Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-06-14DOI: 10.1177/08971900241262359
Cassidy H Padgett, G Shawn King, R Ethan Hughes, Megan N Hull, Eliseo A Colon
Purpose: Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are associated with an increased length of stay and a higher risk of mortality in hospitalized patients. A lack of literature exists that evaluates the need to empirically cover patients for historic MDROs upon readmission. Methods: A retrospective, single-center, cohort study was conducted to evaluate the impact of empiric MDRO antibiotic coverage in patients with a history of MDROs. Differences in length of stay were assessed between two groups of patients: those empirically treated for their historic MDRO and those not. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay, need for antibiotic escalation, need for antibiotic de-escalation, and antibiotic duration. Results: Seventy-two patients with historic MDRO(s) were readmitted to the hospital and met inclusion criteria for this study. Hospital length of stay was similar between those empirically covered and those not (11 days vs 15.1 days; P = 0.149). When analyzed in a population only including Gram-negative MDROs, hospital length of stay was shorter in those who received empiric coverage (10.7 days vs 17.2 days; P = 0.032). Conclusion: In the total study population, empiric coverage of historic MDROs failed to significantly reduce hospital length of stay. When analyzed in a population of only Gram-negative MDROs, empiric coverage of historic organisms reduced hospital length of stay by 6.5 days. This suggests that in patients readmitted to the ICU for sepsis, empiric coverage of historic Gram-negative MDROs may be beneficial.
{"title":"Evaluation of Empiric Coverage of Previously Cultured Multidrug Resistant Organisms in Critically Ill Patients Admitted for Sepsis.","authors":"Cassidy H Padgett, G Shawn King, R Ethan Hughes, Megan N Hull, Eliseo A Colon","doi":"10.1177/08971900241262359","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08971900241262359","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>: Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are associated with an increased length of stay and a higher risk of mortality in hospitalized patients. A lack of literature exists that evaluates the need to empirically cover patients for historic MDROs upon readmission. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective, single-center, cohort study was conducted to evaluate the impact of empiric MDRO antibiotic coverage in patients with a history of MDROs. Differences in length of stay were assessed between two groups of patients: those empirically treated for their historic MDRO and those not. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay, need for antibiotic escalation, need for antibiotic de-escalation, and antibiotic duration. <b>Results:</b> Seventy-two patients with historic MDRO(s) were readmitted to the hospital and met inclusion criteria for this study. Hospital length of stay was similar between those empirically covered and those not (11 days vs 15.1 days; <i>P = 0.149</i>). When analyzed in a population only including Gram-negative MDROs, hospital length of stay was shorter in those who received empiric coverage (10.7 days vs 17.2 days; <i>P = 0.032</i>). <b>Conclusion:</b> In the total study population, empiric coverage of historic MDROs failed to significantly reduce hospital length of stay. When analyzed in a population of only Gram-negative MDROs, empiric coverage of historic organisms reduced hospital length of stay by 6.5 days. This suggests that in patients readmitted to the ICU for sepsis, empiric coverage of historic Gram-negative MDROs may be beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"1331-1336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141320982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-05-28DOI: 10.1177/08971900241256725
Jennifer D Goldman
Objective: This review aims to emphasize the role of pharmacists for optimization of evidence-based outcomes of finerenone in multidisciplinary kidney care teams during the early detection process of CKD patients. Data Sources: A PubMed literature search was performed using keywords pharmacists, chronic kidney disease (CKD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and finerenone. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All English-language studies on the role of pharmacists in managing CKD patients or finerenone prescriptions were evaluated. Data Synthesis: CKD is a major health problem affecting millions worldwide, especially those with T2D. In recent years, new drugs have been added to the treatment options for patients with T2D and CKD, which have been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular and renal complications in large clinical trials. Conclusions: Pharmacists can help detect and treat CKD in patients with T2D. They may use indicators to identify potential candidates for appropriate finerenone therapy, such as stage of CKD, albuminuria level, serum potassium concentration, and use of RAAS inhibitors. Pharmacists can provide education on the benefits and usage of finerenone, monitor response to therapy, adjust the medications and doses, prevent drug interactions, help with adherence and tolerability issues, and coordinate with other healthcare providers.
