Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264890
Zefang Lin, Wenjia Zhu, Jiaying Zhang, Weibing Miao, Shaobo Yao, Li Huo
The current study aimed to compare 68Ga-NODAGA-Cpa-cyclo(d-Cys-amino-Phe-hydroorotic acid-d-4-amino-Phe(carbamoyl)-Lys-Thr-Cys)-d-Tyr-NH2 (JR11) and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with metastatic, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Methods: A prospective bicenter study aimed at enrolling 100 patients with histologically proven, metastatic or unresectable, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors was conducted. The first 48 patients represented the study cohort. Each patient received 68Ga-DOTATATE on the first day and 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 on the second day. Whole-body PET/CT scans were performed at 40-60 min after injection. Normal-organ uptake, lesion numbers, lesion uptake, and sensitivity were compared. The potential impact on clinical management was also determined. Results: Overall, 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 demonstrated lower background uptake in normal organs. Compared with 68Ga-DOTATATE, 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 detected significantly more liver lesions (673 vs. 584, P = 0.002). The target-to-background ratio of liver lesions was significantly higher on 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 (6.4 ± 8.7 vs. 3.1 ±2.6, P = 0.000). Comparable uptake was observed for primary tumors, bone lesions, and lymph node metastases. In total, 180 lesions were detected on conventional imaging in 15 patients; 165 and 139 lesions of them were positive on 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 and 68Ga-DOTATATE, leading to a sensitivity of 91.7% and 77.2%, respectively. In 14.5% (7/48) of patients, 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 PET might have a potential impact on clinical management. Conclusion:68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 shows better sensitivity and a higher target-to-background ratio than 68Ga-DOTATATE. The detection of more lesions by the antagonist may have a potential impact on clinical management in a subgroup of patients.
{"title":"Head-to-Head Comparison of <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-JR11 and <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in Patients with Metastatic, Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors: Interim Analysis of a Prospective Bicenter Study.","authors":"Zefang Lin, Wenjia Zhu, Jiaying Zhang, Weibing Miao, Shaobo Yao, Li Huo","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.122.264890","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.264890","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study aimed to compare <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-Cpa-cyclo(d-Cys-amino-Phe-hydroorotic acid-d-4-amino-Phe(carbamoyl)-Lys-Thr-Cys)-d-Tyr-NH<sub>2</sub> (JR11) and <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with metastatic, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective bicenter study aimed at enrolling 100 patients with histologically proven, metastatic or unresectable, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors was conducted. The first 48 patients represented the study cohort. Each patient received <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE on the first day and <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-JR11 on the second day. Whole-body PET/CT scans were performed at 40-60 min after injection. Normal-organ uptake, lesion numbers, lesion uptake, and sensitivity were compared. The potential impact on clinical management was also determined. <b>Results:</b> Overall, <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-JR11 demonstrated lower background uptake in normal organs. Compared with <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE, <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-JR11 detected significantly more liver lesions (673 vs. 584, <i>P</i> = 0.002). The target-to-background ratio of liver lesions was significantly higher on <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-JR11 (6.4 ± 8.7 vs. 3.1 ±2.6, <i>P</i> = 0.000). Comparable uptake was observed for primary tumors, bone lesions, and lymph node metastases. In total, 180 lesions were detected on conventional imaging in 15 patients; 165 and 139 lesions of them were positive on <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-JR11 and <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE, leading to a sensitivity of 91.7% and 77.2%, respectively. In 14.5% (7/48) of patients, <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-JR11 PET might have a potential impact on clinical management. <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>68</sup>Ga-NODAGA-JR11 shows better sensitivity and a higher target-to-background ratio than <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE. The detection of more lesions by the antagonist may have a potential impact on clinical management in a subgroup of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 9","pages":"1406-1411"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10538268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Radiolabeled fibroblast activation protein (FAP) inhibitors (FAPIs) and Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptides have been extensively investigated for imaging of FAP- and integrin αvβ3-positive tumors. In this study, a FAPI-RGD heterodimer was radiolabeled with 68Ga and evaluated in patients with cancer. We hypothesized that the heterodimer, recognizing both FAP and integrin αvβ3, would be advantageous because of its dual-receptor-targeting property. Methods: The effective dose of 68Ga-FAPI-RGD was evaluated in 3 healthy volunteers. The clinical feasibility of 68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT was evaluated in 22 patients with various types of cancer, and the results were compared with those of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-46. Results:68Ga-FAPI-RGD was tolerated well, with no adverse events in any of the healthy volunteers or patients. The effective dose from 68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT was 1.01 × 10-2 mSv/MBq. In clinical investigations with different types of cancer, the radiotracer uptake and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of primary and metastatic lesions in 68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT were significantly higher than those in 18F-FDG PET/CT (primary tumors: SUVmax, 18.0 vs. 9.1 [P < 0.001], and TBR, 15.2 vs. 5.5 [P < 0.001]; lymph node metastases: SUVmax, 12.1 vs. 6.1 [P < 0.001], and TBR, 13.3 vs. 4.1 [P < 0.001]), resulting in an improved lesion detection rate and tumor delineation, particularly for the diagnosis of lymph node (99% vs. 91%) and bone (100% vs. 80%) metastases. 68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT also yielded a higher radiotracer uptake and TBR than 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT did. Conclusion:68Ga-FAPI-RGD exhibited improved tumor uptake and TBR compared with 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT. This study demonstrated the safety and clinical feasibility of 68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT for imaging of various types of cancer.
