Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2023-001131
Fatma El Hadiyen, Michel W P Tsang-A-Sjoe, Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte, Alexandre E Voskuyl, Irene E M Bultink
Objective: To determine whether intercurrent infections are a risk factor for subsequent disease flares in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Methods: Demographic and clinical characteristics of 203 patients with SLE participating in the Amsterdam SLE cohort were collected at baseline and during follow-up. Collection of data on infections and SLE flares was registry-based and infections and flares were categorised as minor or major, based on predefined criteria. Proportional hazard models with recurrent events and time-varying covariates were used to estimate the HR of SLE flares.
Results: The incidence rates of major and minor infections were 5.3 per 100 patient years and 63.9 per 100 patient years, respectively. The incidence rates of flares were 3.6 and 15.1 per 100 patient years for major flares and minor flares, respectively.In the proportional hazard model, intercurrent infections (major and minor combined) were associated with the occurrence of SLE flares (major and minor combined; HR 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3 to 2.9). The hazard ratio for a major SLE flare following a major infection was 7.4 (95% CI: 2.2 to 24.6). Major infections were not associated with the occurrence of minor flares.
Conclusions: The results of the present study show that intercurrent infections are associated with subsequent SLE flares, which supports the hypothesis that infections may trigger SLE flares.
{"title":"Intercurrent infection as a risk factor for disease flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.","authors":"Fatma El Hadiyen, Michel W P Tsang-A-Sjoe, Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte, Alexandre E Voskuyl, Irene E M Bultink","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2023-001131","DOIUrl":"10.1136/lupus-2023-001131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether intercurrent infections are a risk factor for subsequent disease flares in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic and clinical characteristics of 203 patients with SLE participating in the Amsterdam SLE cohort were collected at baseline and during follow-up. Collection of data on infections and SLE flares was registry-based and infections and flares were categorised as minor or major, based on predefined criteria. Proportional hazard models with recurrent events and time-varying covariates were used to estimate the HR of SLE flares.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence rates of major and minor infections were 5.3 per 100 patient years and 63.9 per 100 patient years, respectively. The incidence rates of flares were 3.6 and 15.1 per 100 patient years for major flares and minor flares, respectively.In the proportional hazard model, intercurrent infections (major and minor combined) were associated with the occurrence of SLE flares (major and minor combined; HR 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3 to 2.9). The hazard ratio for a major SLE flare following a major infection was 7.4 (95% CI: 2.2 to 24.6). Major infections were not associated with the occurrence of minor flares.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the present study show that intercurrent infections are associated with subsequent SLE flares, which supports the hypothesis that infections may trigger SLE flares.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11217993/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141492479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001305
Katrina Guardino, Malaya Gaerlan, Caitlan S Pinotti, Kimberly R Burnett, Deborah Kofoed, Laura Eve Schanberg, Lisa B Hightow-Weidman, Rachel L Randell
Paediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) management and research could be enhanced by a mobile health application (app); however, no app designed for pSLE is currently available. A development and design committee comprising of patients, parents/caregivers and other stakeholders met to inform development and design of an app specific for pSLE. This meeting report summarises the group’s discussions and recommendations that could help create a useful and desirable app or mobile health tool for the pSLE community.
{"title":"Meeting report: patient and caregiver recommendations for a mobile health application for paediatric systemic lupus erythematosus","authors":"Katrina Guardino, Malaya Gaerlan, Caitlan S Pinotti, Kimberly R Burnett, Deborah Kofoed, Laura Eve Schanberg, Lisa B Hightow-Weidman, Rachel L Randell","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001305","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2024-001305","url":null,"abstract":"Paediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) management and research could be enhanced by a mobile health application (app); however, no app designed for pSLE is currently available. A development and design committee comprising of patients, parents/caregivers and other stakeholders met to inform development and design of an app specific for pSLE. This meeting report summarises the group’s discussions and recommendations that could help create a useful and desirable app or mobile health tool for the pSLE community.","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141871711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-21DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001146
Lin Peng, Pengcheng Wang, Xiaodong Xu, Dacheng Chen, Feng Xu, Fan Yang, Shuying Yang, Hongguang Xia, Zhi-Hong Liu, Weisong Qin
Objective: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a type of autoimmune disease that involves multiple organs involved as well as cytokine dysregulation. The treatment of SLE is still challenging due to the side effects of the different drugs used. Receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) is a kinase involved in T cell homeostasis and autoinflammation. Although clinical trials have shown that RIPK1 inhibition exhibits significant efficacy in different autoimmune diseases, its role in SLE remains unclear.
