首页 > 最新文献

Rethinking Islam in Europe最新文献

英文 中文
Between Certainty and Contingency: On the Way to a New Understanding of Islamic Theology and Religious Education in the European Context 在确定性与偶然性之间:重新认识欧洲背景下的伊斯兰神学与宗教教育
Pub Date : 2022-01-19 DOI: 10.1515/9783110752410-007
{"title":"Between Certainty and Contingency: On the Way to a New Understanding of Islamic Theology and Religious Education in the European Context","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110752410-007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110752410-007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":188523,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Islam in Europe","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114951849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Frontmatter
Pub Date : 2022-01-19 DOI: 10.1515/9783110752410-fm
{"title":"Frontmatter","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110752410-fm","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110752410-fm","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":188523,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Islam in Europe","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115571039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Islamic Theology in European Universities 欧洲大学的伊斯兰神学
Pub Date : 2022-01-19 DOI: 10.1515/9783110752410-003
The Muslim presence in Europe has a long and ambivalent history, which differs from country to country. Every European country has its own history of encounter with Islam that is shaped by its own context. That is why different models and traditions have developed within the European countries for interacting with Islam, which means that, given the various approaches and practices in individual countries, it is impossible to speak of a pan-European outlook. Despite the different historically conditioned approaches of individual European countries to Islam, the developments in the 1960s and 1970s, when increased Muslim workers were recruited, showed similarities across borders. An oft-recurring assumption in the European context concerning the Muslim ‘guest worker’ is manifest in the expectation that the new arrivals would only be in Europe for a limited time and would then return to their home countries. Not only did the host countries – which recruited these people for economic reasons – think this would be the case, but the guest workers themselves, who had come for the same reasons, thought so as well. That is why nothing much was done to integrate the new workers into society. The new workers were not expected to adjust to society, nor did the governments initiate the process of naturalisation. As would be emphasised later, it was a serious oversight, for things turned out quite differently than was first expected. The guest workers stayed longer and brought their families over from their native countries, which meant that, in distinction from their previous isolated lives, they were forced to some extent by the influx of their families to actively participate in public life. These developments revealed the omissions of the preceding years. It also became clear that the former guest workers and their family members had in the meantime become an integral part of society. But there were no models for integration that could correct the omissions and make the integration of the migrants into society easier. The gradual change in the profile of the former guest workers, who had in the meantime become residents and whose children attended local schools, led to the first tentative steps towards integration. These initial considerations on integration first focused almost exclusively on learning German because inadequate knowledge of the language represented a major obstacle to communication that had in the meantime become unavoidable. The religious needs of Muslims, however, played no significant role, even though the debates on integration had greatly increased in the meantime.
穆斯林在欧洲的存在有一段漫长而矛盾的历史,这段历史因国而异。每个欧洲国家都有自己与伊斯兰相遇的历史,这是由其自身的背景所塑造的。这就是为什么在欧洲各国内部发展了不同的模式和传统来与伊斯兰教互动,这意味着,鉴于个别国家的各种方法和做法,不可能谈论泛欧前景。尽管个别欧洲国家对待伊斯兰教的历史方式不同,但在20世纪60年代和70年代,当越来越多的穆斯林工人被招募时,各国的发展表现出相似之处。在欧洲背景下,关于穆斯林“客工”的一个经常出现的假设是,新到达的人只会在欧洲呆一段有限的时间,然后就会返回他们的祖国。不仅是出于经济原因而雇用这些人的东道国认为情况会是这样,就连出于同样原因而来的外来工自己也这么认为。这就是为什么没有采取任何措施让新工人融入社会。新工人不需要适应社会,政府也没有启动入籍程序。正如后来所强调的那样,这是一个严重的疏忽,因为事情的结果与最初的预期大不相同。外来工人逗留的时间更长,并把他们的家人从本国带过来,这意味着,与他们以前的孤立生活不同,他们在一定程度上由于家人的涌入而被迫积极参与公共生活。这些事态发展揭示了前几年的疏忽。同样清楚的是,以前的外来工人和他们的家庭成员在此期间已成为社会不可分割的一部分。但是,没有一种融合模式可以纠正这些遗漏,使移民更容易融入社会。在此期间,以前的外来工人已经成为当地居民,他们的孩子在当地学校上学,他们的形象逐渐发生了变化,这导致了融合的第一步试探性的步骤。这些关于融合的最初考虑首先几乎完全集中在学习德语上,因为语言知识不足是交流的一个主要障碍,与此同时,这种障碍已经变得不可避免。然而,穆斯林的宗教需要并没有发挥重要作用,尽管与此同时关于融合的辩论大大增加了。
