Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-03-07DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2472724
Xianchao Chen, Yun Huang
Background: Esophageal cancer is a common malignancy in China, with anastomotic fistula being a major postoperative complication. This study compares the clinical outcomes of end-to-end anastomosis and end-to-end anastomosis with mucosal folding and burying in minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery.
Methods: From October 2020 to March 2023, patients with esophageal cancer who underwent laparoscopic three-incision cervical anastomosis at the Fourth People's Hospital of Zigong City, were radomly assigned to receive either end-to-end anastomosis or end-to-end anastomosis followed by mucosal folding and burying. Clinical indicators, including hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic fistula, and anastomotic stenosis, were compared between the two groups.
Results: A total of 107 patients werencluded, with 56 in the end-to-end anastomosis with mucosal folding and burying technique group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic fistula rate, and anastomotic stenosis. However, for patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, the incidence of anastomotic fistula was significantly lower in the group with end-to-end anastomosis with mucosal folding and burying.
Conclusions: End-to-end anastomosis followed by mucosal folding and burying helps reduce the occurrence of anastomotic fistula, especially in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
{"title":"Clinical efficacy of end-to-end anastomosis followed by mucosal folding and burying in minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery.","authors":"Xianchao Chen, Yun Huang","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2472724","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2472724","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophageal cancer is a common malignancy in China, with anastomotic fistula being a major postoperative complication. This study compares the clinical outcomes of end-to-end anastomosis and end-to-end anastomosis with mucosal folding and burying in minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2020 to March 2023, patients with esophageal cancer who underwent laparoscopic three-incision cervical anastomosis at the Fourth People's Hospital of Zigong City, were radomly assigned to receive either end-to-end anastomosis or end-to-end anastomosis followed by mucosal folding and burying. Clinical indicators, including hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic fistula, and anastomotic stenosis, were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 patients werencluded, with 56 in the end-to-end anastomosis with mucosal folding and burying technique group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic fistula rate, and anastomotic stenosis. However, for patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, the incidence of anastomotic fistula was significantly lower in the group with end-to-end anastomosis with mucosal folding and burying.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>End-to-end anastomosis followed by mucosal folding and burying helps reduce the occurrence of anastomotic fistula, especially in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"280-289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143586289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-04-06DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2487789
Andrea Balla, Alberto Sartori, Mauro Podda, Manuel Cuevas Cabrera, Livia Bressan, Simone Rattizzato, Monica Ortenzi, Eugenio Licardie, Salvador Morales-Conde
Background: This study aims to report the currently available evidence on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in emergency settings for treating acute incarcerated/strangulated ventral, primary, or incisional hernias and compare it with the open approach.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.
Results: Six articles were included. Results of the meta-analysis based on 1720 patients and two articles show that the mean operative time was shorter in the open repair group compared to the MIS group (mean difference [MD], 39.53 min; p < 0.0002). Overall, 116 (13.6%) and 181 (20.9%) postoperative complications were observed after MIS and open repair, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.65; p = 0.61). MIS was associated with a statistically significantly lower wound complication rate than the open approach (RR, 0.43; p = 0.50). The two approaches showed equivalent results regarding return to the operative room (RR, 0.61; p = 0.13). The mean hospital stay in the MIS group was shorter than the open group (MD, -0.68; p = 0.99).
Conclusions: MIS in emergency settings seems feasible for treating acute incarcerated ventral hernias. However, due to the limitations of the included studies, the obtained evidence should be analyzed with caution. Further prospective studies are required to draw definitive conclusions.
