Anna Lebret, Sabina Frese, Simon Lévy, Armin Curt, Virginie Callot, Patrick Freund, Maryam Seif
Spinal cord injury (SCI) results in intramedullary microvasculature disruption and blood perfusion deficit at and remote from the injury site. However, the relationship between remote vascular impairment and functional recovery remains understudied. We characterized perfusion impairment in vivo, rostral to the injury, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and investigated its association with lesion extent and impairment following SCI. Twenty-one patients with chronic cervical SCI and 39 healthy controls (HC) underwent a high-resolution MRI protocol, including intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and T2*-weighted MRI covering C1-C3 cervical levels, as well as T2-weighted MRI to determine lesion volumes. IVIM matrices (i.e., blood volume fraction, velocity, flow indices, and diffusion) and cord structural characteristics were calculated to assess perfusion changes and cervical cord atrophy, respectively. Patients with SCI additionally underwent a standard clinical examination protocol to assess functional impairment. Correlation analysis was used to investigate associations between IVIM parameters with lesion volume and sensorimotor dysfunction. Cervical cord white and gray matter were atrophied (27.60% and 21.10%, p < 0.0001, respectively) above the cervical cord injury, accompanied by a lower blood volume fraction (-22.05%, p < 0.001) and a higher blood velocity-related index (+38.72%, p < 0.0001) in patients with SCI compared with HC. Crucially, gray matter remote perfusion deficit correlated with larger lesion volumes and clinical impairment. This study shows clinically eloquent perfusion deficit rostral to a SCI, its magnitude driven by injury severity. These findings indicate trauma-induced widespread microvascular alterations beyond the injury site. Perfusion MRI matrices in the spinal cord hold promise as biomarkers for monitoring treatment effects and dynamic changes in microvasculature integrity following SCI.
{"title":"Spinal Cord Blood Perfusion Deficit is Associated with Clinical Impairment after Spinal Cord Injury.","authors":"Anna Lebret, Sabina Frese, Simon Lévy, Armin Curt, Virginie Callot, Patrick Freund, Maryam Seif","doi":"10.1089/neu.2024.0267","DOIUrl":"10.1089/neu.2024.0267","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spinal cord injury (SCI) results in intramedullary microvasculature disruption and blood perfusion deficit at and remote from the injury site. However, the relationship between remote vascular impairment and functional recovery remains understudied. We characterized perfusion impairment <i>in vivo</i>, rostral to the injury, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and investigated its association with lesion extent and impairment following SCI. Twenty-one patients with chronic cervical SCI and 39 healthy controls (HC) underwent a high-resolution MRI protocol, including intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and T2*-weighted MRI covering C1-C3 cervical levels, as well as T2-weighted MRI to determine lesion volumes. IVIM matrices (i.e., blood volume fraction, velocity, flow indices, and diffusion) and cord structural characteristics were calculated to assess perfusion changes and cervical cord atrophy, respectively. Patients with SCI additionally underwent a standard clinical examination protocol to assess functional impairment. Correlation analysis was used to investigate associations between IVIM parameters with lesion volume and sensorimotor dysfunction. Cervical cord white and gray matter were atrophied (27.60% and 21.10%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, respectively) above the cervical cord injury, accompanied by a lower blood volume fraction (-22.05%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a higher blood velocity-related index (+38.72%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) in patients with SCI compared with HC. Crucially, gray matter remote perfusion deficit correlated with larger lesion volumes and clinical impairment. This study shows clinically eloquent perfusion deficit rostral to a SCI, its magnitude driven by injury severity. These findings indicate trauma-induced widespread microvascular alterations beyond the injury site. Perfusion MRI matrices in the spinal cord hold promise as biomarkers for monitoring treatment effects and dynamic changes in microvasculature integrity following SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shawn R Eagle, Sarah E Svirsky, Ava M Puccio, Allison Borrasso, Kathryn Edelman, Sue Beers, Denes Agoston, Ryan Soose, Michael Collins, Anthony Kontos, Walter Schneider, David O Okonkwo
