首页 > 最新文献

Hellenic Urology最新文献

英文 中文
Positive surgical margins and bladder neck sparing during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy 腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘和膀胱颈部保留
Pub Date : 2019-08-09 DOI: 10.19264/HJ.V31I2.265
K. Zougkas, G. Kotakidis, A. Petas, K. Marantidis, Katerina Aleksandridi
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study is to evaluate the result of bladder neck sparing technique associated with positive surgical margins in patients operated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We analyze data from 17 patients with localized PCa patients treated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy while preserve the bladder neck. In all patients, an intra-operative biopsy was performed from the bladder neck while topographic histological findings, potential positive margins and urinary continence after 3.6 and 12 months were presented. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 65.17 (range 56 to 70). The mean PSA was 6.14 ng/ml (range 3.2 to 10.1), and the most common Gleason Score was 6 (range 6 to 8). In all cases the biopsy from the bladder neck was negative. Sixteen men (94.1%) had clinical stage pT2 and 1 (5.9%) were pT3a. Positive surgical margins were found at the top of the prostate in only 1 case whereas 11, 13 and 15 patients were normalized at 3.6.12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It seems in our patients, that the bladder neck sparing technique is not associated with the increase incidence of positive surgical margins and can also be performed
简介:本研究的目的是评估腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术患者膀胱颈部保留技术与阳性手术切缘相关的结果。材料和方法:我们分析了17例局部前列腺癌患者的资料,这些患者在腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中保留了膀胱颈部。所有患者术中均对膀胱颈部进行活检,并在3.6个月和12个月后呈现地形组织学结果、潜在阳性边缘和尿失禁。结果:患者平均年龄为65.17岁(56 ~ 70岁)。平均PSA为6.14 ng/ml(范围3.2至10.1),最常见的Gleason评分为6(范围6至8)。所有病例的膀胱颈部活检均为阴性。pT2期16例(94.1%),pT3a期1例(5.9%)。仅1例在前列腺顶部发现手术切缘阳性,而在3.6.12个月时分别有11例、13例和15例正常。结论:在我们的患者中,膀胱颈保留技术似乎与阳性手术切缘发生率的增加无关,也可以进行
{"title":"Positive surgical margins and bladder neck sparing during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy","authors":"K. Zougkas, G. Kotakidis, A. Petas, K. Marantidis, Katerina Aleksandridi","doi":"10.19264/HJ.V31I2.265","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19264/HJ.V31I2.265","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study is to evaluate the result of bladder neck sparing technique associated with positive surgical margins in patients operated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We analyze data from 17 patients with localized PCa patients treated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy while preserve the bladder neck. In all patients, an intra-operative biopsy was performed from the bladder neck while topographic histological findings, potential positive margins and urinary continence after 3.6 and 12 months were presented. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 65.17 (range 56 to 70). The mean PSA was 6.14 ng/ml (range 3.2 to 10.1), and the most common Gleason Score was 6 (range 6 to 8). In all cases the biopsy from the bladder neck was negative. Sixteen men (94.1%) had clinical stage pT2 and 1 (5.9%) were pT3a. Positive surgical margins were found at the top of the prostate in only 1 case whereas 11, 13 and 15 patients were normalized at 3.6.12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It seems in our patients, that the bladder neck sparing technique is not associated with the increase incidence of positive surgical margins and can also be performed","PeriodicalId":185530,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Urology","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123225040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Usage and Dosage of Fosfomycin for NIH Category II Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis 磷霉素治疗美国国立卫生研究院二类慢性细菌性前列腺炎的用法和用量
Pub Date : 2019-08-09 DOI: 10.19264/HJ.V31I2.268
K. Stamatiou, G. Perletti, V. Magri, A. Trinchieri
Chronic bacterial prostatitis (CBP, NIH category II) is a difficult- to-eradicate, recurring, chronic infection of the prostate, often characterized by disabling symptoms, significantly reducing the quality of life of patients. Fluoroquinolones have been for many years first-line agents for treatment of this condition. However, mounting pathogen resistance trends (especially in Mediterranean countries like Greece and Italy) are progressively restricting the usage of fluoroquinolones for treating many Gram-positive or Gram-negative infections in the urological field, and clinicians are increasingly treating bacterial prostatitis by empirically administering agents which have not been adequately tested in the frame of clinical trials. In recent years, reports on the efficacy of the bactericidal antibiotic fosfomycin on CBP have been published. Most articles published so far are case reports, and only few case series or cohort studies are available. The aim of this article is to review the information published so far concerning the usage and dosage of fosfomycin for treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis.
