Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi, Sigfried Kasper, Pedro Morgado
{"title":"Management of Depression.","authors":"Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi, Sigfried Kasper, Pedro Morgado","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.18399","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.18399","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1673-1674"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142468582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Management of Depression.","authors":"Toshi A Furukawa","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.18396","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.18396","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1674"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142468581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Management of Depression-Reply.","authors":"Gregory Simon, Nathalie Moise, David C Mohr","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.18405","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.18405","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1674-1675"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142468584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Diagnosis.","authors":"Edward John Gaudet","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.14691","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.14691","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":"332 19","pages":"1677"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142668144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fabio Silvio Taccone, Carla Rynkowski Bittencourt, Kirsten Møller, Piet Lormans, Manuel Quintana-Díaz, Anselmo Caricato, Marco Antonio Cardoso Ferreira, Rafael Badenes, Pedro Kurtz, Christian Baastrup Søndergaard, Kirsten Colpaert, Leticia Petterson, Herve Quintard, Raphael Cinotti, Elisa Gouvêa Bogossian, Cassia Righy, Serena Silva, Erik Roman-Pognuz, Catherine Vandewaeter, Daniel Lemke, Olivier Huet, Ata Mahmoodpoor, Aaron Blandino Ortiz, Mathieu van der Jagt, Russell Chabanne, Walter Videtta, Pierre Bouzat, Jean-Louis Vincent
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Blood transfusions are commonly administered to patients with acute brain injury. The optimal hemoglobin transfusion threshold is uncertain in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact on neurological outcome of 2 different hemoglobin thresholds to guide red blood cell transfusions in patients with acute brain injury.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Multicenter, phase 3, parallel-group, investigator-initiated, pragmatic, open-label randomized clinical trial conducted in 72 intensive care units across 22 countries. Eligible patients had traumatic brain injury, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, or intracerebral hemorrhage; hemoglobin values below 9 g/dL within the first 10 days after injury; and an expected intensive care unit stay of at least 72 hours. Enrollment occurred between September 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022. The last day of follow-up was June 30, 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Eight hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned to undergo a liberal (transfusion triggered by hemoglobin <9 g/dL; n = 408) or a restrictive (transfusion triggered by hemoglobin <7 g/dL; n = 442) transfusion strategy over a 28-day period.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was occurrence of an unfavorable neurological outcome, defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score between 1 and 5, at 180 days following randomization. There were 14 prespecified serious adverse events, including occurrence of cerebral ischemia after randomization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 820 patients who completed the trial (mean age, 51 years; 376 [45.9%] women), 806 had available data on the primary outcome, 393 in the liberal strategy group and 413 in the restrictive strategy group. The liberal strategy group received a median of 2 (IQR, 1-3) units of blood, and the restrictive strategy group received a median of 0 (IQR, 0-1) units of blood, with an absolute mean difference of 1.0 unit (95% CI, 0.87-1.12 units). At 180 days after randomization, 246 patients (62.6%) in the liberal strategy group had an unfavorable neurological outcome compared with 300 patients (72.6%) in the restrictive strategy group (absolute difference, -10.0% [95% CI, -16.5% to -3.6%]; adjusted relative risk, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.79-0.94]; P = .002). The effect of the transfusion thresholds on neurological outcome at 180 days was consistent across prespecified subgroups. In the liberal strategy group, 35 (8.8%) of 397 patients had at least 1 cerebral ischemic event compared with 57 (13.5%) of 423 in the restrictive strategy group (relative risk, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.44-0.97]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Patients with acute brain injury and anemia randomized to a liberal transfusion strategy were less likely to have an unfavorable neurological outcome than those randomized to a restrictive strategy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </str
