首页 > 最新文献

Journal of the American Medical Association最新文献

英文 中文
Management of Depression. 抑郁症管理。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.18399
Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi, Sigfried Kasper, Pedro Morgado
{"title":"Management of Depression.","authors":"Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi, Sigfried Kasper, Pedro Morgado","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.18399","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.18399","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1673-1674"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142468582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management of Depression. 抑郁症管理。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.18396
Toshi A Furukawa
{"title":"Management of Depression.","authors":"Toshi A Furukawa","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.18396","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.18396","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1674"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142468581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management of Depression-Reply. 抑郁症的管理--回复。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.18405
Gregory Simon, Nathalie Moise, David C Mohr
{"title":"Management of Depression-Reply.","authors":"Gregory Simon, Nathalie Moise, David C Mohr","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.18405","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.18405","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1674-1675"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142468584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Diagnosis. 诊断结果
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.14691
Edward John Gaudet
{"title":"The Diagnosis.","authors":"Edward John Gaudet","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.14691","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.14691","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":"332 19","pages":"1677"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142668144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Restrictive vs Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Acute Brain Injury: The TRAIN Randomized Clinical Trial. 急性脑损伤患者的限制性输血与自由输血策略:TRAIN 随机临床试验。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.20424
Fabio Silvio Taccone, Carla Rynkowski Bittencourt, Kirsten Møller, Piet Lormans, Manuel Quintana-Díaz, Anselmo Caricato, Marco Antonio Cardoso Ferreira, Rafael Badenes, Pedro Kurtz, Christian Baastrup Søndergaard, Kirsten Colpaert, Leticia Petterson, Herve Quintard, Raphael Cinotti, Elisa Gouvêa Bogossian, Cassia Righy, Serena Silva, Erik Roman-Pognuz, Catherine Vandewaeter, Daniel Lemke, Olivier Huet, Ata Mahmoodpoor, Aaron Blandino Ortiz, Mathieu van der Jagt, Russell Chabanne, Walter Videtta, Pierre Bouzat, Jean-Louis Vincent
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Blood transfusions are commonly administered to patients with acute brain injury. The optimal hemoglobin transfusion threshold is uncertain in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact on neurological outcome of 2 different hemoglobin thresholds to guide red blood cell transfusions in patients with acute brain injury.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Multicenter, phase 3, parallel-group, investigator-initiated, pragmatic, open-label randomized clinical trial conducted in 72 intensive care units across 22 countries. Eligible patients had traumatic brain injury, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, or intracerebral hemorrhage; hemoglobin values below 9 g/dL within the first 10 days after injury; and an expected intensive care unit stay of at least 72 hours. Enrollment occurred between September 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022. The last day of follow-up was June 30, 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Eight hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned to undergo a liberal (transfusion triggered by hemoglobin <9 g/dL; n = 408) or a restrictive (transfusion triggered by hemoglobin <7 g/dL; n = 442) transfusion strategy over a 28-day period.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was occurrence of an unfavorable neurological outcome, defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score between 1 and 5, at 180 days following randomization. There were 14 prespecified serious adverse events, including occurrence of cerebral ischemia after randomization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 820 patients who completed the trial (mean age, 51 years; 376 [45.9%] women), 806 had available data on the primary outcome, 393 in the liberal strategy group and 413 in the restrictive strategy group. The liberal strategy group received a median of 2 (IQR, 1-3) units of blood, and the restrictive strategy group received a median of 0 (IQR, 0-1) units of blood, with an absolute mean difference of 1.0 unit (95% CI, 0.87-1.12 units). At 180 days after randomization, 246 patients (62.6%) in the liberal strategy group had an unfavorable neurological outcome compared with 300 patients (72.6%) in the restrictive strategy group (absolute difference, -10.0% [95% CI, -16.5% to -3.6%]; adjusted relative risk, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.79-0.94]; P = .002). The effect of the transfusion thresholds on neurological outcome at 180 days was consistent across prespecified subgroups. In the liberal strategy group, 35 (8.8%) of 397 patients had at least 1 cerebral ischemic event compared with 57 (13.5%) of 423 in the restrictive strategy group (relative risk, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.44-0.97]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Patients with acute brain injury and anemia randomized to a liberal transfusion strategy were less likely to have an unfavorable neurological outcome than those randomized to a restrictive strategy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </str
重要性:急性脑损伤患者通常需要输血。在这一患者群体中,最佳血红蛋白输血阈值尚不确定:评估两种不同的血红蛋白阈值对急性脑损伤患者输注红细胞的影响:多中心、3 期、平行组、研究者发起、务实、开放标签随机临床试验,在 22 个国家的 72 个重症监护病房进行。符合条件的患者需患有创伤性脑损伤、动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血或脑内出血;伤后头 10 天内血红蛋白值低于 9 g/dL;预计重症监护病房住院时间至少 72 小时。入组时间为 2017 年 9 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日。随访的最后一天是 2023 年 6 月 30 日:八百五十名患者被随机分配接受自由输血(由血红蛋白引发的输血):主要结果是随机分配后 180 天内出现不利的神经系统结果,即格拉斯哥结果量表扩展评分在 1 到 5 分之间。预设的严重不良事件有14起,包括随机化后发生脑缺血:在完成试验的 820 名患者中(平均年龄 51 岁;女性 376 人 [45.9%]),806 人有主要结果数据,其中自由策略组 393 人,限制策略组 413 人。自由策略组收到的血液中位数为 2(IQR,1-3)个单位,限制策略组收到的血液中位数为 0(IQR,0-1)个单位,绝对平均差异为 1.0 个单位(95% CI,0.87-1.12 个单位)。随机分组后 180 天,自由策略组中有 246 名患者(62.6%)的神经系统结果不佳,而限制策略组中有 300 名患者(72.6%)的神经系统结果不佳(绝对差异为 -10.0% [95% CI, -16.5% to -3.6%];调整后相对风险为 0.86 [95% CI, 0.79-0.94]; P = .002)。输血阈值对 180 天后神经系统预后的影响在预设亚组中是一致的。在自由策略组中,397 名患者中有 35 人(8.8%)至少发生过一次脑缺血事件,而在限制策略组中,423 名患者中有 57 人(13.5%)发生过脑缺血事件(相对风险为 0.65 [95% CI, 0.44-0.97]):结论和相关性:随机采用自由输血策略的急性颅脑损伤和贫血患者比随机采用限制性输血策略的患者更不可能出现不利的神经系统结果:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02968654。
