首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Medical Toxicology最新文献

英文 中文
Intravenous Acetylcysteine: What Should Replace the Prescott "Three-Bag" Protocol? 静脉注射乙酰半胱氨酸:如何取代普雷斯科特 "三袋 "方案?
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI: 10.1007/s13181-024-01017-w
Kim-Long R Nguyen, Michael E Mullins
{"title":"Intravenous Acetylcysteine: What Should Replace the Prescott \"Three-Bag\" Protocol?","authors":"Kim-Long R Nguyen, Michael E Mullins","doi":"10.1007/s13181-024-01017-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13181-024-01017-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"348-349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436566/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141620139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neurologic Deficits Following Oral Misuse of the Nasal Decongestant Propylhexedrine. 口服误用鼻腔减充血剂丙氧芬后出现神经功能缺损。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1007/s13181-024-01025-w
Keahi M Horowitz, Emma Cassidy, Courtney Temple

Introduction: Propylhexedrine is an over-the-counter nasal decongestant used recreationally for amphetamine-like effects. Prior reports have associated intravenous misuse with brainstem dysfunction and diplopia. This is a case of propylhexedrine ingestion resulting in neurological impairment with associated MRI findings.

Case report: A 21-year-old man presented with neurologic symptoms after ingesting propylhexedrine extracted from a 250 mg nasal inhaler into a lemon juice solution following recommendations from an online forum. He also followed recommendations to simultaneously ingest 1 g L-arginine to theoretically mitigate the risk of vasoconstriction. He developed flushing and euphoria before falling asleep. He awoke 12 h later with dizziness, intractable vomiting, diplopia, ataxia, dysmetria, and spontaneous horizontal nystagmus. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed T2 enhancement concerning for vasogenic edema of the right posterior limbs of the internal capsule extending into the midbrain, cerebellar peduncles, and cerebellar white matter. Workup for primary vascular or autoimmune etiologies was unrevealing. Expanded drug testing was positive for mitragynine and THC. Blood analyzed via liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry was positive for propylhexedrine. On hospital day 6, the patient was discharged to physical rehabilitation with unresolved dysmetria and ataxia.

Discussion: Recreational oral misuse of propylhexedrine may be associated with neurologic injury. MRI findings in this case demonstrated vasogenic edema suggesting vasospasm as a possible etiology. Serum testing confirmed the presence of propylhexedrine. Although testing was also positive for mitragynine and THC, these have not been associated with similar neurologic deficits or MRI findings.

简介丙苯氧胺是一种非处方鼻腔减充血剂,具有类似苯丙胺的娱乐效果。之前的报告显示,静脉滥用会导致脑干功能障碍和复视。这是一例摄入丙基羟地平导致神经系统受损并伴有核磁共振成像结果的病例:病例报告:一名 21 岁男子根据网上论坛的建议,将从 250 毫克鼻吸入器中提取的丙基羟地平纳入柠檬汁溶液中,随后出现神经系统症状。他还按照建议同时摄入了 1 克左旋精氨酸,以从理论上降低血管收缩的风险。他在入睡前出现了潮红和兴奋。12 小时后,他因头晕、顽固性呕吐、复视、共济失调、构音障碍和自发性水平眼球震颤而醒来。磁共振成像(MRI)显示,右侧内囊后肢T2增强,血管源性水肿延伸至中脑、小脑脚和小脑白质。原发性血管性或自身免疫性病因检查未发现异常。扩大药物检测结果为丝氨酸和四氢大麻酚阳性。经液相色谱四极杆飞行时间质谱分析,血液中的丙基己二胺呈阳性。住院第 6 天,患者因构音障碍和共济失调症状未得到缓解而出院接受物理康复治疗:讨论:娱乐性口服滥用丙氧芬可能与神经系统损伤有关。该病例的磁共振成像结果显示存在血管源性水肿,这表明血管痉挛可能是病因之一。血清检测证实了丙氧芬的存在。虽然麻黄碱和四氢大麻酚的检测结果也呈阳性,但这些物质与类似的神经功能缺损或核磁共振成像结果并无关联。
{"title":"Neurologic Deficits Following Oral Misuse of the Nasal Decongestant Propylhexedrine.","authors":"Keahi M Horowitz, Emma Cassidy, Courtney Temple","doi":"10.1007/s13181-024-01025-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13181-024-01025-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Propylhexedrine is an over-the-counter nasal decongestant used recreationally for amphetamine-like effects. Prior reports have associated intravenous misuse with brainstem dysfunction and diplopia. This is a case of propylhexedrine ingestion resulting in neurological impairment with associated MRI findings.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 21-year-old man presented with neurologic symptoms after ingesting propylhexedrine extracted from a 250 mg nasal inhaler into a lemon juice solution following recommendations from an online forum. He also followed recommendations to simultaneously ingest 1 g L-arginine to theoretically mitigate the risk of vasoconstriction. He developed flushing and euphoria before falling asleep. He awoke 12 h later with dizziness, intractable vomiting, diplopia, ataxia, dysmetria, and spontaneous horizontal nystagmus. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed T2 enhancement concerning for vasogenic edema of the right posterior limbs of the internal capsule extending into the midbrain, cerebellar peduncles, and cerebellar white matter. Workup for primary vascular or autoimmune etiologies was unrevealing. Expanded drug testing was positive for mitragynine and THC. Blood analyzed via liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry was positive for propylhexedrine. On hospital day 6, the patient was discharged to physical rehabilitation with unresolved dysmetria and ataxia.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Recreational oral misuse of propylhexedrine may be associated with neurologic injury. MRI findings in this case demonstrated vasogenic edema suggesting vasospasm as a possible etiology. Serum testing confirmed the presence of propylhexedrine. Although testing was also positive for mitragynine and THC, these have not been associated with similar neurologic deficits or MRI findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"427-429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436568/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141893611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating a Novel Two-Bag N-Acetylcysteine Regimen for Acetaminophen Toxicity. 研究治疗对乙酰氨基酚毒性的新型双囊 N-乙酰半胱氨酸疗法
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI: 10.1007/s13181-024-01010-3
Kathryn A Glass, Zachary R Stoecker, Jenna LeRoy, Casey L Palmer, Jordan Stipek, Sean Boley

