Journal of spine surgery最新文献

Background: Although pelvic obliquity (PO) is a risk factor for postoperative coronal decompensation in corrective surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), especially Lenke 5C, methods of measuring PO are controversial. This study aimed to establish an appropriate measurement method using multiplanar reconstructed computed tomography (MPR-CT) images instead of standing posteroanterior (PA) whole-spine radiographs to evaluate PO in patients with Lenke 5C AIS.

Methods: This study was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Twenty-five patients who underwent corrective surgery for AIS in Osaka University Hospital from August 2014 to February 2023 were included. Cobb angle, L5 tilt, C7 plumb line to center sacral vertebral line (C7PL-CSVL), and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were measured on standing PA whole-spine radiographs preoperatively. Sacral obliquity (SO), the slope of the upper endplate of S1, and iliac obliquity (IO), the tilt of the line connecting the iliac crests, were measured on standing PA whole-spine radiographs and MPR-CT (SO/IO-X-ray, SO/IO-CT, respectively). S1 angle and S2 angle were measured on CT.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 18.7±3.9 years and all of them were females. SO-X-ray and SO-CT were larger than IO-X-ray and IO-CT, respectively. SO-X-ray was highly correlated with SO-CT (r=0.838, P<0.001). L5 tilt had higher correlation with SO-CT (r=0.884, P<0.001) than with SO-X-ray (r=0.726, P=0.001) and IO-CT (r=0.550, P=0.22). L5 tilt was correlated poorly with IO-X-ray (r=0.104, P=0.69). The S1 angle was 4.5±3.5° meanwhile the S2 angle was 1.2±2.1°, the sacral deformity was mainly due to the S1 vertebral wedging.

Conclusions: Given the asymmetric sacral morphology, SO is more appropriate pelvic parameter than IO to represent the sacral tilt of Lenke 5C AIS, especially when measured using CT images to overcome the poor visibility on PA whole-spine radiographs.

Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery typically involves posterior spinal fusion (PSF) using rods contoured by the surgeon, which may be time-consuming and may not reliably restore optimal sagittal alignment. However, pre-contoured patient-specific rods may more optimally restore sagittal spinal alignment. This study evaluates the radiographic outcomes of AIS patients who underwent PSF utilizing surgeon contoured vs. pre-contoured rods.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of AIS patients who underwent PSF with either surgeon contoured or pre-contoured rods. Demographics, Lenke classification, fused levels, osteotomies, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical time were also obtained via chart review. Coronal curve magnitude, T5-T12 thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), PI-LL mismatch, and T1 pelvic angle (TPA) were obtained pre-operatively, postoperatively and at last follow up. Outcome measures included rate of achievement of postoperative radiographic alignment goals (TK between 20 and 40 degrees, PI-LL mismatch within 10 degrees, and TPA <14 degrees). Predicted post-operative sagittal alignment was also compared with observed measurements. Student's and paired t-tests were performed to determine significant mean differences for continuous variables, and chi-square for categorical variables.

Results: No differences were found in demographics, Lenke classification, preop radiographic measurements, fused levels, osteotomies, EBL, and surgical time in the surgeon contoured cohort (n=36; average follow up 11.3 months) and pre-contoured cohort (n=22; average follow up 9.7 months). At last follow up, 95.5% of patients with pre-contoured rods vs. 61.1% of patients with surgeon contoured rods (P=0.004) met TK goal. During assessment of first standing postoperative X-ray, 72.7% of patients with pre-contoured rods vs. 33.3% of patients with surgeon contoured rods met PI-LL mismatch goal (P=0.004). Other radiographic measurements were similar. Artificial intelligence (AI) predicted and observed differences for the pre-contoured group were 3.7 for TK (P=0.005), -7.6 for PI-LL mismatch (P=0.002), and -2.6 for TPA (P=0.11).

Conclusions: AI and pre-contoured rods help achieve global sagittal balance with high accuracy and improved kyphosis restoration and PI-LL mismatch than surgeon contoured rods in AIS patients.

Background: For patients undergoing long-construct fusion surgeries, simultaneous sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion is a growing trend in spine surgery. Some options for posterior SIJ fusion include 3D-printed triangular titanium implants or self-harvesting SIJ screws. Both implants require fixation within the sacrum and ileum. Fat embolism syndrome is a rare but known complication of lumbar pedicle instrumentation but has never been reported in association with SIJ fusion, regardless of implant type. We report the first two known cases of fat embolism associated with placement of SIJ fusion devices during long construct posterior spine fusion.