{"title":"Optimizing Finerenone in People With Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: An Opportunity for the Pharmacist.","authors":"Jennifer D Goldman","doi":"10.1177/08971900241256725","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08971900241256725","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This review aims to emphasize the role of pharmacists for optimization of evidence-based outcomes of finerenone in multidisciplinary kidney care teams during the early detection process of CKD patients. <b>Data Sources:</b> A PubMed literature search was performed using keywords pharmacists, chronic kidney disease (CKD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and finerenone. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All English-language studies on the role of pharmacists in managing CKD patients or finerenone prescriptions were evaluated. <b>Data Synthesis:</b> CKD is a major health problem affecting millions worldwide, especially those with T2D. In recent years, new drugs have been added to the treatment options for patients with T2D and CKD, which have been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular and renal complications in large clinical trials. <b>Conclusions:</b> Pharmacists can help detect and treat CKD in patients with T2D. They may use indicators to identify potential candidates for appropriate finerenone therapy, such as stage of CKD, albuminuria level, serum potassium concentration, and use of RAAS inhibitors. Pharmacists can provide education on the benefits and usage of finerenone, monitor response to therapy, adjust the medications and doses, prevent drug interactions, help with adherence and tolerability issues, and coordinate with other healthcare providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"1374-1379"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497730/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141159871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-05-08DOI: 10.1177/08971900241247619
Brielle Stawicki, Tyler Schacher, Anna Dushenkov, Paiboon Jungsuwadee
The promising results seen in the treatment of refractory hematologic malignancies with tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah), the pioneering Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy, has stimulated a fast growth in research and clinical testing of novel CAR-T constructs, targets, and various generations of CAR T-cells. Pharmacists may receive inquiries about active clinical trials or may be contributing to the care of patients participating in these studies. This briefing discusses the on-going clinical trials that explore novel CAR T-cell immunotherapies in pediatric refractory malignancies of hematologic and solid organ origins. It can be valuable in assisting practitioners in navigating the rapidly evolving field of CAR T-cell immunotherapies.
Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah)是嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞免疫疗法的先驱,它在治疗难治性血液恶性肿瘤方面取得了令人鼓舞的成果,这刺激了新型 CAR-T 构建、靶点和各代 CAR T 细胞研究和临床试验的快速发展。药剂师可能会收到有关正在进行的临床试验的咨询,也可能要为参与这些研究的患者提供护理。本简报讨论了正在进行的临床试验,这些试验探讨了新型 CAR T 细胞免疫疗法在小儿难治性血液和实体器官恶性肿瘤中的应用。它可以帮助从业人员了解快速发展的 CAR T 细胞免疫疗法领域。
{"title":"Briefing on Investigational Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Immunotherapies in Pediatric Neoplasms.","authors":"Brielle Stawicki, Tyler Schacher, Anna Dushenkov, Paiboon Jungsuwadee","doi":"10.1177/08971900241247619","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08971900241247619","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The promising results seen in the treatment of refractory hematologic malignancies with tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah), the pioneering Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy, has stimulated a fast growth in research and clinical testing of novel CAR-T constructs, targets, and various generations of CAR T-cells. Pharmacists may receive inquiries about active clinical trials or may be contributing to the care of patients participating in these studies. This briefing discusses the on-going clinical trials that explore novel CAR T-cell immunotherapies in pediatric refractory malignancies of hematologic and solid organ origins. It can be valuable in assisting practitioners in navigating the rapidly evolving field of CAR T-cell immunotherapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"1346-1360"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140892231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-05-27DOI: 10.1177/08971900241257296
Caitlin Dowd-Green, Dannielle Brown, Alexandra Wilson, Michael Streiff
Background: Several studies have examined INR fluctuations using pharmacokinetic (PK) models or post-hoc INR values after completing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, but further study of the effects of the drug interaction with warfarin during treatment is necessary. Case Summary: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is largely utilized in the outpatient setting so data regarding INR trends in hospitalized patients on warfarin is limited. However, many who receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir outpatient experience difficulty with presenting to clinic for INR checks due to feeling acutely ill along with isolation precautions. We present the case of a patient receiving warfarin and utilizing home INR testing for monitoring. After diagnosis of coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), she was started on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir on day five after testing positive. Most recent INR prior to the start of therapy was 2.7 and had been stable on the same dose for months prior to infection. On day two of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, her INR rose to 4.0 on home point of care INR testing. Despite reducing her dose of warfarin by 15%, her INR remained supratherapeutic the day after completing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (4.0) and for several checks after. One month after completion of therapy, her INR returned to therapeutic levels. Practice Implications: While PK models and case series have hypothesized both potential increases or decreases in INR with the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and warfarin interaction, COVID-19 infection itself can cause several pharmacodynamic changes which can increase INR, including decreased appetite and, in severe cases, organ dysfunction. This case provides real-world insight into the drug interaction between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and the drug-disease state interaction between warfarin and COVID-19.