Background: Acetaminophen toxicity remains one of the most common causes of liver failure and is treated with a course of n-acetylcysteine (NAC). This exceptionally effective medication is traditionally administered using a complicated three-bag protocol that is prone to administration errors.

Objective: We aimed to assess whether switching to a novel two-bag protocol (150 mg/kg over 1 h followed by 150 mg/kg over 20 h) reduced administration errors while not increasing liver injury or anaphylactoid reactions.

Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of hospital encounters for patients with acetaminophen toxicity, comparing outcomes before and after the change from a three-bag protocol to a two-bag protocol at two affiliated institutions. The primary outcome was incidence of medication errors with secondary outcomes including acute liver injury (ALI) and incidence of non-anaphylactoid allergic reactions (NAAR). The study was approved by the health system's Institutional Review Board.

Results: 483 encounters were included for analysis (239 in the three-bag and 244 in the two-bag groups). NAAR were identified in 11 patients with no difference seen between groups. Similarly, no differences were seen in ALI. Medication administration errors were observed significantly less often in the two-bag group (OR 0.24) after adjusting for confounders.

Conclusion: Transitioning to a novel two-bag NAC regimen decreased administration errors. This adds to the literature that two-bag NAC regimens are not only safe but also may have significant benefits over the traditional NAC protocol.

