Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-07-07DOI: 10.1002/nau.70114
Christina Mezes, Aya Niimi, George Kasyan, Amy D Dobberfuhl, Sachin Malde
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to establish expert consensus on the rationale for, and components of, a global patient registry for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). Our goal is to highlight what a comprehensive international patient registry can add to the growing body of IC/BPS-focused research and summarize the committee's rationale for inclusion or exclusion of certain patient and diagnostic characteristics to identify sub-groups of patients who will benefit from targeted therapy.
Materials and methods: An expert working group was formed from members of the Global Consensus on IC/BPS meeting. The working group consisted of four Urologists and a Urogynaecologist, and held a series of meetings in 2025 to achieve consensus on the benefits, hurdles and practical aspects of developing a global registry for IC/BPS. Literature search of the PubMed database was also performed where relevant, and all members agreed on the final proposals.
Results: The framework for an IC/BPS global registry was developed inclusive of male and female patients ages 18 years and older, who have symptoms of pain, pressure or discomfort related to the bladder, along with lower urinary tract symptoms, that have persisted for 3 or more months, in the absence of confusable disorders. A comprehensive list of patient data points including demographic, history-related, and comorbid conditions was developed. Additionally, validated questionnaires were identified for inclusion that assess domains of pain, urinary symptoms and quality of life. Consensus was reached regarding collecting data on prior treatment, cystoscopy findings and biopsy results where applicable. Lastly, importance was placed on patient-reported questionnaire data that can be input longitudinally by patients to lessen the burden of data collection by providers. Technical, legal and financial aspects were addressed as potential barriers.
Conclusions: A global registry for IC/BPS would overcome the limitations of current regional registries by including large numbers of patients from varied geographical locations, allowing for more efficient recruitment of patients for clinical trials. Understanding epidemiological trends and global variation in practice would enable optimization of care and quality improvement worldwide.
{"title":"Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: Why a Global Patient Registry Is Critically Needed.","authors":"Christina Mezes, Aya Niimi, George Kasyan, Amy D Dobberfuhl, Sachin Malde","doi":"10.1002/nau.70114","DOIUrl":"10.1002/nau.70114","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this article is to establish expert consensus on the rationale for, and components of, a global patient registry for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). Our goal is to highlight what a comprehensive international patient registry can add to the growing body of IC/BPS-focused research and summarize the committee's rationale for inclusion or exclusion of certain patient and diagnostic characteristics to identify sub-groups of patients who will benefit from targeted therapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An expert working group was formed from members of the Global Consensus on IC/BPS meeting. The working group consisted of four Urologists and a Urogynaecologist, and held a series of meetings in 2025 to achieve consensus on the benefits, hurdles and practical aspects of developing a global registry for IC/BPS. Literature search of the PubMed database was also performed where relevant, and all members agreed on the final proposals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The framework for an IC/BPS global registry was developed inclusive of male and female patients ages 18 years and older, who have symptoms of pain, pressure or discomfort related to the bladder, along with lower urinary tract symptoms, that have persisted for 3 or more months, in the absence of confusable disorders. A comprehensive list of patient data points including demographic, history-related, and comorbid conditions was developed. Additionally, validated questionnaires were identified for inclusion that assess domains of pain, urinary symptoms and quality of life. Consensus was reached regarding collecting data on prior treatment, cystoscopy findings and biopsy results where applicable. Lastly, importance was placed on patient-reported questionnaire data that can be input longitudinally by patients to lessen the burden of data collection by providers. Technical, legal and financial aspects were addressed as potential barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A global registry for IC/BPS would overcome the limitations of current regional registries by including large numbers of patients from varied geographical locations, allowing for more efficient recruitment of patients for clinical trials. Understanding epidemiological trends and global variation in practice would enable optimization of care and quality improvement worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":"71-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144575936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-17DOI: 10.1002/nau.70170
Dylan T Wolff, Carl D Langefeld, Julie T Call, Gopal Badlani, Robert J Evans, Stephen J Walker
Aims: The objective of this study was to assess the duration and clinical correlates of positive response in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome patients undergoing therapeutic bladder hydrodistension (HOD) or HOD with electrofulguration (for those with Hunner lesions).
Methods: One hundred and twenty four women were enrolled in this prospective IRB-approved study. Participants answered a set of validated questionnaires at intake including chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPCs), brief pain index (BPI), and IC/BPS symptomatic questionnaires. These were repeated at 1, 2-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months posttreatment, together with a global response assessment (GRA). The primary outcome measure was the GRA score. A secondary analysis of patients who were strong responders to treatment was used to identify clinical correlates of positive response.
Results: At 1-month post-HOD, 62 patients (53.9%) were responders (i.e., reported persistent positive response to treatment). Further, 21/49 (42.9%) respondents continued to report a positive response at 12 months. Logistic regression analyses identified several correlates of strong response to therapy including absence of Huynner lesions (odds ratio (OR) = 3.629), lack of diagnosis of fibromyalgia (OR = 0.31), lower number of total sites of pain on BPI pain map (OR = 0.91), fewer total number of COPCs (OR = 0.36), and lower complex medical symptom inventory scale (CMSI; OR = 0.91). After false discovery rate correction, only the CMSI remained statistically significant.