{"title":"Islamic Theology in European Universities","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110752410-003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110752410-003","url":null,"abstract":"The Muslim presence in Europe has a long and ambivalent history, which differs from country to country. Every European country has its own history of encounter with Islam that is shaped by its own context. That is why different models and traditions have developed within the European countries for interacting with Islam, which means that, given the various approaches and practices in individual countries, it is impossible to speak of a pan-European outlook. Despite the different historically conditioned approaches of individual European countries to Islam, the developments in the 1960s and 1970s, when increased Muslim workers were recruited, showed similarities across borders. An oft-recurring assumption in the European context concerning the Muslim ‘guest worker’ is manifest in the expectation that the new arrivals would only be in Europe for a limited time and would then return to their home countries. Not only did the host countries – which recruited these people for economic reasons – think this would be the case, but the guest workers themselves, who had come for the same reasons, thought so as well. That is why nothing much was done to integrate the new workers into society. The new workers were not expected to adjust to society, nor did the governments initiate the process of naturalisation. As would be emphasised later, it was a serious oversight, for things turned out quite differently than was first expected. The guest workers stayed longer and brought their families over from their native countries, which meant that, in distinction from their previous isolated lives, they were forced to some extent by the influx of their families to actively participate in public life. These developments revealed the omissions of the preceding years. It also became clear that the former guest workers and their family members had in the meantime become an integral part of society. But there were no models for integration that could correct the omissions and make the integration of the migrants into society easier. The gradual change in the profile of the former guest workers, who had in the meantime become residents and whose children attended local schools, led to the first tentative steps towards integration. These initial considerations on integration first focused almost exclusively on learning German because inadequate knowledge of the language represented a major obstacle to communication that had in the meantime become unavoidable. The religious needs of Muslims, however, played no significant role, even though the debates on integration had greatly increased in the meantime.","PeriodicalId":188523,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Islam in Europe","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123368007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In the Midst of Ambivalences in Islam 在伊斯兰教的矛盾中
Pub Date : 2022-01-19 DOI: 10.1515/9783110752410-004
{"title":"In the Midst of Ambivalences in Islam","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110752410-004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110752410-004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":188523,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Islam in Europe","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132076448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Jesus Christ in the Perspective of Islam 伊斯兰教视角下的耶稣基督
Pub Date : 2022-01-19 DOI: 10.1515/9783110752410-013
{"title":"Jesus Christ in the Perspective of Islam","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110752410-013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110752410-013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":188523,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Islam in Europe","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133595300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interreligious Dialogue from a Muslim Perspective 从穆斯林的角度看宗教间对话
Pub Date : 2022-01-19 DOI: 10.1515/9783110752410-011
