Pub Date : 2024-10-04DOI: 10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24480
Keisuke Takai, Takeaki Endo, Takashi Komori
Objective: Patients with spinal CSF leaks often have ventral dural abnormalities (type 1 CSF leaks); however, the pathological mechanism for developing dural abnormalities is unknown. The authors investigated whether calcified dural ligaments contribute to the development of ventral dural tears, which cause spinal CSF leaks.
Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed with type 1 CSF leaks who had spiculated spinal lesions between 2010 and 2024 were included. Clinical, radiological, surgical, and histological findings were reviewed.
Results: Nineteen patients with type 1 CSF fistulas had spiculated spinal lesions (15 men; median age 47 years, range 28-71 years). Spiculated lesions showed a high density on CT, and the median lesion length was 3.5 mm (range 1.6-9.1 mm). Spiculated lesions were consistently located at the center of the ventral dural abnormalities, penetrated the dura mater, and were located in the high thoracic spine (T1-5) in 13 patients (68%) and in the low thoracic spine (T8-12) in 6 (32%). These spinal lesions were connected to the posterior longitudinal ligament, but not to the vertebral body or disc. Histologically, they did not include degenerative osteophytic or discogenic tissues, mostly comprised fibrotic tissues with some calcification, and were consistent with calcified dural ligaments.
Conclusions: The anatomical characteristics of spiculated spinal lesions associated with ventral dural abnormalities are consistent with those of calcified dural ligaments, referred to as Hofmann's ligaments. These ligaments are important for neurosurgeons, neurologists, and neuroradiologists who diagnose and treat type 1 CSF fistulas.
{"title":"Calcified Hofmann's ligaments as the cause of spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks associated with spinal ventral dural tears.","authors":"Keisuke Takai, Takeaki Endo, Takashi Komori","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24480","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24480","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with spinal CSF leaks often have ventral dural abnormalities (type 1 CSF leaks); however, the pathological mechanism for developing dural abnormalities is unknown. The authors investigated whether calcified dural ligaments contribute to the development of ventral dural tears, which cause spinal CSF leaks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients diagnosed with type 1 CSF leaks who had spiculated spinal lesions between 2010 and 2024 were included. Clinical, radiological, surgical, and histological findings were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients with type 1 CSF fistulas had spiculated spinal lesions (15 men; median age 47 years, range 28-71 years). Spiculated lesions showed a high density on CT, and the median lesion length was 3.5 mm (range 1.6-9.1 mm). Spiculated lesions were consistently located at the center of the ventral dural abnormalities, penetrated the dura mater, and were located in the high thoracic spine (T1-5) in 13 patients (68%) and in the low thoracic spine (T8-12) in 6 (32%). These spinal lesions were connected to the posterior longitudinal ligament, but not to the vertebral body or disc. Histologically, they did not include degenerative osteophytic or discogenic tissues, mostly comprised fibrotic tissues with some calcification, and were consistent with calcified dural ligaments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The anatomical characteristics of spiculated spinal lesions associated with ventral dural abnormalities are consistent with those of calcified dural ligaments, referred to as Hofmann's ligaments. These ligaments are important for neurosurgeons, neurologists, and neuroradiologists who diagnose and treat type 1 CSF fistulas.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142375506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-04DOI: 10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24768
Atul Goel
{"title":"Letter to the Editor. Scoliosis with syringomyelia.","authors":"Atul Goel","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24768","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24768","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142375507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Letter to the Editor. Significance of inflammation and immune markers in surgery for spinal metastasis.","authors":"Tomoaki Nagahama, Tomohito Yoshihara, Hirohito Hirata, Masatsugu Tsukamoto, Tadatsugu Morimoto","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24680","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24680","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-27DOI: 10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24311
Abraham Dada, Cecilia Dalle Ore, Praveen V Mummaneni, Arati Patel, Vardhaan Ambati, Katie O Orrico, Luis M Tumialán, Joseph S Cheng, John J Knightly, Anthony M DiGiorgio
Objective: This study aimed to report changes in utilization and payment trends of low-back pain (LBP) interventions and the impact of nonsurgeon interventionalists on these changes.
Methods: Medicare Part B national summary data files were used to gather annual utilization and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) payment data for LBP interventions from 2000 to 2021. Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes were grouped as decompression, spinal fusion, sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion, epidural steroid injections (ESIs), physical therapy (PT), and chiropractic manipulation (Chiro). The total allowed services and payments were collected for each HCPCS group. CMS provider-level files, available from 2013 to 2021, were used to collect neurosurgeon, orthopedic surgeon, and nonsurgeon interventionalist (interventional radiology and pain management) data for each surgical HCPCS code group (decompression, spinal fusion, and SI joint fusion). The United States Consumer Price Index was used to adjust for inflation.
Results: From 2000 to 2021, there were 339,720,725 Medicare-approved interventions and payments of approximately $21 billion for LBP (percentage of cumulative payments: 41.8% Chiro, 16.5% ESI, 14.4% spinal fusion, 14.3% PT, 10.2% decompression, and 0.4% SI joint fusion). In a subgroup analysis, spinal fusions for Medicare patients were performed by orthopedic surgeons (59.2%), neurosurgeons (40.6%), and nonsurgeon interventionalists (< 1%) from 2013 to 2021. From 2013 to 2021, neurosurgeon and orthopedic surgeon fusion utilization each grew by < 3% and associated Medicare payments to each specialty declined by 1% each year. During the same period, nonsurgeon interventionalist utilization grew 26% each year and associated Medicare payments to nonsurgeon interventionalists for spine fusions grew 62% each year. In a subgroup analysis, SI joint fusions for Medicare patients were performed by orthopedic surgeons (50.7%), neurosurgeons (24.8%), and nonsurgeon interventionalists (24.5%) from 2018 to 2021. Neurosurgeon utilization of SI joint fusion declined by 1% each year and associated Medicare payments to this group grew 2% each year. Orthopedic surgeon utilization of SI joint fusion declined 1% and associated Medicare payments to this group grew 4% each year. Nonsurgeon interventionalist use of SI joint fusions grew 415% and payments grew 435% each year.
