首页 > 最新文献

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network最新文献

英文 中文
Pilot Randomized Trial of an Educational Intervention About Immunotherapy for Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Caregivers.
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7079
Laura A Petrillo, Kelly Hsu, Kedie Pintro, Dustin J Rabideau, Ashley Z Zhou, Roshni Sarathy, An Tran, Ryan Sullivan, Kerry L Reynolds, Areej El-Jawahri, Angelo Volandes, Joseph A Greer, Jennifer S Temel

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used cancer drugs. We developed "UPLIFT," a video and question prompt list (QPL) intervention to educate patients about ICI risks and benefits.

Patients and methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of UPLIFT versus usual care among 130 adults initiating ICIs and caregivers. Dyads were randomized 1:1 to receive UPLIFT or usual care prior to ICI initiation. Participants completed surveys at enrollment, 72 hours, and 6 weeks post-ICI initiation. The primary outcomes were feasibility (≥70% enrollment of eligible patients and ≥80% of UPLIFT patients reviewing the video and QPL) and ICI knowledge (8 items, scored as % correct). We also assessed acceptability of UPLIFT (3 items), anxiety (6-item State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), and patient activation (number of questions asked in oncology visit). We used descriptive statistics, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), and negative binomial models.

Results: We enrolled 130 of 178 eligible patients (73%) and 56 caregivers. Patients (mean age, 67 years [range, 31-92]) had diagnoses of melanoma (41%), lung cancer (26%), or other cancers. All UPLIFT patients (100%) watched the video; 47% used the QPL. Nearly all patients (61/65; 94%) felt "somewhat" or "very comfortable" with UPLIFT. ICI knowledge improved among UPLIFT patients versus controls at 72 hours (difference in adjusted mean % correct at 72 hours, 9% [95% CI, 3%-16%]). The change in anxiety at 72 hours did not significantly differ and there was no difference in knowledge or anxiety change at 6 weeks across groups. UPLIFT patients asked more questions (ratio, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.97-1.66]).

Conclusions: A novel educational intervention about ICI risks and benefits was feasible to deliver, deemed acceptable, and shows promise in improving knowledge and activation to ask questions without increasing anxiety. A future study evaluating UPLIFT's efficacy in these and other outcomes, including severe ICI toxicity, is warranted.

{"title":"Pilot Randomized Trial of an Educational Intervention About Immunotherapy for Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Caregivers.","authors":"Laura A Petrillo, Kelly Hsu, Kedie Pintro, Dustin J Rabideau, Ashley Z Zhou, Roshni Sarathy, An Tran, Ryan Sullivan, Kerry L Reynolds, Areej El-Jawahri, Angelo Volandes, Joseph A Greer, Jennifer S Temel","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7079","DOIUrl":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used cancer drugs. We developed \"UPLIFT,\" a video and question prompt list (QPL) intervention to educate patients about ICI risks and benefits.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled trial of UPLIFT versus usual care among 130 adults initiating ICIs and caregivers. Dyads were randomized 1:1 to receive UPLIFT or usual care prior to ICI initiation. Participants completed surveys at enrollment, 72 hours, and 6 weeks post-ICI initiation. The primary outcomes were feasibility (≥70% enrollment of eligible patients and ≥80% of UPLIFT patients reviewing the video and QPL) and ICI knowledge (8 items, scored as % correct). We also assessed acceptability of UPLIFT (3 items), anxiety (6-item State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), and patient activation (number of questions asked in oncology visit). We used descriptive statistics, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), and negative binomial models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 130 of 178 eligible patients (73%) and 56 caregivers. Patients (mean age, 67 years [range, 31-92]) had diagnoses of melanoma (41%), lung cancer (26%), or other cancers. All UPLIFT patients (100%) watched the video; 47% used the QPL. Nearly all patients (61/65; 94%) felt \"somewhat\" or \"very comfortable\" with UPLIFT. ICI knowledge improved among UPLIFT patients versus controls at 72 hours (difference in adjusted mean % correct at 72 hours, 9% [95% CI, 3%-16%]). The change in anxiety at 72 hours did not significantly differ and there was no difference in knowledge or anxiety change at 6 weeks across groups. UPLIFT patients asked more questions (ratio, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.97-1.66]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A novel educational intervention about ICI risks and benefits was feasible to deliver, deemed acceptable, and shows promise in improving knowledge and activation to ask questions without increasing anxiety. A future study evaluating UPLIFT's efficacy in these and other outcomes, including severe ICI toxicity, is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"23 2","pages":"12-20"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143408992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unlocking the Potential: Antihistamine Use and Breast Cancer Risk in Women With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7077
Kang-Chuang Chai, Ta-Chun Chou, Wan-Ming Chen, Ben-Chang Shia, Ruey-Shyang Soong, Szu-Yuan Wu

