Each paper needs an abstract of up to 250 words. It should be structured as follows: Background/Aims: What is the major problem that prompted the study? Methods: How was the study carried out? Results: Most important findings? Conclusion: Most important conclusion? Abstracts of Minireviews: Should be divided into the following subsections: Background, Summary and Key Messages. The Background should provide a brief clinical context for the review and is followed by the Summary, which should include a concise description of the main topics covered in the text. The Key Messages encapsulate the main conclusions of the review.s of Minireviews: Should be divided into the following subsections: Background, Summary and Key Messages. The Background should provide a brief clinical context for the review and is followed by the Summary, which should include a concise description of the main topics covered in the text. The Key Messages encapsulate the main conclusions of the review. Footnotes: Avoid footnotes. Tables and illustrations: Tables are part of the text. Place them at the end of the text file. Illustration data must be stored as separate files. Do not integrate figures into the text. Electronically submitted b/w half-tone and color illustrations must have a final resolution of 300 dpi after scaling, line drawings one of 800–1,200 dpi. Color illustrations Online edition: Color illustrations are reproduced free of charge. In the print version, the illustrations are reproduced in black and white. Please avoid referring to the colors in the text and figure legends. Print edition: Up to 6 color illustrations per page can be integrated within the text at CHF 800.– per page. References: In the text identify references by Arabic numerals [in square brackets]. Material submitted for publication but not yet accepted should be noted as [unpublished data] and not be included in the reference list. The list of references should include only those publications which are cited in the text. Number references in the order in which they are first mentioned in the text; do not list alphabetically. The surnames of the authors followed by initials should be given. There should be no punctuation other than a comma to separate the authors. Preferably, please cite all authors. Abbreviate journal names according to the Index Medicus system. Also see International Committee of Medical Journal Editors: Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals (www. icmje.org). Examples (a) Papers published in periodicals: Tomson C: Vascular calcification in chronic renal failure. Nephron Clin Pract 2003;93:c124–c130. (b) Papers published only with DOI numbers: Theoharides TC, Boucher W, Spear K: Serum interleukin-6 reflects disease severity and osteoporosis in mastocytosis patients. Int Arch Allergy Immunol DOI: 10.1159/000063858. (c) Monographs: Matthews DE, Farewell VT: Using and Understanding Medical Statistics, ed 3, revised. Basel, Karger, 1996. (d) Edited bo
{"title":"Front & Back Matter","authors":"","doi":"10.1159/000362511","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000362511","url":null,"abstract":"Each paper needs an abstract of up to 250 words. It should be structured as follows: Background/Aims: What is the major problem that prompted the study? Methods: How was the study carried out? Results: Most important findings? Conclusion: Most important conclusion? Abstracts of Minireviews: Should be divided into the following subsections: Background, Summary and Key Messages. The Background should provide a brief clinical context for the review and is followed by the Summary, which should include a concise description of the main topics covered in the text. The Key Messages encapsulate the main conclusions of the review.s of Minireviews: Should be divided into the following subsections: Background, Summary and Key Messages. The Background should provide a brief clinical context for the review and is followed by the Summary, which should include a concise description of the main topics covered in the text. The Key Messages encapsulate the main conclusions of