Minerva cardiology and angiology最新文献

Background: Despite progress during the last decades, patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remain with a high residual risk due to multiple reasons. Optimal medical treatment (OMT) provides a decrease of recurrent ischemic events after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Therefore, treatment adherence results crucial to reduce further outcomes after the index event. No recent data are available in Argentinian population; the main objective of our study was to evaluate the adherence at 6 and 15 months in post non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NST-ACS) consecutive patients. Secondary objective was to evaluate the relationship of adherence with 15-month events.

Methods: A prespecified sub-analysis in the prospective registry Buenos Aires I was performed. The adherence was evaluated using the modified Morisky-Green Scale.

Results: A number of 872 patients had information about adherence profile. Of them 76.4% were classified as adherents at month 6 and 83.6% at 15 (P=0.06). We did not find any difference in baseline characteristic between the adherent and non-adherent patients at 6 months. The adjusted analysis showed that non-adherent patients had a rate of ischemic events at 15^th month of 20% (27/135) vs. 11.5% (52/452) in adherent patients (P=0.001). The bleeding events defined were of 3.6% in the non-adherent group vs. 5% in the adherent group without a statistical difference (P=0.238).

Conclusions: Adherence to treatment is still a major issue as almost 25% of patients should be considered as non-adherent to OMT. No clinical predictor of this phenomenon was identified but our criteria were not exhaustive. Good adherence to treatment was highly associated to a reduction of ischemic events, whereas no impact on bleeding events was found. These data support a better network and collaboration with shared decision between healthcare professionals with patients and family members to improve acceptance and adherence to optimal medical strategies.

Background: De novo diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD) is a challenging scenario in interventional cardiology with limited treatment option, beside stent implantation. In this context, a hybrid approach, combining the use of drug-eluting stent (DES) and drug-coated balloon (DCB) to treat different segments of the same lesion (e.g. long lesion and/or true bifurcation), might be an interesting and alternative strategy to limit the metal amount. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a hybrid approach in addressing percutaneous treatment of de novo diffuse CAD.

Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter study including patients affected by de novo diffuse CAD treated with a hybrid approach from April 2019 to December 2020. Angiographic and clinical data were collected. The primary endpoint was the one-year device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE, cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization [ID-TLR]). Periprocedural myocardial infarctions and periprocedural success were included among secondary endpoints.

Results: One hundred six patients were included, mean age was 68.2±10.2 years and 78.3% were male. De novo diffuse CAD consisted of 52.8% long lesions and 47.2% true bifurcation lesions. Significant increase in the final minimal lumen diameters and significant decrease in the final diameter stenosis were observed when compared to the baseline values in both DES- and DCB-target segments. Procedural success was 96.2%. DOCE at one-year was 3.7%, with all the adverse events characterized by ID-TLR.

Conclusions: Combination of DES and DCB could be a safe and effective treatment option for the treatment of de novo diffuse CAD (NCT03939468).

Background: The possible influence of chest wall conformation, as noninvasively assessed by Modified Haller Index (MHI, the ratio of chest transverse diameter over the distance between sternum and spine), on reproducibility of both left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) has never been previously investigated.

Methods: Two equal groups of healthy individuals, matched by age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors and categorized according to MHI in those with concave-shaped chest wall (MHI>2.5) and those with normal chest shape (MHI≤2.5), who underwent transthoracic echocardiography implemented with echocardiographic deformation imaging between June 2018 and May 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. LVEF and GLS were measured twice by the two echocardiographers in a double blinded manner. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), bias and limits of agreement determined with Bland-Altman analysis were calculated for repeated measurements of both LVEF and GLS.

