Pub Date : 2025-01-20DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004533
Anthony di Natale, Gary W Nace, Michael L Nance
{"title":"Reply letter to \"Whether sternum fractures increase the injury severity in patients with thoracic vertebral fracture needs further evaluation\".","authors":"Anthony di Natale, Gary W Nace, Michael L Nance","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004533","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004533","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-20DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004544
Bardiya Zangbar, Aryan Rafieezadeh, Kartik Prabhakaran, Anna Jose, Ilya Shnaydman, Matthew Bronstein, Joshua Klein, Gabriel Froula, Jordan Kirsch
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a critical intervention in the management of patients with trauma-induced cardiorespiratory failure. This study aims to compare outcomes in patients with severe thoracic injuries with and without venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO).
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2021) and included all patients with isolated blunt thoracic injuries with Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥4 who required intubation. Patients were divided into two groups based on VV-ECMO and were compared using propensity score matching with the primary outcome of mortality.
Results: A total of 14,106 patients with severe thoracic injuries were identified. Propensity score matching resulted in two groups of 812 VV-ECMO and 812 non-VV-ECMO groups. Venovenous ECMO group had significantly lower in-hospital mortality rates (22.3% vs. 37.3%, p < 0.001). However, VV-ECMO group had significantly higher rates of complications including cardiac arrest (27.7% vs. 10.6%), pulmonary embolism (7.6% vs. 2.1%), ventilator-associated pneumonia (16.7% vs. 4.2%), unplanned intubation (11.9% vs. 8.5%), unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission (8.4% vs. 4.9%), and unplanned return to operation room (10.1% vs. 2.6%) (p < 0.001, for all). Patients in VV-ECMO group had significantly higher hospital (29.46 ± 26.37 vs. 13.59 ± 13.3 days) and ICU (22.96 ± 19.38 vs. 9.38 ± 9.05 days) length of stay (p < 0.001, for both). In VV-ECMO group, the mean ± SD time to perform VV-ECMO was 5.54 ± 5.91 days. Each day earlier initiation of VV-ECMO resulted in decreased hospital and ICU length of stay by 67.1% and 59.9%, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). Among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (n = 435 in each group after repeated PS matching), we observed significantly lower mortality rates in VV-ECMO group (26.9% vs. 40%, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: While VV-ECMO in isolated blunt thoracic trauma patients is associated with higher survival rates even in non-acute respiratory distress syndrome cases, it is associated with higher incidence of complications. These findings emphasize earlier consideration of VV-ECMO in severe blunt thoracic trauma.
Level of evidence: Retrospective Study; Level III.
背景:体外膜氧合(ECMO)已成为创伤性心肺衰竭患者管理的关键干预措施。本研究的目的是比较重症胸外伤患者采用和不采用静脉-静脉体外膜氧合(VV-ECMO)治疗的结果。方法:我们进行了一项创伤质量改善计划(2017-2021)的回顾性队列研究,纳入了所有需要插管的单纯钝性胸部损伤患者,其简略损伤量表评分≥4分。根据VV-ECMO将患者分为两组,并使用倾向评分与死亡率的主要结局相匹配进行比较。结果:共鉴定出14106例重型胸外伤患者。倾向评分匹配结果为812例VV-ECMO组和812例非VV-ECMO组。静脉-静脉ECMO组住院死亡率显著降低(22.3% vs. 37.3%, p < 0.001)。然而,VV-ECMO组的并发症发生率明显更高,包括心脏骤停(27.7%比10.6%)、肺栓塞(7.6%比2.1%)、呼吸机相关性肺炎(16.7%比4.2%)、计划外插管(11.9%比8.5%)、计划外重症监护病房(ICU)入院(8.4%比4.9%)和计划外返回手术室(10.1%比2.6%)(均p < 0.001)。VV-ECMO组患者住院时间(29.46±26.37天比13.59±13.3天)和ICU住院时间(22.96±19.38天比9.38±9.05天)均显著高于对照组(p < 0.001)。VV-ECMO组VV-ECMO的平均±SD时间为5.54±5.91天。每提前一天开始VV-ECMO,住院时间和ICU住院时间分别减少67.1%和59.9% (p < 0.001)。在无急性呼吸窘迫综合征的患者中(重复PS匹配后每组n = 435例),我们观察到VV-ECMO组的死亡率显著降低(26.9% vs. 40%, p < 0.001)。结论:孤立性钝性胸外伤患者的VV-ECMO即使在非急性呼吸窘迫综合征病例中也具有较高的生存率,但其并发症发生率较高。这些发现强调了在严重钝性胸外伤中早期考虑VV-ECMO。证据水平:回顾性研究;第三层次。
{"title":"Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is associated with decreased mortality in non-acute respiratory distress syndrome patients following severe blunt thoracic trauma.","authors":"Bardiya Zangbar, Aryan Rafieezadeh, Kartik Prabhakaran, Anna Jose, Ilya Shnaydman, Matthew Bronstein, Joshua Klein, Gabriel Froula, Jordan Kirsch","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004544","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004544","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a critical intervention in the management of patients with trauma-induced cardiorespiratory failure. This study aims to compare outcomes in patients with severe thoracic injuries with and without venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study on Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2021) and included all patients with isolated blunt thoracic injuries with Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥4 who required intubation. Patients were divided into two groups based on VV-ECMO and were compared using propensity score