{"title":"Supratherapeutic INR During Treatment With Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir and Warfarin and Acute Illness With COVID-19: A Case Report.","authors":"Caitlin Dowd-Green, Dannielle Brown, Alexandra Wilson, Michael Streiff","doi":"10.1177/08971900241257296","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08971900241257296","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Several studies have examined INR fluctuations using pharmacokinetic (PK) models or post-hoc INR values after completing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, but further study of the effects of the drug interaction with warfarin during treatment is necessary. <b>Case Summary</b>: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is largely utilized in the outpatient setting so data regarding INR trends in hospitalized patients on warfarin is limited. However, many who receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir outpatient experience difficulty with presenting to clinic for INR checks due to feeling acutely ill along with isolation precautions. We present the case of a patient receiving warfarin and utilizing home INR testing for monitoring. After diagnosis of coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), she was started on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir on day five after testing positive. Most recent INR prior to the start of therapy was 2.7 and had been stable on the same dose for months prior to infection. On day two of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, her INR rose to 4.0 on home point of care INR testing. Despite reducing her dose of warfarin by 15%, her INR remained supratherapeutic the day after completing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (4.0) and for several checks after. One month after completion of therapy, her INR returned to therapeutic levels. <b>Practice Implications</b>: While PK models and case series have hypothesized both potential increases or decreases in INR with the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and warfarin interaction, COVID-19 infection itself can cause several pharmacodynamic changes which can increase INR, including decreased appetite and, in severe cases, organ dysfunction. This case provides real-world insight into the drug interaction between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and the drug-disease state interaction between warfarin and COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"1414-1418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141158186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-05-08DOI: 10.1177/08971900241253661
Marci Wood, Amanda G Kennedy, Sidra Khan, Juvena R Hitt, Kayla Davis, Sheela S Reddy, Matthew P Gilbert
Background: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) help manage type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and may have efficacy in steatotic liver disease. Objective: To determine the prevalence and clinical impact of GLP-1 RA use in patients with T2DM and liver disease. Methods: This was a retrospective study of adult patients with T2DM and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL), or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) between 1/1/21-12/31/21. Patients with hepatitis B or C, or on pioglitazone were excluded. Eligible patients treated with a GLP-1 RA were compared to controls. The primary outcome was change in Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score, with NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) as a secondary outcome. Follow-up scores were calculated from labs within 3 to 15 months after baseline. Results: Of 242 eligible patients, 79 patients (32.6%) were treated with a GLP-1 RA. At baseline, FIB-4 score was lower and NFS was higher in the GLP-1 RA group vs controls (1.80 vs 2.33; P = .101, .36 vs -.47, P < .001; respectively). At follow up, FIB-4 score decreased to 1.77 in the GLP-1 RA group and increased to 2.71 in controls (P = .045). Follow up NFS was stable in the GLP-1 RA group and increased in the control group (.36 vs -.43; P = .308). Conclusion: Patients treated with GLP-1 RAs had less evidence of liver fibrosis progression compared to no treatment, although the differences were small. These results suggest that treatment with GLP-1 RAs may have clinical impact on slowing liver fibrosis, however results should be confirmed in a larger, more diverse sample.
