Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation最新文献

Background: This paper compares the most recent data on the incidence and prevalence of kidney replacement therapy (KRT), kidney transplantation rates, and mortality on KRT from Europe to those from the United States (US), including comparisons of treatment modalities (haemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and kidney transplantation (KTx)).

Methods: Data were derived from the annual reports of the European Renal Association (ERA) Registry and the United States Renal Data System (USRDS). The European data include information from national and regional renal registries providing the ERA Registry with individual patient data. Additional analyses were performed to present results for all participating European countries together.

Results: In 2021, the KRT incidence in the US (409.7 per million population (pmp)) was almost 3-fold higher than in Europe (144.4 pmp). Despite the substantial difference in KRT incidence, approximately the same proportion of patients initiated HD (Europe: 82%, US: 84%), PD (14%; 13%, respectively), or underwent pre-emptive KTx (4%; 3%, respectively). The KRT prevalence in the US (2436.1 pmp) was 2-fold higher than in Europe (1187.8 pmp). Within Europe, approximately half of all prevalent patients were living with a functioning graft (47%), while in the US, this was one third (32%). The number of kidney transplantations performed was almost twice as high in the US (77.0 pmp) compared to Europe (41.6 pmp). The mortality of patients receiving KRT was 1.6-fold higher in the US (157.3 per 1000 patient years) compared to Europe (98.7 per 1000 patient years).

Conclusions: The US had a much higher KRT incidence, prevalence, and mortality compared to Europe, and despite a higher kidney transplantation rate, a lower proportion of prevalent patients with a functioning graft.

Background: Access to kidney transplantation (KT) remains challenging for patients with end-stage kidney disease. This study assessed women's access to KT in France by considering comorbidities and neighbourhood social deprivation.

Methods: All incident patients 18-85 years old starting dialysis in France between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2019 were included. Three outcomes were assessed: access to the KT waiting list after dialysis start, KT access after waitlisting and KT access after dialysis start. Cox and Fine-Gray models were used. Gender-European Deprivation Index and gender-age interactions were tested and analyses were performed among strata if required.

Results: A total of 29 395 patients were included (35% of women). After adjusting for social deprivation and comorbidities, women were less likely to be waitlisted at 1 year {adjusted hazard ratio [adjHR] 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-0.96]} and 3 years [adjHR 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.91)] after dialysis initiation. This disparity concerned mainly women ≥60 years of age [adjHR 0.76 (95% CI 0.71-0.82) at 1 year and 0.75 (0.71-0.81) at 3 years]. Access to KT after 2 years of waitlisting was similar between genders. Access to KT was similar between genders at 3 years after dialysis start but decreased for women after 4 years [adjHR 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.99)] and longer [adjHR 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.96)] follow-up.

Conclusions: In France, women are less likely to be waitlisted and undergo KT. This is driven by the ≥60-year-old group and is not explained by comorbidities or social deprivation level.

Intrauterine development is crucial for life-long health; therefore, elucidation of its key regulators is of interest for their potential prognostic and therapeutic implications. Originally described as a membrane-bound anti-aging protein, Klotho has evolved as a regulator of numerous functions in different organ systems. Circulating Klotho is generated by alternative splicing or active shedding from cell membranes. Recently, Klotho was identified as a regulator of placental function, and while Klotho does not cross the placental barrier, increased levels of circulating α-Klotho have been identified in umbilical cord blood compared with maternal blood, indicating that Klotho may also play a role in intrauterine development. In this narrative review, we discuss novel insights into the specific functions of the Klotho proteins in the placenta and in intrauterine development, while summarizing up-to-date knowledge about their structures and functions. Klotho plays a role in stem cell functioning, organogenesis and haematopoiesis. Low circulating maternal and foetal levels of Klotho are associated with preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and an increased perinatal risk for newborns, indicating a potential use of Klotho as biomarker and therapeutic target. Experimental administration of Klotho protein indicates a neuro- and nephroprotective potential, suggesting a possible future role of Klotho as a therapeutic agent. However, the use of Klotho as intervention during pregnancy is as yet unproven. Here, we summarize novel evidence, suggesting Klotho as a key regulator for healthy pregnancies and intrauterine development with promising potential for clinical use.

