Pub Date : 2024-10-04DOI: 10.1177/10781552241288475
Ruba Alchaikh Hassan, Shiva Salmasi, Zahra Ghafarzadeh, Constantin A Dasanu
Introduction: 5-azacitidine is a hypomethylating agent (HMA) used for treating myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and certain myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Common side effects include myelosuppression, nausea and injection site reactions. Serious allergic reactions are rare with this class of agents.
Case report: We describe a 71-year-old man with MDS/MPN who developed repeated episodes of angioedema after starting treatment with subcutaneous 5-azacitidine. Angioedema involved multiple body areas including the neck, genitalia, lower back and gastrointestinal system. Causality assessment linked this entity to 5-azacitidine via the Naranjo nomogram questionnaire, by scoring 9.
Management and outcome: 5-azacitidine was discontinued due to recurrent episodes of angioedema that occurred even after dose reduction. Steroids were helpful in terms of reversing this reaction. Afterwards, no further episodes of angioedema have been documented. The patient's thrombocytosis is currently well-controlled with low dose hydroxyurea.
Discussion/conclusion: We report herein a unique case of recurrent, multisystem angioedema likely related to 5-azacitidine. The exact mechanism of azacitidine-induced angioedema is not currently known. Symptoms, clinical findings and timing of presentation are not always clear-cut, and it may take more than one cycle of 5-azacitidine before the diagnosis is made. Supportive and symptomatic treatment will be provided based on the severity of the reaction. Future studies may offer more insights into the mechanism underlying this rare and serious, yet intriguing side effect.
{"title":"Recurrent, multisystem angioedema induced by 5-azacitidine.","authors":"Ruba Alchaikh Hassan, Shiva Salmasi, Zahra Ghafarzadeh, Constantin A Dasanu","doi":"10.1177/10781552241288475","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241288475","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>5-azacitidine is a hypomethylating agent (HMA) used for treating myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and certain myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Common side effects include myelosuppression, nausea and injection site reactions. Serious allergic reactions are rare with this class of agents.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>We describe a 71-year-old man with MDS/MPN who developed repeated episodes of angioedema after starting treatment with subcutaneous 5-azacitidine. Angioedema involved multiple body areas including the neck, genitalia, lower back and gastrointestinal system. Causality assessment linked this entity to 5-azacitidine via the Naranjo nomogram questionnaire, by scoring 9.</p><p><strong>Management and outcome: </strong>5-azacitidine was discontinued due to recurrent episodes of angioedema that occurred even after dose reduction. Steroids were helpful in terms of reversing this reaction. Afterwards, no further episodes of angioedema have been documented. The patient's thrombocytosis is currently well-controlled with low dose hydroxyurea.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>We report herein a unique case of recurrent, multisystem angioedema likely related to 5-azacitidine. The exact mechanism of azacitidine-induced angioedema is not currently known. Symptoms, clinical findings and timing of presentation are not always clear-cut, and it may take more than one cycle of 5-azacitidine before the diagnosis is made. Supportive and symptomatic treatment will be provided based on the severity of the reaction. Future studies may offer more insights into the mechanism underlying this rare and serious, yet intriguing side effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552241288475"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-03DOI: 10.1177/10781552241288143
Araceli Iglesias-Santamaría
Introduction: To minimize the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) caused by paclitaxel infusion, premedication with corticosteroid, H1-antagonist and H2 antagonist (ranitidine) was standard of care. Discontinuation of ranitidine in 2020 led to adjustments in premedication regimens and a new regimen without ranitidine was implemented in our center. This study aimed to compare the incidence of HSRs during paclitaxel treatment of a standard premedication regimen including ranitidine with a new premedication regimen without ranitidine and with a titrated infusion rate during the first two administrations.
Methods: Retrospective data analysis was performed on two cohorts of adult patients with solid tumors who started treatment with paclitaxel and received a premedication regimen with and without ranitidine over the years 2021 and 2023 respectively (before and after ranitidine withdrawal). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate any associations with H2 antagonist treatment adjusting for confounding variables.