Conclusions: Therapeutic hydrodistension results in a clinically meaningful and sustained improvement in associated symptoms and pain for many patients. However, having higher scores on markers of a widespread pain/non-bladder centric phenotype was associated with a lower treatment success rate.
{"title":"Correlates of Positive Response to Therapeutic Hydrodistension in Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome.","authors":"Dylan T Wolff, Carl D Langefeld, Julie T Call, Gopal Badlani, Robert J Evans, Stephen J Walker","doi":"10.1002/nau.70170","DOIUrl":"10.1002/nau.70170","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the duration and clinical correlates of positive response in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome patients undergoing therapeutic bladder hydrodistension (HOD) or HOD with electrofulguration (for those with Hunner lesions).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and twenty four women were enrolled in this prospective IRB-approved study. Participants answered a set of validated questionnaires at intake including chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPCs), brief pain index (BPI), and IC/BPS symptomatic questionnaires. These were repeated at 1, 2-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months posttreatment, together with a global response assessment (GRA). The primary outcome measure was the GRA score. A secondary analysis of patients who were strong responders to treatment was used to identify clinical correlates of positive response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 1-month post-HOD, 62 patients (53.9%) were responders (i.e., reported persistent positive response to treatment). Further, 21/49 (42.9%) respondents continued to report a positive response at 12 months. Logistic regression analyses identified several correlates of strong response to therapy including absence of Huynner lesions (odds ratio (OR) = 3.629), lack of diagnosis of fibromyalgia (OR = 0.31), lower number of total sites of pain on BPI pain map (OR = 0.91), fewer total number of COPCs (OR = 0.36), and lower complex medical symptom inventory scale (CMSI; OR = 0.91). After false discovery rate correction, only the CMSI remained statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapeutic hydrodistension results in a clinically meaningful and sustained improvement in associated symptoms and pain for many patients. However, having higher scores on markers of a widespread pain/non-bladder centric phenotype was associated with a lower treatment success rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":"169-176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12748011/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145308411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-07-03DOI: 10.1002/nau.70103
Madeline Snipes, Wyatt Whitman, Michel Pontari, Jennifer Anger, Michael Samarinas, Rajesh Taneja
Aims: In April 2025, the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine hosted a Global Consensus meeting on interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) in Winston-Salem, NC. The goal of this meeting was to establish attainable targets in phenotyping, diagnosis, and biomarkers for IC/BPS. Our subcommittee focused on developing a consensus document addressing IC/BPS in men.
Methods: Narrative review.
Results: Within this document, we discuss prevalence, clinical characteristics, evaluation/investigation, and treatment of IC/BPS in men. The is limited literature specifically addressing IC/BPS within the male population, as IC/BPS has traditionally been considered a disease of women. Thus, prevalence data varies widely. Diagnosis of IC/BPS in men is fraught with difficulty, as there is much overlap with other chronic pelvic pain syndrome, specifically chronic prostatitis. Key clinical features specific to IC/BPS are pain with bladder filling and relief with voiding. Painful ejaculation may be indicative of pelvic floor dysfunction. Physical exam, including extensive pelvic exam with analysis of pelvic floor tenderness, is critical in correct diagnosis. Ultrasound +/- urodynamics may be used to rule out obstructive disease, and urinalysis +/- culture must be used to rule out infection. There are no treatments specific to men with IC/BPS.
Conclusions: We have described the prevalence, clinical characteristics, evaluation, and treatment of IC/BPS in men. There is a significant need for more sex-specific research of IC/BPS with consideration for hormonal and anatomical factors that may differentiate the disease in men.
Clinical trial registration: No new data were generated for this manuscript; no clinical trial was conducted.
