Introduction: Histologic transformation from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a well-recognized mechanism of resistance in EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma upon treatment with TKIs, but rarely reported with programmed death1 (PD-1) inhibitors. We report two cases of potential transformation during treatment with PD-1 inhibitors.
Case presentations: Case 1, a 65-year-old man was diagnosed with stage IVa lung adenocarcinoma on pleural fluid cytology. He received six cycles of carboplatin and pemetrexed, then maintained on pemetrexed. He had disease progression after nine cycles of pemetrexed and was switched to nivolumab. He progressed after five cycles of nivolumab. Core biopsy of the lung mass revealed SCLC. Case 2, a 68-year-old man was diagnosed with two primary NSCLCs and underwent resection. He had recurrence after several months and was treated with four cycles of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab on clinical trial, with partial response. He was continued on pembrolizumab and had disease progression after 30 cycles. Biopsy of the new lesions showed SCLC.
Discussion: Histologic transformation from NSCLC to SCLC can be explained by the presence of a common cell precursor. Proposed molecular mechanisms include loss of RB1, TP53 mutations, and MYC amplification. The distinction between transformation and mixed histology tumors is challenging, especially when pathologic material used for the initial diagnosis is limited. The possibility of a second metachronous primary lung cancer cannot be excluded in our cases.
Conclusion: Histologic transformation with PD-1 inhibitors could be under-recognized. Disease progression should prompt re-biopsy to uncover new histology and change in treatment. Future studies are needed to elucidate mechanisms and predictors of transformation.
{"title":"Non-small cell to small cell lung cancer on PD-1 inhibitors: two cases on potential histologic transformation.","authors":"Nadine Abdallah, Misako Nagasaka, Eman Abdulfatah, Dongping Shi, Antoinette J Wozniak, Ammar Sukari","doi":"10.2147/LCTT.S173724","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S173724","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Histologic transformation from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a well-recognized mechanism of resistance in <i>EGFR</i>-mutant adenocarcinoma upon treatment with TKIs, but rarely reported with programmed death1 (PD-1) inhibitors. We report two cases of potential transformation during treatment with PD-1 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Case presentations: </strong>Case 1, a 65-year-old man was diagnosed with stage IVa lung adenocarcinoma on pleural fluid cytology. He received six cycles of carboplatin and pemetrexed, then maintained on pemetrexed. He had disease progression after nine cycles of pemetrexed and was switched to nivolumab. He progressed after five cycles of nivolumab. Core biopsy of the lung mass revealed SCLC. Case 2, a 68-year-old man was diagnosed with two primary NSCLCs and underwent resection. He had recurrence after several months and was treated with four cycles of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab on clinical trial, with partial response. He was continued on pembrolizumab and had disease progression after 30 cycles. Biopsy of the new lesions showed SCLC.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Histologic transformation from NSCLC to SCLC can be explained by the presence of a common cell precursor. Proposed molecular mechanisms include loss of <i>RB1</i>, <i>TP53</i> mutations, and <i>MYC</i> amplification. The distinction between transformation and mixed histology tumors is challenging, especially when pathologic material used for the initial diagnosis is limited. The possibility of a second metachronous primary lung cancer cannot be excluded in our cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Histologic transformation with PD-1 inhibitors could be under-recognized. Disease progression should prompt re-biopsy to uncover new histology and change in treatment. Future studies are needed to elucidate mechanisms and predictors of transformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18066,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","volume":"9 ","pages":"85-90"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2018-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LCTT.S173724","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36737238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-09-10eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.2147/LCTT.S155315
Ariel E Pollock, Lowell Shinn, Richard Anderson, Sarah Butler, Jondavid Pollock
Objectives: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is considered a standard option for patients with stage 3 small cell lung carcinoma. A 25% risk of acute esophagitis is experienced by patients as a result of the volume of esophagus encompassed within a conformal radiotherapy technique. We reviewed our institutional experience administering the radioprotectant amifostine prior to daily radiotherapy to determine its effects on the onset of esophagitis.
