Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2023-05-15DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06028-9
Artem Stanishevskiy, Konstantin Babichev, Dmitriy Svistov, Alexander Savello
Introduction: In absence of hereditary diseases multiple brain arteriovenous malformations are extremely rare. The case series that would include more than 13 patients are unlikely to be found, which causes an obstacle to comprehensively analyzing the peculiarities of epidemiology, symptoms and treatment options for this disorder. We describe patent with two independent arteriovenous malformations in frontal and parietal lobes that have been treated with combination of preoperative embolization, surgical excision and stereotactic radiosurgery. Systematic review of literature was also performed, focusing on epidemiology of sporadic multiple arteriovenous malformations, niduses location, clinical presentation, treatment and outcomes.
Evidence acquisition: We systematically analyzed relevant literature using the PubMed database, encompassing studies in English (published between 1956 and 2023) reporting incidence, epidemiological features, symptomatology and treatment of sporadic multiple brain arteriovenous malformations.
Evidence synthesis: Forty-eight studies with a total of 80 sporadic multiple cerebral arteriovenous malformations were extracted from the literature. Twenty-two papers reported incidence of multiple brain arteriovenous malformations. The average incidence (including our data) was 2.4%, varying significantly between children and adults. Hemorrhage from one AVM was the most frequent debut of multiple cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Surgical removal of niduses remains a valuable treatment option even considering the enhancement of embolization techniques and the development of radiosurgery.
Conclusions: Sporadic multiple cerebral arteriovenous malformations represent a difficult problem to solve. The possibility of persistence of multiple brain arteriovenous malformations should be taken into account when diagnosing and following-up.
{"title":"Sporadic multiple cerebral arteriovenous malformations: case report and systematic review of additional 80 cases.","authors":"Artem Stanishevskiy, Konstantin Babichev, Dmitriy Svistov, Alexander Savello","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06028-9","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06028-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In absence of hereditary diseases multiple brain arteriovenous malformations are extremely rare. The case series that would include more than 13 patients are unlikely to be found, which causes an obstacle to comprehensively analyzing the peculiarities of epidemiology, symptoms and treatment options for this disorder. We describe patent with two independent arteriovenous malformations in frontal and parietal lobes that have been treated with combination of preoperative embolization, surgical excision and stereotactic radiosurgery. Systematic review of literature was also performed, focusing on epidemiology of sporadic multiple arteriovenous malformations, niduses location, clinical presentation, treatment and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We systematically analyzed relevant literature using the PubMed database, encompassing studies in English (published between 1956 and 2023) reporting incidence, epidemiological features, symptomatology and treatment of sporadic multiple brain arteriovenous malformations.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Forty-eight studies with a total of 80 sporadic multiple cerebral arteriovenous malformations were extracted from the literature. Twenty-two papers reported incidence of multiple brain arteriovenous malformations. The average incidence (including our data) was 2.4%, varying significantly between children and adults. Hemorrhage from one AVM was the most frequent debut of multiple cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Surgical removal of niduses remains a valuable treatment option even considering the enhancement of embolization techniques and the development of radiosurgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sporadic multiple cerebral arteriovenous malformations represent a difficult problem to solve. The possibility of persistence of multiple brain arteriovenous malformations should be taken into account when diagnosing and following-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"225-231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9467725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2023-09-13DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06119-2
Oday Atallah, Bipin Chaurasia
{"title":"The detrimental effects of residents' over-reliance on neuronavigation technology on their knowledge of neuroanatomical structures.","authors":"Oday Atallah, Bipin Chaurasia","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06119-2","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06119-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"247-248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10286249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2023-10-25DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06130-1
Joanna M Roy, Syed F Kazim, Dylan Macciola, Dante N Rangel, Kavelin Rumalla, Zafar Karimov, Remy Link, Javed Iqbal, Muhammad A Riaz, Georgios P Skandalakis, Carmelo V Venero, Rachel B Sidebottom, Alis J Dicpinigaitis, Christian S Kassicieh, Omar Tarawneh, Matt S Conlon, Rachel Thommen, Daniel J Alvarez-Crespo, Karizma Chhabra, Sahaana Sridhar, Amanpreet Gill, John Vellek, Phuong A Nguyen, Grace Thompson, Myranda Robinson, Christian A Bowers
Introduction: Baseline frailty status has been utilized to predict a wide range of outcomes and guide preoperative decision making in neurosurgery. This systematic review aims to analyze existing literature on the utilization of frailty as a predictor of neurosurgical outcomes.