Case description: Case 1-a 50-year-old female with multiple previous spine surgeries complicated by osteomyelitis/diskitis that was successfully eradicated, underwent T10-pelvis posterior spinal fusion (PSF), L4 pedicle-subtracting-osteotomy, and bilateral SIJ fusion. During implantation of each SIJ fusion device, the patient's hemodynamic status deteriorated necessitating vasopressor support, intravenous fluid bolus, and hyperventilation, but quickly resolved. The case was completed without further issue, and she had an uneventful post-operative course. Case 2-a 71-year-old female with a past medical history of ankylosing spondylitis, previous L2-L5 PSF, rheumatoid arthritis on chronic steroids, underwent a T9-pelvis PSF, bilateral SIJ fusion, L4 pedicle subtraction osteotomy, T10-L1 Smith Peterson osteotomies. After implantation of the second SIJ fusion device, she became hypotensive and tachycardic, pulses were absent, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated. Pulses returned quickly, the index surgery was terminated, and she was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). In the ICU she was quickly weaned off the ventilator on post-operative day 1. On post-operative day 4, the patient returned to the operating room for completion of the surgery and had an extended, but uneventful, recovery afterwards.

Conclusions: We report on the first two known cases of fat embolism syndrome occurring immediately after implantation of SIJ fusion devices. Spine surgeons should be aware of this rare, but potentially fatal, complication. Collaboration with the anesthesia team and optimization of the patient's hemodynamic status prior to implantation may help prevent catastrophic complications.

Background: The principles of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) aim to reduce the physiological stress of surgery which in turn improve clinical and health economic outcomes. There is ample evidence in literature supporting ERAS methodologies in other surgical specialties, but its adoption in spinal surgery, especially in Australia remains in infancy. The aim of this project is to describe the early experience with an evidence-based ERAS pathway for simple spine surgery, a first of its kind in Australia.

Methods: An ERAS protocol was designed using an evidenced-based review of the literature. The authors then conducted a prospective cohort analysis looking at outcome of patients undergoing elective spinal (lumbar and cervical) decompression surgery under ERAS principles by a single surgeon on the Westmead Hospital Campus between March 2021 to May 2023. Primary outcomes were patient length of stay (LOS), patient reported pain and disability scores and complications (including readmissions within 30 days and re-operation within 6 months). Secondary outcomes included predictors of failure for same-day discharge.

Results: A total of 52 patients underwent spinal decompression surgeries under the ERAS protocol. Overall 43 out of 52 patients (83.7%) were successfully discharged on the same day as their surgery. Patient reported outcomes were improved at 6 weeks and 6 months confirming durability of intervention. The rates of complications were similar to literature reported rates for simple lumbar or cervical decompression procedures and there were no readmissions within 30 days or re-operations within 6 months of surgery. Being of non-English speaking background [odds ratio (OR) =6.08, P=0.04] and from home alone (OR =10.25, P=0.03) were predictors of failure of same day discharge in this small cohort.

Conclusions: Implementation of ERAS protocols for simple spinal decompression surgeries is feasible and produces durable improved patient outcomes while reducing LOS in hospitals. Patient social factors can be predictive of lack of compliance.

Background: Surgical site complications (SSCs) contribute to increased healthcare costs. Predictive analytics can aid in identifying high-risk patients and implementing optimization strategies. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk-assessment score for SSC-associated readmissions (SSC-ARs) in patients undergoing open spine surgery.

Methods: The Premier Healthcare Database (PHD) of adult patients (n=157,664; 3,182 SSC-ARs) between January 2019 and September 2020 was used for retrospective data analysis to create an SSC risk score using mixed effects logistic regression modeling. Full and reduced models were developed using patient-, facility-, or procedure-related predictors. The full model used 37 predictors and the reduced used 19.

Results: The reduced model exhibited fair discriminatory capability (C-statistic =74.12%) and demonstrated better model fit [Pearson chi-square/degrees of freedom (DF) =0.93] compared to the full model (C-statistic =74.56%; Pearson chi-square/DF =0.92). The risk scoring system, based on the reduced model, comprised the following factors: female (1 point), blood disorder [2], congestive heart failure [2], dementia [3], chronic pulmonary disease [2], rheumatic disease [3], hypertension [2], obesity [2], severe comorbidity [2], nicotine dependence [1], liver disease [2], paraplegia and hemiplegia [3], peripheral vascular disease [2], renal disease [2], cancer [1], diabetes [2], revision surgery [2], operative hours ≥5 [4], emergency/urgent surgery [2]. A final risk score (sum of the points for each surgery; range, 0-40) was validated using a 1,000-surgery random hold-out sample (C-statistic =85.16%).

Conclusions: The resulting SSC-AR risk score, composed of readily obtainable clinical information, could serve as a robust predictive tool for unplanned readmissions related to wound complications in the preoperative setting of open spine surgery.