Materials and methods: From 2005 to 2016, 49 patients diagnosed with stage 3 small cell lung carcinoma received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Chemotherapy (CT) consisted of cisplatin and etoposide with radiotherapy (RT) encompassing CT-identified gross tumor volume. In 32 patients (group 1), amifostine was delivered (500 mg subcutaneously divided in two injections) prior to the second daily RT fraction. The remaining 17 patients (group 2) did not receive amifostine due to choice or drug intolerance.
Results: Metrics of esophagitis included weight loss and opiate requirement during treatment. About 31% of group 1 required opiates at a median RT dose of 3300 cGy, and 41% of group 2 required opiates at a median dose of 2250 cGy. The dose of radiotherapy delivered to 50% of the esophageal volume for group 1 was significantly greater than that in group 2 (3000 cGy vs 576 cGy).
Conclusion: In this modern retrospective series of thoracic chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of stage 3 small cell lung cancer, amifostine that was delivered subcutaneously postponed the onset of esophagitis.
目的:同步放化疗被认为是3期小细胞肺癌患者的标准选择。由于适形放疗技术所包围的食道体积,患者发生急性食管炎的风险为25%。我们回顾了在每日放疗前使用放射保护剂氨磷汀的机构经验,以确定其对食管炎发病的影响。材料与方法:2005 - 2016年,49例确诊为3期小细胞肺癌的患者接受同步放化疗。化疗(CT)包括顺铂和依托泊苷,放疗(RT)包括CT确定的总肿瘤体积。在32例患者(1组)中,在第二次每日RT治疗之前,给予氨磷汀(500mg皮下分两次注射)。其余17例患者(第二组)由于选择或药物不耐受而未接受氨磷汀治疗。结果:食道炎的指标包括治疗期间体重减轻和阿片类药物的需要量。约31%的1组患者在中位放疗剂量3300 cGy时需要阿片类药物,41%的2组患者在中位放疗剂量2250 cGy时需要阿片类药物。放疗剂量为食管体积的50%,组1明显大于组2 (3000 cGy vs 576 cGy)。结论:在这个现代回顾性系列胸椎放化疗治疗3期小细胞肺癌中,皮下给药氨磷汀延缓了食管炎的发生。
{"title":"Amifostine- and chemoradiotherapy-related esophagitis in small cell lung cancer: a single institutional series and literature update.","authors":"Ariel E Pollock, Lowell Shinn, Richard Anderson, Sarah Butler, Jondavid Pollock","doi":"10.2147/LCTT.S155315","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S155315","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is considered a standard option for patients with stage 3 small cell lung carcinoma. A 25% risk of acute esophagitis is experienced by patients as a result of the volume of esophagus encompassed within a conformal radiotherapy technique. We reviewed our institutional experience administering the radioprotectant amifostine prior to daily radiotherapy to determine its effects on the onset of esophagitis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From 2005 to 2016, 49 patients diagnosed with stage 3 small cell lung carcinoma received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Chemotherapy (CT) consisted of cisplatin and etoposide with radiotherapy (RT) encompassing CT-identified gross tumor volume. In 32 patients (group 1), amifostine was delivered (500 mg subcutaneously divided in two injections) prior to the second daily RT fraction. The remaining 17 patients (group 2) did not receive amifostine due to choice or drug intolerance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Metrics of esophagitis included weight loss and opiate requirement during treatment. About 31% of group 1 required opiates at a median RT dose of 3300 cGy, and 41% of group 2 required opiates at a median dose of 2250 cGy. The dose of radiotherapy delivered to 50% of the esophageal volume for group 1 was significantly greater than that in group 2 (3000 cGy vs 576 cGy).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this modern retrospective series of thoracic chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of stage 3 small cell lung cancer, amifostine that was delivered subcutaneously postponed the onset of esophagitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18066,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","volume":"9 ","pages":"79-84"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LCTT.S155315","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36511861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-09-06eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.2147/LCTT.S173948
Lei Deng, Janaki Sharma, Elizabeth Ravera, Balazs Halmos, Haiying Cheng
Alectinib can cause rare, but severe hypersensitivity. The cross-reactivity between different ALK inhibitors is unknown and desensitization is the only reported management. We hereby report the first case of severe delayed hypersensitivity developed in a lung cancer patient treated by alectinib, who was successfully managed by switching to brigatinib, another ALK inhibitor. The patient achieved excellent anti-tumor response to brigatinib. Our case provides an alternative and safe strategy in patients with alectinib-related hypersensitivity.
