首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy最新文献

英文 中文
Peer Review Questions & Answers: How? Part III: Writing the Reviewer Report. 同行评议问答:怎么做?第三部分:撰写审稿人报告。
IF 1.1 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-28 DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2023.2271817
Laura Meyer-Junco
{"title":"Peer Review Questions & Answers: How? Part III: Writing the Reviewer Report.","authors":"Laura Meyer-Junco","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2271817","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2271817","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50158197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mpox Pain Management and Topical Agents. m痘疼痛管理和局部药物。
IF 1.1 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-28 DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2023.2276930
Hinpetch Daungsupawong, Viroj Wiwanitkit
{"title":"Mpox Pain Management and Topical Agents.","authors":"Hinpetch Daungsupawong, Viroj Wiwanitkit","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2276930","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2276930","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138445042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing Post-operative Opioid Consumption before and after a Patient-Controlled Analgesia Shortage: A Re-evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness. 比较患者自控镇痛短缺前后的术后阿片类药物消耗:安全性和有效性的再评估。
IF 1.1 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-05 DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2023.2250334
Lena Zoma, Renee Alexander Paxton, Michelle Dehoorne, Christopher Giuliano

This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare post-surgical opioid consumption before and after a PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) shortage. The study evaluated patients who received PCA vs. nurse-administered opioid analgesia (non-PCA). Two hundred and twenty-four patients ≥18 years who were initiated on analgesia within 24 h of surgery were included. The primary outcome was opioid consumption in average daily oral morphine milliequivalents (MME). The results showed that patients in the PCA group had increased MME consumption (162 ± 100.4 vs. 70.7 ± 52.8, p < 0.01), increased length of hospital stay (4.2 vs. 3.2 days, p < 0.01), and increased frequency of nausea (33 vs. 17.9%, p < 0.01). After controlling for confounding factors, the PCA group utilized significantly more opioids (84.6 MME/day, p < 0.01) than the non-PCA group. There was no difference in pain AUC/T (0.19 ± 0.07 vs. 0.21 ± 0.08, p = 0.07) and average opioid prescribing upon discharge (150 [77.5-360] vs. 90 [77.5-400], p = 0.64) between the PCA group and non-PCA group, respectively. These results question the routine use of PCA in post-operative patients due to the increased risk of opioid consumption, longer length of hospital stay, and higher incidence of nausea.

这项回顾性队列研究旨在比较PCA(患者自控镇痛)短缺前后的术后阿片类药物消耗。该研究评估了接受PCA与护士给药阿片类镇痛(非PCA)的患者。纳入24例手术后24小时内开始镇痛的≥18岁患者。主要终点是平均每日口服吗啡毫当量(MME)的阿片类药物消耗。结果显示,PCA组患者的MME消耗增加(162±100.4比70.7±52.8,p vs。3.2天,p vs。17.9%, p p vs。分别为(0.21±0.08,p = 0.07)和(150 [77.5-360]vs. 90 [77.5-400], p = 0.64)。由于阿片类药物消耗风险增加、住院时间延长和恶心发生率增加,这些结果对术后患者常规使用PCA提出了质疑。
{"title":"Comparing Post-operative Opioid Consumption before and after a Patient-Controlled Analgesia Shortage: A Re-evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness.","authors":"Lena Zoma, Renee Alexander Paxton, Michelle Dehoorne, Christopher Giuliano","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2250334","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2250334","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare post-surgical opioid consumption before and after a PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) shortage. The study evaluated patients who received PCA <i>vs.</i> nurse-administered opioid analgesia (non-PCA). Two hundred and twenty-four patients ≥18 years who were initiated on analgesia within 24 h of surgery were included. The primary outcome was opioid consumption in average daily oral morphine milliequivalents (MME). The results showed that patients in the PCA group had increased MME consumption (162 ± 100.4 <i>vs.</i> 70.7 ± 52.8, <i>p</i> < 0.01), increased length of hospital stay (4.2 <i>vs.</i> 3.2 days, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and increased frequency of nausea (33 <i>vs.</i> 17.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). After controlling for confounding factors, the PCA group utilized significantly more opioids (84.6 MME/day, <i>p</i> < 0.01) than the non-PCA group. There was no difference in pain AUC/T (0.19 ± 0.07 <i>vs.</i> 0.21 ± 0.08, <i>p</i> = 0.07) and average opioid prescribing upon discharge (150 [77.5-360] <i>vs.</i> 90 [77.5-400], <i>p</i> = 0.64) between the PCA group and non-PCA group, respectively. These results question the routine use of PCA in post-operative patients due to the increased risk of opioid consumption, longer length of hospital stay, and higher incidence of nausea.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10160704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Potential Drug Interactions in Terminally-Ill Cancer Patients, a Report from the Middle East. 一份来自中东的癌症晚期患者的潜在药物相互作用报告。
IF 1.1 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2023.2253223
Hamed Mahzoni, Erfan Naghsh, Mehran Sharifi, Ayda Moghaddas, Mahnaz Momenzadeh, Azadeh Moghaddas

