Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-01-11DOI: 10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05408-8
Kristy K Cho, Chen Jing, Niamh M Tallon
Background: The objectives of this study are to evaluate the cycle outcomes from IVF treatment preceded by oral contraceptive pills (OCP) priming compared to estradiol pretreatment and to determine if there is a role for OCP priming for those undergoing frozen embryo transfers.
Methods: The study took place at a university-affiliated fertility center in Canada. The study included in-vitro fertilization (IVF) antagonist cycles from Jan 2016 to Jun 2019. Those with protocol deviation or treatment cancellation were excluded.
Results: There were 2237 cycles by 1958 patients; 27% of cycles utilized OCP priming. The average age in the OCP group was 34 years old compared to 36.5 in the estradiol group (P<0.01). AMH was reported in 43% of patients and was 3.7ng/mL in the OCP group versus 2.2 ng/mL in the estradiol group (P<0.01). The number of oocytes (15.2 vs. 12.5) and number of blastocysts (4.6 vs. 3.3) were higher in the OCP group (P all <0.01). After adjusting for age and AMH with linear regression for the 978 cycles with recorded AMH (24% with OCP prime), a significantly higher number of oocytes (13.8 vs. 11.9, P=0.002) was still noted in the OCP group. There were 866 euploid embryo transfer cycles (28% with OCP prime). There were no significant differences in implantation (77% vs. 76%) or ongoing pregnancy rates (56% vs. 54%) between those who had a frozen embryo transfer after OCP primed compared to estradiol primed stimulation cycles (P all >0.6).
Conclusions: There were no differences in pregnancy outcomes from euploid frozen blastocyst transfers after OCP primed antagonist cycles compared to estradiol pretreatment. In fact, the use of OCP pretreatment was associated with increased oocyte yield, keeping in mind demographic differences with the OCP pretreatment group being younger with higher anti-Müllerian hormone and a higher prevalence of PCOS. Thus, OCP priming should still be considered in specific populations, such as those with oligo-ovulation or adequate ovarian reserve.
{"title":"The use of combined hormonal contraceptive for in-vitro fertilization cycle priming is not associated with decreased pregnancy rate in frozen embryo transfer cycles: a cohort study.","authors":"Kristy K Cho, Chen Jing, Niamh M Tallon","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05408-8","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05408-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objectives of this study are to evaluate the cycle outcomes from IVF treatment preceded by oral contraceptive pills (OCP) priming compared to estradiol pretreatment and to determine if there is a role for OCP priming for those undergoing frozen embryo transfers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study took place at a university-affiliated fertility center in Canada. The study included in-vitro fertilization (IVF) antagonist cycles from Jan 2016 to Jun 2019. Those with protocol deviation or treatment cancellation were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2237 cycles by 1958 patients; 27% of cycles utilized OCP priming. The average age in the OCP group was 34 years old compared to 36.5 in the estradiol group (P<0.01). AMH was reported in 43% of patients and was 3.7ng/mL in the OCP group versus 2.2 ng/mL in the estradiol group (P<0.01). The number of oocytes (15.2 vs. 12.5) and number of blastocysts (4.6 vs. 3.3) were higher in the OCP group (P all <0.01). After adjusting for age and AMH with linear regression for the 978 cycles with recorded AMH (24% with OCP prime), a significantly higher number of oocytes (13.8 vs. 11.9, P=0.002) was still noted in the OCP group. There were 866 euploid embryo transfer cycles (28% with OCP prime). There were no significant differences in implantation (77% vs. 76%) or ongoing pregnancy rates (56% vs. 54%) between those who had a frozen embryo transfer after OCP primed compared to estradiol primed stimulation cycles (P all >0.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no differences in pregnancy outcomes from euploid frozen blastocyst transfers after OCP primed antagonist cycles compared to estradiol pretreatment. In fact, the use of OCP pretreatment was associated with increased oocyte yield, keeping in mind demographic differences with the OCP pretreatment group being younger with higher anti-Müllerian hormone and a higher prevalence of PCOS. Thus, OCP priming should still be considered in specific populations, such as those with oligo-ovulation or adequate ovarian reserve.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"12-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139425082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S2724-606X.25.05768-9
Antonio La Marca
{"title":"Highlights of the January-February 2025 issue.","authors":"Antonio La Marca","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.25.05768-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.25.05768-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"77 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143812059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2023-08-04DOI: 10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05344-7
