首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Reply letter to "Whether sternum fractures increase the injury severity in patients with thoracic vertebral fracture needs further evaluation". 对“胸骨骨折是否增加胸椎骨折患者损伤严重程度有待进一步评估”的复函。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004533
Anthony di Natale, Gary W Nace, Michael L Nance
{"title":"Reply letter to \"Whether sternum fractures increase the injury severity in patients with thoracic vertebral fracture needs further evaluation\".","authors":"Anthony di Natale, Gary W Nace, Michael L Nance","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004533","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004533","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is associated with decreased mortality in non-acute respiratory distress syndrome patients following severe blunt thoracic trauma. 体外膜氧合与严重钝性胸外伤后非急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者死亡率降低相关。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004544
Bardiya Zangbar, Aryan Rafieezadeh, Kartik Prabhakaran, Anna Jose, Ilya Shnaydman, Matthew Bronstein, Joshua Klein, Gabriel Froula, Jordan Kirsch

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a critical intervention in the management of patients with trauma-induced cardiorespiratory failure. This study aims to compare outcomes in patients with severe thoracic injuries with and without venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO).

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2021) and included all patients with isolated blunt thoracic injuries with Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥4 who required intubation. Patients were divided into two groups based on VV-ECMO and were compared using propensity score matching with the primary outcome of mortality.

Results: A total of 14,106 patients with severe thoracic injuries were identified. Propensity score matching resulted in two groups of 812 VV-ECMO and 812 non-VV-ECMO groups. Venovenous ECMO group had significantly lower in-hospital mortality rates (22.3% vs. 37.3%, p < 0.001). However, VV-ECMO group had significantly higher rates of complications including cardiac arrest (27.7% vs. 10.6%), pulmonary embolism (7.6% vs. 2.1%), ventilator-associated pneumonia (16.7% vs. 4.2%), unplanned intubation (11.9% vs. 8.5%), unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission (8.4% vs. 4.9%), and unplanned return to operation room (10.1% vs. 2.6%) (p < 0.001, for all). Patients in VV-ECMO group had significantly higher hospital (29.46 ± 26.37 vs. 13.59 ± 13.3 days) and ICU (22.96 ± 19.38 vs. 9.38 ± 9.05 days) length of stay (p < 0.001, for both). In VV-ECMO group, the mean ± SD time to perform VV-ECMO was 5.54 ± 5.91 days. Each day earlier initiation of VV-ECMO resulted in decreased hospital and ICU length of stay by 67.1% and 59.9%, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). Among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (n = 435 in each group after repeated PS matching), we observed significantly lower mortality rates in VV-ECMO group (26.9% vs. 40%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: While VV-ECMO in isolated blunt thoracic trauma patients is associated with higher survival rates even in non-acute respiratory distress syndrome cases, it is associated with higher incidence of complications. These findings emphasize earlier consideration of VV-ECMO in severe blunt thoracic trauma.

Level of evidence: Retrospective Study; Level III.

背景:体外膜氧合(ECMO)已成为创伤性心肺衰竭患者管理的关键干预措施。本研究的目的是比较重症胸外伤患者采用和不采用静脉-静脉体外膜氧合(VV-ECMO)治疗的结果。方法:我们进行了一项创伤质量改善计划(2017-2021)的回顾性队列研究,纳入了所有需要插管的单纯钝性胸部损伤患者,其简略损伤量表评分≥4分。根据VV-ECMO将患者分为两组,并使用倾向评分与死亡率的主要结局相匹配进行比较。结果:共鉴定出14106例重型胸外伤患者。倾向评分匹配结果为812例VV-ECMO组和812例非VV-ECMO组。静脉-静脉ECMO组住院死亡率显著降低(22.3% vs. 37.3%, p < 0.001)。然而,VV-ECMO组的并发症发生率明显更高,包括心脏骤停(27.7%比10.6%)、肺栓塞(7.6%比2.1%)、呼吸机相关性肺炎(16.7%比4.2%)、计划外插管(11.9%比8.5%)、计划外重症监护病房(ICU)入院(8.4%比4.9%)和计划外返回手术室(10.1%比2.6%)(均p < 0.001)。VV-ECMO组患者住院时间(29.46±26.37天比13.59±13.3天)和ICU住院时间(22.96±19.38天比9.38±9.05天)均显著高于对照组(p < 0.001)。VV-ECMO组VV-ECMO的平均±SD时间为5.54±5.91天。每提前一天开始VV-ECMO,住院时间和ICU住院时间分别减少67.1%和59.9% (p < 0.001)。在无急性呼吸窘迫综合征的患者中(重复PS匹配后每组n = 435例),我们观察到VV-ECMO组的死亡率显著降低(26.9% vs. 40%, p < 0.001)。结论:孤立性钝性胸外伤患者的VV-ECMO即使在非急性呼吸窘迫综合征病例中也具有较高的生存率,但其并发症发生率较高。这些发现强调了在严重钝性胸外伤中早期考虑VV-ECMO。证据水平:回顾性研究;第三层次。
{"title":"Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is associated with decreased mortality in non-acute respiratory distress syndrome patients following severe blunt thoracic trauma.","authors":"Bardiya Zangbar, Aryan Rafieezadeh, Kartik Prabhakaran, Anna Jose, Ilya Shnaydman, Matthew Bronstein, Joshua Klein, Gabriel Froula, Jordan Kirsch","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004544","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004544","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a critical intervention in the management of patients with trauma-induced cardiorespiratory failure. This study aims to compare outcomes in patients with severe thoracic injuries with and without venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study on Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2021) and included all patients with isolated blunt thoracic injuries with Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥4 who required intubation. Patients were divided into two groups based on VV-ECMO and were compared using propensity score matching with the primary outcome of mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14,106 patients with severe thoracic injuries were identified. Propensity score matching resulted in two groups of 812 VV-ECMO and 812 non-VV-ECMO groups. Venovenous ECMO group had significantly lower in-hospital mortality rates (22.3% vs. 37.3%, p < 0.001). However, VV-ECMO group had significantly higher rates of complications including cardiac arrest (27.7% vs. 10.6%), pulmonary embolism (7.6% vs. 2.1%), ventilator-associated pneumonia (16.7% vs. 4.2%), unplanned intubation (11.9% vs. 8.5%), unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission (8.4% vs. 4.9%), and unplanned return to operation room (10.1% vs. 2.6%) (p < 0.001, for all). Patients in VV-ECMO group had significantly higher hospital (29.46 ± 26.37 vs. 13.59 ± 13.3 days) and ICU (22.96 ± 19.38 vs. 9.38 ± 9.05 days) length of stay (p < 0.001, for both). In VV-ECMO group, the mean ± SD time to perform VV-ECMO was 5.54 ± 5.91 days. Each day earlier initiation of VV-ECMO resulted in decreased hospital and ICU length of stay by 67.1% and 59.9%, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). Among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (n = 435 in each group after repeated PS matching), we observed significantly lower mortality rates in VV-ECMO group (26.9% vs. 40%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While VV-ECMO in isolated blunt thoracic trauma patients is associated with higher survival rates even in non-acute respiratory distress syndrome cases, it is associated with higher incidence of complications. These findings emphasize earlier consideration of VV-ECMO in severe blunt thoracic trauma.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Retrospective Study; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An introduction to propensity score analysis in acute care surgery research: Methodology and pitfalls. 急症外科研究中的倾向评分分析:方法与陷阱。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004566
Tabitha Garwe, Zakhary L Bishoy

