首页 > 最新文献

Neurology. Clinical practice最新文献

英文 中文
Erratum: Role of Central Sensitization Syndrome in Patients With Autonomic Symptoms. 勘误:中枢致敏综合征在自主神经症状患者中的作用。
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200490
Peter Novak, Sadie P Marciano, Alexandra Witte

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200463.].

[这更正了文章DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200463.]。
{"title":"Erratum: Role of Central Sensitization Syndrome in Patients With Autonomic Symptoms.","authors":"Peter Novak, Sadie P Marciano, Alexandra Witte","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200490","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200490","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200463.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 4","pages":"e200490"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153500/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144285789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management of Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Era of Anti-Amyloid Therapy: A Worldwide Neurology Survey. 抗淀粉样蛋白治疗时代轻度认知障碍患者的管理:一项全球神经病学调查。
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-25 DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200507
Graham A McLeod, Aaron R Switzer, Luca Bartolini, Alonso Gonzalo Zea Vera, Eric E Smith, Aravind Ganesh

Background and objectives: The aim of this study was to explore practice patterns in managing mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The investigation and management of MCI is considered important because it offers the opportunity to potentially stave off conversion to dementia. However, there are few data on current practices/approaches in this area, especially worldwide; such data can help identify potential disparities and anticipate adoption of new therapies.

Methods: We performed a worldwide electronic survey of neurology practitioners through the Practice Current section of Neurology® Clinical Practice with clinical and practice-related questions in November 2019-August 2021 and repeated it in May-October 2023 after the FDA's approval of aducanumab and lecanemab but before the approval of donanemab. Clinical questions addressed access to and utilization of diagnostic investigations, pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management of MCI, and (in 2023) attitudes toward novel anti-amyloid agents. Responses were compared using the Fisher exact test and multivariable logistic regression adjusted for region, regional income, year of survey response, years in practice, and number of cognitive patients seen annually.

Results: We received 1,257 responses from 95 countries, including 237 cognitive subspecialists and 464 respondents from low-/middle-income countries. On multivariable analysis, cognitive subspecialists were more likely than other practitioners to investigate MCI with a lumbar puncture (aOR 1.90, 95% CI 1.32-2.73), luorodeoxyglucose-PET (FDG-PET) (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.00-2.10) and to offer pharmacotherapy if investigations suggested neurodegeneration (aOR 1.92, 95% CI 1.29-2.85). Regionally, respondents from Europe, Latin America, and Asia were more likely than those from the United States/Canada to order FDG-PET (e.g., Europe: aOR 2.38, 95% CI 1.29-4.39) and amyloid PET (Europe: aOR 3.30, 95% CI 1.85-5.87), controlling for reported access to these tests. Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches were comparable between cognitive subspecialists and other respondents. Despite concerns about safety (77.1% expressed being somewhat or very concerned), attitudes toward prescribing new anti-amyloid agents were similar among all respondents, reflecting a generally favorable attitude (e.g., 62% would prescribe anti-amyloid therapy if it was available).

Discussion: Our results highlight practice differences among cognitive subspecialists and other practitioners worldwide in the management of MCI. Attitudes toward anti-amyloid therapy indicate cautious optimism, with concerns about side effects but a general interest to prescribe.

