Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network最新文献

The NCCN Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening describe various colorectal screening modalities as well as recommended screening schedules for patients at average or increased risk of developing sporadic CRC. They are intended to aid physicians with clinical decision-making regarding CRC screening for patients without defined genetic syndromes. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on select recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines, including a section on primary and secondary CRC prevention, and provide context for the panel's recommendations regarding the age at which to initiate screening in average-risk individuals and those with increased risk based on personal history of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer.

The NCCN Guidelines for Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolic Disease provide strategies for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adult patients with cancer. VTE is a common and life-threatening condition in patients with cancer, and its management often requires multidisciplinary efforts. The NCCN panel is comprised of specialists spanning various fields, including cardiology, hematology, medical oncology, internal medicine, interventional radiology, and pharmacology. The content featured in this issue specifically addresses the evaluation and recommended treatment options outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diverse subtypes of cancer-associated VTE.

Background: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer have historically been understudied. Few studies have examined survival disparities associated with racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status (SES) and do not account for the influence of insurance status and access to care. We evaluated the association of SES and race/ethnicity with overall mortality for AYA patients who were members of an integrated health system with relatively equal access to care.

Methods: AYA patients diagnosed with the 15 most common cancer types during 2010 through 2018 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California were included. Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI) quartile (Q1: least deprived; Q4: most deprived) was used as a measure of SES. Mortality rate per 1,000 person-years was calculated for each racial/ethnic and NDI subgroup. Multivariable Cox model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality adjusting for sex, age and stage at diagnosis, cancer type, race/ethnicity, and NDI.

Results: Data for 6,379 patients were tracked for a maximum of 10 years. Crude mortality rates were higher among non-White racial/ethnic patients compared with non-Hispanic (NH)-White patients. In the Cox model, Hispanic (HR, 1.31; P=.004) and NH-Black (HR, 1.34; P=.05) patients experienced significantly higher all-cause mortality risk compared with NH-White patients. Patients from more deprived neighborhoods had higher mortality risk. In the Cox model, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between Q1 and Q2 through Q4 (Q2: HR, 0.88; P=.26, Q3: HR, 0.94; P=.56, and Q4: HR, 0.95; P=.70).

Conclusions: For AYAs with cancer with similar access to care, Hispanic and NH-Black patients have higher risk of all-cause mortality than NH-White patients, whereas no significant SES-associated survival disparities were observed. These findings warrant further investigation, awareness, and intervention to address inequities in cancer care among vulnerable populations.

Tissue-agnostic, molecularly targeted therapies are becoming increasingly common in cancer treatment. The molecular drivers of some classes and subclasses of tumors are rapidly being uncovered in an era of deep tumor sequencing occurring at the time of diagnosis. When and how targeted therapies should fit within up-front cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiation paradigms is yet to be determined, because many of them have been studied in single-arm studies in patients with relapsed or refractory cancer. Infant high-grade gliomas (HGGs) are biologically and clinically distinct from older child and adult HGGs, and are divided into 3 molecular subgroups. Group 1 infant HGGs are driven by receptor tyrosine kinase fusions, most commonly harboring an ALK, ROS1, NTRK, or MET fusion. Both larotrectinib and entrectinib are tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors with tissue-agnostic approvals for the treatment of patients with solid tumors harboring an NTRK fusion. This report discusses an 11-month-old female who presented with infantile spasms, found to have an unresectable, NTRK fusion-positive infant HGG. Larotrectinib was prescribed when the NTRK fusion was identified at diagnosis, and without additional intervention to date, the patient has continued with stable disease for >3 years. The only adverse event experienced was grade 1 aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase elevations. The patient has a normal neurologic examination, is developing age-appropriately in all domains (gross motor, fine motor, cognitive, language, and social-emotional). She is no longer on antiseizure medications. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient with an infantile HGG receiving targeted therapy as first-line treatment with prolonged stable disease. A prospective study of larotrectinib in patients with newly diagnosed infant HGG is ongoing, and will hopefully help answer questions about durability of response, the need for additional therapies, and long-term toxicities seen with TRK inhibitors.

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a B-cell lymphoma characterized by the presence of bone marrow lymphoplasmacytic infiltration and circulating monoclonal immunoglobulin M protein. The clinical presentation of WM is variable, ranging from gradually progressive cytopenias, organomegaly, fatigue, B symptoms, and peripheral neuropathy to the more emergent presentation with symptomatic hyperviscosity, cryoglobulinemia, hemolytic anemia-associated symptoms, acquired von Willebrand disease or acquired hemophilia-associated bleeding. Approximately 1 in 5 patients with WM are asymptomatic at diagnosis and classified as having smoldering WM, not requiring WM-directed therapy. Although WM typically has an indolent, relapsing-remitting course, the outcomes are heterogeneous. The prognosis of patients with WM is known to be impacted by certain clinical and laboratory features at initial presentation, with advanced age, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase, and low serum albumin unfavorably affecting the outcome. Although complications such as histologic transformation or light and/or heavy chain (AL/ALH) amyloidosis are infrequent, their occurrence adversely influences the disease course. The International Prognostic Staging System for WM (IPSS-WM) is a validated model, often used in clinical practice, but needs to be reexamined in the current era. The discovery of the recurrent MYD88L265P gain-of-function point mutation and the subclonal CXCR4 mutations has helped improve our understanding of the WM biology, and the prognostic impact of these mutations is under evaluation, with somewhat inconsistent findings thus far across studies. This review discusses the clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, and prognostic markers of WM.

Background: The Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years (CTS5) is a risk stratification tool used to determine the risk of late recurrence in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative breast cancer (BC). Limited data exist on its use in HR+, HER2-positive (HER2+) BC.

Patients and methods: CTS5 was evaluated in HR+, HER2+ BC in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831 (Alliance) and NSABP B-31 (NRG) trials.

Results: A total of 1,862 patients with HR+, HER2+ BC without recurrence 5 years after enrollment were included. Overall, the CTS5 score was significantly associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.35 (95% CI, 1.12-1.63; P=.002), but did not reach statistical significance in patients who received trastuzumab (n=829; HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.98-1.71; P=.07). CTS5 risk category was not significantly associated with RFS. In patients who received trastuzumab, other variables used in CTS5, including patient age and tumor size, were not significantly associated with RFS. N3 was significantly associated with worse outcomes (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.09-3.17; P=.02) compared with N0-N1. Paradoxically, higher tumor grade was associated with better outcomes after 5 years in the multivariate analysis (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50-1.00; P=.05). The incidence of recurrences or deaths between years 5 to 10 was 10.6% in the CTS5 low-risk category, 5.6% in the intermediate-risk category, and 9.8% in the high-risk category.

Conclusions: The CTS5 model does not accurately predict the risk of late recurrence in HR+, HER2+ BC treated with adjuvant trastuzumab in the N9831 and B-31 trials. This study underlines the need to develop a new prognostic model to better delineate the risk of late recurrence in patients with HR+, HER2+ BC receiving adjuvant trastuzumab.

Clinicaltrials: gov identifiers: NCT00005970 (NCCTG N9831) and NCT00004067 (NRG/NSABP B-31).