Abstract: Observational studies assessing causal effects of interventions are subject to indication (selection) bias, which may be difficult to eliminate using traditional multivariable techniques. When properly specified, propensity score-adjusted analysis may offer an advantage traditional regression by ensuring that investigators explicitly assess comparability of baseline prognostic factors between the treated and untreated. However, it is important to note that the effectiveness of a propensity score-adjusted analysis depends on the variables selected for the model and the analytic approach. Noninclusion of important prognostic factors and model misspecification among other errors may in fact increase bias; thus, in performing propensity score analysis, these errors must be minimized as much as possible or assessed using sensitivity analysis to ensure validity.

摘要:评估干预措施因果效应的观察性研究存在指征(选择)偏倚,这种偏倚可能难以用传统的多变量技术消除。当适当指定时,倾向评分调整分析可以提供传统回归的优势,确保研究者明确评估治疗组和未治疗组之间基线预后因素的可比性。然而,重要的是要注意,倾向得分调整分析的有效性取决于为模型和分析方法选择的变量。事实上,不包括重要的预后因素和其他错误中的模型错误可能会增加偏倚;因此,在进行倾向评分分析时,必须尽可能地减少这些误差,或者使用敏感性分析来评估以确保有效性。
{"title":"An introduction to propensity score analysis in acute care surgery research: Methodology and pitfalls.","authors":"Tabitha Garwe, Zakhary L Bishoy","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004566","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004566","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Observational studies assessing causal effects of interventions are subject to indication (selection) bias, which may be difficult to eliminate using traditional multivariable techniques. When properly specified, propensity score-adjusted analysis may offer an advantage traditional regression by ensuring that investigators explicitly assess comparability of baseline prognostic factors between the treated and untreated. However, it is important to note that the effectiveness of a propensity score-adjusted analysis depends on the variables selected for the model and the analytic approach. Noninclusion of important prognostic factors and model misspecification among other errors may in fact increase bias; thus, in performing propensity score analysis, these errors must be minimized as much as possible or assessed using sensitivity analysis to ensure validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The tissue-plasminogen activator-challenged thromboelastography provides a comprehensive assessment of fibrinolysis in the severely injured. 组织纤溶酶原激活物挑战的血栓弹性成像提供了一个全面的评估纤维蛋白溶解在严重损伤。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004526
Elizabeth R Maginot, Hunter B Moore, Ernest E Moore, Isabella M Bernhardt, Trace B Moody, Collin M White, Halima Siddiqui, Flobater I Gawargi, Reynold Henry, James G Chandler, Angela Sauaia, Christopher D Barrett

Background: Tissue-plasminogen activator-challenged thromboelastography (tPA-TEG) predicts massive transfusion and mortality better than conventional rapid thromboelastography (rTEG), with little concordance between their lysis values (LY30). We hypothesized that the main fibrinolytic inhibitors plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and α-2 antiplasmin (A2AP), as well as markers of fibrinolytic activation (plasmin-antiplasmin [PAP], tPA-PAI-1 complex, tPA activity), would correlate more strongly with tPA-TEG versus rTEG LY30 and may explain the recent findings of four distinct fibrinolytic phenotypes in trauma based on these two TEG methodologies.

Methods: Adult trauma patients (n = 56) had tPA-TEG, rTEG, and plasma obtained on arrival to the emergency department with institutional review board approval. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 activity, A2AP, PAP, and tPA-PAI-1 complex as well as tPA activity were measured. Data were analyzed using Spearman's correlations and analysis of variance.

Results: The median age was 34 years, 75% were male, and the New Injury Severity Score was 14. Mortality was 25%, and 23% required a massive transfusion. There was a significant negative correlation between PAI-1 activity and A2AP with tPA-TEG LY30 (r = -0.77, p < 0.0001 and r = -0.62, p < 0.0001). There was a significant positive correlation between PAP complex and tPA-TEG LY30 (r = 0.74, p < 0.0001). There was no correlation between any fibrinolytic analyte and rTEG LY30. When stratified by phenotype, patients with hypofibrinolysis and nonpathologic fibrinolysis had higher active PAI-1 (p < 0.05) and A2AP levels (p < 0.05), lower PAP (p < 0.05), and tPA-PAI-1 complex (p < 0.05). Tissue-plasminogen activator activity was higher in hyperfibrinolysis relative to the other three groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Tissue-plasminogen activator-TEG LY30 more accurately reflects fibrinolysis phenotypes in trauma patients than conventional TEG methods. This provides an explanation for tPA-TEG's superior performance over rTEG in predicting clinical outcomes.

Level of evidence: Basic Science; N/A.

