首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Nuclear Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in Patients with Metastatic, Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors: Interim Analysis of a Prospective Bicenter Study. 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11和68Ga-DOTATE PET/CT在转移性、分化良好的神经内分泌肿瘤患者中的头对头比较:一项前瞻性双中心研究的中期分析。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264890
Zefang Lin, Wenjia Zhu, Jiaying Zhang, Weibing Miao, Shaobo Yao, Li Huo

The current study aimed to compare 68Ga-NODAGA-Cpa-cyclo(d-Cys-amino-Phe-hydroorotic acid-d-4-amino-Phe(carbamoyl)-Lys-Thr-Cys)-d-Tyr-NH2 (JR11) and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with metastatic, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Methods: A prospective bicenter study aimed at enrolling 100 patients with histologically proven, metastatic or unresectable, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors was conducted. The first 48 patients represented the study cohort. Each patient received 68Ga-DOTATATE on the first day and 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 on the second day. Whole-body PET/CT scans were performed at 40-60 min after injection. Normal-organ uptake, lesion numbers, lesion uptake, and sensitivity were compared. The potential impact on clinical management was also determined. Results: Overall, 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 demonstrated lower background uptake in normal organs. Compared with 68Ga-DOTATATE, 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 detected significantly more liver lesions (673 vs. 584, P = 0.002). The target-to-background ratio of liver lesions was significantly higher on 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 (6.4 ± 8.7 vs. 3.1 ±2.6, P = 0.000). Comparable uptake was observed for primary tumors, bone lesions, and lymph node metastases. In total, 180 lesions were detected on conventional imaging in 15 patients; 165 and 139 lesions of them were positive on 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 and 68Ga-DOTATATE, leading to a sensitivity of 91.7% and 77.2%, respectively. In 14.5% (7/48) of patients, 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 PET might have a potential impact on clinical management. Conclusion: 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 shows better sensitivity and a higher target-to-background ratio than 68Ga-DOTATATE. The detection of more lesions by the antagonist may have a potential impact on clinical management in a subgroup of patients.

本研究旨在比较68Ga-NODAGA-Cpa-cyclo(d-Cys-amino-Phe-hydroorotic acid-d-4-amino-Phe(carbamoyl)-Lys-Thr-Cys)-d-Tyr-NH2 (JR11)和68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT在转移性、分化良好的神经内分泌肿瘤患者中的表现。方法:一项前瞻性双中心研究旨在招募100例组织学证实的、转移性或不可切除的、分化良好的神经内分泌肿瘤患者。前48名患者代表了研究队列。第1天给予68Ga-DOTATATE,第2天给予68Ga-NODAGA-JR11。注射后40-60分钟进行全身PET/CT扫描。比较正常器官摄取、病变数量、病变摄取和敏感性。还确定了对临床管理的潜在影响。结果:总体而言,68Ga-NODAGA-JR11在正常器官中表现出较低的背景摄取。与68Ga-DOTATATE相比,68Ga-NODAGA-JR11检出率明显高于68Ga-DOTATATE(673比584,P = 0.002)。68Ga-NODAGA-JR11组肝脏病变的靶本比(6.4±8.7比3.1±2.6,P = 0.000)显著高于68Ga-NODAGA-JR11组。在原发肿瘤、骨病变和淋巴结转移中观察到类似的摄取。15例患者常规影像学检查共发现180个病变;68Ga-NODAGA-JR11阳性165例,68Ga-DOTATATE阳性139例,敏感性分别为91.7%和77.2%。在14.5%(7/48)的患者中,68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 PET可能对临床管理产生潜在影响。结论:68Ga-NODAGA-JR11比68Ga-DOTATATE具有更好的灵敏度和更高的靶本比。拮抗剂对更多病变的检测可能对亚组患者的临床管理产生潜在影响。
{"title":"Head-to-Head Comparison of <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-JR11 and <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in Patients with Metastatic, Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors: Interim Analysis of a Prospective Bicenter Study.","authors":"Zefang Lin,&nbsp;Wenjia Zhu,&nbsp;Jiaying Zhang,&nbsp;Weibing Miao,&nbsp;Shaobo Yao,&nbsp;Li Huo","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.122.264890","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.264890","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study aimed to compare <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-Cpa-cyclo(d-Cys-amino-Phe-hydroorotic acid-d-4-amino-Phe(carbamoyl)-Lys-Thr-Cys)-d-Tyr-NH<sub>2</sub> (JR11) and <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with metastatic, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective bicenter study aimed at enrolling 100 patients with histologically proven, metastatic or unresectable, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors was conducted. The first 48 patients represented the study cohort. Each patient received <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE on the first day and <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-JR11 on the second day. Whole-body PET/CT scans were performed at 40-60 min after injection. Normal-organ uptake, lesion numbers, lesion uptake, and sensitivity were compared. The potential impact on clinical management was also determined. <b>Results:</b> Overall, <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-JR11 demonstrated lower background uptake in normal organs. Compared with <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE, <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-JR11 detected significantly more liver lesions (673 vs. 584, <i>P</i> = 0.002). The target-to-background ratio of liver lesions was significantly higher on <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-JR11 (6.4 ± 8.7 vs. 3.1 ±2.6, <i>P</i> = 0.000). Comparable uptake was observed for primary tumors, bone lesions, and lymph node metastases. In total, 180 lesions were detected on conventional imaging in 15 patients; 165 and 139 lesions of them were positive on <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-JR11 and <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE, leading to a sensitivity of 91.7% and 77.2%, respectively. In 14.5% (7/48) of patients, <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-JR11 PET might have a potential impact on clinical management. <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-JR11 shows better sensitivity and a higher target-to-background ratio than <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE. The detection of more lesions by the antagonist may have a potential impact on clinical management in a subgroup of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 9","pages":"1406-1411"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10538268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Evaluation of 68Ga-FAPI-RGD for Imaging of Fibroblast Activation Protein and Integrin αvβ3 in Various Cancer Types. 68Ga-FAPI-RGD对不同类型肿瘤成纤维细胞活化蛋白和整合素αvβ3成像的临床评价
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265383
Liang Zhao, Xuejun Wen, Weizhi Xu, Yizhen Pang, Long Sun, Xiaoming Wu, Pengfei Xu, Jingjing Zhang, Zhide Guo, Qin Lin, Xiaoyuan Chen, Haojun Chen

Radiolabeled fibroblast activation protein (FAP) inhibitors (FAPIs) and Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptides have been extensively investigated for imaging of FAP- and integrin αvβ3-positive tumors. In this study, a FAPI-RGD heterodimer was radiolabeled with 68Ga and evaluated in patients with cancer. We hypothesized that the heterodimer, recognizing both FAP and integrin αvβ3, would be advantageous because of its dual-receptor-targeting property. Methods: The effective dose of 68Ga-FAPI-RGD was evaluated in 3 healthy volunteers. The clinical feasibility of 68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT was evaluated in 22 patients with various types of cancer, and the results were compared with those of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-46. Results: 68Ga-FAPI-RGD was tolerated well, with no adverse events in any of the healthy volunteers or patients. The effective dose from 68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT was 1.01 × 10-2 mSv/MBq. In clinical investigations with different types of cancer, the radiotracer uptake and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of primary and metastatic lesions in 68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT were significantly higher than those in 18F-FDG PET/CT (primary tumors: SUVmax, 18.0 vs. 9.1 [P < 0.001], and TBR, 15.2 vs. 5.5 [P < 0.001]; lymph node metastases: SUVmax, 12.1 vs. 6.1 [P < 0.001], and TBR, 13.3 vs. 4.1 [P < 0.001]), resulting in an improved lesion detection rate and tumor delineation, particularly for the diagnosis of lymph node (99% vs. 91%) and bone (100% vs. 80%) metastases. 68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT also yielded a higher radiotracer uptake and TBR than 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT did. Conclusion: 68Ga-FAPI-RGD exhibited improved tumor uptake and TBR compared with 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT. This study demonstrated the safety and clinical feasibility of 68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT for imaging of various types of cancer.