Alessandro Libretti, Christian Corsini, Valentino Remorgida
Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C or FGM) are injuries to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons. Every year, over 4 million girls are at risk of FGM. Complications of this practice are very common and some of them are still under investigation. The purpose of this short narrative review is to highlight and summarize the main ones. Psychologic and psychiatric sequelae, chronic vulvar pain, urogenital symptoms, pelvic organs prolapse, sexual disfunction, cervical dysplasia and infections resulted as chronic sequalae of FGM. Severe pain, excessive bleeding, and tissues swelling are acute consequences of FGM. Rates of caesarean section, time of second stage of delivery, post-partum blood loss (but not major hemorrhage), peri-clitoral and perineal injuries and episiotomy rates are higher in pregnant women with FGM, when compared with those non victims of mutilation. The female genital mutilation practice is often cause of severe urogynecologic, psychologic and obstetrics sequelae. Although several studies have been carried out on FMG complications and treatments, long term sequelae are still very common and deserve major attention and further research.
{"title":"What's new on female genital mutilation/cutting? Recent findings about urogynecologic complications, psychological issues, and obstetric outcomes.","authors":"Alessandro Libretti, Christian Corsini, Valentino Remorgida","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05344-7","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05344-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C or FGM) are injuries to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons. Every year, over 4 million girls are at risk of FGM. Complications of this practice are very common and some of them are still under investigation. The purpose of this short narrative review is to highlight and summarize the main ones. Psychologic and psychiatric sequelae, chronic vulvar pain, urogenital symptoms, pelvic organs prolapse, sexual disfunction, cervical dysplasia and infections resulted as chronic sequalae of FGM. Severe pain, excessive bleeding, and tissues swelling are acute consequences of FGM. Rates of caesarean section, time of second stage of delivery, post-partum blood loss (but not major hemorrhage), peri-clitoral and perineal injuries and episiotomy rates are higher in pregnant women with FGM, when compared with those non victims of mutilation. The female genital mutilation practice is often cause of severe urogynecologic, psychologic and obstetrics sequelae. Although several studies have been carried out on FMG complications and treatments, long term sequelae are still very common and deserve major attention and further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"56-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9925493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-03-27DOI: 10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05425-8
Saeed Baradwan, Majed S Alshahrani, Khalid Khadawardi, Maha Tulbah, Osama Alomar, Abdullah Alyousef, Ibtihal A Bukhari, Ahmed Abu-Zaid
Background: We investigated the potential association between Marfan Syndrome (MFS) and adverse obstetric outcomes using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.
Methods: We utilized the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) system to identify relevant codes and extracted data from the NIS database covering the period 2016-2019. Descriptive statistics and χ2 tests were employed to summarize and compare baseline characteristics. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses (adjusted for age, race, hospital region, smoking status, and alcohol misuse) were conducted to evaluate association between MFS and adverse obstetric outcomes. The regression analyses were summarized as Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: Among the 2,854,149 pregnant individuals, 179 had MFS. Baseline characteristics revealed significant associations between MFS and age, race, and hospital location. Univariate analysis showed MFS individuals had significantly increased risks of amniotic fluid/membrane abnormalities (AFAs, OR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.01-2.68, P=0.045) and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH, OR=3.73, 95% CI: 2.41-5.78, P<0.001). Several obstetric outcomes showed some trends towards increased (multiple gestation, placenta previa, and preterm labor) and decreased (premature rupture of membrane, gestational diabetes, and preeclampsia) obstetric risks with MFS; however, they were not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis showed MFS was significantly associated with increased risks of AFAs (adjusted OR=1.68, 95% CI: 1.03-2.74, P=0.037) and PPH (adjusted OR=3.62, 95% CI: 2.31-5.68, P<0.001).