The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of predictive blood biomarkers for responsiveness to targeted treatments for chronic psychological issues years after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Targeted Evaluation Action and Monitoring of TBI was a prospective 6-month interventional trial of participants with chronic TBI sequelae (n = 95). Plasma biomarkers were analyzed pre-intervention: glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), tau, hyperphosphorylated tau Thr231 (p-Tau), von Willebrand factor (vWF), brain lipid-binding protein (BLBP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), vascular endothelial growth factor-a (VEGFa), and claudin-5 (CLDN5). Clinical outcomes included the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18). Regression models were built for change in PCL5/BSI-18. Biomarkers and covariates were included. Two models were built to identify responders (improved beyond the minimum clinically important difference). The model to predict change in PCL5 (R2=0.64; p < 0.001) included vWF (p = 0.032), BLBP (p = 0.001), tau (p = 0.002), VEGFa (p = 0.015), female sex (p = 0.06), and military status (p = 0.014). The model to predict change in BSI-18 (R2=0.42; p = 0.003) included vWF (p = 0.042), VEGFa (p = 0.09), BLBP (p = 0.01), CLDN5 (p < 0.001), female sex (p = 0.012), and military status (p = 0.004) as predictors. The model to differentiate participants who improved for PCL5 (R2=0.68; p < 0.001; AUC = 0.93) included vWF (p = 0.02), VEGFa (p = 0.008), and BLBP (p = 0.006). The model to differentiate participants who improved for BSI-18 (R2=0.25; p = 0.04; AUC = 0.75) included UCH-L1 (p = 0.03), GFAP (p = 0.06), and vWF (p = 0.03). Combinations of pre-intervention blood biomarkers were able to differentiate responders from nonresponders in both post-traumatic stress and overall psychological health domains.
{"title":"Predictive Blood Biomarkers of Targeted Intervention for Chronic Mental Health Symptoms following Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Shawn R Eagle, Sarah E Svirsky, Ava M Puccio, Allison Borrasso, Kathryn Edelman, Sue Beers, Denes Agoston, Ryan Soose, Michael Collins, Anthony Kontos, Walter Schneider, David O Okonkwo","doi":"10.1089/neu.2024.0245","DOIUrl":"10.1089/neu.2024.0245","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of predictive blood biomarkers for responsiveness to targeted treatments for chronic psychological issues years after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Targeted Evaluation Action and Monitoring of TBI was a prospective 6-month interventional trial of participants with chronic TBI sequelae (<i>n</i> = 95). Plasma biomarkers were analyzed pre-intervention: glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), tau, hyperphosphorylated tau Thr231 (p-Tau), von Willebrand factor (vWF), brain lipid-binding protein (BLBP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), vascular endothelial growth factor-a (VEGFa), and claudin-5 (CLDN5). Clinical outcomes included the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18). Regression models were built for change in PCL5/BSI-18. Biomarkers and covariates were included. Two models were built to identify responders (improved beyond the minimum clinically important difference). The model to predict change in PCL5 (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>=0.64; <i>p</i> < 0.001) included vWF (<i>p</i> = 0.032), BLBP (<i>p</i> = 0.001), tau (<i>p</i> = 0.002), VEGFa (<i>p</i> = 0.015), female sex (<i>p</i> = 0.06), and military status (<i>p</i> = 0.014). The model to predict change in BSI-18 (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>=0.42; <i>p</i> = 0.003) included vWF (<i>p</i> = 0.042), VEGFa (<i>p</i> = 0.09), BLBP (<i>p</i> = 0.01), CLDN5 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), female sex (<i>p</i> = 0.012), and military status (<i>p</i> = 0.004) as predictors. The model to differentiate participants who improved for PCL5 (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>=0.68; <i>p</i> < 0.001; AUC = 0.93) included vWF (<i>p</i> = 0.02), VEGFa (<i>p</i> = 0.008), and BLBP (<i>p</i> = 0.006). The model to differentiate participants who improved for BSI-18 (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>=0.25; <i>p</i> = 0.04; AUC = 0.75) included UCH-L1 (<i>p</i> = 0.03), GFAP (<i>p</i> = 0.06), and vWF (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Combinations of pre-intervention blood biomarkers were able to differentiate responders from nonresponders in both post-traumatic stress and overall psychological health domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the cornerstone to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention. To assess the methodology of clinical research, we performed a systematic review that evaluated the different outcomes used in RCTs targeting the early phase of moderate-to-severe adult TBI from 1983 to October 31, 2023. We extracted each outcome and organized them according to the COMET and OMERACT framework (core area, broad domains, target domains, and finally outcomes). A total of 190 RCTs were included, including 52,010 participants. A total of 557 outcomes were reported and classified between the following core areas: pathophysiological manifestations [169 RCTs (88.9%)], life impact [117 RCTs (61.6%)], death [94 RCTs (49.5%)], resource use [72 RCTs (37.9%)], and adverse events [41 RCTs (21.6%)]. We identified 29 broad domains and 89 target domains. Among target domains, physical functioning [111 (58.4%)], mortality [94 (49.5%)], intracranial pressure target domain [68 (35.8%)], and hemodynamics [53 (27.9%)] were the most frequent. Outcomes were mostly clinician-reported [177 (93.2%)], while patient-reported outcomes were rarely reported [11 (5.8%)]. In our review, there was significant heterogeneity in the choice of end-points in TBI clinical research. There is an urgent need for consensus and homogeneity to improve the quality of clinical research in this area.