慢性细菌性前列腺炎(Chronic bacterial prostatitis, CBP, NIH category II)是一种难以根治、反复发作的前列腺慢性感染,通常以致残症状为特征,显著降低患者的生活质量。氟喹诺酮类药物多年来一直是治疗这种疾病的一线药物。然而,越来越多的病原体耐药趋势(特别是在希腊和意大利等地中海国家)逐渐限制了氟喹诺酮类药物在泌尿科治疗许多革兰氏阳性或革兰氏阴性感染的使用,临床医生越来越多地通过经验性用药来治疗细菌性前列腺炎,这些药物在临床试验框架中没有得到充分的测试。近年来,关于抗菌抗生素磷霉素治疗CBP疗效的报道已陆续发表。迄今为止发表的大多数文章都是病例报告,只有少数病例系列或队列研究可用。本文的目的是回顾迄今为止发表的关于磷霉素治疗慢性细菌性前列腺炎的用法和剂量的信息。
{"title":"Usage and Dosage of Fosfomycin for NIH Category II Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis","authors":"K. Stamatiou, G. Perletti, V. Magri, A. Trinchieri","doi":"10.19264/HJ.V31I2.268","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19264/HJ.V31I2.268","url":null,"abstract":"Chronic bacterial prostatitis (CBP, NIH category II) is a difficult- to-eradicate, recurring, chronic infection of the prostate, often characterized by disabling symptoms, significantly reducing the quality of life of patients. Fluoroquinolones have been for many years first-line agents for treatment of this condition. However, mounting pathogen resistance trends (especially in Mediterranean countries like Greece and Italy) are progressively restricting the usage of fluoroquinolones for treating many Gram-positive or Gram-negative infections in the urological field, and clinicians are increasingly treating bacterial prostatitis by empirically administering agents which have not been adequately tested in the frame of clinical trials. In recent years, reports on the efficacy of the bactericidal antibiotic fosfomycin on CBP have been published. Most articles published so far are case reports, and only few case series or cohort studies are available. The aim of this article is to review the information published so far concerning the usage and dosage of fosfomycin for treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis.","PeriodicalId":185530,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Urology","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126632974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Scopes, lasers and disposables (part 2) 逆行肾内手术:瞄准镜、激光和一次性器械(第2部分)
Pub Date : 2019-08-09 DOI: 10.19264/HJ.V31I2.267
P. Mourmouris, L. Lazarou, L. Tzelves, A. Skolarikos
Flexible instrumentation is the mainstay of minimal invasive stone surgery and this led to the invention of smaller and safer instruments which performed remarkable good to a variety of procedures. Further developments like digital technology and single use ureteroscopes which along with similar technological advances in lasers and disposables transformed flexible surgery in a tool of paramount importance in the intrarenal surgery of various clinical entities. This is the second part of our review of the literature concerning the advances
灵活的器械是微创结石手术的支柱,这导致了更小、更安全的器械的发明,在各种手术中都表现得非常好。数字技术和一次性输尿管镜的进一步发展,以及激光和一次性输尿管镜的类似技术进步,使灵活手术成为各种临床实体的肾内手术中最重要的工具。这是我们对有关进展的文献综述的第二部分
{"title":"Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Scopes, lasers and disposables (part 2)","authors":"P. Mourmouris, L. Lazarou, L. Tzelves, A. Skolarikos","doi":"10.19264/HJ.V31I2.267","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19264/HJ.V31I2.267","url":null,"abstract":"Flexible instrumentation is the mainstay of minimal invasive stone surgery and this led to the invention of smaller and safer instruments which performed remarkable good to a variety of procedures. Further developments like digital technology and single use ureteroscopes which along with similar technological advances in lasers and disposables transformed flexible surgery in a tool of paramount importance in the intrarenal surgery of various clinical entities. This is the second part of our review of the literature concerning the advances","PeriodicalId":185530,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Urology","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131043520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contemporary retrograde intrarenal surgery: Scopes and Lasers 当代逆行肾内手术:范围和激光
Pub Date : 2019-05-27 DOI: 10.19264/HJ.V31I1.258
P. Mourmouris
Flexible instrumentation is the mainstay of minimal invasive stone surgery and this led to the invention of smaller and safer instruments which performed remarkable good to a variety of procedures. Further developments like digital technology and single use ureteroscopes which along with similar technological advances in lasers transformed flexible surgery in a tool of paramount importance in the intrarenal surgery of various clinical entities. We review the literature concerning the advances in the field of scopes and lasers for retrograde intrarenal surgery in an effort to find the optimal combination, if any, that potentially produces the best surgical outcomes.
