Neurology. Clinical practice最新文献

Purpose of review: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a chronic headache disorder with increasing prevalence. Although characterized by raised intracranial pressure causing papilledema with a risk of visual impairment, psychological symptoms such as depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment are frequently seen but are understudied and under-reported. Together, these can negatively affect quality of life. These were explored through a systematic PRISMA scoping review. OVID, EMBASE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were searched in April 2023, limited to those in English and published during January 2000-March 2023. PROSPERO ID CRD42023399410.

Recent findings: From 454 identified studies, 24 relevant articles were identified from a range of countries including the United Kingdom, the United States, Israel, Egypt, Canada, Germany, and Brazil. Data on study design, participants, tests performed, and outcomes were collated. There is a considerable burden of psychiatric, affective, and cognitive conditions, as well as impaired quality of life, in adult patients with IIH. Notably, these were independently correlated with the presence of headache in a number of studies and with obesity in others.

Summary: Aside from optimizing symptom control, including reducing the severity of headaches and protecting visual function, clinicians should be mindful of the biopsychosocial difficulties and potential cognitive impairments patients with IIH face. Assistance may be required with managing concurrent depression and anxiety, as well as optimizing cognitive function. Incorporating neuropsychological assessment and individualized management strategies may be beneficial at the point of diagnosis and throughout the illness.

Background and objectives: Decisions on enteral nutrition for patients with dysphagia after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are often not evidence based. We sought to determine whether development of a nutritional support algorithm leveraging the Predictive Swallowing Score (PRESS) could improve process times without placement of unnecessary gastrostomies.

Methods: This is a quality improvement study conducted at an academic medical center comparing a 6-month cohort of adults with AIS and dysphagia prepathway (PRE, July 1, 2019-December 31, 2019) and a 6-month cohort postpathway (POST, January 1, 2020-June 30, 2020). Gastrostomy recommendation, time to gastrostomy decision (TTD), discharge with gastrostomy, discharge with a nasogastric tube (NGT), and length of stay (LOS) were compared between groups.

Results: Among 121 patients with AIS and dysphagia, 58 (48%) were hospitalized prealgorithm and 63 (52%) postalgorithm. PRE TTD was longer than POST TTD (4.5 vs 1.5 days, p = 0.004). Frequency of gastrostomy was similar between PRE and POST (12% vs 8%, p = 0.58). LOS for patients recommended gastrostomy was longer in PRE (14.5 vs 6.5 days, p = 0.03). Frequency of discharge with NGT was numerically higher in POST but not significantly different (0.7% vs 6%, p = 0.4). Overall, LOS was the same in both groups (5 days).

Discussion: Development of a structured nutritional support algorithm incorporating PRESS may help facilitate sooner gastrostomy placement without increasing gastrostomy placement frequency and encourage more discharges to inpatient rehabilitation facilities with NGTs.

Background and objectives: Despite their high health care use, it is unclear whether the health care needs of people with MS are being met and what their priorities are. We assessed priorities for access to, and affordability of care, by people living with MS in the United States. We also tested the association between perceived inadequate access to care and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Methods: In Fall 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of participants in the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis Registry about access to care and HRQoL (Health Utilities Index Mark III). We used multivariable polytomous logistic regression to test sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with access to care. We used multivariable linear regression analysis to test the association between access to care and HRQoL.

Results: We included 4,914 respondents in the analysis, of whom 3,974 (80.9%) were women, with a mean (SD) age 64.4 (9.9) years. The providers who were most reported as needed but inaccessible were complementary providers (35.5%), followed by allied health providers (24.2%), occupational therapists (22.7%), and mental health providers (20.7%). Over 80% of participants reported that it was important or very important to be able to get an appointment with their primary MS health care provider when needed, to have sufficient time in their appointments to explain their concerns, to see their neurologist if their status changed, and that their health care providers communicated to coordinate their care. Participants who reported needing to see the provider but not having access or seeing the provider but would like to see them more often had lower HRQOL (ranging from -0.059 to -0.176) than participants who saw the provider as much as needed.

Discussion: Gaps in access to care persist for people with MS in the United States and substantially affect HRQoL. Improving access to care for people with MS should be a health system priority.

Background: Alzheimer dementia (AD) constitutes a major societal problem with devastating neuropsychiatric involvement. Pharmaceutical interventions carry a heightened risk of side effects; thus, nonpharmacological interventions such as music-based interventions (MBIs), including music therapy, are recommended.