{"title":"Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome in Men.","authors":"Madeline Snipes, Wyatt Whitman, Michel Pontari, Jennifer Anger, Michael Samarinas, Rajesh Taneja","doi":"10.1002/nau.70103","DOIUrl":"10.1002/nau.70103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In April 2025, the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine hosted a Global Consensus meeting on interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) in Winston-Salem, NC. The goal of this meeting was to establish attainable targets in phenotyping, diagnosis, and biomarkers for IC/BPS. Our subcommittee focused on developing a consensus document addressing IC/BPS in men.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Narrative review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within this document, we discuss prevalence, clinical characteristics, evaluation/investigation, and treatment of IC/BPS in men. The is limited literature specifically addressing IC/BPS within the male population, as IC/BPS has traditionally been considered a disease of women. Thus, prevalence data varies widely. Diagnosis of IC/BPS in men is fraught with difficulty, as there is much overlap with other chronic pelvic pain syndrome, specifically chronic prostatitis. Key clinical features specific to IC/BPS are pain with bladder filling and relief with voiding. Painful ejaculation may be indicative of pelvic floor dysfunction. Physical exam, including extensive pelvic exam with analysis of pelvic floor tenderness, is critical in correct diagnosis. Ultrasound +/- urodynamics may be used to rule out obstructive disease, and urinalysis +/- culture must be used to rule out infection. There are no treatments specific to men with IC/BPS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have described the prevalence, clinical characteristics, evaluation, and treatment of IC/BPS in men. There is a significant need for more sex-specific research of IC/BPS with consideration for hormonal and anatomical factors that may differentiate the disease in men.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>No new data were generated for this manuscript; no clinical trial was conducted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":"26-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12748021/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144554027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-07-16DOI: 10.1002/nau.70117
Hannah Ruetten, LaTasha K Crawford, Elise J B De, Wencheng Li, Yoshiyuki Akiyama
Aims: In April of 2025, a Global Consensus meeting on IC/BPS was held in Winston-Salem, NC. The goal of this meeting was to establish global consensus in diagnostic criteria, phenotyping, treatment outcome assessment, and possible etiopathology in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). Our sub-committee focused on developing a consensus document on histopathology in IC/BPS.
Methods: Narrative review.
Results: Herein we discuss histological and molecular distinctions of Hunner lesion disease (HLD) and non-Hunner lesion disease (non-HLD) in IC/BPS, including urothelial alterations, inflammatory changes, vascularization and fibrosis, and neurophysiological dysfunction. The molecular and histological characteristics of HLD make it distinct from non-HLD. HLD is histologically characterized by urothelial denudation and subepithelial chronic inflammation featured by B-cell dominant lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, while non-HLD shows subtle inflammatory changes with preserved urothelial layers. Some cases of non-HLD reflect a component of multi-systemic pain syndrome driven by altered neurophysiological networks within the central or peripheral nervous system.
Conclusions: Molecular and histological characteristics revealed that HLD and non-HLD are distinct disease entities as the former is an inflammatory disease of the urinary bladder and the latter may be represented by systemic neurophysiological disorder, rather than pathology that is limited to the bladder. This concept could be useful in phenotyping, diagnosis, and development of biomarkers for IC/BPS.
Trial registration: No new data were generated for this manuscript; no clinical trial was conducted.
{"title":"Genomics and Histopathology in Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome.","authors":"Hannah Ruetten, LaTasha K Crawford, Elise J B De, Wencheng Li, Yoshiyuki Akiyama","doi":"10.1002/nau.70117","DOIUrl":"10.1002/nau.70117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In April of 2025, a Global Consensus meeting on IC/BPS was held in Winston-Salem, NC. The goal of this meeting was to establish global consensus in diagnostic criteria, phenotyping, treatment outcome assessment, and possible etiopathology in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). Our sub-committee focused on developing a consensus document on histopathology in IC/BPS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Narrative review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Herein we discuss histological and molecular distinctions of Hunner lesion disease (HLD) and non-Hunner lesion disease (non-HLD) in IC/BPS, including urothelial alterations, inflammatory changes, vascularization and fibrosis, and neurophysiological dysfunction. The molecular and histological characteristics of HLD make it distinct from non-HLD. HLD is histologically characterized by urothelial denudation and subepithelial chronic inflammation featured by B-cell dominant lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, while non-HLD shows subtle inflammatory changes with preserved urothelial layers. Some cases of non-HLD reflect a component of multi-systemic pain syndrome driven by altered neurophysiological networks within the central or peripheral nervous system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Molecular and histological characteristics revealed that HLD and non-HLD are distinct disease entities as the former is an inflammatory disease of the urinary bladder and the latter may be represented by systemic neurophysiological disorder, rather than pathology that is limited to the bladder. This concept could be useful in phenotyping, diagnosis, and development of biomarkers for IC/BPS.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>No new data were generated for this manuscript; no clinical trial was conducted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":"54-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12748040/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144649988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urodynamic studies (UDS) are essential diagnostic tools in urology, but their interpretation requires significant expertise and is subject to interobserver variability. Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in various medical diagnostic applications, yet their utility in automated interpretation of urodynamic parameters remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of large language models in the automated interpretation of urodynamic parameters compared to urologists with different experience levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 320 urodynamic studies from patients with various lower urinary tract conditions. Two large language models (Deepseek-R1 and GPT-4) were employed to interpret the urodynamic data. Their diagnostic accuracy was compared with that of junior and senior urologists. Performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), diagnostic accuracy, and the QUEST framework (Quality of information, Understanding and reasoning, Expression style, Safety, and Trustworthiness). This study was designed and reported following the TRIPOD + AI statement for reporting prediction models using machine learning methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Deepseek-R1 demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy (92.50%) among the automated systems, followed by GPT-4 (85.94%), comparable to junior urologists (83.75%) but lower than senior urologists (95.94%). The reference standard was established by consensus of three board-certified urodynamics experts with median 15 years of experience (range 12-22 years). ROC analysis revealed strong performance across different urological conditions, with AUC values ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 for Deepseek-R1, 0.84-0.88 for GPT-4, 0.81-0.84 for junior urologists, and 0.94-0.95 for senior urologists. The QUEST framework evaluation showed that Deepseek-R1 outperformed other systems in information quality, reasoning, expression style, safety, and trustworthiness. Both LLMs demonstrated high clinical utility, with Deepseek-R1 scoring higher in decision support (4.38/5), time efficiency (2.10/5), and educational value (4.20/5) compared to GPT-4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Large language models, particularly Deepseek-R1, demonstrate promising capabilities in the automated interpretation of urodynamic parameters, with performance exceeding that of junior urologists and approaching senior urologists. These findings suggest potential applications in clinical decision support, training, and quality assurance in urodynamic practice, which could enhance diagnostic consistency and accessibility of expert-level interpretation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This study is a retrospective analysis of deidentified patient data and did not involve any direct patient contact or intervention. Therefore, ethics approval was waived in accordance with ins
{"title":"Application of Large Language Models in Automated Interpretation of Urodynamic Parameters.","authors":"Zhen Wang, Zhongle Xu, Yong Shi, Junhua Xi, Yanbin Zhang","doi":"10.1002/nau.70160","DOIUrl":"10.1002/nau.70160","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urodynamic studies (UDS) are essential diagnostic tools in urology, but their interpretation requires significant expertise and is subject to interobserver variability. Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in various medical diagnostic applications, yet their utility in automated interpretation of urodynamic parameters remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of large language models in the automated interpretation of urodynamic parameters compared to urologists with different experience levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 320 urodynamic studies from patients with various lower urinary tract conditions. Two large language models (Deepseek-R1 and GPT-4) were employed to interpret the urodynamic data. Their diagnostic accuracy was compared with that of junior and senior urologists. Performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), diagnostic accuracy, and the QUEST framework (Quality of information, Understanding and reasoning, Expression style, Safety, and Trustworthiness). This study was designed and reported following the TRIPOD + AI statement for reporting prediction models using machine learning methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Deepseek-R1 demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy (92.50%) among the automated systems, followed by GPT-4 (85.94%), comparable to junior urologists (83.75%) but lower than senior urologists (95.94%). The reference standard was established by consensus of three board-certified urodynamics experts with median 15 years of experience (range 12-22 years). ROC analysis revealed strong performance across different urological conditions, with AUC values ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 for Deepseek-R1, 0.84-0.88 for GPT-4, 0.81-0.84 for junior urologists, and 0.94-0.95 for senior urologists. The QUEST framework evaluation showed that Deepseek-R1 outperformed other systems in information quality, reasoning, expression style, safety, and trustworthiness. Both LLMs demonstrated high clinical utility, with Deepseek-R1 scoring higher in decision support (4.38/5), time efficiency (2.10/5), and educational value (4.20/5) compared to GPT-4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Large language models, particularly Deepseek-R1, demonstrate promising capabilities in the automated interpretation of urodynamic parameters, with performance exceeding that of junior urologists and approaching senior urologists. These findings suggest potential applications in clinical decision support, training, and quality assurance in urodynamic practice, which could enhance diagnostic consistency and accessibility of expert-level interpretation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This study is a retrospective analysis of deidentified patient data and did not involve any direct patient contact or intervention. Therefore, ethics approval was waived in accordance with ins","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":"84-95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145302084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-17DOI: 10.1002/nau.70167
Stefano Terzoni, Serena Maruccia, Laura Di Prisco, Mauro Parozzi, Rosario Caruso, Paolo Ferrara, Silvia Cilluffo, Giorgia Barbuiani, Cristian Ricci, Serena Togni, Bernardo Rocco, Giorgia Gaia, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Cristina Mora, Maura Lusignani
Introduction: Urinary incontinence is a common complication after radical prostatectomy. Several meta-analyses have evaluated the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for continence recovery, but their findings are inconsistent, and not all include all relevant studies. This meta-analysis aims to address these gaps.
Objectives: The study aims to summarize evidence on the effectiveness of preoperative PFMT, with or without biofeedback, on continence recovery post-prostatectomy.
Materials and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The PICO framework was used: Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, Intervention: preoperative PFMT, Comparison: any postoperative intervention or monitoring, Outcome: continence recovery. Studies were sourced from PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and PEdro. Quality was assessed using the PEdro scale, and statistical analysis was performed using a random effect model.
Results: Six studies were included. Preoperative PFMT did not significantly improve continence recovery 1 month post-surgery (odds-ratio 2.01, 95% CI [0.94-4.31], p = 0.37). However, a significant improvement was observed 3 months post-surgery (odds-ratio 1.52, 95% CI [1.05-2.20], p = 0.03). No significant differences were found at 6 months (odds-ratio 1.28, 95% CI [0.85-1.94], p = 0.95) and twelve months (odds-ratio 0.73, 95% CI [0.43-1.23], p = 0.32).