{"title":"Restrictive vs Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Acute Brain Injury: The TRAIN Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Fabio Silvio Taccone, Carla Rynkowski Bittencourt, Kirsten Møller, Piet Lormans, Manuel Quintana-Díaz, Anselmo Caricato, Marco Antonio Cardoso Ferreira, Rafael Badenes, Pedro Kurtz, Christian Baastrup Søndergaard, Kirsten Colpaert, Leticia Petterson, Herve Quintard, Raphael Cinotti, Elisa Gouvêa Bogossian, Cassia Righy, Serena Silva, Erik Roman-Pognuz, Catherine Vandewaeter, Daniel Lemke, Olivier Huet, Ata Mahmoodpoor, Aaron Blandino Ortiz, Mathieu van der Jagt, Russell Chabanne, Walter Videtta, Pierre Bouzat, Jean-Louis Vincent","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.20424","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.20424","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;Blood transfusions are commonly administered to patients with acute brain injury. The optimal hemoglobin transfusion threshold is uncertain in this patient population.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To assess the impact on neurological outcome of 2 different hemoglobin thresholds to guide red blood cell transfusions in patients with acute brain injury.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;Multicenter, phase 3, parallel-group, investigator-initiated, pragmatic, open-label randomized clinical trial conducted in 72 intensive care units across 22 countries. Eligible patients had traumatic brain injury, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, or intracerebral hemorrhage; hemoglobin values below 9 g/dL within the first 10 days after injury; and an expected intensive care unit stay of at least 72 hours. Enrollment occurred between September 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022. The last day of follow-up was June 30, 2023.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interventions: &lt;/strong&gt;Eight hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned to undergo a liberal (transfusion triggered by hemoglobin &lt;9 g/dL; n = 408) or a restrictive (transfusion triggered by hemoglobin &lt;7 g/dL; n = 442) transfusion strategy over a 28-day period.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;The primary outcome was occurrence of an unfavorable neurological outcome, defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score between 1 and 5, at 180 days following randomization. There were 14 prespecified serious adverse events, including occurrence of cerebral ischemia after randomization.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Among 820 patients who completed the trial (mean age, 51 years; 376 [45.9%] women), 806 had available data on the primary outcome, 393 in the liberal strategy group and 413 in the restrictive strategy group. The liberal strategy group received a median of 2 (IQR, 1-3) units of blood, and the restrictive strategy group received a median of 0 (IQR, 0-1) units of blood, with an absolute mean difference of 1.0 unit (95% CI, 0.87-1.12 units). At 180 days after randomization, 246 patients (62.6%) in the liberal strategy group had an unfavorable neurological outcome compared with 300 patients (72.6%) in the restrictive strategy group (absolute difference, -10.0% [95% CI, -16.5% to -3.6%]; adjusted relative risk, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.79-0.94]; P = .002). The effect of the transfusion thresholds on neurological outcome at 180 days was consistent across prespecified subgroups. In the liberal strategy group, 35 (8.8%) of 397 patients had at least 1 cerebral ischemic event compared with 57 (13.5%) of 423 in the restrictive strategy group (relative risk, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.44-0.97]).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;Patients with acute brain injury and anemia randomized to a liberal transfusion strategy were less likely to have an unfavorable neurological outcome than those randomized to a restrictive strategy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Trial registration: &lt;/str","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1623-1633"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142391487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
JAMA. 美国医学会杂志
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.18457
{"title":"JAMA.","authors":"","doi":"10.1001/jama.2023.18457","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2023.18457","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":"332 19","pages":"1595-1596"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142668138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Shifting Balance of the Risk-Benefit of Restrictive Transfusion Strategies in Neurocritically Ill Patients-Is Less Still More? 神经重症患者限制性输血策略的风险-收益平衡变化--"少 "还是 "多"?
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.20416
Alexis F Turgeon, François Lauzier
{"title":"Shifting Balance of the Risk-Benefit of Restrictive Transfusion Strategies in Neurocritically Ill Patients-Is Less Still More?","authors":"Alexis F Turgeon, François Lauzier","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.20416","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.20416","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1615-1617"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142391488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Surgery of the Heart. 心脏外科
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.18459
{"title":"The Surgery of the Heart.","authors":"","doi":"10.1001/jama.2023.18459","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2023.18459","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1678"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142502801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Zerlasiran-A Small-Interfering RNA Targeting Lipoprotein(a): A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. Zerlasiran-A 小干扰 RNA 靶向脂蛋白(a):2期随机临床试验。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.21957
Steven E Nissen, Qiuqing Wang, Stephen J Nicholls, Ann Marie Navar, Kausik K Ray, Gregory G Schwartz, Michael Szarek, Erik S G Stroes, Roland Troquay, Jannick A N Dorresteijn, Henry Fok, David A Rider, Steven Romano, Kathy Wolski, Curtis Rambaran

