首页 > 最新文献

Journal of visualized surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Malperfusion syndromes in type A aortic dissection: what we have learned from IRAD. A型主动脉夹层灌注不良综合征:我们从IRAD中学到的东西。
Pub Date : 2018-03-31 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2018.03.13
Paolo Berretta, Santi Trimarchi, Himanshu J Patel, Thomas G Gleason, Kim A Eagle, Marco Di Eusanio

Patients presenting with type A acute aortic dissection (TAAD) complicated by malperfusion syndromes represent one of the highest surgical risk cohorts for cardiovascular surgeons. In the setting of aortic dissection, end-organ ischemia may involve any of the major arterial side branches resulting in myocardial, cerebral, spinal cord, visceral and/or limb ischemia. In TAAD patients with malperfusion, notwithstanding continuous improvement in diagnostic and management strategies, surgical and clinical outcomes remain poor and the optimal therapy is controversial. The present review aimed to assess current evidence on TAAD patients with the complication of malperfusion, as enunciated by the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) investigators.

A型急性主动脉夹层(TAAD)合并灌注不良综合征的患者是心血管外科手术风险最高的人群之一。在主动脉夹层的情况下,终末器官缺血可能涉及任何主要动脉侧分支,导致心肌、脑、脊髓、内脏和/或肢体缺血。在TAAD灌注不良患者中,尽管诊断和治疗策略不断改进,但手术和临床结果仍然很差,最佳治疗方法存在争议。本综述旨在评估国际急性主动脉夹层登记处(IRAD)研究人员提出的TAAD患者伴灌注不良并发症的现有证据。
{"title":"Malperfusion syndromes in type A aortic dissection: what we have learned from IRAD.","authors":"Paolo Berretta,&nbsp;Santi Trimarchi,&nbsp;Himanshu J Patel,&nbsp;Thomas G Gleason,&nbsp;Kim A Eagle,&nbsp;Marco Di Eusanio","doi":"10.21037/jovs.2018.03.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2018.03.13","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients presenting with type A acute aortic dissection (TAAD) complicated by malperfusion syndromes represent one of the highest surgical risk cohorts for cardiovascular surgeons. In the setting of aortic dissection, end-organ ischemia may involve any of the major arterial side branches resulting in myocardial, cerebral, spinal cord, visceral and/or limb ischemia. In TAAD patients with malperfusion, notwithstanding continuous improvement in diagnostic and management strategies, surgical and clinical outcomes remain poor and the optimal therapy is controversial. The present review aimed to assess current evidence on TAAD patients with the complication of malperfusion, as enunciated by the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) investigators.</p>","PeriodicalId":17587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of visualized surgery","volume":"4 ","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/jovs.2018.03.13","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36031472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55
Uniportal thoracoscopic resection of intralobar and extralobar pulmonary sequestration. 单门胸腔镜切除肺瓣内和肺瓣外肺隔离。
Pub Date : 2018-03-30 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2018.03.05
Andrea Dell'Amore, Domenica Giunta, Alessio Campisi, Stefano Congiu, Giampiero Dolci, Niccolò Antonino Barbera, Roberto Agosti, Francesco Buia

Pulmonary sequestration (PS) is a rare congenital malformation of the respiratory tract. Two main variants are described, the intralobar and the extralobar PS. Clinical manifestations vary from accidental findings to life threatening complications. Surgical resection is the definitive and indicated treatment of PS. The operation could be performed through an open thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery approach. We report the management of two patients with diagnosis of extralobar PS in the first case and intralobar PS in the second case. Both patients underwent uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery resection of PS with success. In our experience, we confirm that uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery is a safe and feasible approach for extralobar and intralobar PS.