背景:胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)有助于控制 2 型糖尿病(T2DM),并可能对脂肪肝有疗效。目的确定 GLP-1 RA 在 T2DM 和肝病患者中的使用率和临床影响。方法: 这是一项回顾性研究:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象为 1/1/21-12/31/21 期间患有 T2DM 和非酒精性脂肪肝 (NAFLD)、非酒精性脂肪肝 (NAFL) 或非酒精性脂肪性肝炎 (NASH) 的成年患者。乙型肝炎或丙型肝炎患者或服用吡格列酮的患者除外。接受 GLP-1 RA 治疗的合格患者与对照组进行比较。主要结果是纤维化-4(FIB-4)评分的变化,非酒精性脂肪肝纤维化评分(NFS)是次要结果。随访评分根据基线后3至15个月内的化验结果计算。结果:在242名符合条件的患者中,79名患者(32.6%)接受了GLP-1 RA治疗。基线时,GLP-1 RA组与对照组相比,FIB-4评分更低,NFS更高(分别为1.80 vs 2.33; P = .101, .36 vs -.47, P < .001;)。随访时,GLP-1 RA 组的 FIB-4 评分降至 1.77,而对照组则升至 2.71(P = .045)。随访时,GLP-1 RA 组的 NFS 保持稳定,对照组则有所上升(.36 vs -.43; P = .308)。结论与未接受治疗的患者相比,接受GLP-1 RA治疗的患者肝纤维化进展的证据较少,尽管差异很小。这些结果表明,使用GLP-1 RAs治疗可能会对减缓肝纤维化产生临床影响,但结果应在更大范围、更多样化的样本中得到证实。
{"title":"Impact of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use in Patients With Steatotic Liver Disease and Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Marci Wood, Amanda G Kennedy, Sidra Khan, Juvena R Hitt, Kayla Davis, Sheela S Reddy, Matthew P Gilbert","doi":"10.1177/08971900241253661","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08971900241253661","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) help manage type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and may have efficacy in steatotic liver disease. <b>Objective:</b> To determine the prevalence and clinical impact of GLP-1 RA use in patients with T2DM and liver disease. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective study of adult patients with T2DM and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL), or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) between 1/1/21-12/31/21. Patients with hepatitis B or C, or on pioglitazone were excluded. Eligible patients treated with a GLP-1 RA were compared to controls. The primary outcome was change in Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score, with NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) as a secondary outcome. Follow-up scores were calculated from labs within 3 to 15 months after baseline. <b>Results:</b> Of 242 eligible patients, 79 patients (32.6%) were treated with a GLP-1 RA. At baseline, FIB-4 score was lower and NFS was higher in the GLP-1 RA group vs controls (1.80 vs 2.33; P = .101, .36 vs -.47, P < .001; respectively). At follow up, FIB-4 score decreased to 1.77 in the GLP-1 RA group and increased to 2.71 in controls (P = .045). Follow up NFS was stable in the GLP-1 RA group and increased in the control group (.36 vs -.43; P = .308). <b>Conclusion:</b> Patients treated with GLP-1 RAs had less evidence of liver fibrosis progression compared to no treatment, although the differences were small. These results suggest that treatment with GLP-1 RAs may have clinical impact on slowing liver fibrosis, however results should be confirmed in a larger, more diverse sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"1297-1302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140892247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-04-29DOI: 10.1177/08971900241247598
Jodi P Hansgen, Megan L Robertson, Ellen M Verzino, Lindsay M Manning
Background: Opioid overdoses decrease when communities have access to naloxone. Clinicians play a key role in offering naloxone to high-risk chronic opioid patients. Managed care pharmacists within our health plan noted disproportionate processing for claims of opioid utilizers compared to claims of naloxone prescriptions. Objective: To increase naloxone access and prescribing to members who classify at a dosage with a higher risk for opioid overdose, defined as over 90 morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Methods: Multiple system-wide initiatives were implemented to improve naloxone access. A claims file was pulled monthly to identify members on opioids meeting MME criteria >90 MME per day excluding members with cancer, sickle cell disease, or on hospice. A separate report was then matched to naloxone claims and prescribing percentages calculated. Results: 12 444 utilizing members on opioids were identified from June 2019 prescription claims data. Of these, 131 were on opioids exceeding 90 MME per day, or 1.05% of utilizers, and the percentage of members exceeding 90 MME per day prescribed naloxone was 6.87%. By May 2023, the percentage of opioid utilizers exceeding 90 MME per day decreased to 0.58%. Naloxone prescribing increased to 41.18%. Conclusion: A multi-pronged approach to improve access to naloxone and continued educational efforts by our health plan increased naloxone prescribing in members on opioids exceeding 90 MME per day.
