Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-11-05DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005004
Cameron R Kissick, Baylee S Techmanski, Paul Comfort, Timothy J Suchomel
Abstract: Kissick, CR, Techmanski, BS, Comfort, P, and Suchomel, TJ. The reliability, bias, differences, and agreement between velocity measurement devices during the hang clean pull. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): 289-294, 2025-This study examined the reliability, bias, differences, and agreement between the GymAware PowerTool (GA) and Tendo Power Analyzer (TENDO) during the hang clean pull (HCP). Fourteen resistance-trained men performed HCP repetitions with 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, and 140% of their 1 repetition maximum hang power clean (1RM HPC) with GA and TENDO devices attached to the barbell. Least-products regression was used to examine instances of proportional and fixed bias for mean barbell velocity (MBV) and peak barbell velocity (PBV) between devices. In addition, Hedge's g effect sizes were calculated to determine the magnitude of the differences between devices. Excellent reliability was displayed by the GA for all measurements. While excellent reliability for the TENDO was displayed for MBV across all loads, only moderate-good reliability was present for PBV at loads >80% 1RM. The TENDO displayed proportional bias for both MBV and PBV as well as fixed bias for PBV at 140% 1RM compared with the GA. Despite the small effect sizes that existed between devices for both MBV ( g = 0.35-0.57) and PBV ( g = 0.23-0.54), none of these differences were practically meaningful. The GA and TENDO are reliable devices that can measure MBV and PBV accurately during the HCP; however, practitioners should note that the TENDO may overestimate MBV and PBV to a small extent (3.7-6.8% and 1.8-2.9%).
{"title":"The Reliability, Bias, Differences, and Agreement Between Velocity Measurement Devices During the Hang Clean Pull.","authors":"Cameron R Kissick, Baylee S Techmanski, Paul Comfort, Timothy J Suchomel","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005004","DOIUrl":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Kissick, CR, Techmanski, BS, Comfort, P, and Suchomel, TJ. The reliability, bias, differences, and agreement between velocity measurement devices during the hang clean pull. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): 289-294, 2025-This study examined the reliability, bias, differences, and agreement between the GymAware PowerTool (GA) and Tendo Power Analyzer (TENDO) during the hang clean pull (HCP). Fourteen resistance-trained men performed HCP repetitions with 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, and 140% of their 1 repetition maximum hang power clean (1RM HPC) with GA and TENDO devices attached to the barbell. Least-products regression was used to examine instances of proportional and fixed bias for mean barbell velocity (MBV) and peak barbell velocity (PBV) between devices. In addition, Hedge's g effect sizes were calculated to determine the magnitude of the differences between devices. Excellent reliability was displayed by the GA for all measurements. While excellent reliability for the TENDO was displayed for MBV across all loads, only moderate-good reliability was present for PBV at loads >80% 1RM. The TENDO displayed proportional bias for both MBV and PBV as well as fixed bias for PBV at 140% 1RM compared with the GA. Despite the small effect sizes that existed between devices for both MBV ( g = 0.35-0.57) and PBV ( g = 0.23-0.54), none of these differences were practically meaningful. The GA and TENDO are reliable devices that can measure MBV and PBV accurately during the HCP; however, practitioners should note that the TENDO may overestimate MBV and PBV to a small extent (3.7-6.8% and 1.8-2.9%).</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"289-294"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142568981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005020
Mary C Geneau, David L Carey, Paul B Gastin, Sam Robertson, Lachlan P James
Abstract: Geneau, MC, Carey, DL, Gastin, PB, Robertson, S, and James, LP. Replicability of strength domains in Australian rules football athletes. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): e451-e457, 2025-Maximal lower body strength is a multidimensional construct defined as the maximum force application under specific task constraints. It is crucial for many athletic tasks and is frequently assessed in strength and conditioning environments. Recent technological advancements have increased the number of measurement options for lower body strength, making data interpretation and translation challenging. Principal component analyses (PCA) methods have been proposed to inform strength test and metric selection in field sport athletes, but these methods are limited to cross-sectional designs. This study aimed to investigated the replicability of a PCA method for metric reduction and selection at 2 time points. Thirty-three Australian rules football athletes completed 7 lower body extensor strength tests during preseason (T1) and end of season (T2), each resulting in 280 force-time metrics. At each time point, 9 PCA components were required to explain at least 70% of the variance in the data set, and 7 components demonstrated similar metric loadings onto the components. However, the variable selection procedure did not return the exact same set of variables at both time points. These results suggest that while the number and loading of strength domains are consistent in Australian rules football athletes, the variable selection procedure was not fully replicable. Overall, practitioners can use this information to select tests and metrics within the domains and subdomains identified in this study to capture a range of lower body strength information from their athletes.