灵活的器械是微创结石手术的支柱,这导致了更小、更安全的器械的发明,在各种手术中都表现得非常好。数字技术和一次性输尿管镜的进一步发展,以及激光的类似技术进步,使柔性手术成为各种临床实体的肾内手术中最重要的工具。我们回顾了有关逆行肾内手术的范围和激光领域的进展的文献,努力找到最佳的组合,如果有的话,可能会产生最好的手术结果。
{"title":"Contemporary retrograde intrarenal surgery: Scopes and Lasers","authors":"P. Mourmouris","doi":"10.19264/HJ.V31I1.258","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19264/HJ.V31I1.258","url":null,"abstract":"Flexible instrumentation is the mainstay of minimal invasive stone surgery and this led to the invention of smaller and safer instruments which performed remarkable good to a variety of procedures. Further developments like digital technology and single use ureteroscopes which along with similar technological advances in lasers transformed flexible surgery in a tool of paramount importance in the intrarenal surgery of various clinical entities. We review the literature concerning the advances in the field of scopes and lasers for retrograde intrarenal surgery in an effort to find the optimal combination, if any, that potentially produces the best surgical outcomes.","PeriodicalId":185530,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Urology","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128577708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gram-positive microorganisms isolated during Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis investigation. A retrospective study 慢性细菌性前列腺炎调查中分离的革兰氏阳性微生物。回顾性研究
Pub Date : 2019-03-14 DOI: 10.19264/HJ.V30I4.249
K. Stamatiou, V. Magri, G. Perletti, Nektaria Rekleiti, R. Lacroix, H. Moschouris
Introduction/Aim: Chronic bacterial prostatitis (CBP) is an inflammatory condition of the prostate that is characterized by pain in the genital or the pelvic area which may accompany urinary disorders and may cause sexual dysfunction. It caused by a variety of uropathogens such as Gram-negative and Gram-positive microorganisms. The pathogenicity of most Gram-positive microorganisms has been questioned, since most leading experts restrict the list of CBP pathogens to the sole Enterobacteriaceae plus Enterococcus spp. In order to clarify the role of Gram-positive microorganisms on CBP and investigate the treatment options we reviewed our database of CBP cases from 2008 onwards. Material: The material of this retrospective study consisted in Gram-positive bacterial isolates from urine and/or prostatic secretions or sperm cultures (total ejaculate) obtained from individuals with reported chronic pelvic discomfort and genital pain, with or without lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual dysfunction, and from patients with febrile relapses of CBP, visiting the Urology Department of the Tzaneio Prefecture General Hospital of Piraeus, Greece, from 03/2008 to 11/2018. Demographic, microbiological and clinical history of each assessed patient were reviewed. Results/Conclusions: In total, 188 out of 314 Gram-positive bacterial isolates were monomicrobial and the remaining 126 polymicrobial. A vast variety of Gram-positive bacteria was found in positive cultures, with coagulase negative Staphylococci (CoNS, mainly S. haemoliticus, S. hominis, S. epidermidis and rarely S. lugdunensis) being the most frequent pathogens (85 monomicrobial and 43 polymicrobial isolates). As far as the outcomes of follow-up visits are concerned, bacterial eradication was achieved in 213 cases though 135 were completely clinically cured. In the remaining 78 cases bacterial elimination was not accompanied by clinical improvement. Bacterial persistence occurred in 70 cases. 41 out of these were superinfections and the remaining 29 were true persistences. In conclusion, the data from the present study suggest that Gram-positive pathogens can be responsible for prostatic infection. Multidrug resistance for CoNS and Enterococci is an emerging medical problem that may cause important threats to public health in the future.