摘要肺隔离是一种罕见的呼吸道先天性畸形。本文描述了两种主要的变异,即颞叶内和颞叶外PS。临床表现从意外发现到危及生命的并发症不等。手术切除是PS的最终治疗方法。手术可以通过开胸或视频辅助胸外科手术进行。我们报告两例诊断为蝶叶外PS和蝶叶内PS的患者的处理方法。两例患者均成功行单门静脉电视胸外科手术切除PS。在我们的经验中,我们证实单门静脉视频辅助胸外科手术是一种安全可行的方法来治疗椎板外和椎板内PS。
{"title":"Uniportal thoracoscopic resection of intralobar and extralobar pulmonary sequestration.","authors":"Andrea Dell'Amore,&nbsp;Domenica Giunta,&nbsp;Alessio Campisi,&nbsp;Stefano Congiu,&nbsp;Giampiero Dolci,&nbsp;Niccolò Antonino Barbera,&nbsp;Roberto Agosti,&nbsp;Francesco Buia","doi":"10.21037/jovs.2018.03.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2018.03.05","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulmonary sequestration (PS) is a rare congenital malformation of the respiratory tract. Two main variants are described, the intralobar and the extralobar PS. Clinical manifestations vary from accidental findings to life threatening complications. Surgical resection is the definitive and indicated treatment of PS. The operation could be performed through an open thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery approach. We report the management of two patients with diagnosis of extralobar PS in the first case and intralobar PS in the second case. Both patients underwent uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery resection of PS with success. In our experience, we confirm that uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery is a safe and feasible approach for extralobar and intralobar PS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of visualized surgery","volume":"4 ","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/jovs.2018.03.05","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36031470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Aortic valve insufficiency in aortic root aneurysms: consider every valve for repair. 主动脉根部动脉瘤主动脉瓣功能不全:考虑每个瓣膜的修复。
Pub Date : 2018-03-30 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2018.01.13
Talal Al-Atassi, Munir Boodhwani

Aortic valve (AV) preservation and repair is emerging as an attractive alternative to AV replacement in younger patients with aortic insufficiency (AI) and aortic root aneurysms. AV repair mitigates some of the risks associated with prosthetic valves. More centers are reporting the safety of AV preservation and repair and favorable short- and long-term outcomes. However, further work is needed to improve long-term repair durability and dissemination of knowledge and technique to make AV repair the gold standard in this patient population.

对于主动脉功能不全(AI)和主动脉根部动脉瘤的年轻患者,主动脉瓣(AV)保存和修复正在成为替代AV的一种有吸引力的选择。房室修复减轻了一些与假瓣膜相关的风险。越来越多的中心报道了房室保存和修复的安全性以及良好的短期和长期结果。然而,需要进一步的工作来提高长期修复的耐久性和知识和技术的传播,使房颤修复成为这一患者群体的金标准。
{"title":"Aortic valve insufficiency in aortic root aneurysms: consider every valve for repair.","authors":"Talal Al-Atassi,&nbsp;Munir Boodhwani","doi":"10.21037/jovs.2018.01.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2018.01.13","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aortic valve (AV) preservation and repair is emerging as an attractive alternative to AV replacement in younger patients with aortic insufficiency (AI) and aortic root aneurysms. AV repair mitigates some of the risks associated with prosthetic valves. More centers are reporting the safety of AV preservation and repair and favorable short- and long-term outcomes. However, further work is needed to improve long-term repair durability and dissemination of knowledge and technique to make AV repair the gold standard in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":17587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of visualized surgery","volume":"4 ","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/jovs.2018.01.13","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36032542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Hybrid thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: is the future here? 混合型胸腹主动脉瘤修复:未来在这里吗?
Pub Date : 2018-03-30 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2018.02.14
Vicente Orozco-Sevilla, Scott A Weldon, Joseph S Coselli

Open surgical repair has been the gold standard for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair for more than 6 decades, but 2 additional options have emerged: total endovascular TAAA repair and a hybrid approach that combines open and endovascular repair. Despite the optimism for an endovascular approach, long-term results for these repairs are still lacking. Some of the issues with this emerging technology include the risk of paraplegia after extensive endovascular repair, the need for multiple reinterventions, continuous stent-graft surveillance, endograft branch stenosis, as well as the significant learning curve. Interest in a hybrid approach has resurged despite the non-superior results compared to open TAAA. Commonly, the focus of the hybrid approach is now on performing a less extensive open TAAA repair, which is then extended with a stent-graft or vice versa. Moreover, this approach is now often performed in two stages in an effort to decrease the associated spinal cord ischemia. Open surgical repair after endovascular aortic repair is increasingly being performed to address serious complications, such as infection or fistula, that cannot be repaired by further endovascular intervention. As with any new technology, there will be an increase in the number of procedure-related complications and a decrease in the number of surgeons who can perform the traditional open operation with good results.

