Pub Date : 2025-12-27DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2025.2607541
Shannon Moriarty, Anna Dushenkov, Kathleen M Frey
Cancer patients frequently experience pain and depression, yet current guidelines address these conditions separately and do not recommend a single agent for concurrent management. Ketamine and its S-enantiomer esketamine, through N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonism and glutamate modulation, may offer dual benefit. This paper examined ten clinical studies published between 2018 and 2024 evaluating ketamine and esketamine for concurrent cancer-related pain and depression. Evidence was heterogeneous but promising. Two randomized controlled trials in post-surgical breast and cervical cancer patients demonstrated that intravenous (IV) esketamine and racemic ketamine improved both pain and depression, with esketamine showing greater, longer-lasting benefit. When pain was the primary outcome, results were mixed: IV esketamine provided dual benefit in one trial, whereas racemic ketamine produced variable or nonsignificant effects across IV, intranasal (IN), and oral routes. In depression-focused studies, IV and IN administration consistently improved mood, even without pain relief. Dose-response relationships were observed, with esketamine outperforming ketamine and higher IN dosing yielding stronger antidepressant effects. Adverse effects were generally mild and transient, though cardiovascular, urinary, and cognitive risks remain concerns. With rapid dual action, ketamine and esketamine may serve as valuable adjunctive therapies in palliative care. Further studies should clarify optimal dosing, route, and long-term safety.
癌症患者经常经历疼痛和抑郁,但目前的指南将这些情况分开处理,不推荐单一药物同时治疗。氯胺酮及其s -对映体艾氯胺酮通过n -甲基- d -天冬氨酸受体拮抗和谷氨酸调节,可能具有双重益处。本文分析了2018年至2024年间发表的10项临床研究,这些研究评估了氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮对癌症相关疼痛和抑郁的影响。证据各异,但很有希望。两项针对乳腺癌和宫颈癌术后患者的随机对照试验表明,静脉注射(IV)艾氯胺酮和外消旋氯胺酮可改善疼痛和抑郁,其中艾氯胺酮显示出更大、更持久的疗效。当疼痛是主要结局时,结果是混合的:静脉注射艾氯胺酮在一项试验中提供了双重益处,而外消旋氯胺酮在静脉注射、鼻内(in)和口服途径中产生可变或不显著的效果。在以抑郁症为重点的研究中,静脉注射和静脉注射可以持续改善情绪,即使没有缓解疼痛。剂量-反应关系被观察到,艾氯胺酮优于氯胺酮,高剂量的IN产生更强的抗抑郁作用。不良反应通常是轻微和短暂的,尽管心血管、泌尿和认知风险仍然值得关注。氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮具有快速的双重作用,可作为姑息治疗中有价值的辅助疗法。进一步的研究应阐明最佳剂量、途径和长期安全性。
{"title":"The Emerging Role of Ketamine and Esketamine in the Concurrent Management of Pain and Depression in Cancer Patients: Evidence and Implications for Practice.","authors":"Shannon Moriarty, Anna Dushenkov, Kathleen M Frey","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2607541","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2607541","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer patients frequently experience pain and depression, yet current guidelines address these conditions separately and do not recommend a single agent for concurrent management. Ketamine and its S-enantiomer esketamine, through N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonism and glutamate modulation, may offer dual benefit. This paper examined ten clinical studies published between 2018 and 2024 evaluating ketamine and esketamine for concurrent cancer-related pain and depression. Evidence was heterogeneous but promising. Two randomized controlled trials in post-surgical breast and cervical cancer patients demonstrated that intravenous (IV) esketamine and racemic ketamine improved both pain and depression, with esketamine showing greater, longer-lasting benefit. When pain was the primary outcome, results were mixed: IV esketamine provided dual benefit in one trial, whereas racemic ketamine produced variable or nonsignificant effects across IV, intranasal (IN), and oral routes. In depression-focused studies, IV and IN administration consistently improved mood, even without pain relief. Dose-response relationships were observed, with esketamine outperforming ketamine and higher IN dosing yielding stronger antidepressant effects. Adverse effects were generally mild and transient, though cardiovascular, urinary, and cognitive risks remain concerns. With rapid dual action, ketamine and esketamine may serve as valuable adjunctive therapies in palliative care. Further studies should clarify optimal dosing, route, and long-term safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145846761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-19DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2025.2606250
Elizabeth Stroeh, Brianna Jansma Vant Hul, Karly Blaalid