matching with the primary outcome of mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14,106 patients with severe thoracic injuries were identified. Propensity score matching resulted in two groups of 812 VV-ECMO and 812 non-VV-ECMO groups. Venovenous ECMO group had significantly lower in-hospital mortality rates (22.3% vs. 37.3%, p < 0.001). However, VV-ECMO group had significantly higher rates of complications including cardiac arrest (27.7% vs. 10.6%), pulmonary embolism (7.6% vs. 2.1%), ventilator-associated pneumonia (16.7% vs. 4.2%), unplanned intubation (11.9% vs. 8.5%), unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission (8.4% vs. 4.9%), and unplanned return to operation room (10.1% vs. 2.6%) (p < 0.001, for all). Patients in VV-ECMO group had significantly higher hospital (29.46 ± 26.37 vs. 13.59 ± 13.3 days) and ICU (22.96 ± 19.38 vs. 9.38 ± 9.05 days) length of stay (p < 0.001, for both). In VV-ECMO group, the mean ± SD time to perform VV-ECMO was 5.54 ± 5.91 days. Each day earlier initiation of VV-ECMO resulted in decreased hospital and ICU length of stay by 67.1% and 59.9%, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). Among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (n = 435 in each group after repeated PS matching), we observed significantly lower mortality rates in VV-ECMO group (26.9% vs. 40%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While VV-ECMO in isolated blunt thoracic trauma patients is associated with higher survival rates even in non-acute respiratory distress syndrome cases, it is associated with higher incidence of complications. These findings emphasize earlier consideration of VV-ECMO in severe blunt thoracic trauma.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Retrospective Study; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-20DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004566
Tabitha Garwe, Zakhary L Bishoy
Abstract: Observational studies assessing causal effects of interventions are subject to indication (selection) bias, which may be difficult to eliminate using traditional multivariable techniques. When properly specified, propensity score-adjusted analysis may offer an advantage traditional regression by ensuring that investigators explicitly assess comparability of baseline prognostic factors between the treated and untreated. However, it is important to note that the effectiveness of a propensity score-adjusted analysis depends on the variables selected for the model and the analytic approach. Noninclusion of important prognostic factors and model misspecification among other errors may in fact increase bias; thus, in performing propensity score analysis, these errors must be minimized as much as possible or assessed using sensitivity analysis to ensure validity.
{"title":"An introduction to propensity score analysis in acute care surgery research: Methodology and pitfalls.","authors":"Tabitha Garwe, Zakhary L Bishoy","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004566","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004566","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Observational studies assessing causal effects of interventions are subject to indication (selection) bias, which may be difficult to eliminate using traditional multivariable techniques. When properly specified, propensity score-adjusted analysis may offer an advantage traditional regression by ensuring that investigators explicitly assess comparability of baseline prognostic factors between the treated and untreated. However, it is important to note that the effectiveness of a propensity score-adjusted analysis depends on the variables selected for the model and the analytic approach. Noninclusion of important prognostic factors and model misspecification among other errors may in fact increase bias; thus, in performing propensity score analysis, these errors must be minimized as much as possible or assessed using sensitivity analysis to ensure validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-17DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004526
Elizabeth R Maginot, Hunter B Moore, Ernest E Moore, Isabella M Bernhardt, Trace B Moody, Collin M White, Halima Siddiqui, Flobater I Gawargi, Reynold Henry, James G Chandler, Angela Sauaia, Christopher D Barrett
Background: Tissue-plasminogen activator-challenged thromboelastography (tPA-TEG) predicts massive transfusion and mortality better than conventional rapid thromboelastography (rTEG), with little concordance between their lysis values (LY30). We hypothesized that the main fibrinolytic inhibitors plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and α-2 antiplasmin (A2AP), as well as markers of fibrinolytic activation (plasmin-antiplasmin [PAP], tPA-PAI-1 complex, tPA activity), would correlate more strongly with tPA-TEG versus rTEG LY30 and may explain the recent findings of four distinct fibrinolytic phenotypes in trauma based on these two TEG methodologies.