{"title":"Replicability of Strength Domains in Australian Rules Football Athletes.","authors":"Mary C Geneau, David L Carey, Paul B Gastin, Sam Robertson, Lachlan P James","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005020","DOIUrl":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Geneau, MC, Carey, DL, Gastin, PB, Robertson, S, and James, LP. Replicability of strength domains in Australian rules football athletes. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): e451-e457, 2025-Maximal lower body strength is a multidimensional construct defined as the maximum force application under specific task constraints. It is crucial for many athletic tasks and is frequently assessed in strength and conditioning environments. Recent technological advancements have increased the number of measurement options for lower body strength, making data interpretation and translation challenging. Principal component analyses (PCA) methods have been proposed to inform strength test and metric selection in field sport athletes, but these methods are limited to cross-sectional designs. This study aimed to investigated the replicability of a PCA method for metric reduction and selection at 2 time points. Thirty-three Australian rules football athletes completed 7 lower body extensor strength tests during preseason (T1) and end of season (T2), each resulting in 280 force-time metrics. At each time point, 9 PCA components were required to explain at least 70% of the variance in the data set, and 7 components demonstrated similar metric loadings onto the components. However, the variable selection procedure did not return the exact same set of variables at both time points. These results suggest that while the number and loading of strength domains are consistent in Australian rules football athletes, the variable selection procedure was not fully replicable. Overall, practitioners can use this information to select tests and metrics within the domains and subdomains identified in this study to capture a range of lower body strength information from their athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"e451-e457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142864713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005005
Evelien Van Roie, Jannique van Uffelen, Christophe Delecluse
Abstract: Van Roie, E, van Uffelen, J, and Delecluse, C. Stair-climbing versus machine-based resistance exercise to improve muscle power among older adults: a non-inferiority trial. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): e496-e505, 2025-Machine-based resistance training (RT) can reduce the age-related loss in muscle power ( Pmax ). However, weight-bearing exercises have greater potential for implementation. This study investigated whether stair-climbing exercise (STAIR) was non-inferior to improve Pmax compared with machine-based RT among older adults. Functional capacity tests were secondary outcomes. Older adults (30♂ and 16♀; 70.9 ± 4.3 years) were randomly assigned to RT or STAIR ( n = 23 per group). Supervised laboratory-based training sessions were performed 2 times per week for 12 weeks. In week 1-4, exercises were performed at controlled speed (hypertrophy-oriented; 4 × 12-15 repetitions; 55% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) in RT; step-up exercise with height of 30-40 cm in STAIR), in week 5-12 as fast as possible (power-oriented, 4 × 12 repetitions; 40% of 1RM for RT and 4 × 2 flights of 6 steps for STAIR). Leg-extensor Pmax and functional capacity were measured pre-intervention and post-intervention, and Pmax also after 4 weeks of training. Gains in Pmax were not statistically different in RT (19.5 ± 12.2%) and STAIR (13.7 ± 16.5%) ( d = 0.39, pint = 0.086), whereas non-inferiority analyses were inconclusive (between-group difference in gains: 5.8% (95% CI -3.1 to 14.6); non-inferiority limit 3.9%). STAIR increased more in stair ascent performance ( d = 0.45-0.61, pint < 0.05) than RT. STAIR and RT improved similarly on 10-m fast walk, 5-repetition sit-to-stand, and countermovement jump ( pint > 0.05). To conclude, STAIR and RT both induced significant changes in Pmax and functional capacity in older adults. STAIR was beneficial over RT for gains in stair-climbing performance. Future research should investigate the effects of STAIR in a home-based unsupervised setting.