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials Targeting Early Interventions in Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Yvan Derouin, Thomas Delhomme, Yoann Launey, Marwan Bouras, Bénédicte Sautenet, Véronique Sébille, Raphaël Cinotti","doi":"10.1089/neu.2023.0417","DOIUrl":"10.1089/neu.2023.0417","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the cornerstone to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention. To assess the methodology of clinical research, we performed a systematic review that evaluated the different outcomes used in RCTs targeting the early phase of moderate-to-severe adult TBI from 1983 to October 31, 2023. We extracted each outcome and organized them according to the COMET and OMERACT framework (core area, broad domains, target domains, and finally outcomes). A total of 190 RCTs were included, including 52,010 participants. A total of 557 outcomes were reported and classified between the following core areas: pathophysiological manifestations [169 RCTs (88.9%)], life impact [117 RCTs (61.6%)], death [94 RCTs (49.5%)], resource use [72 RCTs (37.9%)], and adverse events [41 RCTs (21.6%)]. We identified 29 broad domains and 89 target domains. Among target domains, physical functioning [111 (58.4%)], mortality [94 (49.5%)], intracranial pressure target domain [68 (35.8%)], and hemodynamics [53 (27.9%)] were the most frequent. Outcomes were mostly clinician-reported [177 (93.2%)], while patient-reported outcomes were rarely reported [11 (5.8%)]. In our review, there was significant heterogeneity in the choice of end-points in TBI clinical research. There is an urgent need for consensus and homogeneity to improve the quality of clinical research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"2238-2247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141626943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-04-18DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0553
Thijs Vande Vyvere, Dana Pisică, Guido Wilms, Lene Claes, Pieter Van Dyck, Annemiek Snoeckx, Luc van den Hauwe, Pim Pullens, Jan Verheyden, Max Wintermark, Sven Dekeyzer, Christine L Mac Donald, Andrew I R Maas, Paul M Parizel
<p><p>In 2010, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) created a set of common data elements (CDEs) to help standardize the assessment and reporting of imaging findings in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, as opposed to other standardized radiology reporting systems, a visual overview and data to support the proposed standardized lexicon are lacking. We used over 4000 admission computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with TBI from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study to develop an extensive pictorial overview of the NINDS TBI CDEs, with visual examples and background information on individual pathoanatomical lesion types, up to the level of supplemental and emerging information (e.g., location and estimated volumes). We documented the frequency of lesion occurrence, aiming to quantify the relative importance of different CDEs for characterizing TBI, and performed a critical appraisal of our experience with the intent to inform updating of the CDEs. In addition, we investigated the co-occurrence and clustering of lesion types and the distribution of six CT classification systems. The median age of the 4087 patients in our dataset was 50 years (interquartile range, 29-66; range, 0-96), including 238 patients under 18 years old (5.8%). Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (45.3%), skull fractures (37.4%), contusions (31.3%), and acute subdural hematoma (28.9%) were the most frequently occurring CT findings in acute TBI. The ranking of these lesions was the same in patients with mild TBI (baseline Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 13-15) compared with those with moderate-severe TBI (baseline GCS score 3-12), but the frequency of occurrence was up to three times higher in moderate-severe TBI. In most TBI patients with CT abnormalities, there was co-occurrence and clustering of different lesion types, with significant differences between mild and moderate-severe TBI patients. More specifically, lesion patterns were more complex in moderate-severe TBI patients, with more co-existing lesions and more frequent signs of mass effect. These patients also had higher and more heterogeneous CT score distributions, associated with worse predicted outcomes. The critical appraisal of the NINDS CDEs was highly positive, but revealed that full assessment can be time consuming, that some CDEs had very low frequencies, and identified a few redundancies and ambiguity in some definitions. Whilst primarily developed for research, implementation of CDE templates for use in clinical practice is advocated, but this will require development of an abbreviated version. In conclusion, with this study, we provide an educational resource for clinicians and researchers to help assess, characterize, and report the vast and complex spectrum of imaging findings in patients with TBI. Our data provides a comprehensive overview of the contemporary landscape of TBI imaging pathology in Eur