Evidence acquisition: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Studies that utilized baseline frailty status to predict outcomes after a neurosurgical intervention were included in this systematic review. Studies that utilized sarcopenia as the sole measure of frailty were excluded. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library was searched from inception to March 1st, 2023, to identify relevant articles.
Evidence synthesis: Overall, 244 studies met the inclusion criteria. The 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI-11) was the most utilized frailty measure (N.=91, 37.2%) followed by the five-factor modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) (N.=80, 32.7%). Spine surgery was the most common subspecialty (N.=131, 53.7%), followed by intracranial tumor resection (N.=57, 23.3%), and post-operative complications were the most reported outcome (N.=130, 53.2%) in neurosurgical frailty studies. The USA and the Bowers author group published the greatest number of articles within the study period (N.=176, 72.1% and N.=37, 15.2%, respectively).
Conclusions: Frailty literature has grown exponentially over the years and has been incorporated into neurosurgical decision making. Although a wide range of frailty indices exist, their utility may vary according to their ability to be incorporated in the outpatient clinical setting.
{"title":"Frailty as a predictor of postoperative outcomes in neurosurgery: a systematic review.","authors":"Joanna M Roy, Syed F Kazim, Dylan Macciola, Dante N Rangel, Kavelin Rumalla, Zafar Karimov, Remy Link, Javed Iqbal, Muhammad A Riaz, Georgios P Skandalakis, Carmelo V Venero, Rachel B Sidebottom, Alis J Dicpinigaitis, Christian S Kassicieh, Omar Tarawneh, Matt S Conlon, Rachel Thommen, Daniel J Alvarez-Crespo, Karizma Chhabra, Sahaana Sridhar, Amanpreet Gill, John Vellek, Phuong A Nguyen, Grace Thompson, Myranda Robinson, Christian A Bowers","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06130-1","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06130-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Baseline frailty status has been utilized to predict a wide range of outcomes and guide preoperative decision making in neurosurgery. This systematic review aims to analyze existing literature on the utilization of frailty as a predictor of neurosurgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Studies that utilized baseline frailty status to predict outcomes after a neurosurgical intervention were included in this systematic review. Studies that utilized sarcopenia as the sole measure of frailty were excluded. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library was searched from inception to March 1<sup>st</sup>, 2023, to identify relevant articles.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Overall, 244 studies met the inclusion criteria. The 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI-11) was the most utilized frailty measure (N.=91, 37.2%) followed by the five-factor modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) (N.=80, 32.7%). Spine surgery was the most common subspecialty (N.=131, 53.7%), followed by intracranial tumor resection (N.=57, 23.3%), and post-operative complications were the most reported outcome (N.=130, 53.2%) in neurosurgical frailty studies. The USA and the Bowers author group published the greatest number of articles within the study period (N.=176, 72.1% and N.=37, 15.2%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty literature has grown exponentially over the years and has been incorporated into neurosurgical decision making. Although a wide range of frailty indices exist, their utility may vary according to their ability to be incorporated in the outpatient clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"208-215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50158149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2023-09-18DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06132-5
Javed Iqbal, Joanna M Roy, Syed F Kazim, Christian A Bowers
{"title":"Frailty-based prehabilitation for patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery.","authors":"Javed Iqbal, Joanna M Roy, Syed F Kazim, Christian A Bowers","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06132-5","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06132-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"248-249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10291884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-01-23DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06171-4
Pietro Zangrossi, Massimo Martini, Francesco Guerrini, Pasquale DE Bonis, Giannantonio Spena
ChatGPT, a conversational artificial intelligence model based on the generative pre-trained transformer GPT architecture, has garnered widespread attention due to its user-friendly nature and diverse capabilities. This technology enables users of all backgrounds to effortlessly engage in human-like conversations and receive coherent and intelligible responses. Beyond casual interactions, ChatGPT offers compelling prospects for scientific research, facilitating tasks like literature review and content summarization, ultimately expediting and enhancing the academic writing process. Still, in the field of medicine and surgery, it has already shown its endless potential in many tasks (enhancing decision-making processes, aiding in surgical planning and simulation, providing real-time assistance during surgery, improving postoperative care and rehabilitation, contributing to training, education, research, and development). However, it is crucial to acknowledge the model's limitations, encompassing knowledge constraints and the potential for erroneous responses, as well as ethical and legal considerations. This paper explores the potential benefits and pitfalls of these innovative technologies in scientific research, shedding light on their transformative impact while addressing concerns surrounding their use.