Conclusions: MFS is associated with increased risks of adverse obstetric outcomes, specifically AFAs and PPH. These results highlight the importance of monitoring these specific pregnancy outcomes in MFS individuals to ensure optimal maternal-fetal health.
{"title":"Insights on obstetric outcomes in pregnant individuals with Marfan Syndrome: evidence from the National Inpatient Sample.","authors":"Saeed Baradwan, Majed S Alshahrani, Khalid Khadawardi, Maha Tulbah, Osama Alomar, Abdullah Alyousef, Ibtihal A Bukhari, Ahmed Abu-Zaid","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05425-8","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05425-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We investigated the potential association between Marfan Syndrome (MFS) and adverse obstetric outcomes using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) system to identify relevant codes and extracted data from the NIS database covering the period 2016-2019. Descriptive statistics and χ<sup>2</sup> tests were employed to summarize and compare baseline characteristics. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses (adjusted for age, race, hospital region, smoking status, and alcohol misuse) were conducted to evaluate association between MFS and adverse obstetric outcomes. The regression analyses were summarized as Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2,854,149 pregnant individuals, 179 had MFS. Baseline characteristics revealed significant associations between MFS and age, race, and hospital location. Univariate analysis showed MFS individuals had significantly increased risks of amniotic fluid/membrane abnormalities (AFAs, OR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.01-2.68, P=0.045) and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH, OR=3.73, 95% CI: 2.41-5.78, P<0.001). Several obstetric outcomes showed some trends towards increased (multiple gestation, placenta previa, and preterm labor) and decreased (premature rupture of membrane, gestational diabetes, and preeclampsia) obstetric risks with MFS; however, they were not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis showed MFS was significantly associated with increased risks of AFAs (adjusted OR=1.68, 95% CI: 1.03-2.74, P=0.037) and PPH (adjusted OR=3.62, 95% CI: 2.31-5.68, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MFS is associated with increased risks of adverse obstetric outcomes, specifically AFAs and PPH. These results highlight the importance of monitoring these specific pregnancy outcomes in MFS individuals to ensure optimal maternal-fetal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"27-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140293948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Contraceptive use in adolescence remains a challenging issue. Adolescents are at high risk of unintended pregnancies and sexual transmitted infections. During the past few decades intrauterine devices are recommended from global health organization, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and World Health Organization as a method of contraception for adolescents. Intrauterine devices are part of the long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) and include the copper bearing device (CU-IUD) and the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). IUDs are a safe and effective contraceptive method for adolescents with a failure rate less than 1%. Their use is not limited only in contraception. LNG-IUS 52 mg is approved for treating heavy menstrual bleeding and protection from endometrial hyperplasia in women receiving hormone replacement therapy. It can also be an effective tool in the management of dysmenorrhea, while CU-IUD can provide emergency contraception. Nevertheless, IUDs remain underutilized in this group of population. Adolescents' lack of proper education about contraception and sexual behavior creates myths and misconceptions about the possible side effects and the suitability of IUDs in this age group. Furthermore, health care providers remain skeptical and hesitate to suggest IUDs to adolescents. Other barriers including high cost, concern about confidentiality and difficulties in access contribute to its limited use. It is of high importance to eliminate barriers and offer more accessible contraceptive services to adolescents.
