Background Early (grade 1) cardiac left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (G1DD) increases the risk for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and may improve with aggressive risk factor modification. Type 2 diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and coronary heart disease are associated with increased incidence of diastolic dysfunction. The genetic drivers of G1DD are not defined. Methods and Results We curated genotyped European ancestry G1DD cases (n=668) and controls with normal diastolic function (n=1772) from Vanderbilt's biobank. G1DD status was explored through (1) an additive model genome-wide association study, (2) shared polygenic risk through logistic regression, and (3) instrumental variable analysis using 2-sample Mendelian randomization (the inverse-variance weighted method, Mendelian randomization-Egger, and median) to determine potential modifiable risk factors. There were no common single nucleotide polymorphisms significantly associated with G1DD status. A polygenic risk score for BMI was significantly associated with increased G1DD risk (odds ratio [OR], 1.20 for 1-SD increase in BMI [95% CI, 1.08-1.32]; P=0.0003). The association was confirmed by the inverse-variance weighted method (OR, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.37-2.61]). Among the candidate mediators for BMI, only fasting glucose was significantly associated with G1DD status by the inverse-variance weighted method (OR, 4.14 for 1-SD increase in fasting glucose [95% CI, 1.55-11.02]; P=0.005). Multivariable Mendelian randomization showed a modest attenuation of the BMI association (OR, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.35-2.52]) when adjusting for fasting glucose. Conclusions These data suggest that a genetic predisposition to elevated BMI increases the risk for G1DD. Part of this effect may be mediated through altered glucose homeostasis.
Background Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) have been of great interest as an alternative to transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (TV-ICDs). No meta-analyses synthesizing data from high-quality studies have yet been published. Methods and Results An electronic literature search was conducted to retrieve randomized controlled trials or propensity score-matched studies comparing S-ICD against TV-ICD in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indication. The primary outcomes were device-related complications and lead-related complications. Secondary outcomes were inappropriate shocks, appropriate shock, all-cause mortality, and infection. All outcomes were pooled under random-effects meta-analyses and reported as risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs. Kaplan-Meier curves of device-related complications were digitized to retrieve individual patient data and pooled under a 1-stage meta-analysis using Cox models to determine hazard ratios (HRs) of patients undergoing S-ICD versus TV-ICD. A total of 5 studies (2387 patients) were retrieved. S-ICD had a similar rate of device-related complications compared with TV-ICD (RR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.33-1.04]; P=0.070), but a significantly lower lead-related complication rate (RR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.07-0.29]; P<0.0001). The individual patient data-based 1-stage stratified Cox model for device-related complications across 4 studies yielded no significant difference (shared-frailty HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.61-1.09]; P=0.167), but visual inspection of pooled Kaplan-Meier curves suggested a divergence favoring S-ICD. Secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between both modalities. Conclusions S-ICD is clinically superior to TV-ICD in terms of lead-related complications while demonstrating comparable efficacy and safety. For device-related complications, S-ICD may be beneficial over TV-ICD in the long term. These indicate that S-ICD is likely a suitable substitute for TV-ICD in patients requiring implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation without a pacing indication.

