Journal of reconstructive microsurgery最新文献

Background:  The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. However, the conventional procedure's anterior sheath division, from perforating vessels to the pedicle origin, risks weakening the abdominal wall's primary strength layer. Employing the da Vinci Xi Surgical System with indocyanine green dye and near-infrared fluorescence imaging, we refined a robotic technique for bilateral DIEP flap harvest. This approach enhances safety during vessel dissection, utilizing smaller fascial incisions. This study will present this technique in detail to microsurgeons interested in robotic DIEP flaps.

Methods:  In a retrospective cohort study spanning July 2021 to September 2022, female patients undergoing robotic bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction were analyzed. Following suprafascial flap dissection, the surgical robot was docked to target the pelvis, identifying and exposing deep inferior epigastric vessels intracorporeally. Mobilization and division occurred at their bases, with retrieval through a minimal anterior fascial incision, minimizing disruption to the abdominal wall and its motor innervation.

Results:  The study comprised 23 patients (46 flaps), with a mean fascial length of 4.1 cm and mean pedicle length of 12.82 cm. Mesh usage was absent. Robotic time averaged 139 minutes, overall case length was 739 minutes, and the average length of stay was 3.9 days. Notably, no pedicle or intra-abdominal injuries were reported.

Conclusion:  This technique ensures safe and efficient pedicle dissection in robotic DIEP flap harvests. Given the limited number of plastic surgeons adept in minimally invasive abdominal surgeries, we recommend collaborative efforts, with general surgeons initially assisting microsurgeons in adopting the robotic approach. This strategy facilitates a smooth transition until plastic surgeons attain confidence and competence in independent robotic dissection.

The integration of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has transformed various surgical disciplines, including more recently plastic surgery. While RAS has gained acceptance in multiple specialties, its integration in plastic surgery has been gradual, challenging traditional open methods. Robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is a technique aimed to overcome drawbacks associated with the traditional open DIEP flap approach. These limitations include a relatively large fascial incision length, potentially increasing rates of postoperative pain, abdominal bulge, hernia rates, and core weakening. The robotic-assisted DIEP flap technique emerges as an innovative and advantageous approach in fascial-sparing abdominal based autologous breast reconstruction. While acknowledging certain challenges such as increased operative time, ongoing refinements are expected to further improve the overall surgical experience, optimize results, and solidify the role of robotics in advancing reconstructive microsurgical procedures in plastic surgery. Herein, the authors provide an overview of robotic surgery in the context of plastic surgery and its role in the DIEP flap harvest for breast reconstruction.

Background: Numerous surgical fields have embraced computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM), including plastic and reconstructive surgery. However, most of the literature and clinical use pertains to reconstruction of the head and neck. Herein we provide a case series and systematic review of the literature, documenting the use of CAD/CAM in facilitating complex microvascular free tissue transfer for reconstructions involving the extremities, pelvis, and spine (EPS).

Methods: This study consisted of two components: a case series and a systematic review of the literature. For the case series, the senior author's cases that included CAD/CAM to assist microvascular free tissue transfer reconstructions of the EPS were included. For the systematic review, all PubMed, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar-indexed studies describing the use of CAD/CAM to facilitate free tissue transfer in the EPS were identified and included using PRSMA-guidelines.

Results: The case series identified ten patients who received CAD/CAM assisted microvascular reconstruction. Our systematic review identified 15 articles, representing 124 patients and 133 CAD/CAM assisted free tissue transfers. Most authors believed that CAD/CAM facilitated a more efficient operation by shifting much of the intraoperative planning to the preoperative phase, ultimately translating to a shorter and more accurate surgery with improved function and cosmesis.

Conclusions: CAD/CAM can be used to facilitate microvascular reconstruction of the extremities, pelvis, and spine. Our cases series and systematic review suggests that CAD/CAM for EPS surgery may improve outcomes.

Background:  The use of mesh to reinforce the abdominal wall after abdominal flap harvest has been reported to decrease the risk of bulging and herniation. However, the impact of the plane of mesh placement in relation to the anterior rectus sheath (vs. no mesh) on postoperative abdominal complications remains unclear.

Methods:  We retrospectively analyzed the length of stay and clinical outcomes in 158 female patients who underwent breast reconstruction with 250 free abdominal flaps. Group 1 consisted of patients who underwent polypropylene sublay-onlay ("sandwich") mesh placement (N = 70) versus polypropylene sublay-only mesh (group 2; N = 54) versus primary fascial repair without mesh (group 3; N = 34).

Results:  Patient demographics and comorbidities were comparable between study groups, except for rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (group 1: 53% vs. group 2: 33% vs. group 3: 24% [p < 0.01]), postoperative follow-up in months (group 1: 21.5; group 2: 11.5; group 3: 7.6 [p < 0.01]), and length of stay in days (group 1: 4.9 vs. group 2: 4.4 vs. group 3: 3.3 [p < 0.01]). No differences were observed in breast flap and donor-site complications between study groups. Patients in group 3 required significantly lower oral morphine equivalent units postoperatively compared with those in groups 1 and 2 (group 1:185.5 vs. group 2: 79.7 vs. group 3: 71.6 [p < 0.01]).

