Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis最新文献

Accurate risk stratification in acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is essential. Current prediction scores lack the ability to forecast impending clinical decline. The Pulmonary Embolism Progression (PEP) score aims to predict short-term clinical deterioration (respiratory failure or hemodynamic instability within 72 h) in patients with intermediate-risk PE. This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with intermediate PE. The outcome of interest was respiratory failure or hemodynamic instability within 72 h. A multivariate logistic regression identified five predictive variables for the final PEP score: use of > 4 L/min of supplemental oxygen above baseline, lactate > 2.0 mmol/L, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) > 40 ng/L, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) < 13 mm, and the combination of central and subsegmental clot. The derivation cohort included 117 patients, and the validation cohort included 70 patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve for the derivation cohort was 0.8671 (95% CI: 0.7946, 0.9292), and for the validation cohort, it was 0.9264 (95% CI: 0.8680, 0.9847). A PEP score of 4 points yielded the highest combination of sensitivity (93%) and specificity (65%). Each incremental point increase in the PEP score raised the probability of clinical deterioration by a factor of 1.933. The PEP score is a reliable tool for predicting the likelihood of clinical deterioration in intermediate-risk PE patients within 72 h, potentially aiding in timely clinical decision-making and improving patient outcomes.

Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL)-associated endothelial dysfunction is a critical factor in the initiation and progression of Atherosclerosis (AS). Annexin A1 is an important member of the annexin family. Despite its wide range of biological functions across various tissues and cells, the role of Annexin A1 in AS remains largely unexplored. In this study, we demonstrate that Annexin A1 treatment effectively reduced the expression of LOX-1 at both the mRNA and protein levels in HUVECs exposed to ox-LDL. Annexin A1 also ameliorated oxidative stress (OS) by decreasing mitochondrial ROS levels and restoring reduced GSH levels. Moreover, Annexin A1 decreased the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6 and MCP-1. Importantly, Annexin A1 inhibited ox-LDL-induced expressions of the endothelial adhesion molecules, such as E-selectin and VCAM-1 in HUVECs, which leads to reduced attachment of THP-1 monocytes to HUVECs. Mechanically, we found that Annexin A1 reversed the expression of KLF2 against ox-LDL mediated by the PI3K/Akt axis. Notably, the silencing of KLF2 abrogated the protective effects of Annexin A1 on E-selectin and VCAM-1 expression and the attachment of THP-1 monocytes to HUVECs. Our findings suggest that Annexin A1 is a potential therapeutic agent for atherosclerosis, offering a novel approach to mitigate endothelial dysfunction and inflammation.

In this study, we compared whether there was any difference between the ASTRAL(Acute Stroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne, ASTRAL) scale in predicting prognosis after IVT(Intravenous Thrombolysis, IVT) in patients with AIS(Acute Ischemic Stroke, AIS) in the ACI(Anterior Circulation Infarction, ACI) and PCI(Posterior Circulation Infarction, PCI), with the aim of providing more guiding information. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0. When comparing the baseline characteristics, the normal distribution test was carried out first, which did not conform to the normal distribution. The continuous variables were expressed in the median and interquartile, and the nonparametric double-independent sample test was carried out. MedCalc software was used to plot ROC(Receiver Operating Characteristic, ROC) curves, calculate AUC(Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, AUC), and compare the prediction performance of the ASTRAL score by Delong text, and the difference of P < 0.05 was statistically significant. The AUCs of ASTRAL in predicting poor prognosis of ACI and PCI patients after IVT were 0.768 and 0.773, respectively. There was no difference in the AUC of ASTRAL score between ACI and PCI(P > 0.05). The ASTRAL scale has consistent prognostic predictive value for AIS in the anterior and posterior circulatory systems and is a reliable tool for predicting poor prognosis of patients with ACI and PCI after IVT.