Background: The association between the use of antihistamines targeting histamine receptor H1 (AH1) and breast cancer risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains understudied, warranting further investigation.

Methods: Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database from 2008 to 2018, we conducted a cohort study on women aged ≥18 years with T2DM, employing propensity score matching (PSM) to compare breast cancer risk between AH1 users (defined as at least 28 cumulative defined daily doses annually) and nonusers. Cox regression models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs).

Results: The baseline characteristics of the study population were assessed, with 142,642 women enrolled between 2008 and 2018. After PSM, the AH1 use and nonuse groups showed comparable variables. The aHR for breast cancer was significantly lower in the AH1 use group compared with the nonuse group (aHR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44-0.66; P<.0001). Dose-dependent analysis revealed a significant trend (Ptrend=.0002), indicating a lower breast cancer risk with increasing AH1 use. The incidence rate of breast cancer was lower in AH1 users compared with nonusers, with an incidence rate ratio of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65-0.93).

Conclusions: AH1 use shows promise in reducing breast cancer risk in individuals with T2DM, particularly with higher dosages, warranting further research and consideration by health care practitioners.

{"title":"Unlocking the Potential: Antihistamine Use and Breast Cancer Risk in Women With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.","authors":"Kang-Chuang Chai, Ta-Chun Chou, Wan-Ming Chen, Ben-Chang Shia, Ruey-Shyang Soong, Szu-Yuan Wu","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7077","DOIUrl":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between the use of antihistamines targeting histamine receptor H1 (AH1) and breast cancer risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains understudied, warranting further investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database from 2008 to 2018, we conducted a cohort study on women aged ≥18 years with T2DM, employing propensity score matching (PSM) to compare breast cancer risk between AH1 users (defined as at least 28 cumulative defined daily doses annually) and nonusers. Cox regression models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics of the study population were assessed, with 142,642 women enrolled between 2008 and 2018. After PSM, the AH1 use and nonuse groups showed comparable variables. The aHR for breast cancer was significantly lower in the AH1 use group compared with the nonuse group (aHR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44-0.66; P<.0001). Dose-dependent analysis revealed a significant trend (Ptrend=.0002), indicating a lower breast cancer risk with increasing AH1 use. The incidence rate of breast cancer was lower in AH1 users compared with nonusers, with an incidence rate ratio of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AH1 use shows promise in reducing breast cancer risk in individuals with T2DM, particularly with higher dosages, warranting further research and consideration by health care practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"23 2","pages":"34-40"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143408996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Serious Illness Conversations and Advance Care Planning: Can Machine-Learning or AI Really Help?
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2025.0008
Daniel M Geynisman
{"title":"Serious Illness Conversations and Advance Care Planning: Can Machine-Learning or AI Really Help?","authors":"Daniel M Geynisman","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2025.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2025.0008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"23 2","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143408994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 2.2025.
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2025.0007
A Dimitrios Colevas, Anthony J Cmelak, David G Pfister, Sharon Spencer, Douglas Adkins, Andrew C Birkeland, David M Brizel, Paul M Busse, Jimmy J Caudell, Greg Durm, Carole Fakhry, Thomas Galloway, Jessica L Geiger, Maura L Gillison, Christine Glastonbury, Robert I Haddad, Wesley L Hicks, Ying J Hitchcock, Antonio Jimeno, Aditya Juloori, Michael Kase, Debra Leizman, Ellie Maghami, Loren K Mell, Bharat B Mittal, Harlan A Pinto, Katharine Price, James W Rocco, Cristina P Rodriguez, David Schwartz, Jatin P Shah, David Sher, Maie St John, He Wang, Gregory Weinstein, Francis Worden, Justine Yang Bruce, Sue S Yom, Weining Zhen, Sarah Montgomery, Susan D Darlow