This study aims to evaluate the epidemiology of potential drug interactions in terminally-ill cancer patients receiving exclusively supportive care. In this cross-sectional study, during a 6-month follow-up, we considered the medical record of terminally-ill cancer patients referred to palliative care at the cancer center in Isfahan, Iran. Potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were assessed by Lexi-Interact ver.1.1 online software. During the study period, 133 terminally-ill cancer patients were recruited. We detected 1678 DDIs with moderate or major severity levels. Among them, 330, 219, 32, 1075, and 51 interactions were categorized in B, C, D, and X drug interactions categories, respectively. One hundred and twenty-two patients (91.73%) encountered at least one potential drug-drug interaction during the end of life care. Mechanistically, most drug-drug interactions (64.5%) were pharmacodynamics. The most frequent pharmacological class of drugs responsible for DDIs were quetiapine (91 cases), oxycodone (87 cases), and sertraline (55 cases). Interaction between oxycodone and sertraline was found to be in the top 10 detected DDIs (13.7%). Our results showed that potentially moderate or major drug-drug interactions often occur among terminally-ill cancer patients and the clinical significance of DDIs should be considered meticulously in the palliative care cancer setting.

本研究旨在评估接受独家支持治疗的晚期癌症患者潜在药物相互作用的流行病学。在这项横断面研究中,在为期6个月的随访中,我们考虑了在伊朗伊斯法罕癌症中心接受姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者的医疗记录。采用Lexi-Interact ver.1.1在线软件评估潜在药物-药物相互作用(ddi)。在研究期间,133名晚期癌症患者被招募。我们检测到1678例中度或重度ddi。其中,330例、219例、32例、1075例和51例相互作用分别被归为B类、C类、D类和X类药物相互作用。122名患者(91.73%)在临终关怀期间至少遇到一种潜在的药物-药物相互作用。机制上,大多数药物-药物相互作用(64.5%)为药效学相互作用。导致ddi最常见的药物是喹硫平(91例)、羟考酮(87例)和舍曲林(55例)。羟考酮与舍曲林的相互作用是检测到的ddi前10位(13.7%)。我们的研究结果表明,晚期癌症患者经常发生潜在的中度或严重的药物-药物相互作用,在姑息治疗癌症环境中,ddi的临床意义应该被仔细考虑。
{"title":"Potential Drug Interactions in Terminally-Ill Cancer Patients, a Report from the Middle East.","authors":"Hamed Mahzoni, Erfan Naghsh, Mehran Sharifi, Ayda Moghaddas, Mahnaz Momenzadeh, Azadeh Moghaddas","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2253223","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2253223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to evaluate the epidemiology of potential drug interactions in terminally-ill cancer patients receiving exclusively supportive care. In this cross-sectional study, during a 6-month follow-up, we considered the medical record of terminally-ill cancer patients referred to palliative care at the cancer center in Isfahan, Iran. Potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were assessed by Lexi-Interact ver.1.1 online software. During the study period, 133 terminally-ill cancer patients were recruited. We detected 1678 DDIs with moderate or major severity levels. Among them, 330, 219, 32, 1075, and 51 interactions were categorized in B, C, D, and X drug interactions categories, respectively. One hundred and twenty-two patients (91.73%) encountered at least one potential drug-drug interaction during the end of life care. Mechanistically, most drug-drug interactions (64.5%) were pharmacodynamics. The most frequent pharmacological class of drugs responsible for DDIs were quetiapine (91 cases), oxycodone (87 cases), and sertraline (55 cases). Interaction between oxycodone and sertraline was found to be in the top 10 detected DDIs (13.7%). Our results showed that potentially moderate or major drug-drug interactions often occur among terminally-ill cancer patients and the clinical significance of DDIs should be considered meticulously in the palliative care cancer setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10243800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systematic Review on Barriers to Access Opioid Analgesics for Cancer Pain Management from the Health Worker Perspective. 从卫生工作者的角度对癌症疼痛管理阿片类镇痛药获取障碍的系统评价。
IF 1.1 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-28 DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2023.2257674
Josephine Fleckner, Katherine Pettus, Nandini Vallath, Tania Pastrana