{"title":"Restrictive vs Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Acute Brain Injury: The TRAIN Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Fabio Silvio Taccone, Carla Rynkowski Bittencourt, Kirsten Møller, Piet Lormans, Manuel Quintana-Díaz, Anselmo Caricato, Marco Antonio Cardoso Ferreira, Rafael Badenes, Pedro Kurtz, Christian Baastrup Søndergaard, Kirsten Colpaert, Leticia Petterson, Herve Quintard, Raphael Cinotti, Elisa Gouvêa Bogossian, Cassia Righy, Serena Silva, Erik Roman-Pognuz, Catherine Vandewaeter, Daniel Lemke, Olivier Huet, Ata Mahmoodpoor, Aaron Blandino Ortiz, Mathieu van der Jagt, Russell Chabanne, Walter Videtta, Pierre Bouzat, Jean-Louis Vincent","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.20424","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.20424","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Blood transfusions are commonly administered to patients with acute brain injury. The optimal hemoglobin transfusion threshold is uncertain in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact on neurological outcome of 2 different hemoglobin thresholds to guide red blood cell transfusions in patients with acute brain injury.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Multicenter, phase 3, parallel-group, investigator-initiated, pragmatic, open-label randomized clinical trial conducted in 72 intensive care units across 22 countries. Eligible patients had traumatic brain injury, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, or intracerebral hemorrhage; hemoglobin values below 9 g/dL within the first 10 days after injury; and an expected intensive care unit stay of at least 72 hours. Enrollment occurred between September 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022. The last day of follow-up was June 30, 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Eight hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned to undergo a liberal (transfusion triggered by hemoglobin <9 g/dL; n = 408) or a restrictive (transfusion triggered by hemoglobin <7 g/dL; n = 442) transfusion strategy over a 28-day period.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was occurrence of an unfavorable neurological outcome, defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score between 1 and 5, at 180 days following randomization. There were 14 prespecified serious adverse events, including occurrence of cerebral ischemia after randomization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 820 patients who completed the trial (mean age, 51 years; 376 [45.9%] women), 806 had available data on the primary outcome, 393 in the liberal strategy group and 413 in the restrictive strategy group. The liberal strategy group received a median of 2 (IQR, 1-3) units of blood, and the restrictive strategy group received a median of 0 (IQR, 0-1) units of blood, with an absolute mean difference of 1.0 unit (95% CI, 0.87-1.12 units). At 180 days after randomization, 246 patients (62.6%) in the liberal strategy group had an unfavorable neurological outcome compared with 300 patients (72.6%) in the restrictive strategy group (absolute difference, -10.0% [95% CI, -16.5% to -3.6%]; adjusted relative risk, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.79-0.94]; P = .002). The effect of the transfusion thresholds on neurological outcome at 180 days was consistent across prespecified subgroups. In the liberal strategy group, 35 (8.8%) of 397 patients had at least 1 cerebral ischemic event compared with 57 (13.5%) of 423 in the restrictive strategy group (relative risk, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.44-0.97]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Patients with acute brain injury and anemia randomized to a liberal transfusion strategy were less likely to have an unfavorable neurological outcome than those randomized to a restrictive strategy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </str","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1623-1633"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142391487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"JAMA.","authors":"","doi":"10.1001/jama.2023.18457","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2023.18457","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":"332 19","pages":"1595-1596"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142668138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Shifting Balance of the Risk-Benefit of Restrictive Transfusion Strategies in Neurocritically Ill Patients-Is Less Still More?","authors":"Alexis F Turgeon, François Lauzier","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.20416","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.20416","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1615-1617"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142391488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Surgery of the Heart.","authors":"","doi":"10.1001/jama.2023.18459","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2023.18459","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1678"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142502801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Steven E Nissen, Qiuqing Wang, Stephen J Nicholls, Ann Marie Navar, Kausik K Ray, Gregory G Schwartz, Michael Szarek, Erik S G Stroes, Roland Troquay, Jannick A N Dorresteijn, Henry Fok, David A Rider, Steven Romano, Kathy Wolski, Curtis Rambaran
Importance: Elevated lipoprotein(a) increases the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic stenosis.
Objective: To evaluate the effects of zerlasiran, a small-interfering RNA targeting hepatic synthesis of apolipoprotein(a), on lipoprotein(a) serum concentration.
Design, setting, and participants: A multicenter trial in patients with stable ASCVD with serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations greater than or equal to 125 nmol/L at 26 sites in Europe and South Africa between January 3, 2023, and April 27, 2023, with last follow-up on July 1, 2024.
Interventions: Participants randomized to receive a subcutaneous dose of placebo every 16 weeks for 3 doses (n = 23) or every 24 weeks for 2 doses (n = 24) or zerlasiran 450 mg every 24 weeks for 2 doses (n = 45), 300 mg every 16 weeks for 3 doses (n = 42), or 300 mg every 24 weeks for 2 doses (n = 44).
Main outcome and measures: The primary outcome was the time-averaged percent change in lipoprotein(a) concentration from baseline to 36 weeks, with follow-up to 60 weeks.
