Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State最新文献

英文中文

CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES 概念和方法问题

Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State

Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/9781784717216.00009

M. Radetzki, J. Tilton

引用次数: 44

Reflection upon the development of, and the future for, welfare states 对福利国家的发展和未来的思考

Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State

Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/9781789906745.00035

B. Greve

This chapter makes a summary of what we know about austerity, retrenchment and populism, based especially on the contributions in this book on these topics. Based on the pressure on welfare states in the aftermath of the COVID19 crisis there is further a discussion of how the virusmay have long-term consequences and whether these will be the same across different types of welfare states. This section, by its very nature, becomes more speculative, but there is, however, inspiration from the recent financial crisis and developments in the European economies in particular, which may have an impact on the scope and assessment of how the viruswill impact. © Bent Greve 2021.

本章对我们所知道的紧缩、紧缩和民粹主义做了一个总结，尤其是基于本书对这些主题的贡献。基于covid - 19危机后福利国家面临的压力，人们进一步讨论了病毒如何产生长期后果，以及这些后果在不同类型的福利国家是否会相同。本节就其性质而言更具投机性，但最近的金融危机和特别是欧洲经济的事态发展可能会对病毒影响的范围和评估产生影响，这给了我们一些启示。©Bent Greve 2021。

引用次数: 1

ARE SPECIFIC WELFARE PROGRAMS MORE PRONE TO AUSTERITY - AND IF SO, WHY? 具体的福利项目是否更倾向于紧缩?如果是，为什么?

Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State

Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/9781789906745.00024

引用次数: 0

The politics of retrenchment 紧缩政策

Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State

Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/9781789906745.00009

Peter H. Starke

引用次数: 0

Family policy in Europe in the era of austerity and populism 紧缩和民粹主义时代的欧洲家庭政策

Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State

Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/9781789906745.00028

Mikael Nygård, M. Kuisma

引用次数: 0

CHANGE TO THE ROLE OF WELFARE STATES? 改变福利国家的角色?

Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State

Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/9781789906745.00034

引用次数: 0

Measuring retrenchment in welfare states: overcoming the challenges to the definition, operationalization and measurement of welfare policy change 衡量福利国家的紧缩:克服福利政策变化的定义、运作和衡量方面的挑战

Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State

Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/9781789906745.00011

Elisa Helena Xiol Y Ferreira, Michael Howlett

引用次数: 0

The United Kingdom before and after Brexit 英国脱欧前后

Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State

Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/9781789906745.00020

Benjamin Leruth, P. Taylor-Gooby

The United Kingdom’s liberal welfare state has undergone profound changes since the Great Recession. Torn between individualism (advocated by successive governments under David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson) and predistribution (advocated by the Labour Party), the country has also not been immune to populism through the rise in influence of the UK Independence Party in the mid-2010s and policies advocated by Boris Johnson. Over the past decade, the most notable event that divided the country was the vote to leave the United Kingdom. Even though Brexit is best understood as a distinctive process of differentiated disintegration in the European uUnion and its long-term socio-economic effects remain difficult to predict, it certainly had a direct impact on the nature of the British welfare state itself, as welfare chauvinistic measures were proposed by David Cameron as part of the failed renegotiation package. These proposals were approved by the European Council, further suggesting that welfare chauvinism can be accepted (or at least tolerated) by other European member states. This chapter explores the past, present and future of the liberal welfare state in Europe. Following a review of the definition and conceptualisation of liberal welfare regimes, it offers a history of the development of the British welfare state and how it shifted towards neo-liberalism from the 1970s onwards. It then focuses on the Great Recession and the subsequent Brexit vote to assess how these events have affected the British Welfare State. The chapter then concludes by reflecting on the impact the Covid-19 crisis may have on the future of social policy in the UK. © Bent Greve 2021.