{"title":"Imaging Findings in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: a National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Element-Based Pictorial Review and Analysis of Over 4000 Admission Brain Computed Tomography Scans from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study.","authors":"Thijs Vande Vyvere, Dana Pisică, Guido Wilms, Lene Claes, Pieter Van Dyck, Annemiek Snoeckx, Luc van den Hauwe, Pim Pullens, Jan Verheyden, Max Wintermark, Sven Dekeyzer, Christine L Mac Donald, Andrew I R Maas, Paul M Parizel","doi":"10.1089/neu.2023.0553","DOIUrl":"10.1089/neu.2023.0553","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2010, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) created a set of common data elements (CDEs) to help standardize the assessment and reporting of imaging findings in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, as opposed to other standardized radiology reporting systems, a visual overview and data to support the proposed standardized lexicon are lacking. We used over 4000 admission computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with TBI from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study to develop an extensive pictorial overview of the NINDS TBI CDEs, with visual examples and background information on individual pathoanatomical lesion types, up to the level of supplemental and emerging information (e.g., location and estimated volumes). We documented the frequency of lesion occurrence, aiming to quantify the relative importance of different CDEs for characterizing TBI, and performed a critical appraisal of our experience with the intent to inform updating of the CDEs. In addition, we investigated the co-occurrence and clustering of lesion types and the distribution of six CT classification systems. The median age of the 4087 patients in our dataset was 50 years (interquartile range, 29-66; range, 0-96), including 238 patients under 18 years old (5.8%). Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (45.3%), skull fractures (37.4%), contusions (31.3%), and acute subdural hematoma (28.9%) were the most frequently occurring CT findings in acute TBI. The ranking of these lesions was the same in patients with mild TBI (baseline Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 13-15) compared with those with moderate-severe TBI (baseline GCS score 3-12), but the frequency of occurrence was up to three times higher in moderate-severe TBI. In most TBI patients with CT abnormalities, there was co-occurrence and clustering of different lesion types, with significant differences between mild and moderate-severe TBI patients. More specifically, lesion patterns were more complex in moderate-severe TBI patients, with more co-existing lesions and more frequent signs of mass effect. These patients also had higher and more heterogeneous CT score distributions, associated with worse predicted outcomes. The critical appraisal of the NINDS CDEs was highly positive, but revealed that full assessment can be time consuming, that some CDEs had very low frequencies, and identified a few redundancies and ambiguity in some definitions. Whilst primarily developed for research, implementation of CDE templates for use in clinical practice is advocated, but this will require development of an abbreviated version. In conclusion, with this study, we provide an educational resource for clinicians and researchers to help assess, characterize, and report the vast and complex spectrum of imaging findings in patients with TBI. Our data provides a comprehensive overview of the contemporary landscape of TBI imaging pathology in Eur","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"2248-2297"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140119733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-05-13DOI: 10.1089/neu.2024.0014
William R Sanders, Jason K Barber, Nancy R Temkin, Brandon Foreman, Joseph T Giacino, Theresa Williamson, Brian L Edlow, Geoffrey T Manley, Yelena G Bodien
Among patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), there is high prognostic uncertainty but growing evidence that recovery of independence is possible. Nevertheless, families are often asked to make decisions about withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) within days of injury. The range of potential outcomes for patients who died after WLST (WLST+) is unknown, posing a challenge for prognostic modeling and clinical counseling. We investigated the potential for survival and recovery of independence after acute TBI in patients who died after WLST. We used Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) data and propensity score matching to pair participants with WLST+ to those with a similar probability of WLST (based on demographic and clinical characteristics), but for whom life-sustaining treatment was not withdrawn (WLST-). To optimize matching, we divided the WLST- cohort into tiers (Tier 1 = 0-11%, Tier 2 = 11-27%, Tier 3 = 27-70% WLST propensity). We estimated the level of recovery that could be expected in WLST+ participants by evaluating 3-, 6-, and 12-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) and Disability Rating Scale outcomes in matched WLST- participants. Of 90 WLST+ participants (80% male, mean [standard deviation; SD] age = 59.2 [17.9] years, median [IQR] days to WLST = 5.4 [2.2, 11.7]), 80 could be matched to WLST- participants. Of 56 WLST- participants who were followed at 6 months, 31 (55%) died. Among survivors in the overall sample and survivors in Tiers 1 and 2, more than 30% recovered at least partial independence (GOSE ≥4). In Tier 3, recovery to GOSE ≥4 occurred at 12 months, but not 6 months, post-injury. These results suggest a substantial proportion of patients with TBI and WLST may have survived and achieved at least partial independence. However, death or severe disability is a common outcome when the probability of WLST is high. While further validation is needed, our findings support a more cautious clinical approach to WLST and more complete reporting on WLST in TBI studies.