Previous studies have shown that pharmacist involvement in inpatient palliative care programs is associated with lower daily cost expenditures and fewer patients with subsequent hospitalizations or urgent care visits. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of a new inpatient pain and palliative pharmacy service line staffed by a first year pharmacist resident. In this prospective, single center pilot study, a PGY1 pharmacy resident reviewed pain medications for hospitalized patients from February 3, 2025 through February 28, 2025, and joined with the interdisciplinary palliative care team attending daily huddle. The pharmacist resident reviewed 571 patients and made 79 interventions during the pilot duration (average 4.3 interventions per day). Most common intervention types included discontinuation of a medication, adding an adjunct medication, or dose adjustment. This study found that a dedicated pain and palliative care pharmacist resident integrated within the interdisciplinary palliative care team can make diverse interventions and recommendations to optimize pain and symptom management for hospitalized patients. Depending on the size of the medical center, the scope of such a position may need to be expanded to justify a full FTE pain and palliative pharmacist position.
{"title":"Strategic Integration of EMR Tools in a Pharmacist-Led Palliative Care Pilot Program to Improve Workflow Efficiency.","authors":"Elizabeth Stroeh, Brianna Jansma Vant Hul, Karly Blaalid","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2606250","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2606250","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have shown that pharmacist involvement in inpatient palliative care programs is associated with lower daily cost expenditures and fewer patients with subsequent hospitalizations or urgent care visits. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of a new inpatient pain and palliative pharmacy service line staffed by a first year pharmacist resident. In this prospective, single center pilot study, a PGY1 pharmacy resident reviewed pain medications for hospitalized patients from February 3, 2025 through February 28, 2025, and joined with the interdisciplinary palliative care team attending daily huddle. The pharmacist resident reviewed 571 patients and made 79 interventions during the pilot duration (average 4.3 interventions per day). Most common intervention types included discontinuation of a medication, adding an adjunct medication, or dose adjustment. This study found that a dedicated pain and palliative care pharmacist resident integrated within the interdisciplinary palliative care team can make diverse interventions and recommendations to optimize pain and symptom management for hospitalized patients. Depending on the size of the medical center, the scope of such a position may need to be expanded to justify a full FTE pain and palliative pharmacist position.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145794281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This retrospective study evaluated real-world use of hospital-compounded oral ketamine in fibromyalgia patients following a course of intravenous (IV) ketamine induction. Fifty-three patients with fibromyalgia first underwent a 3-day IV ketamine infusion (1.44 mg/kg/day) in hospital and then transitioned to oral ketamine, compounded by the hospital pharmacy. Patients were categorized as complete, partial, or non-responders based on clinical outcomes after 3 months. Of the 53 patients, 41.5% were complete responders, 15% partial responders, and 43.5% non-responders. Complete responders continued oral ketamine for a mean of 15.6 months. Overall, 58.5% discontinued ketamine (23 patients within 3 months, 8 after more prolonged use), most commonly due to lack of efficacy (12 patients) or side effects (11 patients). Side effects were generally mild; significant adverse events occurred in only two patients (3.8%: one with hypertension, one with atrial fibrillation), and one patient had a isolated elevation in a liver enzyme (gamma-GT). These findings suggest sequential IV induction followed by oral ketamine maintenance can be a safe, potentially effective off-label therapy for some fibromyalgia patients refractory to standard treatments. The tolerability and sustained use observed in responders highlight the need for further prospective studies to clarify ketamine's role in chronic fibromyalgia pain management.
