首页 > 最新文献

Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies最新文献

英文 中文
Minimally invasive approach for inguinoscrotal hernia repair. A systematic literature review. 腹股沟阴囊疝微创修补术。系统的文献综述。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-28 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2524831
Andrea Balla, Alberto Sartori, Monica Ortenzi, Livia Bressan, Mauro Podda, Salvador Morales-Conde

Background: This systematic review reports the presently available evidence regarding the results of the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach for the treatment of inguinoscrotal hernias (ISHs).

Methods: After PROSPERO registration (CRD-42023493129), a search was performed in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases.

Results: One-thousand-fifty-two patients were included (78.3% and 21.7% underwent transabdominal preperitoneal repair [TAPP] and totally extraperitoneal repair [TEP], respectively). Twenty-one complications occurred during TAPP (2.5%), and 28 occurred during TEP (12.3%). Conversion to open surgery for TAPP procedure was reported in seven patients (0.8%). TEP procedure required conversion to TAPP in 19 patients (8.3%), and open surgery in 18 patients (7.9%) (overall conversion rate 16.2%). Postoperative complication rate was 30.1% (317 patients), with 193 after TAPP repair (23.4%) and 124 after TEP repair (54.4%) (including Clavien-Dindo I-IV). Length of hospital stay ranged between one to five days after both repairs. The overall recurrence rate was 1.6% (19 recurrences), of which 12 (1.3%) and seven (2.8%) recurrences after TAPP and TEP, respectively.

Conclusions: MIS approaches for ISH repair are technically challenging. TEP repair should be avoided in case of ISH repair, due to the high rate of postoperative complications, risk of conversion and recurrences.

背景:本系统综述报告了目前可用的关于微创手术(MIS)方法治疗腹股沟阴囊疝(ISHs)的结果的证据。方法:在PROSPERO注册(CRD-42023493129)后,在MEDLINE、Embase和Web of Science数据库中进行检索。结果:共纳入1252例患者,其中78.3%行经腹腹膜前修复术(TAPP), 21.7%行全腹膜外修复术(TEP)。TAPP期间发生并发症21例(2.5%),TEP期间发生并发症28例(12.3%)。7例患者(0.8%)报告TAPP手术转为开放手术。19例(8.3%)患者需要转换为TAPP, 18例(7.9%)患者需要开放手术(总转换率为16.2%)。术后并发症发生率为30.1%(317例),其中TAPP修复193例(23.4%),TEP修复124例(54.4%)(包括Clavien-Dindo I-IV)。两次修复后的住院时间在一到五天之间。总复发率为1.6%(19例),其中TAPP和TEP术后复发率分别为12例(1.3%)和7例(2.8%)。结论:MIS入路在ISH修复技术上具有挑战性。由于术后并发症发生率高,有转归和复发的风险,应避免在ISH修复的情况下进行TEP修复。
{"title":"Minimally invasive approach for inguinoscrotal hernia repair. A systematic literature review.","authors":"Andrea Balla, Alberto Sartori, Monica Ortenzi, Livia Bressan, Mauro Podda, Salvador Morales-Conde","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2524831","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2524831","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review reports the presently available evidence regarding the results of the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach for the treatment of inguinoscrotal hernias (ISHs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After PROSPERO registration (CRD-42023493129), a search was performed in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-thousand-fifty-two patients were included (78.3% and 21.7% underwent transabdominal preperitoneal repair [TAPP] and totally extraperitoneal repair [TEP], respectively). Twenty-one complications occurred during TAPP (2.5%), and 28 occurred during TEP (12.3%). Conversion to open surgery for TAPP procedure was reported in seven patients (0.8%). TEP procedure required conversion to TAPP in 19 patients (8.3%), and open surgery in 18 patients (7.9%) (overall conversion rate 16.2%). Postoperative complication rate was 30.1% (317 patients), with 193 after TAPP repair (23.4%) and 124 after TEP repair (54.4%) (including Clavien-Dindo I-IV). Length of hospital stay ranged between one to five days after both repairs. The overall recurrence rate was 1.6% (19 recurrences), of which 12 (1.3%) and seven (2.8%) recurrences after TAPP and TEP, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MIS approaches for ISH repair are technically challenging. TEP repair should be avoided in case of ISH repair, due to the high rate of postoperative complications, risk of conversion and recurrences.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"344-357"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144528671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimized design of a non-isopeak-ring endovascular stent graft for thoracic aortic aneurysm. 胸主动脉瘤非等开环血管内支架的优化设计。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-24 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2523253
Yu Zhou, Chengli Song, Ailing Zhang, Shiju Yan

Background: To optimize the design of the stent graft (SG) with a non-isopeak-ring, this study investigates the radial support and bending flexibility properties of SGs with different spacing, number of peaks, and peak heights.

Methods: Numerical simulation and physical experiments were used to compare the mechanical properties of isopeak-ring SGs and non-isopeak-ring SGs.