{"title":"Recovery Potential in Patients Who Died After Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment: A TRACK-TBI Propensity Score Analysis.","authors":"William R Sanders, Jason K Barber, Nancy R Temkin, Brandon Foreman, Joseph T Giacino, Theresa Williamson, Brian L Edlow, Geoffrey T Manley, Yelena G Bodien","doi":"10.1089/neu.2024.0014","DOIUrl":"10.1089/neu.2024.0014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), there is high prognostic uncertainty but growing evidence that recovery of independence is possible. Nevertheless, families are often asked to make decisions about withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) within days of injury. The range of potential outcomes for patients who died after WLST (WLST+) is unknown, posing a challenge for prognostic modeling and clinical counseling. We investigated the potential for survival and recovery of independence after acute TBI in patients who died after WLST. We used Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) data and propensity score matching to pair participants with WLST+ to those with a similar probability of WLST (based on demographic and clinical characteristics), but for whom life-sustaining treatment was not withdrawn (WLST-). To optimize matching, we divided the WLST- cohort into tiers (Tier 1 = 0-11%, Tier 2 = 11-27%, Tier 3 = 27-70% WLST propensity). We estimated the level of recovery that could be expected in WLST+ participants by evaluating 3-, 6-, and 12-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) and Disability Rating Scale outcomes in matched WLST- participants. Of 90 WLST+ participants (80% male, mean [standard deviation; SD] age = 59.2 [17.9] years, median [IQR] days to WLST = 5.4 [2.2, 11.7]), 80 could be matched to WLST- participants. Of 56 WLST- participants who were followed at 6 months, 31 (55%) died. Among survivors in the overall sample and survivors in Tiers 1 and 2, more than 30% recovered at least partial independence (GOSE ≥4). In Tier 3, recovery to GOSE ≥4 occurred at 12 months, but not 6 months, post-injury. These results suggest a substantial proportion of patients with TBI and WLST may have survived and achieved at least partial independence. However, death or severe disability is a common outcome when the probability of WLST is high. While further validation is needed, our findings support a more cautious clinical approach to WLST and more complete reporting on WLST in TBI studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"2336-2348"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564834/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140912490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-06-27DOI: 10.1089/neu.2024.0027
Sandro M Krieg, Maximilian Schwendner, Leonie Kram, Haosu Zhang, Raimunde Liang, Chiara Negwer, Bernhard Meyer
For many years, noninvasive methods to measure intracranial pressure (ICP) have been unsuccessful. However, such methods are crucial for the assessment of patients with nonpenetrating traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) who are unconscious. In this study, we explored the use of transcranial transmission ultrasound (TTUS) to gather experimental data through brain pulsatility, assessing its effectiveness in detecting high ICP using machine learning analysis. We included patients with severe TBI under invasive ICP monitoring in our intensive care unit. During periods of both normal and elevated ICP, we simultaneously recorded ICP, arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and TTUS measurements. Our classification model was based on data from 9 patients, encompassing 387 instances of elevated ICP (>15 mmHg) and 345 instances of normal ICP (<10 mmHg), and validated through a leave-one-subject-out method. The study, conducted from October 2021 to October 2022, involved 25 patients with an average age of 61.6 ± 17.6 years, producing 279 datasets with an average ICP of 11.3 mmHg (1st quartile 6.1 mmHg; 3rd quartile 14.8 mmHg). The automated TTUS analysis effectively identified ICP values over 15 mmHg with 100% sensitivity and 47% specificity. It achieved a 100% negative predictive value and a 14% positive predictive value. This suggests that TTUS can accurately rule out high ICP above 15 mmHg in TBI patients, indicating patients who may need immediate imaging or intervention. These promising results, if confirmed and expanded in larger studies, could lead to the first reliable, noninvasive screening tool for detecting elevated ICP.