Importance: Elevated lipoprotein(a) increases the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic stenosis.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of zerlasiran, a small-interfering RNA targeting hepatic synthesis of apolipoprotein(a), on lipoprotein(a) serum concentration.

Design, setting, and participants: A multicenter trial in patients with stable ASCVD with serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations greater than or equal to 125 nmol/L at 26 sites in Europe and South Africa between January 3, 2023, and April 27, 2023, with last follow-up on July 1, 2024.

Interventions: Participants randomized to receive a subcutaneous dose of placebo every 16 weeks for 3 doses (n = 23) or every 24 weeks for 2 doses (n = 24) or zerlasiran 450 mg every 24 weeks for 2 doses (n = 45), 300 mg every 16 weeks for 3 doses (n = 42), or 300 mg every 24 weeks for 2 doses (n = 44).

Main outcome and measures: The primary outcome was the time-averaged percent change in lipoprotein(a) concentration from baseline to 36 weeks, with follow-up to 60 weeks.

Results: Among 178 patients, mean (SD) age was 63.7 (9.4) years, 46 (25.8%) were female, with a median (IQR) baseline lipoprotein(a) concentration of 213 (177-282) nmol/L; 172 patients completed the trial. Compared with the pooled placebo group, the least-squares mean time-averaged percent change in lipoprotein(a) concentration from baseline to week 36 was -85.6% (95% CI, -90.9% to -80.3%), -82.8% (95% CI, -88.2% to -77.4%), and -81.3% (95% CI, -86.7% to -76.0%) for the 450 mg every 24 weeks, 300 mg every 16 weeks, and 300 mg every 24 weeks groups, respectively. Median (IQR) percent change in lipoprotein(a) concentration at week 36 was -94.5% (-97.3% to -84.2%) for the 450 mg every 24 weeks group, -96.4% (-97.7% to -92.3%) for the 300 mg every 16 weeks group, and -90.0% (-93.7% to -81.3%) for the 300 mg every 24 weeks group. The most common treatment-related adverse effects were injection site reactions, with mild pain occurring in 2.3% to 7.1% of participants in the first day following drug administration. There were 20 serious adverse events in 17 patients, none considered related to the study drug.