介绍/目的:慢性细菌性前列腺炎(CBP)是一种前列腺炎症,其特征是生殖器或骨盆区域疼痛,可能伴随泌尿系统疾病并可能导致性功能障碍。它是由多种泌尿系统病原体引起的,如革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性微生物。大多数革兰氏阳性微生物的致病性一直受到质疑,因为大多数权威专家将CBP病原体清单限制在单一的肠杆菌科和肠球菌类。为了明确革兰氏阳性微生物在CBP中的作用并探讨治疗方案,我们回顾了2008年以来的CBP病例数据库。材料:本回顾性研究的材料包括从尿液和/或前列腺分泌物或精子培养物(总射精)中分离出的革兰氏阳性细菌,这些分离物来自有或无下尿路症状和性功能障碍的慢性盆腔不适和生殖器疼痛患者,以及从2008年3月至2018年11月在希腊比雷埃夫斯Tzaneio县总医院泌尿外科就诊的CBP发热复发患者。对每位评估患者的人口学、微生物学和临床病史进行回顾。结果/结论:314株革兰氏阳性菌中有188株为单菌,126株为多菌。在阳性培养物中发现了多种革兰氏阳性细菌,其中凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(con,主要是血溶葡萄球菌、人型葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌和很少的lugdunensis)是最常见的病原体(85株单微生物和43株多微生物)。随访结果方面,临床完全治愈135例,细菌根除213例。在其余78例中,细菌消除未伴随临床改善。细菌持续存在70例。其中41例是重复感染,其余29例是真正的持续性感染。总之,本研究的数据表明革兰氏阳性病原体可能是前列腺感染的原因。con和肠球菌的多药耐药是一个新出现的医学问题,未来可能对公共卫生造成重大威胁。
{"title":"Gram-positive microorganisms isolated during Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis investigation. A retrospective study","authors":"K. Stamatiou, V. Magri, G. Perletti, Nektaria Rekleiti, R. Lacroix, H. Moschouris","doi":"10.19264/HJ.V30I4.249","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19264/HJ.V30I4.249","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Aim: Chronic bacterial prostatitis (CBP) is an inflammatory condition of the prostate that is characterized by pain in the genital or the pelvic area which may accompany urinary disorders and may cause sexual dysfunction. It caused by a variety of uropathogens such as Gram-negative and Gram-positive microorganisms. The pathogenicity of most Gram-positive microorganisms has been questioned, since most leading experts restrict the list of CBP pathogens to the sole Enterobacteriaceae plus Enterococcus spp. In order to clarify the role of Gram-positive microorganisms on CBP and investigate the treatment options we reviewed our database of CBP cases from 2008 onwards. Material: The material of this retrospective study consisted in Gram-positive bacterial isolates from urine and/or prostatic secretions or sperm cultures (total ejaculate) obtained from individuals with reported chronic pelvic discomfort and genital pain, with or without lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual dysfunction, and from patients with febrile relapses of CBP, visiting the Urology Department of the Tzaneio Prefecture General Hospital of Piraeus, Greece, from 03/2008 to 11/2018. Demographic, microbiological and clinical history of each assessed patient were reviewed. Results/Conclusions: In total, 188 out of 314 Gram-positive bacterial isolates were monomicrobial and the remaining 126 polymicrobial. A vast variety of Gram-positive bacteria was found in positive cultures, with coagulase negative Staphylococci (CoNS, mainly S. haemoliticus, S. hominis, S. epidermidis and rarely S. lugdunensis) being the most frequent pathogens (85 monomicrobial and 43 polymicrobial isolates). As far as the outcomes of follow-up visits are concerned, bacterial eradication was achieved in 213 cases though 135 were completely clinically cured. In the remaining 78 cases bacterial elimination was not accompanied by clinical improvement. Bacterial persistence occurred in 70 cases. 41 out of these were superinfections and the remaining 29 were true persistences. In conclusion, the data from the present study suggest that Gram-positive pathogens can be responsible for prostatic infection. Multidrug resistance for CoNS and Enterococci is an emerging medical problem that may cause important threats to public health in the future.","PeriodicalId":185530,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Urology","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134282955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Patient positioning during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): is there an optimal position? 经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)患者体位:是否有最佳体位?
Pub Date : 2019-03-14 DOI: 10.19264/HJ.V30I4.246
P. Mourmouris, M. Berdempes, Titos Markopoulos, L. Lazarou, L. Tzelves, A. Skolarikos
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is the gold standard procedure for large stones and complex kidney anatomy, but in the same time its morbidity remains the highest among stone treatment procedures. In pursuit of minimizing complication rates surgeons have developed different variations of the classic prone position but in the same time and with the same goal, supine position was introduced. In our study, we review the literature about all available evidence on different variations in positioning during PCNL, in an effort to clarify if there is a position that makes the difference in terms of minimizing the morbidity of this procedure.
经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)是大结石和复杂肾脏解剖结构的金标准手术,但同时其发病率仍然是结石治疗手术中最高的。为了最大限度地减少并发症的发生率,外科医生已经开发了经典俯卧位的不同变体,但在同一时间和同一目标下,引入了仰卧位。在我们的研究中,我们回顾了关于PCNL过程中不同体位变化的所有可用证据的文献,以澄清是否存在一种体位在最小化该手术的发病率方面产生差异。
{"title":"Patient positioning during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): is there an optimal position?","authors":"P. Mourmouris, M. Berdempes, Titos Markopoulos, L. Lazarou, L. Tzelves, A. Skolarikos","doi":"10.19264/HJ.V30I4.246","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19264/HJ.V30I4.246","url":null,"abstract":"Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is the gold standard procedure for large stones and complex kidney anatomy, but in the same time its morbidity remains the highest among stone treatment procedures. In pursuit of minimizing complication rates surgeons have developed different variations of the classic prone position but in the same time and with the same goal, supine position was introduced. In our study, we review the literature about all available evidence on different variations in positioning during PCNL, in an effort to clarify if there is a position that makes the difference in terms of minimizing the morbidity of this procedure.","PeriodicalId":185530,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Urology","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123681069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Can contrast-enhanced ultrasonography r substitute CT scan in postoperative renal tumor imaging? 超声造影能代替CT在肾肿瘤术后的影像学检查中应用吗?