放射性标记的成纤维细胞活化蛋白(FAP)抑制剂(FAPIs)和arg - gy - asp (RGD)肽已被广泛研究用于FAP和整合素αvβ3阳性肿瘤的成像。在本研究中,FAPI-RGD异源二聚体用68Ga进行放射性标记,并在癌症患者中进行评估。我们假设,同时识别FAP和整合素αvβ3的异源二聚体将是有利的,因为它具有双受体靶向特性。方法:对3名健康志愿者进行68Ga-FAPI-RGD有效剂量测定。对22例不同类型肿瘤患者进行68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT的临床可行性评估,并与18F-FDG和68Ga-FAPI-46的结果进行比较。结果:68Ga-FAPI-RGD耐受性良好,所有健康志愿者和患者均无不良事件发生。68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT有效剂量为1.01 × 10-2 mSv/MBq。在不同类型肿瘤的临床研究中,68ga - fpi - rgd PET/CT对原发和转移灶的示踪剂摄取和肿瘤/背景比(TBR)均显著高于18F-FDG PET/CT(原发肿瘤:SUVmax, 18.0 vs. 9.1 [P < 0.001], TBR, 15.2 vs. 5.5 [P < 0.001];淋巴结转移:SUVmax, 12.1 vs. 6.1 [P < 0.001], TBR, 13.3 vs. 4.1 [P < 0.001]),导致病变检出率和肿瘤描绘提高,特别是对于淋巴结(99% vs. 91%)和骨(100% vs. 80%)转移的诊断。68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT也比68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT产生更高的放射性示踪剂摄取和TBR。结论:与18F-FDG和68Ga-FAPI PET/CT相比,68Ga-FAPI- rgd具有更好的肿瘤摄取和TBR。本研究验证了68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT对各种类型肿瘤成像的安全性和临床可行性。
{"title":"Clinical Evaluation of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD for Imaging of Fibroblast Activation Protein and Integrin α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>3</sub> in Various Cancer Types.","authors":"Liang Zhao, Xuejun Wen, Weizhi Xu, Yizhen Pang, Long Sun, Xiaoming Wu, Pengfei Xu, Jingjing Zhang, Zhide Guo, Qin Lin, Xiaoyuan Chen, Haojun Chen","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.122.265383","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.265383","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiolabeled fibroblast activation protein (FAP) inhibitors (FAPIs) and Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptides have been extensively investigated for imaging of FAP- and integrin α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>3</sub>-positive tumors. In this study, a FAPI-RGD heterodimer was radiolabeled with <sup>68</sup>Ga and evaluated in patients with cancer. We hypothesized that the heterodimer, recognizing both FAP and integrin α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>3</sub>, would be advantageous because of its dual-receptor-targeting property. <b>Methods:</b> The effective dose of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD was evaluated in 3 healthy volunteers. The clinical feasibility of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT was evaluated in 22 patients with various types of cancer, and the results were compared with those of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46. <b>Results:</b> <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD was tolerated well, with no adverse events in any of the healthy volunteers or patients. The effective dose from <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT was 1.01 × 10<sup>-2</sup> mSv/MBq. In clinical investigations with different types of cancer, the radiotracer uptake and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of primary and metastatic lesions in <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT were significantly higher than those in <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT (primary tumors: SUV<sub>max</sub>, 18.0 vs. 9.1 [<i>P</i> < 0.001], and TBR, 15.2 vs. 5.5 [<i>P</i> < 0.001]; lymph node metastases: SUV<sub>max</sub>, 12.1 vs. 6.1 [<i>P</i> < 0.001], and TBR, 13.3 vs. 4.1 [<i>P</i> < 0.001]), resulting in an improved lesion detection rate and tumor delineation, particularly for the diagnosis of lymph node (99% vs. 91%) and bone (100% vs. 80%) metastases. <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT also yielded a higher radiotracer uptake and TBR than <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT did. <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD exhibited improved tumor uptake and TBR compared with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI PET/CT. This study demonstrated the safety and clinical feasibility of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT for imaging of various types of cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1210-1217"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10394316/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9921386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265471
Grayson Wass, Kari Clifford, Rathan M Subramaniam
Fibroblast-activation protein is a promising target for oncologic molecular imaging. Studies show that fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) radiotracers are accurate diagnostics with favorable tumor-to-background ratios across various cancers. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and metaanalysis to assess the diagnostic performance of FAPI PET/CT in comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT, the most widely used radiotracer in oncology. Methods: We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, relevant trial registries, and bibliographies. The search consisted of combinations of terms for 3 topics: neoplasia, PET/CT, and FAPI. Two authors independently screened retrieved articles using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted the data. Study quality was assessed using the criteria of QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2). For each study, the sensitivity, specificity, and 95% CIs were calculated to determine diagnostic accuracy for primary, nodal, and metastatic lesions. A random-effects metaanalysis was used for pooling the data, and heterogeneity was assessed (I2 index). Results: Thirty-nine studies (1,259 patients) investigating the use of FAPI PET/CT were included. On a patient-based analysis, pooled sensitivity was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.0) for the detection of primary lesions. Pooled sensitivity for nodal and distant metastases was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81-0.96) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-1.0), respectively. On a paired analysis between FAPI and [18F]FDG PET/CT, FAPI had a higher sensitivity in the detection of primary, nodal, and metastatic lesions (all P < 0.001). The differences in sensitivities between FAPI and [18F]FDG were statistically significant. In terms of heterogeneity, analyses on primary lesions were moderately affected, distant metastatic lesions were highly affected, and the nodal metastatic analyses had negligible heterogeneity. Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of FAPI PET/CT is superior to that of [18F]FDG in the detection of primary, nodal, and distant metastases. However, further studies are needed to better evaluate its utility and indication in specific cancer types and clinical settings.