Results: A total of 319 patients were included. 158 patients received the standard premedication regimen with ranitidine compared to 161 patients who did not received ranitidine. HSRs were observed in 10 of 1101 administrations of paclitaxel (0,90%) in ranitidine group compared to 2 of 899 (0,22%) in the ranitidine-free cohort (p = 0.048). Analysis incidence per patient also found results with statistically significant differences: 5.7% (9 of 158 patients) in the ranitidine cohort compared to 1.2% (2 of 161 patients) in the ranitidine-free cohort (p = 0.029).
Conclusions: The results of the study show the effectiveness of a premedication regimen including only dexchlorpherinamine and dexamethasone, along with a titrated infusion rate during the first two administrations, in reducing the incidence of paclitaxed-induced HSRs.
{"title":"Exclusion of ranitidine from premedication regimen during paclitaxel treatment: A retrospective single-center analysis.","authors":"Araceli Iglesias-Santamaría","doi":"10.1177/10781552241288143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241288143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To minimize the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) caused by paclitaxel infusion, premedication with corticosteroid, H1-antagonist and H2 antagonist (ranitidine) was standard of care. Discontinuation of ranitidine in 2020 led to adjustments in premedication regimens and a new regimen without ranitidine was implemented in our center. This study aimed to compare the incidence of HSRs during paclitaxel treatment of a standard premedication regimen including ranitidine with a new premedication regimen without ranitidine and with a titrated infusion rate during the first two administrations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data analysis was performed on two cohorts of adult patients with solid tumors who started treatment with paclitaxel and received a premedication regimen with and without ranitidine over the years 2021 and 2023 respectively (before and after ranitidine withdrawal). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate any associations with H2 antagonist treatment adjusting for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 319 patients were included. 158 patients received the standard premedication regimen with ranitidine compared to 161 patients who did not received ranitidine. HSRs were observed in 10 of 1101 administrations of paclitaxel (0,90%) in ranitidine group compared to 2 of 899 (0,22%) in the ranitidine-free cohort (p = 0.048). Analysis incidence per patient also found results with statistically significant differences: 5.7% (9 of 158 patients) in the ranitidine cohort compared to 1.2% (2 of 161 patients) in the ranitidine-free cohort (p = 0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the study show the effectiveness of a premedication regimen including only dexchlorpherinamine and dexamethasone, along with a titrated infusion rate during the first two administrations, in reducing the incidence of paclitaxed-induced HSRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552241288143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142365567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-03DOI: 10.1177/10781552241275948
Hina Raza, Mariyam Javaid, Wajiha Rehman, Sana Rafiq, Zermina Rashid, Rahat Shamim, Abdolelah Jaradat, Mohamed Deifallah Yousif
Introduction: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a chemotherapeutic agent used to treat various types of cancers. Although widely used, it has consistently been attributed to cardiotoxicities after administration. The purpose of this study was to assess the parameters and predictors of cardiotoxicities associated with various 5-FU-based chemotherapeutic protocols in patients with GI/colorectal cancer, as well as the correlation of these cardiotoxic events with age, sex, cumulative dose, and risk factors such as obesity, hypertension, and family history of cardiac diseases.
Methods: A prospective study consisting of 396 patients of both sexes was conducted in the oncology ward of Nishtar Hospital in Multan, Pakistan. Patients were grouped according to the therapeutic protocol they received (5-FU monotherapy or in combination, with different dosing regimens). Electrocardiography and serum troponin levels were used to assess 5-FU-induced cardiotoxicity. In cases where cardiotoxicity was detected, 5-FU treatment was interrupted; nitroglycerin, nitrates, and calcium channel blockers were administered; and cardiac monitoring was initiated. 5-FU was discontinued in all cases of acute myocardial infarction.
