Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.3928/1081597x-20240717-01
Solin Saleh,Liam J Epp,Elaine My Tien Tran,Edward E Manche
PURPOSETo report 12-month visual and refractive outcomes following topography-guided femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia and compound myopic astigmatism correction.METHODSThis prospective, single-center observational study was conducted in an outpatient clinical practice at the Stanford University Byers Eye Institute in Palo Alto, California. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, 5% and 25% contrast sensitivity CDVA, and manifest refraction following topography-guided femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK were assessed. Refractive measurements were used to perform a vector analysis.RESULTSSixty eyes of 30 patients (mean age: 32.8 ± 7.0 years; range: 23 to 52 years) undergoing topography-guided LASIK for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism were analyzed. Mean postoperative UDVA was -0.09 ± 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at 12 months. Mean preoperative CDVA was -0.09 ± 0.09 and -0.13 ± 0.08 logMAR at postoperative 12 months. At 12 months, 26.9% of eyes had gained one or more lines of postoperative UDVA compared to baseline CDVA. Mean pre-operative 5% contrast sensitivity CDVA was 0.68 ± 0.07 and 0.64 ± 0.12 logMAR at 12 months (P = .014) following LASIK.CONCLUSIONSTopography-guided LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction provided excellent visual and refractive outcomes that were predictable, precise, and stable up to 12 months postoperatively. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e595-e603.].
{"title":"12-Month Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Topography-guided Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.","authors":"Solin Saleh,Liam J Epp,Elaine My Tien Tran,Edward E Manche","doi":"10.3928/1081597x-20240717-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20240717-01","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSETo report 12-month visual and refractive outcomes following topography-guided femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia and compound myopic astigmatism correction.METHODSThis prospective, single-center observational study was conducted in an outpatient clinical practice at the Stanford University Byers Eye Institute in Palo Alto, California. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, 5% and 25% contrast sensitivity CDVA, and manifest refraction following topography-guided femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK were assessed. Refractive measurements were used to perform a vector analysis.RESULTSSixty eyes of 30 patients (mean age: 32.8 ± 7.0 years; range: 23 to 52 years) undergoing topography-guided LASIK for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism were analyzed. Mean postoperative UDVA was -0.09 ± 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at 12 months. Mean preoperative CDVA was -0.09 ± 0.09 and -0.13 ± 0.08 logMAR at postoperative 12 months. At 12 months, 26.9% of eyes had gained one or more lines of postoperative UDVA compared to baseline CDVA. Mean pre-operative 5% contrast sensitivity CDVA was 0.68 ± 0.07 and 0.64 ± 0.12 logMAR at 12 months (P = .014) following LASIK.CONCLUSIONSTopography-guided LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction provided excellent visual and refractive outcomes that were predictable, precise, and stable up to 12 months postoperatively. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e595-e603.].","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"e595-e603"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142225444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.3928/1081597x-20240723-04
Rose K Sia,Isabel Eaddy,Hind Beydoun,Jennifer B Eaddy,Alexis Hogan,Zachary P Skurski
PURPOSETo compare early visual quality of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in terms of low contrast acuity.METHODSA secondary analysis was performed using a harmonized dataset derived from two completed prospective cohort studies on active-duty military service members undergoing either SMILE (n = 37), wavefront-guided (WFG) LASIK (n = 51), or wavefront-optimized (WFO) LASIK (n = 56). Night vision and photopic and mesopic low contrast visual acuity (LCVA) up to 3 months postoperatively were compared between groups.RESULTSCompared to SMILE-treated eyes, WFG LASIK-treated eyes had significantly better night vision and photopic LCVA at 1 month postoperatively (beta = -0.039, P = .016; beta = -0.043, P = .007, respectively). WFO LASIK-treated eyes had significantly better photopic LCVA at 1 month postoperatively (beta = -0.039, P = .012) but had worse mesopic LCVA at 3 months postoperatively (beta = 0.033, P = .015) versus SMILE-treated eyes.CONCLUSIONSSMILE and LASIK, on either a WFG or WFO laser platform, yielded excellent outcomes, but LCVA seemed to recover quicker following LASIK compared to SMILE. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e667-e671.].