{"title":"Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of FAPI PET/CT in Oncologic Studies: Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.","authors":"Grayson Wass, Kari Clifford, Rathan M Subramaniam","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.123.265471","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.265471","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fibroblast-activation protein is a promising target for oncologic molecular imaging. Studies show that fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) radiotracers are accurate diagnostics with favorable tumor-to-background ratios across various cancers. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and metaanalysis to assess the diagnostic performance of FAPI PET/CT in comparison with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, the most widely used radiotracer in oncology. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, relevant trial registries, and bibliographies. The search consisted of combinations of terms for 3 topics: neoplasia, PET/CT, and FAPI. Two authors independently screened retrieved articles using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted the data. Study quality was assessed using the criteria of QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2). For each study, the sensitivity, specificity, and 95% CIs were calculated to determine diagnostic accuracy for primary, nodal, and metastatic lesions. A random-effects metaanalysis was used for pooling the data, and heterogeneity was assessed (I<sup>2</sup> index). <b>Results:</b> Thirty-nine studies (1,259 patients) investigating the use of FAPI PET/CT were included. On a patient-based analysis, pooled sensitivity was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.0) for the detection of primary lesions. Pooled sensitivity for nodal and distant metastases was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81-0.96) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-1.0), respectively. On a paired analysis between FAPI and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, FAPI had a higher sensitivity in the detection of primary, nodal, and metastatic lesions (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). The differences in sensitivities between FAPI and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG were statistically significant. In terms of heterogeneity, analyses on primary lesions were moderately affected, distant metastatic lesions were highly affected, and the nodal metastatic analyses had negligible heterogeneity. <b>Conclusion:</b> The diagnostic performance of FAPI PET/CT is superior to that of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG in the detection of primary, nodal, and distant metastases. However, further studies are needed to better evaluate its utility and indication in specific cancer types and clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1218-1224"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10287894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265254
Milena Colovic, Hua Yang, Lily Southcott, Helen Merkens, Nadine Colpo, Francois Bénard, Paul Schaffer
System [Formula: see text] is an appealing biomarker for targeting oxidative stress with oncologic PET imaging and can serve as an alternative PET biomarker to other metabolic indicators. In this paper, we report a direct comparison of 2 18F-labeled amino acid radiopharmaceuticals targeting system [Formula: see text], [18F]5-fluoroaminosuberic acid ([18F]FASu) and (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-l-glutamate ([18F]FSPG), in terms of their uptake specificity and ability to image glioma and lung cancer xenografts in vivo. Methods: Both tracers were synthesized according to previously published procedures. In vitro uptake specificity assays were conducted using prostate (PC-3), glioblastoma (U-87), colorectal (HT-29), ovarian (SKOV3), breast (MDA-MB-231), and lung cancer (A549) cell lines. PET/CT imaging and biodistribution studies were conducted in immunocompromised mice bearing U-87 or A549 xenografts. Results: In vitro cell uptake assays showed that the tracers accumulated in cancer cells in a time-dependent manner and that the uptake of [18F]FASu was blocked by the system [Formula: see text] inhibitor sulfasalazine and rose bengal, but not by system L inhibitor 2-aminobicyclo-(2,2,1)-heptane-2-carboxylic acid, system [Formula: see text] inhibitor L-trans-pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylic acid, or l-serine, which is a substrate for transporter systems A, ACS, B0, and B0,+ Conversely, [18F]FSPG uptake decreased significantly in the presence of an excess of L-trans-pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylic acid in 2 of 3 tested cell lines, indicating some reliance on system [Formula: see text] in these cells. In an in vivo setting, [18F]FASu and [18F]FSPG generated good-contrast PET images in U-87 and A549 tumor-bearing mice. Tracer accumulation in A549 tumors was 5.0 ± 0.8 percentage injected dose (%ID)/g ([18F]FASu, n ≥ 5) and 6.3 ± 1.3 %ID/g ([18F]FSPG, n ≥ 6, P = 0.7786), whereas U-87 xenografts demonstrated uptake of 6.1 ± 2.4 %ID/g ([18F]FASu, n ≥ 4) and 11.2 ± 4.1 %ID/g ([18F]FSPG, n ≥ 4, P = 0.0321) at 1 h after injection. Conclusion: [18F]FSPG had greater in vitro uptake than [18F]FASu in all cell lines tested; however, our results indicate that residual uptake differences exist between [18F]FSPG and [18F]FASu, suggesting alternative transporter activity in the cell lines tested. In vivo studies demonstrated the ability of both [18F]FASu and [18F]FSPG to image glioblastoma (U-87) and non-small cell lung cancer (A549) xenografts.