{"title":"Large language model, AI and scientific research: why ChatGPT is only the beginning.","authors":"Pietro Zangrossi, Massimo Martini, Francesco Guerrini, Pasquale DE Bonis, Giannantonio Spena","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06171-4","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06171-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ChatGPT, a conversational artificial intelligence model based on the generative pre-trained transformer GPT architecture, has garnered widespread attention due to its user-friendly nature and diverse capabilities. This technology enables users of all backgrounds to effortlessly engage in human-like conversations and receive coherent and intelligible responses. Beyond casual interactions, ChatGPT offers compelling prospects for scientific research, facilitating tasks like literature review and content summarization, ultimately expediting and enhancing the academic writing process. Still, in the field of medicine and surgery, it has already shown its endless potential in many tasks (enhancing decision-making processes, aiding in surgical planning and simulation, providing real-time assistance during surgery, improving postoperative care and rehabilitation, contributing to training, education, research, and development). However, it is crucial to acknowledge the model's limitations, encompassing knowledge constraints and the potential for erroneous responses, as well as ethical and legal considerations. This paper explores the potential benefits and pitfalls of these innovative technologies in scientific research, shedding light on their transformative impact while addressing concerns surrounding their use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"216-224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139521125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-19DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06165-9
Francesco Costa, Francesco Restelli, Elio Mazzapicchi, Emanuele Rubiu, Giulio Bonomo, Marco Schiariti, Niccolò Innocenti, Carla D Anania, Andrea Cardia, Maurizio Fornari
Background: To date, no shared algorithms with the aim of guiding surgical strategy in complex cases of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) exist. Our purpose is to present the Cervical Surgical Score (CSS) which could help in identifying complex DCM cases, suggesting a surgical strategy.
Methods: We created the CSS based on multidisciplinary and literature-focused discussions, based on eight parameters including number of levels of cervical pathology and myelopathy, type and predominance of compression and grade of clinical myelopathy. We prospectively enrolled surgical DCM patients in a 15-months period, collecting clinical and radiological data. During outpatient clinic a specific surgical indication was offered to DCM patients. To validate the score, each outpatient clinic surgical indication was compared a posteriori to the one that resulted from multidisciplinary CSS scoring, focusing on patients for which both an anterior and posterior approach were considered suitable.
Results: A total of 100 patients operated on for DCM at our Institution between December 2021 and February 2023 were prospectively enrolled. In 53% of patients the pathology was present at more than two levels. According to CSS calculation, 14% of patients resulted in the "grey zone", where both an anterior and posterior approach were deemed feasible. Among them, in 42.8% of cases the CSS allowed a modification of the originally planned surgery. Looking at outcome, an improvement of m-JOA score in 62% of patients was disclosed.
Conclusions: This preliminary study showed the reliability and usefulness of CSS in detecting complex DCM cases, requiring further analysis by expert spine surgeons, suggesting a surgical strategy.