Conclusion:  Abdominal donor-site closure without mesh was associated with a shorter length of stay and less narcotic intake without an increase in donor-site complications. These findings should be considered when deciding to place mesh for donor-site closure after abdominal flap harvest.

Background: In the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries with nerve defects, second-generation collagen-based conduits, such as Renerve® (Nipro, Osaka, Japan), have shown the potential for promoting nerve regeneration. However, there is concern related to the weak material properties. No previous studies have addressed the strength of the bridging model using collagen conduits. This study aimed to investigate the tensile strength and failure patterns in nerve defect models bridged with Renerve® conduits through biomechanical research.

Methods: Using fresh chicken sciatic nerves, we examined the maximum failure load of four groups: bridging models using Renerve® with one suture (group A), with two sutures (group B), with three sutures (group C), and end-to-end neurorrhaphy models with two sutures (group N). Each group had eight specimens. We also evaluated failure patterns of the specimens.

Results: Group N showed a significantly higher maximum failure load (0.96 ± 0.13 N) than groups A (0.23 ± 0.06 N, p < 0.0001), B (0.29 ± 0.05 N, p < 0.0001), and C (0.40 ± 0.10 N, p < 0.0001). Regarding failure patterns, all specimens in group A showed nerve end dislocation from the conduit. Two specimens in group B and three specimens in group C failed due to circumferential cracks in the conduit. Six specimens in group B and five specimens in group C exhibited cutting out of sutures from the conduit.

Conclusion: This study suggests that the number of sutures in synthetic collagen nerve conduits has little effect on the maximum failure load. To take advantage of its biomaterial benefits, a period of postoperative range of motion restriction may be required.

Background: The rising clinical importance of assessing frailty is driven by its predictive capability for postoperative outcomes. This study assesses RAI-rev (Risk Analysis Index) effectiveness in predicting adverse outcomes in lower extremity (LE) flap reconstruction.

Methods: Analyzing NSQIP data from 2015-2020, we compared demographics, perioperative factors, and 30-day outcomes in all locoregional and free flap cases. Frailty scores, calculated using RAI-rev, were categorized with <15 as non-frail and >35 as the most frail. Adjusted odds-ratios (aOR) for specific complications were calculated using non-frail as the reference group. Frailty scores in locoregional flaps were compared to those in free flaps.

Results: We identified 270 locoregional and 107 free flap cases. Higher RAI-rev scores in locoregional flaps correlated with increased complications, such as deep surgical site infection (1% non-frail vs. 20% RAI 31-35), stroke (0% non-frail vs. 17% most-frail), and mortality (0% non-frail vs. 17% most-frail). Locoregional flap cases with RAI-rev scores in the most-frail group had a significantly elevated aOR for stroke (51.0, 95% CI: 1.8-1402.5, p=0.02), mortality (43.1, 95% CI: 1.6-1167.6, p=0.03), and any complication (6.8, 95% CI: 1.2-37.4, p=0.03). In free flap cases, higher RAI-rev scores were associated with increased complications, with only sepsis showing a statistically significant difference (6% non-frail vs. 100% most-frail; aOR 42.3, CI: 1.45 - 1245.3, p=0.03). Free flap cases had a significantly lower RAI-rev score compared to locoregional flap cases (14.91 vs. 17.64, p=0.01).

Conclusion: Elevated RAI-rev scores (>35) correlated with more complications in locoregional flaps, while free flap reconstruction patients had generally low RAI-rev scores. This suggests that free flaps are less commonly recommended for presumed higher-risk patients. The study demonstrates that RAI-rev may be able to serve as a risk calculator in lower extremity reconstruction, aiding in the assessment of candidates for limb salvage versus amputation.

Background:  Mastectomy, axillary lymph node dissection, and irradiation for breast cancer commonly result in perivascular and axillary scarring. This scarring is thought to cause functional venous stenosis that leads to downstream venous hypertension in the affected extremity. Standard surgical practice is to decompress perivascular scarring at the time of physiologic lymphedema surgery in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). However, it is unknown whether this scar release influences surgical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of functional venous stenosis in patients with BCRL and determine whether scar decompression is a necessary step in physiologic lymphedema surgery.

Methods:  The authors conducted a retrospective review of 64 patients with unilateral BCRL that presented to our lymphedema center between January 2020 and October 2022. Radiologist reports of venous duplex ultrasound for the bilateral upper extremities identified any disturbances in venous flow or indications of venous stenosis.

Results:  Of the 64 patients with BCRL, 78% (n = 50) had prior axillary lymph node dissection. Forty-seven (73%) patients completed ultrasound imaging, of which, one patient (2%) had venous stenosis in the affected lymphedematous extremity identified on duplex ultrasound that may have suggested functional scarring. Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) without scar decompression was performed in six patients (9%). Average preoperative Lymphedema Life Impact Scale and Lymphedema Index scores were 35 and 19 units, with a mean decrease of 23 (67%) and 6 (30%) units postoperatively.