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of [<sup>18</sup>F]5-Fluoroaminosuberic Acid and (4<i>S</i>)-4-3-[<sup>18</sup>F]fluoropropyl)-l-Glutamate as System xC--Targeting Radiopharmaceuticals.","authors":"Milena Colovic, Hua Yang, Lily Southcott, Helen Merkens, Nadine Colpo, Francois Bénard, Paul Schaffer","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.122.265254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.265254","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>System [Formula: see text] is an appealing biomarker for targeting oxidative stress with oncologic PET imaging and can serve as an alternative PET biomarker to other metabolic indicators. In this paper, we report a direct comparison of 2 <sup>18</sup>F-labeled amino acid radiopharmaceuticals targeting system [Formula: see text], [<sup>18</sup>F]5-fluoroaminosuberic acid ([<sup>18</sup>F]FASu) and (4<i>S</i>)-4-(3-[<sup>18</sup>F]fluoropropyl)-l-glutamate ([<sup>18</sup>F]FSPG), in terms of their uptake specificity and ability to image glioma and lung cancer xenografts in vivo. <b>Methods:</b> Both tracers were synthesized according to previously published procedures. In vitro uptake specificity assays were conducted using prostate (PC-3), glioblastoma (U-87), colorectal (HT-29), ovarian (SKOV3), breast (MDA-MB-231), and lung cancer (A549) cell lines. PET/CT imaging and biodistribution studies were conducted in immunocompromised mice bearing U-87 or A549 xenografts. <b>Results:</b> In vitro cell uptake assays showed that the tracers accumulated in cancer cells in a time-dependent manner and that the uptake of [<sup>18</sup>F]FASu was blocked by the system [Formula: see text] inhibitor sulfasalazine and rose bengal, but not by system L inhibitor 2-aminobicyclo-(2,2,1)-heptane-2-carboxylic acid, system [Formula: see text] inhibitor L-<i>trans</i>-pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylic acid, or l-serine, which is a substrate for transporter systems A, ACS, B<sup>0</sup>, and B<sup>0,+</sup> Conversely, [<sup>18</sup>F]FSPG uptake decreased significantly in the presence of an excess of L-<i>trans</i>-pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylic acid in 2 of 3 tested cell lines, indicating some reliance on system [Formula: see text] in these cells. In an in vivo setting, [<sup>18</sup>F]FASu and [<sup>18</sup>F]FSPG generated good-contrast PET images in U-87 and A549 tumor-bearing mice. Tracer accumulation in A549 tumors was 5.0 ± 0.8 percentage injected dose (%ID)/g ([<sup>18</sup>F]FASu, <i>n</i> ≥ 5) and 6.3 ± 1.3 %ID/g ([<sup>18</sup>F]FSPG, <i>n</i> ≥ 6, <i>P</i> = 0.7786), whereas U-87 xenografts demonstrated uptake of 6.1 ± 2.4 %ID/g ([<sup>18</sup>F]FASu, <i>n</i> ≥ 4) and 11.2 ± 4.1 %ID/g ([<sup>18</sup>F]FSPG, <i>n</i> ≥ 4, <i>P</i> = 0.0321) at 1 h after injection. <b>Conclusion:</b> [<sup>18</sup>F]FSPG had greater in vitro uptake than [<sup>18</sup>F]FASu in all cell lines tested; however, our results indicate that residual uptake differences exist between [<sup>18</sup>F]FSPG and [<sup>18</sup>F]FASu, suggesting alternative transporter activity in the cell lines tested. In vivo studies demonstrated the ability of both [<sup>18</sup>F]FASu and [<sup>18</sup>F]FSPG to image glioblastoma (U-87) and non-small cell lung cancer (A549) xenografts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1314-1321"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9930210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01Epub Date: 2023-06-02DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265280
Aaron R Selfridge, Benjamin A Spencer, Yasser G Abdelhafez, Keisuke Nakagawa, John D Tupin, Ramsey D Badawi
Total-body PET/CT images can be rendered to produce images of a subject's face and body. In response to privacy and identifiability concerns when sharing data, we have developed and validated a workflow that obscures (defaces) a subject's face in 3-dimensional volumetric data. Methods: To validate our method, we measured facial identifiability before and after defacing images from 30 healthy subjects who were imaged with both [18F]FDG PET and CT at either 3 or 6 time points. Briefly, facial embeddings were calculated using Google's FaceNet, and an analysis of clustering was used to estimate identifiability. Results: Faces rendered from CT images were correctly matched to CT scans at other time points at a rate of 93%, which decreased to 6% after defacing. Faces rendered from PET images were correctly matched to PET images at other time points at a maximum rate of 64% and to CT images at a maximum rate of 50%, both of which decreased to 7% after defacing. We further demonstrated that defaced CT images can be used for attenuation correction during PET reconstruction, introducing a maximum bias of -3.3% in regions of the cerebral cortex nearest the face. Conclusion: We believe that the proposed method provides a baseline of anonymity and discretion when sharing image data online or between institutions and will help to facilitate collaboration and future regulatory compliance.
