Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network最新文献

Background: Parents experience a range of mental health disorders following their child's cancer diagnosis. It is thus essential to explore how the child's cancer diagnosis affects the dosage of psychotropic medication in both short- and long-term use, as well as potential disparities in utilization patterns between mothers and fathers.

Patients and methods: Using Swedish registers, we identified all parents whose children were diagnosed with cancer from July 2009 to December 2015 in Sweden. We randomly matched up to 5 parents of cancer-free children conditional on their baseline characteristics. All parents were followed up from 4 years before to 4 years after their child's diagnosis. Psychotropic medication cumulative defined daily doses (DDDs) were retrieved from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. Using interrupted time series analyses, we sought to investigate how childhood cancer diagnosis influences the evolving pattern of parental psychotropic medication dosage across time with consideration for potential differences compared with matched parents before the child's cancer diagnosis. We calculated the attributable proportion due to the diagnosis of childhood cancer.

Results: Following a child's cancer diagnosis, mothers experienced a steady increase in psychotropic medication use, averaging 4.9 DDDs per year compared with matched comparisons, with a 46.0% adjusted attributable proportion in the initial year. Fathers had an abrupt increase in psychotropic medication use in the first year after diagnosis, with an adjusted attributable proportion of 72.1%. Parents with lower education attainment tended to use more psychotropic medication.

Conclusions: In response to a child's cancer diagnosis, parents showed increased use of psychotropic medication compared with matched comparisons. Additionally, utilization patterns differed between mothers and fathers. Timely prevention and early support for parents are needed to alleviate their psychological challenges, potentially mitigating the strain on medical resources associated with increased psychotropic medication use.

Older patients with multiple myeloma (MM) exhibit wide heterogeneity in their baseline physiologic and functional status, which demands an individualized treatment approach based on biological rather than chronological age. Various frailty scores have been developed for older patients with MM, but they are underutilized in clinical trials and in practice. Older patients with MM are underrepresented in therapeutic clinical trials, and treatment recommendations are currently derived from clinical trials of transplant-ineligible patients. This article provides a summary of phase II and III clinical trials in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed MM, highlighting outcomes in patients aged ≥75 years and frailty-based outcomes. The data available thus far show that triplet regimens are more efficacious than doublets in older patients but may be associated with higher toxicity. DRd (daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone) and VRd (bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone) are good options in patients who are nonfrail, whereas dose-adjusted DRd and VRd-lite should be offered to frail patients. Frailty should be assessed regularly to guide treatment intensification and/or deescalation. It is important that frailty measures are incorporated in clinical trials evaluating novel treatments to inform how older and frail patients will benefit from these treatments.

Peripheral and deep en face margin assessment (PDEMA), formerly termed by NCCN as complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment (CCPDMA), has the advantages of histologic visualization of the entire marginal surface, highly accurate resection of involved tissue, and sparing of uninvolved tissue. Owing to its highest reported cure rates, PDEMA is the NCCN-preferred treatment for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, high-risk basal cell carcinoma, and very-high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In the United States, Mohs micrographic surgery (Mohs) is the most common method of PDEMA. In Germany and some other countries, non-Mohs methods of PDEMA referred to as the Tubingen torte and muffin techniques are more widely used. The Tubingen methods of PDEMA require close communication between surgeon and pathologist. This article describes the background of both Mohs and Tubingen PDEMA, reviews what constitutes PDEMA, and provides a protocol for Tubingen PDEMA detailing critical components in a stepwise fashion using illustrative photos and diagrams. We hope to broaden understanding of the NCCN Guidelines and their rationale, align practice, and optimize patient outcomes.