Conclusions: Preoperative PFMT may improve continence recovery 3 months post-surgery but not at one, six, or twelve months. The study highlights the need for standardized assessment criteria and further research on robotic-assisted prostatectomy. The innovative aspect of this study lies in its conservative inclusion criteria and focus on preoperative PFMT's potential benefits.
Clinical trial registration: Not applicable. This study did not require clinical trial registration because it is a systematic review and meta-analysis of previously published studies.
导读:尿失禁是根治性前列腺切除术后常见的并发症。一些荟萃分析已经评估了骨盆底肌肉训练(PFMT)对失禁恢复的有效性,但他们的发现不一致,并不是所有的研究都包括所有相关的研究。本荟萃分析旨在解决这些差距。目的:本研究旨在总结术前PFMT(有或没有生物反馈)对前列腺切除术后失禁恢复的有效性的证据。材料和方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。采用PICO框架:接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者,干预:术前PFMT,比较:术后任何干预或监测,结果:失禁恢复。研究来源于PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science和PEdro。采用PEdro量表评价质量,采用随机效应模型进行统计分析。结果:纳入6项研究。术前PFMT未显著改善术后1个月的失禁恢复(优势比2.01,95% CI [0.94-4.31], p = 0.37)。然而,术后3个月明显改善(优势比1.52,95% CI [1.05-2.20], p = 0.03)。6个月时(比值比1.28,95% CI [0.85-1.94], p = 0.95)和12个月时(比值比0.73,95% CI [0.43-1.23], p = 0.32)无显著差异。结论:术前PFMT可以改善术后3个月的失禁恢复,但在1、6或12个月时则没有效果。该研究强调了标准化评估标准和进一步研究机器人辅助前列腺切除术的必要性。本研究的创新之处在于其保守的纳入标准和对术前PFMT潜在益处的关注。临床试验注册:不适用。这项研究不需要临床试验注册,因为它是对先前发表的研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
{"title":"Preoperative Pelvic Muscle Training for Continence Recovery After Prostatectomy: Yet Another Meta-Analysis?","authors":"Stefano Terzoni, Serena Maruccia, Laura Di Prisco, Mauro Parozzi, Rosario Caruso, Paolo Ferrara, Silvia Cilluffo, Giorgia Barbuiani, Cristian Ricci, Serena Togni, Bernardo Rocco, Giorgia Gaia, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Cristina Mora, Maura Lusignani","doi":"10.1002/nau.70167","DOIUrl":"10.1002/nau.70167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Urinary incontinence is a common complication after radical prostatectomy. Several meta-analyses have evaluated the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for continence recovery, but their findings are inconsistent, and not all include all relevant studies. This meta-analysis aims to address these gaps.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aims to summarize evidence on the effectiveness of preoperative PFMT, with or without biofeedback, on continence recovery post-prostatectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The PICO framework was used: Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, Intervention: preoperative PFMT, Comparison: any postoperative intervention or monitoring, Outcome: continence recovery. Studies were sourced from PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and PEdro. Quality was assessed using the PEdro scale, and statistical analysis was performed using a random effect model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies were included. Preoperative PFMT did not significantly improve continence recovery 1 month post-surgery (odds-ratio 2.01, 95% CI [0.94-4.31], p = 0.37). However, a significant improvement was observed 3 months post-surgery (odds-ratio 1.52, 95% CI [1.05-2.20], p = 0.03). No significant differences were found at 6 months (odds-ratio 1.28, 95% CI [0.85-1.94], p = 0.95) and twelve months (odds-ratio 0.73, 95% CI [0.43-1.23], p = 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative PFMT may improve continence recovery 3 months post-surgery but not at one, six, or twelve months. The study highlights the need for standardized assessment criteria and further research on robotic-assisted prostatectomy. The innovative aspect of this study lies in its conservative inclusion criteria and focus on preoperative PFMT's potential benefits.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Not applicable. This study did not require clinical trial registration because it is a systematic review and meta-analysis of previously published studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":"127-136"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145308516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-06-29DOI: 10.1002/nau.70097
Maxwell L Sandberg, Laura Santurri, David Klumpp, Larissa V Rodriguez, Daniel Clauw, Henry Lai
Aims: The aim of this manuscript was to provide a narrative review of the etiopathology of three different interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) phenotypes: Hunner lesion, widespread pain, and low bladder capacity.
Methods: IC/BPS literature was reviewed by the authors specific to the three phenotypes, focusing on etiopathology. Evidence was condensed and summarized on the different causes of each phenotype, emphasizing papers and abstracts dealing with basic science research, symptoms, and treatment options for patients afflicted with the three different IC/BPS phenotypes.
Results: Hunner lesion patients are marked by a distinct, visible inflammatory lesion in the bladder, inflammatory serum and urinary biomarkers, and respond well to bladder-centric treatments targeted specifically at the Hunner lesions. Widespread pain patients have diffuse pain attributed to central nervous system changes manifesting in the bladder, often with co-occurring non-bladder chronic pain conditions such as fibromyalgia and seem to respond better to systemic therapies. Low bladder capacity patients have a marked decrease in anesthetic bladder capacity during therapeutic hydrodistension of the bladder. They also tend to have higher pain scores, symptoms specifically concentrated at the bladder, and respond to localized treatments, constituting another bladder centric phenotype.