背景:组织纤溶酶原激活物激发的血栓弹性成像(tPA-TEG)比传统的快速血栓弹性成像(rTEG)更能预测大量输血和死亡率,两者的溶解值(LY30)几乎没有一致性。我们假设主要的纤溶酶抑制剂纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂-1 (PAI-1)和α-2抗纤溶酶(A2AP),以及纤溶酶激活标志物(纤溶酶抗纤溶酶[PAP], tPA-PAI-1复合物,tPA活性)与tPA-TEG和rTEG LY30的相关性更强,并且可以解释最近基于这两种TEG方法在创伤中发现的四种不同的纤溶表型。方法:56例成人外伤患者经机构审查委员会批准,在到达急诊科时进行tPA-TEG、rTEG和血浆检测。测定纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂-1活性、A2AP、PAP、tPA- pai -1复合物及tPA活性。数据分析采用Spearman相关和方差分析。结果:中位年龄34岁,男性占75%,新损伤严重程度评分为14分。死亡率为25%,23%的人需要大量输血。PAI-1活性、A2AP与tPA-TEG LY30呈显著负相关(r = -0.77, p < 0.0001; r = -0.62, p < 0.0001)。PAP复合物与tPA-TEG LY30呈显著正相关(r = 0.74, p < 0.0001)。任何纤溶分析物与rTEG LY30均无相关性。当按表型分层时,低纤溶和非病理性纤溶患者活性PAI-1和A2AP水平较高(p < 0.05), PAP水平较低(p < 0.05), tPA-PAI-1复合物水平较低(p < 0.05)。高纤溶组组织纤溶酶原激活物活性高于其他3组(p < 0.05)。结论:组织-纤溶酶原激活物-TEG LY30比常规TEG方法更准确地反映创伤患者的纤溶表型。这就解释了tPA-TEG在预测临床结果方面优于rTEG的原因。证据水平:基础科学;N/A。
{"title":"The tissue-plasminogen activator-challenged thromboelastography provides a comprehensive assessment of fibrinolysis in the severely injured.","authors":"Elizabeth R Maginot, Hunter B Moore, Ernest E Moore, Isabella M Bernhardt, Trace B Moody, Collin M White, Halima Siddiqui, Flobater I Gawargi, Reynold Henry, James G Chandler, Angela Sauaia, Christopher D Barrett","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004526","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004526","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tissue-plasminogen activator-challenged thromboelastography (tPA-TEG) predicts massive transfusion and mortality better than conventional rapid thromboelastography (rTEG), with little concordance between their lysis values (LY30). We hypothesized that the main fibrinolytic inhibitors plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and α-2 antiplasmin (A2AP), as well as markers of fibrinolytic activation (plasmin-antiplasmin [PAP], tPA-PAI-1 complex, tPA activity), would correlate more strongly with tPA-TEG versus rTEG LY30 and may explain the recent findings of four distinct fibrinolytic phenotypes in trauma based on these two TEG methodologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult trauma patients (n = 56) had tPA-TEG, rTEG, and plasma obtained on arrival to the emergency department with institutional review board approval. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 activity, A2AP, PAP, and tPA-PAI-1 complex as well as tPA activity were measured. Data were analyzed using Spearman's correlations and analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 34 years, 75% were male, and the New Injury Severity Score was 14. Mortality was 25%, and 23% required a massive transfusion. There was a significant negative correlation between PAI-1 activity and A2AP with tPA-TEG LY30 (r = -0.77, p < 0.0001 and r = -0.62, p < 0.0001). There was a significant positive correlation between PAP complex and tPA-TEG LY30 (r = 0.74, p < 0.0001). There was no correlation between any fibrinolytic analyte and rTEG LY30. When stratified by phenotype, patients with hypofibrinolysis and nonpathologic fibrinolysis had higher active PAI-1 (p < 0.05) and A2AP levels (p < 0.05), lower PAP (p < 0.05), and tPA-PAI-1 complex (p < 0.05). Tissue-plasminogen activator activity was higher in hyperfibrinolysis relative to the other three groups (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tissue-plasminogen activator-TEG LY30 more accurately reflects fibrinolysis phenotypes in trauma patients than conventional TEG methods. This provides an explanation for tPA-TEG's superior performance over rTEG in predicting clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Basic Science; N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of Pre- and Postinjury Mental Health With Long-term Clinical and Financial Outcomes. 损伤前后心理健康与长期临床和财务结果的关系
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004521
Patrick L Johnson, Mark R Hemmila, Cody L Mullens, Bryant W Oliphant, Janessa R Monahan, Julia D Kelm, Jill L Jakubus, William J Curtiss, Benjamin D Mosher, Alicia N Kieninger, John W Scott

Background: As increased attention is placed on optimizing long-term outcomes of trauma patients by addressing mental health, little is known regarding the interplay of pre- and postinjury mental health on long-term financial and functional outcomes.

Methods: Patients from 19 Level 1 and 2 trauma centers took part in serial surveys 1 to 24 months postdischarge. Preinjury mental health diagnoses were identified using trauma registry data and postinjury mental health symptoms from survey data. Outcomes included (1) health-related quality of life from the EuroQol-5D-5L and (2) elements of financial toxicity (e.g. medical debt, job/income loss, nonmedical bills, unaffordable care). Multivariable models were created, adjusting for patient, injury, and treatment factors, to evaluate the association of preinjury mental health diagnoses and postinjury mental health symptoms on health-related quality of life and financial toxicity.

Results: A total of 1,017 patients completed 1,297 surveys from July 2021 to December 2023, at a median of 6 months postinjury. Forty-six percent were female, the median age was 67.5 years, and 89% had blunt injuries. Thirty-two percent of patients had a preinjury mental health diagnosis, and 49% had self-reported mental health symptoms postdischarge. Patients with preinjury mental health diagnoses had higher odds of postinjury mental health symptoms (adjusted odds ratio, 3.6 [2.6-4.9]; p < 0.001); however, 55% of those with postinjury symptoms had no preinjury diagnosis. Postinjury symptoms alone were associated with worse health-related quality of life or financial toxicity. Notably, patients with new postinjury mental health symptoms (no preinjury mental health diagnosis) had the highest rate of foregone postinjury care because of costs (26% vs. 14%, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: More than one-in-two patients had peri-injury mental health conditions, and patients with postinjury mental health symptoms experienced worse financial and functional outcomes. Addressing postinjury mental health may potentially improve long-term health-related quality of life of trauma survivors; however, efforts are needed to ensure that patients can afford the care needed for optimal health.

