Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice最新文献

Background: Despite evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of aprepitant for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), its use in stem cell transplant settings across Canada is not standard. While pharmacokinetic data exists, the clinical significance of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP 3A4) inhibition of cyclophosphamide by aprepitant is unclear. Reduced activation of cyclophosphamide may reduce the effectiveness of dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DICEP).

Objectives: To compare response rates to DICEP in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the presence and absence of aprepitant.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients who received full-dose DICEP for relapsed/refractory HL or DLBCL between June 1995 and September 2018 at the Foothills Medical Centre (FMC) in Calgary, Alberta, Canada was conducted. Descriptive statistics were used to assess response rate, as defined by the 2007 International Working Group response criteria.

Results: Of the 218 patients included in this study, 87.6% of patients in the control group and 88.5% of patients in the aprepitant group responded to DICEP (difference 0.025 [95% CI, -0.066 to 0.114], p = 0.827). Univariate analyses for age, sex, type of cancer, stage of cancer, number of prior relapses, and relapse status were not significant. No significant differences were observed for secondary outcomes.

Conclusion: Response rates to DICEP in relapsed/refractory HL and DLBCL patients were similar regardless of aprepitant use. Considering these results and the effectiveness of aprepitant in CINV, its addition to standard antiemetic therapy in patients receiving DICEP should be given strong consideration in the transplant setting.

Introduction: Veterinary oncology is constituted mainly by human-use drugs with hazardous agents. Occupational risks are present in all stages of handling. Many studies highlighted that veterinarians and pharmacists staff present a lack of knowledge and insufficient structure for promoting safety practices. This study investigated the professional profile and structure of veterinary antineoplastic chemotherapy in Brazilian services.

Methods: A nationwide survey was carried out through digital platforms by a self-applicable from 2020 to 2021. The characteristics of the structure, facilities, professional profiles, practices related to antineoplastic chemotherapy services, and inspections provided by regulatory companies were investigated. Frequency and ranges were used to examine and describe data.

Results: This study analyzed 108 respondents from all Brazilian regions where 36 participants worked in veterinary oncology. Dogs and cats comprised more than 90% of animals assisted. Vincristine, doxorubicin, carboplatin, vinblastine, and cyclophosphamide were the most commonly used drugs. Considering pharmacists-led (n = 4) vs veterinarians-led (n = 18) services, structure with safety for handling hazardous drugs (4 vs 9), correct PPE usage (3 vs 0), and occurrence of occupational accident (0 vs 5) were registered. Almost 60% were dissatisfied with the structure and the managerial unwillingness to promote facility improvements. The majority of participants reported an absence of service inspection.

Conclusion: The results demonstrated worrying concerning the inadequacy of the physical structure of the facilities, human resources, and handling hazardous drugs increased occupational health risk. The lack of competent authority standards and supervision corroborates practices that expose professionals, the population, and the environment to hazardous agents.

Introduction: Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetic disorder characterized by bone marrow failure typically developing in the first decade of life, congenital abnormalities, and an increased predisposition to malignancy. However, patients with FA can remain undiagnosed until adulthood and present with solid organ malignancies. Due to impaired DNA repair mechanisms, patients with FA are highly susceptible to severe bone marrow toxicity when treated with cisplatin.

Case report: A 38-year-old woman, diagnosed with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the uterine cervix, underwent treatment with weekly cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy. After the second week of cisplatin treatment, she presented with severe pancytopenia. The prolonged and severe pancytopenia following cisplatin and radiation, along with cervical SCC in the absence of risk factors and the presence of parental consanguinity, raised the possibility of FA as the underlying cause. Whole exome sequencing revealed a homozygous FANCI c.668A > C (p.Lys223Thr) missense variant confirming the diagnosis of FA.

Management and outcome: The pancytopenia exhibited a protracted course, necessitating admission and supportive treatment with antibiotics, red blood cell and platelet transfusions, as well as filgrastim and eltrombopag. Eventually, the pancytopenia improved after approximately 40 days of hospitalization.

Discussion: SCC of the head and neck or gynecologic organs in a young adult without known risk factors should prompt consideration of FA. Cisplatin should be avoided in patients with FA.

Objective: This longitudinal study aimed to evaluate the overall efficacy of mouthwashes in oral mucositis pain and mucositis xerostomia in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) at different phases throughout treatment.

