首页 > 最新文献

Journal of the American Medical Association最新文献

英文 中文
Internet Use May Boost Mental Health Benefits in Older Adults. 使用互联网对老年人的心理健康有益。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.25506
Samantha Anderer
{"title":"Internet Use May Boost Mental Health Benefits in Older Adults.","authors":"Samantha Anderer","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.25506","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.25506","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142864698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
US Life Expectancy Gap Among Demographics Was Up to 20 Years in 2021. 2021年,美国人口预期寿命差距高达20岁。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.25502
Samantha Anderer
{"title":"US Life Expectancy Gap Among Demographics Was Up to 20 Years in 2021.","authors":"Samantha Anderer","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.25502","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.25502","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142864700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fatigue in Air Traffic Operations-Opportunities to Enhance Safety. 空中交通运行中的疲劳--加强安全的机会。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.21057
Mark R Rosekind, Erin E Flynn-Evans, Charles A Czeisler
{"title":"Fatigue in Air Traffic Operations-Opportunities to Enhance Safety.","authors":"Mark R Rosekind, Erin E Flynn-Evans, Charles A Czeisler","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.21057","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.21057","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"197-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142502790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cardiovascular Disease Deaths Climb in Rural US, Particularly Among Younger Adults. 美国农村心血管疾病死亡人数攀升,尤其是年轻人。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.25507
Samantha Anderer
{"title":"Cardiovascular Disease Deaths Climb in Rural US, Particularly Among Younger Adults.","authors":"Samantha Anderer","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.25507","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.25507","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142864691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Women's Immune Systems May Explain Increased Long COVID Diagnoses. 女性的免疫系统可能解释了长时间的COVID诊断。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.25505
Samantha Anderer
{"title":"Women's Immune Systems May Explain Increased Long COVID Diagnoses.","authors":"Samantha Anderer","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.25505","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.25505","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"194-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142864702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Accidental Teacher-Direct-Care Physicians Increasingly Placed in Teaching Roles. 意外的教师--越来越多的直接护理医生被赋予教学角色。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.17626
Joseph R Sweigart, Rebecca Watson, Alfred Burger
{"title":"The Accidental Teacher-Direct-Care Physicians Increasingly Placed in Teaching Roles.","authors":"Joseph R Sweigart, Rebecca Watson, Alfred Burger","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.17626","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.17626","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"203-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142568988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Oral Muvalaplin for Lowering of Lipoprotein(a): A Randomized Clinical Trial. 降低脂蛋白(a)的口服 Muvalaplin:随机临床试验
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.24017
Stephen J Nicholls, Wei Ni, Grace M Rhodes, Steven E Nissen, Ann Marie Navar, Laura F Michael, Axel Haupt, John H Krege

Importance: Muvalaplin inhibits lipoprotein(a) formation. A 14-day phase 1 study demonstrated that muvalaplin was well tolerated and reduced lipoprotein(a) levels up to 65%. The effect of longer administration of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels in individuals at high cardiovascular risk remains uncertain.

Objectives: To determine the effect of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels and to assess safety and tolerability.

Design, setting, and participants: Phase 2, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial enrolling 233 participants with lipoprotein(a) concentrations of 175 nmol/L or greater with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or familial hypercholesterolemia at 43 sites in Asia, Europe, Australia, Brazil, and the United States between December 10, 2022, and November 22, 2023.

Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive orally administered muvalaplin at dosages of 10 mg/d (n = 34), 60 mg/d (n = 64), or 240 mg/d (n = 68) or placebo (n = 67) for 12 weeks.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was the placebo-adjusted percentage change from baseline in lipoprotein(a) molar concentration at week 12, using an assay to measure intact lipoprotein(a) and a traditional apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Secondary end points included the percentage change in apolipoprotein B and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Results: The median age of study participants was 66 years; 33% were female; and 27% identified as Asian, 4% as Black, and 66% as White. Muvalaplin resulted in placebo-adjusted reductions in lipoprotein(a) of 47.6% (95% CI, 35.1%-57.7%), 81.7% (95% CI, 78.1%-84.6%), and 85.8% (95% CI, 83.1%-88.0%) for the 10-mg/d, 60-mg/d, and 240-mg/d dosages, respectively, using an intact lipoprotein(a) assay and 40.4% (95% CI, 28.3%-50.5%), 70.0% (95% CI, 65.0%-74.2%), and 68.9% (95% CI, 63.8%-73.3%) using an apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Dose-dependent reductions in apolipoprotein B were observed at 8.9% (95% CI, -2.2% to 18.8%), 13.1% (95% CI, 4.4%-20.9%), and 16.1% (95% CI, 7.8%-23.7%) at 10 mg/d, 60 mg/d, and 240 mg/d, respectively. No change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was observed. No safety or tolerability concerns were observed at any dosage.

Conclusions and relevance: Muvalaplin reduced lipoprotein(a) measured using intact lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a)-based assays and was well tolerated. The effect of muvalaplin on cardiovascular events requires further investigation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05563246.

重要性:Muvalaplin 可抑制脂蛋白(a)的形成。一项为期 14 天的 1 期研究表明,muvalaplin 的耐受性良好,可降低脂蛋白(a)水平达 65%。对于心血管风险较高的人群,长期服用muvalaplin对脂蛋白(a)水平的影响仍不确定:确定muvalaplin对脂蛋白(a)水平的影响,并评估其安全性和耐受性:2期、安慰剂对照、随机、双盲试验,于2022年12月10日至2023年11月22日期间在亚洲、欧洲、澳大利亚、巴西和美国的43个地点招募233名脂蛋白(a)浓度大于或等于175 nmol/L、患有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病、糖尿病或家族性高胆固醇血症的参与者:参与者随机接受口服muvalaplin,剂量为10毫克/天(n = 34)、60毫克/天(n = 64)或240毫克/天(n = 68)或安慰剂(n = 67),为期12周:主要终点是第12周时经安慰剂调整后的脂蛋白(a)摩尔浓度与基线相比的百分比变化,采用的测定方法是完整脂蛋白(a)测定法和传统的基于载脂蛋白(a)的测定法。次要终点包括载脂蛋白B和高敏C反应蛋白的百分比变化:研究参与者的中位年龄为 66 岁,33% 为女性,27% 为亚洲人,4% 为黑人,66% 为白人。经安慰剂调整后,服用 10 毫克/天的 Muvalaplin 可使脂蛋白(a)降低 47.6%(95% CI,35.1%-57.7%)、81.7%(95% CI,78.1%-84.6%)和 85.8%(95% CI,83.1%-88.0%)。使用基于脂蛋白(a)的检测方法,10 毫克/天、60 毫克/天和 240 毫克/天剂量的降低率分别为 40.4%(95% CI,28.3%-50.5%)、70.0%(95% CI,65.0%-74.2%)和 68.9%(95% CI,63.8%-73.3%)。在 10 毫克/天、60 毫克/天和 240 毫克/天时,脂蛋白 B 的剂量依赖性降低分别为 8.9%(95% CI,-2.2%-18.8%)、13.1%(95% CI,4.4%-20.9%)和 16.1%(95% CI,7.8%-23.7%)。未观察到高敏C反应蛋白的变化。在任何剂量下均未观察到安全性或耐受性问题:使用完整脂蛋白(a)和基于载脂蛋白(a)的检测方法测量脂蛋白(a)时,木伐拉普林可降低脂蛋白(a),且耐受性良好。muvalaplin对心血管事件的影响还需进一步研究:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT05563246。
{"title":"Oral Muvalaplin for Lowering of Lipoprotein(a): A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Stephen J Nicholls, Wei Ni, Grace M Rhodes, Steven E Nissen, Ann Marie Navar, Laura F Michael, Axel Haupt, John H Krege","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.24017","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.24017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Muvalaplin inhibits lipoprotein(a) formation. A 14-day phase 1 study demonstrated that muvalaplin was well tolerated and reduced lipoprotein(a) levels up to 65%. The effect of longer administration of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels in individuals at high cardiovascular risk remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the effect of muvalaplin on lipoprotein(a) levels and to assess safety and tolerability.