{"title":"Minimally invasive approach in emergency for the treatment of acute incarcerated/strangulated ventral hernias. A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Andrea Balla, Alberto Sartori, Mauro Podda, Manuel Cuevas Cabrera, Livia Bressan, Simone Rattizzato, Monica Ortenzi, Eugenio Licardie, Salvador Morales-Conde","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2487789","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2487789","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to report the currently available evidence on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in emergency settings for treating acute incarcerated/strangulated ventral, primary, or incisional hernias and compare it with the open approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six articles were included. Results of the meta-analysis based on 1720 patients and two articles show that the mean operative time was shorter in the open repair group compared to the MIS group (mean difference [MD], 39.53 min; <i>p</i> < 0.0002). Overall, 116 (13.6%) and 181 (20.9%) postoperative complications were observed after MIS and open repair, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.65; <i>p</i> = 0.61). MIS was associated with a statistically significantly lower wound complication rate than the open approach (RR, 0.43; <i>p</i> = 0.50). The two approaches showed equivalent results regarding return to the operative room (RR, 0.61; <i>p</i> = 0.13). The mean hospital stay in the MIS group was shorter than the open group (MD, -0.68; <i>p</i> = 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MIS in emergency settings seems feasible for treating acute incarcerated ventral hernias. However, due to the limitations of the included studies, the obtained evidence should be analyzed with caution. Further prospective studies are required to draw definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"267-279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143795779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-04-18DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2490080
Kemal Güngördük, Berican Şahin Uyar, Varol Gülseren
Background: This study compared two minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques-single-port umbilical laparoscopy (SPLS) and vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES)-in terms of operating time, blood loss, postoperative pain, and hospitalization duration.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent hysterectomy via SPLS or vNOTES. Inclusion criteria were patients who had a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy, with additional procedures such as salpingo-oophorectomy or sentinel lymph node dissection as indicated.
Results: Among the 121 patients studied, 63 underwent SPLS and 58 underwent vNOTES. The mean operative time was 67.3 ± 15.9 min for vNOTES and 75.7 ± 12.1 min for SPLS. Six patients (9.5%) in the SPLS group and four (6.9%) in the vNOTES group underwent sentinel lymph node biopsies for endometrial cancer. Pain assessment at six, 12, and 24 h after surgery indicated lower visual analog scale (VAS) scores in the vNOTES group. Notably, patients in that group reported reduced shoulder and umbilical pain at 24 h postoperatively. Those patients also showed improved sexual function index scores and reduced dyspareunia, although the differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusions: The vNOTES approach to hysterectomy is a viable alternative, characterized by shorter operative times and decreased postoperative pain without increasing complication rates.
{"title":"Comparative outcomes of hysterectomy using single-port umbilical laparoscopy versus vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.","authors":"Kemal Güngördük, Berican Şahin Uyar, Varol Gülseren","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2490080","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2490080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared two minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques-single-port umbilical laparoscopy (SPLS) and vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES)-in terms of operating time, blood loss, postoperative pain, and hospitalization duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent hysterectomy <i>via</i> SPLS or vNOTES. Inclusion criteria were patients who had a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy, with additional procedures such as salpingo-oophorectomy or sentinel lymph node dissection as indicated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 121 patients studied, 63 underwent SPLS and 58 underwent vNOTES. The mean operative time was 67.3 ± 15.9 min for vNOTES and 75.7 ± 12.1 min for SPLS. Six patients (9.5%) in the SPLS group and four (6.9%) in the vNOTES group underwent sentinel lymph node biopsies for endometrial cancer. Pain assessment at six, 12, and 24 h after surgery indicated lower visual analog scale (VAS) scores in the vNOTES group. Notably, patients in that group reported reduced shoulder and umbilical pain at 24 h postoperatively. Those patients also showed improved sexual function index scores and reduced dyspareunia, although the differences were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The vNOTES approach to hysterectomy is a viable alternative, characterized by shorter operative times and decreased postoperative pain without increasing complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"318-323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144033399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-03-22DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2481394
Jan-Willem Klok, Masie Rahimi, Sem Hardon, Roelf Postema, Jaap Bonjer, Freek Daams, Jenny Dankelman, Tim Horeman
Background: Laparoscopic surgery requires a complex set of motor skills. Currently, basic laparoscopic skills training is performed in a static environment, while intraoperatively, abdominal tissue is often moving. The aim of this study was to develop a dynamic training platform and evaluate its impact on laparoscopic skills acquisition in a box trainer.
Methods: The Dynamic Laparoscopic Platform (DyLaP) includes a moving base which has been intergrated with the Lapron box trainer and the ForceSense objective measurement system. Dynamic training was evaluated in a comparative study where novices were divided into a static and dynamic training group, performing six training trials of a peg transfer task with the DyLaP. Afterwards, both groups performed a dynamic exam task. Task manipulation (force) and instrument efficiency (path length and time) were measured.