{"title":"Hypersensitivity in ALK-positive lung cancers exposed to ALK inhibitors: a case of successful switch to an alternative ALK inhibitor and systematic review of the literature.","authors":"Lei Deng, Janaki Sharma, Elizabeth Ravera, Balazs Halmos, Haiying Cheng","doi":"10.2147/LCTT.S173948","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S173948","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alectinib can cause rare, but severe hypersensitivity. The cross-reactivity between different ALK inhibitors is unknown and desensitization is the only reported management. We hereby report the first case of severe delayed hypersensitivity developed in a lung cancer patient treated by alectinib, who was successfully managed by switching to brigatinib, another ALK inhibitor. The patient achieved excellent anti-tumor response to brigatinib. Our case provides an alternative and safe strategy in patients with alectinib-related hypersensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":18066,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","volume":"9 ","pages":"73-77"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2018-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LCTT.S173948","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36504509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-08-24eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.2147/LCTT.S166320
Denise Albano, Thomas Bilfinger, Barbara Nemesure
Background: Lobectomy has traditionally been recommended for fit patients diagnosed with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, however, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been introduced as an alternative treatment option. The purpose of this investigation is to compare survival outcomes for individuals with stage I/II NSCLC treated with lobectomy vs SBRT.
Methods: This retrospective study included 191 patients (100 surgery, 91 SBRT) identified through the Lung Cancer Evaluation Center, Stony Brook, NY, between 2008 and 2012. Survival and recurrence rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard models to adjust for possible confounders. A subset of cases was propensity-matched to address potential differences in health status between groups.
Results: 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival outcomes were significantly better among patients undergoing lobectomy vs SBRT. Survival rates at 3 years were 92.8% and 59.0% (p<0.001) in the 2 groups, respectively. Propensity-matched analyses indicated similar findings. Recurrence rates were likewise lower among patients undergoing surgery (7.1% vs 21.0%, p<0.01 at 3 years); however, statistical significance was not maintained in the propensity-matched analysis.
Conclusion: These findings add to a growing evidence base supporting the use of lobectomy vs SBRT in the treatment of lung cancer among healthy, early-stage NSCLC patients.