Results: Of the 396 patients, 28.5% reported different cardiotoxic symptoms after receiving various 5-FU-containing protocols. 35% had anginal pain, 13% suffered a myocardial infarction, 11% developed hypertension, and 10% presented heart failure. Patients receiving 5-FU combination therapy showed cardiotoxic events that were significantly different from those on 5-FU monotherapy. Based on the ECG results, only the QTc-d interval increased significantly (p < 0.001) after therapy. 68% of the patients had troponin levels > 2 ng/mL at the end of treatment.
Conclusions: Pre-existing cardiac diseases, treatment duration, smoking, and obesity were found to be influential components in the development of cardiotoxicity, and patients with cancer should be closely monitored during 5-FU chemotherapy.
{"title":"Investigation of 5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity in combinational therapy: Influence of risk factors and demographics in a Pakistani population.","authors":"Hina Raza, Mariyam Javaid, Wajiha Rehman, Sana Rafiq, Zermina Rashid, Rahat Shamim, Abdolelah Jaradat, Mohamed Deifallah Yousif","doi":"10.1177/10781552241275948","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241275948","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a chemotherapeutic agent used to treat various types of cancers. Although widely used, it has consistently been attributed to cardiotoxicities after administration. The purpose of this study was to assess the parameters and predictors of cardiotoxicities associated with various 5-FU-based chemotherapeutic protocols in patients with GI/colorectal cancer, as well as the correlation of these cardiotoxic events with age, sex, cumulative dose, and risk factors such as obesity, hypertension, and family history of cardiac diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study consisting of 396 patients of both sexes was conducted in the oncology ward of Nishtar Hospital in Multan, Pakistan. Patients were grouped according to the therapeutic protocol they received (5-FU monotherapy or in combination, with different dosing regimens). Electrocardiography and serum troponin levels were used to assess 5-FU-induced cardiotoxicity. In cases where cardiotoxicity was detected, 5-FU treatment was interrupted; nitroglycerin, nitrates, and calcium channel blockers were administered; and cardiac monitoring was initiated. 5-FU was discontinued in all cases of acute myocardial infarction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 396 patients, 28.5% reported different cardiotoxic symptoms after receiving various 5-FU-containing protocols. 35% had anginal pain, 13% suffered a myocardial infarction, 11% developed hypertension, and 10% presented heart failure. Patients receiving 5-FU combination therapy showed cardiotoxic events that were significantly different from those on 5-FU monotherapy. Based on the ECG results, only the QTc-d interval increased significantly (p < 0.001) after therapy. 68% of the patients had troponin levels > 2 ng/mL at the end of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pre-existing cardiac diseases, treatment duration, smoking, and obesity were found to be influential components in the development of cardiotoxicity, and patients with cancer should be closely monitored during 5-FU chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552241275948"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142365568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2023-09-20DOI: 10.1177/10781552231203403
Soumaya El Baraka, Ali Cherif Chefchaouni, Aya Bourdaime, Jean-Marie Ouedraogo, Oumaima Shytry, Mohammed-Jaouad Belahcen, Younes Rahali
Objective: Most intravenous anticancer drugs are administered in a dose per unit area or body weight, if not promptly administered to another patient cytotoxic leftover would be destroyed. To contain wastage, low-cost measures are highly desirable to contain and reduce expenditures without impairing the quality of care. The objective of the study is to evaluate the cost saved through the use of the two cytotoxic waste management techniques implemented in National Institute of Oncology's centralized chemotherapy preparation unit, vial sharing and dose rounding.
Method: A 6-month prospective single centre study from 1 February to 1 August 2023 at the National Institute of Oncology of Rabat in Morocco. The number of prepared preparations and amount of drug saved by both vial sharing and dose rounding was collected using the centralized chemotherapy preparation unit's 'leftover tracking file', the corresponding cost saved were calculated and then compared for each technique and with 2018 results.