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses, as well as occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM). The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's most recent recommendations regarding management of nasopharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.

{"title":"NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 2.2025.","authors":"A Dimitrios Colevas, Anthony J Cmelak, David G Pfister, Sharon Spencer, Douglas Adkins, Andrew C Birkeland, David M Brizel, Paul M Busse, Jimmy J Caudell, Greg Durm, Carole Fakhry, Thomas Galloway, Jessica L Geiger, Maura L Gillison, Christine Glastonbury, Robert I Haddad, Wesley L Hicks, Ying J Hitchcock, Antonio Jimeno, Aditya Juloori, Michael Kase, Debra Leizman, Ellie Maghami, Loren K Mell, Bharat B Mittal, Harlan A Pinto, Katharine Price, James W Rocco, Cristina P Rodriguez, David Schwartz, Jatin P Shah, David Sher, Maie St John, He Wang, Gregory Weinstein, Francis Worden, Justine Yang Bruce, Sue S Yom, Weining Zhen, Sarah Montgomery, Susan D Darlow","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2025.0007","DOIUrl":"10.6004/jnccn.2025.0007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses, as well as occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM). The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's most recent recommendations regarding management of nasopharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"23 2","pages":"2-11"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143408990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Physical Activity and Dexamethasone for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Preliminary Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial. 身体活动和地塞米松治疗癌症相关疲劳:一项初步安慰剂对照、随机、双盲试验。
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7071
Sriram Yennurajalingam, Vicente Valero, Brandon G Smalgo, Michael J Overman, Aravind Dasari, Robert A Wolff, Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav, Carlos H Barcenas, Naifa L Busaidy, Bryan Fellman, Karen Basen-Engquist, Kenneth R Hess, Debasish Tripathy, Eduardo Bruera

Background: Physical activity (PA) and dexamethasone (Dex) when used independently have modest benefits for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in patients with advanced cancer. In this study we aimed to determine the feasibility (adherence, safety, and satisfaction) of combining PA with Dex versus PA with placebo (PBO) for CRF, and to explore the effects of PA+Dex and PA+PBO on CRF.

Patients and methods: In this phase II, randomized, double-blind controlled trial, eligible patients had advanced cancer and a CRF score of ≥4 on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) for fatigue (0-10 scale). Patients were randomized to standardized PA for 4 weeks with either 4 mg of Dex (PA+Dex arm) or PBO (PA+PBO arm) twice daily for the first 7 days. Changes in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) scores from baseline to days 8 and 29 were assessed. Other outcomes included change in quality-of-life scores.

Results: A total of 64 (89%) patients were evaluable. Adherence rates for study medication, resistance exercise, and aerobic exercise were 91% and 92% (P=.15), 83% and 70.6% (P=.35), and 82.9% and 78.3% (P=.73), respectively, in the PA+Dex and PA+PBO arms. The satisfaction rates for the PA+Dex and PA+PBO arms were 98% and 79%, respectively. Median (IQR) changes in FACIT-F scores at days 8 and 29 from baseline were 9 (2 to 16; P<.001) and 5.75 (0 to 12.5; P=.015) for the PA+Dex arm, respectively, and 3.5 (-2.1 to 10; P=.054) and 6.5 (2.5 to 15.5; P=.006) for the PA+PBO arm, respectively. We found a significant treatment effect in the PA+Dex arm using exploratory linear mixed model analysis, with treatment showing an improvement of 5.63 units for FACIT-F scores (95% CI, 1.74-9.52; P=.005). We found significant improvement in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Fatigue Short Form 7a (PROMIS-Fatigue SF-7a), and Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF) totals on days 8 and 29 in the PA+Dex arm. There was no significant difference in grade ≥3 adverse events between the arms (P=.36).