Methods: MRL/lpr lupus-prone mice received RIPK1 inhibitor ZJU37 or vehicle intraperitoneally for 10 weeks. A BM12-induced chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGVHD) lupus-like model was introduced in RIPK1 D138N mice or C57BL/6 mice. Nephritis, serum autoantibody levels, dysregulation of adaptive immune response and cytokines were compared in treated and untreated mice.
Results: ZJU37 alleviated the clinical features of the MRL/lpr mice including nephritis and anti-dsDNA antibody production. In addition, ZJU37 treatment reduced the proportion of double-negative T cells in the spleen and the cytokines of TNFα, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-17 and IL-1β in the serum. Moreover, RIPK1 D138N mice were able to prevent the cGVHD lupus-like model from SLE attack, manifesting as anti-dsDNA antibody production, the proliferation of germinal centre B cells, plasma cells, and T follicular helper cells as well as IgG and C3 deposits in kidneys.
Conclusion: RIPK1 inhibition has a protective effect in the mouse model of SLE and can potentially become a new therapeutic target for SLE in humans.
{"title":"Inhibition of receptor interacting protein kinase-1 (RIPK1) in the treatment of murine lupus.","authors":"Lin Peng, Pengcheng Wang, Xiaodong Xu, Dacheng Chen, Feng Xu, Fan Yang, Shuying Yang, Hongguang Xia, Zhi-Hong Liu, Weisong Qin","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001146","DOIUrl":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001146","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a type of autoimmune disease that involves multiple organs involved as well as cytokine dysregulation. The treatment of SLE is still challenging due to the side effects of the different drugs used. Receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) is a kinase involved in T cell homeostasis and autoinflammation. Although clinical trials have shown that RIPK1 inhibition exhibits significant efficacy in different autoimmune diseases, its role in SLE remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MRL/lpr lupus-prone mice received RIPK1 inhibitor ZJU37 or vehicle intraperitoneally for 10 weeks. A BM12-induced chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGVHD) lupus-like model was introduced in RIPK1 D138N mice or C57BL/6 mice. Nephritis, serum autoantibody levels, dysregulation of adaptive immune response and cytokines were compared in treated and untreated mice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ZJU37 alleviated the clinical features of the MRL/lpr mice including nephritis and anti-dsDNA antibody production. In addition, ZJU37 treatment reduced the proportion of double-negative T cells in the spleen and the cytokines of TNFα, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-17 and IL-1β in the serum. Moreover, RIPK1 D138N mice were able to prevent the cGVHD lupus-like model from SLE attack, manifesting as anti-dsDNA antibody production, the proliferation of germinal centre B cells, plasma cells, and T follicular helper cells as well as IgG and C3 deposits in kidneys.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RIPK1 inhibition has a protective effect in the mouse model of SLE and can potentially become a new therapeutic target for SLE in humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11191810/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141437117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-13DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001194
Coziana Ciurtin, Junjie Peng, Yiming Gao, Misato Niwa, Stacy P Ardoin, Laura Eve Schanberg, Laura Lewandowski, Elizabeth C Jury, George A Robinson
{"title":"Investigation of the performance of validated cardiovascular risk scores in a global (UK/US) cohort of young people with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.","authors":"Coziana Ciurtin, Junjie Peng, Yiming Gao, Misato Niwa, Stacy P Ardoin, Laura Eve Schanberg, Laura Lewandowski, Elizabeth C Jury, George A Robinson","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001194","DOIUrl":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001194","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11177662/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141317579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-10DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001196
Jinlu Ma, Lin Zhang, Mengxue Yan, Zhichun Liu, Leixi Xue
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) for assessing disease activity in patients with SLE.
Methods: Clinical data were collected from patients with SLE who were admitted at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2009 to December 2022. The glucocorticoid dose grading was used as the gold standard for disease activity assessment in SLE. The SLE-DAS value was calculated, and the SLE disease activity status was graded based on the SLE-DAS value. Another scoring criterion, the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI 2000), served as a control. Spearman correlation analysis was used to calculate the correlation between the scoring criteria and other variables.
