation.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that FOSL2 is highly expressed in GBM due to DNA hypomethylation. It activates transcription of ISG20, thus promoting M2 polarization of macrophages and GBM development.

Purpose: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor with a dismal prognosis of less than 2 years under maximal therapy. Despite the poor prognosis, small fractions of GBM patients seem to have a markedly longer survival than the vast majority of patients. Recently discovered intertumoral heterogeneity is thought to be responsible for this peculiarity, although the exact underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Here, we investigated the epigenetic contribution to survival.

Methods: GBM treatment-naïve samples from 53 patients, consisting of 12 extremely long-term survivors (eLTS) patients and 41 median-term survivors (MTS) patients, were collected for DNA methylation analysis. 865 859 CpG sites were examined and processed for detection of differentially methylated CpG positions (DMP) and regions (DMR) between both survival groups. Gene Ontology (GO) and pathway functional annotations were used to identify associated biological processes. Verification of these findings was done using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database.

Results: We identified 67 DMPs and 5 DMRs that were associated with genes and pathways - namely reduced interferon beta signaling, in MAPK signaling and in NTRK signaling - which play a role in survival in GBM.

Conclusion: In conclusion, baseline DNA methylation differences already present in treatment-naïve GBM samples are part of genes and pathways that play a role in the survival of these tumor types and therefore may explain part of the intrinsic heterogeneity that determines prognosis in GBM patients.

Purpose: Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become increasingly integrated clinically within neurosurgical oncology. This report reviews the cutting-edge technologies impacting tumor treatment and outcomes.

Methods: A rigorous literature search was performed with the aid of a research librarian to identify key articles referencing AI and related topics (machine learning (ML), computer vision (CV), augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), etc.) for neurosurgical care of brain or spinal tumors.

Results: Treatment of central nervous system (CNS) tumors is being improved through advances across AI-such as AL, CV, and AR/VR. AI aided diagnostic and prognostication tools can influence pre-operative patient experience, while automated tumor segmentation and total resection predictions aid surgical planning. Novel intra-operative tools can rapidly provide histopathologic tumor classification to streamline treatment strategies. Post-operative video analysis, paired with rich surgical simulations, can enhance training feedback and regimens.

Conclusion: While limited generalizability, bias, and patient data security are current concerns, the advent of federated learning, along with growing data consortiums, provides an avenue for increasingly safe, powerful, and effective AI platforms in the future.