Conclusions: The substantial growth in Medicare payments for surgical LBP interventions is disproportionally driven by nonsurgeon interventionalists. The exponential growth of nonsurgeon interventionalists performing spinal fusion surgeries, particularly SI joint fusions, largely accounts for the significant increase in Medicare expenditures.
目的:本研究旨在报告腰背痛介入治疗的使用和支付趋势变化,以及非外科医生介入治疗对这些变化的影响:本研究旨在报告腰背痛(LBP)介入治疗的使用和支付趋势的变化,以及非外科医生介入治疗师对这些变化的影响:方法:使用联邦医疗保险 B 部分国家汇总数据文件收集 2000 年至 2021 年腰背痛介入治疗的年度使用情况和联邦医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的支付数据。医疗保健通用程序编码系统(HCPCS)代码被归类为减压、脊柱融合、骶髂关节(SI)融合、硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)、理疗(PT)和脊椎推拿(Chiro)。我们收集了每个 HCPCS 组的允许服务和支付总额。CMS 医疗服务提供者级别文件(2013 年至 2021 年)用于收集神经外科医生、整形外科医生和非外科医生介入医生(介入放射学和疼痛管理)在每个手术 HCPCS 代码组(减压、脊柱融合和 SI 关节融合)中的数据。使用美国消费者价格指数对通货膨胀进行调整:从 2000 年到 2021 年,共有 339720725 项医疗保险批准的干预措施和约 210 亿美元的腰椎间盘突出症支付费用(占累计支付费用的百分比:脊柱治疗占 41.8%,腰椎间盘突出症占 16.8%):41.8%的脊柱治疗、16.5%的ESI、14.4%的脊柱融合、14.3%的PT、10.2%的减压和0.4%的SI关节融合)。在一项分组分析中,从 2013 年到 2021 年,为医保患者实施脊柱融合术的分别是矫形外科医生(59.2%)、神经外科医生(40.6%)和非外科医生介入医生(< 1%)。从 2013 年到 2021 年,神经外科医生和矫形外科医生的融合术使用率增长均小于 3%,而每个专科的相关医疗保险支付额每年均下降 1%。同期,非外科医生介入治疗的使用率每年增长 26%,非外科医生介入治疗脊柱融合术的相关医疗保险支付额每年增长 62%。在一项分组分析中,从 2018 年到 2021 年,为医保患者实施 SI 关节融合术的分别是骨科医生(50.7%)、神经外科医生(24.8%)和非外科医生介入医师(24.5%)。神经外科医生对 SI 关节融合术的利用率每年下降 1%,而对该群体的相关医疗保险支付每年增长 2%。矫形外科医生对 SI 关节融合术的使用率每年下降 1%,而与此相关的医疗保险支付每年增长 4%。非外科医生介入治疗 SI 关节融合术的使用率每年增长 415%,支付的费用每年增长 435%:结论:医疗保险对腰椎间盘突出症外科干预的支付大幅增长主要是由非外科医生介入治疗师推动的。非外科介入医师脊柱融合手术(尤其是 SI 关节融合术)的指数式增长在很大程度上导致了医疗保险支出的大幅增长。
{"title":"The exponential growth of nonsurgeons performing fusions for low-back pain.","authors":"Abraham Dada, Cecilia Dalle Ore, Praveen V Mummaneni, Arati Patel, Vardhaan Ambati, Katie O Orrico, Luis M Tumialán, Joseph S Cheng, John J Knightly, Anthony M DiGiorgio","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24311","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24311","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to report changes in utilization and payment trends of low-back pain (LBP) interventions and the impact of nonsurgeon interventionalists on these changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medicare Part B national summary data files were used to gather annual utilization and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) payment data for LBP interventions from 2000 to 2021. Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes were grouped as decompression, spinal fusion, sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion, epidural steroid injections (ESIs), physical therapy (PT), and chiropractic manipulation (Chiro). The total allowed services and payments were collected for each HCPCS group. CMS provider-level files, available from 2013 to 2021, were used to collect neurosurgeon, orthopedic surgeon, and nonsurgeon interventionalist (interventional radiology and pain management) data for each surgical HCPCS code group (decompression, spinal fusion, and SI joint fusion). The United States Consumer Price Index was used to adjust for inflation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2000 to 2021, there were 339,720,725 Medicare-approved interventions and payments of approximately $21 billion for LBP (percentage of cumulative payments: 41.8% Chiro, 16.5% ESI, 14.4% spinal fusion, 14.3% PT, 10.2% decompression, and 0.4% SI joint fusion). In a subgroup analysis, spinal fusions for Medicare patients were performed by orthopedic surgeons (59.2%), neurosurgeons (40.6%), and nonsurgeon interventionalists (< 1%) from 2013 to 2021. From 2013 to 2021, neurosurgeon and orthopedic surgeon fusion utilization each grew by < 3% and associated Medicare payments to each specialty declined by 1% each year. During the same period, nonsurgeon interventionalist utilization grew 26% each year and associated Medicare payments to nonsurgeon interventionalists for spine fusions grew 62% each year. In a subgroup analysis, SI joint fusions for Medicare patients were performed by orthopedic surgeons (50.7%), neurosurgeons (24.8%), and nonsurgeon interventionalists (24.5%) from 2018 to 2021. Neurosurgeon utilization of SI joint fusion declined by 1% each year and associated Medicare payments to this group grew 2% each year. Orthopedic surgeon utilization of SI joint fusion declined 1% and associated Medicare payments to this group grew 4% each year. Nonsurgeon interventionalist use of SI joint fusions grew 415% and payments grew 435% each year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The substantial growth in Medicare payments for surgical LBP interventions is disproportionally driven by nonsurgeon interventionalists. The exponential growth of nonsurgeon interventionalists performing spinal fusion surgeries, particularly SI joint fusions, largely accounts for the significant increase in Medicare expenditures.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-27DOI: 10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231401
Gisberto Evangelisti, Luigi Falzetti, Franziska C S Altorfer, Stefano Bandiera, Giovanni Barbanti Brodano, Marco Cianchetti, Maria R Fiore, Emanuela Palmerini, Joseph H Schwab, Stefano Boriani, Alessandro Gasbarrini
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of intralesional gross-total resection (GTR) followed by high-energy particle therapy with en bloc and intralesional resections.