Abstract: Van Roie, E, van Uffelen, J, and Delecluse, C. Stair-climbing versus machine-based resistance exercise to improve muscle power among older adults: a non-inferiority trial.J Strength Cond Res XX(X):000-000,2024-机器阻力训练(RT)可减少与年龄有关的肌肉力量(Pmax)损失。然而,负重练习具有更大的实施潜力。本研究调查了与机器阻力训练相比,爬楼梯运动(STAIR)在改善老年人最大肌力方面是否无劣势。功能能力测试是次要结果。老年人(30♂岁和16♀岁;70.9±4.3岁)被随机分配到RT或STAIR(每组23人)。在实验室指导下进行训练,每周2次,为期12周。在第 1-4 周,训练以可控速度进行(以肥大为导向;4 × 12-15 次重复;RT 为 1 次最大重量(1RM)的 55%;STAIR 为高度为 30-40 厘米的台阶练习);在第 5-12 周,尽可能快地进行(以力量为导向,4 × 12 次重复;RT 为 1RM 的 40%,STAIR 为 4 × 2 飞行 6 个台阶)。在干预前和干预后测量了腿部伸肌最大限度和功能能力,并在训练 4 周后测量了最大限度。RT(19.5 ± 12.2%)和 STAIR(13.7 ± 16.5%)的 Pmax 增幅在统计学上没有差异(d = 0.39,pint = 0.086),而非劣效性分析则没有结论(组间增幅差异为 5.8% (95% CI = 0.5%)):5.8%(95% CI -3.1-14.6);非劣效限制为 3.9%)。与 RT 相比,STAIR 在爬楼梯能力方面的提高幅度更大(d = 0.45-0.61,pint < 0.05)。STAIR 和 RT 在 10 米快走、5 次重复坐立和反向运动跳跃方面的提高相似(pint > 0.05)。总之,STAIR 和 RT 都能使老年人的最大负重和功能能力发生显著变化。在提高爬楼梯能力方面,STAIR 比 RT 更有优势。未来的研究应调查 STAIR 在家庭无监督环境下的效果。
{"title":"Stair-Climbing Versus Machine-Based Resistance Exercise to Improve Muscle Power Among Older Adults: A Noninferiority Trial.","authors":"Evelien Van Roie, Jannique van Uffelen, Christophe Delecluse","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005005","DOIUrl":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Van Roie, E, van Uffelen, J, and Delecluse, C. Stair-climbing versus machine-based resistance exercise to improve muscle power among older adults: a non-inferiority trial. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): e496-e505, 2025-Machine-based resistance training (RT) can reduce the age-related loss in muscle power ( Pmax ). However, weight-bearing exercises have greater potential for implementation. This study investigated whether stair-climbing exercise (STAIR) was non-inferior to improve Pmax compared with machine-based RT among older adults. Functional capacity tests were secondary outcomes. Older adults (30♂ and 16♀; 70.9 ± 4.3 years) were randomly assigned to RT or STAIR ( n = 23 per group). Supervised laboratory-based training sessions were performed 2 times per week for 12 weeks. In week 1-4, exercises were performed at controlled speed (hypertrophy-oriented; 4 × 12-15 repetitions; 55% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) in RT; step-up exercise with height of 30-40 cm in STAIR), in week 5-12 as fast as possible (power-oriented, 4 × 12 repetitions; 40% of 1RM for RT and 4 × 2 flights of 6 steps for STAIR). Leg-extensor Pmax and functional capacity were measured pre-intervention and post-intervention, and Pmax also after 4 weeks of training. Gains in Pmax were not statistically different in RT (19.5 ± 12.2%) and STAIR (13.7 ± 16.5%) ( d = 0.39, pint = 0.086), whereas non-inferiority analyses were inconclusive (between-group difference in gains: 5.8% (95% CI -3.1 to 14.6); non-inferiority limit 3.9%). STAIR increased more in stair ascent performance ( d = 0.45-0.61, pint < 0.05) than RT. STAIR and RT improved similarly on 10-m fast walk, 5-repetition sit-to-stand, and countermovement jump ( pint > 0.05). To conclude, STAIR and RT both induced significant changes in Pmax and functional capacity in older adults. STAIR was beneficial over RT for gains in stair-climbing performance. Future research should investigate the effects of STAIR in a home-based unsupervised setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"e496-e505"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142729842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005011
Andreas H Gundersen, Roland van den Tillaar, Hallvard N Falch, Andrea B Fredriksen, Stian Larsen
Abstract: Gundersen, AH, van den Tillaar, R, Falch, HN, Fredriksen, AB, and Larsen, S. A biomechanical comparison between conventional, sumo, and hex-bar deadlifts among resistance trained women. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): 281-288, 2025-The deadlift is a multijoint exercise frequently used to strengthen the lower extremities and spinal erectors. Despite variations, such as the conventional, sumo, and hex-bar deadlifts, little is known about how these techniques affect the concentric phase of maximal deadlifts among strength trained women. Therefore, this study used statistical parametric mapping to compare kinematics, net joint moments (NJMs), and surface electromyography amplitude between these deadlift variations during the last repetition of a 3 repetition maximum (3RM) in strength trained women. Eleven women (body mass: 67.64 ± 7.27 kg, height: 161.91 ± 3.05 cm, age: 23.18 ± 3.46 years) performed 3RM deadlifts in conventional, sumo, and hex-bar deadlifts, lifting 103.18 ± 18.47, 101.54 ± 15.01, and 99.70 ± 15.94 kg, respectively. The main findings showed that deadlifting with conventional and sumo techniques resulted in larger hip NJMs near the lockout. Conversely, deadlifting with the hex-bar technique resulted in greater barbell velocity, knee NJMs, and increased hip and knee flexion angles. Therefore, when training maximal 3RM deadlifts, we suggest that hex-bar deadlifts may be beneficial for targeting knee extensors and enhancing barbell velocity among strength trained women. Conversely, sumo and conventional deadlifts may be more effective for targeting the hip extensors near the lockout during the last repetition of 3RM deadlifts.