{"title":"Increasing Naloxone Access and Prescribing for Patients on High-Dose Opioids From a Managed Care Pharmacy Health Plan Perspective.","authors":"Jodi P Hansgen, Megan L Robertson, Ellen M Verzino, Lindsay M Manning","doi":"10.1177/08971900241247598","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08971900241247598","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Opioid overdoses decrease when communities have access to naloxone. Clinicians play a key role in offering naloxone to high-risk chronic opioid patients. Managed care pharmacists within our health plan noted disproportionate processing for claims of opioid utilizers compared to claims of naloxone prescriptions. <b>Objective:</b> To increase naloxone access and prescribing to members who classify at a dosage with a higher risk for opioid overdose, defined as over 90 morphine milligram equivalents (MME). <b>Methods:</b> Multiple system-wide initiatives were implemented to improve naloxone access. A claims file was pulled monthly to identify members on opioids meeting MME criteria >90 MME per day excluding members with cancer, sickle cell disease, or on hospice. A separate report was then matched to naloxone claims and prescribing percentages calculated. <b>Results:</b> 12 444 utilizing members on opioids were identified from June 2019 prescription claims data. Of these, 131 were on opioids exceeding 90 MME per day, or 1.05% of utilizers, and the percentage of members exceeding 90 MME per day prescribed naloxone was 6.87%. By May 2023, the percentage of opioid utilizers exceeding 90 MME per day decreased to 0.58%. Naloxone prescribing increased to 41.18%. <b>Conclusion:</b> A multi-pronged approach to improve access to naloxone and continued educational efforts by our health plan increased naloxone prescribing in members on opioids exceeding 90 MME per day.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"1291-1296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140849993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-04-29DOI: 10.1177/08971900241248862
Hannah Naguib, Goni Katz-Greenberg, Matt Harris, Jennifer Gommer, Lexie Z Yang, Alaattin Erkanli, Jennifer Byrns
Objectives: Tacrolimus remains the mainstay of immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Understanding the relationship between therapeutic tacrolimus levels and outcomes of acute rejection, patient/graft survival, and tolerability are important. The relationship between time to therapeutic tacrolimus levels and outcomes has not been well established, specifically with the use of extended release tacrolimus formulation (LCP-Tac). This study investigated time to therapeutic tacrolimus levels of 2 tacrolimus formulations, LCP-Tac and immediate release tacrolimus (IR-Tac), as a predictor of clinical outcomes. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of kidney transplant recipients at Duke Hospital between 2013-2021. The primary objective evaluated the difference in time to therapeutic tacrolimus levels with LCP-Tac vs IR-Tac regimens. Secondary endpoints included time within therapeutic range during the first 3 months post-transplant, incidence of biopsy-proven rejection, development of de novo donor specific antibodies, and patient and allograft survival at 12 months post-transplant. Results: 128 patients were included (63 in LCP-Tac group and 65 in IR-Tac group). The time to therapeutic tacrolimus level was similar between formulations (7.2 days with LCP-Tac compared to 6.7 days with IR-Tac, P = .63). The time within therapeutic range during the first 3 months post-transplant, via modified Rosendaal, was similar with LCP-Tac and IR-Tac (56.1% vs 64.8%, respectively). Rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months were similar (7/63 (11.1%) compared to 4/65 (6.2%)). There was no difference in patient/graft survival between groups. Conclusions: The time to therapeutic tacrolimus levels did not differ based on tacrolimus formulation and was not correlated with clinical outcomes.
