Pub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.07.021
Tatsuhiko Nanri MD, Mana Kaida MD, Daisuke Koga MD, PhD, Kota Minami MD
{"title":"Comment on “Deep Continuous Sedation Until Death, Experience of Relatives and Healthcare Providers”","authors":"Tatsuhiko Nanri MD, Mana Kaida MD, Daisuke Koga MD, PhD, Kota Minami MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.07.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.07.021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"71 1","pages":"Pages e95-e96"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145705354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.10.004
Mellar P. Davis MD, FCCP, FAAHPM
{"title":"IPOS, Dyspnea and Minimal Clinically Important Differences: Reinterpretation and Perspective","authors":"Mellar P. Davis MD, FCCP, FAAHPM","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.10.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.10.004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"71 1","pages":"Pages e109-e110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145705175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.12.001
Eran Ben-Arye, Jan Vagedes, Sameer Kassem, Noah Samuels, Ofer Lavie, Vika Zaritsky, Orit Gressel
Context and objectives: Patients with cancer living in war zones face significant quality of life (QoL)-related challenges. This study examined an integrative oncology (IO) intervention in northern Israel for pain and autonomic response.
Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled and pragmatic study examined an IO intervention with manual-relaxation, with acupuncture (Group A) or without (Group B). ESAS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale), EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire), and MYCAW (Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing) tools were used to examine QoL. Heart rate and variability (HRV) were measured at baseline and 15 minutes post-treatment, comparing frequency-domain variable changes (e.g., LN Power Total, Power HF, Power LF, Power VLF).
Results: Of 125 patients, Groups A (67) and B (58) had similar demographic and cancer-related characteristics. ESAS pain scores improved in both groups post-treatment (A, P<0.001; B, P=0.002), as did anxiety, depression, and fatigue. At three weeks, Group B reported greater improvement on ESAS pain (p=0.039) and MYCAW pain-related concerns (p=0.025), both showing within-group improvement on EORTC pain. HRV showed greater change in Group A, with decreased LN Power Total (p=0.006), LN Power LF (p=0.02), and LN Power VLF (p=0.026). While Relative Power HF increased marginally (p=0.054), heart rate decreasing more significantly in Group B (p=0.005).
Conclusions: IO treatments led to reduced pain among patients with cancer living in a war zone, with no additive effect of acupuncture. HRV changes suggest enhanced parasympathetic activity, with acupuncture-treated patients showing additional frequency-domain changes attributed to decreased sympathetic tone.
{"title":"Adding acupuncture to touch/relaxation for pain in wartime: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Eran Ben-Arye, Jan Vagedes, Sameer Kassem, Noah Samuels, Ofer Lavie, Vika Zaritsky, Orit Gressel","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.12.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.12.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context and objectives: </strong>Patients with cancer living in war zones face significant quality of life (QoL)-related challenges. This study examined an integrative oncology (IO) intervention in northern Israel for pain and autonomic response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, controlled and pragmatic study examined an IO intervention with manual-relaxation, with acupuncture (Group A) or without (Group B). ESAS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale), EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire), and MYCAW (Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing) tools were used to examine QoL. Heart rate and variability (HRV) were measured at baseline and 15 minutes post-treatment, comparing frequency-domain variable changes (e.g., LN Power Total, Power HF, Power LF, Power VLF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 125 patients, Groups A (67) and B (58) had similar demographic and cancer-related characteristics. ESAS pain scores improved in both groups post-treatment (A, P<0.001; B, P=0.002), as did anxiety, depression, and fatigue. At three weeks, Group B reported greater improvement on ESAS pain (p=0.039) and MYCAW pain-related concerns (p=0.025), both showing within-group improvement on EORTC pain. HRV showed greater change in Group A, with decreased LN Power Total (p=0.006), LN Power LF (p=0.02), and LN Power VLF (p=0.026). While Relative Power HF increased marginally (p=0.054), heart rate decreasing more significantly in Group B (p=0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IO treatments led to reduced pain among patients with cancer living in a war zone, with no additive effect of acupuncture. HRV changes suggest enhanced parasympathetic activity, with acupuncture-treated patients showing additional frequency-domain changes attributed to decreased sympathetic tone.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145743143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.023
Todd D Becker, Karla T Washington, Elissa Kozlov, Denae J Gerasta, Grant Yoder, Daniel D Matlock, Stacy M Fischer, Sara Sanders
Context: Although hospice policies vary in where they permit staff to be physically located during key stages of the medical aid in dying (MAID) procedure, data needed to inform best practices concerning if and how clinicians themselves are present are lacking.