放射性标记的成纤维细胞活化蛋白(FAP)抑制剂(FAPIs)和arg - gy - asp (RGD)肽已被广泛研究用于FAP和整合素αvβ3阳性肿瘤的成像。在本研究中,FAPI-RGD异源二聚体用68Ga进行放射性标记,并在癌症患者中进行评估。我们假设,同时识别FAP和整合素αvβ3的异源二聚体将是有利的,因为它具有双受体靶向特性。方法:对3名健康志愿者进行68Ga-FAPI-RGD有效剂量测定。对22例不同类型肿瘤患者进行68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT的临床可行性评估,并与18F-FDG和68Ga-FAPI-46的结果进行比较。结果:68Ga-FAPI-RGD耐受性良好,所有健康志愿者和患者均无不良事件发生。68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT有效剂量为1.01 × 10-2 mSv/MBq。在不同类型肿瘤的临床研究中,68ga - fpi - rgd PET/CT对原发和转移灶的示踪剂摄取和肿瘤/背景比(TBR)均显著高于18F-FDG PET/CT(原发肿瘤:SUVmax, 18.0 vs. 9.1 [P < 0.001], TBR, 15.2 vs. 5.5 [P < 0.001];淋巴结转移:SUVmax, 12.1 vs. 6.1 [P < 0.001], TBR, 13.3 vs. 4.1 [P < 0.001]),导致病变检出率和肿瘤描绘提高,特别是对于淋巴结(99% vs. 91%)和骨(100% vs. 80%)转移的诊断。68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT也比68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT产生更高的放射性示踪剂摄取和TBR。结论:与18F-FDG和68Ga-FAPI PET/CT相比,68Ga-FAPI- rgd具有更好的肿瘤摄取和TBR。本研究验证了68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT对各种类型肿瘤成像的安全性和临床可行性。
{"title":"Clinical Evaluation of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD for Imaging of Fibroblast Activation Protein and Integrin α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>3</sub> in Various Cancer Types.","authors":"Liang Zhao,&nbsp;Xuejun Wen,&nbsp;Weizhi Xu,&nbsp;Yizhen Pang,&nbsp;Long Sun,&nbsp;Xiaoming Wu,&nbsp;Pengfei Xu,&nbsp;Jingjing Zhang,&nbsp;Zhide Guo,&nbsp;Qin Lin,&nbsp;Xiaoyuan Chen,&nbsp;Haojun Chen","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.122.265383","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.265383","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiolabeled fibroblast activation protein (FAP) inhibitors (FAPIs) and Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptides have been extensively investigated for imaging of FAP- and integrin α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>3</sub>-positive tumors. In this study, a FAPI-RGD heterodimer was radiolabeled with <sup>68</sup>Ga and evaluated in patients with cancer. We hypothesized that the heterodimer, recognizing both FAP and integrin α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>3</sub>, would be advantageous because of its dual-receptor-targeting property. <b>Methods:</b> The effective dose of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD was evaluated in 3 healthy volunteers. The clinical feasibility of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT was evaluated in 22 patients with various types of cancer, and the results were compared with those of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46. <b>Results:</b> <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD was tolerated well, with no adverse events in any of the healthy volunteers or patients. The effective dose from <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT was 1.01 × 10<sup>-2</sup> mSv/MBq. In clinical investigations with different types of cancer, the radiotracer uptake and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of primary and metastatic lesions in <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT were significantly higher than those in <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT (primary tumors: SUV<sub>max</sub>, 18.0 vs. 9.1 [<i>P</i> < 0.001], and TBR, 15.2 vs. 5.5 [<i>P</i> < 0.001]; lymph node metastases: SUV<sub>max</sub>, 12.1 vs. 6.1 [<i>P</i> < 0.001], and TBR, 13.3 vs. 4.1 [<i>P</i> < 0.001]), resulting in an improved lesion detection rate and tumor delineation, particularly for the diagnosis of lymph node (99% vs. 91%) and bone (100% vs. 80%) metastases. <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT also yielded a higher radiotracer uptake and TBR than <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT did. <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD exhibited improved tumor uptake and TBR compared with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI PET/CT. This study demonstrated the safety and clinical feasibility of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT for imaging of various types of cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1210-1217"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10394316/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9921386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of FAPI PET/CT in Oncologic Studies: Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. FAPI PET/CT在肿瘤学研究中的诊断准确性评价:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265471
Grayson Wass, Kari Clifford, Rathan M Subramaniam

Fibroblast-activation protein is a promising target for oncologic molecular imaging. Studies show that fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) radiotracers are accurate diagnostics with favorable tumor-to-background ratios across various cancers. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and metaanalysis to assess the diagnostic performance of FAPI PET/CT in comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT, the most widely used radiotracer in oncology. Methods: We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, relevant trial registries, and bibliographies. The search consisted of combinations of terms for 3 topics: neoplasia, PET/CT, and FAPI. Two authors independently screened retrieved articles using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted the data. Study quality was assessed using the criteria of QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2). For each study, the sensitivity, specificity, and 95% CIs were calculated to determine diagnostic accuracy for primary, nodal, and metastatic lesions. A random-effects metaanalysis was used for pooling the data, and heterogeneity was assessed (I2 index). Results: Thirty-nine studies (1,259 patients) investigating the use of FAPI PET/CT were included. On a patient-based analysis, pooled sensitivity was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.0) for the detection of primary lesions. Pooled sensitivity for nodal and distant metastases was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81-0.96) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-1.0), respectively. On a paired analysis between FAPI and [18F]FDG PET/CT, FAPI had a higher sensitivity in the detection of primary, nodal, and metastatic lesions (all P < 0.001). The differences in sensitivities between FAPI and [18F]FDG were statistically significant. In terms of heterogeneity, analyses on primary lesions were moderately affected, distant metastatic lesions were highly affected, and the nodal metastatic analyses had negligible heterogeneity. Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of FAPI PET/CT is superior to that of [18F]FDG in the detection of primary, nodal, and distant metastases. However, further studies are needed to better evaluate its utility and indication in specific cancer types and clinical settings.