60多年来,开放性手术一直是胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAA)修复的金标准,但出现了两种额外的选择:全血管内TAAA修复和开放和血管内修复相结合的混合方法。尽管对血管内手术方法持乐观态度,但这些修复的长期结果仍然缺乏。这项新兴技术的一些问题包括广泛血管内修复后截瘫的风险、多次再干预的需要、持续的支架移植物监测、移植物分支狭窄以及显著的学习曲线。尽管与开放式TAAA相比,混合型方法的效果并不好,但人们对混合型方法的兴趣已经重新高涨。通常,混合入路的重点是进行不太广泛的开放TAAA修复,然后通过支架移植物进行扩展,反之亦然。此外,这种方法现在通常分两个阶段进行,以减少相关的脊髓缺血。血管内主动脉修复后开放手术修复越来越多地用于解决严重并发症,如感染或瘘,无法通过进一步血管内干预修复。与任何新技术一样,与手术相关的并发症数量会增加,而能够进行传统开放手术并取得良好效果的外科医生数量会减少。
{"title":"Hybrid thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: is the future here?","authors":"Vicente Orozco-Sevilla,&nbsp;Scott A Weldon,&nbsp;Joseph S Coselli","doi":"10.21037/jovs.2018.02.14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2018.02.14","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Open surgical repair has been the gold standard for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair for more than 6 decades, but 2 additional options have emerged: total endovascular TAAA repair and a hybrid approach that combines open and endovascular repair. Despite the optimism for an endovascular approach, long-term results for these repairs are still lacking. Some of the issues with this emerging technology include the risk of paraplegia after extensive endovascular repair, the need for multiple reinterventions, continuous stent-graft surveillance, endograft branch stenosis, as well as the significant learning curve. Interest in a hybrid approach has resurged despite the non-superior results compared to open TAAA. Commonly, the focus of the hybrid approach is now on performing a less extensive open TAAA repair, which is then extended with a stent-graft or vice versa. Moreover, this approach is now often performed in two stages in an effort to decrease the associated spinal cord ischemia. Open surgical repair after endovascular aortic repair is increasingly being performed to address serious complications, such as infection or fistula, that cannot be repaired by further endovascular intervention. As with any new technology, there will be an increase in the number of procedure-related complications and a decrease in the number of surgeons who can perform the traditional open operation with good results.</p>","PeriodicalId":17587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of visualized surgery","volume":"4 ","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/jovs.2018.02.14","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36031469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Pancreaticoduodenectomy: minimizing the learning curve. 胰十二指肠切除术:最小化学习曲线。
Pub Date : 2018-03-30 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2018.03.07
Levan Tsamalaidze, John A Stauffer

Background: Pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes improve as surgeon experience increases. We analyzed the outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy for any improvements over time to assess the learning curve.

Methods: A retrospective study of patients undergoing consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomy by a single surgeon at the beginning of practice was performed. Operative factors and 90-day outcomes were examined and trends over the course of the 4-year time period were analyzed.

Results: Between July 2011 and June 2015, 124 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (including total pancreatectomy, n=17) by open (n=93) or a laparoscopic (n=31) approach. The median operative time was 305 minutes which significantly improved over time. The median blood loss and length of stay were 250 mL and 6 days respectively which did not change over time. The pancreatic fistula rate, total morbidity, major morbidity, and mortality, and readmission rate was 7.5%, 41.1%, 14.5%, 1.6%, and 15.3% respectively and did not change over time. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed most commonly for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (51.6%) with a negative margin rate of 91.1% which significantly improved over time.

Conclusions: The performance of pancreaticoduodenectomy improves as surgical experience is gained. However, a learning curve that impacts patient outcomes can be considerably diminished by appropriate training, high-volume practice/institution, proficient mentorship and experienced multidisciplinary team.