Methods: Adult trauma patients (n = 56) had tPA-TEG, rTEG, and plasma obtained on arrival to the emergency department with institutional review board approval. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 activity, A2AP, PAP, and tPA-PAI-1 complex as well as tPA activity were measured. Data were analyzed using Spearman's correlations and analysis of variance.
Results: The median age was 34 years, 75% were male, and the New Injury Severity Score was 14. Mortality was 25%, and 23% required a massive transfusion. There was a significant negative correlation between PAI-1 activity and A2AP with tPA-TEG LY30 (r = -0.77, p < 0.0001 and r = -0.62, p < 0.0001). There was a significant positive correlation between PAP complex and tPA-TEG LY30 (r = 0.74, p < 0.0001). There was no correlation between any fibrinolytic analyte and rTEG LY30. When stratified by phenotype, patients with hypofibrinolysis and nonpathologic fibrinolysis had higher active PAI-1 (p < 0.05) and A2AP levels (p < 0.05), lower PAP (p < 0.05), and tPA-PAI-1 complex (p < 0.05). Tissue-plasminogen activator activity was higher in hyperfibrinolysis relative to the other three groups (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Tissue-plasminogen activator-TEG LY30 more accurately reflects fibrinolysis phenotypes in trauma patients than conventional TEG methods. This provides an explanation for tPA-TEG's superior performance over rTEG in predicting clinical outcomes.
Level of evidence: Basic Science; N/A.
背景:组织纤溶酶原激活物激发的血栓弹性成像(tPA-TEG)比传统的快速血栓弹性成像(rTEG)更能预测大量输血和死亡率,两者的溶解值(LY30)几乎没有一致性。我们假设主要的纤溶酶抑制剂纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂-1 (PAI-1)和α-2抗纤溶酶(A2AP),以及纤溶酶激活标志物(纤溶酶抗纤溶酶[PAP], tPA-PAI-1复合物,tPA活性)与tPA-TEG和rTEG LY30的相关性更强,并且可以解释最近基于这两种TEG方法在创伤中发现的四种不同的纤溶表型。方法:56例成人外伤患者经机构审查委员会批准,在到达急诊科时进行tPA-TEG、rTEG和血浆检测。测定纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂-1活性、A2AP、PAP、tPA- pai -1复合物及tPA活性。数据分析采用Spearman相关和方差分析。结果:中位年龄34岁,男性占75%,新损伤严重程度评分为14分。死亡率为25%,23%的人需要大量输血。PAI-1活性、A2AP与tPA-TEG LY30呈显著负相关(r = -0.77, p < 0.0001; r = -0.62, p < 0.0001)。PAP复合物与tPA-TEG LY30呈显著正相关(r = 0.74, p < 0.0001)。任何纤溶分析物与rTEG LY30均无相关性。当按表型分层时,低纤溶和非病理性纤溶患者活性PAI-1和A2AP水平较高(p < 0.05), PAP水平较低(p < 0.05), tPA-PAI-1复合物水平较低(p < 0.05)。高纤溶组组织纤溶酶原激活物活性高于其他3组(p < 0.05)。结论:组织-纤溶酶原激活物-TEG LY30比常规TEG方法更准确地反映创伤患者的纤溶表型。这就解释了tPA-TEG在预测临床结果方面优于rTEG的原因。证据水平:基础科学;N/A。
{"title":"The tissue-plasminogen activator-challenged thromboelastography provides a comprehensive assessment of fibrinolysis in the severely injured.","authors":"Elizabeth R Maginot, Hunter B Moore, Ernest E Moore, Isabella M Bernhardt, Trace B Moody, Collin M White, Halima Siddiqui, Flobater I Gawargi, Reynold Henry, James G Chandler, Angela Sauaia, Christopher D Barrett","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004526","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004526","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tissue-plasminogen activator-challenged thromboelastography (tPA-TEG) predicts massive transfusion and mortality better than conventional rapid thromboelastography (rTEG), with little concordance between their lysis values (LY30). We hypothesized that the main fibrinolytic inhibitors plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and α-2 antiplasmin (A2AP), as well as markers of fibrinolytic activation (plasmin-antiplasmin [PAP], tPA-PAI-1 complex, tPA activity), would correlate more strongly with tPA-TEG versus rTEG LY30 and may explain the recent findings of four distinct fibrinolytic phenotypes in trauma based on these two TEG methodologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult trauma patients (n = 56) had tPA-TEG, rTEG, and plasma obtained on arrival to the emergency department with institutional review board approval. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 activity, A2AP, PAP, and tPA-PAI-1 complex as well as tPA activity were measured. Data were analyzed using Spearman's correlations and analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 34 years, 75% were male, and the New Injury Severity Score was 14. Mortality was 25%, and 23% required a massive transfusion. There was a significant negative correlation between PAI-1 activity and A2AP with tPA-TEG LY30 (r = -0.77, p < 0.0001 and r = -0.62, p < 0.0001). There was a significant positive correlation between PAP complex and tPA-TEG LY30 (r = 0.74, p < 0.0001). There was no correlation between any fibrinolytic analyte and rTEG LY30. When stratified by phenotype, patients with hypofibrinolysis and nonpathologic fibrinolysis had higher active PAI-1 (p < 0.05) and A2AP levels (p < 0.05), lower PAP (p < 0.05), and tPA-PAI-1 complex (p < 0.05). Tissue-plasminogen activator activity was higher in hyperfibrinolysis relative to the other three groups (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tissue-plasminogen activator-TEG LY30 more accurately reflects fibrinolysis phenotypes in trauma patients than conventional TEG methods. This provides an explanation for tPA-TEG's superior performance over rTEG in predicting clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Basic Science; N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-13DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004521
Patrick L Johnson, Mark R Hemmila, Cody L Mullens, Bryant W Oliphant, Janessa R Monahan, Julia D Kelm, Jill L Jakubus, William J Curtiss, Benjamin D Mosher, Alicia N Kieninger, John W Scott
Background: As increased attention is placed on optimizing long-term outcomes of trauma patients by addressing mental health, little is known regarding the interplay of pre- and postinjury mental health on long-term financial and functional outcomes.