{"title":"1-, 3-, and 5-year survival among early-stage lung cancer patients treated with lobectomy vs SBRT.","authors":"Denise Albano, Thomas Bilfinger, Barbara Nemesure","doi":"10.2147/LCTT.S166320","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S166320","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lobectomy has traditionally been recommended for fit patients diagnosed with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, however, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been introduced as an alternative treatment option. The purpose of this investigation is to compare survival outcomes for individuals with stage I/II NSCLC treated with lobectomy vs SBRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 191 patients (100 surgery, 91 SBRT) identified through the Lung Cancer Evaluation Center, Stony Brook, NY, between 2008 and 2012. Survival and recurrence rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard models to adjust for possible confounders. A subset of cases was propensity-matched to address potential differences in health status between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1-, 3-, and 5-year survival outcomes were significantly better among patients undergoing lobectomy vs SBRT. Survival rates at 3 years were 92.8% and 59.0% (<i>p</i><0.001) in the 2 groups, respectively. Propensity-matched analyses indicated similar findings. Recurrence rates were likewise lower among patients undergoing surgery (7.1% vs 21.0%, <i>p</i><0.01 at 3 years); however, statistical significance was not maintained in the propensity-matched analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings add to a growing evidence base supporting the use of lobectomy vs SBRT in the treatment of lung cancer among healthy, early-stage NSCLC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18066,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","volume":"9 ","pages":"65-71"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2018-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LCTT.S166320","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36476587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Over 10% of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients have brain metastases (BM) at initial diagnosis; more than 50% will develop BM within 2 years. BM are detected in up to 80% of all patients at autopsy. After primary treatment, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been established as standard of care in SCLC patients responding to initial therapy. Based on level I evidence, PCI significantly decreases the risk of intracranial relapse and shows a modest survival benefit after 3 years. However, the role of PCI in defined patient subgroups such as resected SCLC, elderly and extensive stage patients with access to magnetic resonance imaging surveillance and stereotactic radiotherapy is yet to be fully clarified. Furthermore, strategies to effective prevention of neurocognitive decline after PCI remain unclear. All these factors significantly impact treatment decision making and should be evaluated in prospective settings. New concepts such as hippocampal avoidance and drug neuroprotection prevent chronic neurocognitive effects reducing treatment-related side effects of PCI. The aim of this review is to present a summary and update of the latest evidence for patient selection, efficacy and outcome of PCI.
{"title":"Prophylactic cranial irradiation in small-cell lung cancer: update on patient selection, efficacy and outcomes.","authors":"Farkhad Manapov, Lukas Käsmann, Olarn Roengvoraphoj, Maurice Dantes, Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann, Claus Belka, Chukwuka Eze","doi":"10.2147/LCTT.S137577","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S137577","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over 10% of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients have brain metastases (BM) at initial diagnosis; more than 50% will develop BM within 2 years. BM are detected in up to 80% of all patients at autopsy. After primary treatment, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been established as standard of care in SCLC patients responding to initial therapy. Based on level I evidence, PCI significantly decreases the risk of intracranial relapse and shows a modest survival benefit after 3 years. However, the role of PCI in defined patient subgroups such as resected SCLC, elderly and extensive stage patients with access to magnetic resonance imaging surveillance and stereotactic radiotherapy is yet to be fully clarified. Furthermore, strategies to effective prevention of neurocognitive decline after PCI remain unclear. All these factors significantly impact treatment decision making and should be evaluated in prospective settings. New concepts such as hippocampal avoidance and drug neuroprotection prevent chronic neurocognitive effects reducing treatment-related side effects of PCI. The aim of this review is to present a summary and update of the latest evidence for patient selection, efficacy and outcome of PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":18066,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","volume":"9 ","pages":"49-55"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2018-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LCTT.S137577","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36631944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-05-18eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.2147/LCTT.S161738
Ankur R Parikh, Siraj M Ali, Alexa B Schrock, Lee A Albacker, Vincent A Miller, Phil J Stephens, Pamela Crilley, Maurie Markman
In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) refractory to standard therapy and which lacks well-known oncogenic drivers, genomic profiling can still identify genomic alterations that may suggest potential sensitivity to targeted therapy. PTEN mutation in NSCLC may be sensitizing to analogs of rapamycin such as everolimus or temsirolimus, but more investigation is needed. We report the case of a patient with metastatic NSCLC harboring a PTEN mutation as well as high tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 positivity with a durable response to temsirolimus, but refractory to a checkpoint inhibitor. Even in the event of failure of treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in the background of a case with a higher tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 positivity, targeting specific genomic alterations may still result in patient benefit.
