Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics最新文献

Reproducibility and replicability of study results are crucial for advancing scientific knowledge. However, achieving these goals is often challenging, which can compromise the credibility of research and incur immeasurable costs for the progression of science. Despite efforts to standardize reporting with guidelines, the description of statistical methodology in manuscripts often remains insufficient, limiting the possibility of replicating scientific studies. A thorough, transparent, and complete report of statistical methods is essential for understanding study results and mimicking statistical strategies implemented in previous studies. This review outlines the key statistical reporting elements required to replicate statistical methods in most current veterinary pharmacology studies. It also offers a protocol for statistical reporting to aid in manuscript preparation and to assist trialists and editors in the collective strive for advancing veterinary pharmacology research.

Persistence of antimicrobial drugs (AMDs) administered to poultry is longer in feathers than in edible tissues. Hence, poultry feathers are a suitable matrix to investigate historical exposure contributing to antimicrobial resistance, since current detection methods are either non-specific or highly technical and costly. Here we present an analysis of the performance of lateral flow test (LFT) panels in the detection of five AMD classes, namely sulfonamides, tetracyclines, beta-lactams, quinolones, and aminoglycosides, on chicken feather samples. The limit of detection (LOD) of eight AMD substances was determined between 4.7 μg/kg for enrofloxacin and 700 μg/kg for streptomycin. The performance of feather LFT was evaluated for four AMD classes against the reference method (LC–MS/MS). From 79 samples collected from the field, LFT test specificity ranged from 0.63 (quinolones) to 0.95 (tetracyclines). Test sensitivity ranged from 0.15 (beta-lactams) to 0.78 (quinolones and tetracyclines). LFT testing had the greatest discriminatory power for tetracyclines (specificity 0.95 and sensitivity 0.78). LFT had similar test characteristics for sulfonamides and quinolones and performed poorly for beta-lactams. Poor recovery rates (< 15%) were observed in neomycin, kanamycin, and ampicillin. These methods are suitable for preliminarily screening tetracyclines, sulfonamides, and quinolones, with recommendations for further extraction protocols.

The pharmacokinetics and plasma protein binding of amoxicillin in cats has not been thoroughly investigated. In a single-group sequential designed experimental study, amoxicillin was administered to six healthy cats intravenously, orally, and subcutaneously. Repeated blood samples were drawn after each administration, and amoxicillin concentrations were determined using High Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled to Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry. Plasma amoxicillin data were subjected to population pharmacokinetic analysis, and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. The population clearance was 0.18 L/h∙kg, the volume of the central compartment was 0.12 L/kg, the highly perfused compartment was 0.009 L/kg, and the poorly perfused compartment was 0.002 L/kg. The bioavailability was 33% and 69% after oral and subcutaneous administration, respectively. After subcutaneous administration of a slow-release formulation, there was absorption rate-limited pharmacokinetics. The plasma protein binding was 0%–24%. The results increase the understanding of the amoxicillin pharmacokinetics in cats. Further studies combining the results with pharmacodynamic data and in silico simulations are warranted.

Despite their widespread clinical use, there is limited pharmacokinetic data for many equine intrauterine antimicrobials. This study aimed to measure the concentration of gentamicin and penicillin in the uterine fluid of mares following infusion of either a standard (PPGent) or long-acting (LA-PPGent) compounded formulation. We hypothesized that both formulations would result in therapeutic concentrations, with total concentrations sustained for longer using the long-acting formulation. Mares were administered 2400 mg of procaine penicillin and 200 mg of gentamicin via a single intrauterine infusion in either a standard (n = 6) or a lyophilized formulation suspended in a slow-release matrix (n = 6). Intrauterine fluid was collected over a 72-h period and analyzed for antibiotic concentrations using high-performance liquid chromatography and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Mean maximal concentrations were seen at 0.5 h in group PPGent (Penicillin: 10,123.0 ± 4298.0 μg/mL, Gentamicin: 3397.3 ± 1338.5 μg/mL) and exceeded MIC for relevant organisms for 72 h (Penicillin: 2.59 ± 6.34 μg/mL, Gentamicin: 2.14 ± 2.4 μg/mL). Interestingly, maximal concentrations were lower in group LA-PPG (Penicillin: 2213.8 ± 967.8 μg/mL—p < 0.05, Gentamicin: 1859 ± 2413 μg/mL) and exceeded MIC for a shorter period of time than the unmodified mixture of commonly used FDA-approved antibiotics.