背景和目的:本研究的目的是探讨轻度认知障碍(MCI)治疗的实践模式。MCI的调查和管理被认为是重要的,因为它提供了潜在的机会,避免转变为痴呆症。然而,关于这一领域的现行做法/方法的数据很少,特别是在世界范围内;这些数据可以帮助识别潜在的差异,并预测新疗法的采用。方法:我们在2019年11月至2021年8月期间通过《神经学®临床实践》的Practice Current部分对神经病学从业人员进行了一项全球电子调查,其中包含临床和实践相关的问题,并在FDA批准aducanumab和lecanemab后,但在批准donanemab之前,于2023年5月至10月重复了这项调查。临床问题涉及诊断调查的获取和利用,MCI的药物和非药物管理,以及(2023年)对新型抗淀粉样蛋白药物的态度。采用Fisher精确检验和多变量logistic回归对地区、地区收入、调查反应年份、实践年数和每年认知患者数量进行调整。结果:我们收到了来自95个国家的1,257份回复,其中包括237名认知亚专家和464名来自中低收入国家的受访者。在多变量分析中,认知专科医生比其他医生更有可能调查腰穿刺MCI (aOR 1.90, 95% CI 1.32-2.73),氟氧葡萄糖pet (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.00-2.10),如果调查显示神经退行性变(aOR 1.92, 95% CI 1.29-2.85),则提供药物治疗。从区域来看,来自欧洲、拉丁美洲和亚洲的受访者比来自美国/加拿大的受访者更有可能订购FDG-PET(例如,欧洲:aOR 2.38, 95% CI 1.29-4.39)和淀粉样PET(欧洲:aOR 3.30, 95% CI 1.85-5.87),控制了这些测试的报告获取情况。在认知亚专科医生和其他应答者之间,药物和非药物方法具有可比性。尽管担心安全性(77.1%表示有点或非常担心),但所有受访者对处方新的抗淀粉样蛋白药物的态度相似,反映出普遍有利的态度(例如,如果有抗淀粉样蛋白治疗,62%的人会开处方)。讨论:我们的研究结果突出了认知亚专科医生和世界各地其他从业人员在MCI管理方面的实践差异。对抗淀粉样蛋白治疗的态度显示出谨慎的乐观态度,担心副作用,但普遍对开处方感兴趣。
{"title":"Management of Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Era of Anti-Amyloid Therapy: A Worldwide Neurology Survey.","authors":"Graham A McLeod, Aaron R Switzer, Luca Bartolini, Alonso Gonzalo Zea Vera, Eric E Smith, Aravind Ganesh","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200507","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200507","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore practice patterns in managing mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The investigation and management of MCI is considered important because it offers the opportunity to potentially stave off conversion to dementia. However, there are few data on current practices/approaches in this area, especially worldwide; such data can help identify potential disparities and anticipate adoption of new therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a worldwide electronic survey of neurology practitioners through the Practice Current section of <i>Neurology</i>® <i>Clinical Practice</i> with clinical and practice-related questions in November 2019-August 2021 and repeated it in May-October 2023 after the FDA's approval of aducanumab and lecanemab but before the approval of donanemab. Clinical questions addressed access to and utilization of diagnostic investigations, pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management of MCI, and (in 2023) attitudes toward novel anti-amyloid agents. Responses were compared using the Fisher exact test and multivariable logistic regression adjusted for region, regional income, year of survey response, years in practice, and number of cognitive patients seen annually.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 1,257 responses from 95 countries, including 237 cognitive subspecialists and 464 respondents from low-/middle-income countries. On multivariable analysis, cognitive subspecialists were more likely than other practitioners to investigate MCI with a lumbar puncture (aOR 1.90, 95% CI 1.32-2.73), luorodeoxyglucose-PET (FDG-PET) (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.00-2.10) and to offer pharmacotherapy if investigations suggested neurodegeneration (aOR 1.92, 95% CI 1.29-2.85). Regionally, respondents from Europe, Latin America, and Asia were more likely than those from the United States/Canada to order FDG-PET (e.g., Europe: aOR 2.38, 95% CI 1.29-4.39) and amyloid PET (Europe: aOR 3.30, 95% CI 1.85-5.87), controlling for reported access to these tests. Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches were comparable between cognitive subspecialists and other respondents. Despite concerns about safety (77.1% expressed being somewhat or very concerned), attitudes toward prescribing new anti-amyloid agents were similar among all respondents, reflecting a generally favorable attitude (e.g., 62% would prescribe anti-amyloid therapy if it was available).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results highlight practice differences among cognitive subspecialists and other practitioners worldwide in the management of MCI. Attitudes toward anti-amyloid therapy indicate cautious optimism, with concerns about side effects but a general interest to prescribe.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 4","pages":"e200507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204774/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144528934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relationship Between Thrombolysis-to-Puncture Time and Outcomes of Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke. 急性缺血性卒中溶栓至穿刺时间与血管内取栓效果的关系。
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-11 DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200434
Xu Tong, Baixue Jia, Gaoting Ma, Xuelei Zhang, Jens Fiehler, Fabian Flottmann, Matthias Bechstein, Gabriel Broocks, Uta Hanning, Helge C Kniep, Götz Thomalla, Milani Deb-Chatterji, Gerhard Schön, Yijun Zhang, Feng Gao, Ning Ma, Dapeng Mo, Zhongrong Miao, Lukas Meyer

Background and objectives: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) followed by endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) improves functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). There are limited data on the effect of thrombolysis-to-puncture time (TTP) on outcomes in patients with AIS undergoing IVT plus EVT.

Methods: We selected 1,104 patients receiving IVT + EVT for anterior circulation LVO stroke from 2 prospective nationwide registries (259 cases from ANGEL-ACT in China: November 2017 to March 2019, 845 cases from German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment in Germany: June 2015 to December 2019). Based on the TTP, eligible patients were divided into 4 groups (≤30 min, 31-50 min, 51-70 min, and >70 min). The radiologic and clinical outcomes (e.g., successful recanalization [modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b-3] at final angiogram, modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0-2 at 90 days, any intracranial hemorrhage [ICH], and symptomatic ICH within 24 hours) among the 4 groups were compared by χ2 tests for trend and using multivariable logistic regression models.

Results: In the 4 groups from ≤30 min to >70 min, 226, 282, 230, and 366 patients were included, respectively. An increased TTP was associated with a lower chance of successful recanalization (p = 0.016) and mRS score 0-2 (p = 0.002). Compared with the group of ≤30 min, the group of >70 min was less likely to achieve successful recanalization (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.89) and the groups of 50-70 min and >70 min had a reduced probability of mRS score 0-2 (adjusted OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.78; adjusted OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.37-0.85). No significant differences were found for any ICH or symptomatic ICH among the 4 groups after adjustment with potential confounders.

Discussion: Delay from thrombolysis to puncture should be minimized when considering bridging IVT before EVT for patients with AIS due to anterior circulation LVO. Further studies are warranted to verify and expand on these findings.

Trial registration information: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03370939 and NCT03356392.