Level of evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

背景:随着人们越来越关注通过解决心理健康问题来优化创伤患者的长期预后,人们对损伤前后心理健康对长期财务和功能预后的相互作用知之甚少。方法:对19家1、2级外伤中心的患者进行出院后1 ~ 24个月的连续调查。根据创伤登记数据和调查数据确定伤前心理健康诊断和伤后心理健康症状。结果包括(1)EuroQol-5D-5L中与健康相关的生活质量和(2)财务毒性因素(如医疗债务、工作/收入损失、非医疗账单、负担不起的医疗)。建立了多变量模型,调整了患者、损伤和治疗因素,以评估损伤前心理健康诊断和损伤后心理健康症状与健康相关的生活质量和财务毒性的关系。结果:从2021年7月至2023年12月,共有1017名患者完成了1297次调查,中位时间为损伤后6个月。46%为女性,中位年龄为67.5岁,89%为钝性损伤。32%的患者在受伤前有心理健康诊断,49%的患者在出院后有自我报告的心理健康症状。损伤前心理健康诊断的患者出现损伤后心理健康症状的几率较高(校正优势比为3.6 [2.6-4.9];P < 0.001);然而,55%有损伤后症状的患者没有损伤前诊断。仅损伤后症状与较差的健康相关生活质量或经济毒性相关。值得注意的是,有新的损伤后精神健康症状(没有损伤前精神健康诊断)的患者由于费用原因放弃损伤后护理的比例最高(26%比14%,p < 0.01)。结论:超过二分之一的患者有损伤前后的精神健康状况,损伤后精神健康症状的患者有更差的经济和功能结局。解决创伤后心理健康问题可能会潜在地改善创伤幸存者的长期健康相关生活质量;然而,需要努力确保患者能够负担得起最佳健康所需的护理。证据水平:预后和流行病学;IV级。
{"title":"Association of Pre- and Postinjury Mental Health With Long-term Clinical and Financial Outcomes.","authors":"Patrick L Johnson, Mark R Hemmila, Cody L Mullens, Bryant W Oliphant, Janessa R Monahan, Julia D Kelm, Jill L Jakubus, William J Curtiss, Benjamin D Mosher, Alicia N Kieninger, John W Scott","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004521","DOIUrl":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004521","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As increased attention is placed on optimizing long-term outcomes of trauma patients by addressing mental health, little is known regarding the interplay of pre- and postinjury mental health on long-term financial and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from 19 Level 1 and 2 trauma centers took part in serial surveys 1 to 24 months postdischarge. Preinjury mental health diagnoses were identified using trauma registry data and postinjury mental health symptoms from survey data. Outcomes included (1) health-related quality of life from the EuroQol-5D-5L and (2) elements of financial toxicity (e.g. medical debt, job/income loss, nonmedical bills, unaffordable care). Multivariable models were created, adjusting for patient, injury, and treatment factors, to evaluate the association of preinjury mental health diagnoses and postinjury mental health symptoms on health-related quality of life and financial toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,017 patients completed 1,297 surveys from July 2021 to December 2023, at a median of 6 months postinjury. Forty-six percent were female, the median age was 67.5 years, and 89% had blunt injuries. Thirty-two percent of patients had a preinjury mental health diagnosis, and 49% had self-reported mental health symptoms postdischarge. Patients with preinjury mental health diagnoses had higher odds of postinjury mental health symptoms (adjusted odds ratio, 3.6 [2.6-4.9]; p < 0.001); however, 55% of those with postinjury symptoms had no preinjury diagnosis. Postinjury symptoms alone were associated with worse health-related quality of life or financial toxicity. Notably, patients with new postinjury mental health symptoms (no preinjury mental health diagnosis) had the highest rate of foregone postinjury care because of costs (26% vs. 14%, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More than one-in-two patients had peri-injury mental health conditions, and patients with postinjury mental health symptoms experienced worse financial and functional outcomes. Addressing postinjury mental health may potentially improve long-term health-related quality of life of trauma survivors; however, efforts are needed to ensure that patients can afford the care needed for optimal health.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142971589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emergency medical services level of training is associated with mortality in trauma patients: A combined prehospital and in hospital database analysis. 急救医疗服务培训水平与创伤患者死亡率相关:院前和院内综合数据库分析
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004540
Julia Harrison, Akshay Bhardwaj, Olivia Houck, Kristiana Sather, Ayako Sekiya, Sarah Knack, Geetha Saarunya Clarke, Michael A Puskarich, Chris Tignanelli, Lisa Rogers, Schelomo Marmor, Greg Beilman

Background: There is conflicting evidence regarding emergency medical service (EMS) provider level of training and outcomes in trauma. We hypothesized that advanced life support (ALS) provider transport is associated with lower mortality compared with basic life support transport.

Methods: We performed secondary analysis of a combined prehospital and in-hospital database of trauma patients utilizing ESO electronic medical records from 2018 to 2022. We included encounters with patients aged 15 years to 100 years transported by ground to a Level I or II trauma center with trauma-specific ICD-10-CM codes. Patients dead upon EMS arrival and transfers were excluded. We matched patients using 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity scores based on demographic, injury, and EMS characteristics, prehospital vitals, and trauma center designation. The exposure variable was EMS level of training and outcome was mortality. We conducted subgroup analyses on predefined cohorts (age > 50 years, mechanism of injury, prehospital EMS time > 30 minutes).

Results: We identified 30,735 ALS and 1,758 basic life support encounters, representing 1,154 pairs following propensity matching. Mortality was lower among patients transported by ALS providers (odds ratio [OR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.88; p = 0.023). Mortality was also lower in the subgroups of patients aged > 50 years (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.98; p = 0.046), and in patients with mechanisms of injury excluding falls (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.98; p = 0.047). In those with prolonged prehospital time, the association approached significance (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.08-1.08; p = 0.067). In those with mechanisms of injury of fall, the association was not significant.