成纤维细胞活化蛋白是肿瘤分子成像的重要靶点。研究表明,成纤维细胞活化蛋白抑制剂(FAPI)放射性示踪剂在各种癌症中具有良好的肿瘤与背景比,是准确的诊断方法。因此,我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估FAPI PET/CT与[18F]FDG PET/CT的诊断性能,FAPI PET/CT是肿瘤学中使用最广泛的放射性示踪剂。方法:系统检索MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、PubMed、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、相关试验注册库和参考文献。搜索包括三个主题的术语组合:肿瘤、PET/CT和FAPI。两位作者使用预定义的纳入和排除标准独立筛选检索到的文章,并提取数据。使用QUADAS-2(诊断准确性研究质量评估2)的标准评估研究质量。对于每项研究,计算敏感性、特异性和95% ci,以确定原发性、淋巴结性和转移性病变的诊断准确性。采用随机效应荟萃分析合并数据,并评估异质性(I2指数)。结果:39项研究(1259例患者)调查了FAPI PET/CT的使用。在基于患者的分析中,检测原发病变的总敏感性为0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.0)。淋巴结转移和远处转移的总敏感性分别为0.91 (95% CI, 0.81-0.96)和0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-1.0)。在FAPI与[18F]FDG PET/CT的配对分析中,FAPI在检测原发性、淋巴结性和转移性病变方面具有更高的敏感性(所有p18f]FDG均具有统计学意义)。在异质性方面,原发病变的分析受到中度影响,远处转移病变受到高度影响,而淋巴结转移分析的异质性可以忽略不计。结论:FAPI PET/CT对原发性、淋巴结性和远处转移的诊断能力优于[18F]FDG。然而,需要进一步的研究来更好地评估其在特定癌症类型和临床环境中的效用和适应症。
{"title":"Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of FAPI PET/CT in Oncologic Studies: Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.","authors":"Grayson Wass,&nbsp;Kari Clifford,&nbsp;Rathan M Subramaniam","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.123.265471","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.265471","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fibroblast-activation protein is a promising target for oncologic molecular imaging. Studies show that fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) radiotracers are accurate diagnostics with favorable tumor-to-background ratios across various cancers. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and metaanalysis to assess the diagnostic performance of FAPI PET/CT in comparison with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, the most widely used radiotracer in oncology. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, relevant trial registries, and bibliographies. The search consisted of combinations of terms for 3 topics: neoplasia, PET/CT, and FAPI. Two authors independently screened retrieved articles using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted the data. Study quality was assessed using the criteria of QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2). For each study, the sensitivity, specificity, and 95% CIs were calculated to determine diagnostic accuracy for primary, nodal, and metastatic lesions. A random-effects metaanalysis was used for pooling the data, and heterogeneity was assessed (I<sup>2</sup> index). <b>Results:</b> Thirty-nine studies (1,259 patients) investigating the use of FAPI PET/CT were included. On a patient-based analysis, pooled sensitivity was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.0) for the detection of primary lesions. Pooled sensitivity for nodal and distant metastases was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81-0.96) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-1.0), respectively. On a paired analysis between FAPI and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, FAPI had a higher sensitivity in the detection of primary, nodal, and metastatic lesions (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). The differences in sensitivities between FAPI and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG were statistically significant. In terms of heterogeneity, analyses on primary lesions were moderately affected, distant metastatic lesions were highly affected, and the nodal metastatic analyses had negligible heterogeneity. <b>Conclusion:</b> The diagnostic performance of FAPI PET/CT is superior to that of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG in the detection of primary, nodal, and distant metastases. However, further studies are needed to better evaluate its utility and indication in specific cancer types and clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1218-1224"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10287894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Comparative Evaluation of [18F]5-Fluoroaminosuberic Acid and (4S)-4-3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-l-Glutamate as System xC--Targeting Radiopharmaceuticals. [18F]5-氟氨基亚酰基酸与(4S)-4-3-[18F]氟丙基)-l-谷氨酸作为xC-靶向放射性药物的比较评价
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265254
Milena Colovic, Hua Yang, Lily Southcott, Helen Merkens, Nadine Colpo, Francois Bénard, Paul Schaffer

System [Formula: see text] is an appealing biomarker for targeting oxidative stress with oncologic PET imaging and can serve as an alternative PET biomarker to other metabolic indicators. In this paper, we report a direct comparison of 2 18F-labeled amino acid radiopharmaceuticals targeting system [Formula: see text], [18F]5-fluoroaminosuberic acid ([18F]FASu) and (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-l-glutamate ([18F]FSPG), in terms of their uptake specificity and ability to image glioma and lung cancer xenografts in vivo. Methods: Both tracers were synthesized according to previously published procedures. In vitro uptake specificity assays were conducted using prostate (PC-3), glioblastoma (U-87), colorectal (HT-29), ovarian (SKOV3), breast (MDA-MB-231), and lung cancer (A549) cell lines. PET/CT imaging and biodistribution studies were conducted in immunocompromised mice bearing U-87 or A549 xenografts. Results: In vitro cell uptake assays showed that the tracers accumulated in cancer cells in a time-dependent manner and that the uptake of [18F]FASu was blocked by the system [Formula: see text] inhibitor sulfasalazine and rose bengal, but not by system L inhibitor 2-aminobicyclo-(2,2,1)-heptane-2-carboxylic acid, system [Formula: see text] inhibitor L-trans-pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylic acid, or l-serine, which is a substrate for transporter systems A, ACS, B0, and B0,+ Conversely, [18F]FSPG uptake decreased significantly in the presence of an excess of L-trans-pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylic acid in 2 of 3 tested cell lines, indicating some reliance on system [Formula: see text] in these cells. In an in vivo setting, [18F]FASu and [18F]FSPG generated good-contrast PET images in U-87 and A549 tumor-bearing mice. Tracer accumulation in A549 tumors was 5.0 ± 0.8 percentage injected dose (%ID)/g ([18F]FASu, n ≥ 5) and 6.3 ± 1.3 %ID/g ([18F]FSPG, n ≥ 6, P = 0.7786), whereas U-87 xenografts demonstrated uptake of 6.1 ± 2.4 %ID/g ([18F]FASu, n ≥ 4) and 11.2 ± 4.1 %ID/g ([18F]FSPG, n ≥ 4, P = 0.0321) at 1 h after injection. Conclusion: [18F]FSPG had greater in vitro uptake than [18F]FASu in all cell lines tested; however, our results indicate that residual uptake differences exist between [18F]FSPG and [18F]FASu, suggesting alternative transporter activity in the cell lines tested. In vivo studies demonstrated the ability of both [18F]FASu and [18F]FSPG to image glioblastoma (U-87) and non-small cell lung cancer (A549) xenografts.