With the availability of BCR::ABL1 targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), outcomes for most individuals with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) are outstanding, with life expectancy similar to age-matched peers. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) impair quality of life and many patients struggle with low-level chronic AEs, which for some individuals impact emotional well-being as well as social and work functioning. An emerging body of data supports that many TEAEs are related to therapy dose and can improve with dose reduction. However, it is critical that dose reductions do not alter current outcomes, especially in the rare patients who are at greater risk of losing response or transforming to acute leukemia. Organizations including the National Comprehensive Cancer Network have begun to address when dose reductions may be considered in patients with CP-CML. In this manuscript, we review retrospective and prospective data reporting outcomes in patients after dose reduction and review data supporting lower dose preemptive dosing in first-line and later-line therapy. Switching therapy for intolerance can result in improvements in symptoms and limit toxicity, but other TEAEs may occur. Additionally, emerging therapeutics such as the new class of BCR::ABL1 allosteric inhibitors are under evaluation with a goal of improving tolerability. However, with many TKIs on the cusp of becoming generic, dose reduction becomes an appealing and important cost-effective strategy to minimize TEAEs and improve quality of life while preserving outstanding outcomes in CP-CML.

Background: Hormone receptor (HR)-negative, HER2-positive (also called HER2-enriched) breast cancer has no worse prognosis than other breast cancers if it is treated with HER2-targeted therapy. Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has been shown to be associated with improved access to care and outcomes for many cancers, but its association with receipt of care for HR-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer is unknown. We examined the association of Medicaid expansion with receipt of guideline-concordant treatment, time to treatment initiation, and survival among nonelderly women newly diagnosed with HR-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer.

Patients and methods: Women aged 18 to 62 years newly diagnosed with HR-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer between 2010 and 2018 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Outcomes included receipt of stage-based guideline-concordant treatment, timely initiation of treatment (<30 days, <60 days, <90 days from diagnosis), and stage-specific 2-year overall survival. A difference-in-differences (DID) analytic approach compared outcome changes following Medicaid expansion in expansion versus nonexpansion states. Multivariable linear probability models were used to estimate treatment outcomes, and flexible parametric survival models were used to evaluate survival, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical confounders.

Results: A total of 31,401 patients were included. Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase of 0.58 percentage points (ppt; 95% CI, 0.01-1.16) in receipt of guideline-concordant treatment overall, a 2.43-ppt (95% CI, 0.68-4.18) increase in initiating guideline-concordant treatment <60 days after diagnosis, and a 1.17-ppt (95% CI, 0.02-2.32) increase in 2-year survival rate. The increase in 2-year survival associated with Medicaid expansion was most prominent for patients with stage III disease (DID, 3.81; 95% CI, 0.82-6.80).

Conclusions: Medicaid expansion was associated with improved care and survival for patients with HR-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer, an aggressive cancer type for which prognosis largely depends on access to effective treatment.

Background: Patients with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) face unique challenges resulting in disparities in their health care. We sought to define the effect that IDD had on achievement of a "textbook outcome" (TO) following a cancer operation among a nationally representative cohort of patients.

Methods: Data on patients who underwent surgery for a malignant indication, including lung, breast, liver, biliary tract, pancreas, and colorectal, between 2014 and 2020 were extracted from the 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files database. The association of IDD with TO (defined as the absence of postoperative complications, extended length of stay, 90-day readmission, and 90-day mortality), expenditures, and discharge status was assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Among 500,472 Medicare beneficiaries, 4,326 (0.9%) with IDD had a cancer diagnosis (breast, n=481; lung, n=419; hepatobiliary, n=194; pancreas, n=145; colorectal, n=3,087). Although overall incidence of TO was 50.5%, patients with IDD were less likely to achieve a TO than those without (37.1% vs 50.6%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.46-0.53; P<.001). On multivariable regression, patients with IDD had higher odds of a postoperative complication (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.43-1.64), extended length of stay (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.93-2.21), 90-day readmission (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.24), 90-day mortality (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.70-2.13), and discharge to a skilled nursing facility (OR, 4.28; 95% CI, 3.97-4.62) (all P<.001).

