Journal of Psychiatric Practice最新文献

Objective: The two-injection start (TIS) initiation regimen was recently approved for aripiprazole once monthly 400 mg (AOM400), with potential benefits in adherence. The SaTISfy study described in this article analyzed Spanish psychiatrists' perspectives on hospitalization lengths of stay, schizophrenia management, and the use of AOM400-TIS.

Methods: The authors describe an ecological study of aggregated data collected using a 41-question survey. Fifty psychiatrists were asked to provide their perceptions of their patients with schizophrenia and treatment with AOM400.

Results: The psychiatrists reported that lack of treatment adherence was the main reason for hospitalization for 58.3% of their patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. Aripiprazole, in any formulation, was the most commonly prescribed therapeutic option, being prescribed for a mean (SD) of 2.5 (0.9) out of 5 patients, while 98% of psychiatrists chose AOM400-TIS for patients who failed to adhere to previous treatments. Patients with schizophrenia, regardless of their treatment, were hospitalized for an average of 17.7 (3.93) days versus patients with schizophrenia treated with AOM400-TIS, who were hospitalized for an average of 14.2 (4.18) days, a reduction of 3.5 (3.86) days. Patients treated with AOM400-TIS showed a reduction of 5 (4.18) days compared with the mean national duration of hospitalization for acute patients in psychiatry units in Spain (19.18 d). The surveyed psychiatrists reported that AOM400-TIS improved safety and tolerability. Most of the psychiatrists were satisfied with the administration and results of AOM400-TIS. Most of the psychiatrists (90%) also reported that fewer health care resources were consumed with AOM400-TIS, mainly due to a reduction in hospitalization days and in the use of concomitant medications.

Conclusions: AOM400-TIS was considered to have a positive impact on the duration of hospitalization and thus on the use of health care resources. There was a positive perception of adherence, safety, and tolerability with the use of AOM400-TIS in patients with schizophrenia.

Approaching mental health issues in the Vietnamese community is challenging due to the distinct cultural practices, the stigma of mental illness, and the language barrier. These complexities are compounded by additional stressors experienced by many Vietnamese Americans stemming from war trauma and the demands of immigration. In this article, the authors discuss the implications that Vietnamese cultural practices have on the perception of mental health in Vietnamese American communities. Specifically, the discussion encompasses mood disorders, particularly depression, and schizophrenia, 2 prevalent mental health conditions that often intersect with cultural nuances. Shedding light on this often-overlooked aspect, the authors provide insight into understanding the specific challenges Vietnamese Americans with depression and schizophrenia face. At the end of this article, a helpful table of commonly used mental health terms, their Vietnamese translations, and explanations in Vietnamese are presented. Beyond linguistics, the article extends its guidance to mental health providers seeking to engage in productive discussion about mental health with their patients. By offering practical tips tailored to cultural context, the article aims to foster a more inclusive approach to mental health in Vietnamese American communities.

In lethal means safety counseling (LMSC), clinicians encourage patients to limit their access to common and lethal means of suicide, especially firearms. However, previous studies have shown that clinicians may hesitate to deliver this evidence-based intervention, in part because of concerns that patients might not find such discussions acceptable. Based on a published review of 18 qualitative studies examining diverse perspectives on LMSC, we discuss strategies that may help clinicians increase the acceptability of LMSC among their patients and present supporting scripts, rationales, and resources. The studies included in the review examined the perspectives of clinicians, patients, firearm owners, and other relevant groups across a wide range of clinical settings on LMSC for firearms. The authors of these studies recommend that clinicians approach LMSC in a nonjudgmental manner with awareness of their own biases, demonstrate cultural competency by acknowledging the role of firearms in patients' lives, and adapt LMSC to patients' previous experiences with firearms, safety, and injury. Clinicians may also want to contextualize and provide a rationale for LMSC, decide whether or not to directly ask about access to firearms, and recommend a range of storage options tailored to the patient. Free locking devices or discount coupons for purchasing such devices may increase the acceptability and efficacy of these discussions. The strategies recommended in this paper are the first to be based on a comprehensive set of relevant studies. Future research is needed to examine whether these strategies do in fact increase the acceptability of LMSC and promote other outcomes such as increased feasibility and efficacy.

Objective: In 2021, 89.3 million refugees were vulnerable to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after exposure to multiple and repeated traumatic experiences. The recent war in Ukraine provoked 7 million refugees to flee their homes. Specific clinical presentations of PTSD in refugee populations may not be familiar to most physicians. The goal of this review is to describe the diagnosis and specific clinical features of PTSD in refugees.

Methods: This narrative review of 263 articles explores 3 PTSD diagnoses that are frequently described in refugee populations and that have been observed in our clinical practices: complex PTSD, PTSD with psychotic symptoms, and PTSD with somatic symptoms.

Results: While complex PTSD does not seem to be related to individuals' culture and origin, the other 2 diagnoses have been specifically described in refugee populations. PTSD with somatic manifestations appears to be the most frequently described and commonly acknowledged form in refugee populations, whereas PTSD with psychotic symptoms remains more controversial due to its clinical variability and association with comorbid disorders.