{"title":"Transcranial Transmission Ultrasound for Reliable Noninvasive Exclusion of Intracranial Hypertension in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Proof of Concept Study.","authors":"Sandro M Krieg, Maximilian Schwendner, Leonie Kram, Haosu Zhang, Raimunde Liang, Chiara Negwer, Bernhard Meyer","doi":"10.1089/neu.2024.0027","DOIUrl":"10.1089/neu.2024.0027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For many years, noninvasive methods to measure intracranial pressure (ICP) have been unsuccessful. However, such methods are crucial for the assessment of patients with nonpenetrating traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) who are unconscious. In this study, we explored the use of transcranial transmission ultrasound (TTUS) to gather experimental data through brain pulsatility, assessing its effectiveness in detecting high ICP using machine learning analysis. We included patients with severe TBI under invasive ICP monitoring in our intensive care unit. During periods of both normal and elevated ICP, we simultaneously recorded ICP, arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and TTUS measurements. Our classification model was based on data from 9 patients, encompassing 387 instances of elevated ICP (>15 mmHg) and 345 instances of normal ICP (<10 mmHg), and validated through a leave-one-subject-out method. The study, conducted from October 2021 to October 2022, involved 25 patients with an average age of 61.6 ± 17.6 years, producing 279 datasets with an average ICP of 11.3 mmHg (1st quartile 6.1 mmHg; 3rd quartile 14.8 mmHg). The automated TTUS analysis effectively identified ICP values over 15 mmHg with 100% sensitivity and 47% specificity. It achieved a 100% negative predictive value and a 14% positive predictive value. This suggests that TTUS can accurately rule out high ICP above 15 mmHg in TBI patients, indicating patients who may need immediate imaging or intervention. These promising results, if confirmed and expanded in larger studies, could lead to the first reliable, noninvasive screening tool for detecting elevated ICP.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"2298-2306"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141236979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-07-13DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0550
Nathan E Cook, Alicia Kissinger-Knox, Ila A Iverson, Katie Stephenson, Marc A Norman, Amy A Hunter, Altaf Saadi, Grant L Iverson
This review was designed to (1) determine the extent to which the clinical science on sport-related concussion treatment and rehabilitation has considered social determinants of health (SDoH) or health equity and (2) offer recommendations to enhance the incorporation of SDoH and health equity in concussion treatment research and clinical care. The Concussion in Sport Group consensus statement (2023) was informed by two systematic reviews examining prescribed rest or exercise following concussion and targeted interventions to facilitate concussion recovery. We examined 31 studies, including 2,698 participants, from those two reviews. Race (k = 6; 19.4%) and ethnicity (k = 4; 12.9%) of the study samples were usually not reported. Four studies examined ethnicity (i.e., Hispanic), exclusively as a demographic category. Five studies (16.1%) examined race as a demographic category. Three studies (9.7%) examined socioeconomic status (SES; measured as household income) as a demographic category/sample descriptor and one study (3.2%) examined SES in-depth, by testing whether the treatment and control groups differed by SES. Five studies examined an SDoH domain in a descriptive manner and four studies in an inferential/intentional manner. No study mentioned SDoH, health equity, or disparities by name. Many studies (61.3%) excluded participants based on demographic, sociocultural, or health factors, primarily due to language proficiency. The new consensus statement includes recommendations for concussion treatment and rehabilitation that rely on an evidence base that has not included SDoH or studies addressing health equity. Researchers are encouraged to design treatment and rehabilitation studies that focus specifically on underrepresented groups to determine if they have specific and unique treatment and rehabilitation needs, whether certain practical modifications to treatment protocols might be necessary, and whether completion rates and treatment adherence and response are similar.