Results: The analysis included 396 patients with SLE. A strong correlation was found between SLE-DAS and SLEDAI 2000 (ρ=0.709, 95% CI 0.648 to 0.766, p<0.001), with median SLE-DAS and SLEDAI 2000 scores of 15.32 (7.90 to 24.45) and 13 (8 to 19), respectively. Compared with the SLEDAI 2000 value, the SLE-DAS value correlated better with glucocorticoid dose grading (ρ=0.434 vs 0.518), gammaglobulin use (ρ=0.170 vs 0.318) and immunosuppressant use (ρ=0.122 vs 0.221). A moderate correlation based on disease activity grading was found between SLE-DAS and glucocorticoid dose grading (ρ=0.441), whereas a mild correlation was observed between SLEDAI 2000 and glucocorticoid dose grading (ρ=0.325). Additionally, SLE-DAS revealed a positive correlation with severe thrombocytopenia, cardiac involvement and pulmonary involvement but not SLEDAI 2000.
Conclusion: Compared with SLEDAI 2000, SLE-DAS may provide a more accurate disease activity assessment in patients with SLE, especially those with severe thrombocytopenia and cardiopulmonary involvement.
{"title":"Value of SLE-DAS in assessing disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-centre retrospective study.","authors":"Jinlu Ma, Lin Zhang, Mengxue Yan, Zhichun Liu, Leixi Xue","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001196","DOIUrl":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001196","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) for assessing disease activity in patients with SLE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data were collected from patients with SLE who were admitted at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2009 to December 2022. The glucocorticoid dose grading was used as the gold standard for disease activity assessment in SLE. The SLE-DAS value was calculated, and the SLE disease activity status was graded based on the SLE-DAS value. Another scoring criterion, the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI 2000), served as a control. Spearman correlation analysis was used to calculate the correlation between the scoring criteria and other variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 396 patients with SLE. A strong correlation was found between SLE-DAS and SLEDAI 2000 (ρ=0.709, 95% CI 0.648 to 0.766, p<0.001), with median SLE-DAS and SLEDAI 2000 scores of 15.32 (7.90 to 24.45) and 13 (8 to 19), respectively. Compared with the SLEDAI 2000 value, the SLE-DAS value correlated better with glucocorticoid dose grading (ρ=0.434 vs 0.518), gammaglobulin use (ρ=0.170 vs 0.318) and immunosuppressant use (ρ=0.122 vs 0.221). A moderate correlation based on disease activity grading was found between SLE-DAS and glucocorticoid dose grading (ρ=0.441), whereas a mild correlation was observed between SLEDAI 2000 and glucocorticoid dose grading (ρ=0.325). Additionally, SLE-DAS revealed a positive correlation with severe thrombocytopenia, cardiac involvement and pulmonary involvement but not SLEDAI 2000.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with SLEDAI 2000, SLE-DAS may provide a more accurate disease activity assessment in patients with SLE, especially those with severe thrombocytopenia and cardiopulmonary involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11168181/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141306266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) has a broad spectrum and to date, there is no gold-standard biomarker. The diagnosis relies on clinical assessment, supporting examinations and exclusion of other possible aetiologies. One method that can be used to establish NPSLE is to conduct a re-evaluation by involving several fields of medical science. This study aims to reassess SLE cases with neuropsychiatric (NP) manifestations through multidisciplinary re-evaluation and determine the final diagnosis of NPSLE or non-NPSLE.
Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study used medical record data from patients with SLE with NP manifestations. Inclusion criteria included patients diagnosed with SLE, who had clinical manifestations of NP and were >18 years old. Multidisciplinary re-evaluation was conducted and agreed upon the diagnosis of NPSLE or non-NPSLE.
Results: We included 94 subjects with a total of 132 NP events consisting of 69 NPSLE and 63 non-NPSLE. After re-evaluating NPSLE events, 33.3% were still concluded to be NPSLE. Meanwhile, from the non-NPSLE group, 22.2% were then declared as NPSLE. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the NPSLE and non-NPSLE groups. The proportion of NP events in both groups was almost the same except for cerebrovascular disease manifestations which were more common in the NPSLE group. Higher Mexican SLE Disease Activity Index scores with (p<0.001) or without NP (p=0.02) were observed in the NPSLE group compared with the non-NPSLE group, as well as higher proportion of active disease (p=0.03), higher anti-double-stranded DNA titres (p<0.001) and lower values of C3 (p=0.018) and C4 (p=0.001).