Since the 1960s, Europe has experienced an increasing plurality of cultures and religions. In addition to entailing an enormous enrichment for society, this plurality has also presented a challenge for it as a whole. To use the opportunities offered by this cultural and religious plurality, there is, among other things, the necessity to confront the different cultures and religions and their varying – and to some extent contradictory – values and customs and to ‘integrate’ them into a community. This is not an easy undertaking because in addition to a recognition in principle and promotion of pluralism, common and binding basic values are also needed to be able to maintain a democratic and pluralist society (Sejdini, 2015c, 11– 17). In connection with this, religions are also challenged to contribute to a culture of the peaceful co-existence of various worldviews. Especially in times in which human life can be eliminated in the name of God, there is a need to counteract the latent suspicion that, because of their absolute truth claims and intolerance towards those of other faiths, monotheistic religions stand in the way of a pluralist society encompassing various worldviews (Assmann, 1998). Here such monocausal explanations of the phenomenon of violence mask the fact that religions are not “hermeneutically sealed off ... inner spaces” (Schmid, 2008) but are influenced by political, economic, cultural, and social factors. Therefore, such factors must also be kept in mind in interreligious dialogue so that it can yield results. In full awareness of the complex structure and ambivalent character of the phrase ‘interreligious dialogue’, this essay presents a Muslim perspective that is based of course on my Islamic theology and work in pedagogics. Accordingly, the decision to use the term ‘Muslim’ instead of ‘Islamic’ is programmatic for my subject-oriented and contextual approach. This assumes that it is not religions as monolithic blocks that engage in direct dialogue but people who live in a certain context. Moreover, the subject-oriented approach is also even supported by the religious sources, which, in relation to interreligious dialogue, contain partly even apparently contradictory statements that people articulate (Abu-Zaid, 2008). Following Radtke, it can be said that, in addition to cultures, religions do not speak either, even if some explain themselves to their speakers (Radtke, 2011). In connection with this, the fundamental tendencies in the Qur’an, the
自20世纪60年代以来,欧洲经历了文化和宗教的日益多元化。除了给社会带来巨大的财富之外,这种多元化也给整个社会带来了挑战。为了利用这种文化和宗教多元性所提供的机会,除其他事项外,有必要面对不同的文化和宗教及其不同的-在某种程度上是相互矛盾的-价值观和习俗,并将它们“整合”到一个社区中。这不是一件容易的事情,因为除了在原则上承认和促进多元化之外,还需要共同和具有约束力的基本价值观来维持民主和多元化的社会(Sejdini, 2015c, 11 - 17)。在这方面,宗教也受到挑战,要为各种世界观和平共处的文化作出贡献。特别是在可以以上帝的名义消灭人类生命的时代,有必要消除潜在的怀疑,即一神论宗教由于其绝对真理的主张和对其他信仰的不容忍,阻碍了包含各种世界观的多元社会(Assmann, 1998年)。在这里,这种对暴力现象的单因果解释掩盖了这样一个事实,即宗教并非“在解释学上被封闭……内部空间”(Schmid, 2008),但受到政治、经济、文化和社会因素的影响。因此,在宗教间对话中也必须考虑到这些因素,以便产生结果。在充分意识到“宗教间对话”这个短语的复杂结构和矛盾特征的情况下,这篇文章提出了一个穆斯林的观点,当然这是基于我的伊斯兰神学和教育学的工作。因此,决定使用“穆斯林”而不是“伊斯兰”一词,是我以主题为导向和上下文方法的程序性决定。这假设不是宗教作为铁板一块进行直接对话,而是生活在特定环境中的人们。此外,以主体为导向的方法甚至也得到了宗教来源的支持,这些来源与宗教间对话有关,包含了人们阐明的部分甚至明显矛盾的陈述(Abu-Zaid, 2008)。根据Radtke,可以说,除了文化,宗教也不说话,即使有些向他们的演讲者解释自己(Radtke, 2011)。与此相关,《古兰经》的基本倾向是
{"title":"Interreligious Dialogue from a Muslim Perspective","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110752410-011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110752410-011","url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1960s, Europe has experienced an increasing plurality of cultures and religions. In addition to entailing an enormous enrichment for society, this plurality has also presented a challenge for it as a whole. To use the opportunities offered by this cultural and religious plurality, there is, among other things, the necessity to confront the different cultures and religions and their varying – and to some extent contradictory – values and customs and to ‘integrate’ them into a community. This is not an easy undertaking because in addition to a recognition in principle and promotion of pluralism, common and binding basic values are also needed to be able to maintain a democratic and pluralist society (Sejdini, 2015c, 11– 17). In connection with this, religions are also challenged to contribute to a culture of the peaceful co-existence of various worldviews. Especially in times in which human life can be eliminated in the name of God, there is a need to counteract the latent suspicion that, because of their absolute truth claims and intolerance towards those of other faiths, monotheistic religions stand in the way of a pluralist society encompassing various worldviews (Assmann, 1998). Here such monocausal explanations of the phenomenon of violence mask the fact that religions are not “hermeneutically sealed