背景:胰十二指肠切除术的结果随着外科医生经验的增加而改善。我们分析了胰十二指肠切除术的结果,以评估随时间推移的任何改善。方法:回顾性研究在执业初期由单一外科医生进行连续胰十二指肠切除术的患者。检查手术因素和90天的预后,并分析4年期间的趋势。结果:2011年7月至2015年6月,124例患者接受了胰十二指肠切除术(包括全胰切除术,n=17),其中开放(n=93)或腹腔镜(n=31)入路。中位手术时间为305分钟,随着时间的推移显著改善。中位失血量和住院时间分别为250 mL和6天,这两项数据不随时间变化。胰瘘发生率、总发病率、主要发病率、死亡率和再入院率分别为7.5%、41.1%、14.5%、1.6%和15.3%,且不随时间变化。胰十二指肠切除术最常用于胰腺癌(51.6%),阴性切缘率为91.1%,随时间推移显著改善。结论:胰十二指肠切除术的疗效随着手术经验的积累而提高。然而,通过适当的培训、大量的实践/机构、熟练的指导和经验丰富的多学科团队,可以大大减少影响患者预后的学习曲线。
{"title":"Pancreaticoduodenectomy: minimizing the learning curve.","authors":"Levan Tsamalaidze,&nbsp;John A Stauffer","doi":"10.21037/jovs.2018.03.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2018.03.07","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes improve as surgeon experience increases. We analyzed the outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy for any improvements over time to assess the learning curve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of patients undergoing consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomy by a single surgeon at the beginning of practice was performed. Operative factors and 90-day outcomes were examined and trends over the course of the 4-year time period were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between July 2011 and June 2015, 124 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (including total pancreatectomy, n=17) by open (n=93) or a laparoscopic (n=31) approach. The median operative time was 305 minutes which significantly improved over time. The median blood loss and length of stay were 250 mL and 6 days respectively which did not change over time. The pancreatic fistula rate, total morbidity, major morbidity, and mortality, and readmission rate was 7.5%, 41.1%, 14.5%, 1.6%, and 15.3% respectively and did not change over time. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed most commonly for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (51.6%) with a negative margin rate of 91.1% which significantly improved over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The performance of pancreaticoduodenectomy improves as surgical experience is gained. However, a learning curve that impacts patient outcomes can be considerably diminished by appropriate training, high-volume practice/institution, proficient mentorship and experienced multidisciplinary team.</p>","PeriodicalId":17587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of visualized surgery","volume":"4 ","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/jovs.2018.03.07","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36031471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Adult pulmonary intralobar sequestrations: changes in the surgical management. 成人肺瓣内隔离:手术处理的改变。
Pub Date : 2018-03-30 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2018.02.13
Akram Traibi, Agathe Seguin-Givelet, Emmanuel Brian, Madalina Grigoroiu, Dominique Gossot

Background: Until now, the traditional procedure to treat intralobar pulmonary sequestration (ILS) in adults has been a lobectomy performed by open chest surgery. We have reviewed our data to determine whether the surgical management of these lesions has evolved over the last years.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who were operated on for an ILS by either posterolateral thoracotomy (PLT group), or by thoracoscopy (TS group) between 2000 and 2016.

Results: Eighteen patients were operated on for a ILS during this period. Before 2011, all resections were performed by thoracotomy (n=6) and after 2011 the approach was either a thoracotomy (n=5) or a thoracoscopy (n=7). There was one conversion because of dense pleural adhesions and this patient was integrated in the PLT group for further analysis. ILS presented more frequently on the left side (n=12, 66.7%) than on the right one (n=6, 33.3%) and exclusively in the lower lobes. All the PLT group patients underwent a lobectomy. In the TS group, five patients underwent a sublobar resection (2 segmentectomies S9+10, 1 basilar segmentectomy and 2 atypical resections). There was no mortality. In the PLT group, 5 patients (45%) had complications versus one patient (14%) in the TS group. The mean hospital stay was 7.4 days in the PLT group versus 5.4 days in the TS group.

Conclusions: These data confirm that ILS can be safely treated by a sublobar resection that should be performed, whenever possible, without opening the chest.