Conclusions: Our study found that the use of combination PA+Dex and PA+PBO for CRF was feasible and associated with high rates of satisfaction, adherence to medication and PA intervention, and tolerability. CRF improvement with PA+Dex was clinically significant at days 8 and 29. Further larger studies are justified.

Clinicaltrials: gov identifier: NCT03583255.

背景:单独使用体力活动(PA)和地塞米松(Dex)对晚期癌症患者的癌症相关疲劳(CRF)有一定的益处。在本研究中,我们旨在确定PA联合Dex与PA联合安慰剂(PBO)治疗CRF的可行性(依从性、安全性和满意度),并探讨PA+Dex和PA+PBO对CRF的影响。患者和方法:在这项II期随机、双盲对照试验中,符合条件的患者为晚期癌症患者,在埃德蒙顿症状评估量表(ESAS)中疲劳的CRF评分≥4(0-10分)。患者随机接受标准化PA治疗4周,前7天每天两次使用4mg右美托咪定(PA+右美托咪定组)或PBO (PA+PBO组)。评估慢性疾病治疗-疲劳功能评估(FACIT-F)评分从基线到第8天和第29天的变化。其他结果包括生活质量得分的变化。结果:64例(89%)患者可评估。在PA+Dex组和PA+PBO组中,研究用药、阻力运动和有氧运动的依从率分别为91%和92% (P= 0.15), 83%和70.6% (P= 0.35), 82.9%和78.3% (P= 0.73)。PA+Dex和PA+PBO组的满意率分别为98%和79%。FACIT-F评分在第8天和第29天较基线的中位(IQR)变化为9(2至16;结论:我们的研究发现,使用PA+Dex和PA+PBO联合治疗CRF是可行的,并且与高满意度、药物依从性和PA干预以及耐受性相关。PA+Dex在第8天和第29天的CRF改善具有临床意义。进一步更大规模的研究是合理的。临床试验:gov标识符:NCT03583255。
{"title":"Physical Activity and Dexamethasone for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Preliminary Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.","authors":"Sriram Yennurajalingam, Vicente Valero, Brandon G Smalgo, Michael J Overman, Aravind Dasari, Robert A Wolff, Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav, Carlos H Barcenas, Naifa L Busaidy, Bryan Fellman, Karen Basen-Engquist, Kenneth R Hess, Debasish Tripathy, Eduardo Bruera","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7071","DOIUrl":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity (PA) and dexamethasone (Dex) when used independently have modest benefits for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in patients with advanced cancer. In this study we aimed to determine the feasibility (adherence, safety, and satisfaction) of combining PA with Dex versus PA with placebo (PBO) for CRF, and to explore the effects of PA+Dex and PA+PBO on CRF.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this phase II, randomized, double-blind controlled trial, eligible patients had advanced cancer and a CRF score of ≥4 on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) for fatigue (0-10 scale). Patients were randomized to standardized PA for 4 weeks with either 4 mg of Dex (PA+Dex arm) or PBO (PA+PBO arm) twice daily for the first 7 days. Changes in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) scores from baseline to days 8 and 29 were assessed. Other outcomes included change in quality-of-life scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 (89%) patients were evaluable. Adherence rates for study medication, resistance exercise, and aerobic exercise were 91% and 92% (P=.15), 83% and 70.6% (P=.35), and 82.9% and 78.3% (P=.73), respectively, in the PA+Dex and PA+PBO arms. The satisfaction rates for the PA+Dex and PA+PBO arms were 98% and 79%, respectively. Median (IQR) changes in FACIT-F scores at days 8 and 29 from baseline were 9 (2 to 16; P<.001) and 5.75 (0 to 12.5; P=.015) for the PA+Dex arm, respectively, and 3.5 (-2.1 to 10; P=.054) and 6.5 (2.5 to 15.5; P=.006) for the PA+PBO arm, respectively. We found a significant treatment effect in the PA+Dex arm using exploratory linear mixed model analysis, with treatment showing an improvement of 5.63 units for FACIT-F scores (95% CI, 1.74-9.52; P=.005). We found significant improvement in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Fatigue Short Form 7a (PROMIS-Fatigue SF-7a), and Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF) totals on days 8 and 29 in the PA+Dex arm. There was no significant difference in grade ≥3 adverse events between the arms (P=.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that the use of combination PA+Dex and PA+PBO for CRF was feasible and associated with high rates of satisfaction, adherence to medication and PA intervention, and tolerability. CRF improvement with PA+Dex was clinically significant at days 8 and 29. Further larger studies are justified.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov identifier: NCT03583255.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142950743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Prognostic Role of HPV or p16INK4a Status in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis. HPV或p16INK4a在阴茎鳞状细胞癌中的预后作用:一项荟萃分析
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7078
Arfa Mustasam, Kevin Parza, Filip Ionescu, Keerthi Gullapalli, Mahati Paravathaneni, Youngchul Kim, Reagan E Sandstrom, Majd Al Assaad, G Daniel Grass, Peter Johnstone, Steven Eschrich, Houssein Safa, Juskaran Chadha, Gabriel Roman Souza, Jerel David, Adele Semaan, Niki M Zacharias, Curtis Pettaway, Anna R Giuliano, Philippe E Spiess, Jad Chahoud