Background and hypothesis: Patients with minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) usually experienced severe edema which can affect the absorption of oral corticosteroid during the first 2 weeks. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of intravenous isovalent methylprednisolone induction followed by oral prednisone therapy with conventional oral prednisone therapy in highly edematous MCNS patients, aiming to provide a better therapy for MCNS patients.

Methods: A single-center, open-label, parallel-arm randomized controlled trial was performed in the Nephrology Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University. Patients who met the inclusion were enrolled in our study from May 2015 to October 2020, and were randomized to receive conventional oral steroid or 2 weeks intravenous methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone.

Results: 117 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the sequential group (N = 57) or the oral group (N = 60). Total remission rate in the sequential group was higher than the oral group after treatment for 2 weeks and 4 weeks (P = 0.032, P = 0.027). Complete remission rate was higher in the sequential group than in the oral group (63.3% vs. 41.5%, P = 0.031) after treatment for 2 weeks. The time to achieve CR is shorter in the sequential group than the oral group, with a statistically significant difference (14.0 days, 95% CI [13.5 to 14.5] vs. 16.0 days, 95% CI [12.7 to 19.3], P = 0.024). There were no significant difference in relapse rate (24.5% vs 28.3%, P = 0.823) and time to relapse (155 ± 103 days vs 150.7 ± 103.7 days, P = 0.916) between two groups.

Conclusion: This study suggested that highly edematous MCNS patients received intravenously isovalent methylprednisolone induction therapy follow by oral prednisone achieved earlier remission than the conventional oral prednisone regimen without differences in relapse rates or adverse effects. Short-term intravenous methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone may be a better choice for MCNS patients with highly edema.

Background: Clinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are scarce and inconclusive in patients who are receiving dialysis, for whom DOAC are not labelled in Europe. In a French nationwide registry study of patients on chronic dialysis, we compared the effectiveness and safety of off-label DOAC use vs approved vitamin K antagonist (VKA).

Methods: Data on patients on dialysis were extracted from the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry and merged with data from the French national healthcare system database (Système National des Données de Santé, SNDS). Patients on dialysis who had initiated treatment with an oral anticoagulant between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2020, were eligible for inclusion. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of major bleeding events and the primary effectiveness outcome was the occurrence of thrombotic events. Using propensity score-weighted cause-specific Cox regression, we compared the safety and effectiveness outcomes for DOAC and VKA.

Results: A total of 8954 patients received an oral anticoagulant (483 DOAC and 8471 VKA) for the first time after the initiation of dialysis. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up period of 1.7 (0.8-3.2) years, 2567 patients presented a first thromboembolic event and 1254 patients had a bleeding event. After propensity score adjustment, the risk of a thromboembolic event was significantly lower in patients treated with a DOAC than in patients treated with a VKA {weighted hazard ratio (wHR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.66 (0.46; 0.94)}. A non-significant trend toward a lower risk of major bleeding events was found in DOAC-treated patients, relative to VKA-treated patients [wHR (95% CI) 0.68 (0.41; 1.12)]. The results were consistent across subgroups and in sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: In a large group of dialysis patients initiating an oral anticoagulant, the off-label use of DOACs was associated with a significantly lower risk of thromboembolic events and a non-significantly lower risk of bleeding, relative to VKA use. This provides reassurance regarding the off-label use of DOACs in people on dialysis.

Background: Immunoglobulin A (IgA) vasculitis nephritis (IgAVN) is the most common secondary IgA nephropathy (IgAN). Urinary C4d have been identified associated with the development and progression in primary IgAN; however, its role in kidney disease progression of IgAVN is still unclear.

Methods: This study enrolled 139 patients with IgAVN, 18 healthy subjects, 23 focal segmental glomerulosclerosis patients and 38 IgAN patients. Urinary C4d levels at kidney biopsy were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The association between urinary C4d/creatinine and kidney disease progression event, defined as 40% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline or end-stage kidney disease, was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and restricted cubic splines.