Results: Greater spacing of stent rings can provide greater bending flexibility; fewer peaks in the stent ring result in more radial support and less spring-back force. The SG design featuring a gradient of five wave peaks and a minimum stent ring spacing of 5 mm has the best flexibility. The relationship in terms of radial support force magnitude is as follows: isopeak-ring with heights of 13 mm > combination > gradient > isopeak-ring with heights of 16 mm. Additionally, the smaller the peak height, the greater its radial support.

Conclusions: It is found that the gradient SG with five peaks not only provides sufficient radial support but also demonstrates superior flexibility compared to other types of SGs.

背景:为了优化非等峰环支架的设计,本研究研究了不同间距、峰数和峰高的支架的径向支撑和弯曲柔韧性。方法:采用数值模拟和物理实验相结合的方法,比较等丁环和非等丁环的力学性能。结果:支架环间距越大,可提供更大的弯曲灵活性;支架环的峰值越少,径向支撑越大,回弹力越小。SG设计具有5个波峰梯度和最小支架环间距5mm的特点,具有最佳的灵活性。径向支撑力大小的关系为:等高13mm的等高环>组合>梯度>等高16mm的等高环。此外,峰高越小,其径向支撑越大。结论:五峰梯度SG与其他类型SG相比,不仅具有足够的径向支持,而且具有优越的柔韧性。
{"title":"Optimized design of a non-isopeak-ring endovascular stent graft for thoracic aortic aneurysm.","authors":"Yu Zhou, Chengli Song, Ailing Zhang, Shiju Yan","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2523253","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2523253","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To optimize the design of the stent graft (SG) with a non-isopeak-ring, this study investigates the radial support and bending flexibility properties of SGs with different spacing, number of peaks, and peak heights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Numerical simulation and physical experiments were used to compare the mechanical properties of isopeak-ring SGs and non-isopeak-ring SGs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Greater spacing of stent rings can provide greater bending flexibility; fewer peaks in the stent ring result in more radial support and less spring-back force. The SG design featuring a gradient of five wave peaks and a minimum stent ring spacing of 5 mm has the best flexibility. The relationship in terms of radial support force magnitude is as follows: isopeak-ring with heights of 13 mm > combination > gradient > isopeak-ring with heights of 16 mm. Additionally, the smaller the peak height, the greater its radial support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is found that the gradient SG with five peaks not only provides sufficient radial support but also demonstrates superior flexibility compared to other types of SGs.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"386-394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144475916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of embolization endpoints on the efficacy of uterine artery embolization for adenomyosis. 栓塞终点对子宫动脉栓塞治疗bb0疗效的影响。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-17 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2531204
Liang Yin, Xingwei Sun, Meijin Wu, Mingqing Zhang, Jian Jing, Xuming Bai, Yong Jin

Background: This study aimed to assess how embolization endpoints affect the efficacy of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for adenomyosis.

Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, patients treated with UAE from 2014-2018 received the standard embolization endpoint (SEE), while those from 2019-2022 received the delayed embolization endpoint (DEE). Clinical outcomes, including embolic microsphere volume, uterine volume, CA125 levels, hemoglobin, menstrual flow, dysmenorrhea, and postoperative complications, were compared between the groups.

Results: At six months post-procedure, all patients showed significant improvement in clinical indicators (p < 0.01). Group DEE used significantly more embolic microspheres than Group SEE (p < 0.01) and achieved greater reductions in CA125, menstrual volume, and dysmenorrhea (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative uterine volume, hemoglobin, or complication rates between the groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: UAE is a safe and effective treatment for adenomyosis. Compared to the standard approach, the delayed embolization endpoint provides superior symptom relief and warrants broader clinical adoption.

背景:本研究旨在评估栓塞终点如何影响子宫动脉栓塞(UAE)治疗子宫腺肌症的疗效。方法:在这项单中心回顾性队列研究中,2014-2018年接受UAE治疗的患者接受标准栓塞终点(SEE),而2019-2022年接受延迟栓塞终点(DEE)。比较两组患者的临床结果,包括栓塞微球体积、子宫体积、CA125水平、血红蛋白、月经流量、痛经、术后并发症。结果:术后6个月,所有患者的临床指标均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。结论:UAE是一种安全有效的治疗子宫腺肌症的方法。与标准方法相比,延迟栓塞终点提供了更好的症状缓解,值得更广泛的临床应用。
{"title":"The impact of embolization endpoints on the efficacy of uterine artery embolization for adenomyosis.","authors":"Liang Yin, Xingwei Sun, Meijin Wu, Mingqing Zhang, Jian Jing, Xuming Bai, Yong Jin","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2531204","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2531204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to assess how embolization endpoints affect the efficacy of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for adenomyosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective cohort study, patients treated with UAE from 2014-2018 received the standard embolization endpoint (SEE), while those from 2019-2022 received the delayed embolization endpoint (DEE). Clinical outcomes, including embolic microsphere volume, uterine volume, CA125 levels, hemoglobin, menstrual flow, dysmenorrhea, and postoperative complications, were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At six months post-procedure, all patients showed significant improvement in clinical indicators (p < 0.01). Group DEE used significantly more embolic microspheres than Group SEE (p < 0.01) and achieved greater reductions in CA125, menstrual volume, and dysmenorrhea (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative uterine volume, hemoglobin, or complication rates between the groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UAE is a safe and effective treatment for adenomyosis. Compared to the standard approach, the delayed embolization endpoint provides superior symptom relief and warrants broader clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"406-415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144659622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
vNOTES hysterectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: experiences and outcomes in a tertiary center. 子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫切除术:三级中心的经验和结果。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-04 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2500097
Eralp Bulutlar, Gizem Berfin Uluutku Bulutlar, Latife Aslı Cilli, Çetin Kılıççı, Sadık Şahin