系统[公式:见文本]是一种有吸引力的生物标志物,用于肿瘤PET成像靶向氧化应激,可以作为其他代谢指标的替代PET生物标志物。在本文中,我们报道了直接比较2种18F标记的氨基酸放射性药物靶向系统[公式:见文],[18F]5-氟氨基亚酸([18F]FASu)和(4S)-4-(3-[18F]氟丙基)-l-谷氨酸([18F]FSPG)在体内的摄取特异性和对胶质瘤和肺癌异种移植物的成像能力。方法:两种示踪剂均按照先前发表的方法合成。采用前列腺(PC-3)、胶质母细胞瘤(U-87)、结直肠癌(HT-29)、卵巢癌(SKOV3)、乳腺癌(MDA-MB-231)和肺癌(A549)细胞系进行体外摄取特异性测定。在移植U-87或A549的免疫功能低下小鼠中进行PET/CT成像和生物分布研究。结果:体外细胞摄取实验显示,示踪剂在癌细胞中以时间依赖性的方式积累,并且[18F]FASu的摄取被系统[公式:见文]抑制剂磺胺氮嗪和玫瑰花阻断,但不被系统L抑制剂2-氨基双环-(2,2,1)-正烷-2-羧酸,系统[公式:]抑制剂l-反式吡咯烷-2,4-二羧酸,或l-丝氨酸,它是转运体系统a、ACS、B0和B0的底物。相反,[18F]在3个被测试的细胞系中,有2个细胞系中l-反式吡咯烷-2,4-二羧酸过量时,FSPG摄取显著下降,表明这些细胞对系统有一定依赖。在体内环境下,[18F]FASu和[18F]FSPG在U-87和A549荷瘤小鼠中产生了对比度良好的PET图像。示踪剂在A549肿瘤中的累积量为注射剂量(%ID)/g ([18F]FASu, n≥5)和6.3±1.3% ID/g ([18F]FSPG, n≥6,P = 0.7786),而U-87异种移植物在注射后1 h的摄取量为6.1±2.4% ID/g ([18F]FASu, n≥4)和11.2±4.1% ID/g ([18F]FSPG, n≥4,P = 0.0321)。结论:[18F]FSPG在所有细胞系的体外摄取均高于[18F]FASu;然而,我们的研究结果表明,[18F]FSPG和[18F]FASu之间存在残留摄取差异,这表明在测试的细胞系中存在不同的转运蛋白活性。体内研究证实了[18F]FASu和[18F]FSPG对胶质母细胞瘤(U-87)和非小细胞肺癌(A549)异种移植物的成像能力。
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of [<sup>18</sup>F]5-Fluoroaminosuberic Acid and (4<i>S</i>)-4-3-[<sup>18</sup>F]fluoropropyl)-l-Glutamate as System xC--Targeting Radiopharmaceuticals.","authors":"Milena Colovic,&nbsp;Hua Yang,&nbsp;Lily Southcott,&nbsp;Helen Merkens,&nbsp;Nadine Colpo,&nbsp;Francois Bénard,&nbsp;Paul Schaffer","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.122.265254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.265254","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>System [Formula: see text] is an appealing biomarker for targeting oxidative stress with oncologic PET imaging and can serve as an alternative PET biomarker to other metabolic indicators. In this paper, we report a direct comparison of 2 <sup>18</sup>F-labeled amino acid radiopharmaceuticals targeting system [Formula: see text], [<sup>18</sup>F]5-fluoroaminosuberic acid ([<sup>18</sup>F]FASu) and (4<i>S</i>)-4-(3-[<sup>18</sup>F]fluoropropyl)-l-glutamate ([<sup>18</sup>F]FSPG), in terms of their uptake specificity and ability to image glioma and lung cancer xenografts in vivo. <b>Methods:</b> Both tracers were synthesized according to previously published procedures. In vitro uptake specificity assays were conducted using prostate (PC-3), glioblastoma (U-87), colorectal (HT-29), ovarian (SKOV3), breast (MDA-MB-231), and lung cancer (A549) cell lines. PET/CT imaging and biodistribution studies were conducted in immunocompromised mice bearing U-87 or A549 xenografts. <b>Results:</b> In vitro cell uptake assays showed that the tracers accumulated in cancer cells in a time-dependent manner and that the uptake of [<sup>18</sup>F]FASu was blocked by the system [Formula: see text] inhibitor sulfasalazine and rose bengal, but not by system L inhibitor 2-aminobicyclo-(2,2,1)-heptane-2-carboxylic acid, system [Formula: see text] inhibitor L-<i>trans</i>-pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylic acid, or l-serine, which is a substrate for transporter systems A, ACS, B<sup>0</sup>, and B<sup>0,+</sup> Conversely, [<sup>18</sup>F]FSPG uptake decreased significantly in the presence of an excess of L-<i>trans</i>-pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylic acid in 2 of 3 tested cell lines, indicating some reliance on system [Formula: see text] in these cells. In an in vivo setting, [<sup>18</sup>F]FASu and [<sup>18</sup>F]FSPG generated good-contrast PET images in U-87 and A549 tumor-bearing mice. Tracer accumulation in A549 tumors was 5.0 ± 0.8 percentage injected dose (%ID)/g ([<sup>18</sup>F]FASu, <i>n</i> ≥ 5) and 6.3 ± 1.3 %ID/g ([<sup>18</sup>F]FSPG, <i>n</i> ≥ 6, <i>P</i> = 0.7786), whereas U-87 xenografts demonstrated uptake of 6.1 ± 2.4 %ID/g ([<sup>18</sup>F]FASu, <i>n</i> ≥ 4) and 11.2 ± 4.1 %ID/g ([<sup>18</sup>F]FSPG, <i>n</i> ≥ 4, <i>P</i> = 0.0321) at 1 h after injection. <b>Conclusion:</b> [<sup>18</sup>F]FSPG had greater in vitro uptake than [<sup>18</sup>F]FASu in all cell lines tested; however, our results indicate that residual uptake differences exist between [<sup>18</sup>F]FSPG and [<sup>18</sup>F]FASu, suggesting alternative transporter activity in the cell lines tested. In vivo studies demonstrated the ability of both [<sup>18</sup>F]FASu and [<sup>18</sup>F]FSPG to image glioblastoma (U-87) and non-small cell lung cancer (A549) xenografts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1314-1321"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9930210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Facial Anonymization and Privacy Concerns in Total-Body PET/CT. 全身 PET/CT 中的面部匿名化和隐私问题。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-02 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265280
Aaron R Selfridge, Benjamin A Spencer, Yasser G Abdelhafez, Keisuke Nakagawa, John D Tupin, Ramsey D Badawi

Total-body PET/CT images can be rendered to produce images of a subject's face and body. In response to privacy and identifiability concerns when sharing data, we have developed and validated a workflow that obscures (defaces) a subject's face in 3-dimensional volumetric data. Methods: To validate our method, we measured facial identifiability before and after defacing images from 30 healthy subjects who were imaged with both [18F]FDG PET and CT at either 3 or 6 time points. Briefly, facial embeddings were calculated using Google's FaceNet, and an analysis of clustering was used to estimate identifiability. Results: Faces rendered from CT images were correctly matched to CT scans at other time points at a rate of 93%, which decreased to 6% after defacing. Faces rendered from PET images were correctly matched to PET images at other time points at a maximum rate of 64% and to CT images at a maximum rate of 50%, both of which decreased to 7% after defacing. We further demonstrated that defaced CT images can be used for attenuation correction during PET reconstruction, introducing a maximum bias of -3.3% in regions of the cerebral cortex nearest the face. Conclusion: We believe that the proposed method provides a baseline of anonymity and discretion when sharing image data online or between institutions and will help to facilitate collaboration and future regulatory compliance.