{"title":"Hospital-Compounded Oral Ketamine as Maintenance Therapy After Intravenous Induction for Fibromyalgia: A Retrospective Real-World Study, Off-Label Pharmacotherapy.","authors":"Erwan Treillet, Yacine Hadjiat, Gisèle Pickering, Marie Hélène Delmotte, Jacqueline Dubois, Laure Serresse","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2596159","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2596159","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective study evaluated real-world use of hospital-compounded oral ketamine in fibromyalgia patients following a course of intravenous (IV) ketamine induction. Fifty-three patients with fibromyalgia first underwent a 3-day IV ketamine infusion (1.44 mg/kg/day) in hospital and then transitioned to oral ketamine, compounded by the hospital pharmacy. Patients were categorized as complete, partial, or non-responders based on clinical outcomes after 3 months. Of the 53 patients, 41.5% were complete responders, 15% partial responders, and 43.5% non-responders. Complete responders continued oral ketamine for a mean of 15.6 months. Overall, 58.5% discontinued ketamine (23 patients within 3 months, 8 after more prolonged use), most commonly due to lack of efficacy (12 patients) or side effects (11 patients). Side effects were generally mild; significant adverse events occurred in only two patients (3.8%: one with hypertension, one with atrial fibrillation), and one patient had a isolated elevation in a liver enzyme (gamma-GT). These findings suggest sequential IV induction followed by oral ketamine maintenance can be a safe, potentially effective off-label therapy for some fibromyalgia patients refractory to standard treatments. The tolerability and sustained use observed in responders highlight the need for further prospective studies to clarify ketamine's role in chronic fibromyalgia pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145774671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2025.2600075
Anthony Benjamín Ayala-Inga, Erik Saúl Ayala-Inga, Carlos Alberto Dávila-Hernandez
Kounis syndrome is an under-recognized condition characterized by the simultaneous occurrence of acute coronary syndrome and hypersensitivity reactions. While opioids are known triggers, tramadol-induced Kounis syndrome is extremely rare. A 49-year-old woman with a history of allergy to dimenhydrinate and chronic low back pain developed anaphylactic shock 4 min after receiving 50 mg of subcutaneous tramadol. She developed with dyspnea, glottic edema, muscle rigidity, chest pain, and hypotension. After stabilization with epinephrine, corticosteroids, antihistamines, fluids, and vasopressors, elevated cardiac biomarkers were detected. Electrocardiograms and echocardiography were normal. Coronary CT and invasive angiography revealed no obstructive coronary artery disease. A diagnosis of Kounis syndrome was established. This case highlights the importance of considering Kounis syndrome in patients presenting with anaphylaxis and chest pain, even in the absence of ECG changes. Early hemodynamic stabilization followed by cardiac evaluation is essential for timely diagnosis and management.
{"title":"Acute Kounis Syndrome Induced by Tramadol: A Case Report.","authors":"Anthony Benjamín Ayala-Inga, Erik Saúl Ayala-Inga, Carlos Alberto Dávila-Hernandez","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2600075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2600075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kounis syndrome is an under-recognized condition characterized by the simultaneous occurrence of acute coronary syndrome and hypersensitivity reactions. While opioids are known triggers, tramadol-induced Kounis syndrome is extremely rare. A 49-year-old woman with a history of allergy to dimenhydrinate and chronic low back pain developed anaphylactic shock 4 min after receiving 50 mg of subcutaneous tramadol. She developed with dyspnea, glottic edema, muscle rigidity, chest pain, and hypotension. After stabilization with epinephrine, corticosteroids, antihistamines, fluids, and vasopressors, elevated cardiac biomarkers were detected. Electrocardiograms and echocardiography were normal. Coronary CT and invasive angiography revealed no obstructive coronary artery disease. A diagnosis of Kounis syndrome was established. This case highlights the importance of considering Kounis syndrome in patients presenting with anaphylaxis and chest pain, even in the absence of ECG changes. Early hemodynamic stabilization followed by cardiac evaluation is essential for timely diagnosis and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145768352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-13DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2025.2598012