背景和目的:静脉溶栓(IVT)后血管内取栓(EVT)可改善由大血管闭塞(LVO)引起的急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的功能结局。关于溶栓至穿刺时间(TTP)对AIS患者接受IVT + EVT的预后影响的数据有限。方法:我们从2个前瞻性全国登记处选择了1104例接受IVT + EVT治疗前循环LVO卒中的患者(259例来自中国ANGEL-ACT: 2017年11月至2019年3月,845例来自德国卒中登记处-血管内治疗:2015年6月至2019年12月)。根据TTP将符合条件的患者分为≤30 min、31 ~ 50 min、51 ~ 70 min和bb0 ~ 70 min 4组。采用χ2趋势检验和多变量logistic回归模型比较4组患者的影像学和临床预后(如终期血管造影时再通成功[改良脑梗死溶栓评分为2 ~ 3分]、90 d时改良Rankin量表评分为0 ~ 2分、有无颅内出血(ICH)、24小时内有症状的脑出血)。结果:≤30min ~≤70min 4组,分别纳入226例、282例、230例、366例患者。TTP升高与再通成功几率降低(p = 0.016)和mRS评分0-2 (p = 0.002)相关。与≤30 min组相比,>70 min组再通成功的可能性较低(校正优势比[OR] = 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.89), 50-70 min组和>70 min组mRS评分0-2的概率较低(校正OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.78;调整OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.37-0.85)。在对潜在混杂因素进行校正后,四组之间没有发现任何脑出血或症状性脑出血的显著差异。讨论:对于前循环LVO导致的AIS患者,在EVT前考虑桥接IVT时,应尽量减少从溶栓到穿刺的延迟。需要进一步的研究来验证和扩展这些发现。试验注册信息:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03370939和NCT03356392。
{"title":"Relationship Between Thrombolysis-to-Puncture Time and Outcomes of Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke.","authors":"Xu Tong, Baixue Jia, Gaoting Ma, Xuelei Zhang, Jens Fiehler, Fabian Flottmann, Matthias Bechstein, Gabriel Broocks, Uta Hanning, Helge C Kniep, Götz Thomalla, Milani Deb-Chatterji, Gerhard Schön, Yijun Zhang, Feng Gao, Ning Ma, Dapeng Mo, Zhongrong Miao, Lukas Meyer","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200434","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200434","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) followed by endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) improves functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). There are limited data on the effect of thrombolysis-to-puncture time (TTP) on outcomes in patients with AIS undergoing IVT plus EVT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected 1,104 patients receiving IVT + EVT for anterior circulation LVO stroke from 2 prospective nationwide registries (259 cases from ANGEL-ACT in China: November 2017 to March 2019, 845 cases from German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment in Germany: June 2015 to December 2019). Based on the TTP, eligible patients were divided into 4 groups (≤30 min, 31-50 min, 51-70 min, and >70 min). The radiologic and clinical outcomes (e.g., successful recanalization [modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b-3] at final angiogram, modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0-2 at 90 days, any intracranial hemorrhage [ICH], and symptomatic ICH within 24 hours) among the 4 groups were compared by χ<sup>2</sup> tests for trend and using multivariable logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 4 groups from ≤30 min to >70 min, 226, 282, 230, and 366 patients were included, respectively. An increased TTP was associated with a lower chance of successful recanalization (<i>p</i> = 0.016) and mRS score 0-2 (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Compared with the group of ≤30 min, the group of >70 min was less likely to achieve successful recanalization (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.89) and the groups of 50-70 min and >70 min had a reduced probability of mRS score 0-2 (adjusted OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.78; adjusted OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.37-0.85). No significant differences were found for any ICH or symptomatic ICH among the 4 groups after adjustment with potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Delay from thrombolysis to puncture should be minimized when considering bridging IVT before EVT for patients with AIS due to anterior circulation LVO. Further studies are warranted to verify and expand on these findings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration information: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03370939 and NCT03356392.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 4","pages":"e200434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12253961/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144626774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sleep Medicine Resource Utilization in Individuals With Parkinson Disease: A Population Study of Health Administrative Data. 帕金森病患者睡眠药物资源利用:一项健康管理数据的人口研究
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-11 DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200511
Ryan Gotfrit, Robert Talarico, Priti Gros, Marta Kaminska, Tiago A Mestre, Tetyana Kendzerska

Background and objectives: Individuals with Parkinson disease (PD) may face barriers in obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis/management due to sleep being lower priority and sleep disturbances being poorly recognized. Evidence on sleep-medicine service utilization in the PD population is lacking. We conducted a population-based study to identify discrepancies in sleep-medicine resource use (prevalence rates of polysomnograms [PSG] performed and positive airway pressure [PAP] initiated) over a 10-year period between the PD population and the matched non-PD population.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal population-based study using health administrative databases in Ontario from 2012 to 2021 in adults with PD to compare overall and annual prevalence rates of PSGs performed and PAP initiated to 1:1 randomly selected propensity score matched controls from the matched non-PD population based on simultaneous exact matching on age, sex, and calendar year and caliper matched propensity scores from a logistic regression model (based on sociodemographic variables and comorbidities) using validated health administrative definitions to identify PD cases and controls. We hypothesized that the PD population has lower rates of PSGs performed and PAP treatments initiated compared with the similar matched non-PD population. We used Poisson regression to estimate annual prevalence rate ratios to determine the relative change in prevalence over the study period between the groups.