Pub Date : 2019-03-14 DOI: 10.19264/HJ.V30I4.248
H. Moschouris, K. Stamatiou, S. Tzamarias, Dimitrios Zavradinos, K. Fokas, Konstantinos Zioutos, Vasilis Politis
Introduction/Purpose: Among its many applications, contrast- enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is used with very good results in oncology imaging to evaluate the effect of several therapeutic interventional radiology techniques. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of CEUS in postoperative renal tumor imaging. Material and Method: The study group consisted of 17 consecutive patients (11 males and 6 females, aged between 71 and 87) who underwent palliative embolization or chemoembolization of renal tumors between January 2008 and December 2017. All patients underwent preoperative imaging with CEUS and CT scan and they were followed postoperatively with CEUS and CT scan for up to 24 months after initial intervention. The ultrasound and CT operators were blind to each other’s findings. Results: CEUS proved to be an effective means of monitoring both arterial embolism and RFA of renal tumors with comparable findings with CT and could be an alternative technique to CT and MRI.
简介/目的:超声造影(CEUS)的众多应用中,超声造影(CEUS)在肿瘤成像中用于评价几种治疗性介入放射技术的效果,效果非常好。本研究的目的是评价超声造影在肾肿瘤术后的成像效果。材料和方法:研究组包括17例连续患者(男性11例,女性6例,年龄71 ~ 87岁),均于2008年1月至2017年12月期间接受了肾肿瘤姑息性栓塞或化疗栓塞治疗。所有患者术前均行超声造影和CT扫描,术后随访超声造影和CT扫描长达24个月。超声和CT操作员对彼此的发现一无所知。结果:超声造影被证明是监测肾肿瘤动脉栓塞和RFA的有效手段,其结果与CT相当,可作为CT和MRI的替代技术。
{"title":"Can contrast-enhanced ultrasonography r substitute CT scan in postoperative renal tumor imaging?","authors":"H. Moschouris, K. Stamatiou, S. Tzamarias, Dimitrios Zavradinos, K. Fokas, Konstantinos Zioutos, Vasilis Politis","doi":"10.19264/HJ.V30I4.248","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19264/HJ.V30I4.248","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Purpose: Among its many applications, contrast- enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is used with very good results in oncology imaging to evaluate the effect of several therapeutic interventional radiology techniques. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of CEUS in postoperative renal tumor imaging. Material and Method: The study group consisted of 17 consecutive patients (11 males and 6 females, aged between 71 and 87) who underwent palliative embolization or chemoembolization of renal tumors between January 2008 and December 2017. All patients underwent preoperative imaging with CEUS and CT scan and they were followed postoperatively with CEUS and CT scan for up to 24 months after initial intervention. The ultrasound and CT operators were blind to each other’s findings. Results: CEUS proved to be an effective means of monitoring both arterial embolism and RFA of renal tumors with comparable findings with CT and could be an alternative technique to CT and MRI.","PeriodicalId":185530,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Urology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124330812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of a Single Use Digital Ureteroscope to a Fiberoptic Ureteroscope During Retrograde Renolithotripsy 数字输尿管镜与光纤输尿管镜在逆行肾内碎石术中的比较
Pub Date : 2019-03-14 DOI: 10.19264/HJ.V30I4.250
L. Tzelves, G. Raptidis, Marinos Mperdembes, Titos Markopoulos, G. Dellis, I. Siafakas, A. Skolarikos
Introduction: Ureterorenoscopy is a common procedure for treatment of stone disease. LithoVue is a relatively new entry in urologist armamentarium and offers digital image as well as single use nature when compared with traditional fiber-optic, reusable ureteroscopes. We aim to compare periprocedural outcomes for stone disease when using these two types of ureteroscopes. Patients and Methods: Baseline demographic data, perioperative( procedural time, surgical equipment, complication and stone-free rates) and postoperative(complication rate, length of stay) variables were recorded for two groups of patients: one managed with LithoVue and another with fiber-optic flexible ureteroscope. Chi-square and Fisher's exact test was used to compare qualitative data and unpaired t-test for continuous data, with a statistical significance set at a=0.05. Results: LithoVue was utilized in 40 and fiber-optic ureteroscope in 37 patients. The two groups were balanced regarding their baseline characteristics. Mean operative time for LithoVue cases was 49.36 ± 14.48 minutes and 62.46 ± 16.60 minutes for fiber-optic ureteroscope (p<0.001), while intraoperative stone-free rate for LithoVue was 70% and 43% for fiber-optic ureteroscope(p<0.005). This difference was also detected 24 hours postoperatively. Conclusions: Our study indicates that LithoVue can be used safely as an alternative for flexible fiber-optic ureteroscopes when managing patients with stone disease. These results should be confirmed with randomized trials.