{"title":"Proposal of a new score system (Cervical Surgical Score) for management of degenerative cervical myelopathy.","authors":"Francesco Costa, Francesco Restelli, Elio Mazzapicchi, Emanuele Rubiu, Giulio Bonomo, Marco Schiariti, Niccolò Innocenti, Carla D Anania, Andrea Cardia, Maurizio Fornari","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06165-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06165-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To date, no shared algorithms with the aim of guiding surgical strategy in complex cases of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) exist. Our purpose is to present the Cervical Surgical Score (CSS) which could help in identifying complex DCM cases, suggesting a surgical strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created the CSS based on multidisciplinary and literature-focused discussions, based on eight parameters including number of levels of cervical pathology and myelopathy, type and predominance of compression and grade of clinical myelopathy. We prospectively enrolled surgical DCM patients in a 15-months period, collecting clinical and radiological data. During outpatient clinic a specific surgical indication was offered to DCM patients. To validate the score, each outpatient clinic surgical indication was compared a posteriori to the one that resulted from multidisciplinary CSS scoring, focusing on patients for which both an anterior and posterior approach were considered suitable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100 patients operated on for DCM at our Institution between December 2021 and February 2023 were prospectively enrolled. In 53% of patients the pathology was present at more than two levels. According to CSS calculation, 14% of patients resulted in the \"grey zone\", where both an anterior and posterior approach were deemed feasible. Among them, in 42.8% of cases the CSS allowed a modification of the originally planned surgery. Looking at outcome, an improvement of m-JOA score in 62% of patients was disclosed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This preliminary study showed the reliability and usefulness of CSS in detecting complex DCM cases, requiring further analysis by expert spine surgeons, suggesting a surgical strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140175138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-14DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06107-6
Laurèl Rauschenbach, Pauline Bartsch, Alejandro N Santos, Anna Michel, Hanah H Gull, Pikria Ketelauri, Marvin Darkwah Oppong, Börge Schmidt, Celia Dobersalske, Tobias Blau, Yahya Ahmadipour, Ramazan Jabbarli, Karsten H Wrede, Ulrich Sure, Philipp Dammann
Background: The aim of this study was to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) before and after treatment for intracerebral low-grade glioma.
Methods: Patients with low-grade glioma who underwent surgical tumor removal between 2012 and 2018 were eligible for this study. All individuals and their closest relatives received thorough preoperative (
Results: A total of 25 patients were referred for further analysis, after adjustment to the 2021 WHO classification for central nervous system tumors. Compared to the values of a healthy reference population, the patients expressed significant limitations in several SF36 items, both before and after treatment. Under treatment, there were no significant changes in the SF36 items, but the ALQI questionnaire indicated decreasing HRQOL over time. Data derived from relatives revealed a high degree of concordance with the rating results of the patients. Univariate analysis identified neurological deterioration and ongoing epileptic seizures as predictors for unfavorable HRQOL after one year.
Conclusions: Low-grade glioma disease has a significant impact on HRQOL and treatment might contribute to further deterioration. New-onset neurological deficits and ongoing epileptic seizures are predictors of limitations in quality of life. Since the results are based on a small cohort with limited follow-up time, the generalizability of these statements is limited and further studies are required.