Methods: A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with primary osteogenic sarcoma (OGS) of the spine between 2009 and 2020 was conducted. Demographic information, including age, affected site, tumor volume, and Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini stage, was collected. Additionally, information on metastases at diagnosis, length of stay, operating time, complications, planned surgical treatment, and radiotherapy was also collected. Outcome measures, including local recurrence (LR) and disease-specific survival (DSS), were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves.
Results: In total, 20 patients with a median age of 38 (IQR 23-60) years were included. The median follow-up was 15.7 (IQR 6.3-36.9) months. Eight patients underwent en bloc resection with a 38% (3 patients) LR rate and a median DSS of 26.4 months. Four patients received adjuvant high-energy particle therapy after planned GTR. Their median follow-up was 36 months; none of these patients experienced LR. Both the 1-year and 3-year DSSs were 100%. Another 8 patients underwent intralesional resection. Six of the 8 patients (75%) died of their disease, with a median survival of 7.3 (IQR 4.7-14) months.
Conclusions: GTR combined with adjuvant high-energy particle therapy appears to be a safe and effective alternative approach for patients with OGS of the spine when en bloc resection is not feasible. The results demonstrated a 3-year DSS of 100% and no major surgical complications.
{"title":"Intentional Enneking-inappropriate surgery and high-energy particle therapy for unresectable osteogenic sarcoma of the spine: a retrospective study.","authors":"Gisberto Evangelisti, Luigi Falzetti, Franziska C S Altorfer, Stefano Bandiera, Giovanni Barbanti Brodano, Marco Cianchetti, Maria R Fiore, Emanuela Palmerini, Joseph H Schwab, Stefano Boriani, Alessandro Gasbarrini","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231401","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231401","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of intralesional gross-total resection (GTR) followed by high-energy particle therapy with en bloc and intralesional resections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with primary osteogenic sarcoma (OGS) of the spine between 2009 and 2020 was conducted. Demographic information, including age, affected site, tumor volume, and Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini stage, was collected. Additionally, information on metastases at diagnosis, length of stay, operating time, complications, planned surgical treatment, and radiotherapy was also collected. Outcome measures, including local recurrence (LR) and disease-specific survival (DSS), were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 20 patients with a median age of 38 (IQR 23-60) years were included. The median follow-up was 15.7 (IQR 6.3-36.9) months. Eight patients underwent en bloc resection with a 38% (3 patients) LR rate and a median DSS of 26.4 months. Four patients received adjuvant high-energy particle therapy after planned GTR. Their median follow-up was 36 months; none of these patients experienced LR. Both the 1-year and 3-year DSSs were 100%. Another 8 patients underwent intralesional resection. Six of the 8 patients (75%) died of their disease, with a median survival of 7.3 (IQR 4.7-14) months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GTR combined with adjuvant high-energy particle therapy appears to be a safe and effective alternative approach for patients with OGS of the spine when en bloc resection is not feasible. The results demonstrated a 3-year DSS of 100% and no major surgical complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-20DOI: 10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24756
Kyohei Kin, Ryoji Tominaga, Hiroki Iwai, Hisashi Koga
{"title":"Letter to the Editor. Evidence for ultra-early outcome of full endoscopic spine surgery.","authors":"Kyohei Kin, Ryoji Tominaga, Hiroki Iwai, Hisashi Koga","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24756","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24756","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Primary spinal cord gliomas are rare, and among these astrocytomas (WHO grade II) are much rarer. The optimal treatment strategy thus remains unclear. The authors conducted a multicenter study led by the Neurospinal Society of Japan (NSJ) to analyze treatment policies and outcomes. The aim was to present optimal treatment methods for spinal cord astrocytoma and to identify predictors of better outcomes.
Methods: Among 1033 consecutive cases of spinal cord intramedullary tumors treated surgically at 58 centers affiliated with the NSJ, 57 patients were diagnosed with diffuse astrocytoma (WHO grade II) and were enrolled in the present study. Among these 57 patients, treatment methods, outcomes, and tumor proliferation rate as evaluated by the MIB-1 staining index (SI) were analyzed, and the optimal treatment method for spinal cord astrocytomas (grade II) was determined. In addition, the authors searched for factors predicting better treatment outcomes.