Background: This study compares vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in terms of clinical outcomes, complications, and recovery.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 143 patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions (vNOTES: 63; TLH: 80). Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

Results: vNOTES had a significantly shorter operative time (87 ± 22 vs. 103 ± 22 min, p < .001) and lower blood loss (138 ± 99 vs. 302 ± 132 cm3, p < .001). Postoperative pain scores were lower on days 1, 3, and 7 (p < .001). Patients ambulated earlier (5.87 ± 1.11 vs. 6.59 ± 1.28 h, p < .001) and resumed daily activities faster (6.83 ± 1.1 vs. 7.89 ± 1.17 days, p < .001). No significant differences were found in hospital stay (p = .10), intraoperative complications (p = 1.000), or re-intervention/readmission rates (p = 1.000).

Conclusions: vNOTES is a safe, effective alternative to TLH with advantages in efficiency, pain management, and recovery. However, its learning curve may limit widespread use. Further studies are needed to confirm long-term benefits.

背景:本研究比较了阴道自然腔内内镜手术(vNOTES)和腹腔镜全子宫切除术(TLH)的临床结果、并发症和恢复情况。方法:对143例因良性妇科疾病行子宫切除术的患者进行回顾性研究(vNOTES: 63;子宫切除术:80)。对人口统计学、术中及术后结果进行分析。结果:vNOTES手术时间明显缩短(87±22 vs 103±22 min, p3, p3 p p p p = 0.10),术中并发症(p = 1.000),再干预/再入院率(p = 1.000)。结论:vNOTES是TLH的一种安全、有效的替代方法,在效率、疼痛管理和恢复方面具有优势。然而,它的学习曲线可能会限制其广泛使用。需要进一步的研究来证实长期的益处。
{"title":"vNOTES hysterectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: experiences and outcomes in a tertiary center.","authors":"Eralp Bulutlar, Gizem Berfin Uluutku Bulutlar, Latife Aslı Cilli, Çetin Kılıççı, Sadık Şahin","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2500097","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2500097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compares vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in terms of clinical outcomes, complications, and recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 143 patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions (vNOTES: 63; TLH: 80). Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>vNOTES had a significantly shorter operative time (87 ± 22 vs. 103 ± 22 min, <i>p</i> < .001) and lower blood loss (138 ± 99 vs. 302 ± 132 cm<sup>3</sup>, <i>p</i> < .001). Postoperative pain scores were lower on days 1, 3, and 7 (<i>p</i> < .001). Patients ambulated earlier (5.87 ± 1.11 vs. 6.59 ± 1.28 h, <i>p</i> < .001) and resumed daily activities faster (6.83 ± 1.1 vs. 7.89 ± 1.17 days, <i>p</i> < .001). No significant differences were found in hospital stay (<i>p</i> = .10), intraoperative complications (<i>p</i> = 1.000), or re-intervention/readmission rates (<i>p</i> = 1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>vNOTES is a safe, effective alternative to TLH with advantages in efficiency, pain management, and recovery. However, its learning curve may limit widespread use. Further studies are needed to confirm long-term benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"297-302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144017259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of the mid-term surgical outcomes of vNOTES sacrocolpopexy and vNOTES high uterosacral ligament suspension in pelvic organ prolapse. vNOTES骶骶固定术和vNOTES高位子宫骶韧带悬吊术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的中期手术效果评价。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2500095
Pınar Birol Ilter, Esra Keles, Mehmet Mete Kirlangic, Gazi Yildiz, Arzu Bilge Tekin, Doguş Budak, Soner Gok, Levent Dereli, Niyazi Tug, Murat Yassa, Emre Mat

Background: This multicenter retrospective study aimed to assess the surgical outcomes of vNOTES-HUSLS and sacrocolpopexy after vNOTES hysterectomy for apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods: A total of 101 patients were included. Pre and postoperative modified POP-Q scores, postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and complications were among the information gathered. POP-Q-C score of less than -1 cm was considered an apical recurrence. 'Overall success' was defined as the absence of each of the following factors: ≥ Stage 2 POP (in any compartment), retreatment for prolapse.