Conclusion: In this retrospective, propensity matched cohort study using a national sample of trauma patients, attendance by ALS providers was associated with reduced mortality. This was observed in the entire cohort, in those aged > 50 years, and those with a higher-risk mechanism of injury. It approached significance in those with prolonged prehospital time.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

背景:关于急救医疗服务(EMS)提供者的培训水平和创伤治疗的结果,有相互矛盾的证据。我们假设,与基本生命支持运输相比,高级生命支持(ALS)提供者运输与较低的死亡率相关。方法:利用ESO电子病历对2018年至2022年创伤患者院前和院内联合数据库进行二次分析。我们纳入了年龄在15岁至100岁之间的患者,这些患者被地面送往具有创伤特异性ICD-10-CM代码的I级或II级创伤中心。EMS到达和转院时死亡的患者排除在外。我们根据人口统计学、损伤和EMS特征、院前生命体征和创伤中心指定,使用1:1的最近邻倾向评分对患者进行匹配。暴露变量为EMS训练水平,结果为死亡率。我们对预先确定的队列(年龄> ~ 50岁,损伤机制,院前EMS时间> ~ 30分钟)进行了亚组分析。结果:我们确定了30,735例ALS和1,758例基本生命支持遭遇,代表了1,154对倾向匹配。由ALS提供者运送的患者死亡率较低(优势比[OR], 0.40;95%置信区间[CI], 0.18-0.88;P = 0.023)。50 ~ 50岁患者亚组死亡率也较低(OR, 0.35;95% ci, 0.13-0.98;p = 0.046),以及不包括跌倒的损伤机制(OR, 0.35;95% ci, 0.13-0.98;P = 0.047)。在院前时间延长的患者中,相关性接近显著性(OR, 0.30;95% ci, 0.08-1.08;P = 0.067)。在有跌倒损伤机制的患者中,相关性不显著。结论:在这项使用全国创伤患者样本的回顾性倾向匹配队列研究中,ALS提供者的就诊与死亡率降低有关。这在整个队列中观察到,在那些年龄在50 - 50岁之间的人,以及那些具有较高损伤机制的人。在院前时间延长的患者中接近有意义。证据水平:治疗/护理管理;第三层次。
{"title":"Emergency medical services level of training is associated with mortality in trauma patients: A combined prehospital and in hospital database analysis.","authors":"Julia Harrison, Akshay Bhardwaj, Olivia Houck, Kristiana Sather, Ayako Sekiya, Sarah Knack, Geetha Saarunya Clarke, Michael A Puskarich, Chris Tignanelli, Lisa Rogers, Schelomo Marmor, Greg Beilman","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004540","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004540","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is conflicting evidence regarding emergency medical service (EMS) provider level of training and outcomes in trauma. We hypothesized that advanced life support (ALS) provider transport is associated with lower mortality compared with basic life support transport.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed secondary analysis of a combined prehospital and in-hospital database of trauma patients utilizing ESO electronic medical records from 2018 to 2022. We included encounters with patients aged 15 years to 100 years transported by ground to a Level I or II trauma center with trauma-specific ICD-10-CM codes. Patients dead upon EMS arrival and transfers were excluded. We matched patients using 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity scores based on demographic, injury, and EMS characteristics, prehospital vitals, and trauma center designation. The exposure variable was EMS level of training and outcome was mortality. We conducted subgroup analyses on predefined cohorts (age > 50 years, mechanism of injury, prehospital EMS time > 30 minutes).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 30,735 ALS and 1,758 basic life support encounters, representing 1,154 pairs following propensity matching. Mortality was lower among patients transported by ALS providers (odds ratio [OR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.88; p = 0.023). Mortality was also lower in the subgroups of patients aged > 50 years (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.98; p = 0.046), and in patients with mechanisms of injury excluding falls (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.98; p = 0.047). In those with prolonged prehospital time, the association approached significance (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.08-1.08; p = 0.067). In those with mechanisms of injury of fall, the association was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this retrospective, propensity matched cohort study using a national sample of trauma patients, attendance by ALS providers was associated with reduced mortality. This was observed in the entire cohort, in those aged > 50 years, and those with a higher-risk mechanism of injury. It approached significance in those with prolonged prehospital time.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142950668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of American College of surgeons trauma verification on statewide collaborative outcomes. 美国外科医师学会创伤鉴定对全州合作结果的影响。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004505
Eli Mlaver, Elizabeth V Atkins, Regina S Medeiros, Jyotirmay Sharma, Gina Solomon, Luke Galloway, Samual R Todd, James R Dunne, Dennis W Ashley

Background: American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma center verification has demonstrated improved outcomes at individual centers, but its impact on statewide Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Collaboratives is unknown. A statewide TQIP Collaborative, founded in 2011, noted underperformance in six of eight patient cohorts identified in the TQIP Collaborative report. We hypothesized that requiring ACS verification for level I and II trauma centers would result in improved outcomes for the state collaborative.

Methods: The ACS verification requirement was tied to ongoing Trauma Commission funding. Trauma centers were required to apply for an ACS consultative visit by 2017 and were given until 2023 to achieve ACS verification. The effect of this intervention was measured in the number of centers achieving verification and in the performance of the TQIP Collaborative semiannual reports.

Results: In 2015, only 1 of 15 (7%) trauma centers were ACS verified, and 4 had undergone consultative visits. By 2023, 11 of 12 (92%) trauma centers achieved ACS verification. Following this intervention, the observed-to-expected odds ratio for all-patient morbidity and mortality improved from 1.60 to 1.17, and variation among patient-specific cohorts narrowed from 0.97-1.82 to 0.96-1.48 (Figure 2). Performance in all six underperforming patient-specific cohorts improved over the study period.

Conclusion: ACS verification for level I and II trauma centers improves TQIP Collaborative performance. Statewide Collaboratives should consider ACS verification as a requirement for participation.

Level of evidence: Economic and Value-Based Evaluations, Level III.