摘要:Gundersen, AH, van den Tillaar, R, Falch, HN, Fredriksen, AB和Larsen, S.对女性阻力训练中传统、相扑和六杠硬举的生物力学比较。[J]力量杂志XX(X): 000- 000,2024 -硬举是一种多关节运动,经常用于加强下肢和脊柱竖立肌。尽管有一些变化,如传统的、相击的和六杠的硬举,但对于这些技术如何影响力量训练的女性最大硬举的同心阶段,我们知之甚少。因此,本研究使用统计参数映射来比较运动、净关节力矩(NJMs)和表面肌电图振幅在力量训练女性最后3次最大重复(3RM)时这些硬举变化之间的差异。11名女性(体重:67.64±7.27 kg,身高:161.91±3.05 cm,年龄:23.18±3.46岁)完成常规、相扑、六杠三种类型的3RM硬举,分别完成103.18±18.47、101.54±15.01、99.70±15.94 kg。主要研究结果表明,采用传统和相扑技术进行硬举会导致髋关节闭锁附近出现较大的NJMs。相反,用六杠技术进行硬举可以提高杠铃速度,提高膝关节NJMs,增加髋关节和膝关节的屈曲角度。因此,当训练最大3RM硬举时,我们建议在力量训练的女性中,六杠硬举可能有利于针对膝关节伸肌和提高杠铃速度。相反,相扑和传统的硬举在最后一次重复3RM硬举时,可能更有效地针对锁定附近的髋伸肌。
{"title":"A Biomechanical Comparison Between Conventional, Sumo, and Hex-Bar Deadlifts Among Resistance Trained Women.","authors":"Andreas H Gundersen, Roland van den Tillaar, Hallvard N Falch, Andrea B Fredriksen, Stian Larsen","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005011","DOIUrl":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Gundersen, AH, van den Tillaar, R, Falch, HN, Fredriksen, AB, and Larsen, S. A biomechanical comparison between conventional, sumo, and hex-bar deadlifts among resistance trained women. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): 281-288, 2025-The deadlift is a multijoint exercise frequently used to strengthen the lower extremities and spinal erectors. Despite variations, such as the conventional, sumo, and hex-bar deadlifts, little is known about how these techniques affect the concentric phase of maximal deadlifts among strength trained women. Therefore, this study used statistical parametric mapping to compare kinematics, net joint moments (NJMs), and surface electromyography amplitude between these deadlift variations during the last repetition of a 3 repetition maximum (3RM) in strength trained women. Eleven women (body mass: 67.64 ± 7.27 kg, height: 161.91 ± 3.05 cm, age: 23.18 ± 3.46 years) performed 3RM deadlifts in conventional, sumo, and hex-bar deadlifts, lifting 103.18 ± 18.47, 101.54 ± 15.01, and 99.70 ± 15.94 kg, respectively. The main findings showed that deadlifting with conventional and sumo techniques resulted in larger hip NJMs near the lockout. Conversely, deadlifting with the hex-bar technique resulted in greater barbell velocity, knee NJMs, and increased hip and knee flexion angles. Therefore, when training maximal 3RM deadlifts, we suggest that hex-bar deadlifts may be beneficial for targeting knee extensors and enhancing barbell velocity among strength trained women. Conversely, sumo and conventional deadlifts may be more effective for targeting the hip extensors near the lockout during the last repetition of 3RM deadlifts.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"281-288"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142869422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005050
Steven M Hirsch, Christopher J Chapman, Harjiv Singh, Daniel G Baker, David M Frost
Abstract: Hirsch, SM, Chapman, CJ, Singh, H, Baker, DG, and Frost, DM. A critical appraisal of using barbell velocity data to regulate training. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): 360-372, 2025-Practitioners must balance numerous training variables to ensure they do not impose too much nor too little training stress on their athlete. As an athlete's capacity can fluctuate based on their preparedness for training, the intended vs. actual training intensity in a fixed training program may not coincide. Similarly, the training set volume that an athlete should be exposed to may fluctuate depending on their current state. A discrepancy between intended vs. actual training intensity and volume could negatively impact subsequent training adaptations. Thus, researchers and practitioners have advocated for "autoregulation," whereby the volume and intensity of training are automatically adjusted based on the athlete's preparedness. One proposed method of autoregulating resistance training is by using barbell velocity data. However, it is unclear whether, and under which contexts, these data are appropriate for regulating resistance training. Therefore, the purpose of this literature review was to critically examine the current research on using barbell velocity data to regulate resistance training intensity and volume. After examining the relevant literature, it is the authors' belief that the current data do not support using velocity data to precisely regulate resistance training intensity. However, it is the authors' belief that the current literature does suggest that researchers and practitioners can leverage these data to regulate other aspects of resistance training, such as athlete motivation, autonomy, and focus of attention, which could also impact the resulting adaptations from training. Overall, more research is required to better understand how researchers and practitioners should use velocity data to guide training.