Results: Sixty-five thousand, one hundred sixty-seven patients with PD and 11,460,672 controls met our inclusion criteria. We successfully propensity score matched 64,879 PD cases to controls. From 2012 to 2021, there were a higher prevalence of any PSG performed in the PD population (8.2% vs 6.3%, [RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.25-1.35], p < 0.001) and no difference in the rates of any PAP initiated in the PD population vs controls (4.0% vs 4.1%, [RR: 0.93-1.03, 95% CI: 0.93-1.03], p = 0.46). For both groups, annual prevalence rates generally increased over time. There was no difference in the annual prevalence rate ratio of any PSG performed or any PAP initiated in the PD population vs controls (1.07 [95% CI: 1.06-1.07] vs 1.07 [95% CI: 1.07-1.08], p = 0.5; 1.10 [95% CI: 1.09-1.11] vs 1.11 [95% CI: 1.10-1.11], p = 0.18, respectively).

Discussion: Sleep-medicine resource utilization in the PD population is at least similar to the matched non-PD population and follows the increase with time observed in the general population.

背景和目的:帕金森病(PD)患者在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停诊断/管理方面可能面临障碍,因为睡眠不被优先考虑,睡眠障碍未被充分认识。缺乏PD人群睡眠药物服务使用的证据。我们进行了一项基于人群的研究,以确定PD人群和匹配的非PD人群在10年期间睡眠药物资源使用的差异(进行多导睡眠图[PSG]和气道正压[PAP]启动的患病率)。方法:我们利用安大略省2012年至2021年的卫生管理数据库,对成年PD患者进行了一项回顾性的纵向人群研究,以比较进行psg和启动PAP的总体和年患病率与1:1随机选择的倾向评分匹配的对照,这些对照来自匹配的非PD人群,基于年龄、性别、日历年和卡尺匹配逻辑回归模型(基于社会人口学变量和合并症)的倾向得分,使用经过验证的健康管理定义来识别PD病例和对照。我们假设,与相似匹配的非PD人群相比,PD人群进行psg和PAP治疗的比例较低。我们使用泊松回归来估计年患病率比率,以确定研究期间各组之间患病率的相对变化。结果:65000 167例PD患者和11460672例对照符合我们的纳入标准。我们成功地将64,879例PD病例与对照组相匹配。从2012年到2021年,PD人群中PSG的患病率较高(8.2% vs 6.3%, [RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.25-1.35], p < 0.001), PD人群中PAP的发生率与对照组无差异(4.0% vs 4.1%, [RR: 0.93-1.03, 95% CI: 0.93-1.03], p = 0.46)。对于这两组,年患病率通常随着时间的推移而增加。PD人群中进行PSG或启动PAP的年患病率比与对照组无差异(1.07 [95% CI: 1.06-1.07] vs 1.07 [95% CI: 1.07-1.08], p = 0.5;1.10 [95% CI: 1.09-1.11] vs 1.11 [95% CI: 1.10-1.11], p = 0.18)。讨论:PD人群的睡眠药物资源利用率至少与匹配的非PD人群相似,并且在一般人群中观察到随着时间的推移而增加。
{"title":"Sleep Medicine Resource Utilization in Individuals With Parkinson Disease: A Population Study of Health Administrative Data.","authors":"Ryan Gotfrit, Robert Talarico, Priti Gros, Marta Kaminska, Tiago A Mestre, Tetyana Kendzerska","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200511","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200511","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Individuals with Parkinson disease (PD) may face barriers in obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis/management due to sleep being lower priority and sleep disturbances being poorly recognized. Evidence on sleep-medicine service utilization in the PD population is lacking. We conducted a population-based study to identify discrepancies in sleep-medicine resource use (prevalence rates of polysomnograms [PSG] performed and positive airway pressure [PAP] initiated) over a 10-year period between the PD population and the matched non-PD population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective longitudinal population-based study using health administrative databases in Ontario from 2012 to 2021 in adults with PD to compare overall and annual prevalence rates of PSGs performed and PAP initiated to 1:1 randomly selected propensity score matched controls from the matched non-PD population based on simultaneous exact matching on age, sex, and calendar year and caliper matched propensity scores from a logistic regression model (based on sociodemographic variables and comorbidities) using validated health administrative definitions to identify PD cases and controls. We hypothesized that the PD population has lower rates of PSGs performed and PAP treatments initiated compared with the similar matched non-PD population. We used Poisson regression to estimate annual prevalence rate ratios to determine the relative change in prevalence over the study period between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five thousand, one hundred sixty-seven patients with PD and 11,460,672 controls met our inclusion criteria. We successfully propensity score matched 64,879 PD cases to controls. From 2012 to 2021, there were a higher prevalence of any PSG performed in the PD population (8.2% vs 6.3%, [RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.25-1.35], <i>p</i> < 0.001) and no difference in the rates of any PAP initiated in the PD population vs controls (4.0% vs 4.1%, [RR: 0.93-1.03, 95% CI: 0.93-1.03], <i>p</i> = 0.46). For both groups, annual prevalence rates generally increased over time. There was no difference in the annual prevalence rate ratio of any PSG performed or any PAP initiated in the PD population vs controls (1.07 [95% CI: 1.06-1.07] vs 1.07 [95% CI: 1.07-1.08], <i>p</i> = 0.5; 1.10 [95% CI: 1.09-1.11] vs 1.11 [95% CI: 1.10-1.11], <i>p</i> = 0.18, respectively).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Sleep-medicine resource utilization in the PD population is at least similar to the matched non-PD population and follows the increase with time observed in the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 4","pages":"e200511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12253960/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144626775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erratum: Psychosis in Neurocognitive Disorder Among Ethnoculturally Diverse Older Persons. 勘误:不同民族文化的老年人神经认知障碍中的精神病。
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-07 DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200509
Estevana Isaac, Carolyn Wei Zhu, Monica Rivera Mindt, Albert L Siu, Alex Federman, Kristine Yaffe, Barbara G Vickrey, Jenifer Voeks, Parul Agarwal, Derrick Brooks, Omobolanle Ayo, Mary Sano