Results: In total, 18,218 preparations were considered in the 6-month study. With the vial sharing technique 636,524.5 mg were saved corresponding to 246,031.4 (USD) saved cost, against 212,838.4 mg by dose rounding corresponding to 75,598.5 (USD) saved cost. This saving corresponded to a total of 321,629.4 (USD). Compared to the 2018 results leftovers costs saved by vial sharing corresponded to 289,972.05 (USD) by vial sharing technique for 1-year extrapolated period, and this study shows a saved cost of 321,629.9 (USD) by both vial sharing and dose rounding techniques.
Conclusion: Dose rounding technique combined with vial sharing allowed National Institute of Oncology's centralized chemotherapy preparation unit to limit expensive cytotoxic cost wastage, highlighting these technique benefits.
{"title":"Evaluating cost savings in cytotoxic leftover management: A prospective study of vial sharing and dose rounding techniques in the Moroccan National Institute of Oncology.","authors":"Soumaya El Baraka, Ali Cherif Chefchaouni, Aya Bourdaime, Jean-Marie Ouedraogo, Oumaima Shytry, Mohammed-Jaouad Belahcen, Younes Rahali","doi":"10.1177/10781552231203403","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10781552231203403","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Most intravenous anticancer drugs are administered in a dose per unit area or body weight, if not promptly administered to another patient cytotoxic leftover would be destroyed. To contain wastage, low-cost measures are highly desirable to contain and reduce expenditures without impairing the quality of care. The objective of the study is to evaluate the cost saved through the use of the two cytotoxic waste management techniques implemented in National Institute of Oncology's centralized chemotherapy preparation unit, vial sharing and dose rounding.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A 6-month prospective single centre study from 1 February to 1 August 2023 at the National Institute of Oncology of Rabat in Morocco. The number of prepared preparations and amount of drug saved by both vial sharing and dose rounding was collected using the centralized chemotherapy preparation unit's 'leftover tracking file', the corresponding cost saved were calculated and then compared for each technique and with 2018 results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 18,218 preparations were considered in the 6-month study. With the vial sharing technique 636,524.5 mg were saved corresponding to 246,031.4 (USD) saved cost, against 212,838.4 mg by dose rounding corresponding to 75,598.5 (USD) saved cost. This saving corresponded to a total of 321,629.4 (USD). Compared to the 2018 results leftovers costs saved by vial sharing corresponded to 289,972.05 (USD) by vial sharing technique for 1-year extrapolated period, and this study shows a saved cost of 321,629.9 (USD) by both vial sharing and dose rounding techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dose rounding technique combined with vial sharing allowed National Institute of Oncology's centralized chemotherapy preparation unit to limit expensive cytotoxic cost wastage, highlighting these technique benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1152-1159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41176411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetic disorder characterized by bone marrow failure typically developing in the first decade of life, congenital abnormalities, and an increased predisposition to malignancy. However, patients with FA can remain undiagnosed until adulthood and present with solid organ malignancies. Due to impaired DNA repair mechanisms, patients with FA are highly susceptible to severe bone marrow toxicity when treated with cisplatin.
Case report: A 38-year-old woman, diagnosed with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the uterine cervix, underwent treatment with weekly cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy. After the second week of cisplatin treatment, she presented with severe pancytopenia. The prolonged and severe pancytopenia following cisplatin and radiation, along with cervical SCC in the absence of risk factors and the presence of parental consanguinity, raised the possibility of FA as the underlying cause. Whole exome sequencing revealed a homozygous FANCI c.668A > C (p.Lys223Thr) missense variant confirming the diagnosis of FA.
Management and outcome: The pancytopenia exhibited a protracted course, necessitating admission and supportive treatment with antibiotics, red blood cell and platelet transfusions, as well as filgrastim and eltrombopag. Eventually, the pancytopenia improved after approximately 40 days of hospitalization.