{"title":"A Critical Appraisal of Using Barbell Velocity Data to Regulate Training.","authors":"Steven M Hirsch, Christopher J Chapman, Harjiv Singh, Daniel G Baker, David M Frost","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005050","DOIUrl":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005050","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Hirsch, SM, Chapman, CJ, Singh, H, Baker, DG, and Frost, DM. A critical appraisal of using barbell velocity data to regulate training. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): 360-372, 2025-Practitioners must balance numerous training variables to ensure they do not impose too much nor too little training stress on their athlete. As an athlete's capacity can fluctuate based on their preparedness for training, the intended vs. actual training intensity in a fixed training program may not coincide. Similarly, the training set volume that an athlete should be exposed to may fluctuate depending on their current state. A discrepancy between intended vs. actual training intensity and volume could negatively impact subsequent training adaptations. Thus, researchers and practitioners have advocated for \"autoregulation,\" whereby the volume and intensity of training are automatically adjusted based on the athlete's preparedness. One proposed method of autoregulating resistance training is by using barbell velocity data. However, it is unclear whether, and under which contexts, these data are appropriate for regulating resistance training. Therefore, the purpose of this literature review was to critically examine the current research on using barbell velocity data to regulate resistance training intensity and volume. After examining the relevant literature, it is the authors' belief that the current data do not support using velocity data to precisely regulate resistance training intensity. However, it is the authors' belief that the current literature does suggest that researchers and practitioners can leverage these data to regulate other aspects of resistance training, such as athlete motivation, autonomy, and focus of attention, which could also impact the resulting adaptations from training. Overall, more research is required to better understand how researchers and practitioners should use velocity data to guide training.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":"39 3","pages":"360-372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143458332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005008
Carlos García-Sánchez, Ester Jiménez-Ormeño, Jose María Lominchar-Ramos, Verónica Giráldez-Costas, John J McMahon, Marcos A Soriano
Abstract: García-Sánchez, C, Jiménez-Ormeño, E, Lominchar-Ramos, JM, Giráldez-Costas, V, McMahon, JJ, and Soriano, MA. Effects of a short-term detraining period on neuromuscular performance in female handball players. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): e469-e477, 2025-The aim of this study was to determine the effects of a 3-week detraining period on lower limbs' neuromuscular performance in female handball players. Fourteen semi-professional players (age: 20.50 ± 2.98 years; height: 1.67 ± 0.06 m; body mass: 66.89 ± 8.75 kg) were evaluated using force plates on 3 separate occasions to assess the maximum and rapid force production by the isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) and the ballistic capabilities by countermovement jump (CMJ). The intraclass correlation coefficient, coefficient of variation, standard error of the measurement, and smallest detectable difference were calculated using the first 2 testing sessions. Pre- and postdetraining differences were calculated comparing the first and third testing sessions, using paired t -tests or Wilcoxon test when appropriate and Hedges g effect sizes (ES). The level of significance was set at ρ ≤ 0.05. There were no significant or meaningful differences in maximum and rapid force production capabilities assessed during the IMTP ( p > 0.05). However, there was a significant detriment with small ES in CMJ jump height, modified reactive strength index, peak and mean propulsive force, peak and mean braking force, and braking phase duration ( p < 0.05). These findings suggest that although maximum and rapid force production capabilities were not altered among female handball players after a 3-week detraining period, their ballistic capabilities decreased, especially those affecting the eccentric part of a fast dynamic task. They also highlight the importance of testing, planning, and programming in response to the fluctuations in handball players' physical performance over the season.