Conclusions: Patients with IDD had a much lower chance of a postoperative TO, as well as discharge to a nonhome setting. The data highlight the need to improve the care of patients with IDD to assure equitable oncologic surgical care.

Peritoneal mesothelioma is an uncommon malignancy affecting approximately 300 new patients annually in the United States. Due to its low incidence, prospective clinical trials specific to this disease are scant. Recommendations regarding systemic therapy are mostly extrapolated from clinical trials conducted among patients with pleural mesothelioma. At present, the recommended first-line systemic treatment options may include immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy with pemetrexed plus either cisplatin or carboplatin. For second-line treatment, the other previously unchosen first-line option can be used. Off-label bevacizumab may be considered in combination with chemotherapy among carefully selected patients. The benefit of third-line treatment or beyond is less clear. Nonetheless, a number of single-agent regimens show modest activity. Anecdotal reports of children or young adults with peritoneal mesothelioma harboring ALK rearrangement have suggested the efficacy of ALK inhibitors for this rare population. In summary, there is a growing number of systemic therapy options for peritoneal mesothelioma. To gain a better insight into this disease, future prospective trials in mesothelioma should include more patients with peritoneal mesothelioma.

Background: Although the need to reduce the impact of financial toxicity among patients with cancer is widely acknowledged, few interventions have been developed to address this issue. We tested a novel, multiphase, patient-centered financial navigation (FN) intervention at a large academic medical center.

Methods: We developed a financial toxicity screening tool consisting of the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) measure plus several additional items based on patient feedback. After systematizing the screening process, 50 patients from the North Carolina Basnight Cancer Hospital were enrolled in the FN intervention following a positive screen for financial distress (COST score <23). The FN intervention involved one-on-one consultations with a trained financial navigator and included an initial comprehensive intake appointment to determine patient eligibility for financial assistance and follow-up appointments to discuss paperwork and application(s) status. We assessed preliminary intervention effectiveness (preintervention and postintervention COST scores) and implementation (ie, fidelity, uptake, acceptability).

Results: All 50 patients assessed for study eligibility screened positive for financial distress. A total of 46 patients completed both the preintervention and postintervention COST instrument and other measures. Postintervention mean COST scores improved from 6.4 at baseline to 13.3 post-FN (P<.0001), indicating a significant decrease in perceived financial toxicity. Fidelity to the intervention was high and 96% of participants received financial assistance.

Conclusions: A patient-centered FN intervention fully integrated into an existing care coordination model can help to decrease the burden of cancer-related financial toxicity among patients with cancer experiencing financial distress. Further studies are needed to test FN interventions in various oncology settings and among targeted populations.

Background: Cancer-related bone pain remains a prevalent and frequently incapacitating ailment. Although conventional approaches effectively alleviate pain in most individuals, a subset of patients may continue to experience intractable pain. Current recommendations for treating cancer-related bone pain include oral analgesics and multimodal adjuvants, radiation therapy, and, in selected cases, intrathecal therapy. Cancer-related bone pain is mediated by a proliferation of sensory and sympathetic fibers. Thus, we believe that this pain can be successfully managed with minimally invasive sympathetic blockade (SB).

Methods: In a retrospective observational cohort, we reviewed patients who underwent single-shot SB for uncontrolled cancer-related bone pain despite receiving opiate analgesics and other interventions. We documented the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) ratings, the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores, and the morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) before and after SB.

Results: The final cohort included 43 patients (median age, 58 years [range, 23-86 years]) with a history of bone pain experienced for a median of 6 months (IQR, 3-12 months). Comparing before and after the SB, patients had pain reduction -6 (IQR, -7 to -4; P<.001), reduction of ESAS scores of -17 (IQR, -23 to -3; P<.001), and reduction of MEDD -57 mg (95% CI, -79 to -34; P<.001). The treatment was well tolerated.

Conclusions: Blockade of sympathetic afferent innervation is an effective and cost-effective modality that can be safely used to palliate intractable pain in patients with malignant bone pain.