Discussion: SCC of the head and neck or gynecologic organs in a young adult without known risk factors should prompt consideration of FA. Cisplatin should be avoided in patients with FA.
{"title":"Cisplatin-induced bone marrow failure in an adult patient with Fanconi anemia.","authors":"Zeki Gokhan Surmeli, Rehab Helmy Mohamed Ibrahim, Nawaf Alkhalfan, Zeyad Mahmood","doi":"10.1177/10781552241268468","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10781552241268468","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetic disorder characterized by bone marrow failure typically developing in the first decade of life, congenital abnormalities, and an increased predisposition to malignancy. However, patients with FA can remain undiagnosed until adulthood and present with solid organ malignancies. Due to impaired DNA repair mechanisms, patients with FA are highly susceptible to severe bone marrow toxicity when treated with cisplatin.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 38-year-old woman, diagnosed with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the uterine cervix, underwent treatment with weekly cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy. After the second week of cisplatin treatment, she presented with severe pancytopenia. The prolonged and severe pancytopenia following cisplatin and radiation, along with cervical SCC in the absence of risk factors and the presence of parental consanguinity, raised the possibility of FA as the underlying cause. Whole exome sequencing revealed a homozygous <i>FANCI</i> c.668A > C (p.Lys223Thr) missense variant confirming the diagnosis of FA.</p><p><strong>Management and outcome: </strong>The pancytopenia exhibited a protracted course, necessitating admission and supportive treatment with antibiotics, red blood cell and platelet transfusions, as well as filgrastim and eltrombopag. Eventually, the pancytopenia improved after approximately 40 days of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>SCC of the head and neck or gynecologic organs in a young adult without known risk factors should prompt consideration of FA. Cisplatin should be avoided in patients with FA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1274-1277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141878916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1177/10781552241268693
Ruba Alchaikh Hassan, Abram Soliman, Constantin A Dasanu
Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR) are linked with side effects involving skin and mucosa. Herein, we present a unique case of oral lichenoid drug eruption (LDE) in a patient treated with osimertinib.
Case report: A 75-year-old woman was diagnosed with metastatic EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, and started on osimertinib 80 mg PO daily. At 24 months of therapy, the patient developed a painful, red, and white striated oral lesion involving the left buccal mucosa and the adjacent buccal aspect of gingivae. Biopsy showed oral LDE. Causality assessment between osimertinib and the oral LDE via Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction probability scale revealed a score of 5.
Management and outcome: Osimetinib discontinuation was not felt to be in the best interest of the patient. Therefore, diphenhydramine HCL mouthwash every 6 h PRN (before meals) was started. Spicy and hot foods were discontinued. At a four-week follow-up visit, the patient reported moderate improvement in her symptoms.
Conclusion: Oral LDEs are considered premalignant lesions as they can transform into squamous cell carcinoma; therefore, regular follow-up is needed. Awareness of this potential side effect of osimertinib would also prevent unnecessary (and potentially costly) work-up and lead to its prompt diagnosis and treatment.