Conclusions: IC/BPS should not be thought to represent one unique type or pathophysiology, but rather a diverse group of patients, each with their own etiopathology and phenotypic manifestations.
Clinical trial registration: This was a narrative review and did not involve any direct intervention on patients nor direct patient contact and was not a clinical trial.
{"title":"A Review of the Etiopathology of Phenotypes in Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome.","authors":"Maxwell L Sandberg, Laura Santurri, David Klumpp, Larissa V Rodriguez, Daniel Clauw, Henry Lai","doi":"10.1002/nau.70097","DOIUrl":"10.1002/nau.70097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this manuscript was to provide a narrative review of the etiopathology of three different interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) phenotypes: Hunner lesion, widespread pain, and low bladder capacity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IC/BPS literature was reviewed by the authors specific to the three phenotypes, focusing on etiopathology. Evidence was condensed and summarized on the different causes of each phenotype, emphasizing papers and abstracts dealing with basic science research, symptoms, and treatment options for patients afflicted with the three different IC/BPS phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hunner lesion patients are marked by a distinct, visible inflammatory lesion in the bladder, inflammatory serum and urinary biomarkers, and respond well to bladder-centric treatments targeted specifically at the Hunner lesions. Widespread pain patients have diffuse pain attributed to central nervous system changes manifesting in the bladder, often with co-occurring non-bladder chronic pain conditions such as fibromyalgia and seem to respond better to systemic therapies. Low bladder capacity patients have a marked decrease in anesthetic bladder capacity during therapeutic hydrodistension of the bladder. They also tend to have higher pain scores, symptoms specifically concentrated at the bladder, and respond to localized treatments, constituting another bladder centric phenotype.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IC/BPS should not be thought to represent one unique type or pathophysiology, but rather a diverse group of patients, each with their own etiopathology and phenotypic manifestations.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This was a narrative review and did not involve any direct intervention on patients nor direct patient contact and was not a clinical trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":"11-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12748041/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144529056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Julia Duarte de Souza, Jose de Bessa, Natássia Cristina Carboni Truzzi, Carolina Trigo Rocha, Bruno Camargo Rocha Paim de Araujo, Julyana Kanate Mazzoni Moromizato, Thulio Bosi Vieira Brandão, Rachel Mazoni Costa, Marcelo Hisano, Zein Mohamed Sammour, Homero Bruschini, William Carlos Nahas, Cristiano Mendes Gomes
Aims: To evaluate the prevalence, clinical course, and risk factors of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, and to assess associations with comorbidities, disease severity, and vaccination status.
Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of adult patients hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19, who were not in intensive care at the time of enrollment, between July 2021 and March 2022. LUTS were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Overactive Bladder (ICIQ-OAB), and ICIQ-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) questionnaires during hospitalization and at one and 3 months post-discharge. Moderate to severe LUTS were defined as an IPSS > 7. Overactive bladder symptoms (OAB symptoms) were defined as an ICIQ-OAB Score ≥ 3 plus urgency and/or urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). Associations with sex, comorbidities, COVID-19 severity, and vaccination status were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.
Results: Among 168 patients (55.4% male, median age 58 years), 31.0% had moderate to severe LUTS during hospitalization, with storage symptoms predominating. Urgency was present in 21.4% of the cohort, and 36.7% met the criteria for OAB symptoms. Urinary incontinence (UI) affected 34.5%, being more frequent among women. At 3 months, moderate to severe LUTS declined to 21.9%, and both OAB symptoms and UI also decreased significantly. No associations were found between LUTS and comorbidities or disease severity. Fully vaccinated patients had higher odds of moderate to severe LUTS during hospitalization (adjusted OR 10.56, 95% CI 4.13-26.9), particularly those vaccinated with inactivated virus vaccines (BBIBP-CorV).
Conclusions: LUTS are prevalent in the acute phase of COVID-19, especially among women, but tend to improve within 3 months. Unexpectedly, full vaccination-especially with inactivated virus vaccines-was associated with increased odds of moderate to severe LUTS during hospitalization. Further studies are warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms and long-term implications.
Trial registration: This study was not registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, as it is an observational study with no clinical intervention.