Objectives: To (1) assess the sample proportion of clinician presence during each individual stage of the MAID procedure and (2) typologize the distinct trajectories of clinician presence across stages of the MAID procedure.
Methods: We used secondary cross-sectional survey data from a convenience sample of interdisciplinary US hospice clinicians indicating permissive state and organizational MAID participation policies. Participants reported whether they had ever been present during medication self-administration, after medication self-administration, and after death by indicating if they had been in the same room, in the same residence but not the same room, or never present. We assessed presence and typologized trajectories via frequency and percentage.
Results: The sample comprised 106 hospice physicians, nurses, social workers, and chaplains. The sample majority reported never having been present during any stage. Across stages, the sample demonstrated 13 distinct trajectories of clinician presence. The most common trajectories illustrated uniformity in physical location across stages. The remaining trajectories reflected transitions in physical locations across stages. Transition subgroups depicted increasing proximity to bedside, increasing distance from bedside, and a combination of both.
Conclusions: High variability in hospice clinician presence throughout the MAID procedure may differentially affect patient care. Future best-practices research should explore stakeholder experiences of trajectories and stratify trajectories by professional discipline.
{"title":"Interdisciplinary US Hospice Clinician Presence Throughout the Medical Aid in Dying Procedure.","authors":"Todd D Becker, Karla T Washington, Elissa Kozlov, Denae J Gerasta, Grant Yoder, Daniel D Matlock, Stacy M Fischer, Sara Sanders","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Although hospice policies vary in where they permit staff to be physically located during key stages of the medical aid in dying (MAID) procedure, data needed to inform best practices concerning if and how clinicians themselves are present are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To (1) assess the sample proportion of clinician presence during each individual stage of the MAID procedure and (2) typologize the distinct trajectories of clinician presence across stages of the MAID procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used secondary cross-sectional survey data from a convenience sample of interdisciplinary US hospice clinicians indicating permissive state and organizational MAID participation policies. Participants reported whether they had ever been present during medication self-administration, after medication self-administration, and after death by indicating if they had been in the same room, in the same residence but not the same room, or never present. We assessed presence and typologized trajectories via frequency and percentage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 106 hospice physicians, nurses, social workers, and chaplains. The sample majority reported never having been present during any stage. Across stages, the sample demonstrated 13 distinct trajectories of clinician presence. The most common trajectories illustrated uniformity in physical location across stages. The remaining trajectories reflected transitions in physical locations across stages. Transition subgroups depicted increasing proximity to bedside, increasing distance from bedside, and a combination of both.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High variability in hospice clinician presence throughout the MAID procedure may differentially affect patient care. Future best-practices research should explore stakeholder experiences of trajectories and stratify trajectories by professional discipline.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.029
Miharu Nakanishi, Taeko Nakashima, Yuki Miyamoto, Syudo Yamasaki, Atsushi Nishida, Annicka van der Plas, Nienke Fleuren, Almar Kok, Martijn Huisman, Jenny T van der Steen
Context: Advance care planning (ACP) may prepare older adults for future health problems including cognitive and physical decline. Depressive symptoms are observed among those engaging in ACP. However, the directionality of the association between ACP engagement and depressive symptoms remains uncertain.
Objectives: To investigate bidirectional associations between engaging in ACP and depressive symptoms in older adults at a within-person level after accounting for cognitive and physical decline.
Methods: A longitudinal study design using random intercept cross-lagged panel models. Community-dwelling older adults from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam with 3 assessments at T0 (2015-2016), T1 (2018-2019), and T2 (2021-2022). Discussion of end-of-life wishes with a physician was used as a proxy measure for ACP engagement.
Results: Participants included 1669 older adults (mean [SD] age, 69.7 [7.7] years at T0; 923 [55.3%] were women). Poor cognition at T0 was associated with having discussed end-of-life wishes at T1 (β = -0.12 [95%CI, -0.23 to -0.01]), that was prospectively associated with increased depressive symptoms (0.12 [0.01 to 0.24]), decreased cognition (-0.13 [-0.22 to -0.04]), and decreased physical performance (-0.16 [-0.27 to -0.04]) at T2.