{"title":"Oral lichenoid drug eruption due to osimertinib for lung cancer.","authors":"Ruba Alchaikh Hassan, Abram Soliman, Constantin A Dasanu","doi":"10.1177/10781552241268693","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10781552241268693","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR) are linked with side effects involving skin and mucosa. Herein, we present a unique case of oral lichenoid drug eruption (LDE) in a patient treated with osimertinib.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 75-year-old woman was diagnosed with metastatic EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, and started on osimertinib 80 mg PO daily. At 24 months of therapy, the patient developed a painful, red, and white striated oral lesion involving the left buccal mucosa and the adjacent buccal aspect of gingivae. Biopsy showed oral LDE. Causality assessment between osimertinib and the oral LDE via Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction probability scale revealed a score of 5.</p><p><strong>Management and outcome: </strong>Osimetinib discontinuation was not felt to be in the best interest of the patient. Therefore, diphenhydramine HCL mouthwash every 6 h PRN (before meals) was started. Spicy and hot foods were discontinued. At a four-week follow-up visit, the patient reported moderate improvement in her symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oral LDEs are considered premalignant lesions as they can transform into squamous cell carcinoma; therefore, regular follow-up is needed. Awareness of this potential side effect of osimertinib would also prevent unnecessary (and potentially costly) work-up and lead to its prompt diagnosis and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1278-1281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141875146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2023-09-20DOI: 10.1177/10781552231203371
Grzegorz Charliński, Norbert Grząśko, Łukasz Bołkun, Waldemar Sawicki, Edyta Paczkowska, Agnieszka Druzd-Sitek, Lidia Usnarska-Zubkiewicz, Aleksandra Butrym, Elżbieta Wiater, Piotr Boguradzki, Bożena Budziszewska, Małgorzata Wojciechowska, Monika Mordak-Domagała, Artur Jurczyszyn
Introduction: Therapeutic adherence (TA) is one of the most important factors influencing the effectiveness of treatment. Oral anti-cancer drugs are increasingly used to treat malignancy including multiple myeloma (MM). Our study aimed to determine TA of patients with MM treated with IMiDs, to identify TA risk factors, and to determine satisfaction with medical care during the treatment with IMiDs.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey-based study involving adult patients with MM treated with IMiDs.
Results: Between January 2021 and May 2021, 267 patients with MM were enrolled in the study. The dosing schedule was declared as easy by 71.8% of patients, as standard for 24.0%, and difficult for 4.2% of patients. During MM treatment, 85.0% of patients did not skip any IMiDs dose, and 87.6% did not skip the IMiDs dose in the last cycle of chemotherapy. Identified factors affecting TA included the treatment duration and education level. In addition, depending on the patient's well-being, gender, and household companionship influenced TA. Satisfaction with medical care during the treatment with IMiDs was declared by 95.5% of patients with MM. In our cohort, 95.5% of patients were satisfied with the information they received from the hematologist during treatment with IMiDs.
Conclusions: Patients with MM treated with IMiDs are highly adherent to treatment. With time from the beginning of treatment, patients need more attention and motivation to adhere to the therapy rules.
{"title":"Therapeutic adherence and assessment of satisfaction patients with multiple myeloma treated with immunomodulatory drugs in a \"real-world\" study: Experiences of the Polish Myeloma Group.","authors":"Grzegorz Charliński, Norbert Grząśko, Łukasz Bołkun, Waldemar Sawicki, Edyta Paczkowska, Agnieszka Druzd-Sitek, Lidia Usnarska-Zubkiewicz, Aleksandra Butrym, Elżbieta Wiater, Piotr Boguradzki, Bożena Budziszewska, Małgorzata Wojciechowska, Monika Mordak-Domagała, Artur Jurczyszyn","doi":"10.1177/10781552231203371","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10781552231203371","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Therapeutic adherence (TA) is one of the most important factors influencing the effectiveness of treatment. Oral anti-cancer drugs are increasingly used to treat malignancy including multiple myeloma (MM). Our study aimed to determine TA of patients with MM treated with IMiDs, to identify TA risk factors, and to determine satisfaction with medical care during the treatment with IMiDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey-based study involving adult patients with MM treated with IMiDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2021 and May 2021, 267 patients with MM were enrolled in the study. The dosing schedule was declared as easy by 71.8% of patients, as standard for 24.0%, and difficult for 4.2% of patients. During MM treatment, 85.0% of patients did not skip any IMiDs dose, and 87.6% did not skip the IMiDs dose in the last cycle of chemotherapy. Identified factors affecting TA included the treatment duration and education level. In addition, depending on the patient's well-being, gender, and household companionship influenced TA. Satisfaction with medical care during the treatment with IMiDs was declared by 95.5% of patients with MM. In our cohort, 95.5% of patients were satisfied with the information they received from the hematologist during treatment with IMiDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with MM treated with IMiDs are highly adherent to treatment. With time from the beginning of treatment, patients need more attention and motivation to adhere to the therapy rules.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1144-1151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41099486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Bone modifying agents (BMAs) have been used to prevent skeletal-related events (SRE) in cancer patients with bone metastases. In this meta-analysis, efficacy and adverse events (AEs) were studied based on a de-escalation strategy in which the BMA dosing interval was prolonged from 4 to 12 weeks.
Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, ICHUSHI, and CINAHL were searched for articles on BMA dosing intervals from outcomes measured were the incidence of SRE and related various AEs. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate relative risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Result: The meta-analysis included three randomized controlled studies (RCTs) of Zoledronic acid hydrate (ZA) (n = 2663) and six RCTs (n = 141) on BMA other than ZA. There was no difference in the incidence of SREs when comparing the dosing frequency of 12 versus 4 weeks for BMA (RR = 1.21, 95% CI [0.82-1.78], p = 0.33). Further, AEs related to treatment discontinuation were significantly less frequent with ZA given every 12 weeks than when given every 4 weeks (RR = 0.51 [0.30-0.89], p = 0.02). In particular, renal dysfunction leading to grade ≥3 or discontinuation of treatment with ZA occurred significantly less frequently with every 12-week dosing (RR = 0.33 [0.12-0.91], p = 0.33).
Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed no influence of BMA de-escalation on the incidence of SRE; nevertheless, AEs appeared to reduce with the de-escalated usage of ZA.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of bone management agents administered at 12 weeks vs. 4 weeks in patients with bone metastases: A systematic review.","authors":"Junya Sato, Makoto Kodaira, Hiroyuki Harada, Haruo Iguchi, Taichi Yoshida, Hiroyuki Shibata","doi":"10.1177/10781552231203720","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10781552231203720","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone modifying agents (BMAs) have been used to prevent skeletal-related events (SRE) in cancer patients with bone metastases. In this meta-analysis, efficacy and adverse events (AEs) were studied based on a de-escalation strategy in which the BMA dosing interval was prolonged from 4 to 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane, ICHUSHI, and CINAHL were searched for articles on BMA dosing intervals from outcomes measured were the incidence of SRE and related various AEs. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate relative risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The meta-analysis included three randomized controlled studies (RCTs) of Zoledronic acid hydrate (ZA) (<i>n</i> = 2663) and six RCTs (<i>n</i> = 141) on BMA other than ZA. There was no difference in the incidence of SREs when comparing the dosing frequency of 12 versus 4 weeks for BMA (RR = 1.21, 95% CI [0.82-1.78], <i>p</i> = 0.33). Further, AEs related to treatment discontinuation were significantly less frequent with ZA given every 12 weeks than when given every 4 weeks (RR = 0.51 [0.30-0.89], <i>p</i> = 0.02). In particular, renal dysfunction leading to grade ≥3 or discontinuation of treatment with ZA occurred significantly less frequently with every 12-week dosing (RR = 0.33 [0.12-0.91], <i>p</i> = 0.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis showed no influence of BMA de-escalation on the incidence of SRE; nevertheless, AEs appeared to reduce with the de-escalated usage of ZA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1160-1172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41135964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2023-10-17DOI: 10.1177/10781552231207271
Sidra Awan, Pooja Bharucha, Luke Steventon, Helen Simpson, Tanya Ahmad, Sarah Benafif, Heather Shaw, Pinkie Chambers
Introduction: The incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is well described. However, the impact on emergency care services is not. This study investigated the incidence of irAEs out-of-hours, and the management used to mitigate symptoms and side effects.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study reviewed all emergency presentations triaged by the acute oncology team between December 2021 and June 2022, between 5 pm and 9 am. Patients were identified from triage audit sheets and remaining data points were retrieved from electronic health records. Inclusion criteria included all adult patients admitted on an ICI at one tertiary centre.
