Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice最新文献

Background: Higher prevalence of inappropriate medication use among cancer patients increases risk of drug-related problems(DRP) like drug-drug interactions, ADR, and non-adherence. Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) and Potential Prescription Omission (PPO) were identified using Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) and Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to the Right Treatment (START) criteria. Objectives: The study objective was to optimize prescriptions for the elderly by analyzing the impact of medication review. Methods: An observational study in which PIM and/or PPO were identified and the prescriptions were optimized by a physician. Results: Out of 150 patients, a total of 35 drugs were stopped and 12 drugs were started. Medication omissions were identified in 12 patients (8%). There were no DRPs associated with medication adjustments. Conclusion: Based on a pharmacist-led comprehensive medication review of the elderly, the STOPP and START criteria allow the optimization of prescriptions.

Introduction: Venetoclax is a potent oral oncology drug (OOD) frequently used to treat hematologic cancers due to its convenience and high efficacy. However, some patients cannot tolerate solid oral formulations, requiring a reformulated version of venetoclax for effective administration. Currently, there is limited information in the literature regarding the extemporaneous compounding of venetoclax.

Methods: We present our institution's medication use process (MUP) for preparing compounded suspensions of venetoclax for patients with dysphagia who cannot tolerate solid oral formulations. This report has two main aims: to review our MUP from design to implementation, illustrated with real patient cases, and to present it as a strategy for administering venetoclax-based therapies to patients with dysphagia or feeding tubes. From February 2020 to January 2024, 17 patients received venetoclax through the standard MUP, with four developing tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). This study describes their clinical courses and evaluates their responses to the compounded suspensions, considering the uncertain effects of venetoclax prepared through this method.

Results: The four patients received venetoclax suspensions during hospitalization due to swallowing difficulties or nutritional support needs. We prepared extemporaneous venetoclax suspensions to ensure continuous therapy, thus avoiding treatment interruptions. TLS was managed using rasburicase and prophylactic allopurinol.

Conclusions: The clinical outcomes indicate that the current MUP provides a practical approach to administering venetoclax for dysphagic patients. However, additional research is needed to determine if there are pharmacokinetic differences in the bioavailability of venetoclax between oral and enterally delivered formulations. Further studies will help inform best practices for patient care.

Introduction: Leukemia, a complex hematological malignancy, requires a multidisciplinary treatment approach, with clinical pharmacists playing a crucial role. However, their involvement in clinical practice is not well-documented in the literature. This study aimed to examine the characteristics of clinical pharmacy interventions (CPIs) reported by clinical pharmacists.

Method: This retrospective study involved extraction of CPIs entered into a pharmacy documentation database "Quantifi^®" between January 2019 and June 2023. These CPIs included direct clinical pharmacist interventions (DCPIs), detected medication errors (MEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

Results: A total of 6286 CPIs were extracted, of which DCPIs, MEs and ADRs accounted for 5701 (90.7%), 357 (5.7%) and 228 (3.6%) reports, respectively. The most prevalent DCPIs were drug therapy discontinuation (n = 1080, 18.9%). Antimicrobials were the most common medications associated with DCPIs (n = 1991, 34.9%). Physicians accepted 99.4% of DCPIs and 64.1% (n = 3656) of direct interventions were considered significant. Among detected MEs, antimicrobials were the most reported medications (n = 158, 44.3%), with pharmacy internal errors being the most prevalent cause of the events (n = 172, 48.2%). Among the reported ADRs, hematological reactions were the most common (n = 81, 35.5%), and antineoplastic agents were the most frequently associated medications with ADRs (n = 164, 71.9%).

Conclusion: This study highlights the crucial role of clinical pharmacists in managing leukemia patients, emphasizing their key interventions and ability to identify MEs and ADRs. Further research is needed to explore the clinical outcomes and financial impact of their involvement.

Objective: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common kidney cancer, with clear cell RCC being the predominant subtype. However, non-clear cell RCC constitutes a significant proportion of cases, presenting distinct challenges in treatment due to its varied histological subtypes. Despite recent advancements, the optimal therapeutic approach for non-clear cell RCC remains uncertain due to limited high-quality evidence. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of systemic therapies in nccRCC subgroups.

Data source: A comprehensive literature search identified studies from 2010 to 2024, using PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov databases focusing on clinical trials and treatment outcomes.

Data summary: Results highlight the evolving therapeutic landscape, with targeted agents and immunotherapy demonstrating promising anti-tumor effects. Notably, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as sunitinib and mTOR inhibitors like temsirolimus have shown efficacy across different subtypes. Combination therapies, including immunotherapy-based regimens, have also shown favorable outcomes. immune checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity. Furthermore, specific targeting of signaling pathways, such as the c-MET pathway, has demonstrated efficacy in certain PapillaryRCC.

Conclusion: While combination therapies, including immunotherapies, have shown positive outcomes, immune checkpoint inhibitors like nivolumab and pembrolizumab have demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity. Additionally, targeting the c-MET pathway has proven effective in certain papillary RCC. Further research is warranted to establish optimal treatment strategies and improve outcomes for patients with non-clear cell RCC. Systemic therapy for non-clear cell RCC is complex and evolving. Further research is needed to delineate optimal treatment strategies for different histological subtypes and improve patient outcomes.