Recent findings: The 2023 Neurology release of the Music Based Intervention Toolkit for Brain Disorders of Aging showcased music's emerging role as an intervention to manage symptoms of various brain disorders while defining the building blocks of MBIs to guide research in the exploration of music's therapeutic potential.

Implications for practice: This study extends beyond the research aspects of the MBI Toolkit to clinical applications by providing neurologists with a summary of MBIs, the MBI Toolkit, how board-certified music therapists (MT-BCs) administered music therapy is a unique MBI, and 10 reasons why they should make referrals to music therapy for their patients with AD.

Background: Neuroprognostication for disorders of consciousness (DoC) after severe acute brain injury is a major challenge, and the conventional clinical approach struggles to keep pace with a rapidly evolving literature. Lacking specialization, and fragmented between providers, conventional neuroprognostication is variable, frequently incongruent with guidelines, and prone to error, contributing to avoidable mortality and morbidity.

Recent findings: We review the limitations of the conventional approach to neuroprognostication and DoC care, and propose a paradigm entitled the Recovery of Consciousness Via Evidence-Based Medicine and Research (RECOVER) program to address them. The aim of the RECOVER program is to provide specialized, comprehensive, and longitudinal care that synthesizes interdisciplinary perspectives, provides continuity to patients and families, and improves the future of DoC care through research and education.

Implications for practice: This model, if broadly adopted, may help establish neuroprognostication as a new subspecialty that improves the care of this vulnerable patient population.

Background and objectives: To compare long-term seizure control in patients with long-term VNS (vagal nerve stimulator) stimulation (VNS-on) with those who discontinued VNS after >3 years (VNS-off).

Methods: Patients with refractory epilepsy with VNS therapy for >3 years (and follow-up for >2 years after VNS discontinuation for VNS-off patients) were included. Patients with brain surgery <3 years after VNS were excluded. We compared the percentage of patients with ≥50% seizure reduction (50% responder rate) and change in seizure frequency within and between groups in follow-up.

Results: Thirty-three VNS-on and 16 VNS-off patients were evaluated. VNS-on patients underwent stimulation for 9.7 years (mean). VNS-off patients had VNS treatment for 6.5 years (mean), discontinued treatment, then had additional 8.0 years (mean) follow-up. 50% responder rates were similar between groups (VNS-on: 54.5% vs VNS-off at last-on: 37.5%, p = 0.26; vs VNS-off at the last follow-up: 62.5%, p = 0.60). VNS-on patients had a significant reduction in seizure frequency at the last follow-up compared with baseline (median [Mdn] = -4.5 seizures/month, interquartile range [IQR] = 14.0, 56% reduction, p = 0.013). VNS-off patients also showed significant seizure reduction while still continuing VNS therapy (Mdn = -1.0 seizures/month, IQR = 13.0, 35% reduction, p = 0.020) and, after discontinuing therapy, at the last follow-up compared with baseline (Mdn = -3.2, IQR = 11.0, 52% reduction, p = 0.020). The 2 groups were comparable in seizure frequency change both at the last-on visit (absolute change, p = 0.62; relative change, p = 0.50) at the last follow-up (absolute change, p = 0.67; relative change, p = 0.76).

Discussion: Patients who discontinued VNS therapy and those who continued therapy had similar response during active treatment and similar long-term outcomes, suggesting that factors such as the natural disease course and/or medication treatment strongly affect long-term outcomes.

Background and objectives: Patients with acute symptomatic seizures (ASyS) and acute epileptiform findings on EEG are common. They are often prescribed long-term antiseizure medications (ASMs); it is unknown whether or when this is necessary. Primary outcome was late unprovoked seizure occurrence and association with ASM taper. The secondary outcome was EEG pattern evolution over time.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients from 2015 to 2021 with ASyS (clinical or electrographic) and/or epileptiform findings on index hospitalization EEGs who were discharged on ASMs and had subsequent follow-up including an outpatient EEG at Yale New Haven Hospital. All patients were seen in our postacute symptomatic seizure (PASS) clinic after hospital discharge. We also developed a simple predictive score, Epilepsy-PASS (EPI-PASS), using variables independently associated with seizure recurrence based on stepwise regression; each of the 3 identified variables was assigned a score of 0 (absent) or 1 (present), for a total score of 0-3.

