Minerva gastroenterology最新文献

Background: H. pylori is a common bacterial infection that can cause gastritis, peptic ulcers, and cancer. The distribution of H. pylori infection is not uniform and can vary based on socio-economic factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between H. pylori infection and educational status in Central Europe. If the prevalence of H. pylori infection was found to be exceptionally high in one particular educational stratum, then systematic screening in this population group could be a sensible strategy.

Methods: Participants were included from the Salzburg Colon Cancer Prevention Initiative (Sakkopi) cohort, consisting of 5313 asymptomatic Austrian patients. Clinical and laboratory parameters and the biopsy proven presence of H. pylori during an esophagoduodenoscopy were obtained, and patients' educational status was categorized into lower (38%), medium (54%), and higher (9%) education. Logistic regression models were fitted to evaluate the relationship between H. pylori infection and educational status.

Results: Compared to patients with lower educational status (21%), patients with medium (17%) and higher (15%) educational status were less often infected with H. pylori (P<0.001). This association remained after adjustment for age, sex, and concomitant diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in multivariable logistic regression models. Sensitivity analysis showed lower odds for H. pylori infection with both medium and higher education in most strata.

Conclusions: We discovered a statistically significant association between low educational status and an elevated risk for H. pylori infection. Nonetheless, the absolute difference is not enough to advocate for partially population-based screening in a specific education status group. As a result, we believe that the information linking low educational attainment to higher H. pylori prevalence should primarily be taken into account in clinical decision-making, but should not replace the existing testing approach for H. pylori, which is based on clinical reasoning and symptoms.

Background: Few studies compared lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) and standard double pigtail plastic stents (PS) for the endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). Albeit sometimes large, previously described cohorts display considerable heterogeneity and often pooled together data from several centers, involving multiple operators and techniques. Moreover, they often lack a control group for the comparison of outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare clinical efficacy and safety of PS versus LAMS for the endoscopic drainage of infected WON.

Methods: Thirty patients were enrolled between 2011 and 2017. The present study is a single-center, 1:1 case-control study. We compared patients undergoing endoscopic drainages of infected WON through LAMS (cases) or PS (controls). The primary endpoint was the clinical efficacy (resolution of the WON/sepsis), the secondary endpoint was safety (procedure-related complications).

Results: Cases and controls were homogeneous in terms of etiology and clinical characteristics: 93% of cases and 86.7% of controls were clinically successfully treated, with no significant differences in rates of postoperative infections, bleedings, and stent migrations (respectively 13.3% vs. 21.4%; P=0.65; 13.3% vs. 0%; P=0.48; 13.3% vs. 7.1%; P=1.00). No difference was shown regarding the need for additional percutaneous or surgical treatments (33.3% vs. 13.3%; P=0.39). Cases, however, displayed a significantly prolonged mean hospital stay (90.2 days vs. 18.5 days; P<0.01) and a higher mean number of endoscopic procedures per patient (4.8 vs. 1.5; P<0.01).

Conclusions: PS might be not inferior to LAMS for the treatment WONs. Further prospective RCT is needed to compare clinical efficacy and safety in the two groups.

Background: Seeing the importance of healthy diet after liver transplant (LT), our study aimed to evaluate the adherence to Mediterranean diet (MD) in a large population of LT recipients.

Methods: The present multicenter study was developed in clinically stable, liver transplanted patients, from June to September 2021. Patients completed a survey about adherence to MD, Quality of Life (QoL), sport, and employment. To analyze the correlations, we computed Pearson's coefficients; while to compare subgroups, independent samples t-tests and ANOVAs. We used a multivariable logistic regression analysis to find the predictors of impaired adherence to MD.

Results: The questionnaire was administered to 511 patients. They were males in 71% of cases with a mean age of 63.1 years (SD±10.8). LT recipients coming from central Italy displayed higher adherence to the MD (M=11.10±1.91) than patients from northern (M=9.94±2.28, P<0.001) or southern Italy (M=10.04±2.16, P<0.001). Patients from central Italy showed a significantly higher consumption of fruit, vegetables, legumes, cereals, olive oil, fish and a significantly lower intake of dairy products than patients resident in the other Italian areas. At multivariate analysis, recipients from central Italy were 3.8 times more likely to report adherence to the MD. Patients with a high physical health score were more adherent to MD, as well as patients transplanted at an earlier time.

Conclusions: We demonstrated that place of stay, time from transplant and physical dimension of QoL significantly influences the adherence to MD. Continuous information campaigns about a correct diet and lifestyle would be necessary.