Background: The Arab world consists of 22 countries, representing 5.5% of the world's population. Morphine consumption accounts for less than 1% of the world's consumption. This is the first study to identify barriers to opioid use in the Arab world.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the barriers to opioid use in pain management in the Arab world.

Method: Online survey was developed to investigate barriers to governance, prescribing, distributing, dispensing and administering, as well as educational barriers in the Arab world. The questionnaire was sent via email and a mobile app to one expert physician in pain management and one licensed pharmacist from each Arab country.

Results: With the exception of Tunisia, Djibouti and Comoros, 34(77%) participants from 19 Arab countries answered the survey. Most countries lack local opioid production, necessitate special licenses for physicians, and restrict opioid prescribing to medical specialists. Special prescription forms are mandated, and pharmacists lack the authority to correct prescription errors or accept refill or verbal orders on opioids. Storage requirements for empty ampoules and prescriptions are enforced. Nurses are not allowed to carry opioids during home visits, and only first degree relatives can collect opioids for patients. Furthermore, the integration of palliative care and pain management curricula into pharmacies and medical schools is lacking.

Conclusion: There is a wide range of regulatory and other barriers to opioid use in the Arab world. There is a substantial need for regulatory review and reform, as well as for educational initiatives, in most Arab countries.

Objectives: The study aimed to: 1) Describe the carboplatin dosing criteria in obese patients in routine clinical practicein a general university hospital. 2) Evaluate toxicity based on the dosing criterion used. 3) Assess effectiveness in major diagnoses according to the dosing criterion employed.

Methodology: An observational, retrospective, descriptive study, including all obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) who started carboplatin treatment between 1^st January 2012 and 31^st January 2015. Data on patient characteristics, disease and treatment were collected. As a result variables were collected: carboplatin dosing methods, dosage criteria, alternative dosing approaches, treatment delays, dose reductions, relative dose intensity, adverse reactions and severity (CTCAE v. 4.0) as well as overall survival and progressive free survival for major diagnoses.

Conclusions: 1) Carboplatin dosing at the centre used Calvert's formula for calculating AUC and Cockcroft-Gault's formula for estimating glomerular filtration rate. 2) Cockcroft-Gault's formula employed actual body weight and ideal adjusted body weight in similar proportions. 3) The ideal adjusted body weight was more commonly used in patients with higher obesity and diabetes. 4) In the general population, the developmental trend of toxicity during treatment was greater in the group dosed by actual body weight, reaching significant differences in thrombopenia, neutropenia, GOT elevation, hyporexia and myalgias. 5) Major diagnoses in the present study were ovarian cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. The effectiveness in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival, comparing the groups dosed by actual body weight and ideal adjusted body weight within each pathology did not show statistically significant differences.

Purpose: To examine the feasibility and utility of a clinical pharmacist-led multidisciplinary deprescribing intervention in hospitalized cancer patients.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study among cancer patients hospitalized in oncology department who underwent a medication review by a clinical pharmacist. The pharmacist's recommendations were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. We collected demographic and clinical information, including information on medication burden before and after intervention and number and types of deprescribing recommendations and their acceptance, and compared them among patients with different estimated life expectancies.

Results: During a 2-year study period, 392 patients evaluated by the clinical pharmacist received 2808 prescriptions (median, 7 per patient). The clinical pharmacist recommended deprescribing of 559 medications (19.9%; 95 CI, 18.4-21.4%), at least 1 medication in 321 patients (82%). The multidisciplinary team accepted 89.6% of deprescribing recommendations, resulting in a reduction of the medication burden by 501 medications (P < 0.001). 12.8% of deprescriptions addressed clinically manifested adverse drug effects in 15.1% of patients. The estimation of life expectancy by the senior oncologist was reasonably accurate, but did not affect deprescribing rate.

Conclusions: A clinical pharmacist-led deprescribing intervention within a multidisciplinary team effectively reduces medication burden and addresses adverse drug effects in cancer patients. Deprescribing interventions should be incorporated in cancer patients at any stage of the disease.

Introduction: There exists some apprehension by prescribers, healthcare providers, and other stakeholders regarding the real-world safety and effectiveness of biosimilars. While some of the apprehension is likely due to clinician knowledge gaps in the biosimilarity exercise, additional data (including those generated from the real-world) regarding safety and efficacy could reduce a clinician's perception of biosimilar uncertainty and can potentially increase biosimilar acceptance and uptake. The published literature is lacking regarding the real-world impact on healthcare costs and clinical outcomes when a single healthcare institution converts from filgrastim to filgrastim-sndz as its short-acting Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (GCSF), especially within diverse populations and indications not explicitly studied through the registration trials. Specifically, both filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz possess FDA-approved indications within patients with hematologic malignancies receiving high-dose chemotherapy and in those undergoing bone marrow transplantation. As a biosimilar to filgrastim, the FDA did not require prospective, randomized controlled trials to obtain these indications for filgrastim-sndz. The purpose of this study is to describe real-world healthcare resource costs, utilization patterns, and clinical outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies who received filgrastim-sndz or filgrastim to support neutrophil recovery following chemotherapy (i.e., induction or consolidation) or a bone marrow transplant (BMT) at Yale New Haven Hospital (YNHH).