Methods: Patients from 19 Level 1 and 2 trauma centers took part in serial surveys 1 to 24 months postdischarge. Preinjury mental health diagnoses were identified using trauma registry data and postinjury mental health symptoms from survey data. Outcomes included (1) health-related quality of life from the EuroQol-5D-5L and (2) elements of financial toxicity (e.g. medical debt, job/income loss, nonmedical bills, unaffordable care). Multivariable models were created, adjusting for patient, injury, and treatment factors, to evaluate the association of preinjury mental health diagnoses and postinjury mental health symptoms on health-related quality of life and financial toxicity.
Results: A total of 1,017 patients completed 1,297 surveys from July 2021 to December 2023, at a median of 6 months postinjury. Forty-six percent were female, the median age was 67.5 years, and 89% had blunt injuries. Thirty-two percent of patients had a preinjury mental health diagnosis, and 49% had self-reported mental health symptoms postdischarge. Patients with preinjury mental health diagnoses had higher odds of postinjury mental health symptoms (adjusted odds ratio, 3.6 [2.6-4.9]; p < 0.001); however, 55% of those with postinjury symptoms had no preinjury diagnosis. Postinjury symptoms alone were associated with worse health-related quality of life or financial toxicity. Notably, patients with new postinjury mental health symptoms (no preinjury mental health diagnosis) had the highest rate of foregone postinjury care because of costs (26% vs. 14%, p < 0.01).
Conclusion: More than one-in-two patients had peri-injury mental health conditions, and patients with postinjury mental health symptoms experienced worse financial and functional outcomes. Addressing postinjury mental health may potentially improve long-term health-related quality of life of trauma survivors; however, efforts are needed to ensure that patients can afford the care needed for optimal health.
Level of evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.
{"title":"Association of Pre- and Postinjury Mental Health With Long-term Clinical and Financial Outcomes.","authors":"Patrick L Johnson, Mark R Hemmila, Cody L Mullens, Bryant W Oliphant, Janessa R Monahan, Julia D Kelm, Jill L Jakubus, William J Curtiss, Benjamin D Mosher, Alicia N Kieninger, John W Scott","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004521","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004521","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As increased attention is placed on optimizing long-term outcomes of trauma patients by addressing mental health, little is known regarding the interplay of pre- and postinjury mental health on long-term financial and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from 19 Level 1 and 2 trauma centers took part in serial surveys 1 to 24 months postdischarge. Preinjury mental health diagnoses were identified using trauma registry data and postinjury mental health symptoms from survey data. Outcomes included (1) health-related quality of life from the EuroQol-5D-5L and (2) elements of financial toxicity (e.g. medical debt, job/income loss, nonmedical bills, unaffordable care). Multivariable models were created, adjusting for patient, injury, and treatment factors, to evaluate the association of preinjury mental health diagnoses and postinjury mental health symptoms on health-related quality of life and financial toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,017 patients completed 1,297 surveys from July 2021 to December 2023, at a median of 6 months postinjury. Forty-six percent were female, the median age was 67.5 years, and 89% had blunt injuries. Thirty-two percent of patients had a preinjury mental health diagnosis, and 49% had self-reported mental health symptoms postdischarge. Patients with preinjury mental health diagnoses had higher odds of postinjury mental health symptoms (adjusted odds ratio, 3.6 [2.6-4.9]; p < 0.001); however, 55% of those with postinjury symptoms had no preinjury diagnosis. Postinjury symptoms alone were associated with worse health-related quality of life or financial toxicity. Notably, patients with new postinjury mental health symptoms (no preinjury mental health diagnosis) had the highest rate of foregone postinjury care because of costs (26% vs. 14%, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More than one-in-two patients had peri-injury mental health conditions, and patients with postinjury mental health symptoms experienced worse financial and functional outcomes. Addressing postinjury mental health may potentially improve long-term health-related quality of life of trauma survivors; however, efforts are needed to ensure that patients can afford the care needed for optimal health.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142971589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-09DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004540
Julia Harrison, Akshay Bhardwaj, Olivia Houck, Kristiana Sather, Ayako Sekiya, Sarah Knack, Geetha Saarunya Clarke, Michael A Puskarich, Chris Tignanelli, Lisa Rogers, Schelomo Marmor, Greg Beilman
Background: There is conflicting evidence regarding emergency medical service (EMS) provider level of training and outcomes in trauma. We hypothesized that advanced life support (ALS) provider transport is associated with lower mortality compared with basic life support transport.