Although the rates of thrombocytopenia in patients with hematologic malignancies are well known, clinical reports of patients with haematological malignancies presenting with thrombocytopenia who developed venous thromboembolism (VTE) are rare. Defining the risk of VTE in patients with hematologic malignancies in whom anticoagulation is discontinued could help to individualize concepts of anticoagulation. We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records of patients with hematologic malignancies and thrombocytopenia grade 3 (25 × 10⁹/L to < 50 × 10⁹/L) or more severe in 2019-2022 in the Department of Haemato-Oncology at HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld. Data from 67 patients (34 (51%) males, 33 (49%) females) aged between 22 and 82 years (38 leukaemia, 23 lymphoma, 6 other) were included. Prophylactic anticoagulation was performed in 59 (88%) patients and therapeutic due to atrial fibrillation in 8 (12%). Anticoagulation was discontinued in 37 (55%) patients due to thrombocytopenia. Thrombotic events occurred in eight (12%) and minor bleeding in two (3%) patients. Seven patients developed a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) of the upper limbs, only one patient had a thrombosis of the femoral veins. Thrombotic event were much more frequent in patients suffering from leukaemia compared to lymphoma. Two thrombotic events occurred despite continued prophylaxis (2 of 30, 6.6%), the other six after discontinuing of anticoagulation (6 of 37, 16.2%). Both bleedings occurred in the group with continued anticoagulation. Five of the six patients with a thrombotic event, but without anticoagulation, received anticoagulation again despite a low platelet count and no bleeding was observed. Only one patient with jugular vein thrombosis and a platelet count around 4 × 10⁹/L remained without anticoagulation and no thrombus formation was observed. Risk of VTE in our patients with haematologic malignancies in whom anticoagulation is discontinued due to thrombocytopenia grade 3 is about 2.5 times higher than in patients in whom anticoagulation is continued and predominantly affects patients with leukaemia and upper extremity.

Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) level via the anti-factor Xa activity assay (anti-Xa) are commonly used assays for UFH monitoring. While discordance between the two assays is common, its impact on critically ill patient outcomes is unclear. This study aimed to compare the incidence of major bleeding events among critically ill patients with discordant aPTT and anti-Xa activity while on UFH, to patients with no discordance. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of critically ill adult patients who had simultaneous anti-Xa and aPTT levels while receiving continuous UFH infusion. The primary outcome was the incidence of a major bleeding event up to 24 h after UFH discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included incidence of 30-day thrombosis and hospital length of stay (LOS). Among 264 included patients, 156 patients (59%) had at least one discordant paired level. Patients with discordance had an increased risk of major bleeding events (14% versus 5%; unadjusted risk ratio, 3.0; 95% CI 1.2-7.8; p = 0.01), and increased risk of thrombotic events (4% versus 0%; p = 0.04). Hospital LOS was similar between the two groups (13.8 days versus 11.4 days; p = 0.08). In this cohort of critically ill patients receiving continuous UFH, discordance in aPTT and anti-Xa activity was frequently observed and was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events. While both assays remain viable monitoring options, evaluating simultaneous levels may aid in the management of critically ill patients. In patients with discordance, an individualized approach balancing bleeding and thrombotic risks should be considered.