Conclusion: Older adults appear at risk for having depressive symptoms following discussing end-of-life wishes with their physicians. End-of-life communication may reflect an ongoing trajectory of cognitive decline which could result in further functional decline and increased depressive symptoms. A better understanding of how and which elements of end-of-life discussions are associated with the mood of older adults will provide implications for the implementation of ACP.
{"title":"Bidirectional Associations Between End-of-Life Communication and Depressive Symptoms in Older Adults.","authors":"Miharu Nakanishi, Taeko Nakashima, Yuki Miyamoto, Syudo Yamasaki, Atsushi Nishida, Annicka van der Plas, Nienke Fleuren, Almar Kok, Martijn Huisman, Jenny T van der Steen","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Advance care planning (ACP) may prepare older adults for future health problems including cognitive and physical decline. Depressive symptoms are observed among those engaging in ACP. However, the directionality of the association between ACP engagement and depressive symptoms remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate bidirectional associations between engaging in ACP and depressive symptoms in older adults at a within-person level after accounting for cognitive and physical decline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal study design using random intercept cross-lagged panel models. Community-dwelling older adults from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam with 3 assessments at T0 (2015-2016), T1 (2018-2019), and T2 (2021-2022). Discussion of end-of-life wishes with a physician was used as a proxy measure for ACP engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included 1669 older adults (mean [SD] age, 69.7 [7.7] years at T0; 923 [55.3%] were women). Poor cognition at T0 was associated with having discussed end-of-life wishes at T1 (β = -0.12 [95%CI, -0.23 to -0.01]), that was prospectively associated with increased depressive symptoms (0.12 [0.01 to 0.24]), decreased cognition (-0.13 [-0.22 to -0.04]), and decreased physical performance (-0.16 [-0.27 to -0.04]) at T2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older adults appear at risk for having depressive symptoms following discussing end-of-life wishes with their physicians. End-of-life communication may reflect an ongoing trajectory of cognitive decline which could result in further functional decline and increased depressive symptoms. A better understanding of how and which elements of end-of-life discussions are associated with the mood of older adults will provide implications for the implementation of ACP.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Context: . Breathlessness is the most common and distressing symptom in lung cancer, but no systematic review has examined the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions on breathlessness.
Objectives: . To evaluate the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions on breathlessness, pulmonary function, and psychological well-being in lung cancer.
Methods: . According to the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic search across ten databases from inception to February 2025. Only randomized controlled trials were included.
Results: Fourteen RCTs from 15 papers (N=1190) were included. Pooled results: compared with a control, mindfulness-based interventions did not show a significant improvement in breathlessness [SMD=-0.44, 95%CI:-0.92 - 0.05, n=5]; indicated a significant improvement in pulmonary function including vital capacity [MD=0.44 L, 95%CI:0.18 - 0.70, n=2], peak expiratory flow [MD=14.72 L/s, 95%CI:6.14 - 23.30, n=2], forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) [MD=0.49 L, 95%CI:0.17 - 0.81, n=9], forced vital capacity (FVC) [MD=0.55 L, 95%CI:0.28 - 0.83, n=8], FEV1/FVC [MD=8.02%, 95%CI:5.77 - 10.28, n=6]; indicated a significant reduction in psychological distress including depressive symptoms [SMD=-1.28, 95%CI:-2.25 - -0.31, n=6], and anxiety [SMD=-1.54, 95%CI:-2.34 - -0.74, n=7]. Subgroup analysis: patients receiving mindfulness-based respiratory function interventions indicated significant improvements in breathlessness [SMD=-0.53, 95%CI:-0.86 - -0.21], FEV1 [MD=0.28 L, 95%CI:0.17 - 0.39], and FVC [MD=1.29, 95%CI: 0.64 - 1.95], compared with those receiving respiratory function intervention.
Conclusion: . Mindfulness-based interventions did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in self-reported breathlessness compared to controls. However, subgroup analysis indicated that combining mindfulness with respiratory function training may offer additional benefits for alleviating breathlessness. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to determine the optimal intervention dosages and long-term impact of mindfulness-based interventions on improving breathlessness.