Methods: We performed secondary analysis of a combined prehospital and in-hospital database of trauma patients utilizing ESO electronic medical records from 2018 to 2022. We included encounters with patients aged 15 years to 100 years transported by ground to a Level I or II trauma center with trauma-specific ICD-10-CM codes. Patients dead upon EMS arrival and transfers were excluded. We matched patients using 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity scores based on demographic, injury, and EMS characteristics, prehospital vitals, and trauma center designation. The exposure variable was EMS level of training and outcome was mortality. We conducted subgroup analyses on predefined cohorts (age > 50 years, mechanism of injury, prehospital EMS time > 30 minutes).
Results: We identified 30,735 ALS and 1,758 basic life support encounters, representing 1,154 pairs following propensity matching. Mortality was lower among patients transported by ALS providers (odds ratio [OR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.88; p = 0.023). Mortality was also lower in the subgroups of patients aged > 50 years (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.98; p = 0.046), and in patients with mechanisms of injury excluding falls (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.98; p = 0.047). In those with prolonged prehospital time, the association approached significance (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.08-1.08; p = 0.067). In those with mechanisms of injury of fall, the association was not significant.
Conclusion: In this retrospective, propensity matched cohort study using a national sample of trauma patients, attendance by ALS providers was associated with reduced mortality. This was observed in the entire cohort, in those aged > 50 years, and those with a higher-risk mechanism of injury. It approached significance in those with prolonged prehospital time.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
{"title":"Emergency medical services level of training is associated with mortality in trauma patients: A combined prehospital and in hospital database analysis.","authors":"Julia Harrison, Akshay Bhardwaj, Olivia Houck, Kristiana Sather, Ayako Sekiya, Sarah Knack, Geetha Saarunya Clarke, Michael A Puskarich, Chris Tignanelli, Lisa Rogers, Schelomo Marmor, Greg Beilman","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004540","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004540","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is conflicting evidence regarding emergency medical service (EMS) provider level of training and outcomes in trauma. We hypothesized that advanced life support (ALS) provider transport is associated with lower mortality compared with basic life support transport.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed secondary analysis of a combined prehospital and in-hospital database of trauma patients utilizing ESO electronic medical records from 2018 to 2022. We included encounters with patients aged 15 years to 100 years transported by ground to a Level I or II trauma center with trauma-specific ICD-10-CM codes. Patients dead upon EMS arrival and transfers were excluded. We matched patients using 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity scores based on demographic, injury, and EMS characteristics, prehospital vitals, and trauma center designation. The exposure variable was EMS level of training and outcome was mortality. We conducted subgroup analyses on predefined cohorts (age > 50 years, mechanism of injury, prehospital EMS time > 30 minutes).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 30,735 ALS and 1,758 basic life support encounters, representing 1,154 pairs following propensity matching. Mortality was lower among patients transported by ALS providers (odds ratio [OR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.88; p = 0.023). Mortality was also lower in the subgroups of patients aged > 50 years (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.98; p = 0.046), and in patients with mechanisms of injury excluding falls (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.98; p = 0.047). In those with prolonged prehospital time, the association approached significance (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.08-1.08; p = 0.067). In those with mechanisms of injury of fall, the association was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this retrospective, propensity matched cohort study using a national sample of trauma patients, attendance by ALS providers was associated with reduced mortality. This was observed in the entire cohort, in those aged > 50 years, and those with a higher-risk mechanism of injury. It approached significance in those with prolonged prehospital time.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142950668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-09DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004505
Eli Mlaver, Elizabeth V Atkins, Regina S Medeiros, Jyotirmay Sharma, Gina Solomon, Luke Galloway, Samual R Todd, James R Dunne, Dennis W Ashley
Background: American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma center verification has demonstrated improved outcomes at individual centers, but its impact on statewide Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Collaboratives is unknown. A statewide TQIP Collaborative, founded in 2011, noted underperformance in six of eight patient cohorts identified in the TQIP Collaborative report. We hypothesized that requiring ACS verification for level I and II trauma centers would result in improved outcomes for the state collaborative.