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200467.].

[这更正了文章DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200467.]。
{"title":"Erratum: Psychosis in Neurocognitive Disorder Among Ethnoculturally Diverse Older Persons.","authors":"Estevana Isaac, Carolyn Wei Zhu, Monica Rivera Mindt, Albert L Siu, Alex Federman, Kristine Yaffe, Barbara G Vickrey, Jenifer Voeks, Parul Agarwal, Derrick Brooks, Omobolanle Ayo, Mary Sano","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200509","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200509","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200467.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 4","pages":"e200509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12245482/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144608917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Invasive Neurostimulation During Pregnancy for Treatment of Epilepsy and Tourette Syndrome: Maternal and Fetal Outcomes. 妊娠期有创性神经刺激治疗癫痫和抽动秽语综合征:母体和胎儿的结局。
IF 3.2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-11 DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200498
Anhmai Vu, Aisha Abdulrazaq, Brian Lundstrom, Lauren M Jackson, Jeffrey W Britton, William O Tatum, Cornelia Drees, Elizabeth A Coon, Linda M Szymanski, Gregory A Worrell, Kelsey M Smith

Background and objectives: Invasive neurostimulation is rapidly becoming an established option for treatment of neurologic disorders, particularly those that are refractory to pharmacologic treatment. However, there is limited information on the use of neuromodulation during pregnancy. This study explores the safety and clinical outcomes of invasive neuromodulation-specifically vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS)-in pregnant patients with epilepsy and movement disorders.

Methods: Pregnant patients treated with VNS, DBS, or RNS were identified, and charts were reviewed to extract data on maternal epilepsy/movement disorder, treatment, and pregnancy.

Results: A total of 14 patients (9 VNS, 3 DBS, 2 RNS) had 22 pregnancies. Neuromodulation indications included focal epilepsy (n = 6: 3 VNS, 2 RNS, 1 DBS), generalized epilepsy (n = 6: all VNS), and Tourette syndrome (n = 2: both DBS). The average age at implantation was 24.7 years for VNS, 29.6 years for DBS, and 28 years for RNS. Pregnancy complications included miscarriages (n = 4 pregnancies; 1 VNS, 2 DBS, 1 RNS), pre-eclampsia with fetal growth restriction (n = 3: 2 VNS, 1 DBS), and gestational diabetes (2 VNS). In addition, 10 pregnancies (8 VNS, 2 RNS) were complicated by seizure exacerbations. Delivery of eight of the pregnancies (5 VNS, 1 DBS, 2 RNS) was by cesarean section. There were no cases of maternal or neonatal mortality, and there were no major congenital malformations. Owing to exacerbated shortness of breath during the third trimester, 1 patient had her VNS turned off.

Discussion: Pregnancy complications were consistent with previous reports of patients with neurologic disorders. Despite limitations in sample size and confounding factors related to medication use and neurologic diagnosis, our study suggests that implanted neuromodulation devices do not seem to pose a risk of neuromodulation-related teratogenicity. While these data are promising and may provide some reassurance for patient counseling regarding pregnancy, further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary.

