Leukemia research最新文献

Background

Blinatumomab is a CD3/CD19-directed bispecific T-cell engager molecule that engages T cells to lyse CD19-expressing B cells. Based on a multicenter, open-label, phase 3, randomized clinical trial (Clinical Trials ID: NCT02393859), we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of blinatumomab compared to standard consolidation chemotherapy (SC) for the treatment of pediatric patients with high-risk first-relapsed Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) from a Mexico healthcare payer perspective.

Methods

A decision-analytic model, a partitioned survival model, was used to estimate the life-years (LYs) and costs over a lifetime horizon. We assumed that patients who remained alive beyond a 5-year period were cured. To account for the lingering impacts of cancer treatment, an excess mortality rate was incorporated into the model. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by fitting mixture-cure and standard parametric survival distributions to the time-to-event data from the phase 3 trial. The model accounted for treatment costs, adverse event costs, follow-up costs, subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) costs, and subsequent treatment costs.

Results

Blinatumomab was associated with a lifetime gained of 5.11 years at an incremental cost of $621,111 MXN, relative to SC. The ICER for blinatumomab vs Standard of care was estimated to be $121,526 MXN/LY gained in the base case. Cost-effectiveness was sensitive to varying the time horizon. Blinatumomab had a probability of 99 % of being cost-effective, relative to SC, at the willingness to pay threshold defined in Mexico.

Limitations

Health-related quality of life values were not included in the analysis and therefore we did not estimate the quality-adjusted life-years gained.

Conclusions

Blinatumomab was associated with greater benefit in terms of OS and EFS relative to SC. Probabilistic, deterministic, and scenario analyses indicate that blinatumomab represents the best value for money. Therefore, blinatumomab administered as part of consolidation therapy in B-ALL pediatric patients with high-risk first relapse is a cost-effective option.

In acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), the combination treatment of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) appears to have a synergistic effect. Due to this synergism, differentiation syndrome (DS) in APL assumes a distinct identity separate from the formerly known ATRA syndrome, with distinct temporal patterns, diagnostic parameters, and clinical behavior. We retrospectively evaluated single-center data of years 2013–2022. Patients with newly diagnosed APL were categorized into three groups (16 patients in ATRA/ATO standard-risk group, 3 patients in ATRA/chemotherapy standard-risk group, and 5 patients in ATRA/chemotherapy high-risk group). Our aim was to analyze leukocytosis, signs of DS, and hepatic impairment within the first 25 days of treatment. The incidence of DS in the ATRA/ATO SR group was 43.8 %, with a median of 4 days and 2 days from ATRA and ATO initiation, respectively. This group also exhibited higher peak levels of leukocytosis 34.5 (6.0–113.4) x10⁹/L (p = 0.0809). ALT elevation was more prevalent in the ATRA/ATO SR group (93.75 %), with 68.75 % grade 3–4 elevations (p = 0.0094). Importantly, all patients in this group had ALT levels that returned to normal during the subsequent consolidations. These findings suggest hepatopathy as a potential manifestation of ATRA/ATO induced leukocyte differentiation and/or DS. Diverse differentiation patterns were identified within the ATRA/ATO group, classifying patients into three distinct subgroups based on the concurrent dynamics of leukocytes and ALT levels, illustrating simultaneous, sequential, and divergent elevation patterns. These emphasize the different distribution of differentiation (organs vs. peripheral blood). We introduced real-world data and advocated for reevaluation of the current DS definition and associated diagnostic thresholds. Our study, conducted in a small country with a limited number of APL patients, acknowledges the inherent constraints in sample size. Further investigations with larger patient cohorts are warranted to validate and reinforce the outcomes observed in our study.

The FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib is standard therapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated (FLT3^mut) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but the overall survival (OS) is only approximately 20 % and few patients achieve deep and/ or durable response. We retrospectively analyzed 29 R/R FLT3^mut AML patients treated on triplet regimens (gilteritinib+ venetoclax［VEN] +azacitidine［AZA]). Nineteen patients (65.5 %) had received prior FLT3 inhibitor therapy. The modified composite complete remission (mCRc) rate was 62.1 % (n = 18; CR, 4/29,13.8 %; CRi, 6/29, 20.7 %; MLFS, 8/29, 27.6 %). Among 18 patients achieved mCRc, FLT3-PCR negativity was 94.4 % (n=17), and flow-cytometry negativity was 77.7 % (n=14). The mCRc rate was 70 % (n=7) in 10 patients without prior FLT3 TKI exposure and 57.8 % (n=11) in 19 patients with prior FLT3 TKI exposure (P=0.52). At the end of the first cycle, the median time to ANC > 0.5× 10⁹/L was 38 days and platelet > 50× 10⁹/L was 31 days among responders, but 60-day mortality was 0 %. The estimated 2-year OS was 60.9 % for all R/R FLT3^mut patients. The 1-year OS was 80 % and 58.8 % in patients without and with prior FLT3 TKI exposure, respectively (P=0.79). The estimated 2-year OS was 62 % in 19 (65.5 %) patients who received allo-HSCT after triplet therapy and 37 % in 10 patients who did not receive allo-HSCT (P=0.03). In conclusion, triplet therapy with gilteritinib, VEN, and AZA is effective and safe and an excellent frontline option for R/R FLT3^mut AML.

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of decitabine consolidation after treatment with CD19/CD22 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) for patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (r/r B-ALL).

Methods

We retrospectively analysed 48 patients with r/r B-ALL who received CD19/CD22 CAR-T therapy between September 2017 and May 2021. Sixteen patients received decitabine consolidation (20 mg/m²/day for 5 days at 3-month intervals) after CAR-T therapy (DAC group), while 32 patients did not receive decitabine consolidation (CON group). Overall survival (OS), leukaemia-free survival (LFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) were evaluated in both groups. Time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

The median follow-up periods in the DAC and CON groups were 41.2 months and 28.6 months, respectively. The 4-year OS and 4-year LFS rates in both groups were 93.3 % and 64.3 % (P=0.029) and 87.5 % and 55.9 % (P=0.059), respectively. The 1-year CIR was 6.25 % and 28.6 %, respectively. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that decitabine consolidation after CAR-T therapy was significantly associated with superior OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.121, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.015–0.947, P=0.044), and bridging to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation after CAR-T therapy was significantly associated with superior LFS (HR: 0.279, 95 %CI: 0.093–0.840, P=0.023).

Conclusions

Our study recommends decitabine consolidation after CD19/CD22 CAR-T therapy as a novel maintenance strategy to improve the survival outcomes of patients with r/r B-ALL.

Myelodysplastic syndrome, or myelodysplastic neoplasms, are a rare finding in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (AYA) patients. More literature is needed to highlight trends of survival or treatment resistance in subpopulations to improve treatment. Here we report a single center retrospective analysis of pediatric and AYA patients from 2000 to 2022 including molecular and cytogenetic data. Using the IPSS-R and IPSS-M, which have been reported exclusively in adults, and excluding patients with bone marrow failure syndromes, we analyzed 119 pediatric and AYA patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms. Therapy-related myelodysplastic neoplasms were present in 36 % of patients, and 31 % of patients developed acute myeloid leukemia. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate for the entire cohort was 45 %. Contrary to young adults and older adults, mutations were not common in pediatrics. Those who underwent stem cell transplant (SCT)(at any time) had significantly longer median OS. Although SCT at any time improved OS in the de novo myelodysplastic neoplasm group, the choice of the initial treatment with intensive chemotherapy, hypomethylating agents, or SCT did not significantly alter OS. Median OS was shorter in the pediatric group (<18 years old) and longer for those with isolated deletion of 5q or TET2 mutation, but these were not significant findings. Median OS was significantly shorter in those with monosomy 7 or 7q deletion and those with therapy-related myelodysplastic neoplasms. These findings build on previously reported findings and encourage the use of SCT along with molecular and cytogenetic analysis.

To investigate the safety of total body irradiation-based myeloablative conditioning (TBI-MAC) in adolescent and young adult (AYA) Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients treated with pediatric protocols, treatment outcomes of 106 AYA patients aged 16–39 years old undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) with TBI-MAC in the first remission were compared according to chemotherapy types before transplant. Pediatric and adult protocols were used in 56 and 50 of the patients, respectively. The cumulative incidence (CI) of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and the overall survival (OS) rates were not significantly different between the pediatric-protocol and adult-protocol group (NRM: 4 % vs. 14 % at five years post-transplant, respectively, p = 0.26; OS: 81 % vs. 66 %, respectively, p = 0.14). Multivariate analysis for NRM revealed that a performance status >0 (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.8) and transplant due to chemotherapy toxicities (HR = 3.5) were independent risk factors, but a pediatric protocol was not (HR = 0.48). The CI of NRM and the OS rates were also similar among patients aged over 24 years old. These findings suggested that conventional allo-SCT with TBI-MAC can be performed without increasing NRM in AYA patients with Ph-negative ALL even after pediatric protocols.