Results: vNOTES-HUSLS (n = 78) achieved an overall success rate of 92.2%, accompanied by a low intraoperative complication rate of 2.6% (n = 2) at the 23-month median follow-up. vNOTES-sacrocolpopexy (n = 23) achieved an anatomical success rate of 78.3% and exhibited a low intraoperative complication rate of 4.3% (n = 1) at the 21-month median follow-up. The apical prolapse recurrence rate was 2.6% and 8.7% in the HUSLS and sacrocolpopexy groups, respectively (p = 0.185). Total duration of surgery and VAS scores were significantly lower in the vNOTES-HUSLS group than in the vNOTES-sacrocolpopexy group.

Conclusions: In POP surgery, HUSLS and sacrocolpopexy may be performed using the vNOTES technique depending on the patient's preference for natural tissue repair or mesh use.

背景:本多中心回顾性研究旨在评估vNOTES- husls和骶结肠固定术在vNOTES子宫切除术后根尖盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的手术效果。方法:共纳入101例患者。收集术前和术后改良的POP-Q评分、术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分和并发症等信息。POP-Q-C评分小于-1 cm视为根尖复发。“总体成功”定义为不存在以下任何因素:≥2期POP(任何隔室),脱垂的再治疗。结果:在中位随访23个月时,vNOTES-HUSLS (n = 78)的总成功率为92.2%,术中并发症发生率为2.6% (n = 2)。在21个月的中位随访中,vnotes -骶colpopexy (n = 23)的解剖成功率为78.3%,术中并发症发生率为4.3% (n = 1)。骶colpopexy组和HUSLS组的根尖脱垂复发率分别为2.6%和8.7% (p = 0.185)。vNOTES-HUSLS组的总手术时间和VAS评分明显低于vnotes -骶colpopexy组。结论:在POP手术中,根据患者对自然组织修复或使用补片的偏好,可以使用vNOTES技术进行HUSLS和骶colpop固定术。
{"title":"Evaluation of the mid-term surgical outcomes of vNOTES sacrocolpopexy and vNOTES high uterosacral ligament suspension in pelvic organ prolapse.","authors":"Pınar Birol Ilter, Esra Keles, Mehmet Mete Kirlangic, Gazi Yildiz, Arzu Bilge Tekin, Doguş Budak, Soner Gok, Levent Dereli, Niyazi Tug, Murat Yassa, Emre Mat","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2500095","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2500095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study aimed to assess the surgical outcomes of vNOTES-HUSLS and sacrocolpopexy after vNOTES hysterectomy for apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 101 patients were included. Pre and postoperative modified POP-Q scores, postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and complications were among the information gathered. POP-Q-C score of less than -1 cm was considered an apical recurrence. 'Overall success' was defined as the absence of each of the following factors: ≥ Stage 2 POP (in any compartment), retreatment for prolapse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>vNOTES-HUSLS (<i>n</i> = 78) achieved an overall success rate of 92.2%, accompanied by a low intraoperative complication rate of 2.6% (<i>n</i> = 2) at the 23-month median follow-up. vNOTES-sacrocolpopexy (<i>n</i> = 23) achieved an anatomical success rate of 78.3% and exhibited a low intraoperative complication rate of 4.3% (<i>n</i> = 1) at the 21-month median follow-up. The apical prolapse recurrence rate was 2.6% and 8.7% in the HUSLS and sacrocolpopexy groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.185). Total duration of surgery and VAS scores were significantly lower in the vNOTES-HUSLS group than in the vNOTES-sacrocolpopexy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In POP surgery, HUSLS and sacrocolpopexy may be performed using the vNOTES technique depending on the patient's preference for natural tissue repair or mesh use.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"310-317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144009936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical efficacy of end-to-end anastomosis followed by mucosal folding and burying in minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery. 端到端吻合后粘膜折叠掩埋在微创食管癌手术中的临床疗效。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2472724
Xianchao Chen, Yun Huang

Background: Esophageal cancer is a common malignancy in China, with anastomotic fistula being a major postoperative complication. This study compares the clinical outcomes of end-to-end anastomosis and end-to-end anastomosis with mucosal folding and burying in minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery.

Methods: From October 2020 to March 2023, patients with esophageal cancer who underwent laparoscopic three-incision cervical anastomosis at the Fourth People's Hospital of Zigong City, were radomly assigned to receive either end-to-end anastomosis or end-to-end anastomosis followed by mucosal folding and burying. Clinical indicators, including hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic fistula, and anastomotic stenosis, were compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 107 patients werencluded, with 56 in the end-to-end anastomosis with mucosal folding and burying technique group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic fistula rate, and anastomotic stenosis. However, for patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, the incidence of anastomotic fistula was significantly lower in the group with end-to-end anastomosis with mucosal folding and burying.

