Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis最新文献

When selecting an anticoagulant, clinicians consider individual patient characteristic, the treatment indication, drug pharmacology, and safety and efficacy as demonstrated in randomized trials. An ideal anticoagulant prevents thrombosis with little or no increase in bleeding. Direct oral anticoagulants represent a major advance over traditional anticoagulants (e.g., unfractionated heparin, warfarin) but still cause bleeding, particularly from the gastrointestinal tract which can limit their use. Epidemiological studies indicate that patients with congenital factor XI (FXI) deficiency have a lower risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and ischemic stroke (IS) than non-deficient individuals, and do not have an increased risk of spontaneous bleeding, even with severe deficiency. These observations provide the rationale for targeting FXI as a new class of anticoagulant. Multiple FXI inhibitors have been introduced and several are being evaluated in Phase III trials. In this review, we explain why drugs that target FXI may be associated with a lower risk of bleeding than currently available anticoagulants and summarize the completed and ongoing trials.

Real-world data on venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Japanese patients with gynecological cancer are lacking. The GOTIC-VTE trial aimed to evaluate the frequency of VTE-associated events and risk factors at the time of cancer diagnosis and during 1-year follow-up. From July 2017 to February 2019, patients with endometrial, cervical, ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer who underwent VTE screening within 2 months before registration, were enrolled. Of the 1008 patients enrolled, 881 were included in the analysis set, 51 (5.8%) had VTE at the time of cancer diagnosis (baseline), 7 (0.8%) had symptomatic VTE, and the majority had asymptomatic VTE (n = 44; 5.0%). Patients with ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer had a higher incidence of VTE (13.7%) than those with other cancer types. During the 1-year follow-up, 0.9% (n = 8) of the patients had symptomatic VTE, 3.5% (n = 31) had composite VTE (symptomatic VTE and incidental VTE requiring treatment), 0.2% (n = 2) had bleeding events, and 4.3% (n = 38) had all-cause death, all of which were significantly higher in the VTE group at baseline. In the multivariate analysis, chemotherapy was an independent risk factor for composite VTE during the 1-year follow-up (hazard ratio 3.85, 95% confidence interval 1.39-13.63, p = 0.018). Among gynecological cancers, VTE incidence is particularly high in ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer, and patients undergoing chemotherapy should be cautioned against VTE occurrence during treatment.The GOTIC-VTE trial Unique identifier, jRCTs031180124; Registration date, April 06, 2017.

While the association between coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) and neutrophils extracellular traps (NETs) is recognized, uncertainties remain regarding its precise onset, timing of resolution and target therapy. To assess changes in inflammatory and NET markers during the first week of COVID-19 hospitalization, and the association with disease severity. "In vitro" experiments investigated the effect of antiplatelets, anticoagulants, and cyclic nucleotide stimulators on NETs release. Prospective cohort study, changes in interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-17, TNF-α, RANTES, PF4, and citrullinated-H3 (citH3) levels within each outcome group was evaluated using ANOVA. Differences between moderately ill, critically ill, and non-survivors were determined using Kruskal-Wallis and logistic regression. Healthy neutrophils were stimulated with phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) or COVID-19 sera and treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), aspirin (ASA), ticagrelor, cinaciguat, sildenafil, and milrinone. The proportion of NETosis was assessed using IncuCyte Cell Imager. Of the 125 patients, 40.8% had moderate COVID-19, 40.8% had critical COVID-19 but recovered, and 18.4% died. From admission to hospitalization day 8, IL-6 levels decreased in moderately and critically ill, but not in non-survivors, while citH3 levels increased in critically ill and non-survivors. IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels were associated with critical and fatal COVID-19. The release of NETs by neutrophils stimulated with PMA or COVID-19 sera was decreased in the presence of ASA, UFH, LMWH and cyclic nucleotide stimulators in a dose-dependent manner. In the first week of hospitalization, NET markers rose later than inflammatory markers in severe COVID-19 cases. Cyclic nucleotide stimulators, ASA and heparin may emerge as treatment approaches as they may modulate NETosis.

BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) pose a substantial risk of thrombosis, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulant therapy, historically based on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), has limitations in preventing recurrent thrombotic events and managing bleeding complications. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offer a potential alternative with improved pharmacokinetics and compliance. However, evidence on DOAC efficacy and safety in MPNs remains limited, necessitating further investigation. In this multicenter retrospective study in Türkiye, we assessed real-world usage patterns and outcomes of DOACs in MPN patients. Data from 220 patients with PV, ET, or PMF receiving DOACs or VKAs for thrombosis or nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) were collected from medical records. Thrombotic events and bleeding episodes were documented based on ISTH criteria. DOACs were used in 126 patients as first-line anticoagulant therapy or following VKAs. Ninety-four patients were on VKAs, of which 83 as a first-line treatment. There were eight thromboses (6.3%) seen in 126 DOAC patients, and similarly, seven episodes (9.4%) of thrombosis were observed in 94 patients using VKA. Major bleeding occurred in seven patients (5.6%) on DOAC and 3 (3.2%) in VKA. Thrombotic and bleeding risks were comparable between DOACs and VKAs (p = 0.708 and p = 0.158, respectively). The incidence rate of thrombosis in the VKA group is 1.1% and in the DOAC group is 1.9%. The incidence of major bleeding in the VKA group is 0.6% and 1.6% in the DOAC group. To the best of our knowledge, our study included the largest number of MPN patients to date, comparing DOACs with VKA in terms of both efficacy and safety, which suggests DOACs as promising alternatives to VKAs for managing thrombotic risk in MPNs with manageable toxicity. Despite the limitations of retrospective studies, DOACs' benefits in terms of efficacy and compliance warrant further investigation through prospective trials. Individualized treatment decisions should consider patient-specific factors, emphasizing collaborative efforts between specialists to optimize DOAC therapy in patients with MPNs. Comparable efficacy and safety between DOACs and VKAs were observed in MPN patients.

Multiple agents exist for the reversal of oral Factor Xa inhibitor (FXa) associated bleeding, including Coagulation FXa Recombinant, Inactivated zhzo (andexanet alfa) and 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC). While classified as a 3F-PCC product, Profilnine contains up to 35 IU of Factor VII (per 100 IU of Factor IX) in addition to therapeutic levels of Factors II, IX, and X, and has demonstrated a similar impact on prothrombin time and blood product usage in non-warfarin related bleeding. This was a retrospective, multicenter study at four medical centers of adult patients who presented with major bleeding associated with oral FXa inhibitors and received either 4F-PCC (n = 64) or 3F-PCC (n = 61). The primary outcome was hemostatic effectiveness. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of thromboembolism, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. The most common indication for reversal was intracranial bleeding. For the primary outcome, 84% of all patients were rated as effective with no difference noted between the groups (p = 0.81). No significant difference between groups was found in the multivariable analysis adjusting for baseline differences between groups including race, total body weight, type of bleeding, and the use of antiplatelet therapy. There was no difference in the length of stay, in-hospital mortality, or the incidence of thromboembolism between the groups. Overall, no significant differences were found in the effectiveness or safety of 4F-PCC and 3F-PCC use in the management of oral FXa inhibitor-associated bleeding. Further investigations are warranted to explore the use of 3F-PCC for this indication and its safety and effectiveness.