Results: Participants (n = 12) exhibited a significant difference (p < 0.05) in time, path length, and maximum force between the static and dynamic groups in the first trial. Learning curves were most prevalent in the dynamic group.
Conclusions: The DyLaP can be used to provide a challenging and realistic training environment. From the comparative peg transfer study, it can be concluded that dynamic training significantly affects laparoscopic skill acquisition. More research is needed to evaluate dynamic training effects in force-based training tasks.
{"title":"The impact of simulated intra-abdominal movement on basic laparoscopic skills development: a feasibility study.","authors":"Jan-Willem Klok, Masie Rahimi, Sem Hardon, Roelf Postema, Jaap Bonjer, Freek Daams, Jenny Dankelman, Tim Horeman","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2481394","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2481394","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic surgery requires a complex set of motor skills. Currently, basic laparoscopic skills training is performed in a static environment, while intraoperatively, abdominal tissue is often moving. The aim of this study was to develop a dynamic training platform and evaluate its impact on laparoscopic skills acquisition in a box trainer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Dynamic Laparoscopic Platform (DyLaP) includes a moving base which has been intergrated with the Lapron box trainer and the ForceSense objective measurement system. Dynamic training was evaluated in a comparative study where novices were divided into a static and dynamic training group, performing six training trials of a peg transfer task with the DyLaP. Afterwards, both groups performed a dynamic exam task. Task manipulation (force) and instrument efficiency (path length and time) were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 12) exhibited a significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in time, path length, and maximum force between the static and dynamic groups in the first trial. Learning curves were most prevalent in the dynamic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DyLaP can be used to provide a challenging and realistic training environment. From the comparative peg transfer study, it can be concluded that dynamic training significantly affects laparoscopic skill acquisition. More research is needed to evaluate dynamic training effects in force-based training tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"324-333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143677013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-02-21DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2467805
Diya Shah, Freweini Martha Tesfai, Matthew Boal, Alberto Arezzo, Nader Francis
Background: Robotic-assisted endoluminal systems are rapidly evolving within the field of minimally invasive surgery. The IDEAL framework (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Surveillance) can be used to evaluate novel technologies. This review provides a summary of current and emerging endoluminal systems using the IDEAL framework.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted to include all existing and developing robotic-assisted endoluminal systems. Data was collected via virtual interviews, questionnaires, biomedical databases, company websites, and peer-reviewed articles. Key metrics were reported, enabling the assignment of each system to an IDEAL stage.
Results: The review identified 17 distinct systems from 16 companies. Nine systems received regulatory approval in their respective countries. Our evaluation showed that two systems were at the pre-IDEAL Stage 0. Seven systems were in the Idea stage (Stage 1), six systems were in the Development stage (Stage 2) and two systems completed Stage 3. No system underwent long-term study evaluation (Stage 4).
Conclusions: There is a gap in long-term clinical data of robotic-assisted endoluminal systems, indicated by the absence of systems at Stage 4. Collaborative efforts amongst the medical community, regulatory bodies, and industry specialists are vital to ensure the delivery of evidence-based medicine in the discipline of robotics.