{"title":"Low Contrast Acuity Outcomes After SMILE and LASIK.","authors":"Rose K Sia,Isabel Eaddy,Hind Beydoun,Jennifer B Eaddy,Alexis Hogan,Zachary P Skurski","doi":"10.3928/1081597x-20240723-04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20240723-04","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSETo compare early visual quality of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in terms of low contrast acuity.METHODSA secondary analysis was performed using a harmonized dataset derived from two completed prospective cohort studies on active-duty military service members undergoing either SMILE (n = 37), wavefront-guided (WFG) LASIK (n = 51), or wavefront-optimized (WFO) LASIK (n = 56). Night vision and photopic and mesopic low contrast visual acuity (LCVA) up to 3 months postoperatively were compared between groups.RESULTSCompared to SMILE-treated eyes, WFG LASIK-treated eyes had significantly better night vision and photopic LCVA at 1 month postoperatively (beta = -0.039, P = .016; beta = -0.043, P = .007, respectively). WFO LASIK-treated eyes had significantly better photopic LCVA at 1 month postoperatively (beta = -0.039, P = .012) but had worse mesopic LCVA at 3 months postoperatively (beta = 0.033, P = .015) versus SMILE-treated eyes.CONCLUSIONSSMILE and LASIK, on either a WFG or WFO laser platform, yielded excellent outcomes, but LCVA seemed to recover quicker following LASIK compared to SMILE. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e667-e671.].","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"30 1","pages":"e667-e671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142225440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
PURPOSETo investigate the impact of back-to-front corneal radius ratio (B/F ratio) and posterior keratometry (PK) on the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in eyes after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)/photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery.METHODSA retrospective, consecutive case series study included 101 patients (132 eyes) with cataract after myopic LASIK/PRK. Mean prediction error (PE), mean absolute PE (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), and the percentage of eyes within ±0.25, ±0.50, and ±1.00 diopters (D) of PE were determined.RESULTSThe Barrett True K-TK formula exhibited the lowest MAE (0.59 D) and MedAE (0.48 D) and the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.50 D of PE (54.55%) in total. In eyes with a B/F ratio of 0.70 or less and PK of -5.70 D or greater, the Potvin-Hill formula displayed the lowest MAE (0.46 to 0.67 D).CONCLUSIONSThe Barrett True-TK exhibited the highest prediction accuracy in eyes after myopic LASIK/PRK overall. However, for eyes with a low B/F ratio and flat PK, the Potvin-Hill performed best. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e635-e644.].
{"title":"Effect of Posterior Keratometry and Corneal Radius Ratio on the Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Formulas After Myopic LASIK/PRK.","authors":"Yuxing Zheng,Jiaqing Zhang,Xiaotong Han,Ruoxuan Huang,Ling Wen,Jinfeng Ye,Yiguo Huang,Xiaozhang Qiu,Xiaoyun Chen,Xuhua Tan,Lixia Luo","doi":"10.3928/1081597x-20240718-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20240718-01","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSETo investigate the impact of back-to-front corneal radius ratio (B/F ratio) and posterior keratometry (PK) on the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in eyes after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)/photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery.METHODSA retrospective, consecutive case series study included 101 patients (132 eyes) with cataract after myopic LASIK/PRK. Mean prediction error (PE), mean absolute PE (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), and the percentage of eyes within ±0.25, ±0.50, and ±1.00 diopters (D) of PE were determined.RESULTSThe Barrett True K-TK formula exhibited the lowest MAE (0.59 D) and MedAE (0.48 D) and the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.50 D of PE (54.55%) in total. In eyes with a B/F ratio of 0.70 or less and PK of -5.70 D or greater, the Potvin-Hill formula displayed the lowest MAE (0.46 to 0.67 D).CONCLUSIONSThe Barrett True-TK exhibited the highest prediction accuracy in eyes after myopic LASIK/PRK overall. However, for eyes with a low B/F ratio and flat PK, the Potvin-Hill performed best. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e635-e644.].","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"13 2 1","pages":"e635-e644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142225441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.3928/1081597x-20240715-02
Noel Alpins