全身正电子发射计算机断层显像/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)图像经渲染后可生成受试者的面部和身体图像。为了解决共享数据时的隐私和可识别性问题,我们开发并验证了一种在三维容积数据中模糊(玷污)受试者面部的工作流程。方法:为了验证我们的方法,我们测量了30名健康受试者在3个或6个时间点同时接受[18F]FDG PET和CT成像的图像去污前后的面部可识别性。简而言之,我们使用谷歌 FaceNet 计算了面部嵌入,并使用聚类分析估算了可识别性。结果:通过 CT 图像呈现的人脸与其他时间点的 CT 扫描的正确匹配率为 93%,而在污损后,正确匹配率降至 6%。通过 PET 图像呈现的人脸与其他时间点的 PET 图像的正确匹配率最高为 64%,与 CT 图像的正确匹配率最高为 50%,两者在污损后均降至 7%。我们进一步证明,玷污的 CT 图像可用于 PET 重建过程中的衰减校正,在最靠近面部的大脑皮层区域引入的最大偏差为 -3.3%。结论我们相信,所提出的方法为在线或机构间共享图像数据提供了一个匿名和谨慎的基线,并将有助于促进合作和未来的合规性。
{"title":"Facial Anonymization and Privacy Concerns in Total-Body PET/CT.","authors":"Aaron R Selfridge, Benjamin A Spencer, Yasser G Abdelhafez, Keisuke Nakagawa, John D Tupin, Ramsey D Badawi","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.122.265280","DOIUrl":"10.2967/jnumed.122.265280","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Total-body PET/CT images can be rendered to produce images of a subject's face and body. In response to privacy and identifiability concerns when sharing data, we have developed and validated a workflow that obscures (defaces) a subject's face in 3-dimensional volumetric data. <b>Methods:</b> To validate our method, we measured facial identifiability before and after defacing images from 30 healthy subjects who were imaged with both [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET and CT at either 3 or 6 time points. Briefly, facial embeddings were calculated using Google's FaceNet, and an analysis of clustering was used to estimate identifiability. <b>Results:</b> Faces rendered from CT images were correctly matched to CT scans at other time points at a rate of 93%, which decreased to 6% after defacing. Faces rendered from PET images were correctly matched to PET images at other time points at a maximum rate of 64% and to CT images at a maximum rate of 50%, both of which decreased to 7% after defacing. We further demonstrated that defaced CT images can be used for attenuation correction during PET reconstruction, introducing a maximum bias of -3.3% in regions of the cerebral cortex nearest the face. <b>Conclusion:</b> We believe that the proposed method provides a baseline of anonymity and discretion when sharing image data online or between institutions and will help to facilitate collaboration and future regulatory compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1304-1309"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10394314/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9933184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-Radioligand Therapy Efficacy Outcomes in Taxane-Naïve Versus Taxane-Treated Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. [177Lu]放射配体治疗Taxane-Naïve与紫杉烷治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的疗效结局:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265414
Swayamjeet Satapathy, Ranjit K Sahoo, Chandrasekhar Bal

Radioligand therapy (RLT) with 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) inhibitors ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA) is currently approved for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after progression with at least 1 taxane and 1 androgen-receptor-pathway inhibitor. However, the impact of prior chemotherapy on [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT outcomes is debatable, with various studies showing inconsistent results. This study was conducted to precisely evaluate the impact of prior taxane chemotherapy on response and survival outcomes in mCRPC patients after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT. Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were made using relevant key words, and articles up to December 2022 were included. The endpoints included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR), progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Individual patient data were pooled when feasible. Univariate odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted from the individual articles, and pooled estimates and 95% CIs were generated using metaanalysis. Results: Thirteen articles comprising 2,068 patients were included. In 6 articles (553 patients), taxane-naïve patients had significantly better odds of biochemical response after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT (pooled OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.21-2.71). Individual patient data metaanalysis for PSA RRs in 3 articles revealed a significantly higher PSA RR in the taxane-naïve versus taxane-treated patients (57.1% vs. 39.5%; difference, 17.6%; 95% CI, 5.6%-28.9%). Further, taxane-naïve status was also a predictor of significantly better progression-free survival (5 articles; 1,027 patients; pooled HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51-0.69) and OS (8 articles; 1,594 patients; pooled HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43-0.68) after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT. There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusion: mCRPC patients with no prior taxanes had significantly better outcomes after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT than did taxane-treated patients. Further trials evaluating [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT in the taxane-naïve setting are now required.