背景和目的:侵入性神经刺激正迅速成为治疗神经系统疾病的一种既定选择,特别是那些难以药物治疗的神经系统疾病。然而,关于怀孕期间使用神经调节的信息有限。本研究探讨了侵袭性神经调节-特异性迷走神经刺激(VNS),深部脑刺激(DBS)和反应性神经刺激(RNS)-在妊娠癫痫和运动障碍患者中的安全性和临床结果。方法:选取经VNS、DBS或RNS治疗的孕妇,通过图表提取孕妇癫痫/运动障碍、治疗和妊娠的数据。结果:14例患者(VNS 9例,DBS 3例,RNS 2例)共发生22次妊娠。神经调节适应症包括局灶性癫痫(n = 6: 3个VNS, 2个RNS, 1个DBS),全身性癫痫(n = 6:所有VNS)和妥瑞特综合征(n = 2:两种DBS)。VNS的平均植入年龄为24.7岁,DBS为29.6岁,RNS为28岁。妊娠并发症包括流产(n = 4次妊娠;1例VNS, 2例DBS, 1例RNS),先兆子痫合并胎儿生长受限(n = 3: 2例VNS, 1例DBS)和妊娠糖尿病(2例VNS)。另外,10例妊娠(8例VNS, 2例RNS)并发发作加重。经剖宫产分娩8例(5例中速妊娠,1例DBS妊娠,2例RNS妊娠)。没有产妇或新生儿死亡病例,也没有重大先天性畸形。由于妊娠晚期呼吸急促加剧,1例患者的VNS关闭。讨论:妊娠并发症与先前报道的神经系统疾病患者一致。尽管样本量和与药物使用和神经系统诊断相关的混杂因素有限,但我们的研究表明,植入的神经调节装置似乎不会造成神经调节相关致畸的风险。虽然这些数据很有希望,并可能为患者提供一些关于怀孕的咨询,但进一步的研究需要更大的样本量。
{"title":"Invasive Neurostimulation During Pregnancy for Treatment of Epilepsy and Tourette Syndrome: Maternal and Fetal Outcomes.","authors":"Anhmai Vu, Aisha Abdulrazaq, Brian Lundstrom, Lauren M Jackson, Jeffrey W Britton, William O Tatum, Cornelia Drees, Elizabeth A Coon, Linda M Szymanski, Gregory A Worrell, Kelsey M Smith","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200498","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200498","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Invasive neurostimulation is rapidly becoming an established option for treatment of neurologic disorders, particularly those that are refractory to pharmacologic treatment. However, there is limited information on the use of neuromodulation during pregnancy. This study explores the safety and clinical outcomes of invasive neuromodulation-specifically vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS)-in pregnant patients with epilepsy and movement disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant patients treated with VNS, DBS, or RNS were identified, and charts were reviewed to extract data on maternal epilepsy/movement disorder, treatment, and pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 patients (9 VNS, 3 DBS, 2 RNS) had 22 pregnancies. Neuromodulation indications included focal epilepsy (n = 6: 3 VNS, 2 RNS, 1 DBS), generalized epilepsy (n = 6: all VNS), and Tourette syndrome (n = 2: both DBS). The average age at implantation was 24.7 years for VNS, 29.6 years for DBS, and 28 years for RNS. Pregnancy complications included miscarriages (n = 4 pregnancies; 1 VNS, 2 DBS, 1 RNS), pre-eclampsia with fetal growth restriction (n = 3: 2 VNS, 1 DBS), and gestational diabetes (2 VNS). In addition, 10 pregnancies (8 VNS, 2 RNS) were complicated by seizure exacerbations. Delivery of eight of the pregnancies (5 VNS, 1 DBS, 2 RNS) was by cesarean section. There were no cases of maternal or neonatal mortality, and there were no major congenital malformations. Owing to exacerbated shortness of breath during the third trimester, 1 patient had her VNS turned off.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Pregnancy complications were consistent with previous reports of patients with neurologic disorders. Despite limitations in sample size and confounding factors related to medication use and neurologic diagnosis, our study suggests that implanted neuromodulation devices do not seem to pose a risk of neuromodulation-related teratogenicity. While these data are promising and may provide some reassurance for patient counseling regarding pregnancy, further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 4","pages":"e200498"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161771/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144302579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Infection, Relapses, and Pseudo-Relapses in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis. 多发性硬化症患者的感染、复发和假性复发。
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-04 DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200493
Amber Salter, Samantha Lancia, Mudita Sharma, Gary R Cutter, Robert J Fox, Ruth Ann Marrie

Background and objectives: Infections are associated with an increased risk of relapse and pseudo-relapse in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the relationship with relapses and pseudo-relapses after SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID) vs other infections in MS is poorly understood. Therefore, we compared the occurrence of relapse and pseudo-relapse after COVID and other infections with noninfected participants with MS.

Methods: In spring 2023, we surveyed participants from the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis Registry regarding whether they had had a COVID infection, other infections, relapses, and pseudo-relapses. Recent infections, occurring in the 6 months before the survey, were used to categorize participants into groups: recent COVID, non-COVID infection (with no history of ever having COVID), COVID and non-COVID infections, or uninfected.

Results: Of the 4,787 participants eligible for analysis, 2,927 participants were included, of whom 294 (10%) had a recent COVID infection; 853 (29.1%) had 1 recent infection other than COVID; 246 (8.4%) had a recent COVID and non-COVID infection; and 1,534 (52.4%) had no infection with COVID nor any infection within the past 6 months (uninfected). Compared with no infections, non-COVID infection was associated with a 39% increased likelihood of relapse (1.39, 95% CI [1.04-1.87]), whereas a recent COVID infection was associated with a decreased likelihood of relapse (0.45 [0.23, 0.87]), adjusting for covariates. All infection groups were associated with increased odds of pseudo-relapse compared with the uninfected group (non-COVID infections: 1.78 [1.44, 2.20]; COVID infection: 1.80 [1.32, 2.45]; COVID and non-COVID infection: 3.04 [2.24, 4.12]).

Discussion: Because individuals with MS are at increased risk of infections, the association of infections with relapses and pseudo-relapses is clinically important. The high prevalence of acute worsening after infection, regardless of the type of infection, compared with those with no reported infection, needs to be considered in the management of persons with MS.