{"title":"Response to rapamycin analogs but not PD-1 inhibitors in PTEN-mutated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer with high tumor mutational burden.","authors":"Ankur R Parikh, Siraj M Ali, Alexa B Schrock, Lee A Albacker, Vincent A Miller, Phil J Stephens, Pamela Crilley, Maurie Markman","doi":"10.2147/LCTT.S161738","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S161738","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) refractory to standard therapy and which lacks well-known oncogenic drivers, genomic profiling can still identify genomic alterations that may suggest potential sensitivity to targeted therapy. PTEN mutation in NSCLC may be sensitizing to analogs of rapamycin such as everolimus or temsirolimus, but more investigation is needed. We report the case of a patient with metastatic NSCLC harboring a PTEN mutation as well as high tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 positivity with a durable response to temsirolimus, but refractory to a checkpoint inhibitor. Even in the event of failure of treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in the background of a case with a higher tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 positivity, targeting specific genomic alterations may still result in patient benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":18066,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","volume":"9 ","pages":"45-47"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2018-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LCTT.S161738","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36174135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-03-27eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.2147/LCTT.S124483
Eloise Mastrangelo, Mario Milani
GLI1 is a transcriptional regulator involved in the development of different types of cancer. GLI1 transcriptional activity is regulated within the Hedgehog pathway (canonical activity), but can also be controlled independently (non-canonical activity) in the context of other signaling pathways. Experimental evidences show GLI1 involvement in both small- and non-small-cell lung cancers. Direct inhibition of the protein, in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents, represents a promising strategy for the treatment of different malignancies.
{"title":"Role and inhibition of GLI1 protein in cancer.","authors":"Eloise Mastrangelo, Mario Milani","doi":"10.2147/LCTT.S124483","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S124483","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>GLI1 is a transcriptional regulator involved in the development of different types of cancer. GLI1 transcriptional activity is regulated within the Hedgehog pathway (canonical activity), but can also be controlled independently (non-canonical activity) in the context of other signaling pathways. Experimental evidences show GLI1 involvement in both small- and non-small-cell lung cancers. Direct inhibition of the protein, in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents, represents a promising strategy for the treatment of different malignancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18066,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","volume":"9 ","pages":"35-43"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2018-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LCTT.S124483","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35985736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-03-23eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.2147/LCTT.S154116
Elisna Syahruddin, Laksmi Wulandari, Nunuk Sri Muktiati, Ana Rima, Noni Soeroso, Sabrina Ermayanti, Michael Levi, Heriawaty Hidajat, Grace Widjajahakim, Ahmad Rusdan Handoyo Utomo
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the distribution of individual epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation subtypes found in routine cytological specimens.
Patients and methods: A retrospective audit was performed on EGFR testing results of 1,874 consecutive cytological samples of newly diagnosed or treatment-naïve Indonesian lung cancer patients (years 2015-2016). Testing was performed by ISO15189 accredited central laboratory.
Results: Overall test failure rate was 5.1%, with the highest failure (7.1%) observed in pleural effusion and lowest (1.6%) in needle aspiration samples. EGFR mutation frequency was 44.4%. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-sensitive common EGFR mutations (ins/dels exon 19, L858R) and uncommon mutations (G719X, T790M, L861Q) contributed 57.1% and 29%, respectively. Approximately 13.9% of mutation-positive patients carried a mixture of common and uncommon mutations. Women had higher EGFR mutation rate (52.9%) vs men (39.1%; p<0.05). In contrast, uncommon mutations conferring either TKI responsive (G719X, L861Q) or TKI resistance (T790M, exon 20 insertions) were consistently more frequent in men than in women (67.3% vs 32.7% or 69.4% vs 30.6%; p<0.05). Up to 10% EGFR mutation-positive patients had baseline single mutation T790M, exon 20 insertion, or in coexistence with TKI-sensitive mutations. Up to 9% patients had complex or multiple EGFR mutations, whereby 48.7% patients harbored TKI-resistant mutations. One patient presented third-generation TKI-resistant mutation L792F simultaneously with T790M.
Conclusion: Routine diagnostic cytological techniques yielded similar success rate to detect EGFR mutations. Uncommon EGFR mutations were frequent events in Indonesian lung cancer patients.