177Lu-前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)抑制剂([177Lu]Lu-PSMA)的放射配体治疗(RLT)目前被批准用于至少1种紫紫烷和1种雄激素受体途径抑制剂进展后的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者。然而,既往化疗对[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT结果的影响是有争议的,各种研究显示不一致的结果。本研究旨在精确评估既往紫杉烷化疗对mCRPC患者在Lu-PSMA-RLT后的疗效和生存结局的影响[177Lu]。方法:本综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。在PubMed, Scopus和Embase中使用相关关键词进行搜索,并包括截至2022年12月的文章。终点包括前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)反应率(RR)、无进展生存期(progression-free survival)和总生存期(OS)。在可行的情况下,将患者的个人数据汇总。从单篇文章中提取单因素优势比(ORs)和风险比(hr),并通过荟萃分析得出汇总估计值和95% ci。结果:纳入13篇文章,2068例患者。在6篇文章(553例患者)中,taxane-naïve患者在[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT后生化反应的几率显著提高(合并OR为1.82;95% ci, 1.21-2.71)。3篇文章的个体患者数据荟萃分析显示,taxane-naïve与紫杉烷治疗患者的PSA RR显著高于紫杉烷治疗患者(57.1% vs 39.5%;差异,17.6%;95% ci, 5.6%-28.9%)。此外,taxane-naïve状态也是显著更好的无进展生存期的预测因子(5篇文章;1027例;合并HR为0.60;95% CI, 0.51-0.69)和OS(8篇文章;1594例;合并HR为0.54;[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT后95% CI, 0.43-0.68)。没有证据表明存在发表偏倚。结论:既往未接受紫杉烷治疗的mCRPC患者在接受[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT治疗后的预后明显优于接受紫杉烷治疗的患者。目前需要在taxane-naïve环境下评估[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT的进一步试验。
{"title":"[<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-Radioligand Therapy Efficacy Outcomes in Taxane-Naïve Versus Taxane-Treated Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.","authors":"Swayamjeet Satapathy,&nbsp;Ranjit K Sahoo,&nbsp;Chandrasekhar Bal","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.123.265414","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.265414","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radioligand therapy (RLT) with <sup>177</sup>Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) inhibitors ([<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA) is currently approved for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after progression with at least 1 taxane and 1 androgen-receptor-pathway inhibitor. However, the impact of prior chemotherapy on [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT outcomes is debatable, with various studies showing inconsistent results. This study was conducted to precisely evaluate the impact of prior taxane chemotherapy on response and survival outcomes in mCRPC patients after [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT. <b>Methods:</b> This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were made using relevant key words, and articles up to December 2022 were included. The endpoints included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR), progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Individual patient data were pooled when feasible. Univariate odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted from the individual articles, and pooled estimates and 95% CIs were generated using metaanalysis. <b>Results:</b> Thirteen articles comprising 2,068 patients were included. In 6 articles (553 patients), taxane-naïve patients had significantly better odds of biochemical response after [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT (pooled OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.21-2.71). Individual patient data metaanalysis for PSA RRs in 3 articles revealed a significantly higher PSA RR in the taxane-naïve versus taxane-treated patients (57.1% vs. 39.5%; difference, 17.6%; 95% CI, 5.6%-28.9%). Further, taxane-naïve status was also a predictor of significantly better progression-free survival (5 articles; 1,027 patients; pooled HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51-0.69) and OS (8 articles; 1,594 patients; pooled HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43-0.68) after [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT. There was no evidence of publication bias. <b>Conclusion:</b> mCRPC patients with no prior taxanes had significantly better outcomes after [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT than did taxane-treated patients. Further trials evaluating [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT in the taxane-naïve setting are now required.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1266-1271"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9921390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
A VISION Substudy of Reader Agreement on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Scan Interpretation to Determine Patient Eligibility for 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT扫描解读读者协议的视觉亚研究,以确定患者是否适合177Lu-PSMA-617放射配位治疗。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265077
Phillip H Kuo, Don C Yoo, Ryan Avery, Marc Seltzer, Jeremie Calais, James Nagarajah, Wolfgang A Weber, Wolfgang P Fendler, Michael S Hofman, Bernd J Krause, Marcia Brackman, Euloge Kpamegan, Samson Ghebremariam, Taylor Benson, Ana M Catafau, Ayse T Kendi

[ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 ( 68Ga-PSMA-11) is used to identify prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive tumors on PET scans. In the VISION study, 68Ga-PSMA-11 was used to determine the eligibility of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer for treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617), based on predefined read criteria. This substudy aimed to investigate the interreader variability and intrareader reproducibility of visual assessments of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans using the VISION read criteria and evaluate the agreement between read results for this and the VISION study. Methods: In VISION, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans were centrally read as inclusion cases if they had at least 1 PSMA-positive lesion and no PSMA-negative lesions that fulfilled the exclusion criteria. In this substudy, 125 PET/CT scans (75 inclusion and 50 exclusion cases) were randomly selected from VISION and retrospectively assessed by 3 independent central readers. A random subset of 20 cases (12 inclusion and 8 exclusion cases) was recoded for assessment of intrareader reproducibility. Classification of cases as inclusion or exclusion cases was based on the VISION read criteria. Overall interreader variability was assessed by Fleiss κ-statistics, and pairwise variability and intrareader reproducibility were assessed by Cohen κ-statistics. Results: For interreader variability, the readers agreed on 77% of cases (overall average agreement rate, 0.85; Fleiss κ, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.50-0.70]). The pairwise agreement rate was 0.82, 0.88, and 0.84, and the corresponding Cohen κ was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.38-0.71), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52-0.83), and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.43-0.75), respectively. For intrareader reproducibility, the agreement rate was 0.90, 0.90, and 0.95, and the corresponding Cohen κ was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.49-0.99), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.46-0.99), and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.67-0.99), respectively. The number of actual VISION inclusion cases out of the total number of cases scored as inclusion in this substudy was 71 of 93 (agreement rate, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.85) for reader 1, 70 of 88 (0.80; 0.70-0.87) for reader 2, and 73 of 96 (0.76; 0.66-0.84) for reader 3. All readers agreed on 66 of 75 VISION inclusion cases. Conclusion: Moderate-to-substantial interreader agreement and substantial-to-almost perfect intrareader reproducibility for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan assessment using the VISION read criteria were observed. The read rules applied in VISION can be readily learned and demonstrate good reproducibility.