自经济大衰退以来，英国的自由福利国家经历了深刻的变化。在个人主义(由大卫·卡梅伦、特蕾莎·梅和鲍里斯·约翰逊领导的历届政府所倡导)和预分配(由工党所倡导)之间，英国也未能通过2010年代中期英国独立党影响力的上升和鲍里斯·约翰逊所倡导的政策而免受民粹主义的影响。在过去的十年里，分裂这个国家的最引人注目的事件是投票脱离英国。尽管英国脱欧最好被理解为欧盟分化解体的独特过程，其长期的社会经济影响仍难以预测，但它肯定对英国福利国家本身的性质产生了直接影响，因为戴维•卡梅伦(David Cameron)提出的福利沙文主义措施是失败的重新谈判方案的一部分。这些提议得到了欧洲理事会的批准，进一步表明福利沙文主义可以被其他欧洲成员国接受(或至少容忍)。本章探讨了欧洲自由福利国家的过去、现在和未来。在回顾了自由福利制度的定义和概念化之后，它提供了英国福利国家的发展历史，以及它如何从20世纪70年代开始转向新自由主义。然后，它将重点放在大衰退和随后的英国脱欧公投上，以评估这些事件如何影响英国的福利国家。最后，本章反思了新冠肺炎危机可能对英国未来社会政策的影响。©Bent Greve 2021。

{"title":"The United Kingdom before and after Brexit","authors":"Benjamin Leruth, P. Taylor-Gooby","doi":"10.4337/9781789906745.00020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906745.00020","url":null,"abstract":"The United Kingdom’s liberal welfare state has undergone profound changes since the Great Recession. Torn between individualism (advocated by successive governments under David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson) and predistribution (advocated by the Labour Party), the country has also not been immune to populism through the rise in influence of the UK Independence Party in the mid-2010s and policies advocated by Boris Johnson. Over the past decade, the most notable event that divided the country was the vote to leave the United Kingdom. Even though Brexit is best understood as a distinctive process of differentiated disintegration in the European uUnion and its long-term socio-economic effects remain difficult to predict, it certainly had a direct impact on the nature of the British welfare state itself, as welfare chauvinistic measures were proposed by David Cameron as part of the failed renegotiation package. These proposals were approved by the European Council, further suggesting that welfare chauvinism can be accepted (or at least tolerated) by other European member states. This chapter explores the past, present and future of the liberal welfare state in Europe. Following a review of the definition and conceptualisation of liberal welfare regimes, it offers a history of the development of the British welfare state and how it shifted towards neo-liberalism from the 1970s onwards. It then focuses on the Great Recession and the subsequent Brexit vote to assess how these events have affected the British Welfare State. The chapter then concludes by reflecting on the impact the Covid-19 crisis may have on the future of social policy in the UK. © Bent Greve 2021.","PeriodicalId":178534,"journal":{"name":"Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State","volume":"311 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122313097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

South Europe: reclaiming welfare post-crisis? 南欧:危机后恢复福利?

Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State

Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/9781789906745.00021

M. Petmesidou, A. Guillén

This chapter examines whether the austerity-induced reforms in South Europe, over much of the 2010s, have reconfigured the scope and scale of the public welfare systems, undermined political trust and nurtured populism. The analysis highlights cross-country trends in modernizing/rationalizing the main pillars of the welfare state prior to the Great Recession. It traces convergence in the thrust of retrenchment and flexibilization under prolonged austerity and external conditionality in the wake of the financial and debt crisis and assesses how far in the last few years recovery has spurred some reform reversals. Further, it unpicks the significance of the surge/revival of left and/or right-leaning populist movements and ideas in the last decade and the cross-country varying electoral success of a populist social agenda. Against this backdrop some preliminary considerations are raised as to how South European societies are navigating the covid-19 storm. © Bent Greve 2021.

本章考察了在2010年代的大部分时间里，由紧缩政策引发的南欧改革是否重新配置了公共福利体系的范围和规模，破坏了政治信任，并孕育了民粹主义。该分析强调了大衰退前福利国家主要支柱现代化/合理化的跨国趋势。它追溯了金融和债务危机后，在长期紧缩和外部条件限制下，紧缩和灵活性的推动力趋同，并评估了过去几年复苏在多大程度上刺激了一些改革的逆转。此外，它还揭示了过去十年中左翼和/或右倾民粹主义运动和思想的激增/复兴的重要性，以及民粹主义社会议程在全国范围内不同程度的选举成功。在此背景下，对南欧社会如何应对covid-19风暴提出了一些初步考虑。©Bent Greve 2021。

引用次数: 0

首页上一页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