导读:输尿管镜检查是治疗结石疾病的常用方法。与传统的光纤输尿管镜和可重复使用输尿管镜相比,LithoVue输尿管镜是泌尿科设备中一个相对较新的条目,它提供了数字图像和一次性使用的特性。我们的目的是比较使用这两种输尿管镜治疗结石疾病的围手术期结果。患者和方法:记录两组患者的基线人口统计学数据、围手术期(手术时间、手术设备、并发症和无结石率)和术后(并发症率、住院时间)变量:一组使用LithoVue,另一组使用光纤输尿管软镜。定性资料采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验,连续资料采用非配对t检验,差异有统计学意义,差异设为a=0.05。结果:40例患者采用LithoVue输尿管镜,37例患者采用光纤输尿管镜。两组的基线特征是平衡的。LithoVue组平均手术时间为49.36±14.48 min,光纤输尿管镜组平均手术时间为62.46±16.60 min (p<0.001),术中结石清除率为70%,光纤输尿管镜组为43% (p<0.005)。这种差异也在术后24小时检测到。结论:我们的研究表明,在治疗结石患者时,LithoVue可以安全地作为柔性光纤输尿管镜的替代方案。这些结果应该通过随机试验来证实。
{"title":"Comparison of a Single Use Digital Ureteroscope to a Fiberoptic Ureteroscope During Retrograde Renolithotripsy","authors":"L. Tzelves, G. Raptidis, Marinos Mperdembes, Titos Markopoulos, G. Dellis, I. Siafakas, A. Skolarikos","doi":"10.19264/HJ.V30I4.250","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19264/HJ.V30I4.250","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Ureterorenoscopy is a common procedure for treatment of stone disease. LithoVue is a relatively new entry in urologist armamentarium and offers digital image as well as single use nature when compared with traditional fiber-optic, reusable ureteroscopes. We aim to compare periprocedural outcomes for stone disease when using these two types of ureteroscopes. Patients and Methods: Baseline demographic data, perioperative( procedural time, surgical equipment, complication and stone-free rates) and postoperative(complication rate, length of stay) variables were recorded for two groups of patients: one managed with LithoVue and another with fiber-optic flexible ureteroscope. Chi-square and Fisher's exact test was used to compare qualitative data and unpaired t-test for continuous data, with a statistical significance set at a=0.05. Results: LithoVue was utilized in 40 and fiber-optic ureteroscope in 37 patients. The two groups were balanced regarding their baseline characteristics. Mean operative time for LithoVue cases was 49.36 ± 14.48 minutes and 62.46 ± 16.60 minutes for fiber-optic ureteroscope (p<0.001), while intraoperative stone-free rate for LithoVue was 70% and 43% for fiber-optic ureteroscope(p<0.005). This difference was also detected 24 hours postoperatively. Conclusions: Our study indicates that LithoVue can be used safely as an alternative for flexible fiber-optic ureteroscopes when managing patients with stone disease. These results should be confirmed with randomized trials.","PeriodicalId":185530,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Urology","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115015860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery) Versus Fluoroscopic-guided Renal Access during supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Comparative Study 仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中内镜联合肾内手术(ECIRS)与透视引导下肾通路的比较研究
Pub Date : 2018-10-17 DOI: 10.19264/hj.v30i3.241
S. Kontos, A. Papatsoris, S. Nalagatla
Objective: To evaluate the intra- and post-operative outcomes of percutaneous renal access using either ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery) or fluoroscopic-guided renal access for supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Methods: In our institute, over a 24-month period (April 2012 to March 2014), two surgeons performed a total of 68 PCNLs (not consecutive staghorn stone cases); 33 ECIRS and 35 fluoroscopically- guided access (FGA). All patient and calculi demographics were recorded, as well as intra-operative parameters and complication/secondary procedure rates. Results: We demonstrate that ECIRS offers rapid operating time (total procedure time 113 vs. 142 min, p<0.05), low complication rates (sepsis (0% vs. 5.8%), transfusion (0% vs. 8.6%) or bowel injury (0%)), with reduced in-patient stay (2 vs. 4 days, p<0.05) and high rates of stone clearance/residual fragments <4mm (3% vs. 25.7%, p<0.05) and low rate of secondary procedure (6.1% vs. 31.4%, p<0.05). Conclusion: ECIRS offers shorter operating times, with low complication rates, higher rates of stone clearance and a reduced requirement for secondary procedures in comparison to purely FGA. We envisage that this is due to a combination of quicker and more accurate needle placement, as well as the ability to perform concomitant FURS and laser stone fragmentation.