Results: The levels of urinary C4d/creatinine (Cr) in IgAVN and IgAN patients were higher than in healthy controls. Higher levels of urinary C4d/Cr were associated with higher proteinuria and severe Oxford C lesions, and glomerular C4d deposition. After a median follow-up of 52.79 months, 18 (12.95%) participants reached composite kidney disease progression event. The risk of kidney disease progression event was higher with higher levels of Ln(urinary C4d/Cr). After adjustment for clinical data, higher levels of urinary C4d/Cr were associated with kidney disease progression in IgAVN [per Ln-transformed urinary C4d/Cr, hazard ratio 1.573, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.101-2.245; P = .013]. Compared with the lower C4d/Cr group, the hazard ratio was 5.539 (95% CI 1.135-27.035; P = .034) for the higher levels group.

Conclusions: Higher levels of urinary C4d/Cr were associated with kidney disease progression event in patients with IgAVN.

Background and hypothesis: Evidence on the role of smoking in the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has mostly relied on self-reported smoking status. We aimed to compare the associations of smoking status as assessed by self-reports and urine cotinine with CKD risk.

Methods: Using the PREVEND prospective study, smoking status was assessed at baseline using self-reports and urine cotinine in 4333 participants (mean age, 52 years) without a history of CKD at baseline. Participants were classified as never, former, light current, and heavy current smokers according to self-reports and comparable cutoffs for urine cotinine. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for CKD.

Results: The percentages of self-reported and cotinine-assessed current smokers were 27.5% and 24.0%, respectively. During a median follow-up of 7.0 years, 593 cases of CKD were recorded. In analyses adjusted for established risk factors, the HRs (95% CI) of CKD for self-reported former, light current, and heavy current smokers compared with never smokers were 1.17 (0.95-1.44), 1.48 (1.10-2.00), and 1.48 (1.14-1.93), respectively. On further adjustment for urinary albumin excretion (UAE), the HRs (95% CI) were 1.07 (0.87-1.32), 1.26 (0.93-1.70), and 1.20 (0.93-1.57), respectively. For urine cotinine-assessed smoking status, the corresponding HRs (95% CI) were 0.81 (0.52-1.25), 1.17 (0.92-1.49), and 1.32 (1.02-1.71), respectively, in analyses adjusted for established risk factors plus UAE.

Conclusion: Self-reported current smoking is associated with increased CKD risk, but dependent on UAE. The association between urine cotinine-assessed current smoking and increased CKD risk is independent of UAE. Urine cotinine-assessed smoking status may be a more reliable risk indicator for CKD incidence than self-reported smoking status.

Background: The population with kidney failure is at increased risk of cancer and associated mortality. Relative survival can provide insight into the excess mortality, directly or indirectly, attributed to cancer in the population with kidney failure.

Methods: We estimated relative survival for people all ages receiving dialysis (n = 4089) and kidney transplant recipients (n = 3253) with de novo cancer, and for the general population with cancer in Australia and New Zealand (n = 3 043 166) over the years 1980-2019. The entire general population was the reference group for background mortality, adjusted for sex, age, calendar year and country. We used Poisson regression to quantify excess mortality ratios.

Results: Five-year relative survival for all-site cancer was markedly lower than that for the general population for people receiving dialysis [0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23-0.26] and kidney transplant recipients (0.55, 95% CI 0.53-0.57). In dialysis, excess mortality was more than double (2.16, 95% CI 2.08-2.25) that of the general population with cancer and for kidney transplant recipients 1.34 times higher (95% CI 1.27-2.41). There was no difference in excess mortality from lung cancer between people with kidney failure and the general population with cancer. Comparatively, there was a significant survival deficit for people with kidney failure, compared with the general population with cancer, for melanoma, breast cancer and prostate cancers.

Conclusion: Decreased cancer survival in kidney failure may reflect differences in multi-morbidity burden, reduced access to treatment, or greater harm from or reduced efficacy of treatments. Our findings support research aimed at investigating these hypotheses.