背景:到目前为止,治疗成人肺叶内肺隔离(ILS)的传统方法是通过开胸手术进行肺叶切除术。我们回顾了我们的数据,以确定这些病变的手术治疗是否在过去几年中发生了变化。方法:我们回顾性回顾了2000年至2016年间通过后外侧开胸术(PLT组)或胸腔镜(TS组)进行ILS手术的患者记录。结果:本组共18例患者行ILS手术。2011年之前,所有手术均采用开胸手术(n=6), 2011年之后,手术入路为开胸手术(n=5)或胸腔镜手术(n=7)。由于致密的胸膜粘连,有一例转换,该患者被纳入PLT组进行进一步分析。ILS多发于左侧(n=12, 66.7%),多发于右侧(n=6, 33.3%),且多发于下叶。所有PLT组患者均行肺叶切除术。在TS组中,5例患者接受了叶下切除术(2例S9+10节段切除术,1例基底节段切除术和2例非典型切除术)。没有死亡。在PLT组中,5名患者(45%)出现并发症,而TS组中有1名患者(14%)出现并发症。PLT组的平均住院时间为7.4天,而TS组为5.4天。结论:这些数据证实,只要可能,在不开胸的情况下,行叶下切除术可以安全地治疗ILS。
{"title":"Adult pulmonary intralobar sequestrations: changes in the surgical management.","authors":"Akram Traibi,&nbsp;Agathe Seguin-Givelet,&nbsp;Emmanuel Brian,&nbsp;Madalina Grigoroiu,&nbsp;Dominique Gossot","doi":"10.21037/jovs.2018.02.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2018.02.13","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Until now, the traditional procedure to treat intralobar pulmonary sequestration (ILS) in adults has been a lobectomy performed by open chest surgery. We have reviewed our data to determine whether the surgical management of these lesions has evolved over the last years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who were operated on for an ILS by either posterolateral thoracotomy (PLT group), or by thoracoscopy (TS group) between 2000 and 2016.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients were operated on for a ILS during this period. Before 2011, all resections were performed by thoracotomy (n=6) and after 2011 the approach was either a thoracotomy (n=5) or a thoracoscopy (n=7). There was one conversion because of dense pleural adhesions and this patient was integrated in the PLT group for further analysis. ILS presented more frequently on the left side (n=12, 66.7%) than on the right one (n=6, 33.3%) and exclusively in the lower lobes. All the PLT group patients underwent a lobectomy. In the TS group, five patients underwent a sublobar resection (2 segmentectomies S9+10, 1 basilar segmentectomy and 2 atypical resections). There was no mortality. In the PLT group, 5 patients (45%) had complications versus one patient (14%) in the TS group. The mean hospital stay was 7.4 days in the PLT group versus 5.4 days in the TS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data confirm that ILS can be safely treated by a sublobar resection that should be performed, whenever possible, without opening the chest.</p>","PeriodicalId":17587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of visualized surgery","volume":"4 ","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/jovs.2018.02.13","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36032911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Laparoscopic repair of multiple incisional hernias in a single midline incision by double composite mesh. 双复合补片单中线切口腹腔镜多切口疝修补术。
Pub Date : 2018-03-23 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2018.01.01
Xuefei Yang, Li Jiang, Yue Li, Jingsi Liu, Joe King-Man Fan

Laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernia with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) technique by anti-adhesion mesh has been widely adopted. Due to clinical heterogenicity in location, quantity and size of abdominal incisional hernia, strategy of such repair can be challenging. We hereby present the video of a patient with multiple swiss-cheese hernias in a single long midline incision repaired with double anti-adhesion mesh by IPOM technique. Patient demographics, technical details and clinical tips & tricks are discussed.

腹腔镜下腹膜内嵌补片(IPOM)技术在腹侧切口疝修补术中应用广泛。由于腹部切口疝的位置、数量和大小的临床异质性,这种修复策略可能具有挑战性。我们在此呈现一段视频,患者在一个长中线切口中有多个瑞士奶酪疝,采用双抗粘连补片IPOM技术进行修复。患者人口统计,技术细节和临床提示和技巧进行了讨论。
{"title":"Laparoscopic repair of multiple incisional hernias in a single midline incision by double composite mesh.","authors":"Xuefei Yang,&nbsp;Li Jiang,&nbsp;Yue Li,&nbsp;Jingsi Liu,&nbsp;Joe King-Man Fan","doi":"10.21037/jovs.2018.01.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2018.01.01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernia with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) technique by anti-adhesion mesh has been widely adopted. Due to clinical heterogenicity in location, quantity and size of abdominal incisional hernia, strategy of such repair can be challenging. We hereby present the video of a patient with multiple swiss-cheese hernias in a single long midline incision repaired with double anti-adhesion mesh by IPOM technique. Patient demographics, technical details and clinical tips & tricks are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of visualized surgery","volume":"4 ","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/jovs.2018.01.01","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36032540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conservative management versus endovascular or open surgery in the spectrum of type B aortic dissection. B型主动脉夹层保守治疗与血管内或开放手术的比较。
Pub Date : 2018-03-23 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2018.02.15
Xun Yuan, Andreas Mitsis, Mohammed Ghonem, Ilias Iakovakis, Christoph A Nienaber

Background: Type B aortic dissection is a life-threatening acute aortic condition often with acute ischemic signs or symptoms. With initial management focusing on alleviating malperfusion and pain, and avoiding propagation of dissection or rupture both systolic blood and pulse pressure should be reduced initially by an aggressive medical approach. In the setting of persistent signs of complications endovascular strategies have replaced open surgery and led to a fourfold increase in early survival and better long-term outcomes.