背景和目的:感染与多发性硬化症(MS)患者复发和假性复发的风险增加有关。然而,MS中SARS-CoV-2感染(COVID)与其他感染后复发和伪复发的关系尚不清楚。因此,我们比较了未感染ms的参与者在COVID和其他感染后的复发和伪复发的发生率。方法:在2023年春季,我们调查了北美多发性硬化症研究委员会登记处的参与者是否有过COVID感染、其他感染、复发和伪复发。在调查前6个月内发生的近期感染,用于将参与者分为以下几组:近期感染COVID,非COVID感染(没有感染过COVID的历史),COVID和非COVID感染或未感染。结果:在符合分析条件的4,787名参与者中,包括2,927名参与者,其中294名(10%)最近感染了COVID;853例(29.1%)近期有1次非新冠感染;近期感染和非感染246例(8.4%);1534例(52.4%)未感染或6个月内未感染(未感染)。与未感染相比,未感染COVID与复发可能性增加39%相关(1.39,95% CI[1.04-1.87]),而最近感染COVID与复发可能性降低相关(0.45[0.23,0.87]),调整协变量。与未感染组相比,所有感染组的假复发几率均增加(非covid感染:1.78 [1.44,2.20];COVID感染:1.80 [1.32,2.45];新冠肺炎和非新冠肺炎感染:3.04[2.24,4.12])。讨论:由于多发性硬化症患者感染的风险增加,因此感染与复发和假性复发的关联在临床上具有重要意义。无论感染类型如何,与未报告感染的患者相比,感染后急性恶化的高患病率需要在MS患者的管理中加以考虑。
{"title":"Infection, Relapses, and Pseudo-Relapses in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis.","authors":"Amber Salter, Samantha Lancia, Mudita Sharma, Gary R Cutter, Robert J Fox, Ruth Ann Marrie","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200493","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200493","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Infections are associated with an increased risk of relapse and pseudo-relapse in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the relationship with relapses and pseudo-relapses after SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID) vs other infections in MS is poorly understood. Therefore, we compared the occurrence of relapse and pseudo-relapse after COVID and other infections with noninfected participants with MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In spring 2023, we surveyed participants from the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis Registry regarding whether they had had a COVID infection, other infections, relapses, and pseudo-relapses. Recent infections, occurring in the 6 months before the survey, were used to categorize participants into groups: recent COVID, non-COVID infection (with no history of ever having COVID), COVID and non-COVID infections, or uninfected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 4,787 participants eligible for analysis, 2,927 participants were included, of whom 294 (10%) had a recent COVID infection; 853 (29.1%) had 1 recent infection other than COVID; 246 (8.4%) had a recent COVID and non-COVID infection; and 1,534 (52.4%) had no infection with COVID nor any infection within the past 6 months (uninfected). Compared with no infections, non-COVID infection was associated with a 39% increased likelihood of relapse (1.39, 95% CI [1.04-1.87]), whereas a recent COVID infection was associated with a decreased likelihood of relapse (0.45 [0.23, 0.87]), adjusting for covariates. All infection groups were associated with increased odds of pseudo-relapse compared with the uninfected group (non-COVID infections: 1.78 [1.44, 2.20]; COVID infection: 1.80 [1.32, 2.45]; COVID and non-COVID infection: 3.04 [2.24, 4.12]).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Because individuals with MS are at increased risk of infections, the association of infections with relapses and pseudo-relapses is clinically important. The high prevalence of acute worsening after infection, regardless of the type of infection, compared with those with no reported infection, needs to be considered in the management of persons with MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 4","pages":"e200493"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153504/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144285791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"Not Everything That Can Be Counted Counts, and Not Everything That Counts Can Be Counted". “不是所有可以计算的东西都有价值,也不是所有重要的东西都能被计算。”
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-02 DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200514
Adam C Webb
{"title":"\"Not Everything That Can Be Counted Counts, and Not Everything That Counts Can Be Counted\".","authors":"Adam C Webb","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200514","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200514","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 4","pages":"e200514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226005/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144575928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antiseizure Medication Prescription Patterns for Treatment of Post-Traumatic Epilepsy. 治疗创伤后癫痫的抗癫痫药物处方模式。
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-07 DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200466
Matthew Pease, Arka N Mallela, Souvik Roy, Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez, David O Okonkwo, Flora M Hammond, Sergiu Abramovici, Jonathan Elmer, Wesley T Kerr, James Castellano

Background and objective: Post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) is common, occurring in upward of 1 in 3 patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). There are limited data regarding initial prescription patterns and long-term course of antiseizure medications (ASMs).

Methods: The goal of this study was to describe ASM prescription patterns and pharmacoresistance over time. We performed a secondary analysis of a prospective database of patients with severe TBI treated at a single center from 2002 through 2018. We included patients with PTE, defined as at least one seizure more than 7 days from injury, and at least six-month follow-up after PTE onset. ASMs were categorized as older (e.g., phenytoin) or newer (e.g., levetiracetam). We evaluated ASM prescription patterns and their association with epileptology referral and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score. We developed a logistic regression to predict pharmacoresistance.

Results: Our cohort included 84 patients with PTE. ASM prescription for longer than 7 days after injury had only moderate correspondence with early post-traumatic seizures or PTE (Cohen Kappa 41%). At PTE onset, most (53%) were treated with newer ASM monotherapy, with 27% on older ASMs and 20% on multiple ASMs. Patients initially prescribed older ASM monotherapy were less likely to maintain their ASM monotherapy (e.g., medication switch/addition and self-wean) compared with those on newer ASMs (odds ratio [OR] 4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-16.7; p = 0.02). Only 23% of patients were referred to specialized epilepsy care despite 54% trialing 2 or more ASMs. Pharmacoresistance was associated with worse GOS outcomes (p = 0.04). Decompressive hemicraniectomy (OR 6.0; 95% CI 1.4-44; p = 0.03) and initial ASM polytherapy (OR 7.2; 95% CI 1.7-34; p < 0.01) predicted pharmacoresistance at 2 years.