{"title":"Evaluation of Tacrolimus Concentrations and Clinical Outcomes Between Extended and Immediate Release Formulations in Kidney Transplant.","authors":"Hannah Naguib, Goni Katz-Greenberg, Matt Harris, Jennifer Gommer, Lexie Z Yang, Alaattin Erkanli, Jennifer Byrns","doi":"10.1177/08971900241248862","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08971900241248862","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Tacrolimus remains the mainstay of immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Understanding the relationship between therapeutic tacrolimus levels and outcomes of acute rejection, patient/graft survival, and tolerability are important. The relationship between time to therapeutic tacrolimus levels and outcomes has not been well established, specifically with the use of extended release tacrolimus formulation (LCP-Tac). This study investigated time to therapeutic tacrolimus levels of 2 tacrolimus formulations, LCP-Tac and immediate release tacrolimus (IR-Tac), as a predictor of clinical outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of kidney transplant recipients at Duke Hospital between 2013-2021. The primary objective evaluated the difference in time to therapeutic tacrolimus levels with LCP-Tac vs IR-Tac regimens. Secondary endpoints included time within therapeutic range during the first 3 months post-transplant, incidence of biopsy-proven rejection, development of de novo donor specific antibodies, and patient and allograft survival at 12 months post-transplant. <b>Results:</b> 128 patients were included (63 in LCP-Tac group and 65 in IR-Tac group). The time to therapeutic tacrolimus level was similar between formulations (7.2 days with LCP-Tac compared to 6.7 days with IR-Tac, <i>P</i> = .63). The time within therapeutic range during the first 3 months post-transplant, via modified Rosendaal, was similar with LCP-Tac and IR-Tac (56.1% vs 64.8%, respectively). Rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months were similar (7/63 (11.1%) compared to 4/65 (6.2%)). There was no difference in patient/graft survival between groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> The time to therapeutic tacrolimus levels did not differ based on tacrolimus formulation and was not correlated with clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"1283-1290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140855700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-05-13DOI: 10.1177/08971900241248883
Shelbye R Herbin, Hannah Crum, Krista Gens
Clostridioides difficile is a toxin-producing bacteria that is a main cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) are associated with disruptions within the gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota which can be further exacerbated by CDI-targeted antibiotic treatment thereby causing recurrent CDI (rCDI) and compounding the burden placed on patients and the healthcare system. Treatment of rCDI consists of antibiotics which can be paired with preventative therapeutics, such as bezlotoxumab or fecal microbiota transplants (FMTs), if sustained clinical response is not obtained. Newer preventative strategies have been recently approved to assist in restoring balance within the GI system with the goal of preventing recurrent infections.
{"title":"Breaking the Cycle of Recurrent <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infections: A Narrative Review Exploring Current and Novel Therapeutic Strategies.","authors":"Shelbye R Herbin, Hannah Crum, Krista Gens","doi":"10.1177/08971900241248883","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08971900241248883","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Clostridioides difficile</i> is a toxin-producing bacteria that is a main cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infections (CDI) are associated with disruptions within the gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota which can be further exacerbated by CDI-targeted antibiotic treatment thereby causing recurrent CDI (rCDI) and compounding the burden placed on patients and the healthcare system. Treatment of rCDI consists of antibiotics which can be paired with preventative therapeutics, such as bezlotoxumab or fecal microbiota transplants (FMTs), if sustained clinical response is not obtained. Newer preventative strategies have been recently approved to assist in restoring balance within the GI system with the goal of preventing recurrent infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"1361-1373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140916311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-21DOI: 10.1177/08971900241302388
Jessica C Brumit, Ryan A Caputo, Sheila M Chucta, Rachel M Smith, Samantha Warren, Kevin T Kissling
Background: Thrombocytopenia is due to multifactorial causes in critically ill patients. One etiology is continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT); however, it is unknown if different modalities impact the incidence. Objectives: To compare the incidence of thrombocytopenia with the NxStage CRRT system using continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) compared to the Prismaflex system using continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study at a large academic medical center in the United States. Individuals aged 18 or older admitted to the cardiovascular ICU between June 1, 2016 and September 30, 2022, and received CRRT for at least 48 hours were identified. Results: One hundred and forty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Sixty-one patients received CVVHD with the NxStage system, while 86 received CVVHDF with the Prismaflex system. Thrombocytopenia occurred in 57.4% of patients treated with NxStage vs 19.8% treated with Prismaflex (OR 5.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.62-11.39). These results were consistent in an adjusted model (OR 5.57; 95% CI, 2.34-13.28). There was no difference in the time to thrombocytopenia between groups. Patients treated with the NxStage system had lower platelet nadirs, more heparin-induced thrombocytopenia testing, more direct thrombin inhibitor use, and more blood transfusions. Conclusions: A greater incidence of thrombocytopenia occurred in cardiovascular ICU patients treated with CVVHD using the NxStage system vs CVVHDF with the Prismaflex system.