Methods: A longitudinal study enrolled 79 advanced NPC subjects receiving CCRT. The subjects were interviewed prospectively three times over 7 weeks for pain and xerostomia scores based on the various types of mouthwash used. The median pain score difference and median xerostomia score difference were utilised to determine mouthwash superiority.

Results: Participants completed three interviews, during which 480 instances of mouthwash use were observed throughout different phases of the treatment period. The results showed that the median pain scores between mouthwashes differed significantly, H-Stat(3) = 30.0, 25.7 and 26.0, respectively, with p < 0.001 for all three interviews. The pain score reductions of lidocaine mouthwash (median = 2, interquartile range (IQR) = 3, 2 and 2.75 over the three interviews, respectively) were significantly higher than those of benzydamine and sodium bicarbonate mouthwashes. There were no significant differences between the studied mouthwashes in their xerostomia score reductions.

Conclusions: Lidocaine mouthwash was superior in managing oral mucositis pain at all phases throughout the entire chemoradiotherapy treatment for advanced NPC patients. There was insufficient evidence to determine the preferred mouthwash for treating oral mucositis xerostomia.

Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody IgG4 programmed cell death protein 1 antagonist, and its use in oncology has been increasing in recent years, providing durable and favorable responses and tolerable toxicity profiles in various types of cancer. We describe a case of pembrolizumab related perforated appendicitis in a patient with stage 3C malignant melanoma (MM).

Case report: A 70-year-old male patient who had no known disease was diagnosed with MM as a result of the excision of the mass on his right shoulder. The disease stage was stage 3C (pT4aN1bM0). Subsequently, adjuvant pembrolizumab treatment was started. A few days after the fourth maintenance course, he presented to the emergency department complaining of abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting. Emergency abdominal tomography showed a significant increase in the diameter of the appendix vermiformis, peritoneal thickening and appendiceal wall defects that could be significant in terms of perforation.

Management and outcome: The mentioned finding and given the clinical presentation, was attributed to a perporating of the appendix, so the patient was hospitalized in the Department of Surgery and the patient underwent emergency appendectomy. Histological findings were consistent with appendicitis. After a day in the hospital, the abdominal pain subsided, C-reactive protein tended to decrease and the patient was discharged.

Discussion: In patients who develop acute abdominal pain with or without diarrhea during immunotherapy, urgent imaging, endoscopic and clinical evaluation should be performed, and bowel perforation, although rare, should be considered as a potential complication of any immunotherapy.

Objectives: The objective of this investigation was to assess the impact of concurrent proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who received palbociclib as first-line or successives therapy.

Materials and methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted, enrolling patients diagnosed with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative mBC, and eligible for palbociclib treatment. Patients were categorized as "concurrent PPIs" if they received PPIs for at least two-thirds of the palbociclib therapy duration, and as "no concurrent PPIs" if they did not receive PPIs during the course of palbociclib treatment.

Results: A total of 165 patients were included in the study. Among first-line patients treated with palbociclib, those using concurrent PPIs exhibited a PFS of 8.88 months, while patients using palbociclib without concurrent PPIs had a PFS of 67.81 months (p < 0.0001). In second-line or subsequent treatments, patients on palbociclib with concurrent PPIs had a PFS of 7.46 months, whereas those using palbociclib without concurrent PPIs had a PFS of 17.29 months (p = 0.122).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the concurrent use of PPIs in mBC patients receiving palbociclib negatively affects PFS, particularly in the first-line setting. Nevertheless, further investigation is warranted to explore the impact of PPIs on cycle-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors.

Introduction: Teclistamab, a bispecific T-cell engaging antibody targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), is indicated for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after at least four lines of therapy. It has boxed warnings for life threatening cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). To mitigate these risks, teclistamab is initiated using step-up doses. This article examines safety event rates following the implementation of a 2-day separation between step-up doses at one institution to streamline patient care.

Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center study encompassing all patients who received teclistamab within a 1-year period. The primary endpoint was the overall incidence of CRS and ICANS. Secondary endpoints included hospital length of stay, hematological toxicities, infection rates, among other adverse events.

Results: A total of 27 patients were included in the analysis and stratified into accelerated (days 1,3,5) or standard (days 1,4,7) dosing groups. CRS occurred in 48% (11) of patients for the accelerated dosing and 50% (2) for the standard dosing group. ICANS was seen in 17% (4) of patients in the accelerated dosing group and none in the standard dosing group. Average length of stay in the accelerated dose was 7.6 days versus 9.2 days in the standard dose group.