Building the skills and knowledge necessary to practice evidence-based veterinary medicine (EBVM) should occur throughout the veterinary curriculum. Operationalizing EBVM includes asking a clinical question in PICO format, searching the biomedical literature for evidence, critically appraising the evidence, and applying the evidence to make a clinical recommendation. At the Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, we have embedded EBVM skill-reinforcing assignments into two clinical rotations, Dermatology and Food Animal Medicine and Surgery. In this paper, we describe the implementation and the evolution of assignments, including the learning objectives, workflow, and grading rubrics. We also summarize the types of PICO questions pursued by students. We conclude with the pharmacologist's and the clinicians' reflections on the value of the assignments and the approach of collaboration among specialists.

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a commonly used antiseizure medication in dogs, available in immediate-release (LEV-IR) and extended-release (LEV-XR) formulations. LEV-XR improves owner compliance with less frequent dosing, but its lowest concentration tablet (500 mg) often exceeds recommended doses for small dogs. This study evaluated how modifying LEV-XR tablets affects dissolution rates, comparing intact, split, and crushed LEV-XR tablets with intact LEV-IR tablets. Dissolution testing followed United States Pharmacopeia (USP) guidelines for LEV-XR tablets. Tablets were placed in a buffer solution (pH 6.0) and agitated at 100 rpm. Samples were collected at 0, 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h, then analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a USP reference standard. Results indicated that splitting LEV-XR tablets slightly increased drug release compared to intact tablets, while crushing eliminated extended-release properties, mimicking LEV-IR dissolution. These findings suggest that splitting LEV-XR tablets may be a viable strategy for dosing small dogs without compromising sustained release. Conversely, crushing LEV-XR tablets may be useful for rapid drug release in cluster seizure protocols. Future pharmacokinetic studies are needed to confirm if these in vitro results correlate with in vivo performance for both maintenance and emergency seizure management in dogs.

A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study was performed with eight professional working dogs to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of three opioid reversal agents. Following sedation with 1 mg kg⁻¹ methadone HCl IV, dogs were randomly assigned to receive naloxone, naltrexone, or nalmefene at 0.1 mg kg⁻¹ IM, or saline (0.1 mL kg⁻¹). Sedation scores and vital signs were obtained for 6 h, and blood samples were obtained for 72 h. Across all groups and phases, the mean sedation score prior to methadone was 0.93/14, and prior to reversal/placebo was 11.45/14. Mean sedation scores 1 min post reversal/placebo were 7.6, 7.4, 8.1, and 10.6; and at 5 min were 2.2, 1.9, 1.9, and 11.8 for nalmefene, naloxone, naltrexone, and saline, respectively. Dogs with a sedation score ≥ 10/14 at 20 min after reversal/placebo were administered 0.1 mg kg⁻¹ of naloxone IM and included all dogs that received saline. The reversal agents significantly decreased sedation scores within 5 min (p < 0.001) and reversal was maintained for the duration of the study. A previously undetected slower terminal elimination phase was observed for all analytes between 24 and 72 h; however, future studies with additional time points between 6 and 24 h are needed to generate pharmacokinetic estimates for this phase. These reversal agents may be useful for treating sedation in professional working dogs exposed to opioids prior to seeking veterinary care. Pharmacological differences between methadone and higher potency opioids (fentanyl and its derivatives) preclude interpretation of these findings to non-methadone opioids, and further studies are needed.