From Sounds to Structures最新文献

英文中文

Copying and resolution in South Slavic and South Bantu Conjunct Agreement 南斯拉夫和南班图联合协定的复制和决议

From Sounds to Structures

Pub Date : 2018-09-10 DOI: 10.1515/9781501506734-013

A. Nevins

引用次数: 4

On the Merge position of additive and associative plurals 论加性复数和联想复数的合并位置

From Sounds to Structures

Pub Date : 2018-09-10 DOI: 10.1515/9781501506734-018

G. Cinque

Differently from the additive plural, which refers to several instances of X, the associative plural refers to a group consisting of X and other individuals associated with X.1 As noted in fn. 1, in some languages (e.g., Turkish, Ainu, Japanese) ‘additive’ plurals and ‘associative’ plurals are expressed by one and the same morpheme; in others (Bangla (Biswas 2013, 2014), Garo (Burling 2004: 179f), Hungarian (see below)), by distinct morphemes. This suggests that the two plural notions share some common component while differing with respect to other components. Some languages capitalize on the shared component thus using one and the same morpheme (lexically underspecified with respect to the two notions), while other languages capitalize on the differentiating components thus using different morphemes, according to a pervasive source of lexical variation among languages (Cinque 2015a).2 In this article just one aspect of their syntax will be in focus: their Merge position within the extended projection of the NP, where they appear to occupy two distinct positions.

与加性复数不同，加性复数指的是X的几个实例，联想复数指的是由X和与X有关的其他个体组成的一组。1、在某些语言(如土耳其语、阿伊努语、日语)中，“加性”复数和“联想”复数由同一个语素表达;在其他国家(孟加拉语(Biswas 2013, 2014)，加罗语(Burling 2004: 179f)，匈牙利语(见下文))，通过不同的语素。这表明，这两个复数概念有一些共同的组成部分，但在其他组成部分方面有所不同。根据语言之间词汇差异的普遍来源(Cinque 2015a).2，一些语言利用共享的成分，从而使用一个相同的语素(相对于两个概念，词汇上没有明确)，而其他语言利用不同的成分，从而使用不同的语素在本文中，将只关注它们语法的一个方面:它们在NP的扩展投影中的Merge位置，它们似乎占据了两个不同的位置。

引用次数: 3

Deriving morphophonological (mis)applications 衍生词音(错误)应用

From Sounds to Structures

Pub Date : 2018-09-10 DOI: 10.1515/9781501506734-007

David Embick, Kobey Shwayder

引用次数: 7

Markedness as a condition on feature sharing 标记作为特征共享的条件

From Sounds to Structures

Pub Date : 2018-09-10 DOI: 10.1515/9781501506734-015

S. Wurmbrand

引用次数: 0

Allomorphy of Italian determiners at the morphology-phonology interface 意大利语限定词在词形-音系界面上的异形现象

From Sounds to Structures

Pub Date : 2018-09-10 DOI: 10.1515/9781501506734-010

Roberto Petrosino

引用次数: 1

On a-marking of object topics in the Italian left periphery 论意大利左翼边缘客体话题的a标记

From Sounds to Structures

Pub Date : 2018-09-10 DOI: 10.1515/9781501506734-016

A. Belletti

Standard Italian is known not to mark lexical direct objects through use of a preposition.1 This is in contrast with southern varieties, in which lexical direct objects are typically introduced by preposition a, as an instance of the Differential Object Marking/DOM phenomenon, found in several languages (Manzini and Franco 2016 for recent assessment of the phenomenon). In the closely related standard Spanish, to mention a well-known case, lexical direct objects are introduced by the same preposition a, with constraints depending on the nature of the direct object (such as e.g., its specificity and animacy). Thus, speakers of standard Italian judge sentences like (1) as ungrammatical, or else they typically attribute to these sentences a clear “southern” flavor:

众所周知，标准意大利语不通过使用介词来标记词汇上的直接宾语这与南方方言形成鲜明对比，在南方方言中，词汇直接宾语通常由介词a引入，这是在几种语言中发现的差异对象标记/DOM现象的一个例子(Manzini和Franco 2016年对这一现象的最新评估)。在密切相关的标准西班牙语中，举一个众所周知的例子，词汇直接宾语是由同一个介词a引入的，其约束取决于直接宾语的性质(例如，它的特殊性和animacy)。因此，说标准意大利语的人认为(1)这样的句子不符合语法，否则他们通常会给这些句子赋予一种明显的“南方”味道:

引用次数: 13

The phonology and phonetics of laryngeal stop contrasts in Assamese 阿萨姆语喉止音的音韵和语音对比