Sarah Setoudeh, Rebecca Hoss, Aletha Loeb, Christian James Squires, Alicia Agnoli, Mariya Kotova
Buprenorphine is a mixed agonist-antagonist, safer for long-term use compared to full agonist opioids. There is no literature to describe utilization of flexible buprenorphine dosing regimens in the chronic pain population. This was a retrospective single center, observational study. Inclusion criteria were age 18 and older, diagnosis of chronic pain, and prescribed buprenorphine. Patients with a diagnosis of opioid use disorder (OUD) were excluded. Buprenorphine regimens analyzed included: scheduled buprenorphine, scheduled plus as needed (PRN) buprenorphine, PRN buprenorphine alone, and scheduled buprenorphine plus PRN full µ-opioid agonist. The primary outcome was the percent of patients on each buprenorphine regimen. The secondary outcome was duration of buprenorphine therapy. Overall, 691 patients were reviewed, with 401 meeting inclusion criteria. Scheduled buprenorphine was prescribed to 340 patients (84.4%), while 37 patients (9.2%) were prescribed scheduled plus PRN buprenorphine. Patients exposed to flexible dosing remained on treatment longer than those on scheduled buprenorphine alone (HR 3.50, CI 2.07-5.92, NNT 9.0). Flexible buprenorphine dosing was utilized for chronic pain. Patients on scheduled plus PRN buprenorphine were on treatment longer than those on scheduled buprenorphine alone. Scheduled plus PRN buprenorphine can be considered for patients with chronic pain.
丁丙诺啡是一种混合激动剂-拮抗剂,与完全激动剂阿片类药物相比,长期使用更安全。没有文献描述在慢性疼痛人群中灵活的丁丙诺啡剂量方案的使用。这是一项回顾性单中心观察性研究。纳入标准为年龄18岁及以上,诊断为慢性疼痛,并处方丁丙诺啡。排除诊断为阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的患者。丁丙诺啡方案分析包括:常规丁丙诺啡、常规按需加丁丙诺啡、常规丁丙诺啡单独加PRN丁丙诺啡、常规丁丙诺啡加PRN全微阿片激动剂。主要结果是每个丁丙诺啡方案的患者百分比。次要终点是丁丙诺啡治疗的持续时间。总的来说,691例患者被审查,其中401例符合纳入标准。340例(84.4%)患者服用了常规丁丙诺啡,37例(9.2%)患者服用了常规丁丙诺啡加PRN丁丙诺啡。接受灵活剂量治疗的患者比接受单独丁丙诺啡治疗的患者持续时间更长(HR 3.50, CI 2.07-5.92, NNT 9.0)。丁丙诺啡灵活剂量用于慢性疼痛。计划加PRN丁丙诺啡的患者比单独计划丁丙诺啡的患者治疗时间更长。慢性疼痛患者可考虑定期加PRN丁丙诺啡。
{"title":"Evaluation of Flexible Buprenorphine Dosing in Patients with Chronic Pain.","authors":"Sarah Setoudeh, Rebecca Hoss, Aletha Loeb, Christian James Squires, Alicia Agnoli, Mariya Kotova","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2598012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2598012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Buprenorphine is a mixed agonist-antagonist, safer for long-term use compared to full agonist opioids. There is no literature to describe utilization of flexible buprenorphine dosing regimens in the chronic pain population. This was a retrospective single center, observational study. Inclusion criteria were age 18 and older, diagnosis of chronic pain, and prescribed buprenorphine. Patients with a diagnosis of opioid use disorder (OUD) were excluded. Buprenorphine regimens analyzed included: scheduled buprenorphine, scheduled plus as needed (PRN) buprenorphine, PRN buprenorphine alone, and scheduled buprenorphine plus PRN full µ-opioid agonist. The primary outcome was the percent of patients on each buprenorphine regimen. The secondary outcome was duration of buprenorphine therapy. Overall, 691 patients were reviewed, with 401 meeting inclusion criteria. Scheduled buprenorphine was prescribed to 340 patients (84.4%), while 37 patients (9.2%) were prescribed scheduled plus PRN buprenorphine. Patients exposed to flexible dosing remained on treatment longer than those on scheduled buprenorphine alone (HR 3.50, CI 2.07-5.92, NNT 9.0). Flexible buprenorphine dosing was utilized for chronic pain. Patients on scheduled plus PRN buprenorphine were on treatment longer than those on scheduled buprenorphine alone. Scheduled plus PRN buprenorphine can be considered for patients with chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145751839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2025.2600077
A Alcántara Montero
{"title":"Innovation Versus Consolidation: Critical Reflections on Suzetrigine and the Tramadol-Celecoxib Co-Crystal.","authors":"A Alcántara Montero","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2600077","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2600077","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145743140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-11DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2025.2599367
Doreen Kher Lee Kiu, Kian Yee Yap, Teck Long King, Pei Jye Voon