Central venous access devices (CVADs) are integral to cancer treatment. However, catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) poses a considerable risk to patient safety. It interrupts treatment; delays therapy; prolongs hospitalisation; and increases the physical, psychological and financial burden of patients. Our study aims to construct and validate a predictive model for CRT risk in patients with cancer. It offers the possibility to identify independent risk factors for CRT and prevent CRT in patients with cancer. We prospectively followed patients with cancer and CVAD at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2021 to December 2022 until catheter removal. Patients with CRT who met the criteria were taken as the case group. Two patients with cancer but without CRT diagnosed in the same month that a patient with cancer and CRT was diagnosed were selected by using a random number table to form a control group. Data from patients with CVAD placement in Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital and Hainan Provincial People's Hospital (January 2023 to June 2023) were used for the external validation of the optimal model. The incidence rate of CRT in patients with cancer was 5.02% (539/10 736). Amongst different malignant tumour types, head and neck (9.66%), haematological (6.97%) and respiratory (6.58%) tumours had the highest risks. Amongst catheter types, haemodialysis (13.91%), central venous (8.39%) and peripherally inserted central (4.68%) catheters were associated with the highest risks. A total of 500 patients with CRT and 1000 without CRT participated in model construction and were randomly assigned to the training (n = 1050) or testing (n = 450) groups. We identified 11 independent risk factors, including age, catheterisation method, catheter valve, catheter material, infection, insertion history, D-dimer concentration, operation history, anaemia, diabetes and targeted drugs. The logistic regression model had the best discriminative ability amongst the three models. It had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.868 (0.846-0.890) for the training group. The external validation AUC was 0.708 (0.618-0.797). The calibration curve of the nomogram model was consistent with the ideal curve. Moreover, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a good fit (P > 0.05) and high net benefit value for the clinical decision curve. The nomogram model constructed in this study can predict the risk of CRT in patients with cancer. It can help in the early identification and screening of patients at high risk of cancer CRT.

It remains unclear whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are more effective and safer than warfarin in low-weight patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Here, we retrospectively compared the effectiveness and safety of NOACs with those of warfarin in low-weight patients with AF. We extracted the July 2011-September 2022 data of patients with AF treated with a NOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) or warfarin at a tertiary hospital. The patients were divided into low-weight (body weight ≤ 60 kg) and non-low-weight (body weight = 60-100 kg) groups. The primary outcomes were hospitalization for ischemic stroke (IS) or systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding, whereas the secondary outcomes were any ischemic and bleeding events. We used the inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance the baseline characteristics between the groups. In total, 5,044 patients (mean age = 73.7 years, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score = 3.0, mean HAS-BLED score = 2.3) were enrolled and divided into low-weight and non-low-weight groups-containing 1,666 (1,406 NOAC users, 260 warfarin users) and 3,378 (2,978 NOAC users, 400 warfarin users) patients, respectively. NOACs were associated with a lower risk of any bleeding event in the low-weight group (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.61, 95% confidence interval = 0.51-0.73). The between-group differences in the risks of IS/SE, any ischemic event, major bleeding, and any bleeding event were nonsignificant. Thus, the use of NOACs (specifically dabigatran or edoxaban) is associated with a lower risk of any bleeding event than warfarin use in low-weight patients with AF.

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) have been widely used in minor ischemic stroke (MIS) treatment. However, the clinical outcomes and safety of these two treatments have not been compared within the early thrombolytic time window. Here, we conducted a multicenter, ambispective cohort study involving patients with MIS presenting within 4.5 h of symptom onset at 3 affiliated hospitals of Jinan University from 2018-2022. The patients were divided into the IVT group and DAPT group. The primary outcome was a 90-day excellent outcome (mRS ≤ 1). A total of 1,026 patients were enrolled, of whom 492 were assigned to the IVT group and 534 were assigned to the DAPT group. The IVT group had better 90-day excellent outcomes (mRS ≤ 1) than the DAPT group (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.14-2.52, P = 0.010). Among the 623 patients with nondisabling stroke, the proportion of mRS ≤ 1 in the IVT group was higher than the DAPT group (P = 0.009). In the subtypes of MIS with large vessel occlusion/stenosis and with isolated symptoms, the 90-day outcomes of the IVT group and DAPT group were not different (P > 0.05). In conclusion, compared with DAPT, IVT was associated with better 90-day clinical outcomes in patients with MIS (in particular, for those with mRS > 1), including earlier clinical improvement.IVT also benefited the early neurological improvement of patients with severe stenosis/occlusion of intracranial large vessels, nondisabling mild stroke, nondisabling mild stroke with isolated symptoms.