{"title":"Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Breathlessness in Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yueying Wang, Yan Li, Yule Hu, Hayley Lewthwaite, Bingqian Zhu, Kuan Liao, Mengqi Li, Yushen Dai, Naomi Takemura, Vanessa Marie McDonald, Janelle Yorke","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>. Breathlessness is the most common and distressing symptom in lung cancer, but no systematic review has examined the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions on breathlessness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>. To evaluate the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions on breathlessness, pulmonary function, and psychological well-being in lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>. According to the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic search across ten databases from inception to February 2025. Only randomized controlled trials were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen RCTs from 15 papers (N=1190) were included. Pooled results: compared with a control, mindfulness-based interventions did not show a significant improvement in breathlessness [SMD=-0.44, 95%CI:-0.92 - 0.05, n=5]; indicated a significant improvement in pulmonary function including vital capacity [MD=0.44 L, 95%CI:0.18 - 0.70, n=2], peak expiratory flow [MD=14.72 L/s, 95%CI:6.14 - 23.30, n=2], forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV<sub>1</sub>) [MD=0.49 L, 95%CI:0.17 - 0.81, n=9], forced vital capacity (FVC) [MD=0.55 L, 95%CI:0.28 - 0.83, n=8], FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC [MD=8.02%, 95%CI:5.77 - 10.28, n=6]; indicated a significant reduction in psychological distress including depressive symptoms [SMD=-1.28, 95%CI:-2.25 - -0.31, n=6], and anxiety [SMD=-1.54, 95%CI:-2.34 - -0.74, n=7]. Subgroup analysis: patients receiving mindfulness-based respiratory function interventions indicated significant improvements in breathlessness [SMD=-0.53, 95%CI:-0.86 - -0.21], FEV<sub>1</sub> [MD=0.28 L, 95%CI:0.17 - 0.39], and FVC [MD=1.29, 95%CI: 0.64 - 1.95], compared with those receiving respiratory function intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>. Mindfulness-based interventions did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in self-reported breathlessness compared to controls. However, subgroup analysis indicated that combining mindfulness with respiratory function training may offer additional benefits for alleviating breathlessness. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to determine the optimal intervention dosages and long-term impact of mindfulness-based interventions on improving breathlessness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145677881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-28DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.022
Kathleen T Unroe, Mary Ersek, Timothy E Stump, Alexander Floyd, Matthew Nesvet, Lieve Van den Block, Wanzhu Tu, John G Cagle
Context: Evaluation of palliative care programs in nursing homes often includes symptom assessments. For residents with cognitive impairment, proxy symptom reports, such as those from family members or nursing home staff, may be used as outcome measures.
Objectives: This analysis compares differences between family and staff proxy reports of symptoms of nursing home residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment.
Methods: Data were collected as part of a clinical trial, conducted in 16 nursing homes (NHs) in Indiana and Maryland (U.S.). We calculated the difference in total modified End-of-Life Dementia Comfort Assessment in Dying (EOLD-CAD) scores between family and staff respondents for 194 residents, and quantified characteristics associated with discordance.
Results: About half of responding staff were licensed nurses and 37% were certified nursing assistants. Adult children of residents were the most common (57%) family respondents. There was fair agreement between the respondent groups (kappa = 0.26) for the total modified EOLD-CAD scale. Overall, family members reported higher symptom burden than staff. Some symptoms, including discomfort, pain, restlessness and agitation, were reported as more burdensome by both groups of proxies vs. symptoms such as gurgling or choking. Proxy symptom reports on residents with more advanced cognitive impairment were less likely to be substantially discordant (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.26, 0.99, P = 0.047).
Conclusion: Proxies are often used to report symptom experiences for people living with cognitive impairment. Multiple perspectives may be needed to obtain a fuller picture of symptom burden in this population.