Results: Treatment for spinal cord astrocytoma comprised three methods: surgery alone in 30 patients, adjuvant radiation therapy in 13 patients, and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in 13 patients. One patient who did not undergo surgery was excluded from survival analysis. Treatment with surgery alone or surgery with radiotherapy was associated with significantly longer overall and progression-free survivals than that with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Patients treated with radiation therapy had a higher MIB-1 SI than those treated with surgery alone. The extent of tumor resection tended to correlate with longer survival. In contrast, postoperative neurological worsening showed the inverse order. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with the shortest survival in both total cases and recurrent cases. The optimal cutoff value of MIB-1 SI for predicting longer survival by surgery alone was less than 4.0%.
Conclusions: The optimal treatment for spinal cord astrocytoma is maximal tumor resection without neurological impairment. When some tumor remains in patients with an MIB-1 SI less than 4.0%, a wait-and-see approach is optimal. If the MIB-1 SI is higher than 4.0%, local radiation therapy is recommended. Adjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended for the treatment of grade II spinal cord astrocytoma.
目的:原发性脊髓胶质瘤非常罕见,其中星形细胞瘤(世卫组织 II 级)更为罕见。因此,最佳治疗策略仍不明确。作者在日本神经脊柱学会(NSJ)的领导下开展了一项多中心研究,分析治疗政策和结果。目的是介绍脊髓星形细胞瘤的最佳治疗方法,并找出预示更好疗效的因素:在隶属于 NSJ 的 58 个中心接受手术治疗的 1033 例脊髓髓内肿瘤患者中,有 57 例患者被诊断为弥漫性星形细胞瘤(WHO II 级),并被纳入本研究。在这 57 名患者中,作者分析了治疗方法、疗效和通过 MIB-1 染色指数(SI)评估的肿瘤增殖率,并确定了脊髓星形细胞瘤(II 级)的最佳治疗方法。此外,作者还寻找了预测更好治疗效果的因素:脊髓星形细胞瘤的治疗包括三种方法:30例患者单纯手术,13例患者辅助放疗,13例患者辅助化放疗。生存率分析中排除了一名未接受手术的患者。与辅助化学放疗相比,单纯手术治疗或手术加放疗的总生存期和无进展生存期明显更长。放疗患者的MIB-1 SI高于单纯手术患者。肿瘤切除范围往往与较长的生存期相关。与此相反,术后神经功能恶化则呈反序。在全部病例和复发病例中,辅助化放疗与最短的生存期相关。MIB-1 SI的最佳临界值小于4.0%,可预测单纯手术治疗的较长生存期:脊髓星形细胞瘤的最佳治疗方法是在不影响神经功能的情况下最大限度地切除肿瘤。结论:脊髓星形细胞瘤的最佳治疗方法是在不影响神经功能的情况下最大限度地切除肿瘤。当 MIB-1 SI 小于 4.0% 的患者仍有部分肿瘤残留时,最佳治疗方法是静观其变。如果 MIB-1 SI 高于 4.0%,建议进行局部放疗。不建议在治疗 II 级脊髓星形细胞瘤时采用辅助化疗。
{"title":"Optimal treatment strategy for low-grade spinal cord astrocytoma: a retrospective, multicenter analysis by the Neurospinal Society of Japan.","authors":"Seiji Shigekawa, Akihiro Inoue, Toshiki Endo, Jun Muto, Tomoo Inoue, Ryo Kanematsu, Takafumi Mitsuhara, Daisuke Umebayashi, Masaki Mizuno, Kazutoshi Hida, Takeharu Kunieda","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE24457","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.5.SPINE24457","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Primary spinal cord gliomas are rare, and among these astrocytomas (WHO grade II) are much rarer. The optimal treatment strategy thus remains unclear. The authors conducted a multicenter study led by the Neurospinal Society of Japan (NSJ) to analyze treatment policies and outcomes. The aim was to present optimal treatment methods for spinal cord astrocytoma and to identify predictors of better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 1033 consecutive cases of spinal cord intramedullary tumors treated surgically at 58 centers affiliated with the NSJ, 57 patients were diagnosed with diffuse astrocytoma (WHO grade II) and were enrolled in the present study. Among these 57 patients, treatment methods, outcomes, and tumor proliferation rate as evaluated by the MIB-1 staining index (SI) were analyzed, and the optimal treatment method for spinal cord astrocytomas (grade II) was determined. In addition, the authors searched for factors predicting better treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment for spinal cord astrocytoma comprised three methods: surgery alone in 30 patients, adjuvant radiation therapy in 13 patients, and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in 13 patients. One patient who did not undergo surgery was excluded from survival analysis. Treatment with surgery alone or surgery with radiotherapy was associated with significantly longer overall and progression-free survivals than that with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Patients treated with radiation therapy had a higher MIB-1 SI than those treated with surgery alone. The extent of tumor resection tended to correlate with longer survival. In contrast, postoperative neurological worsening showed the inverse order. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with the shortest survival in both total cases and recurrent cases. The optimal cutoff value of MIB-1 SI for predicting longer survival by surgery alone was less than 4.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimal treatment for spinal cord astrocytoma is maximal tumor resection without neurological impairment. When some tumor remains in patients with an MIB-1 SI less than 4.0%, a wait-and-see approach is optimal. If the MIB-1 SI is higher than 4.0%, local radiation therapy is recommended. Adjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended for the treatment of grade II spinal cord astrocytoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-20DOI: 10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24233
Songyuan An, Han Lin, Yaowu Zhang, Bo Pang, Hao Yan, Yun Liu, Long Wang, Yilin Wu, Ruichao Chai, Wenqing Jia, Yongzhi Wang
Objective: Patients with spinal cord astrocytomas (SCAs) are at high risk for CNS dissemination, yet comprehensive data on characteristics of dissemination are lacking. This study depicts the exact incidence and patterns of dissemination by analyzing data from a large-scale dataset of SCA.