The increasing incidence of oncological diseases creates a corresponding need for effective cancer pain management (CPM). The lack of access to and availability of opioid analgesics in most countries leads to avoidable suffering. This systematic review aims to identify barriers to accessing opioids, as described in literature that reflects the perspective of health-care workers. A systematic literature search was performed in May 2018 and updated in December 2022, using search terms related to "cancer pain," "opioid analgesics," "access," and "health-care personnel." Medline, Embase, and PsycInfo were searched. Forty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Principal barriers that have hindered licit access to medical opioids include regulatory, systemic, educational, patient-related, and societal. These barriers are rooted in a lack of adequate education about the importance and significance of appropriate CPM. Barriers were often mutually reinforcing. A interdisciplinary approach is required to overcome them. This research contributes to the important global health issue of unduly limited access to opioid analgesics. It provides interdisciplinary solutions in terms of guidelines to ensure that governments respect, protect, and fulfill the right to the highest attainable standard of health, which includes the relief of severe pain.

肿瘤疾病的发病率不断增加,相应地需要有效的癌症疼痛管理(CPM)。大多数国家缺乏阿片类止痛药的获取和供应,导致了本可避免的痛苦。这项系统综述旨在确定获取阿片类药物的障碍,正如反映医护人员观点的文献所述。2018年5月进行了系统文献检索,并于2022年12月更新,检索词与“癌症疼痛”、“阿片类镇痛药”、“访问”和“医护人员”有关。检索了Medline、Embase和PsycInfo。四十二项研究符合纳入标准。阻碍合法获得医疗阿片类药物的主要障碍包括监管、系统、教育、患者相关和社会。这些障碍的根源在于缺乏关于适当CPM的重要性和重要性的充分教育。障碍往往是相辅相成的。需要采取跨学科的方法来克服这些问题。这项研究有助于解决阿片类止痛药获取途径过度有限这一重要的全球健康问题。它在指导方针方面提供了跨学科的解决方案,以确保政府尊重、保护和履行可达到的最高健康标准的权利,其中包括减轻严重疼痛。
{"title":"Systematic Review on Barriers to Access Opioid Analgesics for Cancer Pain Management from the Health Worker Perspective.","authors":"Josephine Fleckner, Katherine Pettus, Nandini Vallath, Tania Pastrana","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2257674","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2257674","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing incidence of oncological diseases creates a corresponding need for effective cancer pain management (CPM). The lack of access to and availability of opioid analgesics in most countries leads to avoidable suffering. This systematic review aims to identify barriers to accessing opioids, as described in literature that reflects the perspective of health-care workers. A systematic literature search was performed in May 2018 and updated in December 2022, using search terms related to \"cancer pain,\" \"opioid analgesics,\" \"access,\" and \"health-care personnel.\" Medline, Embase, and PsycInfo were searched. Forty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Principal barriers that have hindered licit access to medical opioids include regulatory, systemic, educational, patient-related, and societal. These barriers are rooted in a lack of adequate education about the importance and significance of appropriate CPM. Barriers were often mutually reinforcing. A interdisciplinary approach is required to overcome them. This research contributes to the important global health issue of unduly limited access to opioid analgesics. It provides interdisciplinary solutions in terms of guidelines to ensure that governments respect, protect, and fulfill the right to the highest attainable standard of health, which includes the relief of severe pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41122722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Atypical Withdrawal Symptoms after Abrupt Tramadol Discontinuation: A Case Report. 曲马多突然停药后的非典型戒断症状:一例报告。
IF 1.1 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-28 DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2023.2261913
Caylee Sams, Serena Cheng

Tramadol is a commonly utilized analgesic in the United States. One common misconception is that tramadol is safer than other opioid medications, or less likely to cause physical dependence. Given these misconceptions, the likelihood of patients experiencing withdrawal after discontinuation may be commonly overlooked as well. A 68-year old female patient with fibromyalgia was referred to a clinical pharmacy pain clinic for medication management. The patient was evaluated one month after abrupt discontinuation of tramadol 50 mg every 6 h for at least 10 years of use. She reports concerning symptoms of significant mucus production, fullness in chest and soreness in neck. Although tramadol is a Schedule IV Controlled Substance the risk of physical dependence and likelihood of patients experiencing withdrawal symptoms after abrupt cessation should not be diminished. Tramadol should not be considered a "safer" opioid therapy without potential of classic or atypical withdrawal symptoms, as well as risk of abuse, misuse or addiction.