[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (68Ga-PSMA-11)用于PET扫描识别前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)阳性肿瘤。在VISION研究中,68Ga-PSMA-11被用于确定转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者是否有资格接受[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu- psma -617)治疗,基于预定义的阅读标准。本子研究旨在探讨68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT扫描使用VISION读取标准的视觉评估的解读器变异性和解读器内再现性,并评估本研究和VISION研究的读取结果之间的一致性。方法:在VISION中,68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT扫描集中读取至少1个psma阳性病变,无符合排除标准的psma阴性病变作为纳入病例。在本亚研究中,从VISION中随机选择125个PET/CT扫描(75个纳入病例和50个排除病例),并由3个独立的中心阅读器进行回顾性评估。随机选取20例(12例纳入病例和8例排除病例)重新编码,以评估阅读器内再现性。将病例分类为纳入病例或排除病例是基于VISION阅读标准。采用Fleiss κ-统计方法评估解读器总体变异性,采用Cohen κ-统计方法评估解读器两两变异性和解读器内再现性。结果:对于翻译的可变性,读者同意77%的案例(总体平均同意率,0.85;Fleiss κ, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.50-0.70])。两两一致率分别为0.82、0.88和0.84,对应的Cohen κ分别为0.54 (95% CI, 0.38-0.71)、0.67 (95% CI, 0.52-0.83)和0.59 (95% CI, 0.43-0.75)。在阅读器内再现性方面,一致性为0.90、0.90和0.95,对应的Cohen κ分别为0.78 (95% CI, 0.49-0.99)、0.76 (95% CI, 0.46-0.99)和0.89 (95% CI, 0.67-0.99)。在本子研究中被纳入的病例总数中,实际纳入VISION的病例数为93例中的71例(一致性率,0.76;读者1的95% CI, 0.66-0.85), 88人中有70人(0.80;0.70-0.87), 96个读者中有73个(0.76;0.66-0.84)。所有读者都同意75个VISION纳入案例中的66个。结论:使用VISION读取标准对68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT扫描进行评估,观察到中等至基本的解读器一致性和基本至几乎完美的解读器内再现性。在VISION中应用的读取规则可以很容易地学习,并且具有良好的再现性。
{"title":"A VISION Substudy of Reader Agreement on <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Scan Interpretation to Determine Patient Eligibility for <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy.","authors":"Phillip H Kuo,&nbsp;Don C Yoo,&nbsp;Ryan Avery,&nbsp;Marc Seltzer,&nbsp;Jeremie Calais,&nbsp;James Nagarajah,&nbsp;Wolfgang A Weber,&nbsp;Wolfgang P Fendler,&nbsp;Michael S Hofman,&nbsp;Bernd J Krause,&nbsp;Marcia Brackman,&nbsp;Euloge Kpamegan,&nbsp;Samson Ghebremariam,&nbsp;Taylor Benson,&nbsp;Ana M Catafau,&nbsp;Ayse T Kendi","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.122.265077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.265077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[ <sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 ( <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11) is used to identify prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive tumors on PET scans. In the VISION study, <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 was used to determine the eligibility of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer for treatment with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (<sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617), based on predefined read criteria. This substudy aimed to investigate the interreader variability and intrareader reproducibility of visual assessments of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans using the VISION read criteria and evaluate the agreement between read results for this and the VISION study. <b>Methods:</b> In VISION, <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans were centrally read as inclusion cases if they had at least 1 PSMA-positive lesion and no PSMA-negative lesions that fulfilled the exclusion criteria. In this substudy, 125 PET/CT scans (75 inclusion and 50 exclusion cases) were randomly selected from VISION and retrospectively assessed by 3 independent central readers. A random subset of 20 cases (12 inclusion and 8 exclusion cases) was recoded for assessment of intrareader reproducibility. Classification of cases as inclusion or exclusion cases was based on the VISION read criteria. Overall interreader variability was assessed by Fleiss κ-statistics, and pairwise variability and intrareader reproducibility were assessed by Cohen κ-statistics. <b>Results:</b> For interreader variability, the readers agreed on 77% of cases (overall average agreement rate, 0.85; Fleiss κ, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.50-0.70]). The pairwise agreement rate was 0.82, 0.88, and 0.84, and the corresponding Cohen κ was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.38-0.71), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52-0.83), and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.43-0.75), respectively. For intrareader reproducibility, the agreement rate was 0.90, 0.90, and 0.95, and the corresponding Cohen κ was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.49-0.99), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.46-0.99), and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.67-0.99), respectively. The number of actual VISION inclusion cases out of the total number of cases scored as inclusion in this substudy was 71 of 93 (agreement rate, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.85) for reader 1, 70 of 88 (0.80; 0.70-0.87) for reader 2, and 73 of 96 (0.76; 0.66-0.84) for reader 3. All readers agreed on 66 of 75 VISION inclusion cases. <b>Conclusion:</b> Moderate-to-substantial interreader agreement and substantial-to-almost perfect intrareader reproducibility for <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan assessment using the VISION read criteria were observed. The read rules applied in VISION can be readily learned and demonstrate good reproducibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1259-1265"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10394308/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9921418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
SUVmax Above 20 in 18F-FDG PET/CT at Initial Diagnostic Workup Associates with Favorable Survival in Patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary. 初始诊断时18F-FDG PET/CT的SUVmax大于20与原发不明癌症患者的良好生存率相关。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265161
Gregor Zaun, Manuel Weber, Martin Metzenmacher, Marcel Wiesweg, Thomas Hilser, Yasmin Zaun, Sven Liffers, Michael Pogorzelski, Isabel Virchow, Wilfried Eberhardt, Sarah Theurer, Tanja Abu Sabbah, Timm M Reissig, Martin Stuschke, Cornelius Kürten, Timon Hussain, Stephan Lang, Stefan Kasper, Wolfgang P Fendler, Ken Herrmann, Martin Schuler

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous entity with a limited prognosis. Novel prognostic markers are needed for patient stratification in prospective clinical trials exploring innovative therapies. Methods: In CUP patients treated at the West German Cancer Center Essen, the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT at the initial diagnostic workup was analyzed by comparing overall survival (OS) in patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT with those who did not. Results: Of 154 patients with a CUP diagnosis, 76 underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT at the initial diagnostic workup. The median overall survival (OS) of the full analysis set was 20.0 mo. Within the PET/CT subgroup, an SUVmax above 20 was associated with significantly superior OS (median OS, not reached vs. 32.0 mo; hazard ratio, 0.261; 95% CI, 0.095-0.713; P = 0.009). Conclusion: Our retrospective work shows that an SUVmax above 20 on 18F-FDG PET/CT at the initial diagnostic workup is a favorable prognostic factor in patients with CUP. This finding deserves further prospective studies for validation.

原发性未知癌(CUP)是一种异质性的肿瘤,预后有限。在探索创新疗法的前瞻性临床试验中,需要新的预后标志物来进行患者分层。方法:在西德埃森癌症中心治疗的CUP患者中,通过比较接受18F-FDG PET/CT和未接受18F-FDG PET/CT的患者的总生存期(OS),分析18F-FDG PET/CT在初始诊断检查中的预后价值。结果:154例CUP诊断患者中,76例在初始诊断检查时接受了18F-FDG PET/CT检查。整个分析集的中位总生存期(OS)为20.0个月。在PET/CT亚组中,SUVmax高于20与显著优于OS相关(中位OS,未达到vs. 32.0个月;风险比0.261;95% ci, 0.095-0.713;P = 0.009)。结论:我们的回顾性研究表明,初始诊断时18F-FDG PET/CT上SUVmax大于20是CUP患者预后的有利因素。这一发现值得进一步的前瞻性研究来验证。
{"title":"SUV<sub>max</sub> Above 20 in <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT at Initial Diagnostic Workup Associates with Favorable Survival in Patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary.","authors":"Gregor Zaun,&nbsp;Manuel Weber,&nbsp;Martin Metzenmacher,&nbsp;Marcel Wiesweg,&nbsp;Thomas Hilser,&nbsp;Yasmin Zaun,&nbsp;Sven Liffers,&nbsp;Michael Pogorzelski,&nbsp;Isabel Virchow,&nbsp;Wilfried Eberhardt,&nbsp;Sarah Theurer,&nbsp;Tanja Abu Sabbah,&nbsp;Timm M Reissig,&nbsp;Martin Stuschke,&nbsp;Cornelius Kürten,&nbsp;Timon Hussain,&nbsp;Stephan Lang,&nbsp;Stefan Kasper,&nbsp;Wolfgang P Fendler,&nbsp;Ken Herrmann,&nbsp;Martin Schuler","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.122.265161","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.265161","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous entity with a limited prognosis. Novel prognostic markers are needed for patient stratification in prospective clinical trials exploring innovative therapies. <b>Methods:</b> In CUP patients treated at the West German Cancer Center Essen, the prognostic value of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT at the initial diagnostic workup was analyzed by comparing overall survival (OS) in patients who underwent <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT with those who did not. <b>Results:</b> Of 154 patients with a CUP diagnosis, 76 underwent <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT at the initial diagnostic workup. The median overall survival (OS) of the full analysis set was 20.0 mo. Within the PET/CT subgroup, an SUV<sub>max</sub> above 20 was associated with significantly superior OS (median OS, not reached vs. 32.0 mo; hazard ratio, 0.261; 95% CI, 0.095-0.713; <i>P</i> = 0.009). <b>Conclusion:</b> Our retrospective work shows that an SUV<sub>max</sub> above 20 on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT at the initial diagnostic workup is a favorable prognostic factor in patients with CUP. This finding deserves further prospective studies for validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1191-1194"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9930782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Molecular Imaging, Radiochemistry, and Environmental Pollutants. 分子成像、放射化学和环境污染物。
IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-13 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265209
Samantha Delaney, Joni Sebastiano, Brian M Zeglis, Outi M Keinänen

The worldwide proliferation of persistent environmental pollutants is accelerating at an alarming rate. Not surprisingly, many of these pollutants pose a risk to human health. In this review, we examine recent literature in which molecular imaging and radiochemistry have been harnessed to study environmental pollutants. Specifically, these techniques offer unique ways to interrogate the pharmacokinetic profiles and bioaccumulation patterns of pollutants at environmentally relevant concentrations, thereby helping to determine their potential health risks.