Methods: The ACS verification requirement was tied to ongoing Trauma Commission funding. Trauma centers were required to apply for an ACS consultative visit by 2017 and were given until 2023 to achieve ACS verification. The effect of this intervention was measured in the number of centers achieving verification and in the performance of the TQIP Collaborative semiannual reports.
Results: In 2015, only 1 of 15 (7%) trauma centers were ACS verified, and 4 had undergone consultative visits. By 2023, 11 of 12 (92%) trauma centers achieved ACS verification. Following this intervention, the observed-to-expected odds ratio for all-patient morbidity and mortality improved from 1.60 to 1.17, and variation among patient-specific cohorts narrowed from 0.97-1.82 to 0.96-1.48 (Figure 2). Performance in all six underperforming patient-specific cohorts improved over the study period.
Conclusion: ACS verification for level I and II trauma centers improves TQIP Collaborative performance. Statewide Collaboratives should consider ACS verification as a requirement for participation.
Level of evidence: Economic and Value-Based Evaluations, Level III.
{"title":"Impact of American College of surgeons trauma verification on statewide collaborative outcomes.","authors":"Eli Mlaver, Elizabeth V Atkins, Regina S Medeiros, Jyotirmay Sharma, Gina Solomon, Luke Galloway, Samual R Todd, James R Dunne, Dennis W Ashley","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004505","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004505","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma center verification has demonstrated improved outcomes at individual centers, but its impact on statewide Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Collaboratives is unknown. A statewide TQIP Collaborative, founded in 2011, noted underperformance in six of eight patient cohorts identified in the TQIP Collaborative report. We hypothesized that requiring ACS verification for level I and II trauma centers would result in improved outcomes for the state collaborative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ACS verification requirement was tied to ongoing Trauma Commission funding. Trauma centers were required to apply for an ACS consultative visit by 2017 and were given until 2023 to achieve ACS verification. The effect of this intervention was measured in the number of centers achieving verification and in the performance of the TQIP Collaborative semiannual reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2015, only 1 of 15 (7%) trauma centers were ACS verified, and 4 had undergone consultative visits. By 2023, 11 of 12 (92%) trauma centers achieved ACS verification. Following this intervention, the observed-to-expected odds ratio for all-patient morbidity and mortality improved from 1.60 to 1.17, and variation among patient-specific cohorts narrowed from 0.97-1.82 to 0.96-1.48 (Figure 2). Performance in all six underperforming patient-specific cohorts improved over the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACS verification for level I and II trauma centers improves TQIP Collaborative performance. Statewide Collaboratives should consider ACS verification as a requirement for participation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Economic and Value-Based Evaluations, Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142950669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004552
Diwas Gautam, David Botros, Jackson Aubrey, Michael T Bounajem, Sarah Lombardo, Janet Cortez, Marta McCrum, Toby Enniss, Megan Puckett, Christian A Bowers, Sarah T Menacho, Ramesh Grandhi
Background: Preinjury antithrombotic (AT) use is associated with worse outcomes for geriatric (65 years or older) patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Previous studies have found that use of AT outside established guidelines is widespread in TBI patients.
Methods: In this single-center retrospective cross-sectional study, we examined inappropriate AT use among geriatric patients presenting with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. We reviewed records of patients 65 years or older with preinjury AT use who presented to a Level 1 trauma center with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage between 2016 and 2023. Patient demographics and AT indications/types were extracted. Appropriateness of AT use was determined using established guidelines.
Results: The cohort comprised 207 patients (56.5% male; median age, 77 years). Fall was the most common mechanism of injury (87.9%). At initial presentation, 87.0% of patients had mild TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale scores 13-15). The two most common indications for AT use were atrial fibrillation (41.5%) and venous thromboembolism (14.5%). Anticoagulation therapy was used by 51.7% of patients, antiplatelet therapy by 40.1%, and both by 8.2%. Prescribed AT agents included warfarin (23.2%), direct oral anticoagulants (36.2%), aspirin (32.4%), and clopidogrel (15.0%). Per clinical guidelines, 31 patients (15.0%) were determined to be inappropriately on AT therapy. On multivariable analysis, venous thromboembolism (odds ratio [OR], 5.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80-15.71; p = 0.002) and arterial stent (OR, 4.69; 95% CI, 1.53-14.37; p = 0.007) were associated with inappropriate AT use; aspirin was the most common inappropriately prescribed AT (OR, 3.59; 95% CI, 1.45-8.91; p = 0.006).