{"title":"Uncommon <i>EGFR</i> mutations in cytological specimens of 1,874 newly diagnosed Indonesian lung cancer patients.","authors":"Elisna Syahruddin, Laksmi Wulandari, Nunuk Sri Muktiati, Ana Rima, Noni Soeroso, Sabrina Ermayanti, Michael Levi, Heriawaty Hidajat, Grace Widjajahakim, Ahmad Rusdan Handoyo Utomo","doi":"10.2147/LCTT.S154116","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S154116","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the distribution of individual epidermal growth factor receptor (<i>EGFR</i>) mutation subtypes found in routine cytological specimens.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective audit was performed on <i>EGFR</i> testing results of 1,874 consecutive cytological samples of newly diagnosed or treatment-naïve Indonesian lung cancer patients (years 2015-2016). Testing was performed by ISO15189 accredited central laboratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall test failure rate was 5.1%, with the highest failure (7.1%) observed in pleural effusion and lowest (1.6%) in needle aspiration samples. <i>EGFR</i> mutation frequency was 44.4%. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-sensitive common <i>EGFR</i> mutations (ins/dels exon 19, L858R) and uncommon mutations (G719X, T790M, L861Q) contributed 57.1% and 29%, respectively. Approximately 13.9% of mutation-positive patients carried a mixture of common and uncommon mutations. Women had higher <i>EGFR</i> mutation rate (52.9%) vs men (39.1%; <i>p</i><0.05). In contrast, uncommon mutations conferring either TKI responsive (G719X, L861Q) or TKI resistance (T790M, exon 20 insertions) were consistently more frequent in men than in women (67.3% vs 32.7% or 69.4% vs 30.6%; <i>p</i><0.05). Up to 10% <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive patients had baseline single mutation T790M, exon 20 insertion, or in coexistence with TKI-sensitive mutations. Up to 9% patients had complex or multiple <i>EGFR</i> mutations, whereby 48.7% patients harbored TKI-resistant mutations. One patient presented third-generation TKI-resistant mutation L792F simultaneously with T790M.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine diagnostic cytological techniques yielded similar success rate to detect <i>EGFR</i> mutations. Uncommon <i>EGFR</i> mutations were frequent events in Indonesian lung cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18066,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","volume":"9 ","pages":"25-34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2018-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LCTT.S154116","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35976228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-03-16eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.2147/LCTT.S129833
Elysia K Donovan, Anand Swaminath
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a new technology in radiotherapy delivery, allowing for potentially curative treatment in many patients previously felt not to be candidates for radical surgical resection of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several studies have demonstrated very high local control rates using SBRT, and more recent data have suggested overall survival may approach that of surgery in operable patients. However, SBRT is not without unique toxicities, and the balance of toxicity, and effect on patient-reported quality of life need to be considered with respect to oncologic outcomes. We therefore aim to review SBRT in the context of important patient-related factors, including quality of life in several domains (and in comparison to other therapies such as conventional radiation, surgery, or no treatment). We will also describe scenarios in which SBRT may be reasonably offered (i.e. elderly patients and those with severe COPD), and where it may need to be approached with some caution due to increased risks of toxicity (i.e. tumor location, patients with interstitial lung disease). In total, we hope to characterize the physical, emotional, and functional consequences of SBRT, in relation to other management strategies, in order to aid the clinician in deciding whether SBRT is the optimal treatment choice for each patient with early stage NSCLC.