{"title":"Astigmatism: Using Correct Analysis Methods and Terminology.","authors":"Noel Alpins","doi":"10.3928/1081597x-20240715-02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20240715-02","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"11 1","pages":"e672"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142225447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.3928/1081597x-20240718-02
Dylan McBee,Karim Kozhaya,Li Wang,Mitchell P Weikert,Douglas D Koch
PURPOSETo evaluate the intrasession repeatability of wavefront aberrations obtained by a combined adaptive optics visual simulator and Hartman-Shack aberrometer in pseudophakic eyes with and without previous corneal refractive surgery.METHODSThree consecutive measurements were performed in one eye of each individual. Total ocular aberrations were recorded up to the 5th Zernike order for a 4.5-mm pupil. Repeatability was assessed by calculating the within-subject standard deviation (Sw), the repeatability limit (R), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Vector analysis was performed to assess astigmatism variability between scans.RESULTSThe study enrolled 32 normal individuals and 24 individuals with a history of refractive surgery. In normal and eyes that had previous refractive surgery, respectively, the Sw values were 0.155 and 0.176 diopters (D) for sphere and 0.184 and 0.265 D for cylinder. The Sw values for all 3rd order terms ranged from 0.037 to 0.047 µm in normal eyes and 0.044 to 0.063 µm in eyes that had previous refractive surgery. The Sw for primary spherical aberration was 0.020 µm in normal eyes and 0.026 µm in eyes that had previous refractive surgery. ICC values for measurements of astigmatism yielded larger variability (ICC = 0.751 and 0.879). However, both groups demonstrated excellent repeatability (ICC > 0.9) for root mean square higher order aberrations (RMS-HOA) and total RMS values.CONCLUSIONSIn pseudophakic eyes, the adaptive optics Hartmann-Shack device demonstrated acceptable repeatability for measurement of sphere and 3rd and 4th order HOAs with higher variability for astigmatism measurements, especially in eyes with a prior history of corneal refractive surgery. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e645-e653.].
{"title":"Repeatability of a Combined Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Hartman-Shack Aberrometer in Pseudophakic Eyes With and Without Previous Corneal Refractive Surgery.","authors":"Dylan McBee,Karim Kozhaya,Li Wang,Mitchell P Weikert,Douglas D Koch","doi":"10.3928/1081597x-20240718-02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20240718-02","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSETo evaluate the intrasession repeatability of wavefront aberrations obtained by a combined adaptive optics visual simulator and Hartman-Shack aberrometer in pseudophakic eyes with and without previous corneal refractive surgery.METHODSThree consecutive measurements were performed in one eye of each individual. Total ocular aberrations were recorded up to the 5th Zernike order for a 4.5-mm pupil. Repeatability was assessed by calculating the within-subject standard deviation (Sw), the repeatability limit (R), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Vector analysis was performed to assess astigmatism variability between scans.RESULTSThe study enrolled 32 normal individuals and 24 individuals with a history of refractive surgery. In normal and eyes that had previous refractive surgery, respectively, the Sw values were 0.155 and 0.176 diopters (D) for sphere and 0.184 and 0.265 D for cylinder. The Sw values for all 3rd order terms ranged from 0.037 to 0.047 µm in normal eyes and 0.044 to 0.063 µm in eyes that had previous refractive surgery. The Sw for primary spherical aberration was 0.020 µm in normal eyes and 0.026 µm in eyes that had previous refractive surgery. ICC values for measurements of astigmatism yielded larger variability (ICC = 0.751 and 0.879). However, both groups demonstrated excellent repeatability (ICC > 0.9) for root mean square higher order aberrations (RMS-HOA) and total RMS values.CONCLUSIONSIn pseudophakic eyes, the adaptive optics Hartmann-Shack device demonstrated acceptable repeatability for measurement of sphere and 3rd and 4th order HOAs with higher variability for astigmatism measurements, especially in eyes with a prior history of corneal refractive surgery. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e645-e653.].","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"93 1","pages":"e645-e653"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142225445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.3928/1081597x-20240723-05
Avi Wallerstein,Chelsea Ridgway,Mathieu Gauvin