Conclusion:  Most patients with BCRL did not have identifiable functional venous stenosis on duplex ultrasound, apart from one patient with suspected postthrombotic changes. All six patients that received VLNT without scar decompression had a successful outcome with decreased measures of lymphedema postoperatively. Scar decompression may therefore be unnecessary in physiologic lymphedema surgery, reducing operative times and avoiding risk of injury to neurovascular structures of the axilla.

Background:  Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) involves transplanting a functional and anatomically complete tissue graft, such as a hand or face, from a deceased donor to a recipient. Although clinical VCA has resulted in successful outcomes, high rates of acute rejection and increased requirements for immunosuppression have led to significant long-term complications. Of note, immunosuppressed graft recipients are predisposed to infections, organ dysfunction, and malignancies. The long-term success of VCA grafts requires the discovery and implementation of unique approaches that avoid these complications altogether. Here, we describe our surgical technique and initial experience with a reproducible heterotopic porcine VCA model for the preclinical assessment of approaches to improve graft outcomes.

Methods:  Six heterotopic porcine allogeneic vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap transplants were performed using Sinclair donors and Yucatan recipients. Immunosuppressive therapy was not used. Each flap was based on the left external iliac vessel system. Animals were followed postoperatively for surgery-related complications.

Results:  The six pigs underwent successful VCA and were euthanized at the end of the study. Each flap demonstrated complete survival following vessel anastomosis. For the allogeneic recipients, on average, minimal erythema and healthy flap color were observed from postoperative days 1 to 4. There were no surgery-related animal deaths or complications.

Conclusion:  We have developed a reproducible, technically feasible heterotopic porcine VCA model based on the left external iliac vessel system. Our results demonstrate this model's potential to improve VCA graft outcomes by exploring tolerance induction and rejection biomarker discovery in preclinical studies.

Background:  Traditional deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap harvest splits the anterior sheath, weakening the abdominal wall and predisposing patients to bulge or hernia. Abdominal wall morbidity may be decreased using minimally invasive techniques. We refined a transabdominal approach to the robotic harvest of bilateral DIEP flaps.

Methods:  A retrospective medical record study involving all patients who underwent bilateral or bipedicled robotic DIEP (rDIEP) or standard DIEP (sDIEP) flap harvest between July 2021 and September 2022. Outcomes included abdominal wall morbidity, total operative time, length of stay (LOS), and complications.

Results:  Forty-seven patients were included (48 sDIEP flaps, 46 rDIEP flaps) with no significant difference in patient characteristics. Fascial incision length in the rDIEP group was shorter (4.1 vs. 11.7 cm, p < 0.001). Mesh reinforcement of the abdominal wall was used in 13/24 sDIEP and none in rDIEP patients (p < 0.001). Operative time was longer in the rDIEP cohort (739 vs. 630 minutes, p = 0.013), although subanalysis showed no difference in the second half of the cohort. The average robotic dissection time was 135 minutes, which decreased significantly with the surgeon's experience. There were no intraoperative complications from using the robot. LOS was shorter with rDIEP but not statistically significant (3.9 vs. 4.3 days, p = 0.157).

Conclusion:  This study represents the most extensive cohort analysis of bilateral rDIEP flap harvest, offering a comprehensive comparison to traditional sDIEP. The initial results underscore the viability of robotic techniques for flap harvesting, highlighting potential advantages including reduced fascial incision length and decreased abdominal disruption. Furthermore, using robotics may obviate the necessity for fascial reinforcement with mesh.

Background:  The Flapbot chatbot assists in free-flap monitoring, emphasizing accessibility, user-friendliness, and global reliability. This study assesses Flapbot's worldwide validity and usability and uses qualitative analysis to identify areas for future enhancement.

Methods:  Flapbot, built on Google's DialogFlow, was evaluated by international plastic surgeons. Invitations were sent to the International Lower Limb Reconstruction Collaborative (INTELLECT), International Confederation of Plastic Surgery Societies (ICOPLAST), and the International Microsurgery Club. Out of the 42 surgeons who agreed to participate, 21 tested the Flapbot and completed an online survey on its validity and usability. The survey had 13 validity items and 10 usability items. Data analysis involved computing the individual content validity index (I-CVI) and scale-wide content validity index (S-CVI) for validity, and the system usability score (SUS) for usability. Thematic analysis distilled free-text responses to identify key themes.

Results:  Nine of 13 items had an I-CVI over 0.78, denoting significant relevance. The S-CVI score stood at 0.82, indicating high relevance. The SUS score was 68, representing average usability. Themes highlighted issues with the current model, development suggestions, and surgeons' concerns regarding growing reliance on digital tools in health care.

Conclusion:  Flapbot is a promising digital aid for free-flap monitoring. While it showcases notable validity and usability, improvements in functionality, usability, and accessibility are needed for broader global use.