背景:机器人辅助腔内系统在微创外科领域发展迅速。IDEAL框架(Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Surveillance)可用于评估新技术。本文综述了使用IDEAL框架的现有和新出现的腔内系统。方法:进行范围审查,包括所有现有的和正在开发的机器人辅助腔内系统。数据通过虚拟访谈、问卷调查、生物医学数据库、公司网站和同行评议文章收集。报告了关键指标,使每个系统能够分配到理想阶段。结果:审查确定了来自16家公司的17种不同的系统。9个系统在各自国家获得了监管部门的批准。我们的评估显示两个系统处于pre-IDEAL阶段0。七个系统处于构思阶段(第一阶段),六个系统处于发展阶段(第二阶段),两个系统完成了第三阶段。结论:机器人辅助腔内系统的长期临床数据存在空白,这表明在第4期没有系统。医学界、监管机构和行业专家之间的合作努力对于确保机器人学科的循证医学的交付至关重要。
{"title":"Evaluation of current and emerging endoluminal robotic platforms using the IDEAL framework.","authors":"Diya Shah, Freweini Martha Tesfai, Matthew Boal, Alberto Arezzo, Nader Francis","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2467805","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2467805","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted endoluminal systems are rapidly evolving within the field of minimally invasive surgery. The IDEAL framework (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Surveillance) can be used to evaluate novel technologies. This review provides a summary of current and emerging endoluminal systems using the IDEAL framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted to include all existing and developing robotic-assisted endoluminal systems. Data was collected <i>via</i> virtual interviews, questionnaires, biomedical databases, company websites, and peer-reviewed articles. Key metrics were reported, enabling the assignment of each system to an IDEAL stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review identified 17 distinct systems from 16 companies. Nine systems received regulatory approval in their respective countries. Our evaluation showed that two systems were at the pre-IDEAL Stage 0. Seven systems were in the Idea stage (Stage 1), six systems were in the Development stage (Stage 2) and two systems completed Stage 3. No system underwent long-term study evaluation (Stage 4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a gap in long-term clinical data of robotic-assisted endoluminal systems, indicated by the absence of systems at Stage 4. Collaborative efforts amongst the medical community, regulatory bodies, and industry specialists are vital to ensure the delivery of evidence-based medicine in the discipline of robotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"253-266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143476700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-03-05DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2473587
Ilaria Benzoni, Martina Fricano, Jessica Borali, Martina Bonafede, Andrea Celotti, Antonio Tarasconi, Valerio Ranieri, Luigi Totaro, Luca Mattia Quarti, Arianna Dendena, Giulia Grizzi, Maria Bonomi, Roberto Grassia, Barbara Frittoli, Gian Luca Baiocchi
Background: The spread of colorectal cancer screening has increased the percentage of patients with early-stage rectal cancer; at least 30% of patients are diagnosed with a clinical-stage cT1 or pT1 after endoscopic excision. In this subgroup of patients, the real advantage of total mesorectal excision (TME) over local excision (LE) is the ability to remove mesorectal nodes, which are metastatic in less than 20% of cases.
Method: To solve the unmet need for accurate nodal staging in patients with cT0/cT1, cN0 rectal cancer, we designed a pilot study that associates LE with mesorectal fluorescence-guided nodal sampling. From November 2018 to November 2023, we enrolled a total of ten patients with T1N0M0 rectal cancer. After extensive staging and adequate information, patients underwent endoscopic indocyanine green (ICG) infiltration and transanal local excision associated with laparoscopic fluorescence-guided mesorectal nodal sampling.
Results: After a median follow-up of 24 months (range 1-63 months), no case of local or nodal recurrence was observed. All patients were spared from ostomy and lower anterior resection syndrome.
Conclusions: In selected cases of cT0-1cN0 rectal cancer, transanal local excision plus ICG lymph nodal sampling is a feasible surgical option that increases the rate of organ preservation. Further studies are needed to identify the patients most likely to benefit from this minimally invasive strategy.
{"title":"Fluorescence-guided mesorectal nodes harvesting associated with local excision for early rectal cancer: technical notes.","authors":"Ilaria Benzoni, Martina Fricano, Jessica Borali, Martina Bonafede, Andrea Celotti, Antonio Tarasconi, Valerio Ranieri, Luigi Totaro, Luca Mattia Quarti, Arianna Dendena, Giulia Grizzi, Maria Bonomi, Roberto Grassia, Barbara Frittoli, Gian Luca Baiocchi","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2473587","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2473587","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The spread of colorectal cancer screening has increased the percentage of patients with early-stage rectal cancer; at least 30% of patients are diagnosed with a clinical-stage cT1 or pT1 after endoscopic excision. In this subgroup of patients, the real advantage of total mesorectal excision (TME) over local excision (LE) is the ability to remove mesorectal nodes, which are metastatic in less than 20% of cases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>To solve the unmet need for accurate nodal staging in patients with cT0/cT1, cN0 rectal cancer, we designed a pilot study that associates LE with mesorectal fluorescence-guided nodal sampling. From November 2018 to November 2023, we enrolled a total of ten patients with T1N0M0 rectal cancer. After extensive staging and adequate information, patients underwent endoscopic indocyanine green (ICG) infiltration and transanal local excision associated with laparoscopic fluorescence-guided mesorectal nodal sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a median follow-up of 24 months (range 1-63 months), no case of local or nodal recurrence was observed. All patients were spared from ostomy and lower anterior resection syndrome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In selected cases of cT0-1cN0 rectal cancer, transanal local excision plus ICG lymph nodal sampling is a feasible surgical option that increases the rate of organ preservation. Further studies are needed to identify the patients most likely to benefit from this minimally invasive strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"290-296"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143557330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The optimal reconstruction route after esophagectomy remains controversial. The retrosternal route has the advantage of a lower risk of fatal complications. However, the blind maneuver to create a retrosternal route may cause bleeding and pleural injury. Herein, we report a novel robotic technique for creating a retrosternal route.
