Journal of Translational Medicine最新文献

Background: DNA mutations are the fundamental engines of cancer, driving its initiation and progression. The forces that fuel malignancy are also the architects of evolution, shaping life through genetic variations. Mutations, in fact, can emerge naturally from endogenous processes, such as oxidative DNA damage or errors in replication, as well as induced by external factors, including cosmic radiation and chemical carcinogens.

Main body: A key question in cancer research is whether tumor evolution is primarily governed by selective bottlenecks, neutral evolution, or dynamic genetic plasticity. In this work, we examine cancer as a disease driven by evolutionary processes rooted in fundamental biological requirements, including sustained proliferation and nutrient utilization. We hypothesize that the accumulation of mutations activates an evolutionary switch, enabling tumor cells to acquire an enhanced capacity for survival, adaptation, and growth at rates far exceeding typical evolutionary timescales. We propose the "evolutionary cascade hypothesis," a unifying framework that integrates these models into a coherent sequence. At its core lies the failure of DNA repair mechanisms, representing a critical transition in cancer progression. This shift marks the transition from an initial non-Darwinian, neutral phase to a Darwinian, more deterministic phase.

Conclusions: As predictive models of tumor evolution advance through genomic big data and artificial intelligence-driven analysis, the future of cancer treatment may extend beyond targeting individual mutations to disrupting the underlying evolutionary mechanisms that sustain malignancy. This paradigm shift could redefine therapeutic strategies and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Background: Bryant-Li-Bhoj neurodevelopmental syndrome (BLBS) is neurogenetic disorder caused by variants in H3-3A and H3-3B, the two genes that encode histone H3.3. Ninety-nine percent of individuals with BLBS show developmental delay/intellectual disability, but the mechanism by which variants in H3.3 result in these phenotypes is not yet understood, limiting the therapeutic interventions available to individuals living with BLBS.

Methods: Here, we investigate how one BLBS-causative variant, H3-3B p.Leu48Arg (L48R), affects neurodevelopment using an induced pluripotent stem cell model differentiated to 2D neural progenitor cells (NPCs), 2D forebrain neurons (FBNs), and 3D dorsal forebrain organoids (DFBOs). We employ a multi-omic approach in the 2D models to quantify the resulting changes in gene expression and chromatin accessibility. We used immunofluorescence (IF) staining to define the identities of cells in the 3D DFBOs and whole-cell patch clamp to investigate the electrophysiological properties of neurons in DFBOs.

Results: In the 2D systems, we found dysregulated gene expression and chromatin accessibility affecting neuronal fate, adhesion, neurotransmission, and excitatory/inhibitory balance. Immunofluorescence of DFBOs corroborated altered proportions of radial glia and mature neuronal populations. Patch clamp recordings revealed decreased electrical activity in neurons from L48R DFBOs compared to control DFBOs.

Conclusions: These data provide the first mechanistic insights into the pathogenesis of BLBS from a human-derived model of neurodevelopment, which suggest that H3.3 L48R increases H3-3B expression, resulting in the hyper-deposition of H3.3 into the nucleosome, which underlies changes in gene expression and chromatin accessibility. Functionally, this causes dysregulation of cell adhesion, neurotransmission, and the balance between excitatory and inhibitory signaling. These results are a crucial step towards preclinical development and testing of targeted therapies for this and related disorders.