Results: In 7 months, 970 patients called the acute oncology helpline 11% (n = 109) of patients were on an ICI treatment. After clinical review, 78% (n = 70) resulted in hospital admissions, with length of stay cumulating to 496 bed days. 56% (n = 39) of patients delayed reporting symptoms, ranging between 12 hours and 10 days from symptom onset to seeking support. 49% (n = 34) patients received steroids to manage suspected irAEs. Dexamethasone was the most common steroid used in 71% (n = 24) of patients, and variation was found in prescribed doses.
Conclusions: These results underline the urgent need to address patient and staff education on adverse effects related to ICI. Patients require a comprehensive understanding of the symptoms and importance of prompt reporting. Staff education on recognition and treatment management is needed to reduce variation in practice. Further research is needed to identify barriers in symptom reporting and focus on realtime reporting to reduce the out-of-hours burden on services.
{"title":"Out-of-hours admissions in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and their primary management with steroids.","authors":"Sidra Awan, Pooja Bharucha, Luke Steventon, Helen Simpson, Tanya Ahmad, Sarah Benafif, Heather Shaw, Pinkie Chambers","doi":"10.1177/10781552231207271","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10781552231207271","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is well described. However, the impact on emergency care services is not. This study investigated the incidence of irAEs out-of-hours, and the management used to mitigate symptoms and side effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study reviewed all emergency presentations triaged by the acute oncology team between December 2021 and June 2022, between 5 pm and 9 am. Patients were identified from triage audit sheets and remaining data points were retrieved from electronic health records. Inclusion criteria included all adult patients admitted on an ICI at one tertiary centre.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 7 months, 970 patients called the acute oncology helpline 11% (n = 109) of patients were on an ICI treatment. After clinical review, 78% (n = 70) resulted in hospital admissions, with length of stay cumulating to 496 bed days. 56% (n = 39) of patients delayed reporting symptoms, ranging between 12 hours and 10 days from symptom onset to seeking support. 49% (n = 34) patients received steroids to manage suspected irAEs. Dexamethasone was the most common steroid used in 71% (n = 24) of patients, and variation was found in prescribed doses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results underline the urgent need to address patient and staff education on adverse effects related to ICI. Patients require a comprehensive understanding of the symptoms and importance of prompt reporting. Staff education on recognition and treatment management is needed to reduce variation in practice. Further research is needed to identify barriers in symptom reporting and focus on realtime reporting to reduce the out-of-hours burden on services.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1193-1199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531077/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41236177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-09-02DOI: 10.1177/10781552241280664
Wardah Masood, Omar Akhlaq Bhutta, Muhammad Ahsan Rasheed, Adeel Siddiqui
This article aims to explore the access of patient assistance program (PAPs) and the role of pharmacists in improving access to oncology care in Pakistan. PAPs aim to reduce the financial burden of cancer in Pakistan, with pharmaceutical companies providing medication at reduced costs, ranging from 33% to 90%. Pharmacists play a pivotal role in managing these programs, facilitating PAP, pharmacist, oncology care setting, cancer therapy more accessible to those who faced financial barriers to accessing them.
{"title":"Enhancing access to expensive oncology medications in Pakistan: The critical role of pharmaceutical patient assistance programs in oncology care.","authors":"Wardah Masood, Omar Akhlaq Bhutta, Muhammad Ahsan Rasheed, Adeel Siddiqui","doi":"10.1177/10781552241280664","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10781552241280664","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article aims to explore the access of patient assistance program (PAPs) and the role of pharmacists in improving access to oncology care in Pakistan. PAPs aim to reduce the financial burden of cancer in Pakistan, with pharmaceutical companies providing medication at reduced costs, ranging from 33% to 90%. Pharmacists play a pivotal role in managing these programs, facilitating PAP, pharmacist, oncology care setting, cancer therapy more accessible to those who faced financial barriers to accessing them.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1287-1289"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142108435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}