To perform posturographic measurements with eyes open or closed using floor coverings with different textured surfaces to study postural control in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Static posturographic recordings were performed with eyes open and eyes closed on a forceplate with no covering (control condition) or covered by a textured mat with small pimples (height 2 mm) or large pimples (height 7 mm). Several posturographic variables were measured, focusing on displacements of the center of pressure (CoP) including the average velocity (Vav), the total length (L) of all displacements, and the surface (S) of the confidence ellipse. The recordings made with the textured mats were compared to the control condition with eyes open or closed. Then, the differences between the recordings made with large vs. small pimples on the one hand, and with eyes closed vs. open were calculated to assess the impact of pimple height or eye closure on posturographic measurements. Clinical assessment was based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and its functional system (FS) subscores, the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), the Unipodal Stance test (UST), and the Timed Up-and-Go test (TUG).
Forty-six MS patients (mean EDSS score: 3.6) completed the study. Several posturographic variables, including Vav and L, deteriorated when measured on a textured mat, especially with large pimples and in eyes open condition. In contrast, no difference was found with small pimples and eyes closed, as compared to the control condition (no covering). The deleterious impact of pimple height on posturography correlated positively with the alteration of balance and gait clinically assessed by the UST and the TUG, and also with the MFIS physical and cerebral EDSS-FS subscores, and negatively with the cerebellar and brainstem subscores. On the other hand, the impact of eye closure on posturography was negatively correlated with the visual EDSS-FS subscore.
Static posturographic measurements made with different textured surfaces and visual conditions can be considered as a sensitive tool to measure "proprioceptive reserves". Actually, when cerebellar, brainstem, or visual functions are impaired, the resources of the sensory (proprioceptive) system, if preserved, can be recruited at a higher level and compensate for dysfunctions of other postural controls to maintain a satisfactory balance. In addition, this procedure of static posturographic examination can provide objective measurements correlated with clinical testing of balance and gait and could usefully complement EDSS scoring to assess disability affecting postural control and the risk of falling in MS patients.
To update a systematic review of the efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for analgesia, for antidepressant effects, and to reduce the impact of fibromyalgia (FM), looking for optimal areas of stimulation.
We searched five databases to identify randomized controlled trials comparing active and sham tDCS for FM. The primary outcome was pain intensity, and secondary outcome measures included FM Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) and depression score. Meta-analysis was conducted using standardized mean difference (SMD). Subgroup analysis was performed to determine the effects of different regional stimulation, over the primary motor cortex (M1), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), opercular-insular cortex (OIC), and occipital nerve (ON) regions. We analyzed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) by the value of the mean difference (MD) for an 11-point scale for pain, the Beck Depressive Inventory-II (BDI-II), and the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) score. We described the certainty of the evidence (COE) using the tool GRADE profile.
Twenty studies were included in the analysis. Active tDCS had a positive effect on pain (SMD= -1.04; 95 % CI -1.38 to -0.69), depression (SMD= -0.46; 95 % CI -0.64 to -0.29), FIQ (SMD= -0.73; 95 % CI -1.09 to –0.36), COE is moderate. Only group M1 (SD=-1.57) and DLPFC (SD=-1.44) could achieve MCID for analgesia; For BDI-II, only group DLPFC (SD=-5.36) could achieve an MCID change. Adverse events were mild.
tDCS is a safe intervention that relieves pain intensity, reduces depression, and reduces the impact of FM on life. Achieving an MCID is related to the stimulation site and the target symptom.
To compare the prevalence of benign EEG variants (BEVs) between epileptic and non-epileptic subjects.
A prospective, observational EEG study of 1,163 consecutive patients, using the 10–20 international system with systematically two additional anterior/inferior temporal electrodes. The video-EEG monitoring duration was between 24 h and eight days.
We identified 917 (78.9%) epileptic patients (mean age: 33.42 ± 15.5 years; females: 53.4%) and 246 (21.2%) non-epileptic patients (mean age: 35.6 ± 18.75 years; females: 54.9%). Despite a shorter mean duration of the EEG recordings, the prevalence of BEVs was higher in non-epileptic vs. epileptic patients (73.2% vs. 57.8%, p = 0.000011). This statistical difference was confirmed for lambda waves (23.6% in the non-epilepsy group vs. 14.8% in the epilepsy group, p = 0.001), POSTs (50.8% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.000001), wicket spikes (20.3% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.009) in particular in NREM and REM sleep, and 14- and 6-Hz positive bursts (13% vs. 7.1% p = 0.003). Mu rhythm was observed at the same frequency in both groups (21.1% in the non-epilepsy group vs. 22.7% in the epilepsy group). There was no difference between the two groups for rarer rhythms, such as rhythmic mid-temporal theta burst of drowsiness, small sharp spikes, and midline theta rhythm.
There was no increase in any of the BEVs in the epilepsy group. On the contrary, BEVs were more frequent and diversified in the non-epilepsy group. Epilepsy may negatively affect the occurrence of the most common BEVs, with the exception of the mu rhythm, which is present in about one-fifth of the population with or without epilepsy.
To examine postnatal functional status of the brainstem auditory pathway in late preterm infants and detect any postnatal auditory abnormality.