Conclusions: Multidisciplinary re-evaluation can be used as a method to confirm the diagnosis of NPSLE. There is a tendency for overdiagnosis of NPSLE when clinicians are faced with NP events in patients with SLE. Complete clinical and supporting data are needed to determine the final diagnosis of NPSLE.
{"title":"Multidisciplinary re-evaluation of neuropsychiatric events to confirm the neuropsychiatric lupus diagnosis at an Indonesian tertiary hospital.","authors":"Riwanti Estiasari, Syairah Banu, Alvina Widhani, Fitri Octaviana, Kartika Maharani, Tiara Aninditha, Muthia Huda Islami, Darma Imran, Diatri Nari Lastri","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001163","DOIUrl":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001163","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) has a broad spectrum and to date, there is no gold-standard biomarker. The diagnosis relies on clinical assessment, supporting examinations and exclusion of other possible aetiologies. One method that can be used to establish NPSLE is to conduct a re-evaluation by involving several fields of medical science. This study aims to reassess SLE cases with neuropsychiatric (NP) manifestations through multidisciplinary re-evaluation and determine the final diagnosis of NPSLE or non-NPSLE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study used medical record data from patients with SLE with NP manifestations. Inclusion criteria included patients diagnosed with SLE, who had clinical manifestations of NP and were >18 years old. Multidisciplinary re-evaluation was conducted and agreed upon the diagnosis of NPSLE or non-NPSLE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 94 subjects with a total of 132 NP events consisting of 69 NPSLE and 63 non-NPSLE. After re-evaluating NPSLE events, 33.3% were still concluded to be NPSLE. Meanwhile, from the non-NPSLE group, 22.2% were then declared as NPSLE. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the NPSLE and non-NPSLE groups. The proportion of NP events in both groups was almost the same except for cerebrovascular disease manifestations which were more common in the NPSLE group. Higher Mexican SLE Disease Activity Index scores with (p<0.001) or without NP (p=0.02) were observed in the NPSLE group compared with the non-NPSLE group, as well as higher proportion of active disease (p=0.03), higher anti-double-stranded DNA titres (p<0.001) and lower values of C3 (p=0.018) and C4 (p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidisciplinary re-evaluation can be used as a method to confirm the diagnosis of NPSLE. There is a tendency for overdiagnosis of NPSLE when clinicians are faced with NP events in patients with SLE. Complete clinical and supporting data are needed to determine the final diagnosis of NPSLE.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163663/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141293552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-28DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001156
Liling Zhao, Wenwen Wang, Lijun Wu, Tong Wu, Jianxin Tu, Xue Wu, Fangfang Sun, Huihua Ding, Nan Shen, Huaxiang Wu, Jing Zhu, Li Sun, Shuang Ye
Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of belimumab on active lupus nephritis (LN) and explore the predictors, including serological biomarkers, of renal response to belimumab in a real-world setting.
Methods: This multicentre, real-world observational study enrolled patients with active LN receiving intravenous belimumab as an add-on therapy with 24-hour urine protein≥1 g and estimated glomerular filtration rate≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline. Complete renal response (CRR), partial renal response (PRR), no renal response (NRR) and primary efficacy renal response (PERR) were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for NRR to belimumab at 6 months.
Results: Among the 122 patients enrolled, the proportions of patients achieving CRR, PRR, NRR and PERR were 35.9%, 17.1%, 47.0% and 44.4% at 6 months (n=117) and 55.6%, 19.4%, 26.4% and 58.3% at 12 months (n=72), respectively. Proteinuria, daily prednisone dosage and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 scores significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months (p<0.0001). NRR at 6 months (NRR6) was the strongest negative predictor of CRR at 12 months. Baseline anti-dsDNA positivity inversely predicted NRR6 (OR=0.32,95% CI=0.10 to 0.98, p=0.049), while anti-SSA/Ro60 positively predicted NRR6 (OR=3.16, 95% CI=1.14 to 8.74, p=0.027). The combination of anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-dsDNA serotype quantitatively predicted belimumab renal response.
Conclusion: The effectiveness of belimumab was reproducible in Chinese patients with active LN. The simple yet interesting serotype predictive model needs further validation and its possible underlying mechanistic relevance deserves further exploration.