Methods: The authors included 94 patients with SCA based on the 2021 WHO classification from 2011 to 2022, retrospectively collected their clinical and pathological characteristics, and analyzed factors influencing SCA dissemination.
Results: CNS dissemination, encompassing leptomeningeal spreading and/or subarachnoid seeding, was evaluated in 94 patients with and without H3 K27 alterations, with an overall dissemination rate reaching 85.0% at 5-year follow-up. Patients with altered H3 K27 had a significantly higher 5-year CNS dissemination rate than patients with H3 K27 wildtype status (95.2% vs 68.0%, p = 0.002). The median dissemination-free survival in H3 K27-altered patients was 14.37 (95% CI 2.84-25.89) months, significantly shorter than those with H3 K27 wildtype (statistics not calculated; p < 0.001). Based on univariate Cox regression analysis, H3 K27M alteration, higher histopathological grade, Ki-67 index (≥ 10%), and tumor length (≥ 4 segments) were identified as potential factors associated with CNS dissemination in SCAs. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that H3 K27M alteration appeared to be a risk factor for this phenomenon (HR 2.089, 95% CI 0.940-4.642, p = 0.070). Following dissemination, H3 K27-altered patients had a median postdissemination survival of 8.83 (95% CI 7.13-10.54) months, which was significantly shorter than the 13.40 (95% CI 3.98-34.26) months in those with H3 K27 wildtype (p = 0.008).
Conclusions: Factors indicative of higher SCA malignancy, such as H3 K27M alteration, higher histopathological grade, Ki-67 index (≥ 10%), and tumor length (≥ 4 segments), were similarly suggestive of higher rates of dissemination. The occurrence of dissemination is closely associated with the outcome events in patients with SCA.
目的:脊髓星形细胞瘤(SCA)患者是中枢神经系统播散的高危人群,但缺乏有关播散特征的全面数据。本研究通过分析大规模 SCA 数据集的数据,描述了传播的确切发生率和模式:作者纳入了2011年至2022年根据2021年WHO分类的94例SCA患者,回顾性收集了他们的临床和病理特征,并分析了影响SCA播散的因素:结果:评估了94例H3 K27改变和未改变患者的中枢神经系统播散情况,包括脑膜下播散和/或蛛网膜下腔播散,5年随访时总播散率达85.0%。H3 K27改变患者的5年中枢神经系统播散率明显高于H3 K27野生型患者(95.2% vs 68.0%,p = 0.002)。H3 K27变异患者的中位无播散生存期为14.37(95% CI 2.84-25.89)个月,明显短于H3 K27野生型患者(统计未计算;P < 0.001)。根据单变量Cox回归分析,H3 K27M改变、较高的组织病理学分级、Ki-67指数(≥10%)和肿瘤长度(≥4节)被确定为与SCA中枢神经系统播散相关的潜在因素。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,H3 K27M 改变似乎是这一现象的风险因素(HR 2.089,95% CI 0.940-4.642,p = 0.070)。播散后,H3 K27改变患者的中位播散后生存期为8.83(95% CI 7.13-10.54)个月,明显短于H3 K27野生型患者的13.40(95% CI 3.98-34.26)个月(P = 0.008):表明SCA恶性程度较高的因素,如H3 K27M改变、较高的组织病理学分级、Ki-67指数(≥10%)和肿瘤长度(≥4节),同样也表明扩散率较高。播散的发生与 SCA 患者的预后事件密切相关。
{"title":"Central nervous system dissemination in spinal cord astrocytomas: association with H3 K27M mutation.","authors":"Songyuan An, Han Lin, Yaowu Zhang, Bo Pang, Hao Yan, Yun Liu, Long Wang, Yilin Wu, Ruichao Chai, Wenqing Jia, Yongzhi Wang","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24233","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with spinal cord astrocytomas (SCAs) are at high risk for CNS dissemination, yet comprehensive data on characteristics of dissemination are lacking. This study depicts the exact incidence and patterns of dissemination by analyzing data from a large-scale dataset of SCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors included 94 patients with SCA based on the 2021 WHO classification from 2011 to 2022, retrospectively collected their clinical and pathological characteristics, and analyzed factors influencing SCA dissemination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CNS dissemination, encompassing leptomeningeal spreading and/or subarachnoid seeding, was evaluated in 94 patients with and without H3 K27 alterations, with an overall dissemination rate reaching 85.0% at 5-year follow-up. Patients with altered H3 K27 had a significantly higher 5-year CNS dissemination rate than patients with H3 K27 wildtype status (95.2% vs 68.0%, p = 0.002). The median dissemination-free survival in H3 K27-altered patients was 14.37 (95% CI 2.84-25.89) months, significantly shorter than those with H3 K27 wildtype (statistics not calculated; p < 0.001). Based on univariate Cox regression analysis, H3 K27M alteration, higher histopathological grade, Ki-67 index (≥ 10%), and tumor length (≥ 4 segments) were identified as potential factors associated with CNS dissemination in SCAs. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that H3 K27M alteration appeared to be a risk factor for this phenomenon (HR 2.089, 95% CI 0.940-4.642, p = 0.070). Following dissemination, H3 K27-altered patients had a median postdissemination survival of 8.83 (95% CI 7.13-10.54) months, which was significantly shorter than the 13.40 (95% CI 3.98-34.26) months in those with H3 K27 wildtype (p = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Factors indicative of higher SCA malignancy, such as H3 K27M alteration, higher histopathological grade, Ki-67 index (≥ 10%), and tumor length (≥ 4 segments), were similarly suggestive of higher rates of dissemination. The occurrence of dissemination is closely associated with the outcome events in patients with SCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-13DOI: 10.3171/2024.5.spine231223