曲马多是美国常用的止痛药。一个常见的误解是,曲马多比其他阿片类药物更安全,或者不太可能引起身体依赖。鉴于这些误解,患者在停药后出现戒断症状的可能性通常也会被忽视。一名患有纤维肌痛的68岁女性患者被转诊到临床药房疼痛诊所进行药物管理。患者在曲马多50突然停药一个月后接受评估 mg每6 h至少10 使用年限。她报告了大量粘液分泌、胸部胀满和颈部酸痛的症状。尽管曲马多是附表四管制物质,但不应降低患者突然停止服用后出现身体依赖性和戒断症状的可能性。曲马多不应被视为一种“更安全”的阿片类药物治疗,而不会出现典型或非典型的戒断症状,以及滥用、误用或成瘾的风险。
{"title":"Atypical Withdrawal Symptoms after Abrupt Tramadol Discontinuation: A Case Report.","authors":"Caylee Sams, Serena Cheng","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2261913","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2261913","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tramadol is a commonly utilized analgesic in the United States. One common misconception is that tramadol is safer than other opioid medications, or less likely to cause physical dependence. Given these misconceptions, the likelihood of patients experiencing withdrawal after discontinuation may be commonly overlooked as well. A 68-year old female patient with fibromyalgia was referred to a clinical pharmacy pain clinic for medication management. The patient was evaluated one month after abrupt discontinuation of tramadol 50 mg every 6 h for at least 10 years of use. She reports concerning symptoms of significant mucus production, fullness in chest and soreness in neck. Although tramadol is a Schedule IV Controlled Substance the risk of physical dependence and likelihood of patients experiencing withdrawal symptoms after abrupt cessation should not be diminished. Tramadol should not be considered a \"safer\" opioid therapy without potential of classic or atypical withdrawal symptoms, as well as risk of abuse, misuse or addiction.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41105901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of Health Coaching in Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacy Practice. 健康指导在疼痛和姑息治疗药学实践中的作用。
IF 1.1 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2023.2268039
Lee A Kral

Whole-person care is essential in the management of patients with chronic pain and serious illness. Pain, suffering, and comfort do not fall under typical chronic disease management and cannot be boxed nicely into algorithms of evidence-focused, biomarker-based goal achievement like hypertension or diabetes. Current therapies, including surgical, interventional, and analgesic modalities may be only marginally effective, and have brought with them questionable practices, high cost, and an opioid epidemic. Patient-focused goals are gaining favor, and exploration of methods to enhance this approach include health coaching. In the setting of pain management, this would include pain coaching. This commentary will highlight the role of health coaching in the setting of chronic disease and pain management, and the pharmacists' qualifications and potential contributions to health and pain coaching.