背景:美国外科医师学会(ACS)创伤中心的验证表明,个别中心的结果有所改善,但其对州范围内创伤质量改善计划(TQIP)合作的影响尚不清楚。2011年成立的一个全州范围的TQIP协作组织指出,在TQIP协作报告中确定的8个患者队列中,有6个表现不佳。我们假设,要求一级和二级创伤中心进行ACS验证将改善国家合作的结果。方法:ACS的验证要求与创伤委员会正在进行的资助有关。创伤中心必须在2017年之前申请ACS咨询访问,并在2023年之前获得ACS认证。这种干预的效果是通过获得验证的中心数量和TQIP合作半年度报告的表现来衡量的。结果:2015年,15家创伤中心中只有1家(7%)被证实为ACS, 4家进行了咨询访问。到2023年,12个创伤中心中有11个(92%)达到了ACS认证。在此干预后,所有患者发病率和死亡率的观察到的与预期的比值比从1.60提高到1.17,患者特异性队列之间的差异从0.97-1.82缩小到0.96-1.48(图2)。在研究期间,所有六个表现不佳的患者特异性队列的表现都有所改善。结论:一级和二级创伤中心的ACS验证提高了TQIP协作绩效。全州协作组织应考虑将ACS验证作为参与的必要条件。证据等级:经济和基于价值的评估,三级。
{"title":"Impact of American College of surgeons trauma verification on statewide collaborative outcomes.","authors":"Eli Mlaver, Elizabeth V Atkins, Regina S Medeiros, Jyotirmay Sharma, Gina Solomon, Luke Galloway, Samual R Todd, James R Dunne, Dennis W Ashley","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004505","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004505","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma center verification has demonstrated improved outcomes at individual centers, but its impact on statewide Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Collaboratives is unknown. A statewide TQIP Collaborative, founded in 2011, noted underperformance in six of eight patient cohorts identified in the TQIP Collaborative report. We hypothesized that requiring ACS verification for level I and II trauma centers would result in improved outcomes for the state collaborative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ACS verification requirement was tied to ongoing Trauma Commission funding. Trauma centers were required to apply for an ACS consultative visit by 2017 and were given until 2023 to achieve ACS verification. The effect of this intervention was measured in the number of centers achieving verification and in the performance of the TQIP Collaborative semiannual reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2015, only 1 of 15 (7%) trauma centers were ACS verified, and 4 had undergone consultative visits. By 2023, 11 of 12 (92%) trauma centers achieved ACS verification. Following this intervention, the observed-to-expected odds ratio for all-patient morbidity and mortality improved from 1.60 to 1.17, and variation among patient-specific cohorts narrowed from 0.97-1.82 to 0.96-1.48 (Figure 2). Performance in all six underperforming patient-specific cohorts improved over the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACS verification for level I and II trauma centers improves TQIP Collaborative performance. Statewide Collaboratives should consider ACS verification as a requirement for participation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Economic and Value-Based Evaluations, Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142950669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inappropriate antithrombotic use in geriatric patients with complicated traumatic brain injury. 老年复杂外伤性脑损伤患者抗栓药物使用不当。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004552
Diwas Gautam, David Botros, Jackson Aubrey, Michael T Bounajem, Sarah Lombardo, Janet Cortez, Marta McCrum, Toby Enniss, Megan Puckett, Christian A Bowers, Sarah T Menacho, Ramesh Grandhi

Background: Preinjury antithrombotic (AT) use is associated with worse outcomes for geriatric (65 years or older) patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Previous studies have found that use of AT outside established guidelines is widespread in TBI patients.

Methods: In this single-center retrospective cross-sectional study, we examined inappropriate AT use among geriatric patients presenting with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. We reviewed records of patients 65 years or older with preinjury AT use who presented to a Level 1 trauma center with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage between 2016 and 2023. Patient demographics and AT indications/types were extracted. Appropriateness of AT use was determined using established guidelines.

Results: The cohort comprised 207 patients (56.5% male; median age, 77 years). Fall was the most common mechanism of injury (87.9%). At initial presentation, 87.0% of patients had mild TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale scores 13-15). The two most common indications for AT use were atrial fibrillation (41.5%) and venous thromboembolism (14.5%). Anticoagulation therapy was used by 51.7% of patients, antiplatelet therapy by 40.1%, and both by 8.2%. Prescribed AT agents included warfarin (23.2%), direct oral anticoagulants (36.2%), aspirin (32.4%), and clopidogrel (15.0%). Per clinical guidelines, 31 patients (15.0%) were determined to be inappropriately on AT therapy. On multivariable analysis, venous thromboembolism (odds ratio [OR], 5.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80-15.71; p = 0.002) and arterial stent (OR, 4.69; 95% CI, 1.53-14.37; p = 0.007) were associated with inappropriate AT use; aspirin was the most common inappropriately prescribed AT (OR, 3.59; 95% CI, 1.45-8.91; p = 0.006).

Conclusion: Overall, 15% of geriatric TBI patients with preinjury AT use were prescribed this therapy outside of current guidelines. Trauma providers should remain vigilant in identifying such patients and collaborate across multidisciplinary teams to implement interventions that minimize inappropriate AT use.

Level of evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiological Study; Level IV.