Background: HPV infection is implicated in approximately half of global penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) cases. Previous studies on HPV DNA and p16INK4a status in PSCC have yielded inconclusive prognostic findings. This meta-analysis aims to elucidate the prognostic role of HPV in PSCC by pooling data on disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS).

Methods: We systematically searched Medline and Embase up to January 2023 for relevant human studies. Data from eligible publications reporting HPV DNA or p16INK4a status, along with and DFS, DSS, or OS outcomes, were extracted. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to synthesize data, with study weights based on size and significance. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019131355).

Results: Out of 544 studies screened, 34 publications were included, comprising a pooled sample size of 3,944 patients. p16INK4a-positive status was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.75; I2=31%), DFS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.94; I2=20%), and DSS (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.23-0.50; I2=18%). HPV DNA positivity was significantly associated with improved DFS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.87; I2=13%) and DSS (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29-0.75; I2=47%) but not OS (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74-1.11; I2=0%).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis, comprising the largest number of patients with PSCC to date, shows a notable correlation between p16INK4a immunohistochemistry positivity and survival outcomes. These findings support the understanding that penile cancer cases not associated with HPV tend to behave more aggressively. We support p16INK4a immunohistochemistry testing as part of the initial diagnostic evaluation of patients with PSCC.

背景:HPV感染与全球大约一半的阴茎鳞状细胞癌(PSCC)病例有关。先前对PSCC中HPV DNA和p16INK4a状态的研究没有得出确定的预后结果。本荟萃分析旨在通过汇总无病生存期(DFS)、疾病特异性生存期(DSS)和总生存期(OS)的数据来阐明HPV在PSCC中的预后作用。方法:我们系统地检索Medline和Embase到2023年1月的相关人体研究。从符合条件的报告HPV DNA或p16INK4a状态的出版物中提取数据,以及DFS、DSS或OS结果。采用随机效应荟萃分析模型对数据进行综合,根据研究规模和显著性确定研究权重。研究方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42019131355)。结果:在筛选的544项研究中,包括34篇出版物,包括3,944例患者的汇总样本量。p16ink4a阳性状态与OS改善相关(风险比[HR], 0.54;95% ci, 0.39-0.75;I2=31%), DFS (hr, 0.52;95% ci, 0.29-0.94;I2=20%), DSS (HR, 0.34;95% ci, 0.23-0.50;I2 = 18%)。HPV DNA阳性与DFS改善显著相关(HR, 0.63;95% ci, 0.46-0.87;I2=13%)和DSS (HR, 0.46;95% ci, 0.29-0.75;I2=47%),但OS无差异(HR, 0.92;95% ci, 0.74-1.11;I2 = 0%)。结论:这项荟萃分析包括迄今为止最多的PSCC患者,显示p16INK4a免疫组化阳性与生存结果之间存在显著相关性。这些发现支持了一种理解,即与HPV无关的阴茎癌病例往往表现得更有攻击性。我们支持p16INK4a免疫组织化学检测作为PSCC患者初始诊断评估的一部分。
{"title":"The Prognostic Role of HPV or p16INK4a Status in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Arfa Mustasam, Kevin Parza, Filip Ionescu, Keerthi Gullapalli, Mahati Paravathaneni, Youngchul Kim, Reagan E Sandstrom, Majd Al Assaad, G Daniel Grass, Peter Johnstone, Steven Eschrich, Houssein Safa, Juskaran Chadha, Gabriel Roman Souza, Jerel David, Adele Semaan, Niki M Zacharias, Curtis Pettaway, Anna R Giuliano, Philippe E Spiess, Jad Chahoud","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7078","DOIUrl":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7078","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>HPV