背景:对乙酰氨基酚中毒仍是肝功能衰竭最常见的原因之一,通常采用正乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)治疗。这种非常有效的药物传统上使用复杂的三袋方案,容易出现用药错误:我们旨在评估改用新型双袋方案(1 小时内 150 毫克/千克,然后 20 小时内 150 毫克/千克)是否能减少用药错误,同时不增加肝损伤或过敏性反应:这是一项对对乙酰氨基酚中毒患者在医院就诊情况的回顾性病历审查,比较了两家附属医院将三袋方案改为两袋方案前后的结果。主要结果是用药错误发生率,次要结果包括急性肝损伤(ALI)和非过敏性过敏反应(NAAR)发生率。该研究获得了医疗系统机构审查委员会的批准:共纳入 483 例病例进行分析(三袋组 239 例,两袋组 244 例)。在 11 名患者中发现了 NAAR,组间无差异。同样,在 ALI 方面也未发现差异。在对混杂因素进行调整后,双袋组出现用药错误的频率明显降低(OR 0.24):结论:过渡到新型双袋 NAC 方案可减少用药错误。结论:过渡到新型双袋 NAC 方案可减少用药错误,这进一步说明双袋 NAC 方案不仅安全,而且与传统 NAC 方案相比具有显著优势。
{"title":"Investigating a Novel Two-Bag N-Acetylcysteine Regimen for Acetaminophen Toxicity.","authors":"Kathryn A Glass, Zachary R Stoecker, Jenna LeRoy, Casey L Palmer, Jordan Stipek, Sean Boley","doi":"10.1007/s13181-024-01010-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13181-024-01010-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acetaminophen toxicity remains one of the most common causes of liver failure and is treated with a course of n-acetylcysteine (NAC). This exceptionally effective medication is traditionally administered using a complicated three-bag protocol that is prone to administration errors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess whether switching to a novel two-bag protocol (150 mg/kg over 1 h followed by 150 mg/kg over 20 h) reduced administration errors while not increasing liver injury or anaphylactoid reactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective chart review of hospital encounters for patients with acetaminophen toxicity, comparing outcomes before and after the change from a three-bag protocol to a two-bag protocol at two affiliated institutions. The primary outcome was incidence of medication errors with secondary outcomes including acute liver injury (ALI) and incidence of non-anaphylactoid allergic reactions (NAAR). The study was approved by the health system's Institutional Review Board.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>483 encounters were included for analysis (239 in the three-bag and 244 in the two-bag groups). NAAR were identified in 11 patients with no difference seen between groups. Similarly, no differences were seen in ALI. Medication administration errors were observed significantly less often in the two-bag group (OR 0.24) after adjusting for confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transitioning to a novel two-bag NAC regimen decreased administration errors. This adds to the literature that two-bag NAC regimens are not only safe but also may have significant benefits over the traditional NAC protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"381-388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436688/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141590536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Delta-8 Tetrahydrocannabinol Exposures Reported to US Poison Centers: Variations Among US States and Regions and Associations with Public Policy. 向美国毒物中心报告的 Delta-8 四氢大麻酚暴露:美国各州和地区之间的差异以及与公共政策的关联。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-21 DOI: 10.1007/s13181-024-01030-z
Gary A Smith, Alice Burgess, Jaahnavi Badeti, Natalie I Rine, Christopher E Gaw, Leah K Middelberg, Henry A Spiller, Hannah L Hays

Introduction: This study investigated exposures involving ∆8-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆8-THC) reported to US poison centers (PCs), including variation among states and regions. It evaluated whether the ∆8-THC exposure rate was lower among states with ∆8-THC regulations and states where cannabis (∆9-THC) use was legal.

Methods: National Poison Data System data for ∆8-THC exposures in 2021-2022 were analyzed, including comparisons of state and regional population-based exposure rates.

Results: There were 4,925 exposures involving ∆8-THC as the primary substance reported to US PCs from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022, with 69.8% of these reported in the US South. The rate of exposure per 100,000 US population increased by 79.2% from 0.53 in 2021 to 0.95 in 2022. In 2022, the mean rate of ∆8-THC exposures in states where cannabis use was illegal was 1.64 per 100,000 population (95% CI: 1.08-2.20) compared with 0.52 (95% CI: 0.29-0.76) in states where cannabis use was legal (P = 0.0010). In 2022, the mean rate of ∆8-THC exposures in states where ∆8-THC was unregulated was 1.36 per 100,000 population (95% CI: 0.95-1.77) compared with 0.17 (95% CI: 0.06-0.27) in states where ∆8-THC was banned (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: The rate of ∆8-THC exposures reported to US PCs increased by 79% from 2021 to 2022, with the US South accounting for more than two-thirds of exposures. The rate of ∆8-THC exposures reported to PCs was significantly lower among states where ∆8-THC was banned and among states where cannabis use was legal. Consistent regulation of ∆8-THC across all states should be adopted.