背景:损伤前抗血栓(AT)使用与老年(65岁或以上)创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者预后较差相关。先前的研究发现,在既定指南之外使用AT在TBI患者中很普遍。方法:在这项单中心回顾性横断面研究中,我们检查了外伤性颅内出血的老年患者不适当的AT使用。我们回顾了2016年至2023年期间在一级创伤中心就诊的65岁及以上的创伤前AT患者的记录。提取患者人口统计学和AT指征/类型。根据既定指南确定AT使用的适当性。结果:该队列共纳入207例患者(56.5%为男性;中位年龄,77岁)。跌倒是最常见的损伤机制(87.9%)。初次就诊时,87.0%的患者为轻度TBI(格拉斯哥昏迷评分13-15分)。心房颤动(41.5%)和静脉血栓栓塞(14.5%)是使用AT的两个最常见适应症。51.7%的患者使用抗凝治疗,40.1%的患者使用抗血小板治疗,8.2%的患者同时使用抗凝治疗。处方AT药物包括华法林(23.2%)、直接口服抗凝剂(36.2%)、阿司匹林(32.4%)和氯吡格雷(15.0%)。根据临床指南,31例患者(15.0%)被确定不适合AT治疗。在多变量分析中,静脉血栓栓塞(优势比[OR], 5.32;95%置信区间[CI], 1.80-15.71;p = 0.002)和动脉支架(OR, 4.69;95% ci, 1.53-14.37;p = 0.007)与AT使用不当相关;阿司匹林是最常见的不适当处方AT (OR, 3.59;95% ci, 1.45-8.91;P = 0.006)。结论:总体而言,15%的老年TBI患者在损伤前使用AT治疗,而不是目前的指南。创伤提供者应保持警惕,识别此类患者,并与多学科团队合作,实施干预措施,最大限度地减少不适当的AT使用。证据水平:预后和流行病学研究;IV级。
{"title":"Inappropriate antithrombotic use in geriatric patients with complicated traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Diwas Gautam, David Botros, Jackson Aubrey, Michael T Bounajem, Sarah Lombardo, Janet Cortez, Marta McCrum, Toby Enniss, Megan Puckett, Christian A Bowers, Sarah T Menacho, Ramesh Grandhi","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004552","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004552","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preinjury antithrombotic (AT) use is associated with worse outcomes for geriatric (65 years or older) patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Previous studies have found that use of AT outside established guidelines is widespread in TBI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective cross-sectional study, we examined inappropriate AT use among geriatric patients presenting with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. We reviewed records of patients 65 years or older with preinjury AT use who presented to a Level 1 trauma center with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage between 2016 and 2023. Patient demographics and AT indications/types were extracted. Appropriateness of AT use was determined using established guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort comprised 207 patients (56.5% male; median age, 77 years). Fall was the most common mechanism of injury (87.9%). At initial presentation, 87.0% of patients had mild TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale scores 13-15). The two most common indications for AT use were atrial fibrillation (41.5%) and venous thromboembolism (14.5%). Anticoagulation therapy was used by 51.7% of patients, antiplatelet therapy by 40.1%, and both by 8.2%. Prescribed AT agents included warfarin (23.2%), direct oral anticoagulants (36.2%), aspirin (32.4%), and clopidogrel (15.0%). Per clinical guidelines, 31 patients (15.0%) were determined to be inappropriately on AT therapy. On multivariable analysis, venous thromboembolism (odds ratio [OR], 5.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80-15.71; p = 0.002) and arterial stent (OR, 4.69; 95% CI, 1.53-14.37; p = 0.007) were associated with inappropriate AT use; aspirin was the most common inappropriately prescribed AT (OR, 3.59; 95% CI, 1.45-8.91; p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, 15% of geriatric TBI patients with preinjury AT use were prescribed this therapy outside of current guidelines. Trauma providers should remain vigilant in identifying such patients and collaborate across multidisciplinary teams to implement interventions that minimize inappropriate AT use.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic and Epidemiological Study; Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142932229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficient evacuation - enhanced survival: Insights from Gaza conflict trauma care. 有效的疏散-提高生存:加沙冲突创伤护理的见解。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004531
Itay Fogel, Snir Balziano, Michal Tunik, Dan Prat, Ran Barzilay, Nehemia Greenstein

Background: Combat-related injuries have evolved in urban warfare because of close-contact engagements and high-energy blast injuries, with rapid medical evacuation improving survival rates. This study analyzes injury patterns and outcomes in the Gaza conflict, emphasizing the need to optimize trauma care protocols in modern combat environments, particularly because of the unique proximity of conflict zones to tertiary trauma centers.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at a single center involving 189 patients evacuated by helicopter to a Level I tertiary trauma center. Subgroup analysis based on Injury Severity Scores was performed.

Results: Shrapnel impacts were the leading cause of injuries (58.7%), followed by blast injuries (48.1%) and gunshot wounds (30.7%). Extremity injuries were most common (61.4%), with 46.3% of patients needing surgery within 24 hours, mainly orthopedic procedures (75.3%). The average hospital stay was 21.9 days. In-hospital mortality rate was 4.2% (two patients). Infections occurred in 17.9% of cases, with fungal infections at 8.9% and bacterial infections at 15.3%.

Conclusion: In modern urban warfare, effective medical interventions play a crucial role in mitigating challenges. This study emphasizes the importance of rapid evacuation and advanced trauma management, reflected in low in-hospital mortality rates, highlighting the significance of timely interventions, personal protective equipment, specialized orthopedic trauma care, and robust infection control measures.

Level of evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

背景:在城市战争中,由于近距离接触和高能爆炸伤害,与战斗有关的伤害已经演变,快速医疗后送提高了生存率。本研究分析了加沙冲突中的伤害模式和结果,强调了在现代战斗环境中优化创伤护理方案的必要性,特别是因为冲突地区与三级创伤中心的独特距离。方法:回顾性研究在一个中心进行,涉及189名由直升机转移到一级三级创伤中心的患者。根据损伤严重程度评分进行亚组分析。结果:弹片冲击伤占58.7%,其次是爆炸伤(48.1%)和枪伤(30.7%)。四肢损伤最为常见(61.4%),46.3%的患者需要在24小时内进行手术,主要是骨科手术(75.3%)。平均住院时间为21.9天。住院死亡率为4.2%(2例)。感染占17.9%,真菌感染占8.9%,细菌感染占15.3%。结论:在现代城市战中,有效的医疗干预在缓解挑战方面发挥着至关重要的作用。这项研究强调了快速疏散和先进创伤管理的重要性,反映在低住院死亡率上,强调了及时干预、个人防护装备、专门的骨科创伤护理和强有力的感染控制措施的重要性。证据水平:预后和流行病学;第三层次。
{"title":"Efficient evacuation - enhanced survival: Insights from Gaza conflict trauma care.","authors":"Itay Fogel, Snir Balziano, Michal Tunik, Dan Prat, Ran Barzilay, Nehemia Greenstein","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004531","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004531","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Combat-related injuries have evolved in urban warfare because of close-contact engagements and high-energy blast injuries, with rapid medical evacuation improving survival rates. This study analyzes injury patterns and outcomes in the Gaza conflict, emphasizing the need to optimize trauma care protocols in modern combat environments, particularly because of the unique proximity of conflict zones to tertiary trauma centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted at a single center involving 189 patients evacuated by helicopter to a Level I tertiary trauma center. Subgroup analysis based on Injury Severity Scores was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Shrapnel impacts were the leading cause of injuries (58.7%), followed by blast injuries (48.1%) and gunshot wounds (30.7%). Extremity injuries were most common (61.4%), with 46.3% of patients needing surgery within 24 hours, mainly orthopedic procedures (75.3%). The average hospital stay was 21.9 days. In-hospital mortality rate was 4.2% (two patients). Infections occurred in 17.9% of cases, with fungal infections at 8.9% and bacterial infections at 15.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In modern urban warfare, effective medical interventions play a crucial role in mitigating challenges. This study emphasizes the importance of rapid evacuation and advanced trauma management, reflected in low in-hospital mortality rates, highlighting the significance of timely interventions, personal protective equipment, specialized orthopedic trauma care, and robust infection control measures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142932222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Automating excellence: A breakthrough in emergency general surgery quality benchmarking. 自动化卓越:急诊普外科质量标杆的突破。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004532
Louis A Perkins, Zongyang Mou, Jessica Masch, Brandon Harris, Amy E Liepert, Todd W Costantini, Laura N Haines, Allison Berndtson, Laura Adams, Jay J Doucet, Jarrett E Santorelli

Background: Given the high mortality and morbidity of emergency general surgery (EGS), designing and implementing effective quality assessment tools is imperative. Currently accepted EGS risk scores are limited by the need for manual extraction, which is time-intensive and costly. We developed an automated institutional electronic health record (EHR)-linked EGS registry that calculates a modified Emergency Surgery Score (mESS) and a modified Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) score and demonstrated their use in benchmarking outcomes.