infection is implicated in approximately half of global penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) cases. Previous studies on HPV DNA and p16INK4a status in PSCC have yielded inconclusive prognostic findings. This meta-analysis aims to elucidate the prognostic role of HPV in PSCC by pooling data on disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched Medline and Embase up to January 2023 for relevant human studies. Data from eligible publications reporting HPV DNA or p16INK4a status, along with and DFS, DSS, or OS outcomes, were extracted. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to synthesize data, with study weights based on size and significance. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019131355).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 544 studies screened, 34 publications were included, comprising a pooled sample size of 3,944 patients. p16INK4a-positive status was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.75; I2=31%), DFS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.94; I2=20%), and DSS (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.23-0.50; I2=18%). HPV DNA positivity was significantly associated with improved DFS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.87; I2=13%) and DSS (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29-0.75; I2=47%) but not OS (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74-1.11; I2=0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis, comprising the largest number of patients with PSCC to date, shows a notable correlation between p16INK4a immunohistochemistry positivity and survival outcomes. These findings support the understanding that penile cancer cases not associated with HPV tend to behave more aggressively. We support p16INK4a immunohistochemistry testing as part of the initial diagnostic evaluation of patients with PSCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142927172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of KRAS Inhibitors and Their Role for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. KRAS抑制剂的发展及其在转移性结直肠癌中的作用。
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7067
Dustin A Deming

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous group of diseases comprising several molecular subtypes. Comprehensive DNA sequencing is now standard practice to identify these subtype. Until recently, KRAS mutation status in metastatic CRC was primarily used as a biomarker to predict resistance to EGFR inhibition. However, with up to 40% of CRC cases harboring KRAS mutations, therapeutic targeting of RAS has been an area of great need. The development of KRASG12C inhibitors has led to the FDA approval of drugs for treating non-small cell lung cancer. Recently, these and other newly developed inhibitors have been investigated as monotherapies and in combination for metastatic KRASG12C-mutant CRC. This review examines the development of these inhibitors and highlights data supporting the inclusion of sotorasib and adagrasib, in combination with either panitumumab or cetuximab, in the NCCN Guidelines for CRC for the treatment of refractory metastatic disease.