From Sounds to Structures

Pub Date : 2018-09-10 DOI: 10.1515/9781501506734-002

Hemanga Dutta, M. Kenstowicz

引用次数: 1

Subject and impersonal clitics in northern Italian dialects 意大利北部方言中的主客观政治

From Sounds to Structures

Pub Date : 2018-09-10 DOI: 10.1515/9781501506734-014

Diego Pescarini

The present contribution focuses on the interaction between the impersonal si/se and subject clitics in northern Italian dialects. In western dialects, si co-occurs with a non-agreeing clitic form (while it cannot co-occur with object clitics in the so-called passive-si construction); in Venetan dialects, the co-occurrence of se and subject clitics is degraded/ungrammatical, while in Friulian the combination is acceptable, but the subject clitic is dropped. I argue that the peculiar behaviour of northern Italian dialects results from the Multiple-Agree relation holding between T, sarb, and the argument of passive-like constructions (D'Alessandro 2007), coupled with language-specific constraints on the realisation of T's features (Calabrese & Pescarini 2014).

目前的贡献集中在意大利北部方言的客观的si/se和主体政治之间的相互作用。在西方方言中，“是”与不一致的定语从句同时出现(而在所谓的被动“是”结构中，它不能与宾语定语从句同时出现);在越南方言中，主词和主词同时出现是不符合语法的，而在弗留利语中，这种结合是可以接受的，但主词被抛弃了。我认为，意大利北部方言的特殊行为源于T, sarb和被动结构之间的多重同意关系(D'Alessandro 2007)，以及对T特征实现的语言特定限制(Calabrese & Pescarini 2014)。

引用次数: 1

Metaphony with unary elements 一元元的转喻

From Sounds to Structures

Pub Date : 2018-09-10 DOI: 10.1515/9781501506734-004

H. Hulst

In this article, I analyze several vowel harmony systems, generally referred to as metaphony. These systems (which come in many different varieties; see below) have been described or analyzed in terms of binary features, either using the feature [±high] (Walker 2005) or [±ATR] (Calabrese 2011) or in terms of unary features. In the latter case some authors have supported the use of unary features (Maiden 1991; Canalis 2016; d’Alessandro & van Oostendorp 2016), while others have argued against their use (Kaze 1991). In this article, I adopt the use of unary elements, such as the ‘AIU’ system that has been proposed in Dependency Phonology (Anderson & Ewen 1987), Government Phonology (Kaye, Lowenstamm & Vergnaud 1985), with some modifications that have been proposed in Radical CV Phonology (van der Hulst 2005, in prep.; van der Hulst & van de Weijer, to appear). My main goal is not to motivate in general that unary features are preferred over binary features. Rather, given that we use unary elements, I investigate which set of such features is required and how metaphony is best formally represented. Kaze (1991) has argued that an ‘AIU’ system fails to provide an adequate analysis of metaphony, based on the argument that in such a system it is not immediately obvious how one can account for processes that are triggered by high vowels (such as [i] and [u]), arguing that the ‘AIU’ system is unable to treat high vowels as a natural class of vowels that share the property ‘high’. Similar objections have been raised in Clements & Hume (1995). Staun (2003), making reference to discussions of other processes that seemingly require access to a feature [high] in dependency-based analyses, remarks that “[I]n each such account the notion of a negated component, in particular negated |a| has played a central part. [...] despite the claims of both Clements and Hume and Kaze, a unique specification of high vowels is perfectly possible within the dependency-based model, viz. as |~a|.” Clearly, there is a ‘risk’ in appealing to (the spreading of) negated elements when one advocated for a unary feature system. Here I will take a different route. Whatever the merits (and dangers) of using negated elements, the adoption of a unary system does by no means imply a necessary commitment to the ‘AIU’ set, without any other features. Indeed, Anderson and Ewen (1987), as well as Kaye, Lowenstamm and Vergnaud (1985), propose additional features. The set of features in binary or unary systems can vary, depending on various considerations, both empirical and theoretical. The choice between binarism or unarism does not depend on the analysis of specific processes. As discussed in Kaye (1988) and van der Hulst (2016a), postulating a unary system is by and large the null hypothesis, since, keeping the set of feature ‘names’ constant, treating these ‘names’ as unary features leads to a more restricted theory; it only allows for half the number of natural classes and processes. Additi