Cancer pain is one of the most frequent and distressing symptoms experienced by patients and remains commonly undertreated. Understanding healthcare provider-related barriers is essential to improving pain management practices. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among healthcare providers in Hospital Umum Sarawak using the Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP) questionnaire to assess knowledge and attitudes toward pain management. A total of 136 healthcare providers participated, with an overall mean KASRP score of 60.26%. Doctors achieved the highest mean score (67.69%), followed by pharmacists (62.56%) and nurses (47.69%), with statistically significant interprofessional differences. As a minimum score of 80% is considered adequate, the findings indicate substantial gaps in knowledge and attitude across all groups. Variability in pain management education within professional curricula may explain these differences. Although education and training programs were associated with improved knowledge, their effectiveness varied, highlighting the need for regular, high-quality, and targeted training. Adequate knowledge alone does not ensure high-quality pain management, as inadequate pain assessment remains a persistent barrier. Regular audits, continuous education, and tailored training initiatives are crucial to overcome healthcare provider-related barriers and enhance the quality of cancer pain management.
{"title":"The Journey Toward Effective Pain Management: Tackling the Healthcare Providers Related Barriers.","authors":"Doreen Kher Lee Kiu, Kian Yee Yap, Teck Long King, Pei Jye Voon","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2599367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2599367","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer pain is one of the most frequent and distressing symptoms experienced by patients and remains commonly undertreated. Understanding healthcare provider-related barriers is essential to improving pain management practices. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among healthcare providers in Hospital Umum Sarawak using the Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP) questionnaire to assess knowledge and attitudes toward pain management. A total of 136 healthcare providers participated, with an overall mean KASRP score of 60.26%. Doctors achieved the highest mean score (67.69%), followed by pharmacists (62.56%) and nurses (47.69%), with statistically significant interprofessional differences. As a minimum score of 80% is considered adequate, the findings indicate substantial gaps in knowledge and attitude across all groups. Variability in pain management education within professional curricula may explain these differences. Although education and training programs were associated with improved knowledge, their effectiveness varied, highlighting the need for regular, high-quality, and targeted training. Adequate knowledge alone does not ensure high-quality pain management, as inadequate pain assessment remains a persistent barrier. Regular audits, continuous education, and tailored training initiatives are crucial to overcome healthcare provider-related barriers and enhance the quality of cancer pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145743071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-11DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2025.2599362
Morgan Streett, Michael Chandler, Lisa Luciani, Anne Cetto, Jennifer Kathol, Jacob Painter
This single-center, retrospective chart review aims to estimate the incidence of opioid-induced hypogonadism (OIH) among chronic pain patients treated with long-term opioid therapy and determine whether the incidence differs between patients receiving buprenorphine versus those receiving full-agonist opioid agents. The primary endpoint was a composite of plasma testosterone less than 300 ng/dL, initiation of medications for testosterone replacement therapy or erectile dysfunction (ED), or a new diagnosis of ED or hypogonadism. Adult male Veterans were included if they received at least 90 d' supply of an opioid during the study period with a preceding 90-d opioid-free interval. Forty-five patients were included in the buprenorphine group and 55 in the full-agonist opioid group. There was no significant difference between groups in baseline characteristics. Fewer patients in the buprenorphine group met the primary composite endpoint as compared to the full-agonist opioid group (13.3% vs. 29.1%, p = 0.058), and patients in the buprenorphine group had fewer diagnoses of ED or hypogonadism post-treatment initiation (0% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.013). These findings support the use of buprenorphine as a treatment option when endocrine-related side effects are a concern.