Conclusion: Overall, 15% of geriatric TBI patients with preinjury AT use were prescribed this therapy outside of current guidelines. Trauma providers should remain vigilant in identifying such patients and collaborate across multidisciplinary teams to implement interventions that minimize inappropriate AT use.
Level of evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiological Study; Level IV.
{"title":"Inappropriate antithrombotic use in geriatric patients with complicated traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Diwas Gautam, David Botros, Jackson Aubrey, Michael T Bounajem, Sarah Lombardo, Janet Cortez, Marta McCrum, Toby Enniss, Megan Puckett, Christian A Bowers, Sarah T Menacho, Ramesh Grandhi","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004552","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004552","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preinjury antithrombotic (AT) use is associated with worse outcomes for geriatric (65 years or older) patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Previous studies have found that use of AT outside established guidelines is widespread in TBI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective cross-sectional study, we examined inappropriate AT use among geriatric patients presenting with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. We reviewed records of patients 65 years or older with preinjury AT use who presented to a Level 1 trauma center with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage between 2016 and 2023. Patient demographics and AT indications/types were extracted. Appropriateness of AT use was determined using established guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort comprised 207 patients (56.5% male; median age, 77 years). Fall was the most common mechanism of injury (87.9%). At initial presentation, 87.0% of patients had mild TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale scores 13-15). The two most common indications for AT use were atrial fibrillation (41.5%) and venous thromboembolism (14.5%). Anticoagulation therapy was used by 51.7% of patients, antiplatelet therapy by 40.1%, and both by 8.2%. Prescribed AT agents included warfarin (23.2%), direct oral anticoagulants (36.2%), aspirin (32.4%), and clopidogrel (15.0%). Per clinical guidelines, 31 patients (15.0%) were determined to be inappropriately on AT therapy. On multivariable analysis, venous thromboembolism (odds ratio [OR], 5.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80-15.71; p = 0.002) and arterial stent (OR, 4.69; 95% CI, 1.53-14.37; p = 0.007) were associated with inappropriate AT use; aspirin was the most common inappropriately prescribed AT (OR, 3.59; 95% CI, 1.45-8.91; p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, 15% of geriatric TBI patients with preinjury AT use were prescribed this therapy outside of current guidelines. Trauma providers should remain vigilant in identifying such patients and collaborate across multidisciplinary teams to implement interventions that minimize inappropriate AT use.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic and Epidemiological Study; Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142932229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004531
Itay Fogel, Snir Balziano, Michal Tunik, Dan Prat, Ran Barzilay, Nehemia Greenstein
Background: Combat-related injuries have evolved in urban warfare because of close-contact engagements and high-energy blast injuries, with rapid medical evacuation improving survival rates. This study analyzes injury patterns and outcomes in the Gaza conflict, emphasizing the need to optimize trauma care protocols in modern combat environments, particularly because of the unique proximity of conflict zones to tertiary trauma centers.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at a single center involving 189 patients evacuated by helicopter to a Level I tertiary trauma center. Subgroup analysis based on Injury Severity Scores was performed.
Results: Shrapnel impacts were the leading cause of injuries (58.7%), followed by blast injuries (48.1%) and gunshot wounds (30.7%). Extremity injuries were most common (61.4%), with 46.3% of patients needing surgery within 24 hours, mainly orthopedic procedures (75.3%). The average hospital stay was 21.9 days. In-hospital mortality rate was 4.2% (two patients). Infections occurred in 17.9% of cases, with fungal infections at 8.9% and bacterial infections at 15.3%.
Conclusion: In modern urban warfare, effective medical interventions play a crucial role in mitigating challenges. This study emphasizes the importance of rapid evacuation and advanced trauma management, reflected in low in-hospital mortality rates, highlighting the significance of timely interventions, personal protective equipment, specialized orthopedic trauma care, and robust infection control measures.
Level of evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.