{"title":"Combination of anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-dsDNA serotype is predictive of belimumab renal response in patients with lupus nephritis.","authors":"Liling Zhao, Wenwen Wang, Lijun Wu, Tong Wu, Jianxin Tu, Xue Wu, Fangfang Sun, Huihua Ding, Nan Shen, Huaxiang Wu, Jing Zhu, Li Sun, Shuang Ye","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001156","DOIUrl":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001156","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of belimumab on active lupus nephritis (LN) and explore the predictors, including serological biomarkers, of renal response to belimumab in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, real-world observational study enrolled patients with active LN receiving intravenous belimumab as an add-on therapy with 24-hour urine protein≥1 g and estimated glomerular filtration rate≥30 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> at baseline. Complete renal response (CRR), partial renal response (PRR), no renal response (NRR) and primary efficacy renal response (PERR) were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for NRR to belimumab at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 122 patients enrolled, the proportions of patients achieving CRR, PRR, NRR and PERR were 35.9%, 17.1%, 47.0% and 44.4% at 6 months (n=117) and 55.6%, 19.4%, 26.4% and 58.3% at 12 months (n=72), respectively. Proteinuria, daily prednisone dosage and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 scores significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months (p<0.0001). NRR at 6 months (NRR6) was the strongest negative predictor of CRR at 12 months. Baseline anti-dsDNA positivity inversely predicted NRR6 (OR=0.32,95% CI=0.10 to 0.98, p=0.049), while anti-SSA/Ro60 positively predicted NRR6 (OR=3.16, 95% CI=1.14 to 8.74, p=0.027). The combination of anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-dsDNA serotype quantitatively predicted belimumab renal response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effectiveness of belimumab was reproducible in Chinese patients with active LN. The simple yet interesting serotype predictive model needs further validation and its possible underlying mechanistic relevance deserves further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11138273/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141162220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-24DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001158
Ibrahim Almaghlouth, Kawther Ghassan Bohuliga, Boshra Alanazi, Bushra Khaled Alhawsa, Abdulaziz Mohammed Alabdulkareem, Wael Alqarawi, Kazi Nur Asfina, Najma Khalil, Hebatallah Hamed Ali, Mohammed Bedaiwi, Aos Aboabat, Jiandong Su, Tariq Asef Alam, Fehaid Ghali Alanazi, Mohammed A Omair, Abdurhman S Alarfaj, Haya M Almalag, Mostafa Al Shamiri, Khalid F Alhabib
Objective: This study examined the prevalence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among Saudi patients with SLE and the general population and considered factors associated with such outcomes were taken into consideration.
Methods: This is a cohort study evaluating the period prevalence of MACE from 2020 to 2023. The study used two datasets, namely the Saudi national prospective cohort for SLE patients and the Prospective Urban-Rural Epidemiology Study Saudi subcohort (PURE-Saudi) for the general population. Participants in both studies were monitored using a standardised protocol. MACE was defined as myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or angina. The analysis was adjusted for demographics, traditional cardiovascular risk factors and SLE diagnosis through logistic regression models.
Results: The PURE and national SLE cohorts comprised 488 and 746 patients, respectively. Patients with SLE from the SLE cohort were younger (40.7±12.5 vs 49.5±8.6 years) and predominantly female (90.6% vs 41.6%). The prevalence of traditional risk factors was greater in the PURE cohort compared with the SLE cohort. These factors included dyslipidaemia (28.9% vs 49.4%), obesity (63% vs 85%) and diabetes (7.8% vs 27.2%), but not hypertension (19.3% vs 18.8%). MACE (defined as MI or stroke or venous thromboembolism or heart failure) occurred more frequently in patients with SLE (4.3% vs 1.6%, p=0.004). Older age and lupus diagnosis were independently associated with MACE after adjusting for conventional risk factors. The odds of MACE were significantly related to age and lupus diagnosis (p=0.00 and p=0.00, respectively), but not cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (p=0.83).
Conclusion: Patients with SLE have a significantly higher risk of developing MACE than the general population. This risk is not well explained by traditional risk factors, which may explain the failure of CVD risk scores to stratify patients with SLE adequately. Further studies are needed to understand CVD risk's pathogenesis in SLE and mitigate it.