全身正电子发射计算机断层显像/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)图像经渲染后可生成受试者的面部和身体图像。为了解决共享数据时的隐私和可识别性问题,我们开发并验证了一种在三维容积数据中模糊(玷污)受试者面部的工作流程。方法:为了验证我们的方法,我们测量了30名健康受试者在3个或6个时间点同时接受[18F]FDG PET和CT成像的图像去污前后的面部可识别性。简而言之,我们使用谷歌 FaceNet 计算了面部嵌入,并使用聚类分析估算了可识别性。结果:通过 CT 图像呈现的人脸与其他时间点的 CT 扫描的正确匹配率为 93%,而在污损后,正确匹配率降至 6%。通过 PET 图像呈现的人脸与其他时间点的 PET 图像的正确匹配率最高为 64%,与 CT 图像的正确匹配率最高为 50%,两者在污损后均降至 7%。我们进一步证明,玷污的 CT 图像可用于 PET 重建过程中的衰减校正,在最靠近面部的大脑皮层区域引入的最大偏差为 -3.3%。结论我们相信,所提出的方法为在线或机构间共享图像数据提供了一个匿名和谨慎的基线,并将有助于促进合作和未来的合规性。
{"title":"Facial Anonymization and Privacy Concerns in Total-Body PET/CT.","authors":"Aaron R Selfridge, Benjamin A Spencer, Yasser G Abdelhafez, Keisuke Nakagawa, John D Tupin, Ramsey D Badawi","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.122.265280","DOIUrl":"10.2967/jnumed.122.265280","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Total-body PET/CT images can be rendered to produce images of a subject's face and body. In response to privacy and identifiability concerns when sharing data, we have developed and validated a workflow that obscures (defaces) a subject's face in 3-dimensional volumetric data. <b>Methods:</b> To validate our method, we measured facial identifiability before and after defacing images from 30 healthy subjects who were imaged with both [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET and CT at either 3 or 6 time points. Briefly, facial embeddings were calculated using Google's FaceNet, and an analysis of clustering was used to estimate identifiability. <b>Results:</b> Faces rendered from CT images were correctly matched to CT scans at other time points at a rate of 93%, which decreased to 6% after defacing. Faces rendered from PET images were correctly matched to PET images at other time points at a maximum rate of 64% and to CT images at a maximum rate of 50%, both of which decreased to 7% after defacing. We further demonstrated that defaced CT images can be used for attenuation correction during PET reconstruction, introducing a maximum bias of -3.3% in regions of the cerebral cortex nearest the face. <b>Conclusion:</b> We believe that the proposed method provides a baseline of anonymity and discretion when sharing image data online or between institutions and will help to facilitate collaboration and future regulatory compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1304-1309"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10394314/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9933184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265414
Swayamjeet Satapathy, Ranjit K Sahoo, Chandrasekhar Bal
Radioligand therapy (RLT) with 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) inhibitors ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA) is currently approved for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after progression with at least 1 taxane and 1 androgen-receptor-pathway inhibitor. However, the impact of prior chemotherapy on [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT outcomes is debatable, with various studies showing inconsistent results. This study was conducted to precisely evaluate the impact of prior taxane chemotherapy on response and survival outcomes in mCRPC patients after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT. Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were made using relevant key words, and articles up to December 2022 were included. The endpoints included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR), progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Individual patient data were pooled when feasible. Univariate odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted from the individual articles, and pooled estimates and 95% CIs were generated using metaanalysis. Results: Thirteen articles comprising 2,068 patients were included. In 6 articles (553 patients), taxane-naïve patients had significantly better odds of biochemical response after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT (pooled OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.21-2.71). Individual patient data metaanalysis for PSA RRs in 3 articles revealed a significantly higher PSA RR in the taxane-naïve versus taxane-treated patients (57.1% vs. 39.5%; difference, 17.6%; 95% CI, 5.6%-28.9%). Further, taxane-naïve status was also a predictor of significantly better progression-free survival (5 articles; 1,027 patients; pooled HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51-0.69) and OS (8 articles; 1,594 patients; pooled HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43-0.68) after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT. There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusion: mCRPC patients with no prior taxanes had significantly better outcomes after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT than did taxane-treated patients. Further trials evaluating [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT in the taxane-naïve setting are now required.