在这篇文章中，我分析了几个元音和谐系统，通常被称为转喻。这些系统(有许多不同的品种;(见下文)都是用二元特征来描述或分析的，要么使用特征[±high] (Walker 2005)，要么使用[±ATR] (Calabrese 2011)，要么使用一元特征。在后一种情况下，一些作者支持使用一元特征(Maiden 1991;Canalis 2016;d 'Alessandro & van Oostendorp 2016)，而其他人则反对使用它们(Kaze 1991)。在本文中，我采用了一元元素的使用，例如在《依赖音系学》(Anderson & Ewen 1987)、《政府音系学》(Kaye, Lowenstamm & Vergnaud 1985)中提出的“AIU”系统，并对《激进CV音系学》(van der Hulst 2005, In prep.;van der Hulst & van de Weijer)。我的主要目标并不是鼓励人们普遍认为一元特征比二元特征更受欢迎。相反，考虑到我们使用一元元素，我将研究需要哪一组这样的特征，以及如何最好地形式化地表示隐喻。Kaze(1991)认为，“AIU”系统未能提供对隐喻的充分分析，基于这样的论点，即在这样的系统中，如何解释由高元音(如[i]和[u])触发的过程并不是很明显，认为“AIU”系统无法将高元音视为具有“高”属性的自然元音类别。Clements & Hume(1995)也提出了类似的反对意见。Staun(2003)参考了对其他过程的讨论，这些过程似乎需要访问基于依赖性的分析中的特征[high]，他评论说:“在每个这样的解释中，否定组件的概念，特别是否定的[a]已经发挥了核心作用。”[…尽管克莱门茨、休谟和卡泽都有这样的主张，但在基于依赖的模型中，高元音的独特规范是完全可能的，即:【~a】。”显然，当一个人提倡一元特征系统时，诉诸(传播)否定元素是有“风险的”。在这里，我将采取不同的路线。无论使用否定元素的优点(和危险)是什么，一元系统的采用并不意味着在没有任何其他功能的情况下对“AIU”集的必要承诺。事实上，Anderson和Ewen(1987)以及Kaye、Lowenstamm和Vergnaud(1985)提出了其他特征。二元或一元系统的特征集可以变化，这取决于经验和理论的各种考虑。选择二元主义还是非二元主义并不取决于对具体过程的分析。正如Kaye(1988)和van der Hulst (2016a)所讨论的那样，假设一元系统基本上是零假设，因为保持特征“名称”的集合不变，将这些“名称”视为一元特征会导致更有限的理论;它只允许一半的自然类别和过程。此外，一元系统为乔姆斯基和哈雷(1968)第9章“指出”的标记性问题提供了正面的答案。由于这些原因，我的出发点是探索一元方法的结果，这需要对一元特征进行特定的选择。虽然“AIU”的功能集是有充分基础和广泛使用的，但我自己的

{"title":"Metaphony with unary elements","authors":"H. Hulst","doi":"10.1515/9781501506734-004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501506734-004","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I analyze several vowel harmony systems, generally referred to as metaphony. These systems (which come in many different varieties; see below) have been described or analyzed in terms of binary features, either using the feature [±high] (Walker 2005) or [±ATR] (Calabrese 2011) or in terms of unary features. In the latter case some authors have supported the use of unary features (Maiden 1991; Canalis 2016; d’Alessandro & van Oostendorp 2016), while others have argued against their use (Kaze 1991). In this article, I adopt the use of unary elements, such as the ‘AIU’ system that has been proposed in Dependency Phonology (Anderson & Ewen 1987), Government Phonology (Kaye, Lowenstamm & Vergnaud 1985), with some modifications that have been proposed in Radical CV Phonology (van der Hulst 2005, in prep.; van der Hulst & van de Weijer, to appear). My main goal is not to motivate in general that unary features are preferred over binary features. Rather, given that we use unary elements, I investigate which set of such features is required and how metaphony is best formally represented. Kaze (1991) has argued that an ‘AIU’ system fails to provide an adequate analysis of metaphony, based on the argument that in such a system it is not immediately obvious how one can account for processes that are triggered by high vowels (such as [i] and [u]), arguing that the ‘AIU’ system is unable to treat high vowels as a natural class of vowels that share the property ‘high’. Similar objections have been raised in Clements & Hume (1995). Staun (2003), making reference to discussions of other processes that seemingly require access to a feature [high] in dependency-based analyses, remarks that “[I]n each such account the notion of a negated component, in particular negated |a| has played a central part. [...] despite the claims of both Clements and Hume and Kaze, a unique specification of high vowels is perfectly possible within the dependency-based model, viz. as |~a|.” Clearly, there is a ‘risk’ in appealing to (the spreading of) negated elements when one advocated for a unary feature system. Here I will take a different route. Whatever the merits (and dangers) of using negated elements, the adoption of a unary system does by no means imply a necessary commitment to the ‘AIU’ set, without any other features. Indeed, Anderson and Ewen (1987), as well as Kaye, Lowenstamm and Vergnaud (1985), propose additional features. The set of features in binary or unary systems can vary, depending on various considerations, both empirical and theoretical. The choice between binarism or unarism does not depend on the analysis of specific processes. As discussed in Kaye (1988) and van der Hulst (2016a), postulating a unary system is by and large the null hypothesis, since, keeping the set of feature ‘names’ constant, treating these ‘names’ as unary features leads to a more restricted theory; it only allows for half the number of natural classes and processes. Additi","PeriodicalId":170731,"journal":{"name":"From Sounds to Structures","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134156865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

首页上一页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

From Sounds to Structures

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