在管理慢性疼痛和严重疾病患者时,全人护理至关重要。疼痛、痛苦和舒适不属于典型的慢性病管理范畴,也不能很好地纳入以证据为中心、基于生物标志物的目标实现算法,如高血压或糖尿病。目前的治疗方法,包括手术、介入和镇痛方式,可能只是边际有效,并带来了可疑的做法、高昂的成本和阿片类药物的流行。以患者为中心的目标越来越受欢迎,探索加强这种方法的方法包括健康指导。在疼痛管理方面,这将包括疼痛辅导。本评论将强调健康指导在慢性病和疼痛管理中的作用,以及药剂师的资格和对健康和疼痛指导的潜在贡献。
{"title":"The Role of Health Coaching in Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacy Practice.","authors":"Lee A Kral","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2268039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2023.2268039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whole-person care is essential in the management of patients with chronic pain and serious illness. Pain, suffering, and comfort do not fall under typical chronic disease management and cannot be boxed nicely into algorithms of evidence-focused, biomarker-based goal achievement like hypertension or diabetes. Current therapies, including surgical, interventional, and analgesic modalities may be only marginally effective, and have brought with them questionable practices, high cost, and an opioid epidemic. Patient-focused goals are gaining favor, and exploration of methods to enhance this approach include health coaching. In the setting of pain management, this would include pain coaching. This commentary will highlight the role of health coaching in the setting of chronic disease and pain management, and the pharmacists' qualifications and potential contributions to health and pain coaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49678570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Accidental Administration of Mega-Dose-Morphine Intrathecally. 鞘内意外使用大剂量吗啡。
IF 1.1 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-14 DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2023.2219666
Evangelia Samara, Agathi Karakosta, Vasilios Tsionaras, Petros Tzimas
Dear Editor, Intrathecal opioid administration is a common practice in major abdominal surgery, to facilitate postoperative pain management and lower total opioid consumption (1). We report a case of accidental administration of mega-dose-morphine intrathecally. A 64-year-old patient of 84 kg weight and 172 cm height presented to the OR to undergo an elective sigmoidectomy due to malignancy. His medical record was significant for Paget’s disease under no medication. For his postoperative analgesia, an intrathecal administration of ropivacaine 15 mg and morphine 100 mcg in total volume of 3 ml was planned, using an atraumatic needle of 25 G. Immediately after, anesthesia induction was facilitated with propofol 2 mg/kg, fentanyl 250 mcg and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. The procedure lasted for two hours and was uneventful. Toward the end, medication syringes were checked prior to discard, to discover that, instead of 100 mcg, 1 mg of morphine had been administered due to wrong dilution. The standard practice is to dilute 1 ampule (10 mg) in 10 ml syringe and then aspirate 1 ml and perform a second dilution in another 10 ml syringe. In this case, the second dilution was omitted. The patient was easily recovered from anesthesia and transferred to PostAnesthesia Care Unit (PACU), where he was started on naloxone drip 0.5 mcg/kg/h, under monitoring and continuous O2 administration via nasal canula. 8 h later, he was transferred to general ward under close monitoring for 24 h. The analgesic result was excellent, with the patient reporting pain on Numerical Rate Scale (NRS) equal to 0 for the first 24 h, with the naloxone drip withdrawn afterwards. Notably, the patient did not experience any of the commonest opioid related adverse events, i.e., respiratory depression, somnolence and nausea (2). Similar intrathecal morphine doses have been described in the literature, followed by naloxone infusion, to override the adverse events of morphine. Rebel et al. have reported 10-fold higher doses of naloxone than the one used in our case, with sustained analgesic results (3). The combination of opioid agonist-antagonist has been used even per os, to alleviate the nausea and constipation in managing both acute and chronic pain (4). To conclude, incorrect dosage administration, attributed to human factor, is common. A thorough checking of the dugs must always precede their administration and local protocols to manage such an unfortunate event should be established.
{"title":"Accidental Administration of Mega-Dose-Morphine Intrathecally.","authors":"Evangelia Samara,&nbsp;Agathi Karakosta,&nbsp;Vasilios Tsionaras,&nbsp;Petros Tzimas","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2219666","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2219666","url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, Intrathecal opioid administration is a common practice in major abdominal surgery, to facilitate postoperative pain management and lower total opioid consumption (1). We report a case of accidental administration of mega-dose-morphine intrathecally. A 64-year-old patient of 84 kg weight and 172 cm height presented to the OR to undergo an elective sigmoidectomy due to malignancy. His medical record was significant for Paget’s disease under no medication. For his postoperative analgesia, an intrathecal administration of ropivacaine 15 mg and morphine 100 mcg in total volume of 3 ml was planned, using an atraumatic needle of 25 G. Immediately after, anesthesia induction was facilitated with propofol 2 mg/kg, fentanyl 250 mcg and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. The procedure lasted for two hours and was uneventful. Toward the end, medication syringes were checked prior to discard, to discover that, instead of 100 mcg, 1 mg of morphine had been administered due to wrong dilution. The standard practice is to dilute 1 ampule (10 mg) in 10 ml syringe and then aspirate 1 ml and perform a second dilution in another 10 ml syringe. In this case, the second dilution was omitted. The patient was easily recovered from anesthesia and transferred to PostAnesthesia Care Unit (PACU), where he was started on naloxone drip 0.5 mcg/kg/h, under monitoring and continuous O2 administration via nasal canula. 