Conclusions: Zerlasiran was well-tolerated and reduced time-averaged lipoprotein(a) concentration by more than 80% during 36 weeks of treatment in patients with ASCVD.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05537571.

重要性:脂蛋白(a)升高会增加动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)和主动脉狭窄的风险:评估以肝脏合成脂蛋白(a)为靶点的小干扰RNA泽拉西坦对脂蛋白(a)血清浓度的影响:多中心试验:2023年1月3日至2023年4月27日期间,在欧洲和南非的26个地点对血清脂蛋白(a)浓度大于或等于125 nmol/L的稳定型ASCVD患者进行试验,最后一次随访时间为2024年7月1日:参与者随机接受皮下注射安慰剂,每 16 周一次,共 3 次(n = 23),或每 24 周一次,共 2 次(n = 24),或 zerlasiran 450 毫克,每 24 周一次,共 2 次(n = 45),300 毫克,每 16 周一次,共 3 次(n = 42),或 300 毫克,每 24 周一次,共 2 次(n = 44):主要结果是脂蛋白(a)浓度从基线到 36 周的时间平均百分比变化,随访至 60 周:在178名患者中,平均(标清)年龄为63.7(9.4)岁,女性46人(25.8%),脂蛋白(a)基线浓度中位数(IQR)为213(177-282)nmol/L;172名患者完成了试验。与汇总的安慰剂组相比,从基线到第36周,每24周450毫克组、每16周300毫克组和每24周300毫克组脂蛋白(a)浓度的最小二乘平均时间平均百分比变化率分别为-85.6%(95% CI,-90.9%至-80.3%)、-82.8%(95% CI,-88.2%至-77.4%)和-81.3%(95% CI,-86.7%至-76.0%)。每24周服用450毫克组、每16周服用300毫克组和每24周服用300毫克组在第36周时脂蛋白(a)浓度变化的中位数(IQR)百分比分别为-94.5%(-97.3%至-84.2%)、-96.4%(-97.7%至-92.3%)和-90.0%(-93.7%至-81.3%)。最常见的治疗相关不良反应是注射部位反应,2.3%至7.1%的参与者在用药后第一天出现轻微疼痛。17名患者共发生了20起严重不良反应,但均与研究药物无关:结论:Zerlasiran的耐受性良好,在对ASCVD患者进行36周的治疗期间,其时间平均脂蛋白(a)浓度降低了80%以上:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT05537571。
{"title":"Zerlasiran-A Small-Interfering RNA Targeting Lipoprotein(a): A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Steven E Nissen, Qiuqing Wang, Stephen J Nicholls, Ann Marie Navar, Kausik K Ray, Gregory G Schwartz, Michael Szarek, Erik S G Stroes, Roland Troquay, Jannick A N Dorresteijn, Henry Fok, David A Rider, Steven Romano, Kathy Wolski, Curtis Rambaran","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.21957","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.21957","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Elevated lipoprotein(a) increases the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic stenosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of zerlasiran, a small-interfering RNA targeting hepatic synthesis of apolipoprotein(a), on lipoprotein(a) serum concentration.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A multicenter trial in patients with stable ASCVD with serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations greater than or equal to 125 nmol/L at 26 sites in Europe and South Africa between January 3, 2023, and April 27, 2023, with last follow-up on July 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants randomized to receive a subcutaneous dose of placebo every 16 weeks for 3 doses (n = 23) or every 24 weeks for 2 doses (n = 24) or zerlasiran 450 mg every 24 weeks for 2 doses (n = 45), 300 mg every 16 weeks for 3 doses (n = 42), or 300 mg every 24 weeks for 2 doses (n = 44).</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the time-averaged percent change in lipoprotein(a) concentration from baseline to 36 weeks, with follow-up to 60 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 178 patients, mean (SD) age was 63.7 (9.4) years, 46 (25.8%) were female, with a median (IQR) baseline lipoprotein(a) concentration of 213 (177-282) nmol/L; 172 patients completed the trial. Compared with the pooled placebo group, the least-squares mean time-averaged percent change in lipoprotein(a) concentration from baseline to week 36 was -85.6% (95% CI, -90.9% to -80.3%), -82.8% (95% CI, -88.2% to -77.4%), and -81.3% (95% CI, -86.7% to -76.0%) for the 450 mg every 24 weeks, 300 mg every 16 weeks, and 300 mg every 24 weeks groups, respectively. Median (IQR) percent change in lipoprotein(a) concentration at week 36 was -94.5% (-97.3% to -84.2%) for the 450 mg every 24 weeks group, -96.4% (-97.7% to -92.3%) for the 300 mg every 16 weeks group, and -90.0% (-93.7% to -81.3%) for the 300 mg every 24 weeks group. The most common treatment-related adverse effects were injection site reactions, with mild pain occurring in 2.3% to 7.1% of participants in the first day following drug administration. There were 20 serious adverse events in 17 patients, none considered related to the study drug.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Zerlasiran was well-tolerated and reduced time-averaged lipoprotein(a) concentration by more than 80% during 36 weeks of treatment in patients with ASCVD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05537571.</p>","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574722/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142668118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Oral Muvalaplin for Lowering of Lipoprotein(a): A Randomized Clinical Trial. 降低脂蛋白(a)的口服 Muvalaplin:随机临床试验
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.24017
Stephen J Nicholls, Wei Ni, Grace M Rhodes, Steven E Nissen, Ann Marie Navar, Laura F Michael, Axel Haupt, John H Krege