Conclusion: Accelerated dose escalation of teclistamab yielded safety event rates comparable to those in the literature. These findings may support outpatient administration for teclistamab. Accelerated dose escalation strategy allowed for the optimization of hospitalization and resources.

Introduction: Breast cancer is one of the top three malignancies worldwide. While radiotherapy, hormone replacement therapys, and chemotherapy are treatments, chemotherapy causes adverse effects that hinder daily life activities.

Objectives: To assess the prevalence, severity, and association of symptomatic toxicities in female breast cancer patients affecting various organ systems post systemic chemotherapy (adjuvant and neoadjuvant), and their impact on daily activities. Additionally, to determine the severity of adverse effects in specific age groups and their association with family history and disease stage.

Methodology: An observational study was conducted on 253 female breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy at NORI Cancer Hospital from May to October 2023. Data collection tools included the NCI-PRO-CTCAE standardized questionnaire and patient medical records. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, T-tests, and Chi-square tests.

Results: Among the 253 patients, 41.4% were aged 41-50. Significant weight changes (p = 0.034) were observed with more than three chemotherapy cycles. Notable associations included increased chemotherapy cycles with gastrointestinal (mouth/throat sores p = 0.031, vomiting p = 0.021), respiratory (cough p = 0.04), cardiovascular (arm/leg swelling p = 0.007, palpitations p = 0.052), integumentary (hair loss p = 0.000, skin dryness p = 0.054), and musculoskeletal (fatigue p = 0.002) adverse effects. Positive family history and the 18-30 age group also showed significant associations with adverse effect severity. Disease stage significantly influenced the nervous system (stage 2 p = 0.007, stage 3 p = 0.01).

Conclusion: The severity of adverse effects varies among age groups, depending on disease stage, genetics, and treatment duration. These patient-reported outcomes highlight the need for better management strategies considering prognostic factors and treatment adverse effects.

Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR) are linked with side effects involving skin and mucosa. Herein, we present a unique case of oral lichenoid drug eruption (LDE) in a patient treated with osimertinib.

Case report: A 75-year-old woman was diagnosed with metastatic EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, and started on osimertinib 80 mg PO daily. At 24 months of therapy, the patient developed a painful, red, and white striated oral lesion involving the left buccal mucosa and the adjacent buccal aspect of gingivae. Biopsy showed oral LDE. Causality assessment between osimertinib and the oral LDE via Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction probability scale revealed a score of 5.

Management and outcome: Osimetinib discontinuation was not felt to be in the best interest of the patient. Therefore, diphenhydramine HCL mouthwash every 6 h PRN (before meals) was started. Spicy and hot foods were discontinued. At a four-week follow-up visit, the patient reported moderate improvement in her symptoms.

Conclusion: Oral LDEs are considered premalignant lesions as they can transform into squamous cell carcinoma; therefore, regular follow-up is needed. Awareness of this potential side effect of osimertinib would also prevent unnecessary (and potentially costly) work-up and lead to its prompt diagnosis and treatment.

Introduction: The treatment of cancer is associated with high risk for toxicity and high cost. Strategies to enhance the value, quality, and safety of cancer care are often managed independently of one another. Oncology stewardship is a potential framework to unify these efforts and enhance outcomes. This landscape survey establishes baseline information on oncology stewardship in the United States.

Methods: The Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA) distributed a 38-item survey composed of demographic, institutional, clinical decision-making, support staff, metrics, and technology sections to 675 HOPA members between 9 September 2022 and 9 October 2022.

Results: Most organizations (78%) have adopted general pharmacy stewardship practices; however, only 31% reported having established a formalized oncology stewardship team. More than 70% of respondents reported implementation of biosimilars, formulary management, and dose rounding as oncology stewardship initiatives in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Frequently cited barriers to oncology stewardship included lack of clinical pharmacist availability (74%), lack of oncology stewardship training (62%), lack of physician/provider buy-in (32%), and lack of cost-saving metrics (33%). Only 6.6% of survey respondents reported their organization had defined "value in oncology." Lack of a formalized stewardship program was most often cited (77%) as the rationale for not defining value.

Conclusions: Less than one-third of respondents have established oncology stewardship programs; however, most are providing oncology stewardship practices. This manuscript serves as a call to action for stakeholders to work together to formalize oncology stewardship programs that optimize value, quality, and safety for patients with cancer.