简介:本研究调查了向美国毒物中心(PCs)报告的涉及∆8-四氢大麻酚(∆8-THC)的暴露情况,包括各州和各地区之间的差异。该研究评估了在∆8-THC 规定的州和大麻(∆9-THC)使用合法的州,∆8-THC 暴露率是否较低:方法:分析了 2021-2022 年全国毒物数据系统的 ∆8-THC 暴露数据,包括各州和地区人口暴露率的比较:从 2021 年 1 月 1 日到 2022 年 12 月 31 日,美国 PCs 共收到 4925 起以 ∆8-THC 为主要物质的暴露报告,其中 69.8%发生在美国南部。每 10 万美国人口的接触率从 2021 年的 0.53 上升到 2022 年的 0.95,上升了 79.2%。2022 年,在大麻使用非法的各州,每 100,000 人口接触 ∆8-THC 的平均比率为 1.64(95% CI:1.08-2.20),而在大麻使用合法的各州,这一比率为 0.52(95% CI:0.29-0.76)(P = 0.0010)。2022 年,在未∆8-THC 受管制的州,每 100,000 人中接触∆8-THC 的平均比率为 1.36(95% CI:0.95-1.77),而在禁∆8-THC 的州,这一比率为 0.17(95% CI:0.06-0.27)(P = 0.0010):从 2021 年到 2022 年,美国 PCs 报告的 ∆8-THC 暴露率增加了 79%,其中美国南部占三分之二以上。在禁止使用 ∆8-THC 的州和大麻使用合法的州,向 PC 报告的 ∆8-THC 暴露率明显较低。各州应对 ∆8-THC 采取一致的监管措施。
{"title":"Delta-8 Tetrahydrocannabinol Exposures Reported to US Poison Centers: Variations Among US States and Regions and Associations with Public Policy.","authors":"Gary A Smith, Alice Burgess, Jaahnavi Badeti, Natalie I Rine, Christopher E Gaw, Leah K Middelberg, Henry A Spiller, Hannah L Hays","doi":"10.1007/s13181-024-01030-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13181-024-01030-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigated exposures involving ∆8-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆8-THC) reported to US poison centers (PCs), including variation among states and regions. It evaluated whether the ∆8-THC exposure rate was lower among states with ∆8-THC regulations and states where cannabis (∆9-THC) use was legal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National Poison Data System data for ∆8-THC exposures in 2021-2022 were analyzed, including comparisons of state and regional population-based exposure rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 4,925 exposures involving ∆8-THC as the primary substance reported to US PCs from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022, with 69.8% of these reported in the US South. The rate of exposure per 100,000 US population increased by 79.2% from 0.53 in 2021 to 0.95 in 2022. In 2022, the mean rate of ∆8-THC exposures in states where cannabis use was illegal was 1.64 per 100,000 population (95% CI: 1.08-2.20) compared with 0.52 (95% CI: 0.29-0.76) in states where cannabis use was legal (P = 0.0010). In 2022, the mean rate of ∆8-THC exposures in states where ∆8-THC was unregulated was 1.36 per 100,000 population (95% CI: 0.95-1.77) compared with 0.17 (95% CI: 0.06-0.27) in states where ∆8-THC was banned (P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rate of ∆8-THC exposures reported to US PCs increased by 79% from 2021 to 2022, with the US South accounting for more than two-thirds of exposures. The rate of ∆8-THC exposures reported to PCs was significantly lower among states where ∆8-THC was banned and among states where cannabis use was legal. Consistent regulation of ∆8-THC across all states should be adopted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"389-400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436591/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142017745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biostatistics and Epidemiology for the Toxicologist: Likelihood Ratios. 毒理学家的生物统计学和流行病学:似然比。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI: 10.1007/s13181-024-01026-9
Gar Ming Chan, Mark K Su

Likelihood ratios compare two values (i.e., case rates) in order to illustrate the magnitude of the difference between the two. This ratio increases the confidence one can have in a diagnostic test from a different vantage point than that of sensitivity and specificity. The calculations of likelihood ratios are presented along with a simplified approach. Likelihood ratios are another tool the toxicologist should employ in their understanding of statistics and probability.