Importance: Muvalaplin inhibits lipoprotein(a) formation. A 14-day phase 1 study demonstrated that muvalaplin was well tolerated and reduced lipoprotein(a) levels up to 65%. The effect of longer administration of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels in individuals at high cardiovascular risk remains uncertain.

Objectives: To determine the effect of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels and to assess safety and tolerability.

Design, setting, and participants: Phase 2, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial enrolling 233 participants with lipoprotein(a) concentrations of 175 nmol/L or greater with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or familial hypercholesterolemia at 43 sites in Asia, Europe, Australia, Brazil, and the United States between December 10, 2022, and November 22, 2023.

Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive orally administered muvalaplin at dosages of 10 mg/d (n = 34), 60 mg/d (n = 64), or 240 mg/d (n = 68) or placebo (n = 67) for 12 weeks.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was the placebo-adjusted percentage change from baseline in lipoprotein(a) molar concentration at week 12, using an assay to measure intact lipoprotein(a) and a traditional apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Secondary end points included the percentage change in apolipoprotein B and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Results: The median age of study participants was 66 years; 33% were female; and 27% identified as Asian, 4% as Black, and 66% as White. Muvalaplin resulted in placebo-adjusted reductions in lipoprotein(a) of 47.6% (95% CI, 35.1%-57.7%), 81.7% (95% CI, 78.1%-84.6%), and 85.8% (95% CI, 83.1%-88.0%) for the 10-mg/d, 60-mg/d, and 240-mg/d dosages, respectively, using an intact lipoprotein(a) assay and 40.4% (95% CI, 28.3%-50.5%), 70.0% (95% CI, 65.0%-74.2%), and 68.9% (95% CI, 63.8%-73.3%) using an apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Dose-dependent reductions in apolipoprotein B were observed at 8.9% (95% CI, -2.2% to 18.8%), 13.1% (95% CI, 4.4%-20.9%), and 16.1% (95% CI, 7.8%-23.7%) at 10 mg/d, 60 mg/d, and 240 mg/d, respectively. No change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was observed. No safety or tolerability concerns were observed at any dosage.

Conclusions and relevance: Muvalaplin reduced lipoprotein(a) measured using intact lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a)-based assays and was well tolerated. The effect of muvalaplin on cardiovascular events requires further investigation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05563246.