{"title":"The Impact of Corneal Higher Order Aberrations on the Discrepancy Between Manifest Refractive Astigmatism and Topography-Measured Anterior Corneal Astigmatism in Healthy Candidates.","authors":"Avi Wallerstein,Chelsea Ridgway,Mathieu Gauvin","doi":"10.3928/1081597x-20240723-05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20240723-05","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"14 1","pages":"e677-e678"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142198878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
PURPOSETo determine the misclassification rate of the keratoconus percentage (KISA%) index efficacy in eyes with progressive keratoconus.METHODSThis was a retrospective case-control study of consecutive patients with confirmed progressive keratoconus and a contemporaneous normal control group with 1.00 diopters or greater regular astigmatism. Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam HR) was obtained for all patients. KISA% index and inferior-superior (IS) values were obtained from the Pentacam topometric/keratoconus staging map. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to determine the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity values.RESULTSThere were 160 eyes from 160 patients evaluated, including 80 eyes from 80 patients with progressive keratoconus and 80 eyes from 80 control patients. There were 20 eyes (25%) with progressive keratoconus misclassified by the KISA% index, with 16 eyes (20%) of the progressive keratoconus cohort classified as normal (ie, KISA% < 60). There were 4 eyes (5%) with progressive keratoconus that would classify as having "normal topography" using the published criteria for very asymmetric ectasia with normal topography of KISA% less than 60 and IS value less than 1.45. All controls had a KISA% index value of less than 15. The optimal cut-off value to distinguish cohorts was 15.31 (AUROC = 0.972, 93.75% sensitivity). KISA% index values of 60 and 100 achieved low sensitivity (80% and 73.75%, respectively).CONCLUSIONSThe KISA% index misclassified a significant proportion of eyes with progressive keratoconus as normal. Although highly specific for clinical keratoconus, the KISA% index lacks sensitivity, does not effectively discriminate between normal and abnormal topography, and thus should not be used in large data analysis or artificial intelligence-based modeling. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e614-e624.].
{"title":"Misclassification of Eyes With Progressive Keratoconus Using the KISA% Index.","authors":"Bassel Hammoud,William J Dupps,Giuliano Scarcelli,J Bradley Randleman","doi":"10.3928/1081597x-20240726-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20240726-01","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSETo determine the misclassification rate of the keratoconus percentage (KISA%) index efficacy in eyes with progressive keratoconus.METHODSThis was a retrospective case-control study of consecutive patients with confirmed progressive keratoconus and a contemporaneous normal control group with 1.00 diopters or greater regular astigmatism. Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam HR) was obtained for all patients. KISA% index and inferior-superior (IS) values were obtained from the Pentacam topometric/keratoconus staging map. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to determine the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity values.RESULTSThere were 160 eyes from 160 patients evaluated, including 80 eyes from 80 patients with progressive keratoconus and 80 eyes from 80 control patients. There were 20 eyes (25%) with progressive keratoconus misclassified by the KISA% index, with 16 eyes (20%) of the progressive keratoconus cohort classified as normal (ie, KISA% < 60). There were 4 eyes (5%) with progressive keratoconus that would classify as having \"normal topography\" using the published criteria for very asymmetric ectasia with normal topography of KISA% less than 60 and IS value less than 1.45. All controls had a KISA% index value of less than 15. The optimal cut-off value to distinguish cohorts was 15.31 (AUROC = 0.972, 93.75% sensitivity). KISA% index values of 60 and 100 achieved low sensitivity (80% and 73.75%, respectively).CONCLUSIONSThe KISA% index misclassified a significant proportion of eyes with progressive keratoconus as normal. Although highly specific for clinical keratoconus, the KISA% index lacks sensitivity, does not effectively discriminate between normal and abnormal topography, and thus should not be used in large data analysis or artificial intelligence-based modeling. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e614-e624.].","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"39 1","pages":"e614-e624"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142227699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：