Robert K Eastlack,Nikita Lakomkin,Stacie Tran,Michael Jelousi,Alex Soroceanu,Peter Passias,Themistocles Protopsaltis,Justin S Smith,Eric Klineberg,Shay Bess,Virginie Lafage,D Kojo Hamilton,Han Jo Kim,Douglas Burton,Christopher I Shaffrey,Christopher P Ames,Gregory Mundis
OBJECTIVECorrection of mild flexible cervical deformity (CD) via the posterior approach has been described with and without the use of posterior osteotomies (POs), despite a lack of clarity regarding their necessity or risks. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of POs when correcting mild flexible CD leads to improved clinical or radiographic outcomes, as well as defining the relative risks in utilizing them.METHODSA prospective multicenter registry of operative CD patients was analyzed. Inclusion criteria were cervical kyphosis > 10°, cervical scoliosis > 10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°. Mild deformity was defined by a cSVA of 3-5 cm and/or kyphosis < 15°. Flexibility was defined by a C2-7 angular change > 5° on preoperative flexion/extension radiographs. Patients who received a posterior column osteotomy (PCO) (Ames grades 1 and 2) were compared with patients who did not undergo a PCO (noPCO) as well as those who underwent a three-column osteotomy (3CO) (Ames grades 3-6).RESULTSNinety-five patients (33 PCO, 49 noPCO, 13 3CO) met the inclusion criteria. Both the number of levels fused (9.2 vs 7.7, p = 0.001) and the estimated blood loss (EBL) (1027 vs 486 mL, p = 0.012) were higher in the PCO cohort. Patients in the noPCO group were more likely to have a cervical apex of kyphosis (71.1%, p = 0.046), while those undergoing 3COs were more likely to have a thoracic apex (58.3%, p = 0.005). Preoperative cSVA (PCO vs noPCO: 45.4 vs 37.9 cm, p = 0.084), T1 slope (32.5° vs 29.6°, p = 0.376), C2-7 lordosis (-8.9° vs -9.2°, p = 0.942), and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score (13.4 vs 13.5, p = 0.854) were similar; however, both Neck Disability Index (NDI) (55.6 vs 42, p = 0.002) and numeric rating scale (NRS) neck (7.2 vs 5.8, p = 0.028) scores were higher in the PCO group before surgery. When adjusting for the use of an anterior approach, there was no significant difference in 1-year postoperative cSVA (35.7 and 35.6 cm, respectively; p = 0.969), C2-7 lordosis (13.7° and 10.1°, respectively; p = 0.393), and patient-reported outcome measures (NRS, NDI, and mJOA) between the PCO and noPCO groups. Two-year radiographic outcomes were largely similar, except for C2 slope, which was higher in the PCO group (29.1° vs 18°, p = 0.026). The overall complication rates progressively increased with more complex osteotomy use (noPCO 68.8% vs PCO 71.9% vs 3CO 75%) but did not reach significance (p = 0.063).CONCLUSIONSThe use of POs for mild flexible adult CD may not be necessary to achieve desirable radiographic correction. They are associated with greater EBL and fusion burden. Further studies are needed to fully delineate the risks of adverse events for various types of osteotomies.
目的通过后路方法矫正轻度柔性颈椎畸形(CD)时,尽管后路截骨术(POs)的必要性和风险尚不明确,但已有使用和不使用后路截骨术(POs)的描述。本研究旨在确定在矫正轻度柔性 CD 时使用后路截骨术是否会改善临床或影像学结果,并确定使用后路截骨术的相对风险。纳入标准为颈椎后凸 > 10°、颈椎侧弯 > 10°、颈椎矢状垂直轴 (cSVA) > 4 厘米或颏眉垂直角 > 25°。轻度畸形的定义是 cSVA 为 3-5 厘米和/或脊柱侧弯 < 15°。术前屈曲/伸展X光片显示C2-7角度变化大于5°,即为灵活度。将接受后柱截骨术(PCO)(艾姆斯1级和2级)的患者与未接受PCO(noPCO)的患者以及接受三柱截骨术(3CO)(艾姆斯3-6级)的患者进行比较。PCO 组患者的融合层次数(9.2 对 7.7,p = 0.001)和估计失血量(EBL)(1027 对 486 毫升,p = 0.012)均较高。无PCO组患者更有可能出现颈椎顶点后凸的情况(71.1%,p = 0.046),而接受3CO的患者更有可能出现胸椎顶点后凸的情况(58.3%,p = 0.005)。术前cSVA(PCO vs noPCO:45.4 vs 37.9 cm,p = 0.084)、T1斜度(32.5° vs 29.6°,p = 0.376)、C2-7前凸(-8.9° vs -9.2°,p = 0.942)和改良日本骨科协会(mJOA)评分(13.4 vs 13.5,p = 0.854)相似;但术前,PCO 组的颈部残疾指数(NDI)(55.6 vs 42,p = 0.002)和颈部数字评分量表(NRS)(7.2 vs 5.8,p = 0.028)评分均较高。如果对使用前路方法进行调整,PCO 组和无 PCO 组之间在术后 1 年的 cSVA(分别为 35.7 厘米和 35.6 厘米;p = 0.969)、C2-7 椎体前凸(分别为 13.7°和 10.1°;p = 0.393)以及患者报告的结果指标(NRS、NDI 和 mJOA)方面没有显著差异。两年的放射学结果大体相似,但 C2 坡度除外,PCO 组的 C2 坡度更高(29.1° vs 18°,p = 0.026)。总体并发症发生率随着截骨术的复杂程度增加而逐渐上升(无 PCO 68.8% vs PCO 71.9% vs 3CO 75%),但未达到显著性水平(p = 0.063)。结论:对于轻度柔性成人 CD,可能并不需要使用 POs 来达到理想的放射学矫正效果。需要进一步的研究来全面界定各种类型截骨术的不良事件风险。
{"title":"Necessity of posterior osteotomies for mild flexible cervical deformity correction.","authors":"Robert K Eastlack,Nikita Lakomkin,Stacie Tran,Michael Jelousi,Alex Soroceanu,Peter Passias,Themistocles Protopsaltis,Justin S Smith,Eric Klineberg,Shay Bess,Virginie Lafage,D Kojo Hamilton,Han Jo Kim,Douglas Burton,Christopher I Shaffrey,Christopher P Ames,Gregory Mundis","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.spine231223","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.5.spine231223","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVECorrection of mild flexible cervical deformity (CD) via the posterior approach has been described with and without the use of posterior osteotomies (POs), despite a lack of clarity regarding their necessity or risks. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of POs when correcting mild flexible CD leads to improved clinical or radiographic outcomes, as well as defining the relative risks in utilizing them.METHODSA prospective multicenter registry of operative CD patients was analyzed. Inclusion criteria were cervical kyphosis > 10°, cervical scoliosis > 10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°. Mild deformity was defined by a cSVA of 3-5 cm and/or kyphosis < 15°. Flexibility was defined by a C2-7 angular change > 5° on preoperative flexion/extension radiographs. Patients who received a posterior column osteotomy (PCO) (Ames grades 1 and 2) were compared with patients who did not undergo a PCO (noPCO) as well as those who underwent a three-column osteotomy (3CO) (Ames grades 3-6).RESULTSNinety-five patients (33 PCO, 49 noPCO, 13 3CO) met the inclusion criteria. Both the number of levels fused (9.2 vs 7.7, p = 0.001) and the estimated blood loss (EBL) (1027 vs 486 mL, p = 0.012) were higher in the PCO cohort. Patients in the noPCO group were more likely to have a cervical apex of kyphosis (71.1%, p = 0.046), while those undergoing 3COs were more likely to have a thoracic apex (58.3%, p = 0.005). Preoperative cSVA (PCO vs noPCO: 45.4 vs 37.9 cm, p = 0.084), T1 slope (32.5° vs 29.6°, p = 0.376), C2-7 lordosis (-8.9° vs -9.2°, p = 0.942), and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score (13.4 vs 13.5, p = 0.854) were similar; however, both Neck Disability Index (NDI) (55.6 vs 42, p = 0.002) and numeric rating scale (NRS) neck (7.2 vs 5.8, p = 0.028) scores were higher in the PCO group before surgery. When adjusting for the use of an anterior approach, there was no significant difference in 1-year postoperative cSVA (35.7 and 35.6 cm, respectively; p = 0.969), C2-7 lordosis (13.7° and 10.1°, respectively; p = 0.393), and patient-reported outcome measures (NRS, NDI, and mJOA) between the PCO and noPCO groups. Two-year radiographic outcomes were largely similar, except for C2 slope, which was higher in the PCO group (29.1° vs 18°, p = 0.026). The overall complication rates progressively increased with more complex osteotomy use (noPCO 68.8% vs PCO 71.9% vs 3CO 75%) but did not reach significance (p = 0.063).CONCLUSIONSThe use of POs for mild flexible adult CD may not be necessary to achieve desirable radiographic correction. They are associated with greater EBL and fusion burden. Further studies are needed to fully delineate the risks of adverse events for various types of osteotomies.","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142258649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-13DOI: 10.3171/2024.6.spine24126
Christine Park,Deb A Bhowmick,Christopher I Shaffrey,Erica F Bisson,Mohamad Bydon,Anthony L Asher,Domagoj Coric,Eric A Potts,Kevin T Foley,Michael Y Wang,Kai-Ming Fu,Michael S Virk,John J Knightly,Scott Meyer,Paul Park,Cheerag Upadhyaya,Mark E Shaffrey,Alexander J Schupper,Juan S Uribe,Luis M Tumialán,Jay D Turner,Andrew K Chan,Dean Chou,Regis W Haid,Praveen V Mummaneni,Oren N Gottfried
OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to compare the rate of achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and satisfaction between cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients with and without class III obesity who underwent surgery.METHODSThe authors analyzed patients from the 14 highest-enrolling sites in the prospective Quality Outcomes Database CSM cohort. Patients were dichotomized based on whether or not they were obese (class III, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2). PROs including visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA), EQ-5D, and North American Spine Society patient satisfaction scores were collected at baseline and 24 months after cervical spine surgery.RESULTSOf the 1141 patients with CSM who underwent surgery, 230 (20.2%) were obese and 911 (79.8%) were not. The 24-month follow-up rate was 87.4% for PROs. Patients who were obese were younger (58.1 ± 12.1 years vs 61.2 ± 11.6 years, p = 0.001), more frequently female (57.4% vs 44.9%, p = 0.001), and African American (22.6% vs 13.4%, p = 0.002) and had a lower education level (high school or less: 49.1% vs 40.8%, p = 0.002) and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (2.7 ± 0.5 vs 2.5 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). Clinically at baseline, the obese group had worse neck pain (VAS score: 5.7 ± 3.2 vs 5.1 ± 3.3), arm pain (VAS score: 5.4 ± 3.5 vs 4.8 ± 3.5), disability (NDI score: 42.7 ± 20.4 vs 37.4 ± 20.7), quality of life (EQ-5D score: 0.54 ± 0.22 vs 0.56 ± 0.22), and function (mJOA score: 11.6 ± 2.8 vs 12.2 ± 2.8) (all p < 0.05). At the 24-month follow-up, however, there was no difference in the change in PROs between the two groups. Even after accounting for relevant covariates, no significant difference in achievement of MCID and satisfaction was observed between the two groups at 24 months.CONCLUSIONSDespite the class III obese group having worse baseline clinical presentations, the two cohorts achieved similar rates of satisfaction and MCID in PROs. Class III obesity should not preclude and/or delay surgical management for patients who would otherwise benefit from surgery for CSM.