the review. Footnotes: Avoid footnotes. Tables and illustrations: Tables are part of the text. Place them at the end of the text file. Illustration data must be stored as separate files. Do not integrate figures into the text. Electronically submitted b/w half-tone and color illustrations must have a final resolution of 300 dpi after scaling, line drawings one of 800–1,200 dpi. Color illustrations Online edition: Color illustrations are reproduced free of charge. In the print version, the illustrations are reproduced in black and white. Please avoid referring to the colors in the text and figure legends. Print edition: Up to 6 color illustrations per page can be integrated within the text at CHF 800.– per page. References: In the text identify references by Arabic numerals [in square brackets]. Material submitted for publication but not yet accepted should be noted as [unpublished data] and not be included in the reference list. The list of references should include only those publications which are cited in the text. Number references in the order in which they are first mentioned in the text; do not list alphabetically. The surnames of the authors followed by initials should be given. There should be no punctuation other than a comma to separate the authors. Preferably, please cite all authors. Abbreviate journal names according to the Index Medicus system. Also see International Committee of Medical Journal Editors: Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals (www. icmje.org). Examples (a) Papers published in periodicals: Tomson C: Vascular calcification in chronic renal failure. Nephron Clin Pract 2003;93:c124–c130. (b) Papers published only with DOI numbers: Theoharides TC, Boucher W, Spear K: Serum interleukin-6 reflects disease severity and osteoporosis in mastocytosis patients. Int Arch Allergy Immunol DOI: 10.1159/000063858. (c) Monographs: Matthews DE, Farewell VT: Using and Understanding Medical Statistics, ed 3, revised. Basel, Karger, 1996. (d) Edited bo","PeriodicalId":19094,"journal":{"name":"Nephron Clinical Practice","volume":"126 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000362511","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64716272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Y. Tse, U. Udayaraj, Rishi Pruthi, A. Casula, Catriona Shaw, R. Steenkamp, A. Davenport, Anirudh Rao, J. Gilg, A. Williams, D. Pitcher, Catherine O’Brien, F. Braddon, Malcolm A. Lewis, H. Maxwell, J. Stojanovic, D. Fogarty, I. Macphee, R. Hilton, L. Pankhurst, N. Mamode, A. Hudson, P. Roderick, R. Ravanan, C. Inward, M. Sinha, T. Feest, Victoria R Briggs, R. Fluck, M. Wilkie, L. Crowley, Jennie Wilson, R. Guy, F. Caskey, K. Farrington, J. Nicholas, A. Dawnay, Satz Mengensatzproduktion, Werner Druck Medien Ag
{"title":"UK Renal Registry 16th Annual Report: Appendix J Laboratory Conversion Factors","authors":"Y. Tse, U. Udayaraj, Rishi Pruthi, A. Casula, Catriona Shaw, R. Steenkamp, A. Davenport, Anirudh Rao, J. Gilg, A. Williams, D. Pitcher, Catherine O’Brien, F. Braddon, Malcolm A. Lewis, H. Maxwell, J. Stojanovic, D. Fogarty, I. Macphee, R. Hilton, L. Pankhurst, N. Mamode, A. Hudson, P. Roderick, R. Ravanan, C. Inward, M. Sinha, T. Feest, Victoria R Briggs, R. Fluck, M. Wilkie, L. Crowley, Jennie Wilson, R. Guy, F. Caskey, K. Farrington, J. Nicholas, A. Dawnay, Satz Mengensatzproduktion, Werner Druck Medien Ag","doi":"10.1159/000360045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000360045","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19094,"journal":{"name":"Nephron Clinical Practice","volume":"125 1","pages":"361 - 362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000360045","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64707101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Y. Tse, U. Udayaraj, Rishi Pruthi, A. Casula, Catriona Shaw, R. Steenkamp, A. Davenport, Anirudh Rao, J. Gilg, A. Williams, D. Pitcher, Catherine O’Brien, F. Braddon, Malcolm A. Lewis, H. Maxwell, J. Stojanovic, D. Fogarty, I. Macphee, R. Hilton, L. Pankhurst, N. Mamode, A. Hudson, P. Roderick, R. Ravanan, C. Inward, M. Sinha, T. Feest, Victoria R Briggs, R. Fluck, M. Wilkie, L. Crowley, Jennie Wilson, R. Guy, F. Caskey, K. Farrington, J. Nicholas, A. Dawnay, Satz Mengensatzproduktion, Werner Druck Medien Ag