目的:评估2019冠状病毒病住院患者下尿路症状(LUTS)的患病率、临床病程和危险因素,并评估其与合并症、疾病严重程度和疫苗接种状况的相关性。方法:在2021年7月至2022年3月期间,我们对确诊的COVID-19住院的成年患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,这些患者在入组时未接受重症监护。在住院期间和出院后1个月和3个月,使用国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、国际失禁问卷调查(ICIQ-OAB)和iciq -尿失禁简短问卷调查(ICIQ-UI SF)对LUTS进行评估。中度至重度LUTS被定义为IPSS bb[7]。膀胱过度活动症状(OAB症状)定义为ICIQ-OAB评分≥3 +急迫性和/或急迫性尿失禁(UUI)。使用多变量logistic回归分析与性别、合并症、COVID-19严重程度和疫苗接种状况的关系。结果:168例患者中,男性55.4%,中位年龄58岁,住院期间出现中重度LUTS的占31.0%,以储存症状为主。21.4%的患者出现急症,36.7%的患者符合OAB症状标准。尿失禁(UI)占34.5%,在女性中更为常见。3个月时,中重度LUTS下降至21.9%,OAB症状和UI也显著下降。未发现LUTS与合并症或疾病严重程度之间存在关联。完全接种疫苗的患者在住院期间发生中度至重度LUTS的几率更高(调整OR 10.56, 95% CI 4.13-26.9),特别是那些接种了灭活病毒疫苗(BBIBP-CorV)的患者。结论:LUTS在COVID-19急性期普遍存在,尤其是在女性中,但在3个月内趋于改善。出乎意料的是,全面接种疫苗——尤其是灭活病毒疫苗——与住院期间发生中度至重度LUTS的几率增加有关。有必要进一步研究其潜在机制和长期影响。试验注册:该研究未在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,因为它是一项观察性研究,没有临床干预。
{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 and Vaccination on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Insights From a Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Julia Duarte de Souza, Jose de Bessa, Natássia Cristina Carboni Truzzi, Carolina Trigo Rocha, Bruno Camargo Rocha Paim de Araujo, Julyana Kanate Mazzoni Moromizato, Thulio Bosi Vieira Brandão, Rachel Mazoni Costa, Marcelo Hisano, Zein Mohamed Sammour, Homero Bruschini, William Carlos Nahas, Cristiano Mendes Gomes","doi":"10.1002/nau.70201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70201","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the prevalence, clinical course, and risk factors of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, and to assess associations with comorbidities, disease severity, and vaccination status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study of adult patients hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19, who were not in intensive care at the time of enrollment, between July 2021 and March 2022. LUTS were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Overactive Bladder (ICIQ-OAB), and ICIQ-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) questionnaires during hospitalization and at one and 3 months post-discharge. Moderate to severe LUTS were defined as an IPSS > 7. Overactive bladder symptoms (OAB symptoms) were defined as an ICIQ-OAB Score ≥ 3 plus urgency and/or urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). Associations with sex, comorbidities, COVID-19 severity, and vaccination status were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 168 patients (55.4% male, median age 58 years), 31.0% had moderate to severe LUTS during hospitalization, with storage symptoms predominating. Urgency was present in 21.4% of the cohort, and 36.7% met the criteria for OAB symptoms. Urinary incontinence (UI) affected 34.5%, being more frequent among women. At 3 months, moderate to severe LUTS declined to 21.9%, and both OAB symptoms and UI also decreased significantly. No associations were found between LUTS and comorbidities or disease severity. Fully vaccinated patients had higher odds of moderate to severe LUTS during hospitalization (adjusted OR 10.56, 95% CI 4.13-26.9), particularly those vaccinated with inactivated virus vaccines (BBIBP-CorV).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LUTS are prevalent in the acute phase of COVID-19, especially among women, but tend to improve within 3 months. Unexpectedly, full vaccination-especially with inactivated virus vaccines-was associated with increased odds of moderate to severe LUTS during hospitalization. Further studies are warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms and long-term implications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was not registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, as it is an observational study with no clinical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145743648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jeremy Ockrim, Phil Toozs-Hobson, Chris Chapple, Vik Khullar, Kevin Rademakers, Sachin Malde, Bogdan Toia, Efstathios Papaefstathiou, Nikki Cotterill, Paul Abrams
Aim: Metrics used to evaluate meaningful clinical outcomes have long been a matter of controversy, particularly where there is no defined objective cure and patient-reported metrics (PROMs) are utilised as objective measures of subjective phenomena. The ICI-RS 2025 think tank discussed the relative merits of objective and subjective outcomes in clinical trials.
Methods: A review of medical literature in four key areas; hard metrics versus PROMs assessment of Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatments for Bladder Outflow Obstruction, for Stress Urinary Incontinence, and their use in current registries and databases were debated. Limitations of trial design were highlighted and proposals for further reporting, steering groups and guidance panels suggested.
Results: It is yet to be fully understood how objective data and PROMs weigh bias and variability. Longitudinal study for objective and subjective metrics is required. Qualitative study with benchmarking may allow future studies to allow patients to set their own goals and develop more nuanced, patient-defined PROMs. Databases incorporating core metrics, specialist assessments and regression analysis may have utility to create composite algorithms into unified scoring systems. Artificial intelligence learning may be applied to large datasets.
Conclusions: Both objective and subjective assessments have their limitations. A balanced approach, combining both may provide the most complete and accurate picture.