Conclusions: End-to-end anastomosis followed by mucosal folding and burying helps reduce the occurrence of anastomotic fistula, especially in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

背景:食管癌是中国常见的恶性肿瘤,吻合口瘘是食管癌术后的主要并发症。本研究比较了端到端吻合与端到端吻合加粘膜折叠掩埋在微创食管癌手术中的临床效果。方法:选取自2020年10月至2023年3月在自贡第四人民医院行腹腔镜宫颈三切口吻合术的食管癌患者,随机分为端到端吻合组和端到端吻合后粘膜折叠掩埋组。比较两组住院时间、手术时间、术中出血量、吻合口瘘、吻合口狭窄等临床指标。结果:共纳入107例患者,其中56例为端到端吻合粘膜折叠埋埋技术组。两组在手术时间、术中出血量、吻合口瘘发生率、吻合口狭窄等方面差异均无统计学意义。而术前行放化疗或化疗联合免疫治疗的患者,端到端吻合粘膜折叠掩埋组吻合口瘘发生率明显较低。结论:端到端吻合后粘膜折叠掩埋有助于减少吻合口瘘的发生,特别是在接受新辅助放化疗的患者中。
{"title":"Clinical efficacy of end-to-end anastomosis followed by mucosal folding and burying in minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery.","authors":"Xianchao Chen, Yun Huang","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2472724","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2472724","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophageal cancer is a common malignancy in China, with anastomotic fistula being a major postoperative complication. This study compares the clinical outcomes of end-to-end anastomosis and end-to-end anastomosis with mucosal folding and burying in minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2020 to March 2023, patients with esophageal cancer who underwent laparoscopic three-incision cervical anastomosis at the Fourth People's Hospital of Zigong City, were radomly assigned to receive either end-to-end anastomosis or end-to-end anastomosis followed by mucosal folding and burying. Clinical indicators, including hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic fistula, and anastomotic stenosis, were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 patients werencluded, with 56 in the end-to-end anastomosis with mucosal folding and burying technique group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic fistula rate, and anastomotic stenosis. However, for patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, the incidence of anastomotic fistula was significantly lower in the group with end-to-end anastomosis with mucosal folding and burying.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>End-to-end anastomosis followed by mucosal folding and burying helps reduce the occurrence of anastomotic fistula, especially in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"280-289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143586289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Minimally invasive approach in emergency for the treatment of acute incarcerated/strangulated ventral hernias. A systematic review and meta-analysis. 治疗急性嵌顿/绞窄性腹股沟疝的急诊微创方法。系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-06 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2487789
Andrea Balla, Alberto Sartori, Mauro Podda, Manuel Cuevas Cabrera, Livia Bressan, Simone Rattizzato, Monica Ortenzi, Eugenio Licardie, Salvador Morales-Conde

Background: This study aims to report the currently available evidence on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in emergency settings for treating acute incarcerated/strangulated ventral, primary, or incisional hernias and compare it with the open approach.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.

Results: Six articles were included. Results of the meta-analysis based on 1720 patients and two articles show that the mean operative time was shorter in the open repair group compared to the MIS group (mean difference [MD], 39.53 min; p < 0.0002). Overall, 116 (13.6%) and 181 (20.9%) postoperative complications were observed after MIS and open repair, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.65; p = 0.61). MIS was associated with a statistically significantly lower wound complication rate than the open approach (RR, 0.43; p = 0.50). The two approaches showed equivalent results regarding return to the operative room (RR, 0.61; p = 0.13). The mean hospital stay in the MIS group was shorter than the open group (MD, -0.68; p = 0.99).

Conclusions: MIS in emergency settings seems feasible for treating acute incarcerated ventral hernias. However, due to the limitations of the included studies, the obtained evidence should be analyzed with caution. Further prospective studies are required to draw definitive conclusions.

