Anna Conway, Jason Grebely, Carla Treloar, Susan Matthews, Lise Lafferty, Natalie Taylor, Guillaume Fontaine, Alison D. Marshall
Point-of-care testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) offers multiple benefits to key populations and healthcare providers, but it has not achieved widespread implementation. This analysis investigates the impact of the health system on the sustainability of point-of-care HCV testing in Australia. Between September 2023 and January 2024, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with people involved in HCV policymaking in Australia. Data were coded using WHO's Health System Building Blocks framework (i.e., Health Workforce, Health System Financing, Medical Technologies, Leadership and Governance). Thematic analysis examined how the health system supports and hinders the long-term sustainability of HCV point-of-care testing. There were 29 participants working in seven Australian jurisdictions or nationally: 13 from departments of health, six from community-led organisations, five from local health services, and five from pathology. The analysis demonstrates the interrelations between Building Blocks, but governance was consistently foregrounded across each theme. For Health Workforce, the community approach to models of care in Australia bolstered support for HCV testing outside of traditional healthcare settings. For Health System Financing, sustainability was threatened by a lack of long-term funding mechanisms for point-of-care testing. For Leadership and Governance, state and national HCV elimination targets were seen as important to drive point-of-care testing at the local level, especially when they were reflected in services' key performance indicators. Integration into existing health system structures, sustainable funding mechanisms, and strengthened governance frameworks are needed to sustain HCV point-of-care testing in Australia. Study findings are critical to inform a long-term testing strategy in Australia and internationally.
{"title":"Policymaker Perspectives on the Role of Health Systems in Sustainable Hepatitis C Point-Of-Care Testing in Australia","authors":"Anna Conway, Jason Grebely, Carla Treloar, Susan Matthews, Lise Lafferty, Natalie Taylor, Guillaume Fontaine, Alison D. Marshall","doi":"10.1111/jvh.70080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jvh.70080","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Point-of-care testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) offers multiple benefits to key populations and healthcare providers, but it has not achieved widespread implementation. This analysis investigates the impact of the health system on the sustainability of point-of-care HCV testing in Australia. Between September 2023 and January 2024, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with people involved in HCV policymaking in Australia. Data were coded using WHO's Health System Building Blocks framework (i.e., Health Workforce, Health System Financing, Medical Technologies, Leadership and Governance). Thematic analysis examined how the health system supports and hinders the long-term sustainability of HCV point-of-care testing. There were 29 participants working in seven Australian jurisdictions or nationally: 13 from departments of health, six from community-led organisations, five from local health services, and five from pathology. The analysis demonstrates the interrelations between Building Blocks, but governance was consistently foregrounded across each theme. For Health Workforce, the community approach to models of care in Australia bolstered support for HCV testing outside of traditional healthcare settings. For Health System Financing, sustainability was threatened by a lack of long-term funding mechanisms for point-of-care testing. For Leadership and Governance, state and national HCV elimination targets were seen as important to drive point-of-care testing at the local level, especially when they were reflected in services' key performance indicators. Integration into existing health system structures, sustainable funding mechanisms, and strengthened governance frameworks are needed to sustain HCV point-of-care testing in Australia. Study findings are critical to inform a long-term testing strategy in Australia and internationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":17762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Viral Hepatitis","volume":"32 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvh.70080","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145037566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marvad Ahad, Dina Moussa, Jack Wallace, Amanda J. Wade, Joseph S. Doyle, Jessica Howell
An estimated 254 million people live with hepatitis B worldwide, with only 13% of people diagnosed and 3% receiving antiviral treatment. Without timely treatment, people with hepatitis B risk developing liver damage and liver cancer. In countries like Australia, where most people with hepatitis B are born in countries with higher prevalence, it is important that the knowledge and perceptions of hepatitis B in immigrant populations are explored to improve engagement in care. This review sought to systematically identify and synthesise qualitative research findings describing the knowledge and perceptions of hepatitis B in immigrant communities. An Ovid database search for English language publications for the years 2000–2024 was performed. 34 studies were selected for review. These were analysed using thematic synthesis and categorised using an modified version of the socio-ecological model. Ten analytic themes were identified: (1) knowledge of hepatitis B and misconceptions about transmission, (2) knowledge and familiarity with hepatitis B varies between communities, (3) culturally informed perceptions of health and illness, (4) alternative aetiologies of hepatitis B infection, (5) barriers and facilitators to engagement in healthcare, (6) sources of information, (7) stigma and family dynamics, (8) gender differences, (9) fear and anxieties of engaging with the healthcare system, (10) fear of health outcomes related to hepatitis B. These themes can be used to frame the development of culturally appropriate health promotion materials and interventions to improve knowledge and engagement in care among people living with hepatitis B.
{"title":"Knowledge and Perceptions of Hepatitis B in Immigrant Populations: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research","authors":"Marvad Ahad, Dina Moussa, Jack Wallace, Amanda J. Wade, Joseph S. Doyle, Jessica Howell","doi":"10.1111/jvh.70069","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jvh.70069","url":null,"abstract":"<p>An estimated 254 million people live with hepatitis B worldwide, with only 13% of people diagnosed and 3% receiving antiviral treatment. Without timely treatment, people with hepatitis B risk developing liver damage and liver cancer. In countries like Australia, where most people with hepatitis B are born in countries with higher prevalence, it is important that the knowledge and perceptions of hepatitis B in immigrant populations are explored to improve engagement in care. This review sought to systematically identify and synthesise qualitative research findings describing the knowledge and perceptions of hepatitis B in immigrant communities. An Ovid database search for English language publications for the years 2000–2024 was performed. 34 studies were selected for review. These were analysed using thematic synthesis and categorised using an modified version of the socio-ecological model. Ten analytic themes were identified: (1) knowledge of hepatitis B and misconceptions about transmission, (2) knowledge and familiarity with hepatitis B varies between communities, (3) culturally informed perceptions of health and illness, (4) alternative aetiologies of hepatitis B infection, (5) barriers and facilitators to engagement in healthcare, (6) sources of information, (7) stigma and family dynamics, (8) gender differences, (9) fear and anxieties of engaging with the healthcare system, (10) fear of health outcomes related to hepatitis B. These themes can be used to frame the development of culturally appropriate health promotion materials and interventions to improve knowledge and engagement in care among people living with hepatitis B.</p>","PeriodicalId":17762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Viral Hepatitis","volume":"32 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvh.70069","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145033662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}