{"title":"Discordance in Ratings of Symptoms Experienced by Nursing Home Residents With Cognitive Impairment.","authors":"Kathleen T Unroe, Mary Ersek, Timothy E Stump, Alexander Floyd, Matthew Nesvet, Lieve Van den Block, Wanzhu Tu, John G Cagle","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.022","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Evaluation of palliative care programs in nursing homes often includes symptom assessments. For residents with cognitive impairment, proxy symptom reports, such as those from family members or nursing home staff, may be used as outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This analysis compares differences between family and staff proxy reports of symptoms of nursing home residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected as part of a clinical trial, conducted in 16 nursing homes (NHs) in Indiana and Maryland (U.S.). We calculated the difference in total modified End-of-Life Dementia Comfort Assessment in Dying (EOLD-CAD) scores between family and staff respondents for 194 residents, and quantified characteristics associated with discordance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About half of responding staff were licensed nurses and 37% were certified nursing assistants. Adult children of residents were the most common (57%) family respondents. There was fair agreement between the respondent groups (kappa = 0.26) for the total modified EOLD-CAD scale. Overall, family members reported higher symptom burden than staff. Some symptoms, including discomfort, pain, restlessness and agitation, were reported as more burdensome by both groups of proxies vs. symptoms such as gurgling or choking. Proxy symptom reports on residents with more advanced cognitive impairment were less likely to be substantially discordant (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.26, 0.99, P = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Proxies are often used to report symptom experiences for people living with cognitive impairment. Multiple perspectives may be needed to obtain a fuller picture of symptom burden in this population.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT04520698.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145648852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-28DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.027
Shrikant Atreya, Mebin Mathew, Vijay Shree Dhyani, Arun Ghoshal, Arathi Rao, Seema Rao, Srinagesh Simha, William E Rosa, Catherine Walshe, Nancy Preston, Richard Sullivan, Gary Rodin, Naveen Salins
Background: In low- and middle-income countries, the incidence of cancer is rising, with diagnoses frequently made at advanced stages, limited access to treatments, and high mortality rates. Palliative care may alleviate suffering, enhance quality of life, and reduce costs. In this review, we aimed to explore the development of palliative care in low- and middle-income settings and assess if and how this contributes to mitigating or alleviating the human suffering of people with cancer.
Methods: A best-fit framework synthesis approach was employed, and seven databases were systematically searched in 2025. Data from eligible studies were extracted and qualitatively synthesized into themes and subthemes, initially using a framework constructed from indicators from the WHO Conceptual Model for Palliative Care Development and the Integrated Palliative Care Oncology Practice Model. The review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024511158) FINDINGS: Studies (n = 81) were reviewed. Interventions by multidisciplinary teams, combined with a bio-psycho-socio-spiritual approach, led to improved patient outcomes. Palliative care reduced hospital stays, decreased unnecessary end-of-life treatments, and facilitated home deaths. Community-based palliative care empowered patients and families to manage care at home, cope with uncertainties, and lower healthcare costs. Successful implementation relied on a participatory public health system and support from nongovernmental organizations, which provided access to palliative care, telehealth, and training for primary care providers. However, when compared to the indicators from the two models, only a few aligned with core elements.
Interpretation: Although progress has been made in integrating palliative care in low- and middle-income countries, evidence linking this development to international indicators of palliative care progress is insufficient. It is likely that strengthening patient-family partnerships, promoting shared decision-making, and advocating for patient rights contribute to alleviating the human suffering from cancer.
Funding: The conduct of this review is supported by an unrestricted grant from the End-of-Life Care in India Task Force (ELICIT). ELICIT supports end-of-life education, research, and policy.