{"title":"[<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-Radioligand Therapy Efficacy Outcomes in Taxane-Naïve Versus Taxane-Treated Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.","authors":"Swayamjeet Satapathy, Ranjit K Sahoo, Chandrasekhar Bal","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.123.265414","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.265414","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radioligand therapy (RLT) with <sup>177</sup>Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) inhibitors ([<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA) is currently approved for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after progression with at least 1 taxane and 1 androgen-receptor-pathway inhibitor. However, the impact of prior chemotherapy on [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT outcomes is debatable, with various studies showing inconsistent results. This study was conducted to precisely evaluate the impact of prior taxane chemotherapy on response and survival outcomes in mCRPC patients after [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT. <b>Methods:</b> This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were made using relevant key words, and articles up to December 2022 were included. The endpoints included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR), progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Individual patient data were pooled when feasible. Univariate odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted from the individual articles, and pooled estimates and 95% CIs were generated using metaanalysis. <b>Results:</b> Thirteen articles comprising 2,068 patients were included. In 6 articles (553 patients), taxane-naïve patients had significantly better odds of biochemical response after [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT (pooled OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.21-2.71). Individual patient data metaanalysis for PSA RRs in 3 articles revealed a significantly higher PSA RR in the taxane-naïve versus taxane-treated patients (57.1% vs. 39.5%; difference, 17.6%; 95% CI, 5.6%-28.9%). Further, taxane-naïve status was also a predictor of significantly better progression-free survival (5 articles; 1,027 patients; pooled HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51-0.69) and OS (8 articles; 1,594 patients; pooled HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43-0.68) after [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT. There was no evidence of publication bias. <b>Conclusion:</b> mCRPC patients with no prior taxanes had significantly better outcomes after [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT than did taxane-treated patients. Further trials evaluating [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT in the taxane-naïve setting are now required.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1266-1271"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9921390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265077
Phillip H Kuo, Don C Yoo, Ryan Avery, Marc Seltzer, Jeremie Calais, James Nagarajah, Wolfgang A Weber, Wolfgang P Fendler, Michael S Hofman, Bernd J Krause, Marcia Brackman, Euloge Kpamegan, Samson Ghebremariam, Taylor Benson, Ana M Catafau, Ayse T Kendi
[ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 ( 68Ga-PSMA-11) is used to identify prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive tumors on PET scans. In the VISION study, 68Ga-PSMA-11 was used to determine the eligibility of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer for treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617), based on predefined read criteria. This substudy aimed to investigate the interreader variability and intrareader reproducibility of visual assessments of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans using the VISION read criteria and evaluate the agreement between read results for this and the VISION study. Methods: In VISION, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans were centrally read as inclusion cases if they had at least 1 PSMA-positive lesion and no PSMA-negative lesions that fulfilled the exclusion criteria. In this substudy, 125 PET/CT scans (75 inclusion and 50 exclusion cases) were randomly selected from VISION and retrospectively assessed by 3 independent central readers. A random subset of 20 cases (12 inclusion and 8 exclusion cases) was recoded for assessment of intrareader reproducibility. Classification of cases as inclusion or exclusion cases was based on the VISION read criteria. Overall interreader variability was assessed by Fleiss κ-statistics, and pairwise variability and intrareader reproducibility were assessed by Cohen κ-statistics. Results: For interreader variability, the readers agreed on 77% of cases (overall average agreement rate, 0.85; Fleiss κ, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.50-0.70]). The pairwise agreement rate was 0.82, 0.88, and 0.84, and the corresponding Cohen κ was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.38-0.71), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52-0.83), and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.43-0.75), respectively. For intrareader reproducibility, the agreement rate was 0.90, 0.90, and 0.95, and the corresponding Cohen κ was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.49-0.99), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.46-0.99), and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.67-0.99), respectively. The number of actual VISION inclusion cases out of the total number of cases scored as inclusion in this substudy was 71 of 93 (agreement rate, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.85) for reader 1, 70 of 88 (0.80; 0.70-0.87) for reader 2, and 73 of 96 (0.76; 0.66-0.84) for reader 3. All readers agreed on 66 of 75 VISION inclusion cases. Conclusion: Moderate-to-substantial interreader agreement and substantial-to-almost perfect intrareader reproducibility for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan assessment using the VISION read criteria were observed. The read rules applied in VISION can be readily learned and demonstrate good reproducibility.