Thirty preterm infants born at 33–36 weeks gestation were studied three months after term. None had major perinatal and postnatal complications to minimize confounding effects. Brainstem auditory evoked responses were recorded with 21–91/s clicks.
Compared with postnatal age-matched normal term infants, the late preterm infants did not manifest any major abnormalities in brainstem auditory evoked responses at conventionally used 21/s clicks. At higher click rates, however, the late preterm infants manifested a moderate prolongation in BAER wave V latency. All interpeak intervals tended to be prolonged at higher click rates. The I-V interval was significantly prolonged at 51/s and particularly at 91/s clicks. Both the I-III and III-V intervals were significantly prolonged at 91/s. The late preterm infants also manifested reduced amplitudes of BAER waves III and V at most click rates.
The central components of the brainstem auditory evoked responses were abnormal at higher click rates three months after term in the late preterm infants. Postnatal brainstem auditory function is suboptimal in late preterm infants without major complications. This suboptimal brainstem auditory function may not be clearly shown at term or an earlier stage, but can be shown later. Late preterm infants, although they may not have major complications, should be followed for later auditory development, providing valuable information for improving postnatal care.
To synthesise the literature on the efficacy of primary motor cortex anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (M1-a-tDCS), as a standalone or priming technique, for pain reduction in people with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).
The systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and CENTRAL according to PRISMA statement.
Fourteen studies involving 740 people with KOA were included. In the meta-analysis, six studies compared a-tDCS alone with sham stimulation, and five studies compared a-tDCS combined with other methods with sham stimulation. We found positive effect of a-tDCS alone on pain in KOA (standard mean difference (SMD) −0.52; 95% CI, −0.78 to −0.25; P=0.001; I2 = 69%). Further, a-tDCS with other treatments showed positive effect (SMD −1.23; 95% CI, −1.59 to −0.88; P<0.001; I2 = 48%) on pain in people with KOA. This evidence showed low certainty due to a high risk of bias and imprecision.
A-tDCS could be considered as standalone and an adjunct treatment for pain reduction in people with KOA. Future randomised studies should address quality issues, including small sample size, to enhance the overall certainty of the findings.
A-tDCS can be used as a standalone and adjunct treatment for KOA.
PROSPERO number CRD42021255114
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has demonstrated its efficacy in alleviating pain among individuals with musculoskeletal disorders. This review focuses on the application of tDCS as a therapeutic intervention for managing knee osteoarthritis (OA), a prevalent musculoskeletal condition. The primary objective is to assess the effectiveness of tDCS(add-on tDCS and /or stand-alone tDCS), whether as an add-on to existing treatments or as a standalone therapy, in reducing pain and enhancing functional capacity in patients with knee OA.
A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, OVID, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, ProQuest, and Google Scholar, and Web of Science. The search terms employed were "Transcranial direct current stimulation" or "tDCS" in combination with "Osteoarthritis" or "OA" and "knee." After eliminating duplicates and studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria, a total of 14 relevant articles were identified for review.
Among the included studies, twelve reported statistically significant improvements in pain levels when comparing the active tDCS group to the sham tDCS group. Only two studies reported no significant difference in pain intensity between the active tDCS and sham tDCS groups. Findings regarding functional abilities were diverse, with some studies demonstrating a significant enhancement in functional outcomes in the active tDCS group, while others observed no statistically significant differences.
The results of this review suggest that tDCS holds promise as a pain management intervention for individuals with knee OA. Notably, anodal tDCS applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) appears to be particularly effective in alleviating pain in patients with knee OA. However, the impact of tDCS on functional performance appears to be limited.
The present study investigated the relationship between three genetic polymorphisms of OPRM1 (rs1799971 - A118G and rs1799972 - C17T) and BDNF (rs6265 - C196T) and EEG-measured brain oscillations in Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA) patients.
We performed a cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study (DEFINE cohort), KOA arm, with 66 patients, considering demographic (age, sex, and education), clinical (pain intensity and duration), OPRM1 (rs1799971 - A118G and rs1799972 - C17T) and BDNF (rs6265 - C196T) genotypes, and electrophysiological measures. Brain oscillations relative power from Delta, Theta, Alpha, Low Alpha, High Alpha, Beta, Low Beta and High Beta oscillations were measured during resting state EEG. Multivariate regression models were used to explore the main brain oscillation predictors of the three genetic polymorphisms.
Our findings demonstrate that Theta and Low Beta oscillations are associated with the variant allele of OPRM1-rs1799971 (A118G) on left frontal and left central regions, respectively, while Alpha brain oscillation is associated with variant genotypes (CT/TT) of BDNF-rs6265 on frontal (decrease of oscillation power) and left central (increase of oscillation power) regions. No significant model was found for OPRM1-rs1799972 (C17T) in addition to the inclusion of pain intensity as a significant predictor of this last model.
One potential interpretation for these findings is that polymorphisms of OPRM1 – that is involved with endogenous pain control - lead to increased compensatory oscillatory mechanisms, characterized by increased theta oscillations. Along the same line, polymorphisms of the BDNF lead to decreased alpha oscillations in the frontal area, likely also reflecting the disruption of resting states to also compensate for the increased injury associated with knee OA. It is possible that these polymorphisms require additional brain adaption to the knee OA related injury.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：