Methods: This study included 43 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with robotic retrosternal route reconstruction between April 2021 and December 2023. Clinicopathological findings and perioperative outcomes, including the time required to create the retrosternal route, were retrospectively analyzed. The creation times were also compared among surgeons.
Results: The median age and body mass index of the patients were 68 years (range: 46-80) and 21.4 kg/m2 (range: 16.6-30.2 kg/m2), respectively. Twenty-six patients (60%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median time to create the retrosternal route was nine minutes (range, 5-14 min). No cases showed pleural injury or postoperative hemorrhage associated with this procedure. There was no significant difference in the time taken to create the retrosternal route between the four surgeons (p = 0.434).
Conclusions: Robotic creation of a retrosternal route for gastric conduit reconstruction is simple, easy to learn, and results in a safe and feasible procedure.
{"title":"A novel robotic technique for creating the retrosternal route in gastric conduit reconstruction.","authors":"Toshikatsu Tsuji, Noriyuki Inaki, Kenta Doden, Saki Hayashi, Hiroto Saito, Takahisa Yamaguchi, Daisuke Yamamoto, Koichi Okamoto, Hideki Moriyama, Jun Kinoshita","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2475122","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2475122","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal reconstruction route after esophagectomy remains controversial. The retrosternal route has the advantage of a lower risk of fatal complications. However, the blind maneuver to create a retrosternal route may cause bleeding and pleural injury. Herein, we report a novel robotic technique for creating a retrosternal route.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 43 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with robotic retrosternal route reconstruction between April 2021 and December 2023. Clinicopathological findings and perioperative outcomes, including the time required to create the retrosternal route, were retrospectively analyzed. The creation times were also compared among surgeons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age and body mass index of the patients were 68 years (range: 46-80) and 21.4 kg/m2 (range: 16.6-30.2 kg/m2), respectively. Twenty-six patients (60%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median time to create the retrosternal route was nine minutes (range, 5-14 min). No cases showed pleural injury or postoperative hemorrhage associated with this procedure. There was no significant difference in the time taken to create the retrosternal route between the four surgeons (<i>p</i> = 0.434).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic creation of a retrosternal route for gastric conduit reconstruction is simple, easy to learn, and results in a safe and feasible procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"303-309"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143625028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-01-10DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2449266
Xiaodan Zhao, Yadong Feng, Mingyue Li, Ye Zhu, Xiajiao Tang, Ruihua Shi
Background: The aim of this study was to verify the safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection (ER) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).
Methods: Among a consecutive series of resections for gastric GISTs performed in a single center, the outcomes of patients who had ER were compared to standard surgical resection (SR).
Results: In the cohort, 329 consecutive primary localized gastric GISTs patients (n, ER/SR = 251/78) were enrolled. Patients receiving ER were revealed to have preferable post-treatment outcomes, prolonged overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Tumor diameter, the only independent risk factor for a complicated post-operative course, was utilized for propensity score matching (PSM). In the PSM cohort, patients receiving ER and SR with similar tumor size (4.0 [2.7-4.5] cm) shared similar aggressiveness in terms of stomach layers of tumor origination and invasion, and modified National Institutes of Health (mNIH) risk criteria. Shorter operative time, fewer economic costs, and shorter post-operative stay were still observed in the ER group (ER vs. SR: 80 [49-120] vs. 120 [98-160] minutes, p < 0.001; 44 [38-51] vs. 60 [49-84] thousand Renminbi [kRMB], p < 0.001; 7.0 [6.0-8.0] vs. 8.5 [6.0-12] days, p = 0.018, respectively). No significant difference in OS and DFS was demonstrated in the PSM cohort.