似然比对两个值(即病例率)进行比较,以说明两者之间的差异程度。与灵敏度和特异性相比,似然比从不同的角度增加了人们对诊断测试的信心。本文介绍了似然比的计算方法和简化方法。似然比是毒理学家了解统计学和概率论的另一个工具。
{"title":"Biostatistics and Epidemiology for the Toxicologist: Likelihood Ratios.","authors":"Gar Ming Chan, Mark K Su","doi":"10.1007/s13181-024-01026-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13181-024-01026-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Likelihood ratios compare two values (i.e., case rates) in order to illustrate the magnitude of the difference between the two. This ratio increases the confidence one can have in a diagnostic test from a different vantage point than that of sensitivity and specificity. The calculations of likelihood ratios are presented along with a simplified approach. Likelihood ratios are another tool the toxicologist should employ in their understanding of statistics and probability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"411-415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436569/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142046824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
20 Years of JMT: The Vital Role of Journals to Explain Things to Others and Ourselves. JMT 20 年:期刊在向他人和自己解释事物方面的重要作用。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1007/s13181-024-01036-7
Mark B Mycyk
{"title":"20 Years of JMT: The Vital Role of Journals to Explain Things to Others and Ourselves.","authors":"Mark B Mycyk","doi":"10.1007/s13181-024-01036-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13181-024-01036-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"341-343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436524/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on "Safety of Physostigmine for Pediatric Antimuscarinic Poisoning". 就 "物理斯的明治疗小儿抗心绞痛药中毒的安全性 "发表评论。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI: 10.1007/s13181-024-01022-z
Kyle D Pires, Lewis R Goldfrank
{"title":"Comment on \"Safety of Physostigmine for Pediatric Antimuscarinic Poisoning\".","authors":"Kyle D Pires, Lewis R Goldfrank","doi":"10.1007/s13181-024-01022-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13181-024-01022-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"438-439"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436600/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141855837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Medical Toxicology vs. Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine - Are We Really Full of Case Reports? 医学毒理学与急诊医学和内科学--我们真的满脑子都是病例报告吗?
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-20 DOI: 10.1007/s13181-024-01031-y
Jason B Hack, Kevin F O'Brien

Introduction: Case reports are perceived as having diminished value relative to other study designs. It has been said that medical toxicology (MT) is based largely upon case report literature and thought to be unique in this regard. We sought to quantify recent MT publication of case reports compared with top periodicals from emergency medicine (EM) and internal medicine (IM) journals.

Methods: A retrospective review examined 5 years of articles in 6 U.S.-based medical journals-MT (Journal of Medical Toxicology, Clinical Toxicology), EM (Annals of Emergency Medicine, Journal of Emergency Medicine), and IM (JAMA Internal Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine) was performed using on-line resources. Every article in each issue was categorized into Case report vs. Research and Analysis articles vs. Excluded. "Case report" was defined as one (or ≤ 5) individual patients, one patient's data, etc. Total articles per issue were reported after removing Excluded items.

Results: Between 2018 and 2022, these 6 periodicals published 522 issues; with 2644 case reports; and 8246 total included articles. Comparison of MT case reports vs. EM revealed a significant difference and odds (Odds Ratio = 1.7, (95% CI: [1.49, 2.03], p < 0.001); MT compared with IM was not significantly different (Odds Ratio = 1.1, (95% CI: [0.96, 1.30], p = 0.150). The percent of case reports increased in the IM and EM journals compared with a relative decrease in the MT journals. Cumulative case report precents were consistently greater in EM and IM than in MT.

Conclusion: In the past 5 years, MT journals published fewer and had a declining trend of case reports compared with leading EM and IM journals. Future research is needed to determine the effect on MT practice resulting from the diminished body of case report literature.