背景:本研究旨在报道微创手术(MIS)在紧急情况下治疗急性嵌顿/绞窄腹疝、原发性疝或切口疝的现有证据,并将其与开放入路进行比较。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明进行系统评价。结果:纳入6篇文章。基于1720例患者和两篇文章的荟萃分析结果显示,开放修复组的平均手术时间比MIS组短(平均差异[MD], 39.53 min;p = 0.61)。与开放入路相比,MIS的伤口并发症发生率显著降低(RR, 0.43;p = 0.50)。两种方法在返回手术室方面显示出相同的结果(RR, 0.61;p = 0.13)。MIS组平均住院时间短于开放组(MD, -0.68;p = 0.99)。结论:在紧急情况下,MIS治疗急性嵌顿腹疝是可行的。然而,由于纳入研究的局限性,获得的证据应谨慎分析。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来得出明确的结论。
{"title":"Minimally invasive approach in emergency for the treatment of acute incarcerated/strangulated ventral hernias. A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Andrea Balla, Alberto Sartori, Mauro Podda, Manuel Cuevas Cabrera, Livia Bressan, Simone Rattizzato, Monica Ortenzi, Eugenio Licardie, Salvador Morales-Conde","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2487789","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2487789","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to report the currently available evidence on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in emergency settings for treating acute incarcerated/strangulated ventral, primary, or incisional hernias and compare it with the open approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six articles were included. Results of the meta-analysis based on 1720 patients and two articles show that the mean operative time was shorter in the open repair group compared to the MIS group (mean difference [MD], 39.53 min; <i>p</i> < 0.0002). Overall, 116 (13.6%) and 181 (20.9%) postoperative complications were observed after MIS and open repair, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.65; <i>p</i> = 0.61). MIS was associated with a statistically significantly lower wound complication rate than the open approach (RR, 0.43; <i>p</i> = 0.50). The two approaches showed equivalent results regarding return to the operative room (RR, 0.61; <i>p</i> = 0.13). The mean hospital stay in the MIS group was shorter than the open group (MD, -0.68; <i>p</i> = 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MIS in emergency settings seems feasible for treating acute incarcerated ventral hernias. However, due to the limitations of the included studies, the obtained evidence should be analyzed with caution. Further prospective studies are required to draw definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"267-279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143795779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative outcomes of hysterectomy using single-port umbilical laparoscopy versus vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. 单孔脐带腹腔镜子宫切除术与阴道自然孔腔内窥镜手术的比较结果。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2490080
Kemal Güngördük, Berican Şahin Uyar, Varol Gülseren

Background: This study compared two minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques-single-port umbilical laparoscopy (SPLS) and vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES)-in terms of operating time, blood loss, postoperative pain, and hospitalization duration.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent hysterectomy via SPLS or vNOTES. Inclusion criteria were patients who had a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy, with additional procedures such as salpingo-oophorectomy or sentinel lymph node dissection as indicated.

Results: Among the 121 patients studied, 63 underwent SPLS and 58 underwent vNOTES. The mean operative time was 67.3 ± 15.9 min for vNOTES and 75.7 ± 12.1 min for SPLS. Six patients (9.5%) in the SPLS group and four (6.9%) in the vNOTES group underwent sentinel lymph node biopsies for endometrial cancer. Pain assessment at six, 12, and 24 h after surgery indicated lower visual analog scale (VAS) scores in the vNOTES group. Notably, patients in that group reported reduced shoulder and umbilical pain at 24 h postoperatively. Those patients also showed improved sexual function index scores and reduced dyspareunia, although the differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: The vNOTES approach to hysterectomy is a viable alternative, characterized by shorter operative times and decreased postoperative pain without increasing complication rates.

背景:本研究比较了两种微创子宫切除术技术——单孔脐带腹腔镜(SPLS)和阴道自然孔腔内内镜手术(vNOTES)在手术时间、出血量、术后疼痛和住院时间方面的差异。方法:回顾性分析经SPLS或vNOTES行子宫切除术的患者。纳入标准为子宫切除术合并双侧输卵管切除术的患者,附加手术如输卵管-卵巢切除术或前哨淋巴结清扫。结果:121例患者中,63例行SPLS, 58例行vNOTES。vNOTES平均手术时间为67.3±15.9 min, SPLS平均手术时间为75.7±12.1 min。SPLS组6例(9.5%)患者和vNOTES组4例(6.9%)患者接受了子宫内膜癌前哨淋巴结活检。术后6、12和24小时的疼痛评估显示,vNOTES组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)较低。值得注意的是,该组患者在术后24小时报告肩部和脐部疼痛减轻。这些患者也表现出性功能指数得分的改善和性交困难的减少,尽管差异没有统计学意义。结论:vNOTES入路子宫切除术是一种可行的选择,其特点是手术时间短,术后疼痛减轻,且不增加并发症发生率。
{"title":"Comparative outcomes of hysterectomy using single-port umbilical laparoscopy versus vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.","authors":"Kemal Güngördük, Berican Şahin Uyar, Varol Gülseren","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2490080","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2490080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared two minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques-single-port umbilical laparoscopy (SPLS) and vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES)-in terms of operating time, blood loss, postoperative pain, and hospitalization duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent hysterectomy <i>via</i> SPLS or vNOTES. Inclusion criteria were patients who had a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy, with additional procedures such as salpingo-oophorectomy or sentinel lymph node dissection as indicated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 121 patients studied, 63 underwent SPLS and 58 underwent vNOTES. The mean operative time was 67.3 ± 15.9 min for vNOTES and 75.7 ± 12.1 min for SPLS. Six patients (9.5%) in the SPLS group and four (6.9%) in the vNOTES group underwent sentinel lymph node biopsies for endometrial cancer. Pain assessment at six, 12, and 24 h after surgery indicated lower visual analog scale (VAS) scores in the vNOTES group. Notably, patients in that group reported reduced shoulder and umbilical pain at 24 h postoperatively. Those patients also showed improved sexual function index scores and reduced dyspareunia, although the differences were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The vNOTES approach to hysterectomy is a viable alternative, characterized by shorter operative times and decreased postoperative pain without increasing complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"318-323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144033399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of simulated intra-abdominal movement on basic laparoscopic skills development: a feasibility study. 模拟腹内运动对基本腹腔镜技能发展的影响:可行性研究。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-22 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2481394
Jan-Willem Klok, Masie Rahimi, Sem Hardon, Roelf Postema, Jaap Bonjer, Freek Daams, Jenny Dankelman, Tim Horeman

Background: Laparoscopic surgery requires a complex set of motor skills. Currently, basic laparoscopic skills training is performed in a static environment, while intraoperatively, abdominal tissue is often moving. The aim of this study was to develop a dynamic training platform and evaluate its impact on laparoscopic skills acquisition in a box trainer.