Conclusions: ER is safe and effective, thus a feasible treatment option for indicated gastric GISTs patients with the advantage of faster recovery and lower economic costs.
背景:本研究的目的是验证内镜下切除(ER)治疗胃肠道间质瘤(gist)的安全性和有效性。方法:在单一中心进行的连续一系列胃胃肠道间质瘤切除术中,将ER患者的结果与标准手术切除(SR)进行比较。结果:在队列中,329例连续的原发性局部胃gist患者(n, ER/SR = 251/78)被纳入。接受ER治疗的患者具有较好的治疗后预后,延长了总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。肿瘤直径是术后复杂病程的唯一独立危险因素,用于倾向评分匹配(PSM)。在PSM队列中,接受ER和SR治疗的肿瘤大小相似(4.0 [2.7-4.5]cm)的患者在肿瘤起源和侵袭的胃层方面具有相似的侵袭性,并修改了美国国立卫生研究院(mNIH)的风险标准。ER组手术时间更短,经济成本更低,术后住院时间更短(ER与SR: 80 [49-120] vs. 120 [98-160] min, p p p = 0.018)。在PSM队列中,OS和DFS没有显着差异。结论:内窥镜治疗安全有效,具有恢复快、经济成本低的优势,是适应期胃间质瘤患者可行的治疗选择。
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Xiaodan Zhao, Yadong Feng, Mingyue Li, Ye Zhu, Xiajiao Tang, Ruihua Shi","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2449266","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2449266","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to verify the safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection (ER) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among a consecutive series of resections for gastric GISTs performed in a single center, the outcomes of patients who had ER were compared to standard surgical resection (SR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the cohort, 329 consecutive primary localized gastric GISTs patients (<i>n</i>, ER/SR = 251/78) were enrolled. Patients receiving ER were revealed to have preferable post-treatment outcomes, prolonged overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Tumor diameter, the only independent risk factor for a complicated post-operative course, was utilized for propensity score matching (PSM). In the PSM cohort, patients receiving ER and SR with similar tumor size (4.0 [2.7-4.5] cm) shared similar aggressiveness in terms of stomach layers of tumor origination and invasion, and modified National Institutes of Health (mNIH) risk criteria. Shorter operative time, fewer economic costs, and shorter post-operative stay were still observed in the ER group (ER vs. SR: 80 [49-120] vs. 120 [98-160] minutes, <i>p</i> < 0.001; 44 [38-51] vs. 60 [49-84] thousand Renminbi [kRMB], <i>p</i> < 0.001; 7.0 [6.0-8.0] vs. 8.5 [6.0-12] days, <i>p</i> = 0.018, respectively). No significant difference in OS and DFS was demonstrated in the PSM cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ER is safe and effective, thus a feasible treatment option for indicated gastric GISTs patients with the advantage of faster recovery and lower economic costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"166-176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142951256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-01-21DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2454237
Matteo Pescio, Dennis Kundrat, Giulio Dagnino
Endovascular interventions excel in treating cardiovascular diseases in a minimally invasive manner, showing improved outcomes over open techniques. However, challenges related to precise navigation - still relying on 2D fluoroscopy - persist. This review examines the role of robotics, highlighting commercial and research platforms, while exploring emerging trends like MRI compatibility, enhanced navigation, and autonomy. MRI-compatible systems offer radiation-free 3D imaging. Human-robot interaction evolves with task-specific interfaces, while autonomy ranges from partial to full, aiding clinical operators. Challenges include complexity and cost, emphasizing compatibility and navigation advancements. Integrating MRI-compatible robots, refining human-robot interaction, and enhancing autonomy promise advancements in endovascular surgery, fueled by AI and innovative imaging.