目的:评价内镜联合肾内手术(ECIRS)或透视引导下经皮肾入路在仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中的术中及术后效果。方法:我院于2012年4月至2014年3月24个月期间,2位外科医生共行pcnl 68例(非连续的鹿角石病例);33个ECIRS和35个FGA。记录所有患者和结石的人口统计数据,以及术中参数和并发症/二次手术率。结果:我们证明ECIRS的手术时间短(总手术时间113比142分钟,p<0.05),并发症发生率低(败血症(0%比5.8%),输血(0%比8.6%)或肠损伤(0%)),住院时间短(2比4天,p<0.05),结石清除率高/残余碎片<4mm(3%比25.7%,p<0.05),二次手术率低(6.1%比31.4%,p<0.05)。结论:与单纯的FGA相比,ECIRS手术时间短,并发症发生率低,结石清除率高,对二次手术的需求减少。我们设想,这是由于更快、更准确的针头放置,以及同时进行FURS和激光碎裂的能力。
{"title":"ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery) Versus Fluoroscopic-guided Renal Access during supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Comparative Study","authors":"S. Kontos, A. Papatsoris, S. Nalagatla","doi":"10.19264/hj.v30i3.241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19264/hj.v30i3.241","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the intra- and post-operative outcomes of percutaneous renal access using either ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery) or fluoroscopic-guided renal access for supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Methods: In our institute, over a 24-month period (April 2012 to March 2014), two surgeons performed a total of 68 PCNLs (not consecutive staghorn stone cases); 33 ECIRS and 35 fluoroscopically- guided access (FGA). All patient and calculi demographics were recorded, as well as intra-operative parameters and complication/secondary procedure rates. Results: We demonstrate that ECIRS offers rapid operating time (total procedure time 113 vs. 142 min, p<0.05), low complication rates (sepsis (0% vs. 5.8%), transfusion (0% vs. 8.6%) or bowel injury (0%)), with reduced in-patient stay (2 vs. 4 days, p<0.05) and high rates of stone clearance/residual fragments <4mm (3% vs. 25.7%, p<0.05) and low rate of secondary procedure (6.1% vs. 31.4%, p<0.05). Conclusion: ECIRS offers shorter operating times, with low complication rates, higher rates of stone clearance and a reduced requirement for secondary procedures in comparison to purely FGA. We envisage that this is due to a combination of quicker and more accurate needle placement, as well as the ability to perform concomitant FURS and laser stone fragmentation.","PeriodicalId":185530,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Urology","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121069603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Initial experience with extraperitoneal monopolarless laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a secondary hospital of Greece 希腊一家二级医院腹腔外无单极腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的初步经验
Pub Date : 2018-10-17 DOI: 10.19264/HJ.V30I3.243
I. Kyriazis, D. Dimitriou, M. Karavitakis, E. Liatsikos, A. Thanos
Aim of the study: To report the prospectively collected outcomes of our initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a secondary hospital of Greece. Materials and methods: In total 15 cases with localized prostate cancer (3x low risk, 5x intermediate risk and 7x high risk) and a mean age of 70 years (range 58-79) were operated during a 9 month period in our department. All operations were performed by a single laparoscopic surgeon under the supervision of two senior experienced open surgeons and the assistance of an assistant experienced in laparoscopic prostatectomy. Results: No case was converted into open surgery. Mean operating time (OT) dropped gradually from 5.5 hours in the beginning of our experience to up to 2 hours with a mean OT of 3.2 hours including 6 cases where a pelvic lymph node dissection was deemed necessary. Blood loss was minimum in all cases and no transfusion was required. All but 3 cases (80%) were discharged on the first postoperative day and catheter was removed 5 days later under cystographic verification of anastomotic water tightness in the vast majority of cases. Positive surgical margins (PSMs) were present in 5 patients (33%). Immediate continence after catheter removal was evident in 53% of our cases and early continence (continent within 2weeks from catheter removal) in 60%. Out of 10 patients having completed a 3month follow-up, 80% (8/10) were pad free. Both two incontinent patients still use 1 pad per day and include one case with immediate continence which started leaking after salvage radiotherapy initiation. PSA failure (>0.2ng/ dL) at 3 months was evident in 3 (30%) of patients including one patient operated with a PSA of 136ng/dL and two patients without PSMs. All these cases were included in the first 6 operated cases and were scheduled for salvage radiation treatment. At a mean of 56 days post prostatectomy, potency was restored in 3 patients following a penile rehabilitation protocol after surgery while none of the rest of patients requested further treatment for impotency. Conclusions: In the hands of a well-trained surgical group, perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy during the initial phases of learning curve is minimum. Early continence outcomes can reach comparative levels with the high volume center literature after the very first cases. Initial oncological outcomes were inferior to the published literature yet they were most likely due to case selection (older patients with adverse pathology) than due to limitations of the operative technique.