结直肠癌(CRC)是一种异质性疾病,包括几种分子亚型。全面的DNA测序现在是鉴定这些亚型的标准做法。直到最近,转移性结直肠癌的KRAS突变状态主要被用作预测对EGFR抑制的耐药性的生物标志物。然而,由于高达40%的CRC病例携带KRAS突变,因此RAS的靶向治疗一直是一个非常需要的领域。KRASG12C抑制剂的开发已导致FDA批准用于治疗非小细胞肺癌的药物。最近,这些和其他新开发的抑制剂已被研究用于转移性krasg12c突变型CRC的单一治疗和联合治疗。本综述研究了这些抑制剂的发展,并强调了支持将sotorasib和adagrasib与帕尼单抗或西妥昔单抗联合用于治疗难治性转移性CRC的NCCN指南中的数据。
{"title":"Development of KRAS Inhibitors and Their Role for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Dustin A Deming","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7067","DOIUrl":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7067","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous group of diseases comprising several molecular subtypes. Comprehensive DNA sequencing is now standard practice to identify these subtype. Until recently, KRAS mutation status in metastatic CRC was primarily used as a biomarker to predict resistance to EGFR inhibition. However, with up to 40% of CRC cases harboring KRAS mutations, therapeutic targeting of RAS has been an area of great need. The development of KRASG12C inhibitors has led to the FDA approval of drugs for treating non-small cell lung cancer. Recently, these and other newly developed inhibitors have been investigated as monotherapies and in combination for metastatic KRASG12C-mutant CRC. This review examines the development of these inhibitors and highlights data supporting the inclusion of sotorasib and adagrasib, in combination with either panitumumab or cetuximab, in the NCCN Guidelines for CRC for the treatment of refractory metastatic disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142927167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Lung Cancer Screening, Version 1.2025. NCCN指南®见解:肺癌筛查,版本1.2025。
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2025.0002
Douglas E Wood, Ella A Kazerooni, Denise R Aberle, Christine Argento, Jonathan Baines, Brian Boer, Lisa M Brown, Jessica Donington, Georgie A Eapen, J Scott Ferguson, Lifang Hou, Donald Klippenstein, Ana S Kolansky, Rohit Kumar, Lorriana E Leard, Ann N C Leung, Peter Mazzone, Robert E Merritt, Kim Norris, Mark Onaitis, Sudhakar Pipavath, Varun Puri, Dan Raz, Chakravarthy Reddy, Mary E Reid, Kim L Sandler, Jacob Sands, Matthew B Schabath, Catherine R Sears, Jamie L Studts, Lynn Tanoue, Amber L Thacker, Betty C Tong, William D Travis, Benjamin Wei, Kenneth Westover, Beth McCullough, Swathi Ramakrishnan

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Lung Cancer Screening provide criteria for selecting individuals for screening and offer recommendations for evaluating and managing lung nodules detected during initial and subsequent annual screening. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Lung Cancer Screening.

NCCN肿瘤学临床实践指南(NCCN指南)肺癌筛查提供了筛查个体的选择标准,并提供了评估和管理在初始和随后的年度筛查中发现的肺结节的建议。这些NCCN指南见解侧重于NCCN肺癌筛查指南的最新更新。
{"title":"NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Lung Cancer Screening, Version 1.2025.","authors":"Douglas E Wood, Ella A Kazerooni, Denise R Aberle, Christine Argento, Jonathan Baines, Brian Boer, Lisa M Brown, Jessica Donington, Georgie A Eapen, J Scott Ferguson, Lifang Hou, Donald Klippenstein, Ana S Kolansky, Rohit Kumar, Lorriana E Leard, Ann N C Leung, Peter Mazzone, Robert E Merritt, Kim Norris, Mark Onaitis, Sudhakar Pipavath, Varun Puri, Dan Raz, Chakravarthy Reddy, Mary E Reid, Kim L Sandler, Jacob Sands, Matthew B Schabath, Catherine R Sears, Jamie L Studts, Lynn Tanoue, Amber L Thacker, Betty C Tong, William D Travis, Benjamin Wei, Kenneth Westover, Beth McCullough, Swathi Ramakrishnan","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2025.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2025.0002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Lung Cancer Screening provide criteria for selecting individuals for screening and offer recommendations for evaluating and managing lung nodules detected during initial and subsequent annual screening. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Lung Cancer Screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes for JNCCN in 2025. 2025年JNCCN的变化。
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2025.0003
Daniel M Geynisman
{"title":"Changes for JNCCN in 2025.","authors":"Daniel M Geynisman","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2025.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2025.0003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans, Version 1.2025, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology. 皮肤纤维肉瘤隆突,版本1.2025,NCCN临床实践指南在肿瘤学。
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2025.0001
Jeremy Bordeaux, Rachel Blitzblau, Sumaira Z Aasi, Murad Alam, Arya Amini, Kristin Bibee, Diana Bolotin, Pei-Ling Chen, Carlo M Contreras, Dominick DiMaio, Jessica M Donigan, Jeffrey M Farma, Karthik Ghosh, Kelly Harms, Nicole LeBoeuf, John Nicholas Lukens, Susan Manber, Lawrence Mark, Theresa Medina, Kishwer S Nehal, Paul Nghiem, Kelly Olino, Gyorgy Paragh, Soo Park, Tejesh Patel, Jason Rich, Ashok R Shaha, Bhavina Sharma, Yemi Sokumbi, Divya Srivastava, Valencia Thomas, Courtney Tomblinson, Puja Venkat, Yaohui Gloria Xu, Siegrid Yu, Mehran Yusuf, Beth McCullough, Sara Espinosa