目的:本研究旨在比较接受手术治疗的颈椎病(CSM)患者在患者报告结果(PROs)和满意度方面的最小临床重要性差异(MCID)的达标率。方法:作者分析了前瞻性质量结果数据库CSM队列中注册人数最多的14个研究机构的患者。根据患者是否肥胖(III 级,BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2)对其进行二分。在基线和颈椎手术后24个月收集了包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)颈部和手臂疼痛、颈部残疾指数(NDI)、改良日本骨科协会(mJOA)、EQ-5D和北美脊柱协会患者满意度评分在内的PROs。24个月的随访中,PROs的随访率为87.4%。肥胖患者更年轻(58.1 ± 12.1 岁 vs 61.2 ± 11.6 岁,P = 0.001)、更多为女性(57.4% vs 44.9%,P = 0.001)、非裔美国人(22.6% vs 13.4%,P = 0.002),教育程度较低(高中或以下:49.1% vs 40.8%,P = 0.002),美国麻醉医师协会等级较高(2.7 ± 0.5 vs 2.5 ± 0.6,P < 0.001)。在临床基线上,肥胖组的颈部疼痛(VAS 评分:5.7 ± 3.2 vs 5.1 ± 3.3)、手臂疼痛(VAS 评分:5.4 ± 3.5 vs 4.8 ± 3.5)、残疾(NDI 评分:42.7 ± 20.4 vs 37.4 ± 20.7)、生活质量(EQ-5D 评分:0.54 ± 0.22 vs 0.56 ± 0.22)和功能(mJOA 评分:11.6 ± 2.8 vs 12.2 ± 2.8)(均 p < 0.05)。然而,在 24 个月的随访中,两组患者的 PROs 变化没有差异。结论尽管III级肥胖组的基线临床表现较差,但两组患者的满意度和PROs的MCID达到了相似的水平。III度肥胖不应该排除和/或延迟对CSM患者的手术治疗,否则这些患者会从手术中获益。
{"title":"Do class III obese patients achieve similar outcomes and satisfaction to nonobese patients following surgery for cervical myelopathy? A QOD study.","authors":"Christine Park,Deb A Bhowmick,Christopher I Shaffrey,Erica F Bisson,Mohamad Bydon,Anthony L Asher,Domagoj Coric,Eric A Potts,Kevin T Foley,Michael Y Wang,Kai-Ming Fu,Michael S Virk,John J Knightly,Scott Meyer,Paul Park,Cheerag Upadhyaya,Mark E Shaffrey,Alexander J Schupper,Juan S Uribe,Luis M Tumialán,Jay D Turner,Andrew K Chan,Dean Chou,Regis W Haid,Praveen V Mummaneni,Oren N Gottfried","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.spine24126","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.6.spine24126","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to compare the rate of achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and satisfaction between cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients with and without class III obesity who underwent surgery.METHODSThe authors analyzed patients from the 14 highest-enrolling sites in the prospective Quality Outcomes Database CSM cohort. Patients were dichotomized based on whether or not they were obese (class III, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2). PROs including visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA), EQ-5D, and North American Spine Society patient satisfaction scores were collected at baseline and 24 months after cervical spine surgery.RESULTSOf the 1141 patients with CSM who underwent surgery, 230 (20.2%) were obese and 911 (79.8%) were not. The 24-month follow-up rate was 87.4% for PROs. Patients who were obese were younger (58.1 ± 12.1 years vs 61.2 ± 11.6 years, p = 0.001), more frequently female (57.4% vs 44.9%, p = 0.001), and African American (22.6% vs 13.4%, p = 0.002) and had a lower education level (high school or less: 49.1% vs 40.8%, p = 0.002) and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (2.7 ± 0.5 vs 2.5 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). Clinically at baseline, the obese group had worse neck pain (VAS score: 5.7 ± 3.2 vs 5.1 ± 3.3), arm pain (VAS score: 5.4 ± 3.5 vs 4.8 ± 3.5), disability (NDI score: 42.7 ± 20.4 vs 37.4 ± 20.7), quality of life (EQ-5D score: 0.54 ± 0.22 vs 0.56 ± 0.22), and function (mJOA score: 11.6 ± 2.8 vs 12.2 ± 2.8) (all p < 0.05). At the 24-month follow-up, however, there was no difference in the change in PROs between the two groups. Even after accounting for relevant covariates, no significant difference in achievement of MCID and satisfaction was observed between the two groups at 24 months.CONCLUSIONSDespite the class III obese group having worse baseline clinical presentations, the two cohorts achieved similar rates of satisfaction and MCID in PROs. Class III obesity should not preclude and/or delay surgical management for patients who would otherwise benefit from surgery for CSM.","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142258612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}