8 h later, he was transferred to general ward under close monitoring for 24 h. The analgesic result was excellent, with the patient reporting pain on Numerical Rate Scale (NRS) equal to 0 for the first 24 h, with the naloxone drip withdrawn afterwards. Notably, the patient did not experience any of the commonest opioid related adverse events, i.e., respiratory depression, somnolence and nausea (2). Similar intrathecal morphine doses have been described in the literature, followed by naloxone infusion, to override the adverse events of morphine. Rebel et al. have reported 10-fold higher doses of naloxone than the one used in our case, with sustained analgesic results (3). The combination of opioid agonist-antagonist has been used even per os, to alleviate the nausea and constipation in managing both acute and chronic pain (4). To conclude, incorrect dosage administration, attributed to human factor, is common. A thorough checking of the dugs must always precede their administration and local protocols to manage such an unfortunate event should be established.","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10140096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to Demarest et al. 对Demarest等人。
IF 1.1 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-19 DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2023.2201271
Jessica Otte, Robin Love
We read with interest the article “Comprehensive Diagnosis and Management of Malignant Bowel Obstruction: A Review” (1). Malignant bowel obstructions (MBO) are common in the palliative care context yet can be challenging to manage because of the sparse evidence base. Even though we must often practice with a paucity of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) to guide us, an understanding of pharmacology and the best available evidence can help us navigate. Unfortunately, the article by Demarest et al. did not capture common clinical controversies in palliative management of MBO, omitting some key contributions of evidence and did not disclose uncertainty where it is present. Several statements are at issue:
{"title":"Response to Demarest et al.","authors":"Jessica Otte,&nbsp;Robin Love","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2201271","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2201271","url":null,"abstract":"We read with interest the article “Comprehensive Diagnosis and Management of Malignant Bowel Obstruction: A Review” (1). Malignant bowel obstructions (MBO) are common in the palliative care context yet can be challenging to manage because of the sparse evidence base. Even though we must often practice with a paucity of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) to guide us, an understanding of pharmacology and the best available evidence can help us navigate. Unfortunately, the article by Demarest et al. did not capture common clinical controversies in palliative management of MBO, omitting some key contributions of evidence and did not disclose uncertainty where it is present. Several statements are at issue:","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10496127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Checking Each Other's Math: Is It Possible Without a Single Standard for Opioid Dose Equivalence? 检查彼此的数学:没有阿片类药物剂量当量的单一标准可能吗?
IF 1.1 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2023.2240303
Kyle P Edmonds, Rabia S Atayee
For the last decade or more, there has been a proliferation of guidance, policies, and protocols on opioid prescribing that rely on oral morphine equivalents (OME) or morphine equivalent daily doses (MEDD) (1–4). Almost exclusively, this guidance has presumed that OME calculations are standardized and predictable, while those of us who do the work of specialist palliative care on a daily basis know that not to be true. Some experts are encouraging us to dispense with the concept of “equianalgesia” altogether and instead adopt conversion tables as our primary clinical decision aides (5). Few studies have examined the safety and efficacy of opioid dosing decision aids. As such, the tool we use at University of California San Diego Health (6) is different from tools used at other institutions across the country or in widely utilized online calculators such as MD CalcTM. Given this fact, we teach our rotating learners that they should advocate for use of one equianalgesic tool at their institution, choosing a method of equianalgesic calculation that makes sense to them and stick with it. This may minimize intraand inter-tool variability in their clinical decisions and also facilitate direct comparison among colleagues/ teams using other decision tools. Results
{"title":"Checking Each Other's Math: Is It Possible Without a Single Standard for Opioid Dose Equivalence?","authors":"Kyle P Edmonds,&nbsp;Rabia S Atayee","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2240303","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2240303","url":null,"abstract":"For the last decade or more, there has been a proliferation of guidance, policies, and protocols on opioid prescribing that rely on oral morphine equivalents (OME) or morphine equivalent daily doses (MEDD) (1–4). Almost exclusively, this guidance has presumed that OME calculations are standardized and predictable, while those of us who do the work of specialist palliative care on a daily basis know that not to be true. Some experts are encouraging us to dispense with the concept of “equianalgesia” altogether and instead adopt conversion tables as our primary clinical decision aides (5). Few studies have examined the safety and efficacy of opioid dosing decision aids. As such, the tool we use at University of California San Diego Health (6) is different from tools used at other institutions across the country or in widely utilized online calculators such as MD CalcTM. Given this fact, we teach our rotating learners that they should advocate for use of one equianalgesic tool at their institution, choosing a method of equianalgesic calculation that makes sense to them and stick with it. This may minimize intraand inter-tool variability in their clinical decisions and also facilitate direct comparison among colleagues/ teams using other decision tools. Results","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10216041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1