{"title":"Longitudinal impact of intracerebral low-grade glioma disease on health-related quality of life.","authors":"Laurèl Rauschenbach, Pauline Bartsch, Alejandro N Santos, Anna Michel, Hanah H Gull, Pikria Ketelauri, Marvin Darkwah Oppong, Börge Schmidt, Celia Dobersalske, Tobias Blau, Yahya Ahmadipour, Ramazan Jabbarli, Karsten H Wrede, Ulrich Sure, Philipp Dammann","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06107-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06107-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) before and after treatment for intracerebral low-grade glioma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with low-grade glioma who underwent surgical tumor removal between 2012 and 2018 were eligible for this study. All individuals and their closest relatives received thorough preoperative (<seven days before surgery) and posttreatment (12 months after surgery) neuropsychological testing investigating quality of life. The assessment consisted of the Aachen Life Quality Inventory (ALQI) and the Short Form 36 (SF36) questionnaire. Calculated SF36 values were compared with reference values from population-based studies. A set of clinical features were investigated for their association with longitudinal HRQOL deterioration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 patients were referred for further analysis, after adjustment to the 2021 WHO classification for central nervous system tumors. Compared to the values of a healthy reference population, the patients expressed significant limitations in several SF36 items, both before and after treatment. Under treatment, there were no significant changes in the SF36 items, but the ALQI questionnaire indicated decreasing HRQOL over time. Data derived from relatives revealed a high degree of concordance with the rating results of the patients. Univariate analysis identified neurological deterioration and ongoing epileptic seizures as predictors for unfavorable HRQOL after one year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-grade glioma disease has a significant impact on HRQOL and treatment might contribute to further deterioration. New-onset neurological deficits and ongoing epileptic seizures are predictors of limitations in quality of life. Since the results are based on a small cohort with limited follow-up time, the generalizability of these statements is limited and further studies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140119830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-07DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.24.06179-4
Derek B Asserson, Danielle A Alaouieh, Joanna M Roy, Meic H Schmidt, Christian A Bowers
Background: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a well-established surgical approach in the treatment of degenerative pathology, trauma, infection, and neoplasia of the spine. This study sought to assess the usefulness of frailty as a predictor of non-home discharge (NHD) for patients who undergo the procedure.
Methods: Patient cases were extracted from the American College of Surgeons's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2020. Univariable and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to compare the 5-item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) to the Revised Risk Analysis Index (RAI-rev) in relation to NHD.
Results: Simple linear regression demonstrated that increasing frailty was associated with an increased likelihood of NHD among 25,317 patients (mFI-5 odds ratio: 2.13, 3.23, 8.4; RAI-rev odds ratio: 3.22, 9.6, 23.6 [P<0.001 for all]). In each instance, a Cochran-Armitage trend test was significant (P<0.001), indicating a linear association of increasing odds. The RAI-rev resulted in a C-statistic of 0.722, compared to 0.628 for the mFI-5, and was shown to have superior discriminative ability with a DeLong Test (P<0.001).
Conclusions: Frailty, as measured by mFI-5 and RAI-rev, was associated with an increased likelihood of NHD in patients who underwent ALIF. This finding supports recent literature on the promising utility of these indices, especially the RAI-rev, in preoperative decision-making across multiple facets of neurosurgery.
{"title":"Frailty predicts non-home discharge in anterior lumbar interbody fusion patients.","authors":"Derek B Asserson, Danielle A Alaouieh, Joanna M Roy, Meic H Schmidt, Christian A Bowers","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.24.06179-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.24.06179-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a well-established surgical approach in the treatment of degenerative pathology, trauma, infection, and neoplasia of the spine. This study sought to assess the usefulness of frailty as a predictor of non-home discharge (NHD) for patients who undergo the procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient cases were extracted from the American College of Surgeons's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2020. Univariable and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to compare the 5-item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) to the Revised Risk Analysis Index (RAI-rev) in relation to NHD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simple linear regression demonstrated that increasing frailty was associated with an increased likelihood of NHD among 25,317 patients (mFI-5 odds ratio: 2.13, 3.23, 8.4; RAI-rev odds ratio: 3.22, 9.6, 23.6 [P<0.001 for all]). In each instance, a Cochran-Armitage trend test was significant (P<0.001), indicating a linear association of increasing odds. The RAI-rev resulted in a C-statistic of 0.722, compared to 0.628 for the mFI-5, and was shown to have superior discriminative ability with a DeLong Test (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty, as measured by mFI-5 and RAI-rev, was associated with an increased likelihood of NHD in patients who underwent ALIF. This finding supports recent literature on the promising utility of these indices, especially the RAI-rev, in preoperative decision-making across multiple facets of neurosurgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140049690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2023-02-13DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.22.05895-7
Meredith A Monsour, Daniel I Wolfson, Jacob Jo, Douglas P Terry, Scott L Zuckerman
Introduction: We sought to evaluate a potential association between contact vs. non-contact sport participation and long-term neurologic outcomes and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE).