摘要: García-Sánchez, C, Jiménez-Ormeño, E, Lominchar-Ramos, JM, Giráldez-Costas, V, McMahon, JJ, and Soriano, MA.短期非训练期对女子手球运动员神经肌肉表现的影响。J Strength Cond Res XX(X):000-000,2024-本研究旨在确定为期三周的脱离训练期对女子手球运动员下肢神经肌肉表现的影响。对 14 名半职业球员(年龄:20.50 ± 2.98 岁;身高:1.67 ± 0.06 米;体重:66.89 ± 8.75 千克)进行了 3 次不同场合的测力板评估,以评估等长大腿中部牵拉(IMTP)的最大和快速发力,以及反向运动跳跃(CMJ)的弹跳能力。通过前两次测试,计算出了类内相关系数、变异系数、测量标准误差和可检测到的最小差异。在适当的情况下,使用配对 t 检验或 Wilcoxon 检验以及 Hedges g 效应量(ES)计算训练前和训练后的差异。显著性水平设定为 ρ ≤ 0.05。在 IMTP 期间评估的最大和快速发力能力没有明显或有意义的差异(P > 0.05)。然而,在 CMJ 跳高、修正的反应力量指数、推进力峰值和平均值、制动力峰值和平均值以及制动阶段持续时间方面,小 ES 存在明显的不利影响(p < 0.05)。这些研究结果表明,虽然经过 3 周的脱离训练后,女子手球运动员的最大和快速发力能力没有发生变化,但她们的弹道能力下降了,尤其是影响快速动态任务中偏心部分的能力。这些研究还强调了针对手球运动员在赛季中体能表现的波动进行测试、计划和编程的重要性。
{"title":"Effects of a Short-Term Detraining Period on Neuromuscular Performance in Female Handball Players.","authors":"Carlos García-Sánchez, Ester Jiménez-Ormeño, Jose María Lominchar-Ramos, Verónica Giráldez-Costas, John J McMahon, Marcos A Soriano","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005008","DOIUrl":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>García-Sánchez, C, Jiménez-Ormeño, E, Lominchar-Ramos, JM, Giráldez-Costas, V, McMahon, JJ, and Soriano, MA. Effects of a short-term detraining period on neuromuscular performance in female handball players. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): e469-e477, 2025-The aim of this study was to determine the effects of a 3-week detraining period on lower limbs' neuromuscular performance in female handball players. Fourteen semi-professional players (age: 20.50 ± 2.98 years; height: 1.67 ± 0.06 m; body mass: 66.89 ± 8.75 kg) were evaluated using force plates on 3 separate occasions to assess the maximum and rapid force production by the isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) and the ballistic capabilities by countermovement jump (CMJ). The intraclass correlation coefficient, coefficient of variation, standard error of the measurement, and smallest detectable difference were calculated using the first 2 testing sessions. Pre- and postdetraining differences were calculated comparing the first and third testing sessions, using paired t -tests or Wilcoxon test when appropriate and Hedges g effect sizes (ES). The level of significance was set at ρ ≤ 0.05. There were no significant or meaningful differences in maximum and rapid force production capabilities assessed during the IMTP ( p > 0.05). However, there was a significant detriment with small ES in CMJ jump height, modified reactive strength index, peak and mean propulsive force, peak and mean braking force, and braking phase duration ( p < 0.05). These findings suggest that although maximum and rapid force production capabilities were not altered among female handball players after a 3-week detraining period, their ballistic capabilities decreased, especially those affecting the eccentric part of a fast dynamic task. They also highlight the importance of testing, planning, and programming in response to the fluctuations in handball players' physical performance over the season.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"e469-e477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142729689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005002
Johnathan Polletta, Kevin Leung, David Diaz, Nicole Branum, Monique Mokha
Abstract: Polletta, J, Leung, K, Diaz, D, Branum, N, and Mokha, M. Influence of interlimb lean muscle mass asymmetry on countermovement jump neuromuscular performance qualities among American football players. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): 325-331, 2025-Body composition is a determinant of athletic performance. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of lower limb lean muscle mass (LMM) asymmetry on countermovement jump (CMJ) performance and kinetic asymmetry during both eccentric and concentric CMJ phases. Seventy-four American football players (age, 23.0 ± 0.9 years; height, 1.86 ± 0.07 m; mass, 104.9 ± 21.6 kg; lean body mass, 88.7 ± 12.5 kg) training for the 2024 National Football League draft underwent body composition assessment using an InBody 270 bioelectrical impedance analyzer that yielded right and left leg LMM in kg. Subjects then performed 3 CMJs on dual uniaxial force plates that allowed for the calculation of jump height (JH), reactive strength index modified (RSImod), and interlimb percentage asymmetry of peak force and impulse for eccentric and concentric phases. A paired t -test and Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficients calculated the difference between left and right LMM and the associations between the symmetry variables, respectively, p ≤ 0.05. Right and left leg LMM were significantly different (t(73) = 3.772, p ≤ 0.001). However, no significant relationships were found between lower limb LMM asymmetry (0.67 ± 0.67%) and any asymmetry in CMJ eccentric peak force (4.77 ± 3.75%), r (72) = 0.001, p = 0.954; eccentric deceleration impulse (5.23 ± 4.36%), r (72) = 0.158, p = 0.180; concentric peak force (2.99 ± 2.54%), r (72) = -0.70, p = 0.553; concentric impulse (3.06 ± 2.97%), r (72) = 111, p = 0.347; JH (41.8 ± 7.3 cm), r (72) = -0.205, p = 0.08; or RSImod (0.53 ± 0.14 m·s -1 ), r (72) = -0.151, p = 0.199. The magnitude of LMM asymmetry did not influence CMJ performance or asymmetry magnitude. Reducing CMJ kinetic asymmetry may require targeted programming, especially for the eccentric loading phase.