研究目的:报告我们在希腊一家二级医院进行腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的初步经验的前瞻性收集结果。材料与方法:在我科9个月的时间内共手术15例局限性前列腺癌,其中低危3例,中危5例,高危7例,平均年龄70岁(58 ~ 79岁)。所有手术均由一名腹腔镜外科医生在两名经验丰富的资深开放外科医生的指导下进行,并在一名经验丰富的腹腔镜前列腺切除术助理的协助下进行。结果:无一例中转开腹手术。平均手术时间(OT)从我们经验开始时的5.5小时逐渐下降到2小时,平均OT为3.2小时,包括6例盆腔淋巴结清扫被认为是必要的。在所有病例中,失血量最小,不需要输血。除3例(80%)外,其余均于术后第1天出院,绝大多数病例经膀胱造影证实吻合口水密性,5天后拔除导管。5例(33%)患者存在手术切缘阳性(psm)。拔除导管后立即尿失禁的病例占53%,早期尿失禁(拔除导管后2周内尿失禁)占60%。在完成3个月随访的10例患者中,80%(8/10)无尿垫。2例尿失禁患者仍每天使用1块尿垫,其中1例在补救性放疗开始后出现立即尿失禁。3例(30%)患者在3个月时PSA明显失败(>0.2ng/ dL),包括1例PSA为136ng/dL的患者和2例无psm的患者。所有病例均列入首批6例手术病例,并计划进行补救性放射治疗。在前列腺切除术后平均56天,3例患者在手术后阴茎康复方案下功能恢复,其余患者均未要求进一步治疗阳痿。结论:在训练有素的手术组的手中,腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期发病率在学习曲线的初始阶段是最低的。早期失禁的结果可以达到与高容量中心文献的比较水平。最初的肿瘤学结果不如已发表的文献,但它们最有可能是由于病例选择(病理不良的老年患者)而不是由于手术技术的限制。
{"title":"Initial experience with extraperitoneal monopolarless laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a secondary hospital of Greece","authors":"I. Kyriazis, D. Dimitriou, M. Karavitakis, E. Liatsikos, A. Thanos","doi":"10.19264/HJ.V30I3.243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19264/HJ.V30I3.243","url":null,"abstract":"Aim of the study: To report the prospectively collected outcomes of our initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a secondary hospital of Greece. Materials and methods: In total 15 cases with localized prostate cancer (3x low risk, 5x intermediate risk and 7x high risk) and a mean age of 70 years (range 58-79) were operated during a 9 month period in our department. All operations were performed by a single laparoscopic surgeon under the supervision of two senior experienced open surgeons and the assistance of an assistant experienced in laparoscopic prostatectomy. Results: No case was converted into open surgery. Mean operating time (OT) dropped gradually from 5.5 hours in the beginning of our experience to up to 2 hours with a mean OT of 3.2 hours including 6 cases where a pelvic lymph node dissection was deemed necessary. Blood loss was minimum in all cases and no transfusion was required. All but 3 cases (80%) were discharged on the first postoperative day and catheter was removed 5 days later under cystographic verification of anastomotic water tightness in the vast majority of cases. Positive surgical margins (PSMs) were present in 5 patients (33%). Immediate continence after catheter removal was evident in 53% of our cases and early continence (continent within 2weeks from catheter removal) in 60%. Out of 10 patients having completed a 3month follow-up, 80% (8/10) were pad free. Both two incontinent patients still use 1 pad per day and include one case with immediate continence which started leaking after salvage radiotherapy initiation. PSA failure (>0.2ng/ dL) at 3 months was evident in 3 (30%) of patients including one patient operated with a PSA of 136ng/dL and two patients without PSMs. All these cases were included in the first 6 operated cases and were scheduled for salvage radiation treatment. At a mean of 56 days post prostatectomy, potency was restored in 3 patients following a penile rehabilitation protocol after surgery while none of the rest of patients requested further treatment for impotency. Conclusions: In the hands of a well-trained surgical group, perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy during the initial phases of learning curve is minimum. Early continence outcomes can reach comparative levels with the high volume center literature after the very first cases. Initial oncological outcomes were inferior to the published literature yet they were most likely due to case selection (older patients with adverse pathology) than due to limitations of the operative technique.","PeriodicalId":185530,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Urology","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133692042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Hellenic Urology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1