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Phase 2, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial enrolling 233 participants with lipoprotein(a) concentrations of 175 nmol/L or greater with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or familial hypercholesterolemia at 43 sites in Asia, Europe, Australia, Brazil, and the United States between December 10, 2022, and November 22, 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomized to receive orally administered muvalaplin at dosages of 10 mg/d (n = 34), 60 mg/d (n = 64), or 240 mg/d (n = 68) or placebo (n = 67) for 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end point was the placebo-adjusted percentage change from baseline in lipoprotein(a) molar concentration at week 12, using an assay to measure intact lipoprotein(a) and a traditional apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Secondary end points included the percentage change in apolipoprotein B and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of study participants was 66 years; 33% were female; and 27% identified as Asian, 4% as Black, and 66% as White. Muvalaplin resulted in placebo-adjusted reductions in lipoprotein(a) of 47.6% (95% CI, 35.1%-57.7%), 81.7% (95% CI, 78.1%-84.6%), and 85.8% (95% CI, 83.1%-88.0%) for the 10-mg/d, 60-mg/d, and 240-mg/d dosages, respectively, using an intact lipoprotein(a) assay and 40.4% (95% CI, 28.3%-50.5%), 70.0% (95% CI, 65.0%-74.2%), and 68.9% (95% CI, 63.8%-73.3%) using an apolipoprotein(a)-based assay. Dose-dependent reductions in apolipoprotein B were observed at 8.9% (95% CI, -2.2% to 18.8%), 13.1% (95% CI, 4.4%-20.9%), and 16.1% (95% CI, 7.8%-23.7%) at 10 mg/d, 60 mg/d, and 240 mg/d, respectively. No change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was observed. No safety or tolerability concerns were observed at any dosage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Muvalaplin reduced lipoprotein(a) measured using intact lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a)-based assays and was well tolerated. The effect of muvalaplin on cardiovascular events requires further investigation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05563246.</p>","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"222-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574718/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142668115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hospital Assets and Private Equity Acquisition. 医院资产和私募股权收购。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.23421
Shaun Larkin
{"title":"Hospital Assets and Private Equity Acquisition.","authors":"Shaun Larkin","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.23421","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.23421","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142877439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Addressing Health Care's Administrative Cost Crisis. 解决医疗保健的行政成本危机。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.27670
Brooke Istvan, Kevin A Schulman, Stefanos Zenios
{"title":"Addressing Health Care's Administrative Cost Crisis.","authors":"Brooke Istvan, Kevin A Schulman, Stefanos Zenios","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.27670","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.27670","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142983968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Palliative Care Initiated in the Emergency Department: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. 在急诊科开展姑息治疗:一项随机临床试验。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.23696
Corita R Grudzen, Nina Siman, Allison M Cuthel, Oluwaseun Adeyemi, Rebecca Liddicoat Yamarik, Keith S Goldfeld, Benjamin S Abella, Fernanda Bellolio, Sorayah Bourenane, Abraham A Brody, Lauren Cameron-Comasco, Joshua Chodosh, Julie J Cooper, Ashley L Deutsch, Marie Carmelle Elie, Ahmed Elsayem, Rosemarie Fernandez, Jessica Fleischer-Black, Mauren Gang, Nicholas Genes, Rebecca Goett, Heather Heaton, Jacob Hill, Leora Horwitz, Eric Isaacs, Karen Jubanyik, Sangeeta Lamba, Katharine Lawrence, Michelle Lin, Caitlin Loprinzi-Brauer, Troy Madsen, Joseph Miller, Ada Modrek, Ronny Otero, Kei Ouchi, Christopher Richardson, Lynne D Richardson, Matthew Ryan, Elizabeth Schoenfeld, Matthew Shaw, Ashley Shreves, Lauren T Southerland, Audrey Tan, Julie Uspal, Arvind Venkat, Laura Walker, Ian Wittman, Erin Zimny