{"title":"Intrauterine device use in adolescence: a narrative review.","authors":"Aikaterini Zoi, Anastasia Vatopoulou, Xara Skentou, Orestis Tsonis, Georgia Galaziou, Nikoleta Koutalia, Kalypso Margariti, Eftychia Chatzisavva, Minas Paschopoulos, Fani Gkrozou","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05405-8","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05405-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contraceptive use in adolescence remains a challenging issue. Adolescents are at high risk of unintended pregnancies and sexual transmitted infections. During the past few decades intrauterine devices are recommended from global health organization, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and World Health Organization as a method of contraception for adolescents. Intrauterine devices are part of the long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) and include the copper bearing device (CU-IUD) and the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). IUDs are a safe and effective contraceptive method for adolescents with a failure rate less than 1%. Their use is not limited only in contraception. LNG-IUS 52 mg is approved for treating heavy menstrual bleeding and protection from endometrial hyperplasia in women receiving hormone replacement therapy. It can also be an effective tool in the management of dysmenorrhea, while CU-IUD can provide emergency contraception. Nevertheless, IUDs remain underutilized in this group of population. Adolescents' lack of proper education about contraception and sexual behavior creates myths and misconceptions about the possible side effects and the suitability of IUDs in this age group. Furthermore, health care providers remain skeptical and hesitate to suggest IUDs to adolescents. Other barriers including high cost, concern about confidentiality and difficulties in access contribute to its limited use. It is of high importance to eliminate barriers and offer more accessible contraceptive services to adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"45-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142391751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-12-20DOI: 10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05549-0
Marcelo B Cavalcante, Manoel Sarno, Ricardo Barini
Reproductive failures, such as recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and recurrent implantation failures (RIF) are a major challenge for reproductive medicine. The current management of RPL and RIF cases identifies some causes for unsuccessful pregnancy in up to half of patients. Several studies have suggested that immune disorders are responsible for an important portion of unexplained cases of RPL and RIF. Moreover, the immune abnormalities responsible for reproductive failures can be classified into disorders related to autoimmunity and changes in cellular immunity. Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), testing for antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid antibodies are identified as biomarkers of autoimmunity that can predict reproductive failure. The cellular immune response in cases of RPL and RIF can be investigated through the study of natural killer (NK) cells (uterine and peripheral blood) and T lymphocytes (T helper [Th]-1, Th-2, regulatory T and Th-17 cells). Several types of laboratory assays have been used to evaluate the endometrial immune microenvironment, such as the endometrial immune profile and decidualization score. However, the effectiveness of the treatment of RPL and RIF with immunomodulatory drugs has not yet been confirmed. Recently, a group of experts from the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology recommended the investigation of some immune factors and treatment with immunosuppressants in women with RPL. In conclusion, it is important to consider immune abnormalities when managing women with RPL and RIF. The use of immunotherapies must be personalized and based on a specific diagnosis to obtain favorable outcomes.
{"title":"Immune biomarkers in cases of recurrent pregnancy loss and recurrent implantation failure.","authors":"Marcelo B Cavalcante, Manoel Sarno, Ricardo Barini","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05549-0","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05549-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reproductive failures, such as recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and recurrent implantation failures (RIF) are a major challenge for reproductive medicine. The current management of RPL and RIF cases identifies some causes for unsuccessful pregnancy in up to half of patients. Several studies have suggested that immune disorders are responsible for an important portion of unexplained cases of RPL and RIF. Moreover, the immune abnormalities responsible for reproductive failures can be classified into disorders related to autoimmunity and changes in cellular immunity. Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), testing for antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid antibodies are identified as biomarkers of autoimmunity that can predict reproductive failure. The cellular immune response in cases of RPL and RIF can be investigated through the study of natural killer (NK) cells (uterine and peripheral blood) and T lymphocytes (T helper [Th]-1, Th-2, regulatory T and Th-17 cells). Several types of laboratory assays have been used to evaluate the endometrial immune microenvironment, such as the endometrial immune profile and decidualization score. However, the effectiveness of the treatment of RPL and RIF with immunomodulatory drugs has not yet been confirmed. Recently, a group of experts from the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology recommended the investigation of some immune factors and treatment with immunosuppressants in women with RPL. In conclusion, it is important to consider immune abnormalities when managing women with RPL and RIF. The use of immunotherapies must be personalized and based on a specific diagnosis to obtain favorable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"34-44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142864883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2023-11-28DOI: 10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05358-7
M Carolina Carneiro, Patrícia G Ferreira, Susana M Saraiva, Cátia D Rodrigues, Susana Leitão, Cristina M Costa, Maria da Soledade Ferreira
Background: The study aimed to evaluate the rate of endometrial sampling (ES) failure, predictive factors of success, and reliability as diagnostic methods of Endosampler versus Novak.