{"title":"Palliative Care in Low and Middle-Income Countries to Reduce Cancer Suffering: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Shrikant Atreya, Mebin Mathew, Vijay Shree Dhyani, Arun Ghoshal, Arathi Rao, Seema Rao, Srinagesh Simha, William E Rosa, Catherine Walshe, Nancy Preston, Richard Sullivan, Gary Rodin, Naveen Salins","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.027","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In low- and middle-income countries, the incidence of cancer is rising, with diagnoses frequently made at advanced stages, limited access to treatments, and high mortality rates. Palliative care may alleviate suffering, enhance quality of life, and reduce costs. In this review, we aimed to explore the development of palliative care in low- and middle-income settings and assess if and how this contributes to mitigating or alleviating the human suffering of people with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A best-fit framework synthesis approach was employed, and seven databases were systematically searched in 2025. Data from eligible studies were extracted and qualitatively synthesized into themes and subthemes, initially using a framework constructed from indicators from the WHO Conceptual Model for Palliative Care Development and the Integrated Palliative Care Oncology Practice Model. The review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024511158) FINDINGS: Studies (n = 81) were reviewed. Interventions by multidisciplinary teams, combined with a bio-psycho-socio-spiritual approach, led to improved patient outcomes. Palliative care reduced hospital stays, decreased unnecessary end-of-life treatments, and facilitated home deaths. Community-based palliative care empowered patients and families to manage care at home, cope with uncertainties, and lower healthcare costs. Successful implementation relied on a participatory public health system and support from nongovernmental organizations, which provided access to palliative care, telehealth, and training for primary care providers. However, when compared to the indicators from the two models, only a few aligned with core elements.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Although progress has been made in integrating palliative care in low- and middle-income countries, evidence linking this development to international indicators of palliative care progress is insufficient. It is likely that strengthening patient-family partnerships, promoting shared decision-making, and advocating for patient rights contribute to alleviating the human suffering from cancer.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The conduct of this review is supported by an unrestricted grant from the End-of-Life Care in India Task Force (ELICIT). ELICIT supports end-of-life education, research, and policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145648844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-28DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.024
Wang Ruixin, Zhou Xuan, Cai Siyu, Chenchen Sun, Ximena Garcia-Quintero, Zhang Anan, He Xiangling, Zhao Weihong, Huang Jie, Zheng Hao, Godwin Job, Meenakshi Devidas, Zhang Weiwei, Wang Xianjing, Zhao Ping, Yao Yanhua, Justin N Baker, Michael J McNeil
Context: Pediatric palliative care (PPC) for children with cancer can improve the quality of life for patients and their families, but barriers impede the early integration of PPC for many patients.
Objectives: This study aims to investigate the current status of PPC integration for children with cancer in China, identify discrepancies between the ideal and actual timing of PPC implementation, and highlight physician-perceived barriers to PPC integration.
Methods: The assessing doctors' attitudes on palliative treatment (ADAPT) survey was recently translated into Chinese and thoroughly validated. The survey was distributed to physicians caring for children with cancer across 25 Chinese provinces. The response rate was 98.4%. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings. A qualitative analysis was used for open-ended responses.
Results: Data from 368 physician responses were included in the final analysis. Most participants (83.2%) stated that the actual timing of PPC consultation for children with cancer in their center occurs at the end of life. Most participants (70.4%) also stated that PPC consultation should ideally occur at diagnosis, but only 121 (32.9%) reported this happening in their current practice (P < 0.001). The most frequently identified barriers included limited access to palliative care specialists or services (79.9%), lack of palliative care positions in tertiary hospitals (75.5%), and lack of home-based services (73.4%).
Conclusion: This study reveals a significant gap between the ideal and actual timing of PPC consultations, with most consultations occurring at the end of life or when curative options are exhausted rather than early after diagnosis. The findings also highlight the perceived barriers of limited access to specialists and home-based services, providing a focus for further intervention and capacity enhancement within China.
{"title":"Ideal Timing and Perceived Barriers for Palliative Care Integration for Children with Cancer in China.","authors":"Wang Ruixin, Zhou Xuan, Cai Siyu, Chenchen Sun, Ximena Garcia-Quintero, Zhang Anan, He Xiangling, Zhao Weihong, Huang Jie, Zheng Hao, Godwin Job, Meenakshi Devidas, Zhang Weiwei, Wang Xianjing, Zhao Ping, Yao Yanhua, Justin N Baker, Michael J McNeil","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.024","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Pediatric palliative care (PPC) for children with cancer can improve the quality of life for patients and their families, but barriers impede the early integration of PPC for many patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate the current status of PPC integration for children with cancer in China, identify discrepancies between the ideal and actual timing of PPC implementation, and highlight physician-perceived barriers to PPC integration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The assessing doctors' attitudes on palliative treatment (ADAPT) survey was recently translated into Chinese and thoroughly validated. The survey was distributed to physicians caring for children with cancer across 25 Chinese provinces. The response rate was 98.4%. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings. A qualitative analysis was used for open-ended responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 368 physician responses were included in the final analysis. Most participants (83.2%) stated that the actual timing of PPC consultation for children with cancer in their center occurs at the end of life. Most participants (70.4%) also stated that PPC consultation should ideally occur at diagnosis, but only 121 (32.9%) reported this happening in their current practice (P < 0.001). The most frequently identified barriers included limited access to palliative care specialists or services (79.9%), lack of palliative care positions in tertiary hospitals (75.5%), and lack of home-based services (73.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reveals a significant gap between the ideal and actual timing of PPC consultations, with most consultations occurring at the end of life or when curative options are exhausted rather than early after diagnosis. The findings also highlight the perceived barriers of limited access to specialists and home-based services, providing a focus for further intervention and capacity enhancement within China.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145648847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-28DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.025
Inge Dufva, Gitte Juhl, Fahimeh Andersen, Randi Beier-Holgersen, Matthew Maddocks
Context: Patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis and often high health care requirements.