Methods: A total of 148 patients were identified and met the following criteria: at least 18 years old, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2, absence of fever or infection, newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or newly post-bone marrow transplant and received filgrastim-sndz (Zarxio^®) or reference filgrastim (Neupogen^®).

Results: Healthcare resource utilization outcomes were compared between biosimilar and reference filgrastim using descriptive statistics. There were no major differences between either cohort, including duration of hospitalization, the number of overall emergency room visits and additional hospital admissions with a primary diagnosis of febrile neutropenia or neutropenia within 30 days post-discharge from initial hospital admission, time to neutrophil recovery following GCSF support, and the incidence and duration of both fever and febrile neutropenia. The total cost based on treatment of all patients in each arm differed significantly with filgrastim-sndz being the most cost-effective choice.

Conclusion: filgrastim-sndz significantly reduced healthcare utilization costs compared to reference filgrastim with similar effect on absolute neutrophil count, incidence of fever, and febrile neutropenia.

Introduction: Second-generation androgen receptor antagonists, including enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide, are commonly used to treat metastatic and non-metastatic prostate cancer. Although these medications are typically well-tolerated, falls were reported in 4.2-15.6% of patients and fractures in 4.2-11.7% of patients enrolled in the phase III clinical trials evaluating these drugs in prostate cancer. However, post-marketing studies have reported a lower incidence than reported in clinical trials. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of falls and fractures in patients with prostate cancer receiving second-generation androgen receptor antagonists at UConn Health and identify potential risk factors associated with falls and fractures in these patients.

Methods: A retrospective chart review involving patients with prostate cancer treated with darolutamide, enzalutamide, or apalutamide from March 1, 2022, to March 31, 2023, at UConn Health Carole & Ray Neag Comprehensive Cancer Center. Data recorded includes basic demographics, history of fall or fracture, presence of metastases, fall risk, history of osteoporosis, prescribed second-generation androgen receptor antagonist, and other comorbidities. Data was evaluated using descriptive statistics.

Results: Twenty-six men were included, all of whom were receiving enzalutamide. At baseline, 96.1% of patients had bone metastases, 15.4% had osteoporosis, 15.4% had osteopenia, and 34.6% had neuropathy. The incidence of falls was 19.2% and the incidence of fractures was 26.9%. The mean length of therapy at time of a fall was 19.44 months (range, 6-31 months). The mean length of therapy at time of a fracture was 19 months (range, 1-33 months). In patients experiencing fall, 100% had arthralgia, 60% had neuropathy, 40% had a gait problem, 40% had hypertension, and 80% of them were at risk of fall. In patients experiencing fracture, 28.6% had osteoporosis, 42.9% had osteopenia, 100% had bone metastases, and 57.1% were on denosumab at time of fracture.

Conclusion: The prevalence of falls and fractures in patients receiving enzalutamide were higher in this retrospective chart review than reported in clinical trials and post-marketing studies. This could be due to the small patient population or the patient's comorbidities such as osteoporosis, bone metastases, or neuropathy. Fall/fracture risk with enzalutamide and other risk factors for fall and fracture should be considered when discussing treatment and developing a monitoring plan.

Introduction: Hypomagnesemia is a common issue in patients with cancer due to magnesium wasting drugs like calcineurin inhibitors, chemotherapy sides effects such as diarrhea, and poor oral intake. Historically, magnesium has been given over prolonged infusions due to concern for rapid elimination of magnesium when large doses are administered. At UW Health, magnesium was given at a rate of 1g/60 min. A prolonged infusion rate often creates logistical issues including limited IV access, incompatibility concerns and increased chair time. The purpose of this project is to increase the infusion rate of IV magnesium without compromising therapeutic repletion, benefit, and safety.

Methods: The magnesium infusion rate was increased to the following rates: 4g/60 min, 2g/30 min, 1g/15 min. The primary outcome is the grams of IV magnesium replaced per outpatient visit between the pre-intervention (prolonged) and post-intervention (rapid) groups. Secondary outcomes include assessment of differences in chair time between groups and total incidence of critical magnesium lab values.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in magnesium requirements per outpatient visit between a prolonged and rapid magnesium infusion rate (2.18g vs 2.15g; p = 0.49). Additionally, there was no difference in number of outpatient visits (3 vs 3; p = 1). The average chair time was decreased by 110 min per outpatient encounter between the prolonged and rapid magnesium infusion rate, which was determined to be clinically and statistically significant.

Conclusion: This study suggests that there is no difference in magnesium requirements between a rapid or prolonged magnesium infusion in both solid and liquid tumor patients.