Conclusions: The difficulty of identifying PTSD with psychotic symptoms and PTSD with somatic symptoms in refugee populations may lead to misdiagnosis and explain the moderate effectiveness of care delivered to these populations. Appropriate diagnosis is essential to provide optimal psychiatric care to refugee populations.

This column focuses on the status of intravenous racemic ketamine for the treatment of patients suffering from a form of major depressive disorder that does not respond to trials of currently available biogenic amine antidepressants. To provide context, the column reviews the 3 pivotal elements of the usual Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug approval process: (1) the unmet medical need (ie, the indication) for which the drug is being developed, (2) the efficacy of the drug for that condition, and (3) the safety/tolerability of the drug. This column is based on the author's 45-year history of drug development work and is not a statement of the FDA. There are typically 3 phases in the drug development process: (1) studies done in normal volunteers, (2) typically small-scale proof of concept studies, and (3) large-scale registration trials. This third phase is critical in determining the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the drug in a manner that most closely follows the clinical use of the drug. This column focuses specifically on whether generally small-scale studies done in academic centers are sufficient for drug approval, and it briefly reviews lithium and clozapine as examples of psychiatric medications that had such academic research in the literature, as well as clinical use in other countries. Those data supported the unique value of these medications in patients with bipolar disorder and treatment-resistant schizophrenia (ie, the unmet medical need), respectively, and the findings led American psychiatrists to advocate for FDA approval of these medications. Their efforts led to the needed registration trials for FDA approval of these medications. This column reviews the key features of registration trials and the reason that they are critical for FDA approval, and it discusses 2 special considerations related to the intravenous administration of racemic ketamine. First, racemic ketamine is not esketamine but, instead, it contains R-ketamine in addition to S-ketamine (ie, esketamine). The second consideration is that differences between intravenous and intranasal administration may affect the safety of the drug. While safety concerns were specifically addressed in the registration trials for esketamine, comparable research remains to be done for intravenous racemic ketamine. Understanding how the FDA's drug approval process works is important for prescribers, their patients, and the public.

For more than 2 decades, intravenous ketamine has been demonstrated to have rapid antidepressant effects. However, access to this generic drug is limited due to insurers claiming it is "experimental" because ketamine does not have a Food and Drug Administration indication for depression. In contrast, intranasal esketamine, an enantiomer of ketamine, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for depression and is still under patent. The goal of this column is to provide a clearer understanding of formulary coverage of these similar medications by insurers. Formularies of all 2023 Ohio Health Insurance Marketplace and Medicaid plans were reviewed to determine the inclusion status of intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine for depression. This review found that intravenous ketamine was not covered by any Marketplace or Medicaid plan for depression, while intranasal esketamine was on 72.7% and 100% of formularies, respectively. Thus, members of the analyzed insurance plans can more easily access intranasal esketamine than intravenous ketamine for depression, despite the latter being more cost-effective and possibly more efficacious.

Research on the prodromal phase of schizophrenia has been ongoing for several decades and, more recently, findings from this research are being incorporated into everyday psychiatric practice, such as the use of interviews to evaluate prodromal symptomatology. This evolution is happening in the midst of an explosion of social media use by teenagers and young adults, increasing the exposure of youth to portrayals of psychiatric experiences. For example, reports from around the world of "TIK-TOK tics" emphasize the role of social media in the "creation" of psychiatric symptoms. This case report highlights the importance of a full psychiatric evaluation in acute care settings where quick treatment of psychotic symptoms is the norm. A 15-year-old patient was initially diagnosed with prodromal schizophrenia but, after a more extensive evaluation during a second admission, she was diagnosed with borderline personality disorder. Her antipsychotic treatment regimen was stopped and appropriate education and treatment were started, without the recurrence of "psychotic symptoms" during follow-up. It may be that patients with borderline personality disorder, a frequent condition on inpatient units, are at particular risk of assimilating symptoms as represented on social media.

Psychiatric medications can serve as important tools for addressing behavioral health issues among criminal justice-involved (CJI) veterans. This study used national data on 12,790 CJI veterans in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veterans Justice Outreach program from 2019 to 2020 to compare patterns of psychiatric medication prescriptions among veterans who entered a veterans treatment court (n = 6975), another specialty court (SC; n = 414), or no-SC (n = 5401). Different classes of medications were examined, including antidepressants, stimulants, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and medications for substance use disorders. The results showed that 60.2% of the total sample was prescribed a psychiatric medication within 1 year of entering the Veterans Justice Outreach program. There was no significant difference in overall psychiatric prescribing among veterans treatment court, other SC, and no-SC groups, but there were a few differences in certain classes of psychiatric medications. Moreover, about 7.8% of veterans who were in the no-SC group and were prescribed psychiatric medications did not have a psychiatric diagnosis. Veterans who were younger, non-Hispanic white, married, with a VA service-connected disability rating, had a diagnosis of mental and/or substance use disorder, and used more VA health care services were more likely to have been prescribed psychiatric medication. Together, these findings illustrate the essential role of psychiatric medications in courts and programs that serve CJI veterans, as well as the important link between VA service engagement and psychiatric prescriptions.