ACE (inhibitor) Angiotensin converting enzyme (inhibitor) AKI Acute kidney injury ANZDATA Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry APD Automated peritoneal dialysis ADPKD Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease APKD Adult polycystic kidney disease ATTOM Access to transplant and transplant outcome measures AV Arteriovenous AVF Arteriovenous fistula AVG Arteriovenous graft BAPN British Association of Paediatric Nephrology BCG Bromocresol green BCP Bromocresol purple BMD Bone mineral disease BMI Body mass index BP Blood pressure BSI Blood stream infection BTS British Transplant Society Ca Calcium CAB Clinical Affairs Board (Renal Association) CABG Coronary artery bypass grafting CAPD Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis CCL Clinical Computing Limited CCPD Cycling peritoneal dialysis CDI Clostridium difficile infection Chol Cholesterol CHr Target reticulocyte Hb content CI Confidence interval CK Creatine kinase CKD Chronic kidney disease CKD-EPI Chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration CK-MB Creatine kinase isoenzyme MB COPD Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease CRF Chronic renal failure cRF Calculated HLA antibody reaction frequency CRP C-reactive protein CVVH Continuous veno-venous haemofiltration CXR Chest x-ray DBP Diastolic blood pressure DCCT Diabetes Control and Complications Trial DH Department of Health
{"title":"UK Renal Registry 16th Annual Report: Appendix I Acronyms and Abbreviations used in the Report","authors":"Y. Tse, U. Udayaraj, Rishi Pruthi, A. Casula, Catriona Shaw, R. Steenkamp, A. Davenport, Anirudh Rao, J. Gilg, A. Williams, D. Pitcher, Catherine O’Brien, F. Braddon, Malcolm A. Lewis, H. Maxwell, J. Stojanovic, D. Fogarty, I. Macphee, R. Hilton, L. Pankhurst, N. Mamode, A. Hudson, P. Roderick, R. Ravanan, C. Inward, M. Sinha, T. Feest, Victoria R Briggs, R. Fluck, M. Wilkie, L. Crowley, Jennie Wilson, R. Guy, F. Caskey, K. Farrington, J. Nicholas, A. Dawnay, Satz Mengensatzproduktion, Werner Druck Medien Ag","doi":"10.1159/000360044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000360044","url":null,"abstract":"ACE (inhibitor) Angiotensin converting enzyme (inhibitor) AKI Acute kidney injury ANZDATA Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry APD Automated peritoneal dialysis ADPKD Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease APKD Adult polycystic kidney disease ATTOM Access to transplant and transplant outcome measures AV Arteriovenous AVF Arteriovenous fistula AVG Arteriovenous graft BAPN British Association of Paediatric Nephrology BCG Bromocresol green BCP Bromocresol purple BMD Bone mineral disease BMI Body mass index BP Blood pressure BSI Blood stream infection BTS British Transplant Society Ca Calcium CAB Clinical Affairs Board (Renal Association) CABG Coronary artery bypass grafting CAPD Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis CCL Clinical Computing Limited CCPD Cycling peritoneal dialysis CDI Clostridium difficile infection Chol Cholesterol CHr Target reticulocyte Hb content CI Confidence interval CK Creatine kinase CKD Chronic kidney disease CKD-EPI Chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration CK-MB Creatine kinase isoenzyme MB COPD Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease CRF Chronic renal failure cRF Calculated HLA antibody reaction frequency CRP C-reactive protein CVVH Continuous veno-venous haemofiltration CXR Chest x-ray DBP Diastolic blood pressure DCCT Diabetes Control and Complications Trial DH Department of Health","PeriodicalId":19094,"journal":{"name":"Nephron Clinical Practice","volume":"125 1","pages":"357 - 360"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000360044","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64706965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Y. Tse, U. Udayaraj, Rishi Pruthi, A. Casula, Catriona Shaw, R. Steenkamp, A. Davenport, Anirudh Rao, J. Gilg, A. Williams, D. Pitcher, Catherine O’Brien, F. Braddon, Malcolm A. Lewis, H. Maxwell, J. Stojanovic, D. Fogarty, I. Macphee, R. Hilton, L. Pankhurst, N. Mamode, A. Hudson, P. Roderick, R. Ravanan, C. Inward, M. Sinha, T. Feest, Victoria R Briggs, R. Fluck, M. Wilkie, L. Crowley, Jennie Wilson, R. Guy, F. Caskey, K. Farrington, J. Nicholas, A. Dawnay, Satz Mengensatzproduktion, Werner Druck Medien Ag