Methods: A retrospective single-center study was carried out with all patients who underwent ES via Endosampler or Novak in 2020 and 2021. Demographic data, personal background, and histopathologic results were evaluated.
Results: Eighty-six patients underwent ES by Novak and 90 by Endosampler. The failure rate of ES was 43.2% with lower values for Endosampler (33.3% vs. 53.5%, P<0.05). Age, biopsy device, menopausal status, indication for biopsy, and amount of sample collected were predictive factors of failure. Analyzing each device, Endosampler was only affected by menopausal status. Only 50% in Novak and 62.5% in the Endosampler group of endometrial neoplasia cases were detected by these methods. Analyzing the performance for endometrial neoplasia (EN), we obtained higher values of sensitivity and accuracy for Endosampler (62.5% vs. 50.0% and 83.3% vs. 72.7%), respectively.
Conclusions: In our study, the failure rate obtained was in line with other previous studies. Menopausal status, age, type of biopsy device, indication for biopsy, and amount of sample collected affected ES performance. Analyzing diagnostic performance for EN, we found that these methods have better reliability for positive results than for negative ones, which may indicate the need for further evaluation in cases of high clinical suspicion. In short, we obtain a higher rate of success rate in Endosampler devices and better performance in diagnosing EN, which is the major objective of an ES.
背景:本研究旨在评估子宫内膜取样(ES)失败率,成功的预测因素,以及作为Endosampler与Novak诊断方法的可靠性。方法:对2020年和2021年通过Endosampler或Novak接受ES治疗的所有患者进行回顾性单中心研究。对人口统计资料、个人背景和组织病理学结果进行评估。结果:86例采用Novak法,90例采用Endosampler法。ES的不合格率为43.2%,而Endosampler的不合格率更低(33.3% vs. 53.5%)。结论:在我们的研究中,得到的不合格率与其他研究一致。绝经状态、年龄、活检设备类型、活检适应症和采集的样本量影响ES的表现。通过对EN的诊断性能分析,我们发现这些方法对阳性结果的可靠性高于阴性结果,这可能表明在临床高度怀疑的病例中需要进一步评估。总之,我们在Endosampler设备上获得了更高的成功率和更好的诊断EN的性能,这是ES的主要目标。
{"title":"Office endometrial sampling: effectiveness and predictive factors of success in Novak versus Endosampler devices.","authors":"M Carolina Carneiro, Patrícia G Ferreira, Susana M Saraiva, Cátia D Rodrigues, Susana Leitão, Cristina M Costa, Maria da Soledade Ferreira","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05358-7","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05358-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the rate of endometrial sampling (ES) failure, predictive factors of success, and reliability as diagnostic methods of Endosampler versus Novak.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single-center study was carried out with all patients who underwent ES via Endosampler or Novak in 2020 and 2021. Demographic data, personal background, and histopathologic results were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-six patients underwent ES by Novak and 90 by Endosampler. The failure rate of ES was 43.2% with lower values for Endosampler (33.3% vs. 53.5%, P<0.05). Age, biopsy device, menopausal status, indication for biopsy, and amount of sample collected were predictive factors of failure. Analyzing each device, Endosampler was only affected by menopausal status. Only 50% in Novak and 62.5% in the Endosampler group of endometrial neoplasia cases were detected by these methods. Analyzing the performance for endometrial neoplasia (EN), we obtained higher values of sensitivity and accuracy for Endosampler (62.5% vs. 50.0% and 83.3% vs. 72.7%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, the failure rate obtained was in line with other previous studies. Menopausal status, age, type of biopsy device, indication for biopsy, and amount of sample collected affected ES performance. Analyzing diagnostic performance for EN, we found that these methods have better reliability for positive results than for negative ones, which may indicate the need for further evaluation in cases of high clinical suspicion. In short, we obtain a higher rate of success rate in Endosampler devices and better performance in diagnosing EN, which is the major objective of an ES.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"522-531"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138445435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-08DOI: 10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05452-6
Tullio Golia D'Augè, Ilaria Cuccu, Emanuele DE Angelis, Violante DI Donato, Ludovico Muzii, Ottavia D'Oria, Vito Chiantera, Sandro Gerli, Donatella Caserta, Aris R Besharat, Antonio S Laganà, Giorgio Bogani, Alessandro Favilli, Andrea Giannini