Methods: An electronic health database search was performed on articles published between January 2006 and July 2017. Publications were included in this review if (I) the index aortic pathology was type B aortic (distal) dissection; (II) when medical management, open surgical replacement or thoracic endovascular aortic repair were among those options; (III) when at least one of all basic outcome criteria such as survival, spinal cord ischemia and cerebrovascular accident was reported; (IV) when ≥15 serial patients were included. A total of 62 studies were eligible and analysed.

Results: Our manuscript has summarized data collected over 12 years on management specific outcomes in the setting of distal aortic dissection and provides an up-to-date interpretation of the published evidence. For complicated cases, treated acutely, the 30-day or in-hospital mortality was 7.3% when managed by endovascular means, whereas the pooled rate for 30-day or in-hospital mortality was 19.0% when subjected to open repair. For acute uncomplicated type B dissection usually treated with blood pressure lowering medications, the pooled 30-day or in-hospital mortality rate was 2.4%. Survival rates at 5 years averaged at 60% (40% mortality). Freedom from any aortic event ranged from 34.0% to 83.9%, underlining an inherent risk of progression and late complications. For chronic complicated type B dissection, the rates of stroke, paraplegia and operative mortality following endovascular repair ranged from 5% to 13%, 2% to 13% and 2 to 13%, respectively, while 5-year survival rates after open repair ranged from 60% to 90%. In chronic uncomplicated type B dissection almost 90% of patients survive initial hospitalization and were subjected to medical management with a 5-year survival of 50-80%. However, up to 20-55% of medically treated patients develop aneurysmal degeneration after 5 years with an unknown risk of rupture.

Conclusions: Currently, the less invasive strategy of endovascular repair (as compared to open surgery) provides improved 30-day or in-hospital survival in the setting of complicated acute type B aortic dissection and may seek broad application. Open surgical aortic reconstruction should be left to experienced aortic centres if endovascular management is not an option.