Results: Thirty-four healthy individuals with MHI>2.5 (54.9±6.4 years, 58.8% females) and 34 matched controls with MHI≤2.5 (52.5±8.1 years, 50% females) were separately analyzed. In comparison to MHI≤2.5 group, the MHI>2.5 group was found with significantly smaller cardiac chambers and significantly lower GLS magnitude (-15.8±2.5 vs. -22.2±1.3%, P<0.001), despite similar LVEF (61.3±6.4 vs. 61.1±3.6%, P=0.87). In the MHI>2.5 group, intra-rater and inter-rater ICCs were ≤0.5 for both LVEF and LV-GLS, whereas in the MHI≤2.5 group intra-rater and inter-rater ICCs values indicated good reliability for LVEF and excellent reliability for GLS. The greatest bias and largest limits of agreement were detected for LVEF assessment (bias ranging from -1.09 to 2.94%, with the 95% limits of agreement ranging from -13.9 to 21.3%) in individuals with MHI>2.5. On the other hand, the smallest bias and narrowest limits of agreement were obtained for GLS measurement (bias ranging from -0.26 to 0.09%, with the 95% limits of agreement ranging from -1.4 to 1.4%) in participants with normal chest wall conformation (MHI≤2.5).

Conclusions: The test reliability of LVEF and GLS is strongly influenced by the chest wall conformation. MHI might represent an innovative approach for selecting the best echocardiographic method for LV systolic function estimation in the individual case.

Background: The potential influence of renin-angiotensin inhibitors on the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection has been considered in preclinical and observational studies with contradictory results. Therefore, we investigated the effect of telmisartan in reducing lung injury among hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Methods: The STAR-COVID trial was conducted as a prospective, parallel-group, randomized, open-label study involving hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19 (NCT04510662). Sixty-six patients were enrolled: 33 were assigned to the telmisartan group and 33 to the control group. The mean age of participants was 48.8 years, with 62.5% being male. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either telmisartan (40 mg daily for 14 days or until discharge) plus standard of care or standard of care alone. The primary outcome assessed was the initiation of mechanical ventilation within 14 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, the need for vasopressors, hemodialysis requirements, and length of hospital stay.

Results: Comparison between the telmisartan group and the control group revealed no significant difference in the occurrence of mechanical ventilation at 14 days (25% with telmisartan vs. 18.7% with control, P=0.579). Additionally, there were no significant differences observed in terms of mortality (25% vs. 21.9%, P=0.768), the need for vasopressors (18.8% in both groups, P=1.000), hemodialysis requirements (6.3% vs. 3.1%, P=0.500), and length of hospital stay (median of 7 days in both groups, P=0.962).

Conclusions: Compared with the standard of care, telmisartan therapy demonstrated no significant impact on respiratory failure in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19.

Background: Arterial stiffness, particularly aortic stiffness (AoS), is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Endovascular repair for abdominal (EVAR) and thoracic (TEVAR) aortic disease may increase AoS. This study protocol aims to assess changes in AoS before and after interventions for aortic disease.

Methods: Patients scheduled for EVAR or TEVAR during a three-year period will be enrolled. An indirect AoS indicator, carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) will be measured non-invasively using applanation tonometry and reported with others perioperative data before and after the endovascular treatment. Moreover, cardiological data will be collected through echocardiography.

Results: Fifty EVAR and 50 TEVAR will be enrolled. We will primarily analyze changes in cf-PWV. To ensure the reliability of our findings, we will also include supplementary data such as clinical information, morphological data, and functional echocardiographic data.

Conclusions: By examining AoS modifications before and after endovascular aortic repair, this study aims to enhance our understanding of how arterial stiffness changes following endoprosthesis deployment. The findings from the applied protocol are expected to be informative for innovative graft designs with minimized mechanical mismatch with the aortic wall and with improved vascular hemodynamic, aligning with the current trend in improving patient outcomes. Moreover, understanding these modifications is important for predicting and improving long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing such interventions.

Background: Jianxin (JX) granules is a traditional Chinese medicine widely used in the treatment of heart failure (HF), but the mechanism is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the mechanism of JX granules in the treatment of HF based on network pharmacology analysis and in-vivo experiments.