{"title":"A VISION Substudy of Reader Agreement on <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Scan Interpretation to Determine Patient Eligibility for <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy.","authors":"Phillip H Kuo, Don C Yoo, Ryan Avery, Marc Seltzer, Jeremie Calais, James Nagarajah, Wolfgang A Weber, Wolfgang P Fendler, Michael S Hofman, Bernd J Krause, Marcia Brackman, Euloge Kpamegan, Samson Ghebremariam, Taylor Benson, Ana M Catafau, Ayse T Kendi","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.122.265077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.265077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[ <sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 ( <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11) is used to identify prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive tumors on PET scans. In the VISION study, <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 was used to determine the eligibility of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer for treatment with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (<sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617), based on predefined read criteria. This substudy aimed to investigate the interreader variability and intrareader reproducibility of visual assessments of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans using the VISION read criteria and evaluate the agreement between read results for this and the VISION study. <b>Methods:</b> In VISION, <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans were centrally read as inclusion cases if they had at least 1 PSMA-positive lesion and no PSMA-negative lesions that fulfilled the exclusion criteria. In this substudy, 125 PET/CT scans (75 inclusion and 50 exclusion cases) were randomly selected from VISION and retrospectively assessed by 3 independent central readers. A random subset of 20 cases (12 inclusion and 8 exclusion cases) was recoded for assessment of intrareader reproducibility. Classification of cases as inclusion or exclusion cases was based on the VISION read criteria. Overall interreader variability was assessed by Fleiss κ-statistics, and pairwise variability and intrareader reproducibility were assessed by Cohen κ-statistics. <b>Results:</b> For interreader variability, the readers agreed on 77% of cases (overall average agreement rate, 0.85; Fleiss κ, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.50-0.70]). The pairwise agreement rate was 0.82, 0.88, and 0.84, and the corresponding Cohen κ was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.38-0.71), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52-0.83), and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.43-0.75), respectively. For intrareader reproducibility, the agreement rate was 0.90, 0.90, and 0.95, and the corresponding Cohen κ was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.49-0.99), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.46-0.99), and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.67-0.99), respectively. The number of actual VISION inclusion cases out of the total number of cases scored as inclusion in this substudy was 71 of 93 (agreement rate, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.85) for reader 1, 70 of 88 (0.80; 0.70-0.87) for reader 2, and 73 of 96 (0.76; 0.66-0.84) for reader 3. All readers agreed on 66 of 75 VISION inclusion cases. <b>Conclusion:</b> Moderate-to-substantial interreader agreement and substantial-to-almost perfect intrareader reproducibility for <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan assessment using the VISION read criteria were observed. The read rules applied in VISION can be readily learned and demonstrate good reproducibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1259-1265"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10394308/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9921418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265161
Gregor Zaun, Manuel Weber, Martin Metzenmacher, Marcel Wiesweg, Thomas Hilser, Yasmin Zaun, Sven Liffers, Michael Pogorzelski, Isabel Virchow, Wilfried Eberhardt, Sarah Theurer, Tanja Abu Sabbah, Timm M Reissig, Martin Stuschke, Cornelius Kürten, Timon Hussain, Stephan Lang, Stefan Kasper, Wolfgang P Fendler, Ken Herrmann, Martin Schuler
Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous entity with a limited prognosis. Novel prognostic markers are needed for patient stratification in prospective clinical trials exploring innovative therapies. Methods: In CUP patients treated at the West German Cancer Center Essen, the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT at the initial diagnostic workup was analyzed by comparing overall survival (OS) in patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT with those who did not. Results: Of 154 patients with a CUP diagnosis, 76 underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT at the initial diagnostic workup. The median overall survival (OS) of the full analysis set was 20.0 mo. Within the PET/CT subgroup, an SUVmax above 20 was associated with significantly superior OS (median OS, not reached vs. 32.0 mo; hazard ratio, 0.261; 95% CI, 0.095-0.713; P = 0.009). Conclusion: Our retrospective work shows that an SUVmax above 20 on 18F-FDG PET/CT at the initial diagnostic workup is a favorable prognostic factor in patients with CUP. This finding deserves further prospective studies for validation.
{"title":"SUV<sub>max</sub> Above 20 in <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT at Initial Diagnostic Workup Associates with Favorable Survival in Patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary.","authors":"Gregor Zaun, Manuel Weber, Martin Metzenmacher, Marcel Wiesweg, Thomas Hilser, Yasmin Zaun, Sven Liffers, Michael Pogorzelski, Isabel Virchow, Wilfried Eberhardt, Sarah Theurer, Tanja Abu Sabbah, Timm M Reissig, Martin Stuschke, Cornelius Kürten, Timon Hussain, Stephan Lang, Stefan Kasper, Wolfgang P Fendler, Ken Herrmann, Martin Schuler","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.122.265161","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.265161","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous entity with a limited prognosis. Novel prognostic markers are needed for patient stratification in prospective clinical trials exploring innovative therapies. <b>Methods:</b> In CUP patients treated at the West German Cancer Center Essen, the prognostic value of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT at the initial diagnostic workup was analyzed by comparing overall survival (OS) in patients who underwent <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT with those who did not. <b>Results:</b> Of 154 patients with a CUP diagnosis, 76 underwent <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT at the initial diagnostic workup. The median overall survival (OS) of the full analysis set was 20.0 mo. Within the PET/CT subgroup, an SUV<sub>max</sub> above 20 was associated with significantly superior OS (median OS, not reached vs. 32.0 mo; hazard ratio, 0.261; 95% CI, 0.095-0.713; <i>P</i> = 0.009). <b>Conclusion:</b> Our retrospective work shows that an SUV<sub>max</sub> above 20 on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT at the initial diagnostic workup is a favorable prognostic factor in patients with CUP. This finding deserves further prospective studies for validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1191-1194"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9930782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01Epub Date: 2023-07-13DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265209
Samantha Delaney, Joni Sebastiano, Brian M Zeglis, Outi M Keinänen
The worldwide proliferation of persistent environmental pollutants is accelerating at an alarming rate. Not surprisingly, many of these pollutants pose a risk to human health. In this review, we examine recent literature in which molecular imaging and radiochemistry have been harnessed to study environmental pollutants. Specifically, these techniques offer unique ways to interrogate the pharmacokinetic profiles and bioaccumulation patterns of pollutants at environmentally relevant concentrations, thereby helping to determine their potential health risks.