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of early specialized palliative care for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer on hospital use.
Methods: Using a quasi-experimental design, newly diagnosed patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer diagnosed from October 2019 to February 2021 were offered specialized palliative care delivered as home-visits (n = 65). The retrospective control cohort were similar patients diagnosed between December 2017 and April 2019 (n = 60). The primary endpoint was use of hospital care. Secondary outcomes included survival, quality of life and place of death.
Results: Median overall survival was significantly longer in the intervention cohort compared with the control cohort, 8.0 months (95% CI, 5.9-10.0) vs 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.5-6.3) (P = 0.029). There was no difference in use of hospital care between the cohorts, but given the longer survival in the intervention cohort there were significant reductions in monthly hospital admissions, 0.8 vs 1.2 (P = 0.002), emergency department admissions, 0.4 vs 0.6 (P = 0.009) and days in hospital, 4.2 vs 7.2 (P = 0.001) in the intervention cohort compared with the control cohort. The proportion of patients who died in hospital outside the palliative care unit was significantly lower in the intervention cohort compared with the control cohort, 14.5% vs 30.5% (P = 0.035).
Conclusion: Early specialized palliative care for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer resulted in an increase in survival without an increase in use of hospital care.
背景:不可切除的胰腺癌患者预后差,往往有很高的医疗保健要求。目的:评价不可切除胰腺癌患者早期专科姑息治疗对住院治疗的影响。方法:采用准实验设计,对2019年10月至2021年2月诊断为不可切除胰腺癌的新诊断患者(n=65)进行专业姑息治疗家访。回顾性对照队列为2017年12月至2019年4月诊断的类似患者(n=60)。主要终点是医院护理的使用。次要结局包括生存、生活质量和死亡地点。结果:干预组的中位总生存期明显长于对照组,为8.0个月(95% CI, 5.9-10.0) vs 4.9个月(95% CI, 3.5-6.3) (P = 0.029)。两组在医院护理的使用方面没有差异,但考虑到干预组的生存期较长,与对照组相比,干预组每月住院次数显著减少,分别为0.8 vs 1.2 (P = 0.002),急诊住院次数为0.4 vs 0.6 (P = 0.009),住院天数为4.2 vs 7.2 (P = 0.001)。干预组患者在姑息治疗病房外死亡的比例显著低于对照组,分别为14.5%和30.5% (P = 0.035)。结论:对不能切除的胰腺癌患者进行早期专科姑息治疗可提高生存率,但不增加住院治疗的使用。
{"title":"Early Specialized Palliative Care for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Inge Dufva, Gitte Juhl, Fahimeh Andersen, Randi Beier-Holgersen, Matthew Maddocks","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.025","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.11.025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis and often high health care requirements.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of early specialized palliative care for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer on hospital use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a quasi-experimental design, newly diagnosed patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer diagnosed from October 2019 to February 2021 were offered specialized palliative care delivered as home-visits (n = 65). The retrospective control cohort were similar patients diagnosed between December 2017 and April 2019 (n = 60). The primary endpoint was use of hospital care. Secondary outcomes included survival, quality of life and place of death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median overall survival was significantly longer in the intervention cohort compared with the control cohort, 8.0 months (95% CI, 5.9-10.0) vs 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.5-6.3) (P = 0.029). There was no difference in use of hospital care between the cohorts, but given the longer survival in the intervention cohort there were significant reductions in monthly hospital admissions, 0.8 vs 1.2 (P = 0.002), emergency department admissions, 0.4 vs 0.6 (P = 0.009) and days in hospital, 4.2 vs 7.2 (P = 0.001) in the intervention cohort compared with the control cohort. The proportion of patients who died in hospital outside the palliative care unit was significantly lower in the intervention cohort compared with the control cohort, 14.5% vs 30.5% (P = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early specialized palliative care for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer resulted in an increase in survival without an increase in use of hospital care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145648874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}