{"title":"What Evidence Do We Need From Objective and Subjective Outcomes in Order to Recommend Specific Operative Procedures for Men to Relieve BPO and Women With SUI? ICI-RS 2025.","authors":"Jeremy Ockrim, Phil Toozs-Hobson, Chris Chapple, Vik Khullar, Kevin Rademakers, Sachin Malde, Bogdan Toia, Efstathios Papaefstathiou, Nikki Cotterill, Paul Abrams","doi":"10.1002/nau.70178","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70178","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Metrics used to evaluate meaningful clinical outcomes have long been a matter of controversy, particularly where there is no defined objective cure and patient-reported metrics (PROMs) are utilised as objective measures of subjective phenomena. The ICI-RS 2025 think tank discussed the relative merits of objective and subjective outcomes in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of medical literature in four key areas; hard metrics versus PROMs assessment of Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatments for Bladder Outflow Obstruction, for Stress Urinary Incontinence, and their use in current registries and databases were debated. Limitations of trial design were highlighted and proposals for further reporting, steering groups and guidance panels suggested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It is yet to be fully understood how objective data and PROMs weigh bias and variability. Longitudinal study for objective and subjective metrics is required. Qualitative study with benchmarking may allow future studies to allow patients to set their own goals and develop more nuanced, patient-defined PROMs. Databases incorporating core metrics, specialist assessments and regression analysis may have utility to create composite algorithms into unified scoring systems. Artificial intelligence learning may be applied to large datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both objective and subjective assessments have their limitations. A balanced approach, combining both may provide the most complete and accurate picture.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145743567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Qi-Xiang Song, Sanjay Sinha, Bahareh Vahabi, Anthony Kanai, Christopher Fry, Pradeep Tyagi, Stefania Musco, Dudley Robinson, Marcus J Drake, Paul Abrams, Alan Wein, Christopher R Chapple
Background: Nocturia is a prevalent condition with systematic etiologies which require multidisciplinary collaborations during diagnosis and management. Here we evaluate current evidence and present unresolved research questions regarding the three key pathophysiological domains of nocturia with respect to a conceptual brain-kidney-bladder axis, namely sleep enhancement, extra-renal water reabsorption and circadian regulation of bladder tissue.
Methods: A Think Tank was convened at the 12th International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society meeting in June 2025, looking at novel therapeutic targets for nocturia. This article synthesizes key deliberations from this meeting session.
Results: The discussion was mainly focused on idiopathic nocturia with an overactive bladder symptom complex or nocturnal polyuria. Firstly, medications and conservative nondrug measures targeting sleep that could potentially improve nocturia were considered. Secondly, investigation of water reabsorption mechanisms within the bladder and the role of small molecule vasopressin receptor type-2 agonists were examined that may provide novel therapeutic options to rectify nocturnal polyuria. Finally, to address circadian misalignments, organ specific chronotherapies, based on abnormal circadian features of bladder tissues that can be curative for nocturia, were discussed.
Conclusions: The evidence indicates that promising therapeutic modalities targeting the regulation of sleep-wake cycles, intravesical water transport mechanisms, and circadian patterns of detrusor activity may offer alternative strategies for managing nocturnal polyuria. However, further mechanistic investigations and randomized controlled trials are required to advance these approaches toward clinical translation.
{"title":"Are There Potential New Therapeutic Avenues for Treating Idiopathic Nocturia? ICI-RS 2025.","authors":"Qi-Xiang Song, Sanjay Sinha, Bahareh Vahabi, Anthony Kanai, Christopher Fry, Pradeep Tyagi, Stefania Musco, Dudley Robinson, Marcus J Drake, Paul Abrams, Alan Wein, Christopher R Chapple","doi":"10.1002/nau.70182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nocturia is a prevalent condition with systematic etiologies which require multidisciplinary collaborations during diagnosis and management. Here we evaluate current evidence and present unresolved research questions regarding the three key pathophysiological domains of nocturia with respect to a conceptual brain-kidney-bladder axis, namely sleep enhancement, extra-renal water reabsorption and circadian regulation of bladder tissue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Think Tank was convened at the 12th International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society meeting in June 2025, looking at novel therapeutic targets for nocturia. This article synthesizes key deliberations from this meeting session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The discussion was mainly focused on idiopathic nocturia with an overactive bladder symptom complex or nocturnal polyuria. Firstly, medications and conservative nondrug measures targeting sleep that could potentially improve nocturia were considered. Secondly, investigation of water reabsorption mechanisms within the bladder and the role of small molecule vasopressin receptor type-2 agonists were examined that may provide novel therapeutic options to rectify nocturnal polyuria. Finally, to address circadian misalignments, organ specific chronotherapies, based on abnormal circadian features of bladder tissues that can be curative for nocturia, were discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evidence indicates that promising therapeutic modalities targeting the regulation of sleep-wake cycles, intravesical water transport mechanisms, and circadian patterns of detrusor activity may offer alternative strategies for managing nocturnal polyuria. However, further mechanistic investigations and randomized controlled trials are required to advance these approaches toward clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145743572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}