Methods: The Dynamic Laparoscopic Platform (DyLaP) includes a moving base which has been intergrated with the Lapron box trainer and the ForceSense objective measurement system. Dynamic training was evaluated in a comparative study where novices were divided into a static and dynamic training group, performing six training trials of a peg transfer task with the DyLaP. Afterwards, both groups performed a dynamic exam task. Task manipulation (force) and instrument efficiency (path length and time) were measured.

Results: Participants (n = 12) exhibited a significant difference (p < 0.05) in time, path length, and maximum force between the static and dynamic groups in the first trial. Learning curves were most prevalent in the dynamic group.

Conclusions: The DyLaP can be used to provide a challenging and realistic training environment. From the comparative peg transfer study, it can be concluded that dynamic training significantly affects laparoscopic skill acquisition. More research is needed to evaluate dynamic training effects in force-based training tasks.

背景:腹腔镜手术需要一套复杂的运动技能:腹腔镜手术需要一套复杂的运动技能。目前,腹腔镜基本技能训练是在静态环境中进行的,而术中腹部组织往往是运动的。本研究的目的是开发一个动态训练平台,并评估其在箱式训练器中对腹腔镜技能掌握的影响:动态腹腔镜平台(DyLaP)包括一个移动底座,该底座与 Lapron 箱式训练器和 ForceSense 客观测量系统集成。在一项比较研究中对动态训练进行了评估,研究人员将新手分为静态训练组和动态训练组,使用 DyLaP 进行了六次木钉转移任务的训练试验。之后,两组都进行了动态考试任务。对任务操作(力)和仪器效率(路径长度和时间)进行了测量:结果:参与者(n = 12)表现出显著差异(p 结论:DyLaP 可用于进行动态检查:DyLaP 可用于提供具有挑战性的真实训练环境。从挂钩转移比较研究中可以得出结论,动态训练对腹腔镜技能的掌握有显著影响。还需要更多的研究来评估基于力的训练任务中的动态训练效果。
{"title":"The impact of simulated intra-abdominal movement on basic laparoscopic skills development: a feasibility study.","authors":"Jan-Willem Klok, Masie Rahimi, Sem Hardon, Roelf Postema, Jaap Bonjer, Freek Daams, Jenny Dankelman, Tim Horeman","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2481394","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2481394","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic surgery requires a complex set of motor skills. Currently, basic laparoscopic skills training is performed in a static environment, while intraoperatively, abdominal tissue is often moving. The aim of this study was to develop a dynamic training platform and evaluate its impact on laparoscopic skills acquisition in a box trainer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Dynamic Laparoscopic Platform (DyLaP) includes a moving base which has been intergrated with the Lapron box trainer and the ForceSense objective measurement system. Dynamic training was evaluated in a comparative study where novices were divided into a static and dynamic training group, performing six training trials of a peg transfer task with the DyLaP. Afterwards, both groups performed a dynamic exam task. Task manipulation (force) and instrument efficiency (path length and time) were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 12) exhibited a significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in time, path length, and maximum force between the static and dynamic groups in the first trial. Learning curves were most prevalent in the dynamic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DyLaP can be used to provide a challenging and realistic training environment. From the comparative peg transfer study, it can be concluded that dynamic training significantly affects laparoscopic skill acquisition. More research is needed to evaluate dynamic training effects in force-based training tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"324-333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143677013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of current and emerging endoluminal robotic platforms using the IDEAL framework. 使用IDEAL框架评估当前和新兴的腔内机器人平台。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2467805
Diya Shah, Freweini Martha Tesfai, Matthew Boal, Alberto Arezzo, Nader Francis

Background: Robotic-assisted endoluminal systems are rapidly evolving within the field of minimally invasive surgery. The IDEAL framework (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Surveillance) can be used to evaluate novel technologies. This review provides a summary of current and emerging endoluminal systems using the IDEAL framework.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted to include all existing and developing robotic-assisted endoluminal systems. Data was collected via virtual interviews, questionnaires, biomedical databases, company websites, and peer-reviewed articles. Key metrics were reported, enabling the assignment of each system to an IDEAL stage.