The take-on population is defined as all patients over 18 who started RRT at UK renal centres and did not have a recovery lasting more than 90 days within 90 days of starting RRT. The treatment timeline is used to define take-on patients as follows. If a patient has timeline entries from more than one centre then these are all combined and sorted by date. Then, the first treatment entry gives the first date of when they were receiving RRT. This is defined as a ‘start date’. However, in the following situations there is evidence that the patient was already receiving RRT before this ‘start date’ and these people are not classed as take-on patients:
{"title":"UK Renal Registry 16th Annual Report: Appendix B Definitions and Analysis Criteria","authors":"Y. Tse, U. Udayaraj, Rishi Pruthi, A. Casula, Catriona Shaw, R. Steenkamp, A. Davenport, Anirudh Rao, J. Gilg, A. Williams, D. Pitcher, Catherine O’Brien, F. Braddon, Malcolm A. Lewis, H. Maxwell, J. Stojanovic, D. Fogarty, I. Macphee, R. Hilton, L. Pankhurst, N. Mamode, A. Hudson, P. Roderick, R. Ravanan, C. Inward, M. Sinha, T. Feest, Victoria R Briggs, R. Fluck, M. Wilkie, L. Crowley, Jennie Wilson, R. Guy, F. Caskey, K. Farrington, J. Nicholas, A. Dawnay, Satz Mengensatzproduktion, Werner Druck Medien Ag","doi":"10.1159/000360036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000360036","url":null,"abstract":"The take-on population is defined as all patients over 18 who started RRT at UK renal centres and did not have a recovery lasting more than 90 days within 90 days of starting RRT. The treatment timeline is used to define take-on patients as follows. If a patient has timeline entries from more than one centre then these are all combined and sorted by date. Then, the first treatment entry gives the first date of when they were receiving RRT. This is defined as a ‘start date’. However, in the following situations there is evidence that the patient was already receiving RRT before this ‘start date’ and these people are not classed as take-on patients:","PeriodicalId":19094,"journal":{"name":"Nephron Clinical Practice","volume":"125 1","pages":"315 - 318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000360036","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64706546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Y. Tse, U. Udayaraj, Rishi Pruthi, A. Casula, Catriona Shaw, R. Steenkamp, A. Davenport, Anirudh Rao, J. Gilg, A. Williams, D. Pitcher, Catherine O’Brien, F. Braddon, Malcolm A. Lewis, H. Maxwell, J. Stojanovic, D. Fogarty, I. Macphee, R. Hilton, L. Pankhurst, N. Mamode, A. Hudson, P. Roderick, R. Ravanan, C. Inward, M. Sinha, T. Feest, Victoria R Briggs, R. Fluck, M. Wilkie, L. Crowley, Jennie Wilson, R. Guy, F. Caskey, K. Farrington, J. Nicholas, A. Dawnay, Satz Mengensatzproduktion, Werner Druck Medien Ag
The areas used were 146 English primary care trusts (PCTs), five English care trusts, the seven Welsh Local Health Boards, the 14 Scottish Health Boards and the five Health and Social Care Trusts in Northern Ireland – these different types of area are collectively called PCT/HBs here. In England these areas have undergone significant reorganisation with the introduction of clinical commissioning groups in April 2013. This report uses data up to 2012 and continues to report results at PCT level. The analyses used patient postcode rather than the GP postcode. Each postcode was linked to the ONS postcode directory (ONSPD) to give the PCT/HB code. The ONSPD contains National Statistics data # Crown copyright and database right 2013 and also Ordnance Survey data# Crown copyright and database right 2013.