off ... inner spaces” (Schmid, 2008) but are influenced by political, economic, cultural, and social factors. Therefore, such factors must also be kept in mind in interreligious dialogue so that it can yield results. In full awareness of the complex structure and ambivalent character of the phrase ‘interreligious dialogue’, this essay presents a Muslim perspective that is based of course on my Islamic theology and work in pedagogics. Accordingly, the decision to use the term ‘Muslim’ instead of ‘Islamic’ is programmatic for my subject-oriented and contextual approach. This assumes that it is not religions as monolithic blocks that engage in direct dialogue but people who live in a certain context. Moreover, the subject-oriented approach is also even supported by the religious sources, which, in relation to interreligious dialogue, contain partly even apparently contradictory statements that people articulate (Abu-Zaid, 2008). Following Radtke, it can be said that, in addition to cultures, religions do not speak either, even if some explain themselves to their speakers (Radtke, 2011). In connection with this, the fundamental tendencies in the Qur’an, the","PeriodicalId":188523,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Islam in Europe","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128322525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Secular and Religious: Challenges for Islamic Theology 世俗与宗教:对伊斯兰神学的挑战
Pub Date : 2022-01-19 DOI: 10.1515/9783110752410-015
To discuss the theme ‘secular and religious’ from a theological perspective is certainly not an easy undertaking. This is due, on the one hand, to the fact that the theme is a very complex one and, on the other, to the fact that the concepts ‘secular’ and ‘religious’ are often used in opposition to each other. The issue becomes even more explosive when it is discussed in the context of Islam. Moreover, some additional challenges become apparent that are conditioned partly historically but also partly by the contemporary debates on Islam. In particular, the metatheme of the compatibility of Islam with Western values plays a crucial role and has determined the direction of public debates for years. Even if the discussions – with some exceptions – are conducted too emotionally, unreflectively, and one-dimensionally, current developments in Europe leave no doubt about the urgency of a substantial debate on this theme. To be able to approach this thematic complex better, we will first discuss a few central aspects. It seems appropriate, first, to point out that the Islamic theological approach to secularism is embedded in a wide historical framework and can only be understood against that background. The encounter of Muslims with secularism cannot and should not be viewed in an isolated way. Rather, it is part of a series of events that Muslims have been confronted with in the wake of the decline in power of the ‘Islamic empire’. The relation of the ‘Muslim world’ to secularism was stamped in a lasting and decisive way by the circumstances of this encounter, which did not happen everywhere at the same time. And subsequent developments – like the colonisation of Muslim areas, attempts at institutional and social reform in line with the Western model, abolishing the caliphate and the installation of authoritarian regimes controlled from abroad, secularism interpreted and implemented in its most repressive forms – reinforced this. Obviously, this also influenced Islamic theology. This other history or experience of Islam with secularism, which is different from the European experience, must always be kept in mind when discussing the Islamic approach to this theme. The second aspect, which should be discussed briefly at the outset, concerns the different variations of the concept of ‘secularism’. This ambiguity often leads to misunderstanding and confusion, which – apart from any analysis of the content – can end in a sweeping rejection of secularism. That is why I should point out here that this essay focuses more on constitutional secularism. Thus, here
从神学的角度来讨论“世俗与宗教”这个主题当然不是一件容易的事。这一方面是由于主题非常复杂,另一方面是由于“世俗”和“宗教”这两个概念经常被对立地使用。当把这个问题放在伊斯兰教的背景下讨论时,它变得更加具有爆炸性。此外,一些额外的挑战变得明显,这些挑战部分是由历史决定的,部分是由当代关于伊斯兰教的辩论决定的。特别是,伊斯兰教与西方价值观的兼容性这一元主题起着至关重要的作用,多年来一直决定着公共辩论的方向。即使这些讨论(除了一些例外)过于情绪化、缺乏反思和片面,但欧洲目前的事态发展无疑表明,就这一主题展开实质性辩论的紧迫性。为了更好地理解这个主题综合体,我们将首先讨论几个中心方面。首先,似乎有必要指出,伊斯兰神学对世俗主义的态度根植于一个广泛的历史框架中,只有在这个背景下才能理解。穆斯林与世俗主义的相遇不能也不应该被孤立地看待。更确切地说,这是穆斯林在“伊斯兰帝国”权力衰落之后所面临的一系列事件的一部分。“穆斯林世界”与世俗主义的关系,在这次相遇的环境中烙上了持久而决定性的印记,而这种相遇并不是同时发生在所有地方。随后的事态发展——比如穆斯林地区的殖民化,按照西方模式进行制度和社会改革的尝试,废除哈里发政权,建立受国外控制的独裁政权,以最具压迫性的形式解释和实施世俗主义——加强了这一点。显然,这也影响了伊斯兰神学。在讨论伊斯兰教对这一主题的态度时,必须始终牢记伊斯兰教与世俗主义的其他历史或经验,这与欧洲的经验不同。第二个方面,应该在一开始就简要讨论,涉及“世俗主义”概念的不同变体。这种模棱两可常常导致误解和混淆,而不考虑对内容的任何分析,这种误解和混淆最终可能导致对世俗主义的全面排斥。这就是为什么我应该在这里指出,这篇文章更多地关注宪法世俗主义。因此,在这里