Results: The review identified 17 distinct systems from 16 companies. Nine systems received regulatory approval in their respective countries. Our evaluation showed that two systems were at the pre-IDEAL Stage 0. Seven systems were in the Idea stage (Stage 1), six systems were in the Development stage (Stage 2) and two systems completed Stage 3. No system underwent long-term study evaluation (Stage 4).

Conclusions: There is a gap in long-term clinical data of robotic-assisted endoluminal systems, indicated by the absence of systems at Stage 4. Collaborative efforts amongst the medical community, regulatory bodies, and industry specialists are vital to ensure the delivery of evidence-based medicine in the discipline of robotics.

背景:机器人辅助腔内系统在微创外科领域发展迅速。IDEAL框架(Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Surveillance)可用于评估新技术。本文综述了使用IDEAL框架的现有和新出现的腔内系统。方法:进行范围审查,包括所有现有的和正在开发的机器人辅助腔内系统。数据通过虚拟访谈、问卷调查、生物医学数据库、公司网站和同行评议文章收集。报告了关键指标,使每个系统能够分配到理想阶段。结果:审查确定了来自16家公司的17种不同的系统。9个系统在各自国家获得了监管部门的批准。我们的评估显示两个系统处于pre-IDEAL阶段0。七个系统处于构思阶段(第一阶段),六个系统处于发展阶段(第二阶段),两个系统完成了第三阶段。结论:机器人辅助腔内系统的长期临床数据存在空白,这表明在第4期没有系统。医学界、监管机构和行业专家之间的合作努力对于确保机器人学科的循证医学的交付至关重要。
{"title":"Evaluation of current and emerging endoluminal robotic platforms using the IDEAL framework.","authors":"Diya Shah, Freweini Martha Tesfai, Matthew Boal, Alberto Arezzo, Nader Francis","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2467805","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2467805","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted endoluminal systems are rapidly evolving within the field of minimally invasive surgery. The IDEAL framework (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Surveillance) can be used to evaluate novel technologies. This review provides a summary of current and emerging endoluminal systems using the IDEAL framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted to include all existing and developing robotic-assisted endoluminal systems. Data was collected <i>via</i> virtual interviews, questionnaires, biomedical databases, company websites, and peer-reviewed articles. Key metrics were reported, enabling the assignment of each system to an IDEAL stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review identified 17 distinct systems from 16 companies. Nine systems received regulatory approval in their respective countries. Our evaluation showed that two systems were at the pre-IDEAL Stage 0. Seven systems were in the Idea stage (Stage 1), six systems were in the Development stage (Stage 2) and two systems completed Stage 3. No system underwent long-term study evaluation (Stage 4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a gap in long-term clinical data of robotic-assisted endoluminal systems, indicated by the absence of systems at Stage 4. Collaborative efforts amongst the medical community, regulatory bodies, and industry specialists are vital to ensure the delivery of evidence-based medicine in the discipline of robotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"253-266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143476700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies
全部 Geobiology Appl. Clay Sci. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta J. Hydrol. Org. Geochem. Carbon Balance Manage. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. Int. J. Biometeorol. IZV-PHYS SOLID EART+ J. Atmos. Chem. Acta Oceanolog. Sin. Acta Geophys. ACTA GEOL POL ACTA PETROL SIN ACTA GEOL SIN-ENGL AAPG Bull. Acta Geochimica Adv. Atmos. Sci. Adv. Meteorol. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Am. J. Sci. Am. Mineral. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. Appl. Geochem. Aquat. Geochem. Ann. Glaciol. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. ARCHAEOMETRY ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. ATMOSPHERE-BASEL Atmos. Res. Aust. J. Earth Sci. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Atmos. Meas. Tech. Basin Res. Big Earth Data BIOGEOSCIENCES Geostand. Geoanal. Res. GEOLOGY Geosci. J. Geochem. J. Geochem. Trans. Geosci. Front. Geol. Ore Deposits Global Biogeochem. Cycles Gondwana Res. Geochem. Int. Geol. J. Geophys. Prospect. Geosci. Model Dev. GEOL BELG GROUNDWATER Hydrogeol. J. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Hydrol. Processes Int. J. Climatol. Int. J. Earth Sci. Int. Geol. Rev. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. Int. J. Geomech. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. Isl. Arc J. Afr. Earth. Sci. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. J APPL METEOROL CLIM J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. J. Clim. J. Earth Sci. J. Earth Syst. Sci. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. J. Geog. Sci. Mineral. Mag. Miner. Deposita Mon. Weather Rev. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Nat. Clim. Change Nat. Geosci. Ocean Dyn. Ocean and Coastal Research npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. Ocean Modell. Ocean Sci. Ore Geol. Rev. OCEAN SCI J Paleontol. J. PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL PERIOD MINERAL PETROLOGY+ Phys. Chem. Miner. Polar Sci. Prog. Oceanogr. Quat. Sci. Rev. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. RADIOCARBON Pure Appl. Geophys. Resour. Geol. Rev. Geophys. Sediment. Geol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1