{"title":"Endovascular robotics: technical advances and future directions.","authors":"Matteo Pescio, Dennis Kundrat, Giulio Dagnino","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2454237","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2454237","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endovascular interventions excel in treating cardiovascular diseases in a minimally invasive manner, showing improved outcomes over open techniques. However, challenges related to precise navigation - still relying on 2D fluoroscopy - persist. This review examines the role of robotics, highlighting commercial and research platforms, while exploring emerging trends like MRI compatibility, enhanced navigation, and autonomy. MRI-compatible systems offer radiation-free 3D imaging. Human-robot interaction evolves with task-specific interfaces, while autonomy ranges from partial to full, aiding clinical operators. Challenges include complexity and cost, emphasizing compatibility and navigation advancements. Integrating MRI-compatible robots, refining human-robot interaction, and enhancing autonomy promise advancements in endovascular surgery, fueled by AI and innovative imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"239-252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143008277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-02-07DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2449699
Karianne Sagberg, Torgrim Lie, Helene F Peterson, Vigdis Hillestad, Anne Eskild, Lars Eirik Bø
Background: Placental volume measurements can potentially identify high-risk pregnancies. We aimed to develop and validate a new method for placental volume measurements using tracked 2D ultrasound and automatic image segmentation.
Methods: We included 43 pregnancies at gestational week 27 and acquired placental images using a 2D ultrasound probe with position tracking, and trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic image segmentation. The automatically segmented 2D images were combined with tracking data to calculate placental volume. For 15 of the included pregnancies, placental volume was also estimated based on MRI examinations, 3D ultrasound and manually segmented 2D ultrasound images. The ultrasound methods were compared to MRI (gold standard).
Results: The CNN demonstrated good performance in automatic image segmentation (F1-score 0.84). The correlation with MRI-based placental volume was similar for tracked 2D ultrasound using automatically segmented images (absolute agreement intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.58, 95% CI 0.13-0.84) and manually segmented images (ICC 0.59, 95% CI 0.13-0.84). The 3D ultrasound method showed lower ICC (0.35, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.74) than the methods based on tracked 2D ultrasound.
Conclusions: Tracked 2D ultrasound with automatic image segmentation is a promising new method for placental volume measurements and has potential for further improvement.
背景:胎盘体积测量可以潜在地识别高危妊娠。我们的目的是开发和验证一种新的方法,用于胎盘体积测量跟踪二维超声和自动图像分割。方法:选取43例妊娠第27周的孕妇,采用位置跟踪的二维超声探头获取胎盘图像,并训练卷积神经网络(CNN)进行图像自动分割。将自动分割的二维图像与跟踪数据结合计算胎盘体积。对其中15例妊娠,还根据MRI检查、3D超声和手工分割的2D超声图像估计胎盘体积。将超声方法与MRI(金标准)进行比较。结果:CNN在自动图像分割方面表现良好(F1-score 0.84)。使用自动分割图像跟踪二维超声(绝对一致类内相关系数[ICC] 0.58, 95% CI 0.13-0.84)和手动分割图像(ICC 0.59, 95% CI 0.13-0.84)与基于mri的胎盘体积的相关性相似。3D超声方法的ICC (0.35, 95% CI -0.11 ~ 0.74)低于基于二维超声跟踪的方法。结论:自动图像分割的二维超声追踪技术是一种很有前途的胎盘体积测量新方法,并有进一步改进的潜力。
{"title":"A new method for placental volume measurements using tracked 2D ultrasound and automatic image segmentation.","authors":"Karianne Sagberg, Torgrim Lie, Helene F Peterson, Vigdis Hillestad, Anne Eskild, Lars Eirik Bø","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2449699","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2449699","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Placental volume measurements can potentially identify high-risk pregnancies. We aimed to develop and validate a new method for placental volume measurements using tracked 2D ultrasound and automatic image segmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 43 pregnancies at gestational week 27 and acquired placental images using a 2D ultrasound probe with position tracking, and trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic image segmentation. The automatically segmented 2D images were combined with tracking data to calculate placental volume. For 15 of the included pregnancies, placental volume was also estimated based on MRI examinations, 3D ultrasound and manually segmented 2D ultrasound images. The ultrasound methods were compared to MRI (gold standard).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CNN demonstrated good performance in automatic image segmentation (F1-score 0.84). The correlation with MRI-based placental volume was similar for tracked 2D ultrasound using automatically segmented images (absolute agreement intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.58, 95% CI 0.13-0.84) and manually segmented images (ICC 0.59, 95% CI 0.13-0.84). The 3D ultrasound method showed lower ICC (0.35, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.74) than the methods based on tracked 2D ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tracked 2D ultrasound with automatic image segmentation is a promising new method for placental volume measurements and has potential for further improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"230-238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143365057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}