{"title":"UK Renal Registry 16th Annual Report: Appendix D Methodology used for Analyses of PCT/HB Incidence and Prevalence Rates and of Standardised Ratios","authors":"Y. Tse, U. Udayaraj, Rishi Pruthi, A. Casula, Catriona Shaw, R. Steenkamp, A. Davenport, Anirudh Rao, J. Gilg, A. Williams, D. Pitcher, Catherine O’Brien, F. Braddon, Malcolm A. Lewis, H. Maxwell, J. Stojanovic, D. Fogarty, I. Macphee, R. Hilton, L. Pankhurst, N. Mamode, A. Hudson, P. Roderick, R. Ravanan, C. Inward, M. Sinha, T. Feest, Victoria R Briggs, R. Fluck, M. Wilkie, L. Crowley, Jennie Wilson, R. Guy, F. Caskey, K. Farrington, J. Nicholas, A. Dawnay, Satz Mengensatzproduktion, Werner Druck Medien Ag","doi":"10.1159/000360039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000360039","url":null,"abstract":"The areas used were 146 English primary care trusts (PCTs), five English care trusts, the seven Welsh Local Health Boards, the 14 Scottish Health Boards and the five Health and Social Care Trusts in Northern Ireland – these different types of area are collectively called PCT/HBs here. In England these areas have undergone significant reorganisation with the introduction of clinical commissioning groups in April 2013. This report uses data up to 2012 and continues to report results at PCT level. The analyses used patient postcode rather than the GP postcode. Each postcode was linked to the ONS postcode directory (ONSPD) to give the PCT/HB code. The ONSPD contains National Statistics data # Crown copyright and database right 2013 and also Ordnance Survey data# Crown copyright and database right 2013.","PeriodicalId":19094,"journal":{"name":"Nephron Clinical Practice","volume":"125 1","pages":"323 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000360039","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64707086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Providing accurate centre-level incidence and prevalence rates for patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the UK was limited until the 13th Annual Report by the difficulty in estimating the catchment population from which the RRT population was derived. One reason for this was that the geographical boundaries separating renal centres are relatively arbitrary and dependent upon a number of factors including referral practice, patient choice and patient movement. Previously, incidence and prevalence rates had been calculated at Local Authority/Primary Care Trust/Health Board level for which denominator data were available, but not at renal centre level. UK Renal Registry (UKRR) Annual Reports prior to the 13th suggested an estimate of the size of the catchment populations. These were extrapolated figures originally derived from data in the 1992 National Renal Survey undertaken by Paul Roderick. The purpose of this document is to present an estimate of the dialysis catchment population for all renal centres in England and Wales. The document also contains a methodological description and discussion of the limitations of these estimates. The previous three UKRR Annual Reports contained estimates for English renal centres using the same methodology as outlined here but using 2001 Census data and 2007 prevalent dialysis patients and has been explained in detail elsewhere [1]. The methodology has now been repeated using data from the 2011 Census in order to obtain more up to date estimates and also to include renal centres in Wales. Methods
{"title":"UK Renal Registry 16th Annual Report: Appendix E Methodology for Estimating Catchment Populations of Renal Centres in England and Wales for Dialysis Patients","authors":"","doi":"10.1159/000360040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000360040","url":null,"abstract":"Providing accurate centre-level incidence and prevalence rates for patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the UK was limited until the 13th Annual Report by the difficulty in estimating the catchment population from which the RRT population was derived. One reason for this was that the geographical boundaries separating renal centres are relatively arbitrary and dependent upon a number of factors including referral practice, patient choice and patient movement. Previously, incidence and prevalence rates had been calculated at Local Authority/Primary Care Trust/Health Board level for which denominator data were available, but not at renal centre level. UK Renal Registry (UKRR) Annual Reports