背景:B型主动脉夹层是一种危及生命的急性主动脉疾病,常伴有急性缺血体征或症状。最初的治疗重点是减轻灌注不良和疼痛,避免剥离或破裂的传播,收缩压和脉压应该通过积极的医疗方法来降低。在并发症持续迹象的情况下,血管内策略已取代开放手术,导致早期生存率提高四倍,并有更好的长期预后。方法:对2006年1月至2017年7月发表的文章进行电子健康数据库检索。如果:(1)主动脉指数病理为B型主动脉(远端)夹层,则纳入本综述的出版物;(II)当内科治疗、开放式手术置换或胸腔血管内主动脉修复是这些选择之一时;(III)在生存、脊髓缺血、脑血管意外等基本预后标准中至少有一项报告;(IV)当纳入≥15例系列患者时。共有62项研究符合条件并进行了分析。结果:我们的论文总结了12年来收集的关于远端主动脉夹层治疗具体结果的数据,并对已发表的证据提供了最新的解释。对于急性治疗的复杂病例,采用血管内治疗的30天或住院死亡率为7.3%,而采用开放式修复的30天或住院死亡率为19.0%。对于通常使用降血压药物治疗的急性无并发症B型夹层,30天或住院总死亡率为2.4%。5年生存率平均为60%(死亡率为40%)。主动脉事件的自由度从34.0%到83.9%不等,强调了进展和晚期并发症的固有风险。对于慢性复杂性B型夹层,血管内修复后卒中、截瘫和手术死亡率分别为5% ~ 13%、2% ~ 13%和2% ~ 13%,而开放修复后的5年生存率为60% ~ 90%。在慢性无并发症B型夹层中,几乎90%的患者在初次住院后存活,并接受医疗治疗,5年生存率为50-80%。然而,高达20-55%的经药物治疗的患者在5年后发生动脉瘤变性,其破裂风险未知。结论:目前,与开放手术相比,微创血管内修复策略可提高急性B型主动脉夹层患者的30天或住院生存率,具有广泛的应用前景。如果不能选择血管内处理,应留给经验丰富的主动脉中心进行开放手术主动脉重建。
{"title":"Conservative management versus endovascular or open surgery in the spectrum of type B aortic dissection.","authors":"Xun Yuan,&nbsp;Andreas Mitsis,&nbsp;Mohammed Ghonem,&nbsp;Ilias Iakovakis,&nbsp;Christoph A Nienaber","doi":"10.21037/jovs.2018.02.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2018.02.15","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type B aortic dissection is a life-threatening acute aortic condition often with acute ischemic signs or symptoms. With initial management focusing on alleviating malperfusion and pain, and avoiding propagation of dissection or rupture both systolic blood and pulse pressure should be reduced initially by an aggressive medical approach. In the setting of persistent signs of complications endovascular strategies have replaced open surgery and led to a fourfold increase in early survival and better long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic health database search was performed on articles published between January 2006 and July 2017. Publications were included in this review if (I) the index aortic pathology was type B aortic (distal) dissection; (II) when medical management, open surgical replacement or thoracic endovascular aortic repair were among those options; (III) when at least one of all basic outcome criteria such as survival, spinal cord ischemia and cerebrovascular accident was reported; (IV) when ≥15 serial patients were included. A total of 62 studies were eligible and analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our manuscript has summarized data collected over 12 years on management specific outcomes in the setting of distal aortic dissection and provides an up-to-date interpretation of the published evidence. For complicated cases, treated acutely, the 30-day or in-hospital mortality was 7.3% when managed by endovascular means, whereas the pooled rate for 30-day or in-hospital mortality was 19.0% when subjected to open repair. For acute uncomplicated type B dissection usually treated with blood pressure lowering medications, the pooled 30-day or in-hospital mortality rate was 2.4%. Survival rates at 5 years averaged at 60% (40% mortality). Freedom from any aortic event ranged from 34.0% to 83.9%, underlining an inherent risk of progression and late complications. For chronic complicated type B dissection, the rates of stroke, paraplegia and operative mortality following endovascular repair ranged from 5% to 13%, 2% to 13% and 2 to 13%, respectively, while 5-year survival rates after open repair ranged from 60% to 90%. In chronic uncomplicated type B dissection almost 90% of patients survive initial hospitalization and were subjected to medical management with a 5-year survival of 50-80%. However, up to 20-55% of medically treated patients develop aneurysmal degeneration after 5 years with an unknown risk of rupture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Currently, the less invasive strategy of endovascular repair (as compared to open surgery) provides improved 30-day or in-hospital survival in the setting of complicated acute type B aortic dissection and may seek broad application. Open surgical aortic reconstruction should be left to experienced aortic centres if endovascular management is not an option.</p>","PeriodicalId":17587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of visualized surgery","volume":"4 ","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/jovs.2018.02.15","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36032541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
Extended uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: is it feasible? 扩展单门静脉视频辅助胸外科治疗肺癌:可行吗?
Pub Date : 2018-03-23 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2018.03.09
Iñigo Royo-Crespo, Arthur Vieira, Paula A Ugalde

Since the first description of uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (U-VATS) (or single-port) lobectomy, several centers in Asia and Europe rapidly adopted this technique as a standard approach for treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite the controversies regarding feasibility and completeness of resection, thoracic surgeons in high volume centers keep pushing the limits to perform very complex procedures also known as "extended resections" through minimally invasive surgery. Published series and case reports confirm the viability of U-VATS in highly complex surgical cases such as pneumonectomy, chest wall resection and bronchoplasty, which require experience and technical ability to be performed through a 3-6 cm single incision. In this article, the authors would like to present several clinical indications of locally advanced NSCLC and the technical aspects to accomplish an extended resection through U-VATS.

自从首次描述单孔胸腔镜(U-VATS)(或单孔)肺叶切除术以来,亚洲和欧洲的一些中心迅速采用该技术作为治疗早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准方法。尽管在切除的可行性和完整性方面存在争议,但大容量中心的胸外科医生不断突破极限,通过微创手术进行非常复杂的手术,也称为“扩展切除”。已发表的系列和病例报告证实了U-VATS在高度复杂的手术病例中的可行性,如全肺切除术、胸壁切除术和支气管成形术,这些手术需要经验和技术能力,只需3-6厘米的单切口即可完成。在本文中,作者想提出几个局部晚期NSCLC的临床适应症和通过U-VATS完成扩大切除术的技术方面。
{"title":"Extended uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: is it feasible?","authors":"Iñigo Royo-Crespo,&nbsp;Arthur Vieira,&nbsp;Paula A Ugalde","doi":"10.21037/jovs.2018.03.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2018.03.09","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the first description of uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (U-VATS) (or single-port) lobectomy, several centers in Asia and Europe rapidly adopted this technique as a standard approach for treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite the controversies regarding feasibility and completeness of resection, thoracic surgeons in high volume centers keep pushing the limits to perform very complex procedures also known as \"extended resections\" through minimally invasive surgery. Published series and case reports confirm the viability of U-VATS in highly complex surgical cases such as pneumonectomy, chest wall resection and bronchoplasty, which require experience and technical ability to be performed through a 3-6 cm single incision. In this article, the authors would like to present several clinical indications of locally advanced NSCLC and the technical aspects to accomplish an extended resection through U-VATS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of visualized surgery","volume":"4 ","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/jovs.2018.03.09","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36032539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Video-assisted thoracoscopic PlasmaJet ablation for malignant pleural mesothelioma. 视频辅助胸腔镜等离子喷射消融术治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤。
Pub Date : 2018-03-20 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2018.02.07
Periklis Perikleous, Nizar Asadi, Vladimir Anikin