{"title":"Efficient evacuation - enhanced survival: Insights from Gaza conflict trauma care.","authors":"Itay Fogel, Snir Balziano, Michal Tunik, Dan Prat, Ran Barzilay, Nehemia Greenstein","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004531","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004531","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Combat-related injuries have evolved in urban warfare because of close-contact engagements and high-energy blast injuries, with rapid medical evacuation improving survival rates. This study analyzes injury patterns and outcomes in the Gaza conflict, emphasizing the need to optimize trauma care protocols in modern combat environments, particularly because of the unique proximity of conflict zones to tertiary trauma centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted at a single center involving 189 patients evacuated by helicopter to a Level I tertiary trauma center. Subgroup analysis based on Injury Severity Scores was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Shrapnel impacts were the leading cause of injuries (58.7%), followed by blast injuries (48.1%) and gunshot wounds (30.7%). Extremity injuries were most common (61.4%), with 46.3% of patients needing surgery within 24 hours, mainly orthopedic procedures (75.3%). The average hospital stay was 21.9 days. In-hospital mortality rate was 4.2% (two patients). Infections occurred in 17.9% of cases, with fungal infections at 8.9% and bacterial infections at 15.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In modern urban warfare, effective medical interventions play a crucial role in mitigating challenges. This study emphasizes the importance of rapid evacuation and advanced trauma management, reflected in low in-hospital mortality rates, highlighting the significance of timely interventions, personal protective equipment, specialized orthopedic trauma care, and robust infection control measures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142932222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004532
Louis A Perkins, Zongyang Mou, Jessica Masch, Brandon Harris, Amy E Liepert, Todd W Costantini, Laura N Haines, Allison Berndtson, Laura Adams, Jay J Doucet, Jarrett E Santorelli
Background: Given the high mortality and morbidity of emergency general surgery (EGS), designing and implementing effective quality assessment tools is imperative. Currently accepted EGS risk scores are limited by the need for manual extraction, which is time-intensive and costly. We developed an automated institutional electronic health record (EHR)-linked EGS registry that calculates a modified Emergency Surgery Score (mESS) and a modified Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) score and demonstrated their use in benchmarking outcomes.
Methods: The EHR-linked EGS registry was queried for patients undergoing emergent laparotomies from 2018 to 2023. Data captured included demographics, admission and discharge data, diagnoses, procedures, vitals, and laboratories. The mESS and modified POTTER (mPOTTER) were calculated based off previously defined variables, with estimation of subjective variables using diagnosis codes and other abstracted treatment variables. This was validated against ESS and the POTTER risk calculators by chart review. Observed versus expected (O:E) 30-day mortality and complication ratios were generated.
Results: The EGS registry captured 177 emergent laparotomies. There were 32 deaths (18%) and 79 complications (45%) within 30 days of surgery. For mortality, the mean difference between the mESS and ESS risk predictions for mortality was 3% (SD, 10%) with 86% of mESS predictions within 10% of ESS. The mean difference between the mPOTTER and POTTER was -2% (SD, 11%) with 76% of mPOTTER predictions within 10% of POTTER. Observed versus expected ratios by mESS and ESS were 1.45 and 1.86, respectively, and for mPOTTER and POTTER, they were 1.45 and 1.30, respectively. There was similarly good agreement between automated and manual risk scores in predicting complications.
Conclusion: Our study highlights the effective implementation of an institutional EHR-linked EGS registry equipped to generate automated quality metrics. This demonstrates potential in enhancing the standardization and assessment of EGS care while mitigating the need for extensive human resources investment.
Level of evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiologic Study; Level III.
{"title":"Automating excellence: A breakthrough in emergency general surgery quality benchmarking.","authors":"Louis A Perkins, Zongyang Mou, Jessica Masch, Brandon Harris, Amy E Liepert, Todd W Costantini, Laura N Haines, Allison Berndtson, Laura Adams, Jay J Doucet, Jarrett E Santorelli","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004532","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004532","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the high mortality and morbidity of emergency general surgery (EGS), designing and implementing effective quality assessment tools is imperative. Currently accepted EGS risk scores are limited by the need for manual extraction, which is time-intensive and costly. We developed an automated institutional electronic health record (EHR)-linked EGS registry that calculates a modified Emergency Surgery Score (mESS) and a modified Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) score and demonstrated their use in benchmarking outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The EHR-linked EGS registry was queried for patients undergoing emergent laparotomies from 2018 to 2023. Data captured included demographics, admission and discharge data, diagnoses, procedures, vitals, and laboratories. The mESS and modified POTTER (mPOTTER) were calculated based off previously defined variables, with estimation of subjective variables using diagnosis codes and other abstracted treatment variables. This was validated against ESS and the POTTER risk calculators by chart review. Observed versus expected (O:E) 30-day mortality and complication ratios were generated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EGS registry captured 177 emergent laparotomies. There were 32 deaths (18%) and 79 complications (45%) within 30 days of surgery. For mortality, the mean difference between the mESS and ESS risk predictions for mortality was 3% (SD, 10%) with 86% of mESS predictions within 10% of ESS. The mean difference between the mPOTTER and POTTER was -2% (SD, 11%) with 76% of mPOTTER predictions within 10% of POTTER. Observed versus expected ratios by mESS and ESS were 1.45 and 1.86, respectively, and for mPOTTER and POTTER, they were 1.45 and 1.30, respectively. There was similarly good agreement between automated and manual risk scores in predicting complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights the effective implementation of an institutional EHR-linked EGS registry equipped to generate automated quality metrics. This demonstrates potential in enhancing the standardization and assessment of EGS care while mitigating the need for extensive human resources investment.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic and Epidemiologic Study; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142932207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}