Discussion: We provide evidence suggesting that use of newer generation seizure medications is preferable when treating PTE. In addition, we identified early risk factors of pharmacoresistance, which was associated with poor long-term outcomes.

背景与目的:创伤后癫痫(PTE)很常见,在严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者中发病率高达1 / 3。关于抗癫痫药物的初始处方模式和长期疗程的数据有限。方法:本研究的目的是描述ASM处方模式和耐药性随时间的变化。我们对2002年至2018年在单一中心治疗的严重TBI患者的前瞻性数据库进行了二次分析。我们纳入了PTE患者,定义为在受伤后7天内至少有一次癫痫发作,并在PTE发作后至少随访6个月。asm分为较旧的(如苯妥英)和较新的(如左乙拉西坦)。我们评估了ASM处方模式及其与癫痫学转诊和格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评分的关系。我们采用逻辑回归来预测耐药性。结果:我们的队列包括84例PTE患者,损伤后超过7天的ASM处方与早期创伤后癫痫发作或PTE仅中度对应(Cohen Kappa 41%)。在PTE发病时,大多数(53%)接受新的ASM单药治疗,27%接受旧ASM治疗,20%接受多重ASM治疗。最初接受较早ASM单药治疗的患者与接受较新ASM单药治疗的患者相比,维持ASM单药治疗(例如,药物转换/增加和自我戒断)的可能性较小(优势比[OR] 4.6;95%置信区间[CI] 1.3 ~ 16.7;P = 0.02)。只有23%的患者接受了专门的癫痫治疗,尽管54%的患者接受了2次或更多的抗癫痫药物治疗。药物耐药与GOS预后差相关(p = 0.04)。半颅骨减压切除术(OR 6.0;95% ci 1.4-44;p = 0.03)和初始ASM多疗法(OR 7.2;95% ci 1.7-34;P < 0.01)预测2年耐药。讨论:我们提供的证据表明,在治疗PTE时,使用新一代癫痫药物是可取的。此外,我们确定了药物耐药的早期危险因素,这与不良的长期预后有关。
{"title":"Antiseizure Medication Prescription Patterns for Treatment of Post-Traumatic Epilepsy.","authors":"Matthew Pease, Arka N Mallela, Souvik Roy, Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez, David O Okonkwo, Flora M Hammond, Sergiu Abramovici, Jonathan Elmer, Wesley T Kerr, James Castellano","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200466","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200466","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) is common, occurring in upward of 1 in 3 patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). There are limited data regarding initial prescription patterns and long-term course of antiseizure medications (ASMs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The goal of this study was to describe ASM prescription patterns and pharmacoresistance over time. We performed a secondary analysis of a prospective database of patients with severe TBI treated at a single center from 2002 through 2018. We included patients with PTE, defined as at least one seizure more than 7 days from injury, and at least six-month follow-up after PTE onset. ASMs were categorized as older (e.g., phenytoin) or newer (e.g., levetiracetam). We evaluated ASM prescription patterns and their association with epileptology referral and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score. We developed a logistic regression to predict pharmacoresistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 84 patients with PTE. ASM prescription for longer than 7 days after injury had only moderate correspondence with early post-traumatic seizures or PTE (Cohen Kappa 41%). At PTE onset, most (53%) were treated with newer ASM monotherapy, with 27% on older ASMs and 20% on multiple ASMs. Patients initially prescribed older ASM monotherapy were less likely to maintain their ASM monotherapy (e.g., medication switch/addition and self-wean) compared with those on newer ASMs (odds ratio [OR] 4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-16.7; <i>p</i> = 0.02). Only 23% of patients were referred to specialized epilepsy care despite 54% trialing 2 or more ASMs. Pharmacoresistance was associated with worse GOS outcomes (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Decompressive hemicraniectomy (OR 6.0; 95% CI 1.4-44; <i>p</i> = 0.03) and initial ASM polytherapy (OR 7.2; 95% CI 1.7-34; <i>p</i> < 0.01) predicted pharmacoresistance at 2 years.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We provide evidence suggesting that use of newer generation seizure medications is preferable when treating PTE. In addition, we identified early risk factors of pharmacoresistance, which was associated with poor long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 4","pages":"e200466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12258814/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144643037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erratum: Herpes Zoster Infections With Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study. 勘误:带状疱疹感染伴多发性硬化症疾病修饰疗法:一项真实世界药物警戒研究。
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200505
Alexandra Balshi, Grace Leuenberger, John Dempsey, Nova Manning, Ursela Baber, Jacob A Sloane

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200462.].

[这更正了文章DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200462.]。
{"title":"Erratum: Herpes Zoster Infections With Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study.","authors":"Alexandra Balshi, Grace Leuenberger, John Dempsey, Nova Manning, Ursela Baber, Jacob A Sloane","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200505","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200505","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200462.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 4","pages":"e200505"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153501/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144285780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1