{"title":"Social Determinants of Health and Health Equity in the Treatment and Rehabilitation of Sport-Related Concussion: A Content Analysis of Intervention Research and Call-To-Action.","authors":"Nathan E Cook, Alicia Kissinger-Knox, Ila A Iverson, Katie Stephenson, Marc A Norman, Amy A Hunter, Altaf Saadi, Grant L Iverson","doi":"10.1089/neu.2023.0550","DOIUrl":"10.1089/neu.2023.0550","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review was designed to (1) determine the extent to which the clinical science on sport-related concussion treatment and rehabilitation has considered social determinants of health (SDoH) or health equity and (2) offer recommendations to enhance the incorporation of SDoH and health equity in concussion treatment research and clinical care. The Concussion in Sport Group consensus statement (2023) was informed by two systematic reviews examining prescribed rest or exercise following concussion and targeted interventions to facilitate concussion recovery. We examined 31 studies, including 2,698 participants, from those two reviews. Race (<i>k</i> = 6; 19.4%) and ethnicity (<i>k</i> = 4; 12.9%) of the study samples were usually not reported. Four studies examined ethnicity (i.e., Hispanic), exclusively as a demographic category. Five studies (16.1%) examined race as a demographic category. Three studies (9.7%) examined socioeconomic status (SES; measured as household income) as a demographic category/sample descriptor and one study (3.2%) examined SES in-depth, by testing whether the treatment and control groups differed by SES. Five studies examined an SDoH domain in a descriptive manner and four studies in an inferential/intentional manner. No study mentioned SDoH, health equity, or disparities by name. Many studies (61.3%) excluded participants based on demographic, sociocultural, or health factors, primarily due to language proficiency. The new consensus statement includes recommendations for concussion treatment and rehabilitation that rely on an evidence base that has not included SDoH or studies addressing health equity. Researchers are encouraged to design treatment and rehabilitation studies that focus specifically on underrepresented groups to determine if they have specific and unique treatment and rehabilitation needs, whether certain practical modifications to treatment protocols might be necessary, and whether completion rates and treatment adherence and response are similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"2201-2218"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564856/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140957902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-04-05DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0543
Carrie Esopenko, Divya Jain, Shambhu Prasad Adhikari, Kristen Dams-O'Connor, Michael Ellis, Halina Lin Haag, Elizabeth S Hovenden, Finian Keleher, Inga K Koerte, Hannah M Lindsey, Amy D Marshall, Karen Mason, J Scott McNally, Deleene S Menefee, Tricia L Merkley, Emma N Read, Philine Rojcyk, Sandy R Shultz, Mujun Sun, Danielle Toccalino, Eve M Valera, Paul van Donkelaar, Cheryl Wellington, Elisabeth A Wilde
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant, global public health concern. Women, individuals with historically underrepresented identities, and disabilities are at high risk for IPV and tend to experience severe injuries. There has been growing concern about the risk of exposure to IPV-related head trauma, resulting in IPV-related brain injury (IPV-BI), and its health consequences. Past work suggests that a significant proportion of women exposed to IPV experience IPV-BI, likely representing a distinct phenotype compared with BI of other etiologies. An IPV-BI often co-occurs with psychological trauma and mental health complaints, leading to unique issues related to identifying, prognosticating, and managing IPV-BI outcomes. The goal of this review is to identify important gaps in research and clinical practice in IPV-BI and suggest potential solutions to address them. We summarize IPV research in five key priority areas: (1) unique considerations for IPV-BI study design; (2) understanding non-fatal strangulation as a form of BI; (3) identifying objective biomarkers of IPV-BI; (4) consideration of the chronicity, cumulative and late effects of IPV-BI; and (5) BI as a risk factor for IPV engagement. Our review concludes with a call to action to help investigators develop ecologically valid research studies addressing the identified clinical-research knowledge gaps and strategies to improve care in individuals exposed to IPV-BI. By reducing the current gaps and answering these calls to action, we will approach IPV-BI in a trauma-informed manner, ultimately improving outcomes and quality of life for those impacted by IPV-BI.