目的:本研究调查了沙特系统性红斑狼疮患者和普通人群中主要心血管不良事件(MACE)的发生率,并考虑了与此类结果相关的因素:本研究调查了沙特系统性红斑狼疮患者和普通人群中主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生率,并考虑了与此类结果相关的因素:这是一项队列研究,评估了 2020 年至 2023 年期间 MACE 的发生率。该研究使用了两个数据集,即针对系统性红斑狼疮患者的沙特国家前瞻性队列和针对普通人群的沙特城乡流行病学前瞻性研究沙特子队列(PURE-Saudi)。这两项研究的参与者都接受了标准化方案的监测。MACE定义为心肌梗死(MI)、中风或心绞痛。分析结果通过逻辑回归模型对人口统计学、传统心血管风险因素和系统性红斑狼疮诊断进行了调整:PURE 和全国系统性红斑狼疮队列中分别有 488 名和 746 名患者。系统性红斑狼疮队列中的系统性红斑狼疮患者更年轻(40.7±12.5 岁 vs 49.5±8.6岁),以女性为主(90.6% vs 41.6%)。与系统性红斑狼疮队列相比,PURE 队列中传统风险因素的发生率更高。这些因素包括血脂异常(28.9% 对 49.4%)、肥胖(63% 对 85%)和糖尿病(7.8% 对 27.2%),但不包括高血压(19.3% 对 18.8%)。系统性红斑狼疮患者的MACE(定义为心肌梗死或中风或静脉血栓栓塞或心力衰竭)发生率更高(4.3% vs 1.6%,P=0.004)。在对常规风险因素进行调整后,高龄和狼疮诊断与MACE独立相关。MACE的几率与年龄和狼疮诊断有明显关系(分别为p=0.00和p=0.00),但与心血管疾病(CVD)风险因素无关(p=0.83):结论:系统性红斑狼疮患者发生MACE的风险明显高于普通人群。结论:系统性红斑狼疮患者罹患MACE的风险明显高于普通人群,而传统的风险因素并不能很好地解释这种风险,这可能是心血管疾病风险评分未能对系统性红斑狼疮患者进行充分分层的原因。要了解系统性红斑狼疮患者心血管疾病风险的发病机理并降低其风险,还需要进一步的研究。
{"title":"Prevalence of major adverse cardiovascular events among Saudi patients with systemic lupus erythematosus compared with the general population: updates from the national SLE and PURE cohorts.","authors":"Ibrahim Almaghlouth, Kawther Ghassan Bohuliga, Boshra Alanazi, Bushra Khaled Alhawsa, Abdulaziz Mohammed Alabdulkareem, Wael Alqarawi, Kazi Nur Asfina, Najma Khalil, Hebatallah Hamed Ali, Mohammed Bedaiwi, Aos Aboabat, Jiandong Su, Tariq Asef Alam, Fehaid Ghali Alanazi, Mohammed A Omair, Abdurhman S Alarfaj, Haya M Almalag, Mostafa Al Shamiri, Khalid F Alhabib","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001158","DOIUrl":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001158","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the prevalence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among Saudi patients with SLE and the general population and considered factors associated with such outcomes were taken into consideration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cohort study evaluating the period prevalence of MACE from 2020 to 2023. The study used two datasets, namely the Saudi national prospective cohort for SLE patients and the Prospective Urban-Rural Epidemiology Study Saudi subcohort (PURE-Saudi) for the general population. Participants in both studies were monitored using a standardised protocol. MACE was defined as myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or angina. The analysis was adjusted for demographics, traditional cardiovascular risk factors and SLE diagnosis through logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PURE and national SLE cohorts comprised 488 and 746 patients, respectively. Patients with SLE from the SLE cohort were younger (40.7±12.5 vs 49.5±8.6 years) and predominantly female (90.6% vs 41.6%). The prevalence of traditional risk factors was greater in the PURE cohort compared with the SLE cohort. These factors included dyslipidaemia (28.9% vs 49.4%), obesity (63% vs 85%) and diabetes (7.8% vs 27.2%), but not hypertension (19.3% vs 18.8%). MACE (defined as MI or stroke or venous thromboembolism or heart failure) occurred more frequently in patients with SLE (4.3% vs 1.6%, p=0.004). Older age and lupus diagnosis were independently associated with MACE after adjusting for conventional risk factors. The odds of MACE were significantly related to age and lupus diagnosis (p=0.00 and p=0.00, respectively), but not cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (p=0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with SLE have a significantly higher risk of developing MACE than the general population. This risk is not well explained by traditional risk factors, which may explain the failure of CVD risk scores to stratify patients with SLE adequately. Further studies are needed to understand CVD risk's pathogenesis in SLE and mitigate it.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129032/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141093189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-23DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000673
Kamala Vanarsa, Ting Zhang, Jack Hutcheson, Sneha Ravi Kumar, Satyavani Nukala, Haleigh Inthavong, Bruce Stanley, Tianfu Wu, C C Mok, Ramesh Saxena, Chandra Mohan
Objective: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex systemic autoimmune disorder with no reliable serum biomarkers currently available other than autoantibodies.