Ovarian cancer affects thousands of women every year and represents the female cancer with the highest mortality rate. Effectively, it is a severe disease that requires a multidisciplinary approach for optimal treatment. Surgery currently is the cornerstone of its treatment and numerous methods have been analyzed and developed to predict the possibility of obtaining a residual tumor of 0 (RT=0). This review aimed to analyze the available data in the literature about minimally invasive surgical methods to predict an RT=0 in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma undergoing primary debulking surgery. An accurate review of the literature has been performed on the available data about the surgical criteria of cytoreducibility during primary debulking surgery. An accurate assessment of the extent of intra- and extra-abdominal pathology is essential to guide the surgeon in the most appropriate therapeutic choice for patients with ovarian cancer and multidisciplinary approaches that combine different methodologies such as radiological methods (magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography and computed tomography), surgical (mini-laparotomy, laparoscopy) and serological (CA-125, HE4) data provide a complete picture in determining the extent of the tumor and an enormous aid in personalizing the therapeutic approach.
{"title":"Laparoscopic prediction of primary cytoreducibility of epithelial ovarian cancer.","authors":"Tullio Golia D'Augè, Ilaria Cuccu, Emanuele DE Angelis, Violante DI Donato, Ludovico Muzii, Ottavia D'Oria, Vito Chiantera, Sandro Gerli, Donatella Caserta, Aris R Besharat, Antonio S Laganà, Giorgio Bogani, Alessandro Favilli, Andrea Giannini","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05452-6","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05452-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ovarian cancer affects thousands of women every year and represents the female cancer with the highest mortality rate. Effectively, it is a severe disease that requires a multidisciplinary approach for optimal treatment. Surgery currently is the cornerstone of its treatment and numerous methods have been analyzed and developed to predict the possibility of obtaining a residual tumor of 0 (RT=0). This review aimed to analyze the available data in the literature about minimally invasive surgical methods to predict an RT=0 in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma undergoing primary debulking surgery. An accurate review of the literature has been performed on the available data about the surgical criteria of cytoreducibility during primary debulking surgery. An accurate assessment of the extent of intra- and extra-abdominal pathology is essential to guide the surgeon in the most appropriate therapeutic choice for patients with ovarian cancer and multidisciplinary approaches that combine different methodologies such as radiological methods (magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography and computed tomography), surgical (mini-laparotomy, laparoscopy) and serological (CA-125, HE4) data provide a complete picture in determining the extent of the tumor and an enormous aid in personalizing the therapeutic approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"548-557"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142391754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-09-16DOI: 10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05594-5
Christian Battipaglia, Alessandro D Genazzani, Rossella E Nappi, Antonio La Marca
Estetrol (E4) is a natural estrogen that has recently emerged as new option for contraception and hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Unlike other estrogens, E4 primarily stimulates nuclear estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and does not activate membrane ERα. For this reason, this novel estrogen has tissue-specific effects across various organs such as liver, vascular endothelium, mammary glands, brain, vagina, and uterus. The selective activation of the nuclear ERα results in distinct pharmacological properties that contribute to its unique therapeutic profile. Moreover, E4 shows minimal interaction with the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme system, leading to a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and a reduced potential for drug-drug interactions. Currently, E4 is commercially available in combination with drospirenone as a combined oral contraceptive and its application in HRT is undergoing late-stage clinical development. Many studies have demonstrated that E4 has a lower impact on hemostatic and metabolic parameters compared to other estrogens, potentially reducing the risk of adverse effects commonly associated with hormonal therapies such as thromboembolic events or dyslipidemia. Beyond its role in contraception and HRT, E4 shows promising therapeutic potential in other medical fields, including neuroprotection in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, enhancement of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation outcomes and prostate cancer management. This review synthesizes the latest evidence on E4 primarily focusing on its pharmacological characteristics and clinical applications. The findings suggest that E4 versatility and peculiar mechanism of action may represent an important therapeutic option for a broad spectrum of medical conditions.