{"title":"Intimate Partner Violence-Related Brain Injury: Unmasking and Addressing the Gaps.","authors":"Carrie Esopenko, Divya Jain, Shambhu Prasad Adhikari, Kristen Dams-O'Connor, Michael Ellis, Halina Lin Haag, Elizabeth S Hovenden, Finian Keleher, Inga K Koerte, Hannah M Lindsey, Amy D Marshall, Karen Mason, J Scott McNally, Deleene S Menefee, Tricia L Merkley, Emma N Read, Philine Rojcyk, Sandy R Shultz, Mujun Sun, Danielle Toccalino, Eve M Valera, Paul van Donkelaar, Cheryl Wellington, Elisabeth A Wilde","doi":"10.1089/neu.2023.0543","DOIUrl":"10.1089/neu.2023.0543","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant, global public health concern. Women, individuals with historically underrepresented identities, and disabilities are at high risk for IPV and tend to experience severe injuries. There has been growing concern about the risk of exposure to IPV-related head trauma, resulting in IPV-related brain injury (IPV-BI), and its health consequences. Past work suggests that a significant proportion of women exposed to IPV experience IPV-BI, likely representing a distinct phenotype compared with BI of other etiologies. An IPV-BI often co-occurs with psychological trauma and mental health complaints, leading to unique issues related to identifying, prognosticating, and managing IPV-BI outcomes. The goal of this review is to identify important gaps in research and clinical practice in IPV-BI and suggest potential solutions to address them. We summarize IPV research in five key priority areas: (1) unique considerations for IPV-BI study design; (2) understanding non-fatal strangulation as a form of BI; (3) identifying objective biomarkers of IPV-BI; (4) consideration of the chronicity, cumulative and late effects of IPV-BI; and (5) BI as a risk factor for IPV engagement. Our review concludes with a call to action to help investigators develop ecologically valid research studies addressing the identified clinical-research knowledge gaps and strategies to improve care in individuals exposed to IPV-BI. By reducing the current gaps and answering these calls to action, we will approach IPV-BI in a trauma-informed manner, ultimately improving outcomes and quality of life for those impacted by IPV-BI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"2219-2237"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564844/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139697736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Editorial commentary on NEU-2023-0576.R2, \"Acute Development of Traumatic Intracranial Aneurysms Following Civilian Gunshot Wounds to the Head\".","authors":"Rocco Armonda,Andrii Sirko","doi":"10.1089/neu.2024.0451","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0451","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142266232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
John D Corrigan,Flora McConnell Hammond,Angelle Sander,Kurt Kroenke
Many clinicians believe that residual impairments due to traumatic brain injury (TBI) are static once initial recovery has plateaued. That is, the effcts of the injury are not expected to change significantly over the remainder of a person's life. This assumption has been called into question by several independent longitudinal studies showing that the long-term course of TBI may be better characterized as dynamic rather than static. Healthcare services that recognize brain injury as a chronic condition would encourage education on self-management to improve or protect health, as well as proactive healthcare that anticipates common co-morbidities. Those who have had a TBI would be encouraged to engage in lifestyles that optimize wellness. Almost all developed countries commit additional public health resources to addressing chronic conditions. In the United States, specific benefits are available from health insurance plans, particularly Medicare and Medicaid, for persons experiencing chronic health conditions. Potentially the most important benefit would derive from healthcare practitioners becoming aware of the dynamic nature of chronic brain injury and thus being more attentive to how their patients could be better served to optimize improvement and minimize decline. Recognition of TBI as a chronic condition would not only focus more resources on problems assoiciated with living with brain injury, but would enhance both the public's and professionals' awareness of how to optimize the health and well-being of persons living with the effects of TBI.
{"title":"Recognition of Traumatic Brain Injury as a Chronic Condition: A Commentary.","authors":"John D Corrigan,Flora McConnell Hammond,Angelle Sander,Kurt Kroenke","doi":"10.1089/neu.2024.0356","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0356","url":null,"abstract":"Many clinicians believe that residual impairments due to traumatic brain injury (TBI) are static once initial recovery has plateaued. That is, the effcts of the injury are not expected to change significantly over the remainder of a person's life. This assumption has been called into question by several independent longitudinal studies showing that the long-term course of TBI may be better characterized as dynamic rather than static. Healthcare services that recognize brain injury as a chronic condition would encourage education on self-management to improve or protect health, as well as proactive healthcare that anticipates common co-morbidities. Those who have had a TBI would be encouraged to engage in lifestyles that optimize wellness. Almost all developed countries commit additional public health resources to addressing chronic conditions. In the United States, specific benefits are available from health insurance plans, particularly Medicare and Medicaid, for persons experiencing chronic health conditions. Potentially the most important benefit would derive from healthcare practitioners becoming aware of the dynamic nature of chronic brain injury and thus being more attentive to how their patients could be better served to optimize improvement and minimize decline. Recognition of TBI as a chronic condition would not only focus more resources on problems assoiciated with living with brain injury, but would enhance both the public's and professionals' awareness of how to optimize the health and well-being of persons living with the effects of TBI.","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142266233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}