Evidence acquisition: PubMed/Embase/PsycINFO/CINAHL databases were queried for studies between 1950-2020 with contact and non-contact sports, longitudinal assessment >10 years, and long-term neurologic outcomes in four-domains: I) clinical diagnosis; II) CTE neuropathology; III) neurocognition; and IV) neuroimaging.
Evidence synthesis: Of 2561 studies, 37 met inclusion criteria, and 19 contained homogenous outcomes usable in the meta-analysis. Domain I: Across six studies, no significant relationship was seen between contact sport participation and antemortem diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease or death related to such a diagnosis (RR1.88, P=0.054, 95%CI0.99, 3.49); however, marginal significance (P<0.10) was obtained. Domain II: Across three autopsy studies, no significant relationship was seen between contact sport participation and CTE neuropathology (RR42.39, P=0.086, 95%CI0.59, 3057.46); however, marginal significance (P<0.10) was obtained. Domain III: Across five cognitive studies, no significant relationship was seen between contact sport participation and cognitive function on the Trail Making Test (TMT) scores A/B (A:d=0.17, P=0.275,95% CI-0.13, 0.47; B:d=0.13, P=0.310, 95%CI-0.12, 0.38). Domain IV: In 10 brain imaging-based studies, 32% comparisons showed significant differences between those with a history of contact sport vs. those without.
Conclusions: No statistically significant increased risk of neurodegenerative diagnosis, CTE neuropathology, or neurocognitive changes was found to be associated with contact sport participation, yet marginal significance was obtained in two domains. A minority of imaging comparisons showed differences of uncertain clinical significance. These results highlight the need for longitudinal investigations using standardized contact sport participation and neurodegenerative criteria.
{"title":"Is contact sport participation associated with chronic traumatic encephalopathy or neurodegenerative decline? A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Meredith A Monsour, Daniel I Wolfson, Jacob Jo, Douglas P Terry, Scott L Zuckerman","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.22.05895-7","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S0390-5616.22.05895-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We sought to evaluate a potential association between contact vs. non-contact sport participation and long-term neurologic outcomes and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>PubMed/Embase/PsycINFO/CINAHL databases were queried for studies between 1950-2020 with contact and non-contact sports, longitudinal assessment >10 years, and long-term neurologic outcomes in four-domains: I) clinical diagnosis; II) CTE neuropathology; III) neurocognition; and IV) neuroimaging.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Of 2561 studies, 37 met inclusion criteria, and 19 contained homogenous outcomes usable in the meta-analysis. Domain I: Across six studies, no significant relationship was seen between contact sport participation and antemortem diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease or death related to such a diagnosis (RR1.88, P=0.054, 95%CI0.99, 3.49); however, marginal significance (P<0.10) was obtained. Domain II: Across three autopsy studies, no significant relationship was seen between contact sport participation and CTE neuropathology (RR42.39, P=0.086, 95%CI0.59, 3057.46); however, marginal significance (P<0.10) was obtained. Domain III: Across five cognitive studies, no significant relationship was seen between contact sport participation and cognitive function on the Trail Making Test (TMT) scores A/B (A:d=0.17, P=0.275,95% CI-0.13, 0.47; B:d=0.13, P=0.310, 95%CI-0.12, 0.38). Domain IV: In 10 brain imaging-based studies, 32% comparisons showed significant differences between those with a history of contact sport vs. those without.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No statistically significant increased risk of neurodegenerative diagnosis, CTE neuropathology, or neurocognitive changes was found to be associated with contact sport participation, yet marginal significance was obtained in two domains. A minority of imaging comparisons showed differences of uncertain clinical significance. These results highlight the need for longitudinal investigations using standardized contact sport participation and neurodegenerative criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"117-127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10701059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2023-01-27DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05443-6
Jan Stulik, Zdenek Klezl, Michal Varga, Tomas Vyskocil
Background: Tumorous involvement of the second cervical vertebra is an infrequent, but severe disease. Primary tumors and solitary metastases can be addressed by a radical procedure, a complete removal of the whole compartment. The second cervical vertebra has a highly complex anatomy, and its operation requires considerable surgical skills. The aim of this retrospective study is to present technical aspects of complete resection of C2 for tumor indications, clinical and radiological evaluation of our group of patients and comparison of results of recent reports on surgery in this region in the literature.