{"title":"Influence of Interlimb Lean Muscle Mass Asymmetry on Countermovement Jump Neuromuscular Performance Qualities Among American Football Players.","authors":"Johnathan Polletta, Kevin Leung, David Diaz, Nicole Branum, Monique Mokha","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005002","DOIUrl":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Polletta, J, Leung, K, Diaz, D, Branum, N, and Mokha, M. Influence of interlimb lean muscle mass asymmetry on countermovement jump neuromuscular performance qualities among American football players. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): 325-331, 2025-Body composition is a determinant of athletic performance. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of lower limb lean muscle mass (LMM) asymmetry on countermovement jump (CMJ) performance and kinetic asymmetry during both eccentric and concentric CMJ phases. Seventy-four American football players (age, 23.0 ± 0.9 years; height, 1.86 ± 0.07 m; mass, 104.9 ± 21.6 kg; lean body mass, 88.7 ± 12.5 kg) training for the 2024 National Football League draft underwent body composition assessment using an InBody 270 bioelectrical impedance analyzer that yielded right and left leg LMM in kg. Subjects then performed 3 CMJs on dual uniaxial force plates that allowed for the calculation of jump height (JH), reactive strength index modified (RSImod), and interlimb percentage asymmetry of peak force and impulse for eccentric and concentric phases. A paired t -test and Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficients calculated the difference between left and right LMM and the associations between the symmetry variables, respectively, p ≤ 0.05. Right and left leg LMM were significantly different (t(73) = 3.772, p ≤ 0.001). However, no significant relationships were found between lower limb LMM asymmetry (0.67 ± 0.67%) and any asymmetry in CMJ eccentric peak force (4.77 ± 3.75%), r (72) = 0.001, p = 0.954; eccentric deceleration impulse (5.23 ± 4.36%), r (72) = 0.158, p = 0.180; concentric peak force (2.99 ± 2.54%), r (72) = -0.70, p = 0.553; concentric impulse (3.06 ± 2.97%), r (72) = 111, p = 0.347; JH (41.8 ± 7.3 cm), r (72) = -0.205, p = 0.08; or RSImod (0.53 ± 0.14 m·s -1 ), r (72) = -0.151, p = 0.199. The magnitude of LMM asymmetry did not influence CMJ performance or asymmetry magnitude. Reducing CMJ kinetic asymmetry may require targeted programming, especially for the eccentric loading phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"325-331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142729803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005007
Camilla De Bleecker, Stefan Vermeulen, Tine Willems, Veerle Segers, Valentien Spanhove, Rowan Leys, Jos Vanrenterghem, Roel De Ridder
Abstract: De Bleecker, C, Vermeulen, S, Willems, T, Segers, V, Spanhove, V, Leys, R, Vanrenterghem, J, and De Ridder, R. Validation of impact forces estimated by wearable device VERT in volleyball validation impact forces VERT. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): e458-e462, 2025-As volleyball players are exposed to high volumes of forceful jump-landing actions, the risk of injuries is increased. Wearable technology such as the VERT device offers a promising avenue for load monitoring of volleyball players, potentially allowing better control of intensity of training and matches to minimize the likelihood of injuries. Although validity of jump counts and jump height is well investigated, studies validating impact forces estimated by VERT device referenced to force plate data are scarce. The objective of this study was to validate the use of VERT for the estimation of impact forces during volleyball. Twenty-one volleyball players of different levels performed countermovement jumps (CMJ), block jumps, spike jumps, and a set with a combination of several volleyball jump-landing tasks. Impact forces estimated by VERT were compared with resultant force values measured using a force plate. A total of 221 spike jumps, 286 block jumps, and 203 CMJ were analyzed. Given the identified proportional bias and heteroscedasticity, an adapted Bland-Altman plot featuring the line of best fit and V-shaped 95% confidence intervals instead of classic limits of agreement was created. Furthermore, our results suggest a proportional bias between the 2 measurements, with the VERT sensor tending to overestimate impact forces compared with the force plate, increasingly at higher mean values. Therefore, the VERT algorithm has not been proven valid for quantifying impact forces. However, a correction factor is proposed to obtain better results for impact forces estimated by VERT, making it suitable for implementation in sport contexts.