{"title":"Insights on estetrol, the native estrogen: from contraception to hormone replacement therapy.","authors":"Christian Battipaglia, Alessandro D Genazzani, Rossella E Nappi, Antonio La Marca","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05594-5","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05594-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Estetrol (E4) is a natural estrogen that has recently emerged as new option for contraception and hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Unlike other estrogens, E4 primarily stimulates nuclear estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and does not activate membrane ERα. For this reason, this novel estrogen has tissue-specific effects across various organs such as liver, vascular endothelium, mammary glands, brain, vagina, and uterus. The selective activation of the nuclear ERα results in distinct pharmacological properties that contribute to its unique therapeutic profile. Moreover, E4 shows minimal interaction with the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme system, leading to a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and a reduced potential for drug-drug interactions. Currently, E4 is commercially available in combination with drospirenone as a combined oral contraceptive and its application in HRT is undergoing late-stage clinical development. Many studies have demonstrated that E4 has a lower impact on hemostatic and metabolic parameters compared to other estrogens, potentially reducing the risk of adverse effects commonly associated with hormonal therapies such as thromboembolic events or dyslipidemia. Beyond its role in contraception and HRT, E4 shows promising therapeutic potential in other medical fields, including neuroprotection in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, enhancement of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation outcomes and prostate cancer management. This review synthesizes the latest evidence on E4 primarily focusing on its pharmacological characteristics and clinical applications. The findings suggest that E4 versatility and peculiar mechanism of action may represent an important therapeutic option for a broad spectrum of medical conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"590-603"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142291098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-03-27DOI: 10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05337-5
Konstantinos Palaiologos, Rebecca Karkia, Zoi Nikoloudaki, Ahmed Mohamed, Rebecca Lavelle, Susanne Booth, Marina Flynn, Christopher Helbren, Matthew Simms, Theo Giannopoulos
Background: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is an extensive surgery that is indicated in cases of recurrent advanced gynecological cancer with curative and sometimes palliative intent. The procedure is associated with both high morbidity and mortality and as such is considered a highly specialist procedure. The aim of the study was to analyze surgical outcomes in women who underwent PE for advanced gynecological malignancy in a tertiary cancer referral center over 11 years.
Methods: This is an observational retrospective single-center study. There were 17 patients included who underwent PE in Hull Royal Infirmary Hospital (Hull, UK) between 2010 and 2021. The main outcome measures were the perioperative complications, overall survival (OS), and recurrence free survival (RFS). Cumulative survival rates were reported at 1, 3 and 5 years. Univariate Cox regression analysis was undertaken to analyze factors that are prognostic for OS and RFS. Hazard Ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed from the results of the Cox regression analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to visually display estimates of OS and RFS over the follow-up period.