<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The emergency department (ED) offers an opportunity to initiate palliative care for older adults with serious, life-limiting illness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effect of a multicomponent intervention to initiate palliative care in the ED on hospital admission, subsequent health care use, and survival in older adults with serious, life-limiting illness.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Cluster randomized, stepped-wedge, clinical trial including patients aged 66 years or older who visited 1 of 29 EDs across the US between May 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, had 12 months of prior Medicare enrollment, and a Gagne comorbidity score greater than 6, representing a risk of short-term mortality greater than 30%. Nursing home patients were excluded.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A multicomponent intervention (the Primary Palliative Care for Emergency Medicine intervention) included (1) evidence-based multidisciplinary education; (2) simulation-based workshops on serious illness communication; (3) clinical decision support; and (4) audit and feedback for ED clinical staff.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was hospital admission. The secondary outcomes included subsequent health care use and survival at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 98 922 initial ED visits during the study period (median age, 77 years [IQR, 71-84 years]; 50% were female; 13% were Black and 78% were White; and the median Gagne comorbidity score was 8 [IQR, 7-10]). The rate of hospital admission was 64.4% during the preintervention period vs 61.3% during the postintervention period (absolute difference, -3.1% [95% CI, -3.7% to -2.5%]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.03 [95% CI, 0.93 to 1.14]). There was no difference in the secondary outcomes before vs after the intervention. The rate of admission to an intensive care unit was 7.8% during the preintervention period vs 6.7% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.15]). The rate of at least 1 revisit to the ED was 34.2% during the preintervention period vs 32.2% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.91 to 1.09]). The rate of hospice use was 17.7% during the preintervention period vs 17.2% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.93 to 1.16]). The rate of home health use was 42.0% during the preintervention period vs 38.1% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.10]). The rate of at least 1 hospital readmission was 41.0% during the preintervention period vs 36.6% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.10]). The rate of death was 28.1% during the preintervention period vs 28.7% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.98 to 1.18]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This multicomponent intervention to initiate palliativ
重要性:急诊科(ED)提供了一个机会,启动姑息治疗的老年人严重,限制生命的疾病。目的:评估在急诊科启动姑息治疗的多组分干预对患有严重、限制生命的疾病的老年人住院、随后的医疗保健使用和生存率的影响。设计、环境和参与者:集群随机、楔形分步临床试验,包括在2018年5月1日至2022年12月31日期间访问美国29个急诊科中1个急诊科的66岁或以上患者,既往有12个月的医疗保险登记,Gagne合并症评分大于6,短期死亡风险大于30%。养老院的病人被排除在外。干预:多组分干预(初级姑息治疗急诊医学干预)包括(1)循证多学科教育;(2)基于模拟的大病传播研讨会;(3)临床决策支持;(4)对急诊科临床工作人员进行审核和反馈。主要转归指标:主要转归指标为住院率。次要结局包括随后的医疗保健使用情况和6个月的生存率。结果:研究期间有98次 922次ED首次就诊(中位年龄77岁[IQR, 71-84岁];50%为女性;13%是黑人,78%是白人;加涅合并症评分中位数为8分[IQR, 7-10])。干预前的住院率为64.4%,干预后为61.3%(绝对差值为-3.1% [95% CI, -3.7%至-2.5%];校正优势比[OR], 1.03 [95% CI, 0.93 ~ 1.14])。干预前和干预后的次要结局没有差异。干预前重症监护病房的入院率为7.8%,干预后为6.7%(校正OR为0.98 [95% CI, 0.83至1.15])。干预前至少1次复查ED的比率为34.2%,干预后为32.2%(校正OR为1.00 [95% CI, 0.91至1.09])。干预前的安宁疗护使用率为17.7%,干预后为17.2%(校正OR为1.04 [95% CI, 0.93至1.16])。干预前家庭健康使用率为42.0%,干预后为38.1%(调整比值比为1.01 [95% CI, 0.92至1.10])。干预前至少1次再入院率为41.0%,干预后为36.6%(校正OR为1.01 [95% CI, 0.92 ~ 1.10])。干预前死亡率为28.1%,干预后死亡率为28.7%(校正OR为1.07 [95% CI, 0.98 ~ 1.18])。结论和相关性:这种在急诊科启动姑息治疗的多组分干预对患有严重、限制生命的疾病的老年人的住院率、随后的医疗保健使用或短期死亡率没有影响。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03424109。