Results: Of 190 patients screened, 58 were excluded, leaving a final cohort of 112 patients. Twenty-four percent (27/112) patients developed a late unprovoked seizure (i.e., epilepsy). Independent predictors of epilepsy were persistence of epileptiform abnormalities on follow-up EEGs [56% developed epilepsy vs 19% without, 0.002, OR 7.18 (1.36-37.88)], clinical ASyS [32% vs 13%, p = 0.002, OR 7.45 (2.31-54.36)], and cortical involvement on imaging [40% vs 11%, p = 0.003, OR 7.63 (1.96-29.58)]. None of the 23 patients with none of these predictors (0 points on EPI-PASS) developed epilepsy, vs 13% with 1 predictor (EPI-PASS = 1) and 46% with 2 or 3 predictors (EPI-PASS = 2-3) at 1-year follow-up. ASM taper was not associated with seizure recurrence. Abnormal EEG findings in the index hospitalization usually resolved [54/69 (78%) patients] on subsequent EEGs.

Discussion: Most patients with clinical ASyS or acute epileptiform EEG findings do not require long-term ASMs. Index hospitalization EEG findings usually resolve, but if they do not, there is a >50% chance of developing epilepsy. Other predictors of epilepsy are cortical involvement on imaging and clinical ASyS. A simple 4-point scale using these 3 predictors (EPI-PASS) may help predict the risk of developing epilepsy but requires independent validation.

Background: Approximately 6.9 million American individuals have Alzheimer dementia and 50% have mild disease. Lecanemab, an approved antiamyloid antibody, is associated with modest reduction in functional decline in patients with mild dementia or mild cognitive impairment. In Clarity-AD, 239 (26.6%) of patients experienced amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs) overall (i.e., ARIAs associated with hemorrhages or edema). The complexity of treatment and risks of adverse events necessitate a multidisciplinary collaborative approach.

Recent findings: With limited treatment options, lecanemab approval generated significant interest among clinicians, patients, and families. Lecanemab treatment requires biweekly infusions along with ongoing imaging tests, laboratory monitoring, patient assessment, drug interaction screening, and cognitive function monitoring. Processes to support patient selection, access, and safety are important given the monitoring requirements and total cost of care.

Implications for practice: The planning process for lecanemab can serve as a blueprint to support safe and effective management of therapeutic innovation in neurology and other areas.

Background and objectives: The published data about mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in cancer patients is sparse. We present our institutional experience in this clinical scenario, and a meta-analysis.

Methods: The baseline data, procedural data, clinical and radiological outcomes of MT were analyzed and compared among three groups of stroke patients: controls, patients with active malignancy (AM), and patients with history of malignancy (HOM). A meta-analysis of 12 studies was conducted to address the differences between controls and AM patients regarding selected outcomes.

Results: The 3 groups (controls, AM, HOM) showed significant differences regarding previous history of stroke or TIA (7.8% vs 10.5% vs 38.5%, p = 0.006), alcohol consumption (0.9% vs 10.5% vs 0.0%, p = 0.04), thrombophilia (1.7% vs 15.8% vs 7.7%, p = 0.009), deep venous thrombosis (0.4 vs 26.3% vs 7.7%, p = 0.005). The AM group had significantly higher rates of sICH (3.5% [controls] vs 21.1% [AM] vs 0.0% [HOM], p = 0.007), and mortality at 3 months (27.5% [controls] vs 61.5% [AM] vs 40.0% [HOM] vs, p = 0.032). The control and HOM groups had significantly better functional independence at 3 months (52.1% [controls] vs 15.4% [AM] vs 60.0% [HOM], p = 0.032).In the meta-analysis, the AM arm showed significantly higher mortality during hospitalization (n = 6, OR 95% CI = 3.03 [1.62, 5.64]), and at 3 months (n = 10, OR 95% CI = 4.33 [2.80, 6.68]), and significantly lower rates of 3 months functional independence (mRS = 0-2) (n = 10, OR 95% CI = 0.47 [0.32, 0.70]). No significant difference was found in sICH rates (n = 6, pooled OR 95% CI = 2.03 [0.83, 4.95]).

Discussion: Endovascular MT is technically successful and reasonably safe in treating AIS from LVO in active malignancy patients. However, the causes and implications of sICH require further investigation. Despite technical success, these patients experience poor clinical outcomes, and the long-term benefits of MT remain uncertain.