Results: The median age at the time of surgery was 63.0 (IQR: 48.0-71.0). All patients received surgery with curative intent and complete tumor resection (R0) was achieved in 94.1% of cases. An overall 5-year survival was achieved in 63.7% of patients. Mean overall survival (OS) was 8.4 years (95% CI: 7.78-9.02). The RFS was 5.0 years (95% CI: 4.13-5.87). Both OS and RFS were significantly negatively affected by the hospital stay (P=0.020 and P=0.035, respectively), but not by the type of surgery (P=0.263 and P=0.826, respectively).
Conclusions: The results of the study demonstrated stable and comparable outcomes in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration.
背景:盆腔外扩张术(PE)是一种广泛的手术,适用于复发性晚期妇科癌症,具有治愈性,有时也有姑息性。该手术与高发病率和高死亡率相关,因此被认为是一种高度专业的手术。本研究旨在分析一家三级癌症转诊中心 11 年来接受晚期妇科恶性肿瘤 PE 的妇女的手术结果:这是一项观察性回顾性单中心研究。方法:这是一项观察性回顾性单中心研究,共纳入了 2010 年至 2021 年期间在赫尔皇家医院(英国赫尔市)接受 PE 治疗的 17 名患者。主要结果指标为围术期并发症、总生存率(OS)和无复发生存率(RFS)。报告了1年、3年和5年的累积生存率。采用单变量 Cox 回归分析来分析 OS 和 RFS 的预后因素。根据考克斯回归分析的结果计算出危险比(HR)和 95% 置信区间(95% CI)。生成卡普兰-梅耶生存曲线,直观显示随访期间OS和RFS的估计值:手术时的中位年龄为 63.0(IQR:48.0-71.0)。所有患者均接受了根治性手术,94.1%的病例实现了肿瘤完全切除(R0)。63.7%的患者获得了5年总生存期。平均总生存期(OS)为8.4年(95% CI:7.78-9.02)。RFS为5.0年(95% CI:4.13-5.87)。OS和RFS均受到住院时间的明显负面影响(分别为P=0.020和P=0.035),但不受手术类型的影响(分别为P=0.263和P=0.826):研究结果表明,接受骨盆外展术的患者的预后稳定且具有可比性。
{"title":"Pelvic exenteration: a retrospective study in a tertiary referral cancer center in the UK.","authors":"Konstantinos Palaiologos, Rebecca Karkia, Zoi Nikoloudaki, Ahmed Mohamed, Rebecca Lavelle, Susanne Booth, Marina Flynn, Christopher Helbren, Matthew Simms, Theo Giannopoulos","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05337-5","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05337-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic exenteration (PE) is an extensive surgery that is indicated in cases of recurrent advanced gynecological cancer with curative and sometimes palliative intent. The procedure is associated with both high morbidity and mortality and as such is considered a highly specialist procedure. The aim of the study was to analyze surgical outcomes in women who underwent PE for advanced gynecological malignancy in a tertiary cancer referral center over 11 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an observational retrospective single-center study. There were 17 patients included who underwent PE in Hull Royal Infirmary Hospital (Hull, UK) between 2010 and 2021. The main outcome measures were the perioperative complications, overall survival (OS), and recurrence free survival (RFS). Cumulative survival rates were reported at 1, 3 and 5 years. Univariate Cox regression analysis was undertaken to analyze factors that are prognostic for OS and RFS. Hazard Ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed from the results of the Cox regression analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to visually display estimates of OS and RFS over the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age at the time of surgery was 63.0 (IQR: 48.0-71.0). All patients received surgery with curative intent and complete tumor resection (R0) was achieved in 94.1% of cases. An overall 5-year survival was achieved in 63.7% of patients. Mean overall survival (OS) was 8.4 years (95% CI: 7.78-9.02). The RFS was 5.0 years (95% CI: 4.13-5.87). Both OS and RFS were significantly negatively affected by the hospital stay (P=0.020 and P=0.035, respectively), but not by the type of surgery (P=0.263 and P=0.826, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the study demonstrated stable and comparable outcomes in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"509-515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140294037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}