{"title":"Molecular Imaging, Radiochemistry, and Environmental Pollutants.","authors":"Samantha Delaney, Joni Sebastiano, Brian M Zeglis, Outi M Keinänen","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.122.265209","DOIUrl":"10.2967/jnumed.122.265209","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The worldwide proliferation of persistent environmental pollutants is accelerating at an alarming rate. Not surprisingly, many of these pollutants pose a risk to human health. In this review, we examine recent literature in which molecular imaging and radiochemistry have been harnessed to study environmental pollutants. Specifically, these techniques offer unique ways to interrogate the pharmacokinetic profiles and bioaccumulation patterns of pollutants at environmentally relevant concentrations, thereby helping to determine their potential health risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1179-1184"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10394311/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9934252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265717
Dale L Bailey
TO THE EDITOR: Regarding “Adverse Clinical Events at the Injection Site Are Exceedingly Rare After Reported Radiopharmaceutical Extravasation in Patients Undergoing Tc-MDP WholeBody Bone Scintigraphy: A 12-Year Experience” (1), I read this article with some interest from a purely scientific perspective. I am concerned that the results reported might be used to justify certain courses of action, or inaction, without the evidence to support these approaches. I have several misgivings about this article. First, thenumbers thathavebeenreportedfor inclusion in this study are likely to be significantly underestimated. Of the approximately 32,000scans that theauthorsexamined, they found118casesofdocumentedextravasation in theclinical reports, ofwhichonly96couldbe followed up. The authors cite other audits of bone scan administrations that quote extravasation rates of around 15%–20% in routine clinical practice. On the basis of the 15%–20% rate, the number of extravasations should have been more like 4,750–6,300 cases in the 12-y cohort. A rate of 15%–20% seems, from my experience, to be not unexpected for some degree of extravasation at the injection site. As the authors have included only patients for whom an extravasation had been noted in the clinical report—a notation that is rarely made—they acknowledge that this could lead to an underestimation of the incidence of extravasation. Indeed, the authors state that “this approach has the possibility [my emphasis] of missing studies in which [a radiopharmaceutical extravasation] occurred but was not documented in the report.”The lackofdocumentationby the reporting physicians may be because the technologist or nurse injecting the patient did not recognize the extravasation at the time of injection (often due to the low injected volumes used) and, hence, the extravasationwasdetected onlywhen the scanwasacquired somehours later. This is a serious underestimate and tends to undermine the authors’ conclusions. Second, the authors have little clinical or other follow-up information on extravasations that were not documented (assuming the true incidence of around 5,000–6,000 is correct) and seem to assume that if they did not hear anything from the patient then there was no problem. I propose that it is likely most extravasations will not lead to any significant unintended acute or chronic tissue damage but that just because one does not follow up about extravasation does not mean one has evidence of no extravasation issues. The authors may suggest that, on the basis of my estimates, in a cohort of 5,000–6,000 individuals the authors would likely learn of an adverse event even if there is only the slightest possibility of it. However, in complex, fragmented health-care systems, the feedback between primary-care and secondary or tertiary service providers is often tenuous at best, and many primary-care practitioners may not make a connection between the bone scan performed 1mo previously and the ongoing issue at
{"title":"Radiopharmaceutical Extravasations Can Have Consequences.","authors":"Dale L Bailey","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.123.265717","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.265717","url":null,"abstract":"TO THE EDITOR: Regarding “Adverse Clinical Events at the Injection Site Are Exceedingly Rare After Reported Radiopharmaceutical Extravasation in Patients Undergoing Tc-MDP WholeBody Bone Scintigraphy: A 12-Year Experience” (1), I read this article with some interest from a purely scientific perspective. I am concerned that the results reported might be used to justify certain courses of action, or inaction, without the evidence to support these approaches. I have several misgivings about this article. First, thenumbers thathavebeenreportedfor inclusion in this study are likely to be significantly underestimated. Of the approximately 32,000scans that theauthorsexamined, they found118casesofdocumentedextravasation in theclinical reports, ofwhichonly96couldbe followed up. The authors cite other audits of bone scan administrations that quote extravasation rates of around 15%–20% in routine clinical practice. On the basis of the 15%–20% rate, the number of extravasations should have been more like 4,750–6,300 cases in the 12-y cohort. A rate of 15%–20% seems, from my experience, to be not unexpected for some degree of extravasation at the injection site. As the authors have included only patients for whom an extravasation had been noted in the clinical report—a notation that is rarely made—they acknowledge that this could lead to an underestimation of the incidence of extravasation. Indeed, the authors state that “this approach has the possibility [my emphasis] of missing studies in which [a radiopharmaceutical extravasation] occurred but was not documented in the report.”The lackofdocumentationby the reporting physicians may be because the technologist or nurse injecting the patient did not recognize the extravasation at the time of injection (often due to the low injected volumes used) and, hence, the extravasationwasdetected onlywhen the scanwasacquired somehours later. This is a serious underestimate and tends to undermine the authors’ conclusions. Second, the authors have little clinical or other follow-up information on extravasations that were not documented (assuming the true incidence of around 5,000–6,000 is correct) and seem to assume that if they did not hear anything from the patient then there was no problem. I propose that it is likely most extravasations will not lead to any significant unintended acute or chronic tissue damage but that just because one does not follow up about extravasation does not mean one has evidence of no extravasation issues. The authors may suggest that, on the basis of my estimates, in a cohort of 5,000–6,000 individuals the authors would likely learn of an adverse event even if there is only the slightest possibility of it. However, in complex, fragmented health-care systems, the feedback between primary-care and secondary or tertiary service providers is often tenuous at best, and many primary-care practitioners may not make a connection between the bone scan performed 1mo previously and the ongoing issue at","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"64 8","pages":"1324"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9928177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}