Methods: In the present study, isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation-based mass spectrometry was used to screen the sera of patients with SLE to uncover potential disease biomarkers.
Results: 85 common proteins were identified, with 16 being elevated (≥1.3) and 23 being decreased (≤0.7) in SLE. Of the 16 elevated proteins, serum alpha-1-microglobulin/bikunin precursor (AMBP), zinc alpha-2 glycoprotein (AZGP) and retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) were validated in independent cross-sectional cohorts (Cohort I, N=52; Cohort II, N=117) using an orthogonal platform, ELISA. Serum AMBP, AZGP and RBP4 were validated to be significantly elevated in both patients with inactive SLE and patients with active SLE compared with healthy controls (HCs) (p<0.05, fold change >2.5) in Cohort I. All three proteins exhibited good discriminatory power for distinguishing active SLE and inactive SLE (area under the curve=0.82-0.96), from HCs. Serum AMBP exhibited the largest fold change in active SLE (5.96) compared with HCs and correlated with renal disease activity. The elevation in serum AMBP was validated in a second cohort of patients with SLE of different ethnic origins, correlating with serum creatinine (r=0.60, p<0.001).
Conclusion: Since serum AMBP is validated to be elevated in SLE and correlated with renal disease, the clinical utility of this novel biomarker warrants further analysis in longitudinal cohorts of patients with lupus and lupus nephritis.
目的:系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)是一种复杂的全身性自身免疫性疾病:系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)是一种复杂的全身性自身免疫性疾病,目前除自身抗体外尚无其他可靠的血清生物标志物:本研究采用基于质谱的相对定量和绝对定量同位标记法筛选系统性红斑狼疮患者的血清,以发现潜在的疾病生物标志物:结果:共鉴定出85种常见蛋白质,其中16种在系统性红斑狼疮中升高(≥1.3),23种降低(≤0.7)。在这16种升高的蛋白质中,血清α-1-微球蛋白/比库宁前体(AMBP)、锌α-2糖蛋白(AZGP)和视黄醇结合蛋白4(RBP4)在独立的横断面队列(队列I,52人;队列II,117人)中使用正交平台ELISA进行了验证。在队列 I 中,与健康对照组(HCs)相比,非活动性系统性红斑狼疮患者和活动性系统性红斑狼疮患者的血清 AMBP、AZGP 和 RBP4 均显著升高(p2.5)。与高危人群相比,活动性系统性红斑狼疮患者血清AMBP的变化倍数最大(5.96),并与肾病活动度相关。血清 AMBP 的升高在第二组不同种族的系统性红斑狼疮患者中得到了验证,与血清肌酐相关(r=0.60,p 结论:由于系统性红斑狼疮患者血清AMBP升高并与肾脏疾病相关,因此需要在狼疮和狼疮肾炎患者的纵向队列中进一步分析这种新型生物标志物的临床实用性。
{"title":"iTRAQ-based mass spectrometry screen to identify serum biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus.","authors":"Kamala Vanarsa, Ting Zhang, Jack Hutcheson, Sneha Ravi Kumar, Satyavani Nukala, Haleigh Inthavong, Bruce Stanley, Tianfu Wu, C C Mok, Ramesh Saxena, Chandra Mohan","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2022-000673","DOIUrl":"10.1136/lupus-2022-000673","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex systemic autoimmune disorder with no reliable serum biomarkers currently available other than autoantibodies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the present study, isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation-based mass spectrometry was used to screen the sera of patients with SLE to uncover potential disease biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>85 common proteins were identified, with 16 being elevated (≥1.3) and 23 being decreased (≤0.7) in SLE. Of the 16 elevated proteins, serum alpha-1-microglobulin/bikunin precursor (AMBP), zinc alpha-2 glycoprotein (AZGP) and retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) were validated in independent cross-sectional cohorts (Cohort I, N=52; Cohort II, N=117) using an orthogonal platform, ELISA. Serum AMBP, AZGP and RBP4 were validated to be significantly elevated in both patients with inactive SLE and patients with active SLE compared with healthy controls (HCs) (p<0.05, fold change >2.5) in Cohort I. All three proteins exhibited good discriminatory power for distinguishing active SLE and inactive SLE (area under the curve=0.82-0.96), from HCs. Serum AMBP exhibited the largest fold change in active SLE (5.96) compared with HCs and correlated with renal disease activity. The elevation in serum AMBP was validated in a second cohort of patients with SLE of different ethnic origins, correlating with serum creatinine (r=0.60, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Since serum AMBP is validated to be elevated in SLE and correlated with renal disease, the clinical utility of this novel biomarker warrants further analysis in longitudinal cohorts of patients with lupus and lupus nephritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116855/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141087506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-22DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2023-001124
Anca D Askanase, Richard A Furie, Maria Dall'Era, Andrew S Bomback, Andreas Schwarting, Ming-Hui Zhao, Ian N Bruce, Munther Khamashta, Bernie Rubin, Angela Carroll, Mark Daniels, Roger Abramino Levy, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Murray B Urowitz