Early T-cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ETP-ALL), T-Lymphoid/Myeloid Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia (T/M-MPAL), and Acute Myeloid Leukemia with minimal differentiation (AML-M0) are immature acute leukemias (AL) that present overlapping T-cell lymphoid and myeloid features at different degrees, with impact to disease classification. An interesting strategy to assess lymphoid lineage commitment and maturation is the analysis of V(D)J gene segment recombination, which can be applied to investigate leukemic cells in immature AL. Herein, we revisited 19 ETP-ALL, 8 T/M-MPAL, and 12 AML-M0 pediatric patients to characterize V(D)J rearrangement (V(D)J-r) profiles associated with other somatic alterations. V(D)J-r were identified in 74 %, 25 %, and 25 % of ETP-ALL, T/M-MPAL, and AML-M0, respectively. Forty-six percent of ETP-ALL harbored ≥ 3 V(D)J-r, while there was no more than one V(D)J-r per patient in AML-M0 and T/M-MPAL. TCRD was the most rearranged locus in ETPALL, but it was not rearranged in other AL. In ETP-ALL, N/KRAS mutations were associated with absence of V(D)J-r, while NF1 deletion was most frequent in patients with ≥ 3 V(D)J-r. Relapse and death occurred mainly in patients harboring one or no rearranged locus. Molecular characterization of V(D)J-r in our cohort indicates a distinct profile of ETP-ALL, compared to T/M-MPAL and AML-M0. Our findings also suggest that the clinical outcome of ETP-ALL patients may be affected by blast cell maturity, inferred from the number of rearranged TCR loci.

Objective

To investigate the relationship between the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with arsenic trioxide (ATO) and glycolysis, as well as its underlying molecular mechanism.

Methods

The GEO database was used to analyze alterations in the expression of RPL22L1 in APL patients and its correlation with glycolysis. The levels of RPL22L1 and glycolysis were assessed in 9 paired clinical samples. NB4 cells and NB4 cells with knockdown of RPL22L1 were treated with ATO. The protein and mRNA of RPL22L1 were detected using RT-PCR and Western blot, and the content was determined by using glucose, pyruvate, and lactate detection kits. Finally, detection of cell proliferation using CCK8, migration by scratch assay, and apoptosis by flow cytometry, and the biological function of ATO in NB4 cells was examined.

Results

The expression of RPL22L1 in GSE213742 and GSE234103 datasets exhibited a significant increase in human APL cells, specifically NB4 cells. RPL22L1 in GSE213742 and GSE234103 gene expression matrix was significantly elevated in human APL cells NB4 cells, and further analysis found RPL22L1 showed a strong positive correlation with glycolysis. Cellular experiments showed that ATO inhibited RPL22L1 in NB4 cells and inhibited glycolysis in APL cells. The ATO played a pivotal role in suppressing the proliferation, migration, as well as invasion of NH4 cells.

Conclusion

ATO regulates the blycolytic pathway in APL by inhibiting RPL22L1 expression, and this may contribute to its therapeutic effects.

FLT3 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy are the standard of care for newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, no head-to-head studies have established the superiority of one FLT3 inhibitor over another. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate overall survival (OS) among different FLT3 inhibitors. Three relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), involving 1.358 patients treated with midostaurin, quizartinib, and sorafenib, were included in our analysis. The hazard ratios (HRs) revealed no significant differences in OS between midostaurin and quizartinib (HR, 1.00; 95 % CI, 0.73–1.36), midostaurin and sorafenib (HR, 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.52–1.84), or quizartinib and sorafenib (HR, 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.51–1.85). This NMA, the first to explore this issue, found no OS differences among the different FLT3 inhibitors. In the absence of direct comparison trials, our findings provide practical insights for clinical decision-making.