{"title":"Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer: Clinical impact and patient perspectives.","authors":"Elysia K Donovan, Anand Swaminath","doi":"10.2147/LCTT.S129833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S129833","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a new technology in radiotherapy delivery, allowing for potentially curative treatment in many patients previously felt not to be candidates for radical surgical resection of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several studies have demonstrated very high local control rates using SBRT, and more recent data have suggested overall survival may approach that of surgery in operable patients. However, SBRT is not without unique toxicities, and the balance of toxicity, and effect on patient-reported quality of life need to be considered with respect to oncologic outcomes. We therefore aim to review SBRT in the context of important patient-related factors, including quality of life in several domains (and in comparison to other therapies such as conventional radiation, surgery, or no treatment). We will also describe scenarios in which SBRT may be reasonably offered (i.e. elderly patients and those with severe COPD), and where it may need to be approached with some caution due to increased risks of toxicity (i.e. tumor location, patients with interstitial lung disease). In total, we hope to characterize the physical, emotional, and functional consequences of SBRT, in relation to other management strategies, in order to aid the clinician in deciding whether SBRT is the optimal treatment choice for each patient with early stage NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":18066,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","volume":"9 ","pages":"13-23"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2018-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LCTT.S129833","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35956431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-01-03eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.2147/LCTT.S147841
Vidya H Veldore, Anuradha Choughule, Tejaswi Routhu, Nitin Mandloi, Vanita Noronha, Amit Joshi, Amit Dutt, Ravi Gupta, Ramprasad Vedam, Kumar Prabhash
Plasma cell-free tumor DNA, or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), from liquid biopsy is a potential source of tumor genetic material, in the absence of tissue biopsy, for EGFR testing. Our validation study reiterates the clinical utility of ctDNA next generation sequencing (NGS) for EGFR mutation testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 163 NSCLC cases were included in the validation, of which 132 patients had paired tissue biopsy and ctDNA. We chose to validate ctDNA using deep sequencing with custom designed bioinformatics methods that could detect somatic mutations at allele frequencies as low as 0.01%. Benchmarking allele specific real time PCR as one of the standard methods for tissue-based EGFR mutation testing, the ctDNA NGS test was validated on all the plasma derived cell-free DNA samples. We observed a high concordance (96.96%) between tissue biopsy and ctDNA for oncogenic driver mutations in Exon 19 and Exon 21 of the EGFR gene. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of the assay were 91.1%, 100% 100%, 95.6%, and 97%, respectively. A false negative rate of 3% was observed. A subset of mutations was also verified on droplet digital PCR. Sixteen percent EGFR mutation positivity was observed in patients where only liquid biopsy was available, thus creating options for targeted therapy. This is the first and largest study from India, demonstrating successful validation of circulating cell-free DNA as a clinically useful material for molecular testing in NSCLC.
{"title":"Validation of liquid biopsy: plasma cell-free DNA testing in clinical management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Vidya H Veldore, Anuradha Choughule, Tejaswi Routhu, Nitin Mandloi, Vanita Noronha, Amit Joshi, Amit Dutt, Ravi Gupta, Ramprasad Vedam, Kumar Prabhash","doi":"10.2147/LCTT.S147841","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S147841","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plasma cell-free tumor DNA, or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), from liquid biopsy is a potential source of tumor genetic material, in the absence of tissue biopsy, for <i>EGFR</i> testing. Our validation study reiterates the clinical utility of ctDNA next generation sequencing (NGS) for EGFR mutation testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 163 NSCLC cases were included in the validation, of which 132 patients had paired tissue biopsy and ctDNA. We chose to validate ctDNA using deep sequencing with custom designed bioinformatics methods that could detect somatic mutations at allele frequencies as low as 0.01%. Benchmarking allele specific real time PCR as one of the standard methods for tissue-based <i>EGFR</i> mutation testing, the ctDNA NGS test was validated on all the plasma derived cell-free DNA samples. We observed a high concordance (96.96%) between tissue biopsy and ctDNA for oncogenic driver mutations in Exon 19 and Exon 21 of the <i>EGFR</i> gene. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of the assay were 91.1%, 100% 100%, 95.6%, and 97%, respectively. A false negative rate of 3% was observed. A subset of mutations was also verified on droplet digital PCR. Sixteen percent EGFR mutation positivity was observed in patients where only liquid biopsy was available, thus creating options for targeted therapy. This is the first and largest study from India, demonstrating successful validation of circulating cell-free DNA as a clinically useful material for molecular testing in NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":18066,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy","volume":"9 ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2018-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LCTT.S147841","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35776290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}