The role of surgery in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains debatable; nonetheless the relative advantages of different surgical approaches are frequently reassessed and reconsidered. While extensive operations and longer recovery periods can be justified for a group of carefully selected patients, many will present at an advanced stage of their disease or with associated co-morbidities which will exclude them from selection criteria for radical treatment. For these patients, minimally invasive video-assisted procedures may be considered, for purposes of cytoreduction and/or symptomatic relief. Even though there is currently not enough clinical evidence to suggest an improvement in overall survival with limited debulking procedures, it has been suggested that they can improve quality of life over drainage and pleurodesis alone. We consider video-assisted PlasmaJet ablation to potentially have a role in mesothelioma surgery, as it may be used for effective cytoreduction while minimising the risk for complications often associated with extensive pleurectomy procedures, and we report on the use of the PlasmaJet Surgical System in our centre for surgical management of a patient with MPM. After demonstrating safety and absence of major adverse events with this approach, we feel justified in offering the procedure to more of our patients as we aim to collect additional data.

手术在恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)中的作用仍有待商榷;不过,不同手术方法的相对优势经常被重新评估和考虑。虽然对一些经过精心挑选的患者来说,大面积手术和较长的恢复期是合理的,但许多患者处于疾病的晚期,或伴有相关的并发症,因而不符合根治性治疗的选择标准。对于这些患者,可以考虑采用微创视频辅助手术,以达到减少细胞和/或缓解症状的目的。尽管目前还没有足够的临床证据表明有限的剥脱术可以提高总生存率,但有研究表明,与单纯的引流术和胸膜腔穿刺术相比,有限的剥脱术可以提高患者的生活质量。我们认为视频辅助 PlasmaJet 消融术有可能在间皮瘤手术中发挥作用,因为它可用于有效的细胞剥脱,同时最大限度地降低大面积胸膜切除术常见并发症的风险,我们报告了本中心使用 PlasmaJet 手术系统对一名 MPM 患者进行手术治疗的情况。在证明了这种方法的安全性和无重大不良反应后,我们认为有理由为更多患者提供这种手术,因为我们的目标是收集更多数据。
{"title":"Video-assisted thoracoscopic PlasmaJet ablation for malignant pleural mesothelioma.","authors":"Periklis Perikleous, Nizar Asadi, Vladimir Anikin","doi":"10.21037/jovs.2018.02.07","DOIUrl":"10.21037/jovs.2018.02.07","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of surgery in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains debatable; nonetheless the relative advantages of different surgical approaches are frequently reassessed and reconsidered. While extensive operations and longer recovery periods can be justified for a group of carefully selected patients, many will present at an advanced stage of their disease or with associated co-morbidities which will exclude them from selection criteria for radical treatment. For these patients, minimally invasive video-assisted procedures may be considered, for purposes of cytoreduction and/or symptomatic relief. Even though there is currently not enough clinical evidence to suggest an improvement in overall survival with limited debulking procedures, it has been suggested that they can improve quality of life over drainage and pleurodesis alone. We consider video-assisted PlasmaJet ablation to potentially have a role in mesothelioma surgery, as it may be used for effective cytoreduction while minimising the risk for complications often associated with extensive pleurectomy procedures, and we report on the use of the PlasmaJet Surgical System in our centre for surgical management of a patient with MPM. After demonstrating safety and absence of major adverse events with this approach, we feel justified in offering the procedure to more of our patients as we aim to collect additional data.</p>","PeriodicalId":17587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of visualized surgery","volume":"4 ","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897662/pdf/jovs-04-2018.02.07.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36032538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of visualized surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1