Results: Among 178 patients, mean (SD) age was 63.7 (9.4) years, 46 (25.8%) were female, with a median (IQR) baseline lipoprotein(a) concentration of 213 (177-282) nmol/L; 172 patients completed the trial. Compared with the pooled placebo group, the least-squares mean time-averaged percent change in lipoprotein(a) concentration from baseline to week 36 was -85.6% (95% CI, -90.9% to -80.3%), -82.8% (95% CI, -88.2% to -77.4%), and -81.3% (95% CI, -86.7% to -76.0%) for the 450 mg every 24 weeks, 300 mg every 16 weeks, and 300 mg every 24 weeks groups, respectively. Median (IQR) percent change in lipoprotein(a) concentration at week 36 was -94.5% (-97.3% to -84.2%) for the 450 mg every 24 weeks group, -96.4% (-97.7% to -92.3%) for the 300 mg every 16 weeks group, and -90.0% (-93.7% to -81.3%) for the 300 mg every 24 weeks group. The most common treatment-related adverse effects were injection site reactions, with mild pain occurring in 2.3% to 7.1% of participants in the first day following drug administration. There were 20 serious adverse events in 17 patients, none considered related to the study drug.
Conclusions: Zerlasiran was well-tolerated and reduced time-averaged lipoprotein(a) concentration by more than 80% during 36 weeks of treatment in patients with ASCVD.
{"title":"Zerlasiran-A Small-Interfering RNA Targeting Lipoprotein(a): A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Steven E Nissen, Qiuqing Wang, Stephen J Nicholls, Ann Marie Navar, Kausik K Ray, Gregory G Schwartz, Michael Szarek, Erik S G Stroes, Roland Troquay, Jannick A N Dorresteijn, Henry Fok, David A Rider, Steven Romano, Kathy Wolski, Curtis Rambaran","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.21957","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.21957","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Elevated lipoprotein(a) increases the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic stenosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of zerlasiran, a small-interfering RNA targeting hepatic synthesis of apolipoprotein(a), on lipoprotein(a) serum concentration.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A multicenter trial in patients with stable ASCVD with serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations greater than or equal to 125 nmol/L at 26 sites in Europe and South Africa between January 3, 2023, and April 27, 2023, with last follow-up on July 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants randomized to receive a subcutaneous dose of placebo every 16 weeks for 3 doses (n = 23) or every 24 weeks for 2 doses (n = 24) or zerlasiran 450 mg every 24 weeks for 2 doses (n = 45), 300 mg every 16 weeks for 3 doses (n = 42), or 300 mg every 24 weeks for 2 doses (n = 44).</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the time-averaged percent change in lipoprotein(a) concentration from baseline to 36 weeks, with follow-up to 60 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 178 patients, mean (SD) age was 63.7 (9.4) years, 46 (25.8%) were female, with a median (IQR) baseline lipoprotein(a) concentration of 213 (177-282) nmol/L; 172 patients completed the trial. Compared with the pooled placebo group, the least-squares mean time-averaged percent change in lipoprotein(a) concentration from baseline to week 36 was -85.6% (95% CI, -90.9% to -80.3%), -82.8% (95% CI, -88.2% to -77.4%), and -81.3% (95% CI, -86.7% to -76.0%) for the 450 mg every 24 weeks, 300 mg every 16 weeks, and 300 mg every 24 weeks groups, respectively. Median (IQR) percent change in lipoprotein(a) concentration at week 36 was -94.5% (-97.3% to -84.2%) for the 450 mg every 24 weeks group, -96.4% (-97.7% to -92.3%) for the 300 mg every 16 weeks group, and -90.0% (-93.7% to -81.3%) for the 300 mg every 24 weeks group. The most common treatment-related adverse effects were injection site reactions, with mild pain occurring in 2.3% to 7.1% of participants in the first day following drug administration. There were 20 serious adverse events in 17 patients, none considered related to the study drug.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Zerlasiran was well-tolerated and reduced time-averaged lipoprotein(a) concentration by more than 80% during 36 weeks of treatment in patients with ASCVD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05537571.</p>","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574722/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142668118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Stephen J Nicholls, Wei Ni, Grace M Rhodes, Steven E Nissen, Ann Marie Navar, Laura F Michael, Axel Haupt, John H Krege
Importance: Muvalaplin inhibits lipoprotein(a) formation. A 14-day phase 1 study demonstrated that muvalaplin was well tolerated and reduced lipoprotein(a) levels up to 65%. The effect of longer administration of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels in individuals at high cardiovascular risk remains uncertain.
Objectives: To determine the effect of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels and to assess safety and tolerability.