{"title":"Secular and Religious: Challenges for Islamic Theology","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110752410-015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110752410-015","url":null,"abstract":"To discuss the theme ‘secular and religious’ from a theological perspective is certainly not an easy undertaking. This is due, on the one hand, to the fact that the theme is a very complex one and, on the other, to the fact that the concepts ‘secular’ and ‘religious’ are often used in opposition to each other. The issue becomes even more explosive when it is discussed in the context of Islam. Moreover, some additional challenges become apparent that are conditioned partly historically but also partly by the contemporary debates on Islam. In particular, the metatheme of the compatibility of Islam with Western values plays a crucial role and has determined the direction of public debates for years. Even if the discussions – with some exceptions – are conducted too emotionally, unreflectively, and one-dimensionally, current developments in Europe leave no doubt about the urgency of a substantial debate on this theme. To be able to approach this thematic complex better, we will first discuss a few central aspects. It seems appropriate, first, to point out that the Islamic theological approach to secularism is embedded in a wide historical framework and can only be understood against that background. The encounter of Muslims with secularism cannot and should not be viewed in an isolated way. Rather, it is part of a series of events that Muslims have been confronted with in the wake of the decline in power of the ‘Islamic empire’. The relation of the ‘Muslim world’ to secularism was stamped in a lasting and decisive way by the circumstances of this encounter, which did not happen everywhere at the same time. And subsequent developments – like the colonisation of Muslim areas, attempts at institutional and social reform in line with the Western model, abolishing the caliphate and the installation of authoritarian regimes controlled from abroad, secularism interpreted and implemented in its most repressive forms – reinforced this. Obviously, this also influenced Islamic theology. This other history or experience of Islam with secularism, which is different from the European experience, must always be kept in mind when discussing the Islamic approach to this theme. The second aspect, which should be discussed briefly at the outset, concerns the different variations of the concept of ‘secularism’. This ambiguity often leads to misunderstanding and confusion, which – apart from any analysis of the content – can end in a sweeping rejection of secularism. That is why I should point out here that this essay focuses more on constitutional secularism. Thus, here","PeriodicalId":188523,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Islam in Europe","volume":"209 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127969192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Foundations of Interreligious Learning from an Islamic Perspective 从伊斯兰的角度看宗教间学习的基础
Pub Date : 2022-01-19 DOI: 10.1515/9783110752410-012
{"title":"Foundations of Interreligious Learning from an Islamic Perspective","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110752410-012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110752410-012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":188523,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Islam in Europe","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127572977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Religious Plurality from the Perspective of Islamic Religious Education 从伊斯兰宗教教育看宗教多元性
Pub Date : 2022-01-19 DOI: 10.1515/9783110752410-010