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare cutaneous soft tissue sarcoma and affects an estimated 1,500 people annually in the United States. DFSP frequently exhibits extensive local infiltration. Initial treatment is through surgical excision, and care should be taken to ensure that negative margins are achieved to minimize recurrence. Although DFSP has a reported high rate of recurrence, metastasis is more uncommon. Fibrosarcomatous DFSP is an aggressive variant with an increased risk for local recurrence and metastasis. If achieving negative margins or resection is not feasible, radiation therapy or systemic treatment are options that may be considered by a multidisciplinary team. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) outline recommended treatment options available for DFSP.

隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤(DFSP)是一种罕见的皮肤软组织肉瘤,在美国每年约有1500人受到影响。DFSP经常表现为广泛的局部浸润。最初的治疗是通过手术切除,并应注意确保达到阴性边缘,以尽量减少复发。虽然DFSP有高复发率的报道,但转移更罕见。纤维肉瘤DFSP是一种侵袭性变异体,局部复发和转移的风险增加。如果不能实现阴性切缘或切除,多学科团队可以考虑选择放射治疗或全身治疗。NCCN肿瘤学临床实践指南(NCCN指南)概述了DFSP可用的推荐治疗方案。
{"title":"Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans, Version 1.2025, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology.","authors":"Jeremy Bordeaux, Rachel Blitzblau, Sumaira Z Aasi, Murad Alam, Arya Amini, Kristin Bibee, Diana Bolotin, Pei-Ling Chen, Carlo M Contreras, Dominick DiMaio, Jessica M Donigan, Jeffrey M Farma, Karthik Ghosh, Kelly Harms, Nicole LeBoeuf, John Nicholas Lukens, Susan Manber, Lawrence Mark, Theresa Medina, Kishwer S Nehal, Paul Nghiem, Kelly Olino, Gyorgy Paragh, Soo Park, Tejesh Patel, Jason Rich, Ashok R Shaha, Bhavina Sharma, Yemi Sokumbi, Divya Srivastava, Valencia Thomas, Courtney Tomblinson, Puja Venkat, Yaohui Gloria Xu, Siegrid Yu, Mehran Yusuf, Beth McCullough, Sara Espinosa","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2025.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2025.0001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare cutaneous soft tissue sarcoma and affects an estimated 1,500 people annually in the United States. DFSP frequently exhibits extensive local infiltration. Initial treatment is through surgical excision, and care should be taken to ensure that negative margins are achieved to minimize recurrence. Although DFSP has a reported high rate of recurrence, metastasis is more uncommon. Fibrosarcomatous DFSP is an aggressive variant with an increased risk for local recurrence and metastasis. If achieving negative margins or resection is not feasible, radiation therapy or systemic treatment are options that may be considered by a multidisciplinary team. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) outline recommended treatment options available for DFSP.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1