导言:与其他研究设计相比,病例报告的价值被认为有所降低。有人说,医学毒理学(MT)在很大程度上是以病例报告文献为基础的,并认为它在这方面是独一无二的。我们试图将近期发表的MT病例报告与急诊医学(EM)和内科医学(IM)期刊的顶级期刊进行量化比较:我们利用在线资源对 6 种美国医学期刊--《医学毒理学杂志》(Journal of Medical Toxicology)、《临床毒理学》(Clinical Toxicology)、《急诊医学年鉴》(Annals of Emergency Medicine)、《急诊医学杂志》(Journal of Emergency Medicine)和《内科学杂志》(JAMA Internal Medicine)、《新英格兰医学杂志》(New England Journal of Medicine)--5 年来的文章进行了回顾性研究。每期的每篇文章都被分为病例报告与研究和分析文章与排除文章。"病例报告 "是指一名(或少于 5 名)患者、一名患者的数据等。剔除排除项后报告每期文章总数:2018年至2022年期间,这6种期刊共出版522期;病例报告2644篇;收录文章总数8246篇。比较MT病例报告与EM病例报告发现,MT病例报告与EM病例报告存在显著差异和几率(Odds Ratio = 1.7,(95% CI:[1.49,2.03],P Conclusion:与主要的 EM 和 IM 期刊相比,MT 期刊在过去 5 年中发表的病例报告较少,且呈下降趋势。未来的研究需要确定病例报告文献的减少对 MT 实践的影响。
{"title":"Medical Toxicology vs. Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine - Are We Really Full of Case Reports?","authors":"Jason B Hack, Kevin F O'Brien","doi":"10.1007/s13181-024-01031-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13181-024-01031-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Case reports are perceived as having diminished value relative to other study designs. It has been said that medical toxicology (MT) is based largely upon case report literature and thought to be unique in this regard. We sought to quantify recent MT publication of case reports compared with top periodicals from emergency medicine (EM) and internal medicine (IM) journals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review examined 5 years of articles in 6 U.S.-based medical journals-MT (Journal of Medical Toxicology, Clinical Toxicology), EM (Annals of Emergency Medicine, Journal of Emergency Medicine), and IM (JAMA Internal Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine) was performed using on-line resources. Every article in each issue was categorized into Case report vs. Research and Analysis articles vs. Excluded. \"Case report\" was defined as one (or ≤ 5) individual patients, one patient's data, etc. Total articles per issue were reported after removing Excluded items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2018 and 2022, these 6 periodicals published 522 issues; with 2644 case reports; and 8246 total included articles. Comparison of MT case reports vs. EM revealed a significant difference and odds (Odds Ratio = 1.7, (95% CI: [1.49, 2.03], p < 0.001); MT compared with IM was not significantly different (Odds Ratio = 1.1, (95% CI: [0.96, 1.30], p = 0.150). The percent of case reports increased in the IM and EM journals compared with a relative decrease in the MT journals. Cumulative case report precents were consistently greater in EM and IM than in MT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the past 5 years, MT journals published fewer and had a declining trend of case reports compared with leading EM and IM journals. Future research is needed to determine the effect on MT practice resulting from the diminished body of case report literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"401-406"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436617/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analytically Confirmed Intentional Overdose of the Antidepressant Vortioxetine. 经分析确认的抗抑郁药物伏替西汀故意过量。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1007/s13181-024-01027-8
Adam Daneshmend, Allon Gould, Simon Hudson, John Robert Howard Archer, Paul Ivor Dargan, David Michael Wood

Introduction: Vortioxetine is an antidepressant with a multimodal mechanism of action. It is used as a treatment option for patients with major depressive episodes. There have only been two previously reported non-fatal overdoses of vortioxetine; neither of these were analytically confirmed There has also been one case of serotonin syndrome potentially related to vortioxetine and two deaths where vortioxetine was detected. We report here a non-fatal analytically confirmed case of vortioxetine overdose.

Case report: A 32-year-old male presented to the emergency department (ED) 12-13 h after oral ingestion of 1,260 mg of vortioxetine and 350 mg of diazepam. A family member reported that he had been drowsy after the overdose, but his level of consciousness and observations (heart rate, blood pressure and temperature) were normal on review by the pre-hospital emergency services and on arrival to the ED. During a period of observation, he did not develop any features of serotonin syndrome or any other significant toxicity. Toxicological analysis of a blood sample taken in the ED detected vortioxetine (plasma concentration 457 ng/mL 10 h after ingestion) and sub-therapeutic concentrations of diazepam and pregabalin.

Discussion: Despite having a plasma vortioxetine concentration nearly 15-times therapeutic vortioxetine concentrations, this patient did not develop any significant toxicity. In particular he did not develop any clinical or biochemical features of serotonin toxicity that would be expected with this class of antidepressant. Additional reporting of analytically confirmed vortioxetine overdoses will allow clinicians and licensing authorities to further understand the safety of this medication in overdose.