{"title":"Incidence of Thrombocytopenia With Different Continuous Renal Replacement Systems and Modalities in a Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Jessica C Brumit, Ryan A Caputo, Sheila M Chucta, Rachel M Smith, Samantha Warren, Kevin T Kissling","doi":"10.1177/08971900241302388","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241302388","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Thrombocytopenia is due to multifactorial causes in critically ill patients. One etiology is continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT); however, it is unknown if different modalities impact the incidence. <b>Objectives:</b> To compare the incidence of thrombocytopenia with the NxStage CRRT system using continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) compared to the Prismaflex system using continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective cohort study at a large academic medical center in the United States. Individuals aged 18 or older admitted to the cardiovascular ICU between June 1, 2016 and September 30, 2022, and received CRRT for at least 48 hours were identified. <b>Results:</b> One hundred and forty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Sixty-one patients received CVVHD with the NxStage system, while 86 received CVVHDF with the Prismaflex system. Thrombocytopenia occurred in 57.4% of patients treated with NxStage vs 19.8% treated with Prismaflex (OR 5.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.62-11.39). These results were consistent in an adjusted model (OR 5.57; 95% CI, 2.34-13.28). There was no difference in the time to thrombocytopenia between groups. Patients treated with the NxStage system had lower platelet nadirs, more heparin-induced thrombocytopenia testing, more direct thrombin inhibitor use, and more blood transfusions. <b>Conclusions:</b> A greater incidence of thrombocytopenia occurred in cardiovascular ICU patients treated with CVVHD using the NxStage system vs CVVHDF with the Prismaflex system.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"8971900241302388"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142682159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-20DOI: 10.1177/08971900241302881
Zane Elfessi, Elizabeth Portnoy, Harry Karydes, Sarah Zavala
Necrotizing fasciitis is a serious infection that requires prompt surgical excision and broad spectrum antibiotics. Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a type of necrotizing fasciitis that specifically affects the perineal, scrotal, and genital region. FG is a known adverse outcome of the class of medications known as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. This class of drugs is most commonly use to treat diabetes, but recently it's use has expanded to include those with heart failure, regardless of whether they have diabetes. With the increased use of SGLT2 inhibitors, the incidence of FG may increase as well. We present 2 case reports of patients who experienced FG while on SGLT2 inhibitor therapy.
{"title":"Fournier's Gangrene and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Use: A Report of Two Cases.","authors":"Zane Elfessi, Elizabeth Portnoy, Harry Karydes, Sarah Zavala","doi":"10.1177/08971900241302881","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241302881","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Necrotizing fasciitis is a serious infection that requires prompt surgical excision and broad spectrum antibiotics. Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a type of necrotizing fasciitis that specifically affects the perineal, scrotal, and genital region. FG is a known adverse outcome of the class of medications known as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. This class of drugs is most commonly use to treat diabetes, but recently it's use has expanded to include those with heart failure, regardless of whether they have diabetes. With the increased use of SGLT2 inhibitors, the incidence of FG may increase as well. We present 2 case reports of patients who experienced FG while on SGLT2 inhibitor therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"8971900241302881"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142682157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}