Methods: Between 2006 and 2019 we performed 10 total resections of C2 for primary bone tumor or solitary metastasis at our department. Operation was indicated for chordoma in 4 cases and for other diagnoses (plasmacytoma, EWSA, metastases of papillary thyroid carcinoma, medullary thyroid carcinoma, lung carcinoma and sinonasal carcinoma) in one case each. The operative procedure was in all cases performed in two steps. It always started with the posterior approach. The anterior procedure was scheduled according to the patient's condition after an average interval of 16.9 days (range 7-21).
Results: A stable upper cervical spine was achieved in all patients. A solid bone fusion over the whole instrumentation was present in all living patients and they returned to their preoperative activity level. By the final follow-up 6 patients died: one patient died on the 5th postop day because of diffuse uncontrollable bleeding from surgical wound, three patients died of generalization of the underlying disease and two patients due to complications associated with local recurrence of the disease. In addition to regular follow-ups, the surviving patients (N.=4) were also examined upon completion of the study, i.e., on average 91 months (range 17-179 months) postoperatively. With exclusion of an early deceased patient, the average follow-up period of deceased patients was 34.6 months (range 9-55) (N.=5). The average follow-up of the whole group of patients was 59,7 months (N.=9).
Conclusions: Total spondylectomy of C2 is an exceptional surgical procedure associated with risk of serious complications but offers chance for a complete recovery of the patient. Defining indications accurately, especially in solitary metastases, is very difficult even with current level of imaging and other testing. The quality of life of long-term surviving patients in our study was not significantly impacted.
{"title":"Technical aspects of total spondylectomy of C2.","authors":"Jan Stulik, Zdenek Klezl, Michal Varga, Tomas Vyskocil","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05443-6","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05443-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tumorous involvement of the second cervical vertebra is an infrequent, but severe disease. Primary tumors and solitary metastases can be addressed by a radical procedure, a complete removal of the whole compartment. The second cervical vertebra has a highly complex anatomy, and its operation requires considerable surgical skills. The aim of this retrospective study is to present technical aspects of complete resection of C2 for tumor indications, clinical and radiological evaluation of our group of patients and comparison of results of recent reports on surgery in this region in the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2006 and 2019 we performed 10 total resections of C2 for primary bone tumor or solitary metastasis at our department. Operation was indicated for chordoma in 4 cases and for other diagnoses (plasmacytoma, EWSA, metastases of papillary thyroid carcinoma, medullary thyroid carcinoma, lung carcinoma and sinonasal carcinoma) in one case each. The operative procedure was in all cases performed in two steps. It always started with the posterior approach. The anterior procedure was scheduled according to the patient's condition after an average interval of 16.9 days (range 7-21).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A stable upper cervical spine was achieved in all patients. A solid bone fusion over the whole instrumentation was present in all living patients and they returned to their preoperative activity level. By the final follow-up 6 patients died: one patient died on the 5<sup>th</sup> postop day because of diffuse uncontrollable bleeding from surgical wound, three patients died of generalization of the underlying disease and two patients due to complications associated with local recurrence of the disease. In addition to regular follow-ups, the surviving patients (N.=4) were also examined upon completion of the study, i.e., on average 91 months (range 17-179 months) postoperatively. With exclusion of an early deceased patient, the average follow-up period of deceased patients was 34.6 months (range 9-55) (N.=5). The average follow-up of the whole group of patients was 59,7 months (N.=9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Total spondylectomy of C2 is an exceptional surgical procedure associated with risk of serious complications but offers chance for a complete recovery of the patient. Defining indications accurately, especially in solitary metastases, is very difficult even with current level of imaging and other testing. The quality of life of long-term surviving patients in our study was not significantly impacted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"13-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10678123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}