prior to the 13th suggested an estimate of the size of the catchment populations. These were extrapolated figures originally derived from data in the 1992 National Renal Survey undertaken by Paul Roderick. The purpose of this document is to present an estimate of the dialysis catchment population for all renal centres in England and Wales. The document also contains a methodological description and discussion of the limitations of these estimates. The previous three UKRR Annual Reports contained estimates for English renal centres using the same methodology as outlined here but using 2001 Census data and 2007 prevalent dialysis patients and has been explained in detail elsewhere [1]. The methodology has now been repeated using data from the 2011 Census in order to obtain more up to date estimates and also to include renal centres in Wales. Methods","PeriodicalId":19094,"journal":{"name":"Nephron Clinical Practice","volume":"125 1","pages":"327 - 330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000360040","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64706655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Y. Tse, U. Udayaraj, Rishi Pruthi, A. Casula, Catriona Shaw, R. Steenkamp, A. Davenport, Anirudh Rao, J. Gilg, A. Williams, D. Pitcher, Catherine O’Brien, F. Braddon, Malcolm A. Lewis, H. Maxwell, J. Stojanovic, D. Fogarty, I. Macphee, R. Hilton, L. Pankhurst, N. Mamode, A. Hudson, P. Roderick, R. Ravanan, C. Inward, M. Sinha, T. Feest, Victoria R Briggs, R. Fluck, M. Wilkie, L. Crowley, Jennie Wilson, R. Guy, F. Caskey, K. Farrington, J. Nicholas, A. Dawnay, Satz Mengensatzproduktion, Werner Druck Medien Ag
Y. Tse, U. Udayaraj, Rishi Pruthi, A. Casula, Catriona Shaw, R. Steenkamp, A. Davenport, Anirudh Rao, J. Gilg, A. Williams, D. Pitcher, Catherine O’Brien, F. Braddon, Malcolm A. Lewis, H. Maxwell, J. Stojanovic, D. Fogarty, I. Macphee, R. Hilton, L. Pankhurst, N. Mamode, A. Hudson, P. Roderick, R. Ravanan, C. Inward, M. Sinha, T. Feest, Victoria R Briggs, R. Fluck, M. Wilkie, L. Crowley, Jennie Wilson, R. Guy, F. Caskey, K. Farrington, J. Nicholas, A. Dawnay, Satz Mengensatzproduktion, Werner Druck Medien Ag
Ethnicity data is recorded in the clinical information systems in the individual renal centres in the format of 9S. . . read codes. If extracted from local PAS systems in a different format, it is recoded to the 9S. . . format by the centre, before being sent to the UK Renal Registry (UKRR). For report analyses, ethnic categories are condensed into five groups (White, South Asian, Black, Chinese and Other). For some analyses Chinese are grouped into Other.
{"title":"UK Renal Registry 16th Annual Report: Appendix H Coding: Ethnicity, EDTA Primary Renal Diagnoses, EDTA Causes of Death","authors":"Y. Tse, U. Udayaraj, Rishi Pruthi, A. Casula, Catriona Shaw, R. Steenkamp, A. Davenport, Anirudh Rao, J. Gilg, A. Williams, D. Pitcher, Catherine O’Brien, F. Braddon, Malcolm A. Lewis, H. Maxwell, J. Stojanovic, D. Fogarty, I. Macphee, R. Hilton, L. Pankhurst, N. Mamode, A. Hudson, P. Roderick, R. Ravanan, C. Inward, M. Sinha, T. Feest, Victoria R Briggs, R. Fluck, M. Wilkie, L. Crowley, Jennie Wilson, R. Guy, F. Caskey, K. Farrington, J. Nicholas, A. Dawnay, Satz Mengensatzproduktion, Werner Druck Medien Ag","doi":"10.1159/000360043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000360043","url":null,"abstract":"Ethnicity data is recorded in the clinical information systems in the individual renal centres in the format of 9S. . . read codes. If extracted from local PAS systems in a different format, it is recoded to the 9S. . . format by the centre, before being sent to the UK Renal Registry (UKRR). For report analyses, ethnic categories are condensed into five groups (White, South Asian, Black, Chinese and Other). For some analyses Chinese are grouped into Other.","PeriodicalId":19094,"journal":{"name":"Nephron Clinical Practice","volume":"125 1","pages":"353 - 356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000360043","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64706811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Y. Tse, U. Udayaraj, Rishi Pruthi, A. Casula, Catriona Shaw, R. Steenkamp, A. Davenport, Anirudh Rao, J. Gilg, A. Williams, D. Pitcher, Catherine O’Brien, F. Braddon, Malcolm A. Lewis, H. Maxwell, J. Stojanovic, D. Fogarty, I. Macphee, R. Hilton, L. Pankhurst, N. Mamode, A. Hudson, P. Roderick, R. Ravanan, C. Inward, M. Sinha, T. Feest, Victoria R Briggs, R. Fluck, M. Wilkie, L. Crowley, Jennie Wilson, R. Guy, F. Caskey, K. Farrington, J. Nicholas, A. Dawnay, Satz Mengensatzproduktion, Werner Druck Medien Ag