Design, setting, and participants: Phase 2, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial enrolling 233 participants with lipoprotein(a) concentrations of 175 nmol/L or greater with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or familial hypercholesterolemia at 43 sites in Asia, Europe, Australia, Brazil, and the United States between December 10, 2022, and November 22, 2023.
Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive orally administered muvalaplin at dosages of 10 mg/d (n = 34), 60 mg/d (n = 64), or 240 mg/d (n = 68) or placebo (n = 67) for 12 weeks.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was the placebo-adjusted percentage change from baseline in lipoprotein(a) molar concentration at week 12, using an assay to measure intact lipoprotein(a) and a traditional apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Secondary end points included the percentage change in apolipoprotein B and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
Results: The median age of study participants was 66 years; 33% were female; and 27% identified as Asian, 4% as Black, and 66% as White. Muvalaplin resulted in placebo-adjusted reductions in lipoprotein(a) of 47.6% (95% CI, 35.1%-57.7%), 81.7% (95% CI, 78.1%-84.6%), and 85.8% (95% CI, 83.1%-88.0%) for the 10-mg/d, 60-mg/d, and 240-mg/d dosages, respectively, using an intact lipoprotein(a) assay and 40.4% (95% CI, 28.3%-50.5%), 70.0% (95% CI, 65.0%-74.2%), and 68.9% (95% CI, 63.8%-73.3%) using an apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Dose-dependent reductions in apolipoprotein B were observed at 8.9% (95% CI, -2.2% to 18.8%), 13.1% (95% CI, 4.4%-20.9%), and 16.1% (95% CI, 7.8%-23.7%) at 10 mg/d, 60 mg/d, and 240 mg/d, respectively. No change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was observed. No safety or tolerability concerns were observed at any dosage.
Conclusions and relevance: Muvalaplin reduced lipoprotein(a) measured using intact lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a)-based assays and was well tolerated. The effect of muvalaplin on cardiovascular events requires further investigation.
{"title":"Oral Muvalaplin for Lowering of Lipoprotein(a): A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Stephen J Nicholls, Wei Ni, Grace M Rhodes, Steven E Nissen, Ann Marie Navar, Laura F Michael, Axel Haupt, John H Krege","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.24017","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.24017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Muvalaplin inhibits lipoprotein(a) formation. A 14-day phase 1 study demonstrated that muvalaplin was well tolerated and reduced lipoprotein(a) levels up to 65%. The effect of longer administration of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels in individuals at high cardiovascular risk remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the effect of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels and to assess safety and tolerability.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Phase 2, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial enrolling 233 participants with lipoprotein(a) concentrations of 175 nmol/L or greater with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or familial hypercholesterolemia at 43 sites in Asia, Europe, Australia, Brazil, and the United States between December 10, 2022, and November 22, 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomized to receive orally administered muvalaplin at dosages of 10 mg/d (n = 34), 60 mg/d (n = 64), or 240 mg/d (n = 68) or placebo (n = 67) for 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end point was the placebo-adjusted percentage change from baseline in lipoprotein(a) molar concentration at week 12, using an assay to measure intact lipoprotein(a) and a traditional apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Secondary end points included the percentage change in apolipoprotein B and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of study participants was 66 years; 33% were female; and 27% identified as Asian, 4% as Black, and 66% as White. Muvalaplin resulted in placebo-adjusted reductions in lipoprotein(a) of 47.6% (95% CI, 35.1%-57.7%), 81.7% (95% CI, 78.1%-84.6%), and 85.8% (95% CI, 83.1%-88.0%) for the 10-mg/d, 60-mg/d, and 240-mg/d dosages, respectively, using an intact lipoprotein(a) assay and 40.4% (95% CI, 28.3%-50.5%), 70.0% (95% CI, 65.0%-74.2%), and 68.9% (95% CI, 63.8%-73.3%) using an apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Dose-dependent reductions in apolipoprotein B were observed at 8.9% (95% CI, -2.2% to 18.8%), 13.1% (95% CI, 4.4%-20.9%), and 16.1% (95% CI, 7.8%-23.7%) at 10 mg/d, 60 mg/d, and 240 mg/d, respectively. No change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was observed. No safety or tolerability concerns were observed at any dosage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Muvalaplin reduced lipoprotein(a) measured using intact lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a)-based assays and was well tolerated. The effect of muvalaplin on cardiovascular events requires further investigation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05563246.</p>","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574718/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142668115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}