Methods: The EHR-linked EGS registry was queried for patients undergoing emergent laparotomies from 2018 to 2023. Data captured included demographics, admission and discharge data, diagnoses, procedures, vitals, and laboratories. The mESS and modified POTTER (mPOTTER) were calculated based off previously defined variables, with estimation of subjective variables using diagnosis codes and other abstracted treatment variables. This was validated against ESS and the POTTER risk calculators by chart review. Observed versus expected (O:E) 30-day mortality and complication ratios were generated.

Results: The EGS registry captured 177 emergent laparotomies. There were 32 deaths (18%) and 79 complications (45%) within 30 days of surgery. For mortality, the mean difference between the mESS and ESS risk predictions for mortality was 3% (SD, 10%) with 86% of mESS predictions within 10% of ESS. The mean difference between the mPOTTER and POTTER was -2% (SD, 11%) with 76% of mPOTTER predictions within 10% of POTTER. Observed versus expected ratios by mESS and ESS were 1.45 and 1.86, respectively, and for mPOTTER and POTTER, they were 1.45 and 1.30, respectively. There was similarly good agreement between automated and manual risk scores in predicting complications.

Conclusion: Our study highlights the effective implementation of an institutional EHR-linked EGS registry equipped to generate automated quality metrics. This demonstrates potential in enhancing the standardization and assessment of EGS care while mitigating the need for extensive human resources investment.

Level of evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiologic Study; Level III.

背景:鉴于急诊普外科(EGS)的高死亡率和发病率,设计和实施有效的质量评估工具势在必行。目前接受的EGS风险评分受限于需要人工提取,这是耗时且昂贵的。我们开发了一个自动机构电子健康记录(EHR)链接的EGS注册表,计算修改后的急诊手术评分(mESS)和修改后的急诊手术风险预测最优树(POTTER)评分,并展示了它们在基准结果中的应用。方法:查询2018年至2023年急诊剖腹手术患者的ehr相关EGS登记。获取的数据包括人口统计、入院和出院数据、诊断、程序、生命体征和实验室。mESS和修改后的POTTER (mPOTTER)是基于先前定义的变量计算的,主观变量的估计使用诊断代码和其他抽象的治疗变量。通过图表回顾,对ESS和POTTER风险计算器进行了验证。观察到的与预期的(0:E) 30天死亡率和并发症比率。结果:EGS登记记录了177例急诊剖腹手术。术后30天内有32例死亡(18%)和79例并发症(45%)。对于死亡率,mESS和ESS对死亡率风险预测的平均差异为3%(标准差,10%),其中86%的mESS预测在ESS的10%以内。mPOTTER和POTTER之间的平均差异为-2% (SD, 11%),其中76%的mPOTTER预测在POTTER的10%以内。mESS和ESS的观察值和预期值分别为1.45和1.86,mPOTTER和POTTER的观察值和预期值分别为1.45和1.30。在预测并发症方面,自动化和人工风险评分之间也有类似的良好一致性。结论:我们的研究强调了与ehr相关的EGS注册系统的有效实施,该系统能够生成自动化的质量指标。这表明在加强EGS护理的标准化和评估方面具有潜力,同时减少了对大量人力资源投资的需求。证据水平:预后和流行病学研究;第三层次。
{"title":"Automating excellence: A breakthrough in emergency general surgery quality benchmarking.","authors":"Louis A Perkins, Zongyang Mou, Jessica Masch, Brandon Harris, Amy E Liepert, Todd W Costantini, Laura N Haines, Allison Berndtson, Laura Adams, Jay J Doucet, Jarrett E Santorelli","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004532","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004532","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the high mortality and morbidity of emergency general surgery (EGS), designing and implementing effective quality assessment tools is imperative. Currently accepted EGS risk scores are limited by the need for manual extraction, which is time-intensive and costly. We developed an automated institutional electronic health record (EHR)-linked EGS registry that calculates a modified Emergency Surgery Score (mESS) and a modified Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) score and demonstrated their use in benchmarking outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The EHR-linked EGS registry was queried for patients undergoing emergent laparotomies from 2018 to 2023. Data captured included demographics, admission and discharge data, diagnoses, procedures, vitals, and laboratories. The mESS and modified POTTER (mPOTTER) were calculated based off previously defined variables, with estimation of subjective variables using diagnosis codes and other abstracted treatment variables. This was validated against ESS and the POTTER risk calculators by chart review. Observed versus expected (O:E) 30-day mortality and complication ratios were generated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EGS registry captured 177 emergent laparotomies. There were 32 deaths (18%) and 79 complications (45%) within 30 days of surgery. For mortality, the mean difference between the mESS and ESS risk predictions for mortality was 3% (SD, 10%) with 86% of mESS predictions within 10% of ESS. The mean difference between the mPOTTER and POTTER was -2% (SD, 11%) with 76% of mPOTTER predictions within 10% of POTTER. Observed versus expected ratios by mESS and ESS were 1.45 and 1.86, respectively, and for mPOTTER and POTTER, they were 1.45 and 1.30, respectively. There was similarly good agreement between automated and manual risk scores in predicting complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights the effective implementation of an institutional EHR-linked EGS registry equipped to generate automated quality metrics. This demonstrates potential in enhancing the standardization and assessment of EGS care while mitigating the need for extensive human resources investment.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic and Epidemiologic Study; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142932207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1