Our 2022 published working definition of disease modification in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was 'minimising disease activity with the fewest treatment-associated toxicities and slowing or preventing organ damage progression'. The objective of this review was to classify current SLE treatments according to the proposed non-renal disease modification criteria excluding toxicities. Based on a review of select clinical trial (n=32) and observational study (n=54) publications for 14 SLE medications across different therapeutic classes, and the authors' clinical experience, we evaluated disease modification potential as per the proposed framework at three time points. Specific criteria used to determine disease modification potential included a drug's capacity to reduce: (1) non-renal disease activity, (2) severe flares, (3) use of steroids/immunosuppressants and (4) organ damage accrual. Criteria 1-3 were assessed at 1 year and 2-5 years and, when positive, were considered evidence for disease modification potential; criterion 4 was used to confirm disease modification at >5 years. Each treatment received one of four mutually exclusive designations at each time point: (a) criterion met, (b) indications of criterion met despite insufficient evidence in the literature, (c) inconclusive and (d) no available supportive data. This review excludes an assessment of potential toxicities. Eight of the 14 SLE treatments met ≥1 disease modification criteria up to year 5. Hydroxychloroquine improved overall survival at >5 years, suggesting long-term disease modification, but no data on specific organ systems were reported. Belimumab was the only treatment to meet all criteria. Belimumab and hydroxychloroquine met disease modification definitions across three time points. Evidence for other SLE therapies was incomplete, particularly at >5 years. Future studies are warranted for other treatments to meet the disease modification criteria. We discuss challenges to classification and possible updates to our published criteria.
{"title":"Disease-modifying therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus for extrarenal manifestations.","authors":"Anca D Askanase, Richard A Furie, Maria Dall'Era, Andrew S Bomback, Andreas Schwarting, Ming-Hui Zhao, Ian N Bruce, Munther Khamashta, Bernie Rubin, Angela Carroll, Mark Daniels, Roger Abramino Levy, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Murray B Urowitz","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2023-001124","DOIUrl":"10.1136/lupus-2023-001124","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our 2022 published working definition of disease modification in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was 'minimising disease activity with the fewest treatment-associated toxicities and slowing or preventing organ damage progression'. The objective of this review was to classify current SLE treatments according to the proposed non-renal disease modification criteria excluding toxicities. Based on a review of select clinical trial (n=32) and observational study (n=54) publications for 14 SLE medications across different therapeutic classes, and the authors' clinical experience, we evaluated disease modification potential as per the proposed framework at three time points. Specific criteria used to determine disease modification potential included a drug's capacity to reduce: (1) non-renal disease activity, (2) severe flares, (3) use of steroids/immunosuppressants and (4) organ damage accrual. Criteria 1-3 were assessed at 1 year and 2-5 years and, when positive, were considered evidence for disease modification potential; criterion 4 was used to confirm disease modification at >5 years. Each treatment received one of four mutually exclusive designations at each time point: (a) criterion met, (b) indications of criterion met despite insufficient evidence in the literature, (c) inconclusive and (d) no available supportive data. This review excludes an assessment of potential toxicities. Eight of the 14 SLE treatments met ≥1 disease modification criteria up to year 5. Hydroxychloroquine improved overall survival at >5 years, suggesting long-term disease modification, but no data on specific organ systems were reported. Belimumab was the only treatment to meet all criteria. Belimumab and hydroxychloroquine met disease modification definitions across three time points. Evidence for other SLE therapies was incomplete, particularly at >5 years. Future studies are warranted for other treatments to meet the disease modification criteria. We discuss challenges to classification and possible updates to our published criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116871/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141081973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}