Journal of spine surgery最新文献

Background: Infection of the spine after surgical procedures is one of the most dreaded complications of spinal fusion surgery. Treatment goals are to eradicate the necrotic and infected tissue and to obtain a correct spinal profile. Traditionally many authors have recommended the posterolateral or double approach, anterior and posterior. Total en bloc spondylectomy is a surgical procedure traditionally used to treat primary and metastatic tumors. The use of this surgical procedure in treatment of chronic vertebral osteomyelitis is not clearly defined in literature.

Case description: This case involved a 66-year-old female patient with a history of T9-S1 instrumentation after several surgeries, who developed chronic osteomyelitis of T8-T9 with extensive destruction of the vertebral body and severe thoracic kyphosis. After targeted antibiotic therapy, total en bloc spondylectomy of T8-T9 was performed according to the Tomita technique. Necrotic and infected tissues were removed proceeding as if it were chronic osteomyelitis of long bones and performing en bloc resection with clear margins, that is, applying the criteria of oncological surgery to this chronic infection. After resection, the sagittal plane is reconstructed in the affected segment, restoring the normal distance between the two healthy vertebrae and the mechanical stability of the spine.

Conclusions: Total en bloc spondylectomy in the treatment of extensive infectious lesions with a mechanical component allows performing en bloc resection of infected and necrotic tissue along with biological and mechanical reconstruction. In our case, the complete resection of the infected bone and soft tissues achieved good outcome without complications. We propose total en bloc spondylectomy as a reasonable treatment option in complicated spondylodiscitis progressing to extensive chronic osteomyelitis and compromising spinal stability due to a significant loss of bone material.

Background and objective: To highlight the surgical anatomy, procedural variations, presentation, and management of sympathetic nerve injury after surgery of the lumbar spine.

Methods: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for publications that were completed between 1951 and 2021. Relevant full-text articles published in the English language were selected and critically reviewed.

Key content and findings: Sympathetic injury is a highly variable postsurgical complication with a greater incidence after an anterior or oblique approach to the lumbar spine compared to posterior and lateral approaches. The direct and extreme lateral approaches reduce the need to disturb sympathetic nerves thus reducing the risk of complications. It can present in multiple manners, including complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and retrograde ejaculation. These complications can be transient and resolve spontaneously or be treated with medications, physical therapy, and spinal blocks. The severity of the conditions and extent of recovery can vary drastically, with some patients never fully recovering.

Conclusions: To access the lumbar spine, there are operational approaches and techniques that should be used to decrease the risk of intraoperative injury. It is crucial to understand the advantages and risks to different approaches and take the necessary steps to minimize complications. Early identification of dysfunction and adequate management of symptoms are imperative to effectively manage patients with lumbar sympathetic trunk and sympathetic nerve fiber injuries.

Background and objective: This is a narrative review with the objective to discuss available assistive technologies for spinal surgery. Characteristics, costs, and compatibility of the different systems are summarized and recommendations made regarding acquiring these technologies. The availability of assistive technologies in spine surgery continues to evolve rapidly. The literature is lacking a collective summary of the available technologies and guidelines for acquisition. This is a narrative review which (I) presents an up-to-date summary of the currently available assistive technologies in spinal surgery; (II) makes comment on the utility of imaging, navigation, and robotics; (III) makes recommendations for the utility of the platform based on hospital size and (IV) discuss factors involved in negotiating for the purchase of these new technologies.

Methods: We assemble the most up-to-date collection of description, characteristics and pricing of assistive technologies in spinal surgery. We compare and contrast these technologies and make recommendations regarding acquisition.

Key content and findings: These technologies require a learning-curve for the surgeon and the operating room staff to understand how to use them efficiently. Surgeons need to be involved in the process of purchase decisions. Surgeons occupy a unique position in the health care infrastructure as their approach to care has significant ramifications on both the quality and cost of care. Surgeons should maintain conviction that their training and practice has allowed the use of these technologies to provide safer and more effective care for patients.

Conclusions: Assistive technologies and prostheses for spinal fusion are evolving rapidly. This article serves as an encompassing reference to the current technologies. These technologies will play a significant role in the delivery of spinal health care in the future. All stakeholders stand to benefit from the increased value these technologies bring to patient care.