持久性环境污染物正在以惊人的速度向全球扩散。毫不奇怪,其中许多污染物都对人类健康构成威胁。在这篇综述中,我们研究了最近利用分子成像和放射化学研究环境污染物的文献。具体来说,这些技术提供了独特的方法,可用于研究污染物在环境相关浓度下的药代动力学特征和生物累积模式,从而帮助确定其潜在的健康风险。
{"title":"Molecular Imaging, Radiochemistry, and Environmental Pollutants.","authors":"Samantha Delaney, Joni Sebastiano, Brian M Zeglis, Outi M Keinänen","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.122.265209","DOIUrl":"10.2967/jnumed.122.265209","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The worldwide proliferation of persistent environmental pollutants is accelerating at an alarming rate. Not surprisingly, many of these pollutants pose a risk to human health. In this review, we examine recent literature in which molecular imaging and radiochemistry have been harnessed to study environmental pollutants. Specifically, these techniques offer unique ways to interrogate the pharmacokinetic profiles and bioaccumulation patterns of pollutants at environmentally relevant concentrations, thereby helping to determine their potential health risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1179-1184"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10394311/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9934252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radiopharmaceutical Extravasations Can Have Consequences. 放射性药物外渗可能产生后果。
IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265717
Dale L Bailey
TO THE EDITOR: Regarding “Adverse Clinical Events at the Injection Site Are Exceedingly Rare After Reported Radiopharmaceutical Extravasation in Patients Undergoing Tc-MDP WholeBody Bone Scintigraphy: A 12-Year Experience” (1), I read this article with some interest from a purely scientific perspective. I am concerned that the results reported might be used to justify certain courses of action, or inaction, without the evidence to support these approaches. I have several misgivings about this article. First, thenumbers thathavebeenreportedfor inclusion in this study are likely to be significantly underestimated. Of the approximately 32,000scans that theauthorsexamined, they found118casesofdocumentedextravasation in theclinical reports, ofwhichonly96couldbe followed up. The authors cite other audits of bone scan administrations that quote extravasation rates of around 15%–20% in routine clinical practice. On the basis of the 15%–20% rate, the number of extravasations should have been more like 4,750–6,300 cases in the 12-y cohort. A rate of 15%–20% seems, from my experience, to be not unexpected for some degree of extravasation at the injection site. As the authors have included only patients for whom an extravasation had been noted in the clinical report—a notation that is rarely made—they acknowledge that this could lead to an underestimation of the incidence of extravasation. Indeed, the authors state that “this approach has the possibility [my emphasis] of missing studies in which [a radiopharmaceutical extravasation] occurred but was not documented in the report.”The lackofdocumentationby the reporting physicians may be because the technologist or nurse injecting the patient did not recognize the extravasation at the time of injection (often due to the low injected volumes used) and, hence, the extravasationwasdetected onlywhen the scanwasacquired somehours later. This is a serious underestimate and tends to undermine the authors’ conclusions. Second, the authors have little clinical or other follow-up information on extravasations that were not documented (assuming the true incidence of around 5,000–6,000 is correct) and seem to assume that if they did not hear anything from the patient then there was no problem. I propose that it is likely most extravasations will not lead to any significant unintended acute or chronic tissue damage but that just because one does not follow up about extravasation does not mean one has evidence of no extravasation issues. The authors may suggest that, on the basis of my estimates, in a cohort of 5,000–6,000 individuals the authors would likely learn of an adverse event even if there is only the slightest possibility of it. However, in complex, fragmented health-care systems, the feedback between primary-care and secondary or tertiary service providers is often tenuous at best, and many primary-care practitioners may not make a connection between the bone scan performed 1mo previously and the ongoing issue at
{"title":"Radiopharmaceutical Extravasations Can Have Consequences.","authors":"Dale L Bailey","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.123.265717","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.265717","url":null,"abstract":"TO THE EDITOR: Regarding “Adverse Clinical Events at the Injection Site Are Exceedingly Rare After Reported Radiopharmaceutical Extravasation in Patients Undergoing Tc-MDP WholeBody Bone Scintigraphy: A 12-Year Experience” (1), I read this article with some interest from a purely scientific perspective. I am concerned that the results reported might be used to justify certain courses of action, or inaction, without the evidence to support these approaches. I have several misgivings about this article. First, thenumbers thathavebeenreportedfor inclusion in this study are likely to be significantly underestimated. Of the approximately 32,000scans that theauthorsexamined, they found118casesofdocumentedextravasation in theclinical reports, ofwhichonly96couldbe followed up. The authors cite other audits of bone scan administrations that quote extravasation rates of around 15%–20% in routine clinical practice. On the basis of the 15%–20% rate, the number of extravasations should have been more like 4,750–6,300 cases in the 12-y cohort. A rate of 15%–20% seems, from my experience, to be not unexpected for some degree of extravasation at the injection site. As the authors have included only patients for whom an extravasation had been noted in the clinical report—a notation that is rarely made—they acknowledge that this could lead to an underestimation of the incidence of extravasation. Indeed, the authors state that “this approach has the possibility [my emphasis] of missing studies in which [a radiopharmaceutical extravasation] occurred but was not documented in the report.”The lackofdocumentationby the reporting physicians may be because the technologist or nurse injecting the patient did not recognize the extravasation at the time of injection (often due to the low injected volumes used) and, hence, the extravasationwasdetected onlywhen the scanwasacquired somehours later. This is a serious underestimate and tends to undermine the authors’ conclusions. Second, the authors have little clinical or other follow-up information on extravasations that were not documented (assuming the true incidence of around 5,000–6,000 is correct) and seem to assume that if they did not hear anything from the patient then there was no problem. I propose that it is likely most extravasations will not lead to any significant unintended acute or chronic tissue damage but that just because one does not follow up about extravasation does not mean one has evidence of no extravasation issues. The authors may suggest that, on the basis of my estimates, in a cohort of 5,000–6,000 individuals the authors would likely learn of an adverse event even if there is only the slightest possibility of it. However, in complex, fragmented health-care systems, the feedback between primary-care and secondary or tertiary service providers is often tenuous at best, and many primary-care practitioners may not make a connection between the bone scan performed 1mo previously and the ongoing issue at","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1324"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9928177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1