重要性:Muvalaplin 可抑制脂蛋白(a)的形成。一项为期 14 天的 1 期研究表明,muvalaplin 的耐受性良好,可降低脂蛋白(a)水平达 65%。对于心血管风险较高的人群,长期服用muvalaplin对脂蛋白(a)水平的影响仍不确定:确定muvalaplin对脂蛋白(a)水平的影响,并评估其安全性和耐受性:2期、安慰剂对照、随机、双盲试验,于2022年12月10日至2023年11月22日期间在亚洲、欧洲、澳大利亚、巴西和美国的43个地点招募233名脂蛋白(a)浓度大于或等于175 nmol/L、患有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病、糖尿病或家族性高胆固醇血症的参与者:参与者随机接受口服muvalaplin,剂量为10毫克/天(n = 34)、60毫克/天(n = 64)或240毫克/天(n = 68)或安慰剂(n = 67),为期12周:主要终点是第12周时经安慰剂调整后的脂蛋白(a)摩尔浓度与基线相比的百分比变化,采用的测定方法是完整脂蛋白(a)测定法和传统的基于载脂蛋白(a)的测定法。次要终点包括载脂蛋白B和高敏C反应蛋白的百分比变化:研究参与者的中位年龄为 66 岁,33% 为女性,27% 为亚洲人,4% 为黑人,66% 为白人。经安慰剂调整后,服用 10 毫克/天的 Muvalaplin 可使脂蛋白(a)降低 47.6%(95% CI,35.1%-57.7%)、81.7%(95% CI,78.1%-84.6%)和 85.8%(95% CI,83.1%-88.0%)。使用基于脂蛋白(a)的检测方法,10 毫克/天、60 毫克/天和 240 毫克/天剂量的降低率分别为 40.4%(95% CI,28.3%-50.5%)、70.0%(95% CI,65.0%-74.2%)和 68.9%(95% CI,63.8%-73.3%)。在 10 毫克/天、60 毫克/天和 240 毫克/天时,脂蛋白 B 的剂量依赖性降低分别为 8.9%(95% CI,-2.2%-18.8%)、13.1%(95% CI,4.4%-20.9%)和 16.1%(95% CI,7.8%-23.7%)。未观察到高敏C反应蛋白的变化。在任何剂量下均未观察到安全性或耐受性问题:使用完整脂蛋白(a)和基于载脂蛋白(a)的检测方法测量脂蛋白(a)时,木伐拉普林可降低脂蛋白(a),且耐受性良好。muvalaplin对心血管事件的影响还需进一步研究:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT05563246。
{"title":"Oral Muvalaplin for Lowering of Lipoprotein(a): A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Stephen J Nicholls, Wei Ni, Grace M Rhodes, Steven E Nissen, Ann Marie Navar, Laura F Michael, Axel Haupt, John H Krege","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.24017","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.24017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Muvalaplin inhibits lipoprotein(a) formation. A 14-day phase 1 study demonstrated that muvalaplin was well tolerated and reduced lipoprotein(a) levels up to 65%. The effect of longer administration of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels in individuals at high cardiovascular risk remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the effect of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels and to assess safety and tolerability.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Phase 2, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial enrolling 233 participants with lipoprotein(a) concentrations of 175 nmol/L or greater with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or familial hypercholesterolemia at 43 sites in Asia, Europe, Australia, Brazil, and the United States between December 10, 2022, and November 22, 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomized to receive orally administered muvalaplin at dosages of 10 mg/d (n = 34), 60 mg/d (n = 64), or 240 mg/d (n = 68) or placebo (n = 67) for 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end point was the placebo-adjusted percentage change from baseline in lipoprotein(a) molar concentration at week 12, using an assay to measure intact lipoprotein(a) and a traditional apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Secondary end points included the percentage change in apolipoprotein B and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of study participants was 66 years; 33% were female; and 27% identified as Asian, 4% as Black, and 66% as White. Muvalaplin resulted in placebo-adjusted reductions in lipoprotein(a) of 47.6% (95% CI, 35.1%-57.7%), 81.7% (95% CI, 78.1%-84.6%), and 85.8% (95% CI, 83.1%-88.0%) for the 10-mg/d, 60-mg/d, and 240-mg/d dosages, respectively, using an intact lipoprotein(a) assay and 40.4% (95% CI, 28.3%-50.5%), 70.0% (95% CI, 65.0%-74.2%), and 68.9% (95% CI, 63.8%-73.3%) using an apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Dose-dependent reductions in apolipoprotein B were observed at 8.9% (95% CI, -2.2% to 18.8%), 13.1% (95% CI, 4.4%-20.9%), and 16.1% (95% CI, 7.8%-23.7%) at 10 mg/d, 60 mg/d, and 240 mg/d, respectively. No change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was observed. No safety or tolerability concerns were observed at any dosage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Muvalaplin reduced lipoprotein(a) measured using intact lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a)-based assays and was well tolerated. The effect of muvalaplin on cardiovascular events requires further investigation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05563246.</p>","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574718/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142668115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of the American Medical Association
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1