{"title":"Palliative Care Initiated in the Emergency Department: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Corita R Grudzen, Nina Siman, Allison M Cuthel, Oluwaseun Adeyemi, Rebecca Liddicoat Yamarik, Keith S Goldfeld, Benjamin S Abella, Fernanda Bellolio, Sorayah Bourenane, Abraham A Brody, Lauren Cameron-Comasco, Joshua Chodosh, Julie J Cooper, Ashley L Deutsch, Marie Carmelle Elie, Ahmed Elsayem, Rosemarie Fernandez, Jessica Fleischer-Black, Mauren Gang, Nicholas Genes, Rebecca Goett, Heather Heaton, Jacob Hill, Leora Horwitz, Eric Isaacs, Karen Jubanyik, Sangeeta Lamba, Katharine Lawrence, Michelle Lin, Caitlin Loprinzi-Brauer, Troy Madsen, Joseph Miller, Ada Modrek, Ronny Otero, Kei Ouchi, Christopher Richardson, Lynne D Richardson, Matthew Ryan, Elizabeth Schoenfeld, Matthew Shaw, Ashley Shreves, Lauren T Southerland, Audrey Tan, Julie Uspal, Arvind Venkat, Laura Walker, Ian Wittman, Erin Zimny","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.23696","DOIUrl":"10.1001/jama.2024.23696","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Importance: &lt;/strong&gt;The emergency department (ED) offers an opportunity to initiate palliative care for older adults with serious, life-limiting illness.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To assess the effect of a multicomponent intervention to initiate palliative care in the ED on hospital admission, subsequent health care use, and survival in older adults with serious, life-limiting illness.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design, setting, and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;Cluster randomized, stepped-wedge, clinical trial including patients aged 66 years or older who visited 1 of 29 EDs across the US between May 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, had 12 months of prior Medicare enrollment, and a Gagne comorbidity score greater than 6, representing a risk of short-term mortality greater than 30%. Nursing home patients were excluded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Intervention: &lt;/strong&gt;A multicomponent intervention (the Primary Palliative Care for Emergency Medicine intervention) included (1) evidence-based multidisciplinary education; (2) simulation-based workshops on serious illness communication; (3) clinical decision support; and (4) audit and feedback for ED clinical staff.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcome and measures: &lt;/strong&gt;The primary outcome was hospital admission. The secondary outcomes included subsequent health care use and survival at 6 months.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;There were 98 922 initial ED visits during the study period (median age, 77 years [IQR, 71-84 years]; 50% were female; 13% were Black and 78% were White; and the median Gagne comorbidity score was 8 [IQR, 7-10]). The rate of hospital admission was 64.4% during the preintervention period vs 61.3% during the postintervention period (absolute difference, -3.1% [95% CI, -3.7% to -2.5%]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.03 [95% CI, 0.93 to 1.14]). There was no difference in the secondary outcomes before vs after the intervention. The rate of admission to an intensive care unit was 7.8% during the preintervention period vs 6.7% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.15]). The rate of at least 1 revisit to the ED was 34.2% during the preintervention period vs 32.2% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.91 to 1.09]). The rate of hospice use was 17.7% during the preintervention period vs 17.2% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.93 to 1.16]). The rate of home health use was 42.0% during the preintervention period vs 38.1% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.10]). The rate of at least 1 hospital readmission was 41.0% during the preintervention period vs 36.6% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.10]). The rate of death was 28.1% during the preintervention period vs 28.7% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.98 to 1.18]).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions and relevance: &lt;/strong&gt;This multicomponent intervention to initiate palliativ","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142983972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of the American Medical Association
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1