England Basildon Basildon Hospital Basldn Birmingham Heartlands Hospital B Heart Birmingham Queen Elizabeth Hospital B QEH Bradford St Luke’s Hospital Bradfd Brighton Royal Sussex County Hospital Brightn Bristol Southmead Hospital Bristol Cambridge Addenbrooke’s Hospital Camb Carlisle Cumberland Infirmary Carlis Carshalton St Helier Hospital Carsh Chelmsford Broomfield Hospital Chelms Colchester Colchester General Hospital Colchr Coventry University Hospital Coventry Covnt Derby Royal Derby Hospital Derby Doncaster Doncaster Royal Infirmary Donc Dorset Dorset County Hospital Dorset Dudley Russells Hall Hospital Dudley Exeter Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital Exeter Gloucester Gloucestershire Royal Hospital Glouc Hull Hull Royal Infirmary Hull Ipswich Ipswich Hospital Ipswi Kent Kent and Canterbury Hospital Kent Leeds St James’s University Hospital and Leeds General Infirmary Leeds Leicester Leicester General Hospital Leic Liverpool Aintree University Hospital Liv Ain Liverpool Royal Liverpool University Hospital Liv RI London St. Bartholomew’s Hospital and The Royal London Hospital L Barts London St George’s Hospital and Queen Mary’s Hospital L St. G London Guy’s Hospital and St Thomas’ Hospital L Guys London Hammersmith, Charing Cross, St Mary’s L West London King’s College Hospital L Kings London Royal Free, Middlesex and UCL Hospitals L Rfree Manchester Manchester Royal Infirmary M RI Middlesbrough The James Cook University Hospital Middlbr Newcastle Freeman Hospital and Royal Victoria Infirmary Newc Norwich Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Norwch
{"title":"UK Renal Registry 16th Annual Report: Appendix K Renal Centre Names and Abbreviations used in the Figures and Data Tables","authors":"Y. Tse, U. Udayaraj, Rishi Pruthi, A. Casula, Catriona Shaw, R. Steenkamp, A. Davenport, Anirudh Rao, J. Gilg, A. Williams, D. Pitcher, Catherine O’Brien, F. Braddon, Malcolm A. Lewis, H. Maxwell, J. Stojanovic, D. Fogarty, I. Macphee, R. Hilton, L. Pankhurst, N. Mamode, A. Hudson, P. Roderick, R. Ravanan, C. Inward, M. Sinha, T. Feest, Victoria R Briggs, R. Fluck, M. Wilkie, L. Crowley, Jennie Wilson, R. Guy, F. Caskey, K. Farrington, J. Nicholas, A. Dawnay, Satz Mengensatzproduktion, Werner Druck Medien Ag","doi":"10.1159/000360046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000360046","url":null,"abstract":"England Basildon Basildon Hospital Basldn Birmingham Heartlands Hospital B Heart Birmingham Queen Elizabeth Hospital B QEH Bradford St Luke’s Hospital Bradfd Brighton Royal Sussex County Hospital Brightn Bristol Southmead Hospital Bristol Cambridge Addenbrooke’s Hospital Camb Carlisle Cumberland Infirmary Carlis Carshalton St Helier Hospital Carsh Chelmsford Broomfield Hospital Chelms Colchester Colchester General Hospital Colchr Coventry University Hospital Coventry Covnt Derby Royal Derby Hospital Derby Doncaster Doncaster Royal Infirmary Donc Dorset Dorset County Hospital Dorset Dudley Russells Hall Hospital Dudley Exeter Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital Exeter Gloucester Gloucestershire Royal Hospital Glouc Hull Hull Royal Infirmary Hull Ipswich Ipswich Hospital Ipswi Kent Kent and Canterbury Hospital Kent Leeds St James’s University Hospital and Leeds General Infirmary Leeds Leicester Leicester General Hospital Leic Liverpool Aintree University Hospital Liv Ain Liverpool Royal Liverpool University Hospital Liv RI London St. Bartholomew’s Hospital and The Royal London Hospital L Barts London St George’s Hospital and Queen Mary’s Hospital L St. G London Guy’s Hospital and St Thomas’ Hospital L Guys London Hammersmith, Charing Cross, St Mary’s L West London King’s College Hospital L Kings London Royal Free, Middlesex and UCL Hospitals L Rfree Manchester Manchester Royal Infirmary M RI Middlesbrough The James Cook University Hospital Middlbr Newcastle Freeman Hospital and Royal Victoria Infirmary Newc Norwich Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Norwch","PeriodicalId":19094,"journal":{"name":"Nephron Clinical Practice","volume":"125 1","pages":"363 - 364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000360046","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64706683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}