简介伏替西汀是一种具有多模式作用机制的抗抑郁药。它可用于治疗重度抑郁发作患者。此前仅有两例因过量服用伏替西汀而非致命的报道,但均未得到分析证实。还有一例血清素综合征病例可能与伏替西汀有关,另有两例死亡病例检测出了伏替西汀。我们在此报告一例经分析证实的非致命性伏替西汀过量病例:一名 32 岁的男性在口服 1,260 毫克伏替西汀和 350 毫克地西泮 12-13 小时后到急诊科就诊。一名家属称他在服用过量药物后一直昏昏欲睡,但院前急救服务人员对他的意识水平和观察结果(心率、血压和体温)进行复查后发现他的意识水平和观察结果(心率、血压和体温)均属正常。在观察期间,他没有出现任何血清素综合征的特征或任何其他明显的中毒症状。对急诊室采集的血液样本进行的毒理学分析检测出了伏替西汀(摄入 10 小时后血浆浓度为 457 纳克/毫升)以及治疗浓度以下的地西泮和普瑞巴林:尽管伏替西汀的血浆浓度接近治疗浓度的 15 倍,但该患者并未出现任何明显的毒性反应。特别是,他没有出现该类抗抑郁药应有的血清素毒性临床或生化特征。对经分析确认的伏替西汀过量用药情况进行更多报告,将有助于临床医生和发证机构进一步了解这种药物在过量用药时的安全性。
{"title":"Analytically Confirmed Intentional Overdose of the Antidepressant Vortioxetine.","authors":"Adam Daneshmend, Allon Gould, Simon Hudson, John Robert Howard Archer, Paul Ivor Dargan, David Michael Wood","doi":"10.1007/s13181-024-01027-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13181-024-01027-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vortioxetine is an antidepressant with a multimodal mechanism of action. It is used as a treatment option for patients with major depressive episodes. There have only been two previously reported non-fatal overdoses of vortioxetine; neither of these were analytically confirmed There has also been one case of serotonin syndrome potentially related to vortioxetine and two deaths where vortioxetine was detected. We report here a non-fatal analytically confirmed case of vortioxetine overdose.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 32-year-old male presented to the emergency department (ED) 12-13 h after oral ingestion of 1,260 mg of vortioxetine and 350 mg of diazepam. A family member reported that he had been drowsy after the overdose, but his level of consciousness and observations (heart rate, blood pressure and temperature) were normal on review by the pre-hospital emergency services and on arrival to the ED. During a period of observation, he did not develop any features of serotonin syndrome or any other significant toxicity. Toxicological analysis of a blood sample taken in the ED detected vortioxetine (plasma concentration 457 ng/mL 10 h after ingestion) and sub-therapeutic concentrations of diazepam and pregabalin.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite having a plasma vortioxetine concentration nearly 15-times therapeutic vortioxetine concentrations, this patient did not develop any significant toxicity. In particular he did not develop any clinical or biochemical features of serotonin toxicity that would be expected with this class of antidepressant. Additional reporting of analytically confirmed vortioxetine overdoses will allow clinicians and licensing authorities to further understand the safety of this medication in overdose.</p>","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"422-426"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436597/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141897644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The American College of Medical Toxicology Annual Scientific Meeting: A Look Back and the Path Forward. 美国医学毒理学学院科学年会:回顾过去,展望未来。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1007/s13181-024-01035-8
Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi, Paul Wax, Adrienne Dunavin, Mark B Mycyk, Lewis S Nelson

More than 20 years that have elapsed since the inaugural American College of Medical Toxicology Spring Conference in 2002. During this time, the now ACMT Annual Scientific Meeting has grown in many ways, as demonstrated by the increase in attendance and abstract submissions, and diversification of educational offerings, and partners. Most importantly, the scientific rigor and presentation of new knowledge has continued to mature, and the conference is now firmly rooted in the annual educational schedule for medical toxicologists. In anticipation of the upcoming 2025 ASM, we reflect upon the evolution and growth of ACMT's research and educational agendas, and the Annual Scientific Meeting itself.

自 2002 年首次举办美国医学毒理学学院春季会议以来,20 多年过去了。在此期间,现在的美国医学毒理学会科学年会在许多方面都得到了发展,这体现在参会人数和摘要提交量的增加,以及教育课程和合作伙伴的多样化。最重要的是,科学的严谨性和对新知识的介绍不断成熟,该会议现已牢牢扎根于医学毒理学家的年度教育计划中。为了迎接即将到来的 2025 年科学年会,我们对 ACMT 的研究和教育议程以及科学年会本身的演变和发展进行了反思。
{"title":"The American College of Medical Toxicology Annual Scientific Meeting: A Look Back and the Path Forward.","authors":"Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi, Paul Wax, Adrienne Dunavin, Mark B Mycyk, Lewis S Nelson","doi":"10.1007/s13181-024-01035-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13181-024-01035-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>More than 20 years that have elapsed since the inaugural American College of Medical Toxicology Spring Conference in 2002. During this time, the now ACMT Annual Scientific Meeting has grown in many ways, as demonstrated by the increase in attendance and abstract submissions, and diversification of educational offerings, and partners. Most importantly, the scientific rigor and presentation of new knowledge has continued to mature, and the conference is now firmly rooted in the annual educational schedule for medical toxicologists. In anticipation of the upcoming 2025 ASM, we reflect upon the evolution and growth of ACMT's research and educational agendas, and the Annual Scientific Meeting itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"407-410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436584/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Medical Toxicology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1