Abstract: De Bleecker, C, Vermeulen, S, Willems, T, Segers, V, Spanhove, V, Leys, R, Vanrenterghem, J, and De Ridder, R. Validation of impact forces estimated by wearable device VERT in volleyball validation impact forces VERT.J Strength Cond Res XX(X):000-000,2024-随着排球运动员暴露在大量的用力起跳落地动作中,受伤的风险也随之增加。像 VERT 设备这样的可穿戴技术为排球运动员的负荷监测提供了一个前景广阔的途径,有可能更好地控制训练和比赛的强度,从而最大限度地降低受伤的可能性。尽管对跳起次数和跳起高度的有效性进行了深入研究,但对 VERT 设备参照测力板数据估算的冲击力进行验证的研究却很少。本研究的目的是验证使用 VERT 估算排球运动中的冲击力。21 名不同水平的排球运动员分别进行了反向运动跳(CMJ)、拦网跳、扣杀跳和一组排球起跳落地任务。通过 VERT 估算的冲击力与使用测力板测量的结果力值进行了比较。共分析了 221 次扣球跳、286 次拦网跳和 203 次 CMJ。考虑到已发现的比例偏差和异方差性,我们绘制了经过调整的布兰-阿尔特曼图,该图以最佳拟合线和 V 型 95% 置信区间为特征,而不是传统的一致性极限。此外,我们的研究结果表明,两种测量方法之间存在比例偏差,与测力板相比,VERT 传感器倾向于高估冲击力,在平均值较高的情况下尤其如此。因此,VERT 算法在量化冲击力方面并不有效。不过,我们提出了一个修正系数,以获得 VERT 所估算的冲击力的更佳结果,使其适合在体育运动中使用。
{"title":"Validation of Impact Forces Estimated by Wearable Device VERT in Volleyball.","authors":"Camilla De Bleecker, Stefan Vermeulen, Tine Willems, Veerle Segers, Valentien Spanhove, Rowan Leys, Jos Vanrenterghem, Roel De Ridder","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005007","DOIUrl":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>De Bleecker, C, Vermeulen, S, Willems, T, Segers, V, Spanhove, V, Leys, R, Vanrenterghem, J, and De Ridder, R. Validation of impact forces estimated by wearable device VERT in volleyball validation impact forces VERT. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): e458-e462, 2025-As volleyball players are exposed to high volumes of forceful jump-landing actions, the risk of injuries is increased. Wearable technology such as the VERT device offers a promising avenue for load monitoring of volleyball players, potentially allowing better control of intensity of training and matches to minimize the likelihood of injuries. Although validity of jump counts and jump height is well investigated, studies validating impact forces estimated by VERT device referenced to force plate data are scarce. The objective of this study was to validate the use of VERT for the estimation of impact forces during volleyball. Twenty-one volleyball players of different levels performed countermovement jumps (CMJ), block jumps, spike jumps, and a set with a combination of several volleyball jump-landing tasks. Impact forces estimated by VERT were compared with resultant force values measured using a force plate. A total of 221 spike jumps, 286 block jumps, and 203 CMJ were analyzed. Given the identified proportional bias and heteroscedasticity, an adapted Bland-Altman plot featuring the line of best fit and V-shaped 95% confidence intervals instead of classic limits of agreement was created. Furthermore, our results suggest a proportional bias between the 2 measurements, with the VERT sensor tending to overestimate impact forces compared with the force plate, increasingly at higher mean values. Therefore, the VERT algorithm has not been proven valid for quantifying impact forces. However, a correction factor is proposed to obtain better results for impact forces estimated by VERT, making it suitable for implementation in sport contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"e458-e462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142729878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005017
Violet E Sullivan, Amanda P Ares, Summer B Cook
{"title":"Cardiorespiratory, Metabolic, and Perceptual Responses to Blood Flow Restricted Running in Female Distance Runners.","authors":"Violet E Sullivan, Amanda P Ares, Summer B Cook","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005017","DOIUrl":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"318-324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142869468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-11-05DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004991
Trey D W Job, John B Cronin, Ryan Crotin, Matthew R Cross
{"title":"Acute Effects of Wearable Resistance Applied to the Throwing Arm on Performance in Baseball Pitchers.","authors":"Trey D W Job, John B Cronin, Ryan Crotin, Matthew R Cross","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004991","DOIUrl":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004991","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"340-346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142568967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}