The complexity and multifaceted character of creation could lead us to expect that people – an important part of this creation – see plurality as an enrichment. Nevertheless, contrary to this well-intended assumption, reality often looks quite different. For various reasons, plurality – particularly in its religious and worldview manifestation – is viewed increasingly as an artificially induced situation that is owed to a wrongly understood tolerance, a situation that threatens one’s own cultural and religious identity and therefore must be overcome. One can see how non-intuitive a respectful approach to plurality or religious and worldview diversity is can also be seen in the fact that it is also being increasingly rejected in liberal democratic society. This again indicates that an attitude that guarantees a peaceful and respectful co-existence in a pluralist society can only be appropriated through reflection and self-control and must then be constantly put into practice. An essential role in the shaping of a respective attitude to plurality naturally belongs to religions, which are instructed to encounter the growing religious and worldview diversity in our society with new and theologically grounded approaches. In contrast to the apologetic assertion that religions as such are pluralist in themselves, one can say that
创造的复杂性和多面性可能使我们期望人类——创造的重要组成部分——将多元化视为一种丰富。然而,与这种善意的假设相反,现实往往看起来完全不同。由于各种原因,多元化- -特别是其宗教和世界观的表现形式- -越来越被视为一种人为造成的情况,这种情况是由于对宽容的错误理解造成的,这种情况威胁到一个人自己的文化和宗教特性,因此必须加以克服。我们可以看到,尊重多元化或宗教和世界观多样性的方法是多么不直观,这也可以从自由民主社会中越来越多地被拒绝的事实中看出。这再次表明,一种保证在多元社会中和平与尊重共存的态度只能通过反思和自我控制加以利用,然后必须不断付诸实践。在形成各自对多元化的态度方面,宗教自然发挥着重要作用,它们被指示以新的和基于神学的方法来应对我们社会中日益增长的宗教和世界观多样性。与宗教本身是多元主义的辩解相反,我们可以说
{"title":"Religious Plurality from the Perspective of Islamic Religious Education","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110752410-010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110752410-010","url":null,"abstract":"The complexity and multifaceted character of creation could lead us to expect that people – an important part of this creation – see plurality as an enrichment. Nevertheless, contrary to this well-intended assumption, reality often looks quite different. For various reasons, plurality – particularly in its religious and worldview manifestation – is viewed increasingly as an artificially induced situation that is owed to a wrongly understood tolerance, a situation that threatens one’s own cultural and religious identity and therefore must be overcome. One can see how non-intuitive a respectful approach to plurality or religious and worldview diversity is can also be seen in the fact that it is also being increasingly rejected in liberal democratic society. This again indicates that an attitude that guarantees a peaceful and respectful co-existence in a pluralist society can only be appropriated through reflection and self-control and must then be constantly put into practice. An essential role in the shaping of a respective attitude to plurality naturally belongs to religions, which are instructed to encounter the growing religious and worldview diversity in our society with new and theologically grounded approaches. In contrast to the apologetic assertion that religions as such are pluralist in themselves, one can say that","PeriodicalId":188523,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Islam in Europe","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134382655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Islam as Part of European Society 伊斯兰教是欧洲社会的一部分
Pub Date : 2022-01-19 DOI: 10.1515/9783110752410-002
both parties integrated masses of newly enfranchised voters into existing liberal parliamen-tary regimes, and both were deradicalized in the process, becoming part of the very insti-tutions they initially rejected. … [D]emocracy in Europe was often expanded and consolidat-ed by its enemies. This lesson should not be lost, especially among those studying the challenges facing democratic transition and consolidation in the contemporary world. (Ka-lyvas, 1996, 264)
两党都将大量新获得选举权的选民纳入了现有的自由议会制度,在这一过程中,两党都变得非激进化,成为他们最初拒绝的机构的一部分。[D]欧洲的民主经常被敌人扩大和巩固。这一教训不应被遗忘,尤其是那些研究当代世界民主转型和巩固所面临挑战的人。(Ka-lyvas, 1996, 264)
{"title":"Islam as Part of European Society","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110752410-002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110752410-002","url":null,"abstract":"both parties integrated masses of newly enfranchised voters into existing liberal parliamen-tary regimes, and both were deradicalized in the process, becoming part of the very insti-tutions they initially rejected. … [D]emocracy in Europe was often expanded and consolidat-ed by its enemies. This lesson should not be lost, especially among those studying the challenges facing democratic transition and consolidation in the contemporary world. (Ka-lyvas, 1996, 264)","PeriodicalId":188523,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Islam in Europe","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129025812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Rethinking Islam in Europe
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1