Methods: A series of network pharmacology methods was employed to ascertain potential targets and critical pathways implicated in the therapeutic action of JX granules against HF. Subsequently, molecular docking was utilized to investigate the binding affinity of key active constituents within JX granules to these targets. In-vivo experiments, echocardiography, hematoxylin and eosin, Masson's trichrome assay, and western blot analysis were conducted to validate the efficacy and mechanism of JX granules in treating rats with HF.

Results: A total of 122 active components, 896 drug targets, 1216 HF-related targets, and 136 targets pertinent to drug-disease interactions were identified. 151 key targets and 725 core clusters were detected through protein-protein interaction network analysis. Among these, interleukin 6 (IL-6), vascular endothelial growth factor a (VEGFA), and serine/threonine kinase 1 (AKT1) were core hub genes. Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis revealed the critical pathways, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and their receptors (RAGE) pathway, along with hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) signaling pathway. Molecular docking studies demonstrated high binding affinities between key targets and the pivotal active ingredients of Danshenol A, salvianolic acid B, and arachidonic acid. Furthermore, animal studies corroborated that JX granules improve cardiac function and reduce myocardial fibrosis, potentially by modulating the expression of IL-6, VEGFA, and p-AKT1.

Conclusions: The bioactive components within JX granules, such as Danshenol A, salvianolic acid B, and arachidonic acid may exert therapeutic effects on HF through modulation of IL-6, VEGFA, and AKT1 gene expression. This study provides a scientific basis for subsequent clinical application of JX granules and an in-depth investigation of their mechanisms of action.

Coronary artery bypass grafting has evolved considerably since it was introduced approximately 50 years ago, with continuously improved patient outcomes as a result of this growth. The most up-to-date evidence on topics such as graft patency, grafting strategy, approaches to graft harvesting, minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting, and postoperative pharmacotherapy may lead to changes in current accepted practice. In addition, several unanswered questions in the field of coronary artery bypass grafting may benefit from further investigation and, if resolved, might advance the field and change practice. Current or upcoming clinical trials seek to answer these unanswered questions and may generate data that yields improved outcomes and quality of life for all patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. In addition, cutting edge clinical trials designed specifically for women and racial and ethnic minorities who have had poorer outcomes and have traditionally been underrepresented in cardiovascular surgery research, have recently been launched that may change the way that a large portion of the coronary artery bypass grafting population is treated in the future.

Acute coronary syndrome is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Up to 60% of patients present with additional significant non-culprit lesions. Complete revascularization (CR) of all (culprit and non-culprit) lesions is recommended and recent randomized trials showed the benefit of performing complete multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in a single setting. Immediate CR is associated with a reduced risk of repeat myocardial infarction and unplanned ischemia driven revascularization. Furthermore, immediate CR resulted in less implanted stents, total contrast use and a shorter duration of hospitalization while maintaining a similar success rate of complete revascularization. Further studies need to evaluate the role of coronary physiology and intravascular imaging for enhanced understanding of the pathophysiology of early events in non-culprit lesions.

Clinical experience and several large studies in the field have found that SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause long-term persistent cardiovascular (CV) impairment beyond the acute phase of the disease. This has resulted in a major public health concern worldwide. Regarding COVID-related long-term involvement of various organs and systems, using specific definitions and terminology is crucial to point out time relationships, lingering damage, and outcome, mostly when symptoms and signs of CV disease persist beyond the acute phase. Due to a lack of a common standardized definition, investigators have used interchangeable terms such as "long COVID," "post-COVID," or "post-acute sequelae of COVID-19" to describe CV involvement, thus causing some confusion. For the sake of clarity, the aim of this paper is to discuss the definition and terminology used in defining sequelae after the acute phase of COVID-19, thus pointing out the meaning of definitions like acute cardiac injury, post-acute sequelae of COVID-19, long COVID syndrome, and increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.