{"title":"Effect of Long-Term Opioid Therapy on Sexual Dysfunction in Pain Patients.","authors":"Morgan Streett, Michael Chandler, Lisa Luciani, Anne Cetto, Jennifer Kathol, Jacob Painter","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2599362","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2599362","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This single-center, retrospective chart review aims to estimate the incidence of opioid-induced hypogonadism (OIH) among chronic pain patients treated with long-term opioid therapy and determine whether the incidence differs between patients receiving buprenorphine versus those receiving full-agonist opioid agents. The primary endpoint was a composite of plasma testosterone less than 300 ng/dL, initiation of medications for testosterone replacement therapy or erectile dysfunction (ED), or a new diagnosis of ED or hypogonadism. Adult male Veterans were included if they received at least 90 d' supply of an opioid during the study period with a preceding 90-d opioid-free interval. Forty-five patients were included in the buprenorphine group and 55 in the full-agonist opioid group. There was no significant difference between groups in baseline characteristics. Fewer patients in the buprenorphine group met the primary composite endpoint as compared to the full-agonist opioid group (13.3% vs. 29.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.058), and patients in the buprenorphine group had fewer diagnoses of ED or hypogonadism post-treatment initiation (0% vs. 12.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.013). These findings support the use of buprenorphine as a treatment option when endocrine-related side effects are a concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145743106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-11DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2025.2600074
Zhaohui Su
{"title":"Surprises in Our Favor.","authors":"Zhaohui Su","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2600074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2600074","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145724084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2025.2599368
Saksham Tyagi, Neha, Nishant Gaur, Nitin Kumar
Lower back pain (LBP) poses a significant health challenge globally, particularly within the Indian community. This review article synthesizes current knowledge on the epidemiology, risk factors, and culturally tailored interventions for LBP in India. Drawing from an extensive literature review and analysis of 20 surveys, we elucidate the complex interplay between lifestyle choices, occupational factors, and poor posture as primary contributors to chronic LBP. Importantly, our findings reveal a notable disparity in LBP prevalence, with rural women experiencing a disproportionately high burden attributed to stress and the demanding nature of household chores. Addressing this issue necessitates the development of interventions sensitive to cultural nuances and socioeconomic contexts. Collaborative efforts involving healthcare professionals, policymakers, and community stakeholders are paramount to implementing effective strategies for LBP management and prevention. By empowering individuals, particularly vulnerable populations like rural women, with the necessary tools and resources, we can strive toward alleviating the burden of chronic LBP within the Indian community. This manuscript contributes to the body of knowledge by offering insights into the unique challenges and opportunities for addressing LBP in India, ultimately aiming to enhance the overall quality of life and well-being of all members of society.
{"title":"Exploring the Role of Lower Back Pain in the Indian Community: A Comprehensive Review of Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Culturally Tailored Interventions.","authors":"Saksham Tyagi, Neha, Nishant Gaur, Nitin Kumar","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2599368","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2599368","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lower back pain (LBP) poses a significant health challenge globally, particularly within the Indian community. This review article synthesizes current knowledge on the epidemiology, risk factors, and culturally tailored interventions for LBP in India. Drawing from an extensive literature review and analysis of 20 surveys, we elucidate the complex interplay between lifestyle choices, occupational factors, and poor posture as primary contributors to chronic LBP. Importantly, our findings reveal a notable disparity in LBP prevalence, with rural women experiencing a disproportionately high burden attributed to stress and the demanding nature of household chores. Addressing this issue necessitates the development of interventions sensitive to cultural nuances and socioeconomic contexts. Collaborative efforts involving healthcare professionals, policymakers, and community stakeholders are paramount to implementing effective strategies for LBP management and prevention. By empowering individuals, particularly vulnerable populations like rural women, with the necessary tools and resources, we can strive toward alleviating the burden of chronic LBP within the Indian community. This manuscript contributes to the body of knowledge by offering insights into the unique challenges and opportunities for addressing LBP in India, ultimately aiming to enhance the overall quality of life and well-being of all members of society.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}